Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_953_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Dedication
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Technique
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Anatomy
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications

landmarktoidentifythelateralborderofthedissection.Careshouldbe
takennottodissecttoofarlaterallyduetotheriskofpotentially
disruptingpudendalinnervation.
Thescartissueisdividedthroughthemidlineifthesphincterhalvesare
joinedbyscar.Itisimportanttopreserveallscartissuetoanchorthe
sutures.Iftherepairisperformedearly,priortoscartissuedeveloping,
themuscleedgesretractlaterally.TheedgesaregraspedwithAllis
clamps.Themoremobilesideofthesphincterisplacedastheexternal
layer,andthelessmobilesideistheinnerlayer(Fig.15-2).
p.111
p.112
FIGURE15-2Sphincterscardividedbutnot
excised.
Afteradequatemobilization,anenblocoverlappingrepairoftheEAS–
IAScomplexisperformedusingverticalmattresssuturesof2.0
polydioxanonemonofilamentdelayedabsorptionsutures(PDS).
Whereaswepreferthissuture,somesurgeonspreferapermanentsuture
(Fig.15-3).

FIGURE15-3Internalanalsphincterimbricated
whenalayeredrepairisperformed.
Ifthesurgeonpreferstheanteriorlevatorplasty,IASimbrication,and
overlappingEASrepair,theinitialincisionanddissectionarethesameas
above.
Theintersphinctericspaceisthenmobilizedfromlateraltomedialtothe
areaofthemidlinescar,andexternalandIASsareseparated.
Therepairstartswithappositionofthelevatormuscleswiththree
interruptedsuturesof2.0PDS.
Theinternalmusclefibersareidentifiedandimbricatedwiththree,3.0
PDSmattresssutures(Fig.15-4).

FIGURE15-4Overlappingrepairoftheanal
sphincterwithmattresssutures..
TheEASisoverlapped,andmattresssuturesof2.0PDSareusedto
approximatetheends(Fig.15-5).

FIGURE15-5Externalanalsphincteroverlapped.
Thetapesareloosenedpriortoskinclosure.
TheedgesofthewoundareapproximatedinaV-shapeorlongitudinally
withinterrupted3.0absorbablemattresssutures.
Thecenterofthewoundcanbeleftopen,asmalldraininserted,orthe
woundcanbeclosed(Fig.15-6).
p.112
p.113
FIGURE15-6Edgesofthewoundapproximated
inaV-shapeorlongitudinallywithinterrupted3-0
absorbablemattresssutures.Thecenterofthewound
isleftopenfordrainage.Theperinealbodyisbulkier
thanitwaspreoperatively.

POSTOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
Postoperativemanagementrequireskeepingthestoolssoft,thearea
clean,andpaintolerable.Patientsareretainedovernight1–2days.There
isnoconsensusontheroutineadministrationofpostoperativeoral
antibioticsatdischarge.Twosmall,randomizedcontrolledtrials,onein
primaryrepairofanalsphincterinjuryandtheotherfordelayedrepair,
showedthatmaintainingthepatientnothingbymouthandconstipated
doesnothaveanyprovenbenefit.However,wefeelthatitiscrucialto
ensurethatthepatientdoesnotpassahardstoolintheimmediate
postoperativeperiodasthatcandisruptthefreshrepair.Thus,attention
tobowelhabitsisimportant,andthepatientistypicallydischargedona
stoolsoftener.Onerandomizedcontrolledtrialshowednoadvantageto
postoperativebowelconfinement.

COMPLICATIONS
Asreportedintheliterature,complicationratesrangefrom8%to31%of
patients.Earlycomplicationsmayincludetheformationofahematoma
orseromathatcanbetreatedbyopeningthewoundandevacuatingthe
hematomaorseroma,andfecalimpaction,whichcancausedisruptionof
therepair.Latecomplicationsincludeabscessformation,fistulas,and
woundbreakdown.Abscessesrequiredrainage,woundbreakdown
usuallyhealssecondarily,andrarelydoesthisrequiresecondary
suturing.Thepatient’smaincomplaintafterthesurgeryispainfromthe
perinealwound.Othercomplicationsreportedintheliteratureinclude
urinarytractinfection(UTI),urinaryretention,bleeding,andotherrare
complicationssuchasdeepvenousthrombosis(DVT)andpneumonia.

RESULTS
Earlysymptomimprovement(upto90%)isnotedaftersphincteroplasty.
However,5-and10-yearfollow-upsrevealadeclineincontinenceand
increasingfecalaccidentswithareturntobaseline.Itisdifficultto
compareamongseriesbecausemanyareretrospective,surgical
techniquevaries,andthepatientpopulationisheterogeneousasdepicted
inTable15-1.
p.113
p.114
TABLE15-1 SphincteroplastySeries
References N
Ageat
surgery,
mean
(ranges)
FU,mean
(ranges) Long-termoutcomes
Gibbsand
Hooks(1993)
33 47(20–74) 43(4–114)
Good/excellent(73%)
10/33Reliablecontrolofliquid
andsolidstool
14/33Occasionallossofliquid
stoolorgas
Karouietal.
(2000)
74 52.9(21–
85)
40
21/74(28%)Totallycontinent
17/74(23%)Incontinentofgas
36/74(49%)Incontinentoffeces
Maloufetal.
(2000)
46 43(26–67) 77(60–96)
23/46(50%)Eithernoneor
monthlyorless-frequenturge
fecalincontinence
4continentofsolidandliquid
stool
Nopatientfullycontinent
Buieetal.
(2001)
158 36(20–74) 43(6–120)
97/158(61%)Excellentorgood
results
36/158Completelycontinent
61/158Gasincontinenceormild
stain
42/158(27%)Pador
incontinencelessthanonceper

month
19/158(12%)Incontinence
greaterthanoncepermonth
Halversonand
Hull(2002)
44 38.5(22–
80)
*
62.5(47–
141)
*
6/44(14%)Completely
continent
18/44(41%)Continentofliquid
andsolidstool
16/44(36%)Bestpossible
quality-of-lifescore
Barisicetal.
(2006)
56 35.9(18–
64)
80.1(26–
154)
27/56(48%)Excellentorgood
outcomes
7/56(13%)Fairoutcomes
22/56(39%)Pooroutcomes
Bravo
Gutierrezet
al.(2004)
130 37 120(84–
192)
8/130(6%)Completely
continent
21/130(16%)Incontinentofgas
only
25/130(19%)Soiling
74/130(57%)Incontinentof
solidstool
Zorcoloetal.
(2005)
73 56(27–
80)
*
73(48–
112)
2/73(3%)Completelycontinent
50/73(68%)Incontinentofgas
21/73(29%)Incontinentof
liquidstool
18/73(25%)Incontinentofsolid
stool
Note,somepatientshave
numerousformsofincontinence
11/73(22%)Failureleadingto
gracilisneosphincteror
colostomy
Greyetal.
(2007)
47 46(22–80) 60+
28/47(60%)Improved
continence
17/47(36%)Initiallyimproved,
butsincedeteriorated
2/47(4%)Unchanged
Zutshi(2009) 31 44(22–80) 129(113–
208)
Nopatientscompletely
continent
Nopatientscontinentofliquid
andsolidstool
Oometal. 120 58(30– 111(12–
44/120(37%)Excellentorgood

(2009) 85)
*,†
207) outcomes
7/120Excellentoutcomes
37/120Goodoutcomes
28/120(23%)Moderate
outcomes
48/120(40%)Pooroutcome—
lessthan50%reductionof
incontinentepisodesandnot
satisfiedwiththeirsituation
Johnsonetal.
(2010)
33 36(22–
75)
*
103(62–
162)
*
19/33(58%)Excellentorgood
outcomes
3/33(9%)Fullycontinent
16/33(49%)Improved
14/33(42%)Incontinence
unchangedorworse
Lehtoetal.
(2013)
34 51.6(30–
79)
††
89.3(74.6–
104.2)
MedianWexnerscore
Preop11.8
Shortterm9.5
Longterm12.0
Lessthan30%reported
improvementinsymptomsof
solid,liquid,andflatus
incontinence
Lamblinetal.
(2014)
20 52(36–
67)
*
87(54.2–
117.8)
Nopatientscontinentforgas
Initialresults:
85%continentforsolidstool
70%continentforliquidstool
Only48%maintained
continenceat84months
*
Resultsreportedasmedian.
†
Ageatfollow-up.
††
Unknownifageatsurgeryorfollow-up.

CONCLUSIONS
Overlappingsphincterrepairremainsthetreatmentofchoiceforpatients
withEASdefects.Itisimportanttocounselpatientsthatforoverlapping
sphincterrepairandallotherinterventionsforFI,itisraretoachieve
perfectcontinence.Inaddition,thereisadeclineincontinenceovertime
thatmayoccurbecauseoftheweakeningofthemuscleduetonormal
agingorbreakdownoftherepair.Whenpatientshaverecurrent
symptomsofFIafteraninitialsuccessfulrepair,reevaluationisbeneficial
andoptionssuchasredosphincteroplastyandSNSorradiofrequency
tissueremodelingmaybeoffered.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
