Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_953_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
FIGURE19-7A–D.Suturingthesling.Thelimbsofthe
slingareoverlapped.Then,atotalofthreetofive2-0Prolene suturesareplacedacrosstheslingintworows.
FIGURE19-8Tighteningthesling.Theslingis
overlapped,tightenedtoapointwhereadigitalexamination canbeeasilyperformedandsecuredtoitselfwithsutures.
FIGURE19-9Closureofthewounds.Theexcesssling
materialiscutabovethesuturesandpositionedwithinthe wound.Thetractsareirrigatedwithanantibioticsolution. Then,theincisionsareclosedwithabsorbablesubcuticular sutures.
FIGURE19-10Externalviewaftercompletionofthe
procedure.
POSTOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
Mostpatientscanbedischargedthesamedayorthedayfollowingthe surgery.Duringthehospitalstay,patientsarecloselywatchedforurinary retentionandawoundinfectionorseroma.Perinealwoundcarewith dressingchangesandantibioticointmentareperformedtwotothree timesperday,orasneededtokeepthewoundscleananddry.The patientisimmediatelyresumedonaregulardiet.Abowelregimenwith fiberandlaxatives,ifneeded,isinitiatedtoavoiddiarrhea,constipation, andfecalimpaction.Thereturnofbowelfunctionneedstobe documented,andthequalityofthestoolmonitored,asconstipationor fecalimpactioncancompromisethesling,anddiarrheaincreases perinealcareissues.

COMPLICATIONS

Thereareafewcomplicationswiththesilasticslinganalencirclement,all ofwhichhavesimplesolutions.Earlycomplicationsincludeurinary retentionandpostoperativebleeding,whichareunusualandmanaged withsupportivecare.Theencirclementprocedurefixesthesizeofthe analopening.Thus,iftheslingwasplacedtootight,thepatientmaynot beabletoevacuateandcansufferfromfecalimpaction.Inthiscase,a disimpactionmayneedtobedonewithsedation.Iftheslingwasplaced tooloose,thepatientmayreprolapse.Ifthisoccurs,theprocedurecanbe repeatedsimplybyplacinganotherrowofsuturestotightenthesling. Althoughrare,spontaneousbreakoftheslingcanoccur,usuallyatthe fourthtoseventhpostoperativedayinpatientswithpostoperativefailure toevacuate.Theslingcanbereplacedunderlocalanesthesiainthis situation.Latecomplicationsincludeskinerosionandlocalizedinfection. Infectionismanifestedbypain,erythema,and/ordrainagefromthe incisionsites.Erosionismanifestedbylocalskinchangesandperineal pain.Themostcommonlocationisalongtherectovaginalseptum anteriorly.Ifthereiserosionorinfection,theslingcanberemovedoften intheofficeoratthebedsidebygrasping,cutting,andthenpullingoneof theendsoftheslingwithgentletraction.

RESULTS

Recentreportsoftheoutcomesfromanalencirclementproceduresare scarce.Theprocedurewasinitiallydescribedwithwire,andsubsequent erosionandremovalrateswerehigh,limitingwidespreadutilization. Withtheshifttosilasticorinertmaterials,lesstissuereactionand infectionensues.Thus,complicationsaresignificantlylowerthanthose describedintheinitialstudies.However,astheprocedureisusually performedonelderly,comorbid,andnursinghomepatients,follow-up andcompleteevaluationofoutcomesisdifficulttoperform.Inour institution,a10-yearretrospectivereviewof55patientswasperformed. Eighty-sevenpercentofanalencirclementprocedureswereperformedfor prolapse,whereas13%wereforfecalincontinence.Earlycomplications werefecalimpaction(n=4)andinfection(n=2).Duringthestudy period,onlyfivepatientshadinfectionorerosion.Inthesecases,the slingwassimplyremoved.Iftheslingwasworking,patientswerenot usuallyseen.Inthispatientpopulationunfitformoreinvasive procedures,theanalencirclementwithasilasticslingwasproventobea safe,feasible,andeffectiveoption.

CONCLUSIONS

Thesilasticslingencirclementisamethodforperinealrepairofrectal prolapse.Thisprocedureismostcommoninelderly,frailpatients,where anabdominalprocedureisahighrisk.Becausetheprocedurecanbe performedinminutesandwithoutgeneralanesthesia,itisfavoredinour institutionoverotherperinealprocedures,suchastheAltemeieror DeLormeprocedures.Complicationsarerare,minor,andminimized owingtothesimplicityoftheprocedure,wherethereisnobowel resectionoranastomosis.Withtheagingofthepopulationandlimited options,theanalencirclementprocedureisasafeandefficientwayto treatrectalprolapseanditsassociatedincontinenceandsymptoms.
RECOMMENDEDREFERENCESAND READINGS
BachooP,BrazzelliM,GrantA.Surgeryforcompleterectalprolapseinadults.Cochrane
DatabaseSystRev2000;(2):CD001758.
HornHR,SchoetzDJJr,CollerJA,VeidenheimerMC.SphincterrepairwithaSilasticslingfor
analincontinenceandrectalprocidentia.DisColonRectum1985;28(11):868–72. KuijpersHC.Treatmentofcompleterectalprolapse:tonarrow,towrap,tosuspend,tofix,to
encircle,toplicateortoresect?WorldJSurg1992;16(5):826–30. LabowSB,HoexterB,MosesonMD,RubinRJ,SalvatiEP,EisenstatTE.Modificationofsilastic
slingrepairforrectalprocidentiaandanalincontinence.DisColonRectum1985;28(9):684–5. LarachSW,VazquezB.ModifiedThierschprocedurewithsilasticmeshimplant:asimplesolution
forfecalincontinenceandsevereprolapse.SouthMedJ1986;79(3):307–9. PikarskyAJ,JooJS,WexnerSD,etal.Recurrentrectalprolapse:whatisthenextgoodoption?
DisColonRectum2000;43(9):1273–6. SainioAP,HalmeLE,HusaAI.Analencirclementwithpolypropylenemeshforrectalprolapse
andincontinence.DisColonRectum1991;34(10):905–8.
Chapter20
PerinealRectosigmoidectomy
JulieAnnVanKoughnett
WhenMilesdescribedrectalprolapseintheearly1900s,heaptlystated that“whenaninternalorganpersistsinanendeavortobecomean externalorgan,itgenerallycausesagreatdealoftrouble.”Full-thickness rectalprolapseaffectsawiderangeofpatients.Theclinicalimpactcanbe devastating,causinganorectalpain,mucusseepage,bleeding,impaired physicalactivityandincontinence.Manypeoplewithrectalprolapse avoidphysicalandsocialactivitiesduetothediscomfortand embarrassmentassociatedwiththefeelingofanexternalmassand discharge.Onceafull-thicknessrectalprolapsehasbeendocumentedon physicalexamination,numerousoptionsareavailableforrepairinthe symptomaticpatient.Theperinealrectosigmoidectomy,eponymously namedtheAltemeierprocedure,isonesuchsurgicaloption.
INDICATIONSANDCONTRAINDICATIONS
Ingeneral,surgicalrepairofarectalprolapsemaybeapproachedviaa transabdominaloratransperinealtechnique.Therearenumerous advantagestothetransperinealapproachinmanypatients.Aperineal rectosigmoidectomyprovidesafullthicknessresectionoftheprolapsing rectum.Italsoallowspotentialaccesstothelevatormusclesfora concurrentlevatorplasty,theadvantagesofwhichwillbediscussedin greaterdetaillaterinthechapter.Therearerelativelyfew contraindicationstoaperinealrectosigmoidectomy,butacircumferential full-thicknessrectalprolapseshouldbedemonstratedbeforeembarking onthisprocedure.Thus,thisprocedureisnotappropriateforaninternal intussusceptionorasuspectedrectalprolapse,asakeycomponentofthe operativeprocedureisexternalprolapseoftherectumtotransanally performtheresection.Ashortsegmentprolapsemaybedifficulttorepair throughaperinealrectosigmoidectomy,becauseitmaybechallengingto reproducesuchaprolapseunderanesthesiaandwithoutactivepatient
straining.
Thedecisionbetweenanabdominalandaperinealapproachtorepair ofarectalprolapseismadebasedonpatientpreferenceandpatient comorbidities.Historically,aperinealrectosigmoidectomywasthought toprovidealowerperioperativeriskoptionforrectalprolapserepair,at theexpenseofahigherrecurrencerate,whencomparedwiththe abdominalapproach.Morerecentstudieswouldsuggestthatthe recurrencerateisacceptableforbothapproachesandlikelynotas significantlydifferentbetweenthetwoapproachesaswasoncethought. Forpatientswhohavehadpriorabdominalsurgeries,aperineal rectosigmoidectomywilllikelybeafastersurgerywithlowerriskof intraoperativeinjurytootherstructuressuchassmallbowel,when comparedwithatransabdominalrectopexy.Thehospitalstayisusually limitedto1or2daysafterperinealrectosigmoidectomy,whichisoften shorterthantheabdominalapproachespeciallyifasigmoidresection andrectopexyareperformed.Inthelaparoscopicandenhancedrecovery aftersurgeryeras,hospitalstaysarebecomingshorterinallcases.
Paintendstobeveryeasilycontrolledandissometimesminimalafter perinealrectosigmoidectomy,whichisclearlyimportanttomanypatients whendecidingbetweentheabdominalandperinealapproaches.Inthe medicallyfrailpatient,perinealrectosigmoidectomyisoften recommendedandiscertainlyappealingformanyreasons.Avoidingthe potentialmorbidityofanabdominalincisionaspartofarectopexyora resectionwithrectopexyisnotinsignificantinmanypatients; specifically,thoseatriskofsurgicalsiteinfections,the immunosuppressed,diabetic,ortobaccosmokers.Patientswhoare anticipatedtohavedifficultpostoperativepaincontrolmayalsowishto avoidthediscomfortoflaparoscopyorlaparotomy.Tothatend,perineal rectosigmoidectomycanbeperformedunderspinalorepidural anesthetic,avoidingageneralanestheticaltogether.Fortheelderlyor medicallyfrailpatientswhorepresentalargeproportionofpatients seekingrepairofrectalprolapse,aperinealrectosigmoidectomyisoften themostdesiredandmedicallysoundapproachtoavoidadverse physiologiceffectsandmorbidity.Itshouldbenoted,though,that perinealrectosigmoidectomymayalsobeappealingtoyoungpatients withrectalprolapsewhowishtoavoidextendedrecoverytimeandpelvic dissection.Ayoungmale,forexample,withrectalprolapsemayconsider thepotentialnerveandfertilityeffectsofapelvicdissectionandtimeoff workforrecoverywhendecidingontreatment.
p.149
p.150
Incarceratedrectalprolapse,withorwithoutstarngulation,canbea