Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5196_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
62 Мб
Скачать
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
327
To determine the equivalent dose rate (specified in µSv/hr at a particular distance from a person injected with a specific amount of 18F), the shielding planner must make use of a “measured” quantity called the dose rate constant. Its value is 6.96 µSv/hr at a distance of 1 m per mCi of 18F. Thus, if the patient did not self-attenuate any of the 18F radiation, then just after a 15-mCi injec­tion, the equivalent dose rate 1 m away would be ap­proximately 7 3 15 5 105 µSv/hr. At greater distances, the inverse square law can be applied to obtain a value. For example, at a separation of 4 meters (approximately 13 feet), the initial high-energy photons’ equivalent dose rate in the absence of any shielding or attenuation reduces to:
2
105/4 6.6 Sv/hr
(0.66 mrem/hr)
Distance is thus seen to be a very powerful tool of radiation protection. A well-designed facility takes espe­cial advantage of this. Returning to the injected patient, there are other facilitators of radiation protection at hand. Both the patient and nature are responsible for this. It has been found from multiple measurements that the body can absorb a substantial amount of 18F annihilation radiation.
Thus the mean maximum equivalent dose rate at 1 m from the patient per mCi (37 MBq) injected just after the injection is not 6.96 µSv/hr, as it would be for an unshielded point source of radiation; rather, it has been determined to be approximately 3 µSv/hr per mCi due to average patient self-attenuation.1 At a distance of 4 m from the patient just after a 15 mCi injection, the equivalent dose rate is now given from the inverse square law by:
(15 3)/4 2.8 Sv/hr
2
Nature’s contribution to the radiation protection effort is that 18F has a short half-life. Therefore, the 15 mCi dose injected at 2:00 p.m. will, because of natu­ral radiation decay, be approximately 69%* as strong 60 minutes later for a 3:00 p.m. scan starting time. In actuality, the equivalent dose delivered by the “hot” pa­tient while waiting during the prep time at a distance of 4 m is less than 2.8 µSv because of the continuing
*Radioactive decay factor after a full 60 minutes is obtained from
–(0.693 3 60/110)
(e
) 5 0.69.
decrease of the Fluorine-18 activity. If not 2.8 µSv, then what dose equivalent would a person at this 4 m dis­tance on average receive in 60 minutes? It must be some percentage that lies between 100% and 69% of 2.8. Using the mathematics of radioactive decay** yields an average value of approximately 83%, or a correction factor of 0.83. Consequently, the equivalent dose at a distance of 4 m that could be received by a technologist who is continuously present at this 4 m location (i.e., occupancy level T 5 1) from a 1-hour prep patient in the absence of any added shielding is:
0.83 2.8 2.3 Sv
Over the course of a week, assuming a total of 35 patients, then, with all other conditions remaining the same, this technologist will accumulate from prep patients an equivalent dose of:
35 2.3 81 Sv (8.1 millirem)
Over 50 weeks, this would add up to about 4000 µSv (400 mrem) from prep patients alone. However, prep pa­tients are not the only sources of high-energy radiation dose to PET-CT personnel. There is also the scan patient and, to a much lesser extent, the patient’s toilet and the hot lab. The contributions of all sources of radiation dose need to be factored into the facility’s design and shielding plan.
Consider the scan patient in some detail. As always, it is desirable to have a good distance, if at all possible, between personnel and the radiation source. That is usually not feasible especially if the PET-CT suite is be­ing fit into a preexisting area. So, considering the scanned patient first, let it be assumed that there is a separation of only 3.3 m from the scan patient’s midline to the location of the PET-CT technologist. In the ab­sence of additional shielding, what could be the equiva­lent dose rate from this patient? The first factor to be aware of is the lesser activity remaining in the patient due to physical decay, namely about 69% of the original 15 mCi. However, this is not the whole story. The prep patient is encouraged to void just before being scanned. What this means is that the residual 18F in the patient’s body at the start of the scan is less than 69% of the original activity. If it is assumed that approximately
**Average Decay correction factor over a period of 60 minutes 5 [1.443 3 (110/60) 3 (12 0.69)] 0.83 where 1.443 3 110 minutes is the average lifetime of the Fluorine-18 nucleus in a radioactive sample.
328
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
20% more was removed by voiding, then at the start of the scan, the activity within the patient is roughly just 50% of the original activity, namely: 0.5 3 15 5 7.5 mCi. If there were no other considerations,* then at the start of the scan the equivalent dose rate at the location of the technologist with no shielding would be:
µµSv
hr
2
µµ(7.5 mCi 3 per mCi)/(3.3) 2 Sv/hr
(0.2 mrem/hr)
However, the radioactivity within the patient contin­ues to decay all throughout the approximate 1 hour between voiding and their departure. Therefore, the mean equivalent dose to the technologist from the scanned patient during this additional hour of isotope decay, as determined before, will actually be 0.83 3 2 µSv/hr, 5 1.7 µSv. Over the course of a week, this approximately amounts to: 35 patients 3 1.7 5 60 µSv. At 50 weeks, this totals 3000 µSv (300 mrem). Then, the
*In this discussion, any degree of shielding provided by the scanner itself is being neglected.
PET/CT
control
room
3.3 meters
View window
unshielded technologist could receive an annual equiva­lent dose of 4000 1 3000 5 7000 µSv (700 mrem) in this facility from the prep and scan FDG patients. Shielding can be installed to decrease this amount significantly. As an exercise, determining how much shielding would need to be installed to reduce this technologist equiva­lent dose of 7000 µSv to a total of 1300 µSv (130 mrem) per year or about 110 µSv/month (11 mrem/mo.) will be discussed. The value used in this example is far below the occupational annual maximum permissible dose (MPD) of 0.05 Sv (5 rem). Fig. 16.3 depicts a facility layout sche- matic that will be referred to for shielding calculations. For simplicity, the calculations will not be for the entire suite but will be limited to what is required for protection of the PET-CT radiographer. In addition, the task will be further confined to just the contributions from the pa­tient occupying the prep room and the patient being scanned. The hot lab and the patient’s toilet will have to have their own substantial shielding installed to protect other regular facility occupants and the general public.
Beginning with the scanned patient, let it be required
that both the technologist viewing window and the
x~midline of patient
PET/CT scanner
(E) Corridor
Prep.
room
B
5 meters
7 meters
A
Hot
lab
PET
toilet
4 meters
(E) Corridor
D
Fig. 16.3 Layout diagram of a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging facility.
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
329
surrounding wall be shielded so that the 3000 µSv (300 mrem) high-energy annual equivalent dose contri­bution from scan patients decreases to one-fourth of its unshielded value, namely to 750 µSv (75 mrem). As men­tioned earlier, the amount of lead needed to decrease the intensity of this high-energy radiation by 50% (HVL) is equal to 0.5 cm (approximately 0.2 inch) of lead. One HVL will bring the equivalent dose down to 1500 µSv (150 mrem), and two HVLs will decrease it to 750 µSv (75 mrem). The two HVLs amount to installing: 2 3 (0.5 cm) of lead 5 1.0 cm (≈0.4 inches) of lead. This must be placed in the wall surrounding the view window, and the view window itself must be composed of the equiva­lent amount of lead acrylic. This thickness of lead is far more than would be required to shield the operator from the much less penetrating CT scatter radiation (typically about 1/16” Pb). Therefore, the CT scatter radiation does not have to be additionally accounted for. For the patient in the prep room, the goal is to interpose enough shielding so that the 4000 µSv (400 mrem) annual equivalent dose contribution to the technologist location decreases to 500 µSv (50 mrem); this decrease by a factor of eight re­quires three HVLs, or 1.5 cm (0.59 inches) of lead. Exam­ining the diagram, it is seen that this amount of shielding can be distributed between the prep room corridor wall and door (labeled A and D, respectively) and the scan suite corridor wall (labeled B). Excluding personnel other than the operator and discounting any other circumstances, a practical solution is to place ½0 of lead in A and D and add 1/80 of lead in the portion of B necessary to shield the technologist. This amounting to installing: 0.50 1 0.130 5
0.630 which is close enough to the calculated 0.590 Pb.
In conclusion, it is clear that there is much to be considered when radiation shielding is designed for a PET-CT facility. Other areas that are frequented by per­sonnel and/or the general public must also be protected from the high-energy radiation. Their protection in­volves lower permissible equivalent dose limits than for the occupationally exposed radiographer. If there is the opportunity to construct the facility from the begin­ning, then with an intelligent design the required shield­ing can be greatly reduced; if not, then the calculations and the amount and variations of needed shielding can be sizable.

RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY (RIT)

In formal terms, RIT is a specific treatment protocol for cancer by cytotoxic radioisotopes conjugated to special­ized immune system antibodies. In the following, this statement will be explained and explored in all of its aspects. By no means, however, is the following meant to be regarded as a complete presentation of this very important and ongoing area of research.

The Immune System

Box 16.1 presents brief explanations of some of the
major organic entities involved in the operations and reactions of the body’s immune system.
The body’s immune system is essentially an alliance between cells and proteins that work together to pro­vide defenses against infection. The immune system is not a single organ but rather a collection of organs dispersed throughout the body whose purpose is to
BOX 16.1 Organic Entities Involved in the Operations and Reactions of the Body’s Immune
System
Antigens are protein molecules that are not recognized by
the body and therefore seen as foreign by the immune system, thereby stimulating the system’s production of antibodies or immune cells.
Antibodies (Ab) are molecules produced by B-lympho-
cytes (white blood cells originating in bone marrow) that circulate in the blood and will chemically bind with and can interact destructively with antigens. These are among the key agents of the body’s im­mune system.
A conjugate refers to a compound formed by the joining
of two or more chemical compounds.
A conjugated antibody (also known as a tagged, loaded,
or labeled antibody) is one that has been attached to a substrate (the surface or material on or from which an organism lives, grows, or obtains its nourishment) such as an enzyme, toxin, or inorganic compound
Monoclonal antibodies (MABs or MoABs) are antibodies
that are made by identical immune cells that are all clones of a unique parent cell. Thus, monoclonal antibodies are cells derived by cell division from a single ancestral cell.
Pathogens are a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism
that can cause disease. A pathogen may also be re­ferred to as an infectious agent, or simply a germ.
330
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
provide rapid responses to foreign agents. It includes organs such as the liver, thymus gland, bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen, and even the tonsils. The bone marrow and thymus gland are important source loca­tions for two key cells of the immune system called B-cells and T-cells, respectively. Box 16.2 contains a listing and description of the various cell types that comprise the immune system. The development of all cells of the immune system begins in the bone marrow with a blood-forming “stem” cell. The name stem cell is appropriate, since all of the other specialized cells arise from it. Because of its ability to generate an entire im­mune system, this blood-forming cell is the cell that is most important in a bone marrow or hematopoietic cell transplant.
Although all components of the immune system in­teract with each other, it is typical to consider two broad categories of immune responses: those originating with
BOX 16.2 Cells of the Immune System
Bone marrow: The site in the body where most of the
cells of the immune system are produced as immature or stem cells.
Stem cells: These cells have the potential to differentiate
and mature into the different cells of the immune system.
Thymus: An organ located in the chest that instructs im-
mature lymphocytes to become mature T-lymphocytes.
Cytotoxic (killer) T-cells: These lymphocytes mature in
the thymus and are responsible for killing infected cells.
Helper T-cells: These specialized lymphocytes “help”
other T-cells and B-cells to perform their functions.
B-cells: These lymphocytes arise in the bone marrow and
differentiate into plasma cells that in turn produce im­munoglobulins (antibodies).
Plasma B-cells: These cells develop from B-cells and are
the cells that make immunoglobulin for the serum and the secretions.
Serum and plasma: Both come from the liquid portion of
the blood that is left over once the blood cells are re­moved. Serum is the liquid that remains after the blood has clotted. Plasma is the liquid that remains when clotting is prevented with the addition of an anticoagulant. Essen­tially, plasma is equal to serum minus clotting agent.
Immunoglobulins (Ig): These highly specialized protein
molecules, also known as antibodies, fit foreign anti­gens, such as polio, like a lock and key. Their variety is so extensive that they can be produced to match all possible microorganisms in our environment.
the innate immune system and those associated with the adaptive immune system.
Innate immune responses rely on cells that require no additional modifications to do their jobs. These cells include neutrophils, natural killer (NK) cells, and a set of proteins termed the complement proteins. Innate re­sponses to infection occur rapidly and reliably. Even infants have exceptional inherent immune responses.
Adaptive immune responses, however, involve T-cells and B-cells, cell types that do require an “educational” modification to prevent them from attacking harmless cells. The advantages of the adaptive responses are their long-lived memory and the ability to adjust to new germs. Central to both categories of immune responses is the ability to distinguish foreign invaders (things that need to be attacked) from the body’s own tissues, which of course need to be protected. Because of their ability to respond rapidly, the innate responses are usually the
Immunoglobulin G (IgG): Representing approximately
75% of serum antibodies in humans, IgG is the most common type of antibody found in blood circulation. IgG molecules are created and released by plasma B-cells.
Neutrophils: A type of white blood cell (leukocytes) that
is one of the first cell types to travel to the site of an infection. Neutrophils help fight infection by ingesting microorganisms and releasing enzymes that kill the microorganisms. Neutrophils are the most plentiful type, making up 55% to 70% of your white blood cells.
Complement proteins: The complement system is a
secondary part of the immune system produced in the liver that enhances the ability of antibodies to clear mi­crobes and damaged cells from an organism, promotes inflammation, and attacks the pathogen’s cell mem­brane. It is essentially a “backup” complex system of more than 30 proteins that, when triggered (caused to be brought into play), act in concert to help eliminate infectious microorganisms. Specifically, the comple- ment system causes the bursting of foreign and in­fected cells and the ingestion of foreign particles.
Red blood cells: The cells in the blood stream that carry
oxygen from the lungs to the tissues.
Platelets: Small cells in the blood stream that are important
in blood clotting.
Dendritic cells: Important cells in presenting antigen to
immune system cells.
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
331
first to react to an “invasion.” This initial response serves to alert and trigger the adaptive response, which can take several days to fully activate.
2

Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (MABs) are antibodies that
have monovalent affinity, which means simply that they preferentially bind always to a specific part of an antigen that is recognized by the antibody. To be more specific, MABs work by identifying and locating specific proteins on cells. Each MAB is attracted to one particular protein of the many that are on the cell. Each works in different ways depending on the foreign-appearing protein (anti­gen) they are targeting (Figs. 16.4 and 16.5).
Specifics of Radioimmunotherapy
RIT is a combination of radiation therapy and immuno­therapy. In basic (i.e., non-RIT) immunotherapy, a labo- ratory-produced specialized antibody is “engineered” to recognize and bind to the surface of cancer cells. These specialized antibodies mimic the antibodies naturally produced by the body’s immune system that attack in­vading foreign substances, such as bacteria and viruses.
Radioimmunotherapy goes a step further and uses such a specialized antibody that is also labeled or chemi­cally combined with a radionuclide to deliver cytotoxic (cell-killing) radiation to a target cell. Thus, for RIT can­cer therapy, a radioactive antibody combination with
Cancer cell
Tumour-specific MABs
Tumour-specific antigens (TSA)
Fig. 16.4 Attack by the immune system on specific protrusions
of a cancer cell. (From Lilley, Harrington, Snyder: Pharmacology for Canadian health care practice, ed 2, Milton, Ontario, 2011,
Elsevier Canada.)
Antigen
Epitope Epitope
Antibody Antibody
Fig. 16.5 Enlarged view of a “lock and key” interaction be-
tween an antibody and a protrusion of a cancer cell recognized as a foreign protein or antigen by the immune system. (From Worsfold P, Poole C, Townshend A, et al: Encyclopedia of ana- lytical science, ed 3, Oxford, 2019, Elsevier Ltd.)
Antigen
specificity for a tumor-associated antigen is used to de­liver a lethal dose of radiation to the tumor cells. The ability of the antibody to preferentially bind (i.e., attach itself) to a tumor-associated antigen increases the radia­tion dose delivered to the tumor cells while decreasing the dose to normal tissues. By its nature, effective RIT, ideally, requires a tumor cell to express or display an antigen that is unique to the neoplasm or is not widely accessible in normal cells. Otherwise, RIT would not be practical. Thus, RIT is very dependent upon there being made available and then using precise focused entities such as monoclonal antibodies.
As an explicit example, an antibody known as an immunoglobulin-G (IgG) is a large, Y-shaped protein (shown in Figs. 16.4 and 16.5), produced mainly by plasma cells, that is employed by the immune system to neutralize germs such as pathogenic bacteria and vi­ruses. IgG is sensitive to a unique molecule or antigen of the pathogen. Each tip of the “Y” of an antibody contains a paratope (analogous to a lock, a paratope is a part of an antibody that recognizes and binds to an antigen) that is specific for one particular structure (similar to a key) on an antigen, allowing these two structures to join together with precision (see Fig. 16.5). Using this binding mechanism, an antibody can mark a microbe or an infected cell for attack by other parts of the immune system, or can neutralize its target directly
332
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
(for example, by inhibiting a part of a microbe that is essential for its invasion and survival). Cancer cells naturally produce cancer-associated biological mole­cules, which are adaptive features of malignant change that possess multiple foreign-appearing (antigenic) binding sites in relatively high abundance in compari­son to normal tissues.
As mentioned before, in RIT a radioactive isotope (typically a short-range, high-energy beta emitter) is chemically bound to a target-specific monoclonal anti­body forming a radioactive conjugate or team that com­bines the excellent targeting specificity of the immune system with the known cancer-killing power of high energy radiotherapy. These radioantibodies are intro­duced into the blood or into a body cavity, such as the peritoneum, pleura, or intrathecal space,* and are sub­sequently carried to the antigen-binding sites or targets on the tumor cells by blood flow, diffusion, or the wholesale flow of fluid. Thus, when injected into the bloodstream, appropriate radionuclide-linked mono­clonal antibodies travel to and bind to cancer cells, cu­mulatively causing a high dose of destructive radiation to be delivered directly to the tumor cells while at the same time limiting radiation effects on neighboring healthy cells. Systemic radiotherapy with radiolabeled immunoconjugates delivers a non-uniform, low-dose rate irradiation over a prolonged period of time, in con­trast to external beam radiotherapy, which is usually engaged for only minutes at a time. RIT thus far has been more successful in hematological cancers than in solid tumors.

Agents of RIT and Their Destructive Capabilities

Radioimmunotherapy drugs that rely upon an alpha particle-emitting isotope (e.g., Bismuth-213 or Actin­ium-225), rather than a beta emitter, as the killing source of radiation tend to be more effective. The most devel­oped drug in this category thus far is directed toward treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML).** Other types of cancer for which RIT has therapeutic potential include prostate cancer, metastatic melanoma, ovarian cancer,
*Describes the fluid-filled space between the thin layers of tis­sue that cover the brain and spinal cord. Drugs can be injected into the fluid or a sample of the fluid.
various types of leukemia, and high-grade brain tumors.
Table 16.1 provides a list of some radioisotopes used or
considered for RIT.
Irradiated cells absorb substantial amounts of energy in the form of photons or charged particles, which pro­mote both direct macromolecular harmful alterations as well as indirect damage due to the generation of reac­tive oxygen and/or nitrogen species (free radicals, etc. See Chapter 7 for a detailed discussion of irradiation­induced molecular changes). Both free radicals and molecular oxygen can alter DNA strands, and the dam­age induces not only the onset of apoptosis (pro­grammed cell death) but also significant necrosis (the death of most or all of the cells in an organ or tissue due to disease, injury, or failure of the blood supply).
For minimizing collateral injury of nearby normal cells from the radiation used for therapy, alpha particle or short-range beta particle emitters are preferable. There have also become available some MABs that are
**Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a cancer of the blood and bone marrow. It is a type of cancer in which the spongy tissue of the bone marrow makes abnormal myeloblasts (a type of white blood cell), red blood cells, or platelets.
TABLE 16.1 Some Radioisotopes Used
and Considered for RIT
Radioisotope Energy (MeV) Range Half-life
Beta-particle emitters
67
Copper 0.58 2.1 mm 2.6 d
90
Yittrium 2.28 12.0 mm 2.7 d
131
Iodine 0.61 2.0 mm 8.0 d
186
Rhenium 1.07 4.5 mm 3.7 d
188
Rhenium 2.12 10.4 mm 16.9 hr
Alpha-particle emitters
211
Astatine 6.8 80 µm 7.2 hr
213
Bismuth 8.3 84 µm 46 min
225
Actinium 6.0,8.0 60,90 µm 10.0 d
Auger-electron emitter
125
Iodine varied 2,500 nm 59.5 d
Data from Kawashima H: Radioimmunotherapy: a specific treatment protocol for cancer by cytotoxic radioisotopes conjugated to antibodies, Sci World J vol. 2014, 2014. doi 10.1155/2014/492061.
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
333
coupled with radioisotopes that emit very short-range Auger electrons (see Chapter 3). Table 16.1 shows some of the radioisotopes that have been or may be utilized for RIT.
Because an alpha particle gives its energy to the surrounding molecules within a very narrow range (,100 mm, equivalent to a few cell diameters), it leads to a much more concentrated energy transfer within the target and therefore less collateral effect to non­target tissues as compared to antibodies labeled with beta emitters. In addition to an alpha particle’s very high linear energy transfer (LET), which results in a large relative biological effectiveness (RBE), the
cytotoxic (cell-killing) efficacy of an alpha particle is independent of the local oxygen concentration and cell cycle state.
The success of RIT depends on the selective accu­mulation of cytotoxic radioisotopes at affected areas. Fundamental properties required for effective agents against a particular bio target are: (1) high binding af­finity to the intended mark, (2) high specificity, (3) high metabolic stability, and (4) low body self-rejection or immunogenicity.* From the viewpoint of those mo­lecular characteristics, MABs have been regarded as very suitable vehicles for the delivery of therapeutic radioisotopes.
One of the most intriguing advantages of RIT over external x-ray beam radiotherapy is the ability to attack not only the primary tumor but also lesions systemi­cally metastasizing or spreading. Thus, targeted radio­therapy treatments using specific vehicle agents can be effective in cases of (1) residual micrometastatic lesions, (2) residual tumor margins after surgical resection, (3) tumors in the circulating blood including
*Today, “biologic” drugs provide more treatment options for various diseases. But even these newer drugs have flaws, because in a small percentage of patients, there is a self-immune
response to the drug
compromised. That undesirable response is called “immuno­genicity.” The challenge for researchers is to develop biologic drugs that don’t provoke that kind of self-immune response, so that all patients can be treated with these medicines. Currently, it is difficult or impossible for physicians to predict which patients are going to end up with an immunogenic response, which makes it tricky to monitor them and prescribe the right treatment.
3
, and so its effectiveness over time may be
hematologic malignancy, and (4) malignancies that present as free-floating cells. Certain types of cancer, therefore, which are not well handled by conventional means (i.e., external x-ray irradiation and/or chemo­therapy), may well have much better potential probabil­ities for resolution with RIT.
4

How RIT Is Performed

A nuclear medicine physician and a radiation oncolo­gist and other health care professionals, such as a medical physicist, a nuclear medicine technologist, and an oncology nurse, usually make up the team in­volved in RIT procedures. In general, a patient will re­ceive a treatment either by an injection under the skin (subcutaneous injection) or through a drip (infusion) into a vein. RIT usually consists of several such proce­dures. For some drugs the first treatment will be into a vein, and then remaining treatments will be delivered subcutaneously. In either way, the “radioantibody” is introduced into the blood or a body cavity such as the peritoneum, pleura, or intrathecal space, and from there it is carried to its natural target or antigen-binding site on the tumor cell by blood flow, diffusion, or the bulk flow of fluid.
In general, for the patient, the most serious and most common side effect of RIT therapy is a decrease in blood counts due to various degrees of unavoidable col­lateral damage. This side effect may be present as late as several months after treatment but can be medically managed.

Radiation Safety Considerations

Because there are multiple drug-radionuclide combi­nations that have been used or are in test trials (all of which have alpha or beta or gamma emissions or some combinations thereof), it is therefore practical for this text’s educational purposes to just consider, as an example, the radiation safety and dosimetry characteristics of one of the most commonly used combinations, namely beta-emitter Yittrium-90 (Y90)*
*Y90 Characteristics: pure beta emitter, decay energy 0.94 MeV, maximum range in tissue 11 mm (2.5 mm average), T
64.2 hours. Two production methods: (1) Nuclear Reactor, (2)
Sr90 / 39Y90 generator [Note: 38Sr90 (Strontium-90) decays by
38
beta decay into 39Y90, which then undergoes beta decay itself yielding an isotope of Zirconium 40Zr90].
1/2 5
334
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
microspheres, ** which are chemically bonded to im- munoglobulin G (IgG). Representing approximately
75% of blood plasma antibodies in humans, IgG is the most common type of antibody found in the blood circulation. IgG molecules are created and released by plasma B cells (see Box 16.2).
A practical and efficient agent for the above mixture is Yttrium-90 joined with the immunoglobulin Ibritu­momab Tiuxetan (trade-name Zevalin). For Zevalin, other than acrylic shielding around the syringe, only standard universal precautions for personnel are required to administer the drug, and strict patient isolation is unnecessary because of the significant self-absorption of the emitted radiation by the patient’s body in general. After the radiolabeled antibodies bind to receptors/ tumor antigens expressed on the surface of cancerous tissue, cells within an anatomic region reached by the radioactive emissions (beta particles in the case of Y90) will be killed.
RIT with Zevalin is currently most often used to treat non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma*** (NHL) for newly diagnosed patients and for patients who have not re­sponded to chemotherapy procedures.
5
Patients who have had prior bone marrow transplan­tation or failed stem cell collection should not receive RIT. Y90-microsphere treatment is a multiple interdisci­plinary treatment modality. Treatment planning and execution can jointly involve interventional radiology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine. Microbrachy-
**A microsphere is a spherical shell that is usually made of a biodegradable or resorbable plastic polymer, that has a very small diameter, customarily in the micron or nanometer range, and that is often filled with a substance (such as a drug or antibody or radionuclide conjugated to an antibody) for release as the shell is degraded. ***Both Hodgkin’s lymphoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma are types of cancer that begin in a subset of white blood cells (lymphocytes). Lymphoma can develop when lymphocytes (white blood cells that fight infection) grow out of control. This is brought about by genetic changes in the cells that cause them to no longer “listen” to signals that control their growth and death. The main difference between Hodgkin’s lymphoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is in the specific lymphocyte each involves. If in examining the cells under a microscope there is detected the presence of a specific type of abnormal cell called a Reed-Sternberg cell (large multi-nucleus cells), the lymphoma is classified as Hodgkin’s.
therapy, a term used by radiation oncologists, originates from the approval of Y90 microspheres by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as medical devices. The actual use of Y90 microspheres, however, is as a radiopharmaceutical. The material is prepared in a solution and its activity is assayed in a nuclear medicine dose calibrator. The treatment prescription is specified in units of activity (typically gigabecquerels (GBq) or mCi). Absorbed dose to the tumor target is not used in the treatment prescription. The agent is administered by use of a syringe or injector via a catheter into an artery. For Zevalin, there is, however, some radiation that is detectable outside of the patient’s body, which can lead to exposures of others at close distances. It is caused by an escaping bremsstrahlung radiation component due to high-energy electrons interacting with larger-atomic-number materials in the patient, such as bone. Consequently, it is recommended that treated patients generally maintain at least a 1 meter distance from others, especially young children and pregnant women for over a week (multiple half-lives of Y90) after application of Zevalin. Furthermore, the beta radiation component, almost entirely absorbed by the body, can, however, in the case of a nursing mother via breast milk ingestion compromise a nursing infant, and consequently nursing should cease for at least five half-lives of Y90 (about 2 weeks). Microspheres typically measure between 20 and 30 microns in diameter and are infused with Y90 at a specific activity of 2400 to 2700 Bq per sphere. Typical total treatment activities are in the range of 2 to 6 GBq (approximately 50 to 160 mCi).*
Y90 microsphere therapy is regulated by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC), pursuant to 10 CFR
35.1000, and patient release must follow the require­ments in 10 CFR 35.75. A licensee may release patients, regardless of administered activity to that patient, if it can be demonstrated that the total effective dose equiva- lent (TEDE) to another individual from exposure to a released patient is not likely to exceed 5 mSv (0.5 rem). In addition, pursuant to 10 CFR part 35.75(b), licensees must provide a released patient with written instructions on actions recommended to maintain ALARA doses to
*1 GBq 5 109 disintegrations per second (dps). This is equiv­alent to 27 millicuries since 1 mCi 5 3.7(10)7 dps.
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
335
other individuals if the dose to any other individual is likely to exceed 1 mSv.
For radiation safety regulatory purposes, only the bremsstrahlung radiation component is considered here, because the involved direct beta dose would be negligible. The following empirical equation can be used to estimate the total dose that an individual is likely to receive from exposure to a released patient at a distance r measured in centimeters:
∞∞
DDEE(( )) ((3344..66 AA TT OOFF))// rr **
ΓΓ 5
pp
22
where in this equation: DE () is external exposure dose equivalent, attributable to bremsstrahlung radiation, up to total decay (i.e., out to infinite time) in mSv; is the specific bremsstrahlung equivalent dose rate constant** for Y90 in soft tissue equal to 1.52 3 10-3 mSv/cm2/MBq/ hr at 1 cm; A is the administered activity in megabecquer­els (MBq); Tp is the physical half-life of the radionuclide in days (2.67 days for Y90); OF is the assumed practical occupancy factor at 100 cm (0.25); and r is distance from the patient in centimeters.
6
This equation can be used to calculate a projected potential TEDE to a family member who for a quarter of the time of the implant duration maintains a distance of 1 m from a patient who has received a treatment dos­age of 6 GBq (162 mCi). The family member is assumed
*The equation can be considered to be an approximation be­cause it was derived under the idealized assumptions of in­stantaneous patient activity uptake, uniform activity deposi­tion through the patient, and no biologic elimination. It can be solved for the maximum allowable administered activity for authorizing patient release on the basis of the 5 mSv (500 mrem) regulatory dose limit. In compliance with the public dose limit in 10 CFR 35.75(a), licensees may release patients from their control if the activity administered to each treated patient is no greater than 1420 GBq. Patient instructions are required only if the dose to other individuals is likely to exceed 1 mSv (0.1 rem). This dose equivalent would correspond to one-fifth of the maximum allowable release value, corre­sponding to an administered activity of 284 GBq. Since all patients treated with 90Y-microspheres receive a treatment activity that is enormously lower than this value, all such pa­tients can be released; no records or instructions are required by the NRC. **An experimentally determined value based upon the mean bremsstrahlung energy.
7,8
to spend negligible time closer to the patient than 100 cm. Substituting into the equation the various parame­ter values yields:
3
TEDE (family member) 34. 6 1.52(10)
6000 2.67 0.25/(100)
2
5 0.022 mSv (2.2 mrem)
Although the 6 GBq or 162 mCi dosage is greater than the normal Y90 dosage used (see below), it is seen to produce a TEDE to an informed family member that is substantially below the NRC regulatory limit.
Because of calculations such as the above and associ­ated radiation protection survey results, it is well recog­nized that Y-90 Zevalin therapy can be safely done on an outpatient basis using only standard universal precau­tions. The typically administered dose of Y-90 Zevalin is between 777 and 1110 MBq (21 to 30 mCi), with a maximum of 1184 MBq (1.184 GBq or 32 mCi).

Imaging for RIT Proper Treatment Delivery

The therapy aspect of RIT is usually coupled with a Nuclear Medicine imaging component to ascertain the actual targeting efficacy of the monoclonal antibody employed. Nuclear Medicine scanners cannot image the actual radioactive distribution of an agent from beta or alpha emissions because those radiations are absorbed locally to such a high degree that there is a negligible external signal for a Nuclear Medicine camera* to de­tect. Instead, a pretreatment dose of pharmaceutical in which the MABs are tagged with technetium Tc (which emits easily detectable 140 keV gammas) is ad­ministered and thereby generates, an image of the bio­logical distribution of that pharmaceutical. Based upon the biodistribution seen in the technetium image, the amount of radionuclide (such as the beta emitter Y90) to be injected into the patient is selected so as to deliver a
*Nuclear Medicine camera, also called a scintillation camera, it is an energy-selective device used mainly to image gamma ra­diation emitting radioisotopes. It precisely records the distri­bution of radiation emitted from a chemical compound con­taining a radionuclide that is attracted to specific organs or tissues and thereby can be used to quantitatively ascertain the amount of radionuclide taken up by various scanned regions of interest.
99m
336
CHAPTER 16 Radioisotopes and Radiation Protection
tumoricidal dose that will not cause unacceptable harm to healthy tissues (Fig. 16.6).

Summary of RIT

RIT, although not a general treatment modality, has, for its specific effective applications, unique advantageous properties:
• It takes about 1 week to deliver regions of interest (ROIs), shown in red in Fig. 16.6, as compared to many months for chemotherapy.
• It is the only non-chemotherapy-based approach with a good rate of durable remissions.
• It is an important choice for patients:
• who must continue to work through or shortly
after treatment
• who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, because of
advanced age, or specific coexisting other ailments.
• who may be insistent on limiting the on-
treatment side effects specific to chemotherapy
LUNG
LUNG
LIVER
Fig. 16.6 Injected 99mTc-serum albumin labeled antibody distri-
bution activity in liver and lung in a patient with liver carcinoma. ROIs (regions of interest) outlined in red around lungs and liver demonstrate respective number of organ counts, which, for a calibrated imaging technique can be translated into a quantita­tive estimate of the likely distribution of an alpha particle emit­ting radiopharmaceutical to be administered later for therapeutic purposes. Serum albumin is the main protein component of human blood plasma. (From Jadvar H: Targeted Radionuclide therapy: an evolution toward precision cancer treatment, AmJ Roentgenol, 209:277–288, 2017, ©SNMMI. This research was originally published in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine.)
544363 cts.
LIVER
1937144 cts.
such as nausea, neuropathy, hair loss, and gastric and mucositis complications.
A significant disadvantage, however, is the very high cost, in excess of $30,000, of receiving a RIT treatment. In addition, as was mentioned before, it is not currently available for a variety of solid tumors (e.g., rectal cancer).

RADIATION EMERGENCIES: USE OF RADIATION AS A TERRORIST WEAPON

After the attack on the World Trade Center by hijacked airplanes on September 11, 2001, the possibility of the use of other terrorist weapons, such as radiation, became a public health concern. Today, most hospitals have elaborate crisis plans for handling emergency situations involving radioactive contamination. Radiologic tech­nologists should become aware of the radiation emer­gency plans that exist in the facilities in which they work. In this section, some fundamental principles of dealing with radioactive contamination in a health care environ­ment are discussed.

Contamination

A radioactive dispersal device, or “dirty bomb,” is a radioactive source mixed with conventional explosives. It is intended to contaminate an area with radioactive material and thereby cause panic. The actual long-term health effects of a dirty bomb are likely to be minimal. If the radioactive material remains in a small area, few people may be affected. However, if enough explosives are used to spread the radioactive material over a broad area, then the radioactivity will be diluted and may not be much higher than background levels.
For example, it would be difficult for terrorists to accumulate as much radioactive material as existed in the Chernobyl nuclear reactor. Even if they were able to do this and were to explode the device with the same force as the explosion at Chernobyl, the actual number of radiation injuries would probably be quite small. At Chernobyl, no cases of acute radiation syn­drome (ARS) were caused by exposure outside the immediate vicinity of the reactor. The only cases oc­curred in emergency workers, primarily firemen, who worked very near the reactor. They had little training and essentially no protective gear to prepare them for a radioactive emergency. In the United States at the present time, emergency responders are equipped to monitor and assess personnel exposure on-site.