Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_953_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Dedication
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Technique
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Results
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Anatomy
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications


FIGURE19-7A–D.Suturingthesling.Thelimbsofthe
slingareoverlapped.Then,atotalofthreetofive2-0Prolene
suturesareplacedacrosstheslingintworows.
FIGURE19-8Tighteningthesling.Theslingis
overlapped,tightenedtoapointwhereadigitalexamination
canbeeasilyperformedandsecuredtoitselfwithsutures.

FIGURE19-9Closureofthewounds.Theexcesssling
materialiscutabovethesuturesandpositionedwithinthe
wound.Thetractsareirrigatedwithanantibioticsolution.
Then,theincisionsareclosedwithabsorbablesubcuticular
sutures.
FIGURE19-10Externalviewaftercompletionofthe
procedure.

POSTOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
Mostpatientscanbedischargedthesamedayorthedayfollowingthe
surgery.Duringthehospitalstay,patientsarecloselywatchedforurinary
retentionandawoundinfectionorseroma.Perinealwoundcarewith
dressingchangesandantibioticointmentareperformedtwotothree
timesperday,orasneededtokeepthewoundscleananddry.The
patientisimmediatelyresumedonaregulardiet.Abowelregimenwith
fiberandlaxatives,ifneeded,isinitiatedtoavoiddiarrhea,constipation,
andfecalimpaction.Thereturnofbowelfunctionneedstobe
documented,andthequalityofthestoolmonitored,asconstipationor
fecalimpactioncancompromisethesling,anddiarrheaincreases
perinealcareissues.

COMPLICATIONS
Thereareafewcomplicationswiththesilasticslinganalencirclement,all
ofwhichhavesimplesolutions.Earlycomplicationsincludeurinary
retentionandpostoperativebleeding,whichareunusualandmanaged
withsupportivecare.Theencirclementprocedurefixesthesizeofthe
analopening.Thus,iftheslingwasplacedtootight,thepatientmaynot
beabletoevacuateandcansufferfromfecalimpaction.Inthiscase,a
disimpactionmayneedtobedonewithsedation.Iftheslingwasplaced
tooloose,thepatientmayreprolapse.Ifthisoccurs,theprocedurecanbe
repeatedsimplybyplacinganotherrowofsuturestotightenthesling.
Althoughrare,spontaneousbreakoftheslingcanoccur,usuallyatthe
fourthtoseventhpostoperativedayinpatientswithpostoperativefailure
toevacuate.Theslingcanbereplacedunderlocalanesthesiainthis
situation.Latecomplicationsincludeskinerosionandlocalizedinfection.
Infectionismanifestedbypain,erythema,and/ordrainagefromthe
incisionsites.Erosionismanifestedbylocalskinchangesandperineal
pain.Themostcommonlocationisalongtherectovaginalseptum
anteriorly.Ifthereiserosionorinfection,theslingcanberemovedoften
intheofficeoratthebedsidebygrasping,cutting,andthenpullingoneof
theendsoftheslingwithgentletraction.

RESULTS
Recentreportsoftheoutcomesfromanalencirclementproceduresare
scarce.Theprocedurewasinitiallydescribedwithwire,andsubsequent
erosionandremovalrateswerehigh,limitingwidespreadutilization.
Withtheshifttosilasticorinertmaterials,lesstissuereactionand
infectionensues.Thus,complicationsaresignificantlylowerthanthose
describedintheinitialstudies.However,astheprocedureisusually
performedonelderly,comorbid,andnursinghomepatients,follow-up
andcompleteevaluationofoutcomesisdifficulttoperform.Inour
institution,a10-yearretrospectivereviewof55patientswasperformed.
Eighty-sevenpercentofanalencirclementprocedureswereperformedfor
prolapse,whereas13%wereforfecalincontinence.Earlycomplications
werefecalimpaction(n=4)andinfection(n=2).Duringthestudy
period,onlyfivepatientshadinfectionorerosion.Inthesecases,the
slingwassimplyremoved.Iftheslingwasworking,patientswerenot
usuallyseen.Inthispatientpopulationunfitformoreinvasive
procedures,theanalencirclementwithasilasticslingwasproventobea
safe,feasible,andeffectiveoption.

CONCLUSIONS
Thesilasticslingencirclementisamethodforperinealrepairofrectal
prolapse.Thisprocedureismostcommoninelderly,frailpatients,where
anabdominalprocedureisahighrisk.Becausetheprocedurecanbe
performedinminutesandwithoutgeneralanesthesia,itisfavoredinour
institutionoverotherperinealprocedures,suchastheAltemeieror
DeLormeprocedures.Complicationsarerare,minor,andminimized
owingtothesimplicityoftheprocedure,wherethereisnobowel
resectionoranastomosis.Withtheagingofthepopulationandlimited
options,theanalencirclementprocedureisasafeandefficientwayto
treatrectalprolapseanditsassociatedincontinenceandsymptoms.

RECOMMENDEDREFERENCESAND
READINGS
BachooP,BrazzelliM,GrantA.Surgeryforcompleterectalprolapseinadults.Cochrane
DatabaseSystRev2000;(2):CD001758.
HornHR,SchoetzDJJr,CollerJA,VeidenheimerMC.SphincterrepairwithaSilasticslingfor
analincontinenceandrectalprocidentia.DisColonRectum1985;28(11):868–72.
KuijpersHC.Treatmentofcompleterectalprolapse:tonarrow,towrap,tosuspend,tofix,to
encircle,toplicateortoresect?WorldJSurg1992;16(5):826–30.
LabowSB,HoexterB,MosesonMD,RubinRJ,SalvatiEP,EisenstatTE.Modificationofsilastic
slingrepairforrectalprocidentiaandanalincontinence.DisColonRectum1985;28(9):684–5.
LarachSW,VazquezB.ModifiedThierschprocedurewithsilasticmeshimplant:asimplesolution
forfecalincontinenceandsevereprolapse.SouthMedJ1986;79(3):307–9.
PikarskyAJ,JooJS,WexnerSD,etal.Recurrentrectalprolapse:whatisthenextgoodoption?
DisColonRectum2000;43(9):1273–6.
SainioAP,HalmeLE,HusaAI.Analencirclementwithpolypropylenemeshforrectalprolapse
andincontinence.DisColonRectum1991;34(10):905–8.

Chapter20
PerinealRectosigmoidectomy
JulieAnnVanKoughnett
WhenMilesdescribedrectalprolapseintheearly1900s,heaptlystated
that“whenaninternalorganpersistsinanendeavortobecomean
externalorgan,itgenerallycausesagreatdealoftrouble.”Full-thickness
rectalprolapseaffectsawiderangeofpatients.Theclinicalimpactcanbe
devastating,causinganorectalpain,mucusseepage,bleeding,impaired
physicalactivityandincontinence.Manypeoplewithrectalprolapse
avoidphysicalandsocialactivitiesduetothediscomfortand
embarrassmentassociatedwiththefeelingofanexternalmassand
discharge.Onceafull-thicknessrectalprolapsehasbeendocumentedon
physicalexamination,numerousoptionsareavailableforrepairinthe
symptomaticpatient.Theperinealrectosigmoidectomy,eponymously
namedtheAltemeierprocedure,isonesuchsurgicaloption.
INDICATIONSANDCONTRAINDICATIONS
Ingeneral,surgicalrepairofarectalprolapsemaybeapproachedviaa
transabdominaloratransperinealtechnique.Therearenumerous
advantagestothetransperinealapproachinmanypatients.Aperineal
rectosigmoidectomyprovidesafullthicknessresectionoftheprolapsing
rectum.Italsoallowspotentialaccesstothelevatormusclesfora
concurrentlevatorplasty,theadvantagesofwhichwillbediscussedin
greaterdetaillaterinthechapter.Therearerelativelyfew
contraindicationstoaperinealrectosigmoidectomy,butacircumferential
full-thicknessrectalprolapseshouldbedemonstratedbeforeembarking
onthisprocedure.Thus,thisprocedureisnotappropriateforaninternal
intussusceptionorasuspectedrectalprolapse,asakeycomponentofthe
operativeprocedureisexternalprolapseoftherectumtotransanally
performtheresection.Ashortsegmentprolapsemaybedifficulttorepair
throughaperinealrectosigmoidectomy,becauseitmaybechallengingto
reproducesuchaprolapseunderanesthesiaandwithoutactivepatient

straining.
Thedecisionbetweenanabdominalandaperinealapproachtorepair
ofarectalprolapseismadebasedonpatientpreferenceandpatient
comorbidities.Historically,aperinealrectosigmoidectomywasthought
toprovidealowerperioperativeriskoptionforrectalprolapserepair,at
theexpenseofahigherrecurrencerate,whencomparedwiththe
abdominalapproach.Morerecentstudieswouldsuggestthatthe
recurrencerateisacceptableforbothapproachesandlikelynotas
significantlydifferentbetweenthetwoapproachesaswasoncethought.
Forpatientswhohavehadpriorabdominalsurgeries,aperineal
rectosigmoidectomywilllikelybeafastersurgerywithlowerriskof
intraoperativeinjurytootherstructuressuchassmallbowel,when
comparedwithatransabdominalrectopexy.Thehospitalstayisusually
limitedto1or2daysafterperinealrectosigmoidectomy,whichisoften
shorterthantheabdominalapproachespeciallyifasigmoidresection
andrectopexyareperformed.Inthelaparoscopicandenhancedrecovery
aftersurgeryeras,hospitalstaysarebecomingshorterinallcases.
Paintendstobeveryeasilycontrolledandissometimesminimalafter
perinealrectosigmoidectomy,whichisclearlyimportanttomanypatients
whendecidingbetweentheabdominalandperinealapproaches.Inthe
medicallyfrailpatient,perinealrectosigmoidectomyisoften
recommendedandiscertainlyappealingformanyreasons.Avoidingthe
potentialmorbidityofanabdominalincisionaspartofarectopexyora
resectionwithrectopexyisnotinsignificantinmanypatients;
specifically,thoseatriskofsurgicalsiteinfections,the
immunosuppressed,diabetic,ortobaccosmokers.Patientswhoare
anticipatedtohavedifficultpostoperativepaincontrolmayalsowishto
avoidthediscomfortoflaparoscopyorlaparotomy.Tothatend,perineal
rectosigmoidectomycanbeperformedunderspinalorepidural
anesthetic,avoidingageneralanestheticaltogether.Fortheelderlyor
medicallyfrailpatientswhorepresentalargeproportionofpatients
seekingrepairofrectalprolapse,aperinealrectosigmoidectomyisoften
themostdesiredandmedicallysoundapproachtoavoidadverse
physiologiceffectsandmorbidity.Itshouldbenoted,though,that
perinealrectosigmoidectomymayalsobeappealingtoyoungpatients
withrectalprolapsewhowishtoavoidextendedrecoverytimeandpelvic
dissection.Ayoungmale,forexample,withrectalprolapsemayconsider
thepotentialnerveandfertilityeffectsofapelvicdissectionandtimeoff
workforrecoverywhendecidingontreatment.
p.149
p.150
Incarceratedrectalprolapse,withorwithoutstarngulation,canbea
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
