Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5196_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
62 Мб
Скачать
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
277
A
Fig. 14.1 (A) Mammography of the breast using the craniocaudal projection. (B) Mammography can be used
to detect breast cancer.
and is likely to result in many false-positive readings, leading to unnecessary biopsies in that population. The increased density of the breast of younger women tends to reduce radiographic contrast in the completed image. Digital mammography units which can enhance con­trast with image gray-level manipulation, offer substan­tial improvement for patients with dense breasts. Such units combined with a newer irradiation technique known as digital tomosynthesis (discussed later in this chapter) will lower the percentage of false-positive read­ings caused by very dense breasts and consequently, permit a more effective screening of younger women. Earlier detection will save lives in general.

Mammography Screening

The authors of this textbook support the recommenda­tions of the American College of Radiology, the American Cancer Society, and the American Medical Association. These groups advocate annual mammography screening or mammography screening at least every other year for women age 40 to 49 years. Before the onset of menopause, a baseline mammogram is also highly recommended for comparison with mammograms taken at a later age. The interested reader should contact these organizations for their latest policy statements on this subject.

Dose Reduction in Mammography

Dose reduction in mammography can be achieved by limiting the number of projections taken or by lowering the dose associated with each projection. In standard
B
mammography, axillary projections should be done only on request of the radiologist. If standard mam­mography is performed as a routine screening proce­dure, it is prudent to perform only craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections of each breast with adequate compression to demonstrate breast tissue uni­formly from the nipple to the most posterior portion.

Filtration for Mammographic Equipment

Appropriate attenuation is necessary for mammo­graphic equipment, which by design produces photons with an energy range of 17 to 23 keV. Metallic elements such as molybdenum (42Mo96) and rhodium (45Rh have most commonly been employed as filters for these low-energy x-ray beams. When the x-ray tube target is made of molybdenum, either a 0.03-mm molybdenum
filter or a 0.025-mm rhodium filter may be selected.7
For rhodium x-ray tube targets, only rhodium filters are used. These filtration and target materials facilitate a satisfactory level of contrast in the obtained radio­graphic image over the clinical extent of compressed breast thickness. This is accomplished by employing specific filters that preferentially select or permit pas­sage of a particular range or window of energies from the emerging x-ray spectrum that is very favorable for the photoelectric interaction. Molybdenum filters allow a lower energy window (17 to 20 keV) than rhodium filters (20 to 23 keV) (Fig. 14.2). Molybdenum filters are therefore suitable for small and average breast thickness, whereas rhodium filters used with a molybdenum or
103
)
278
Number of photons
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
Tungsten target/
aluminum filter
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
17–20 17–20 20–23
A B C
Fig. 14.2 (A and B) X-ray emission spectra for tungsten and molybdenum anodes. Note that tungsten pro-
duces a high volume of x-ray photons above the 17 to 20 keV range considered ideal for mammography. These photons merely degrade the quality of the recorded image. The molybdenum anode, however, produces few x-ray photons above the ideal energy range, thereby initiating a higher contrast on the finished image. (C) A rhodium anode produces a higher average energy x-ray beam than does the molybdenum anode. The energy range for rhodium-produced photons is 20 to 23 keV. Photons from this energy range can provide better penetration of larger, denser breasts. (From Ballinger PW, Frank ED: Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positions and radiologic procedures, ed 9, St. Louis, 1999, Mosby.)
Molybdenum target/
molybdenum filter
Energy (keV)
Rhodium target/
rhodium filter
rhodium anode are better for larger (i.e., compression thickness of 6 cm and greater) or dense breasts because they will produce an x-ray beam with more penetrating energy. Systemic use of such materials has the effect of reducing the mean glandular dose (MGD)* in firm breast tissue.
Maintaining and enhancing subject contrast are of paramount importance in mammography. Beryllium (4Be9) takes the place of the glass in the window of the low-kVp x-ray producing mammographic x-ray tube to accommodate this need.7 This light, strong alkaline earth metal permits the relatively soft characteristic ra­diation important for enhancing contrast to exit the tube without undergoing any significant attenuation.
Recently, it has been shown that newer, full-field digi-
tal mammography systems and digital tomosynthesis
systems provide better images with tungsten targets
*MGD is a convenient parameter that can be used to charac­terize the average absorbed dose to the breast as a result of a mammographic x-ray exposure. It will be discussed in detail later in this chapter.
184
(74W
) with rhodium filtration (W/Rh) for most breast
thicknesses and tungsten targets with silver (47Ag
108
) fil­tration (W/Ag) for thicker breasts. Digital detectors are better able to separate out image features in mammogra­phy when presented with the broader spectra provided by the tungsten targets.
Molybdenum x-ray tube targets with molybdenum or rhodium filtration are being replaced in newer digital sys­tems by tungsten targets with rhodium or silver filtration.
8,9

DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS/3D MAMMOGRAPHY

Tomography

The method used for generating an in-focus two­dimensional (2D) image of a slice or cross-section through a three-dimensional (3D) object is called To- mography. Traditional x-ray tomography achieves this result by simply moving an x-ray source in a preselected arc in one direction (i.e., clockwise or counterclockwise) as a mechanically linked x-ray detector traverses in a
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
279
constant plane in the opposite direction (right to left or left to right) during the exposure. This facilitates a sharpening of structures in the focal plane while causing structures in other planes above or below to appear blurred. Typically, selected arc angles have ranged from 15 degrees up to 45 degrees. In the past this technique was used to acquire more detail of specific structures within the patient, such as solid tumors. This practice has been almost totally superseded by the development of computed tomography.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)

10
In standard digital mammography, the 3D breast struc­ture is projected onto a detector plane perpendicular to the x-ray source, and the multiple tissues and structures of the compressed breast appear overlapped in the acquired projection image. This has two detrimental effects on a radiologist’s ability to detect subtle lesions from these usual mammography images: first, malignant lesions or tumors may be obscured by the presence of overlapping normal glandular tissue, producing false negatives; second, the superimposition of normal tissues might combine into a structure that appears to be an abnormality thereby signaling a false positive. This lowering of sensitivity and specificity in conventional mammography caused by tis­sue superimposition is often called “anatomical” or “struc­ture” noise. DBT has the ability to overcome anatomical noise by adding depth resolution to a mammogram. This technique was first approved by the US FDA in 2011.
Digital breast tomosynthesis is an imaging technique which generates multiple planar images or views of the breast from a series of low-dose x-ray projection images acquired by a full field digital detector * while the x-ray tube rotates within a limited arc about the patient’s breast.
*Full field digital detector historically refers to: When digital imaging was introduced as an alternative to analog film-screen radiography, technology enabled only small field of views in breast imaging. This new technology was used primarily to ob­tain small “spot views” during stereotactic biopsies and wire loca­tions, thus bypassing the time-consuming process of developing film-screen images and greatly expediting these procedures. Larger digital detectors were subsequently developed that permit­ted imaging an entire small breast, but multiple images were re­quired for larger breasts, requiring added radiation and time. The latter limitation was partially overcome by mammographic equipment using fan-beam technology. Eventually, larger digital detectors became available, thus enabling full-field imaging.
13
X-ray tube
Movement
Compression paddle
Center of
Breast
No grid
Fig. 14.3 DBT imaging configuration. The vertical direction is
along the z-axis and the plane of the detector (also known as in-plane) corresponds to the x and y axis direction. (From Vaughan CL: Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: recent advances and future prospects, Medical Engi- neering & Physics 72:27–37, 2019.)
rotation
Flat panel detector
This is physically achieved by modifying a standard digital mammography platform so that the gantry con­taining the x-ray tube assembly is able to rotate about an axis located above the breast support within the breast, while the compressed patient’s breast and the mam­mography detector remain stationary. Breast position­ing in DBT is the same as is used for conventional digital mammography, with the breast compressed, but often to a lesser degree, on a stationary support situated di­rectly above the detector assembly to permit different oblique views.
11,12
Fig. 14.3 is a schematic of a standard mammographic imaging setup as used for DBT with the x-ray tube at several angular orientations.
Digital breast tomography is often referred to as “3D” mammography because mammographic images can be reconstructed at arbitrary angles from the many different x-ray projections. The DBT image creation technique uses the same algorithms* as those for com­puted tomography (CT). The images are not of the same quality, however, as CT images, since those are acquired from a full 360-degree x-ray projection, but the technology and algorithms are improving. In typical
*Algorithm refers to a finite sequence of computer-imple­mentable instructions used by a computer to solve a class of problems or to perform a computation.
280
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
+20° –20°
Tube motion
Compression paddle
Compression paddle
Digital detector
Fig. 14.4 Multiple gantry angle effects and
depth resolution. (From Ikeda DM, Miyake KK: Breast imaging: the requisites, ed 3, St. Louis, 2017, Elsevier.)
Digital Breast Tomography, the third axis (z-direction) is stereoscopically extracted from the overall two­dimensional data. At different x-ray tube angles, objects at different heights in the breast are projected at differ­ent locations onto the detector with their detector sepa­ration increasing as the x-ray tube gantry angle in­creases (Fig. 14.4). The subsequent image reconstruction process leads to a stack of synthesized non-blurred slice images (similar in general appearance to 2D mammog­raphy planar images) of different depth layers in the breast parallel to the detector surface. The degree of overall resolution is predominantly determined by the detector’s characteristics, the reconstruction algorithm used, and the total angle of rotation of the x-ray tube. The in-plane (x-y) sharpness, or resolution, of the im­age is much higher than the resolution in the z-axis or the direction between adjacent slices (called depth reso­lution) due to the incomplete sampling of the object
Images seen on digital detector
–20°+20°
from a relatively small angular scan range. As of 2016, the best z-axis spatial resolution* obtained has been
2.3 mm using a 50-degree arc.
11

Effects of Tomographic Angular Scan Range

On the Depth Resolution of Structures. A standard 2D
full field digital mammogram (FFDM) gives no specific
information of the depth in the breast (z-axis location) of a particular mass or abnormal structure, implying that it could be at any depth. But as can be observed from
Fig.14.4 with a sufficient gantry angular displacement,
the lesion can be clearly distinguished on a detector from
*Spatial resolution refers to the ability to distinguish spatially close objects as distinct separate objects and is given by a lim­iting number (e.g., in millimeters or in line pairs resolved per millimeter) that quantifies that limit.
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
281
adjacent structures. A small tomosynthesis arc yields only a poor separation of vertically close objects (i.e., slight z­axis separation) while a large angle tomosynthesis arc provides a good visual separation of these objects and therefore a more precise vertical localization of the lesion or mass.
12
On In-Plane Image Quality. If an x-ray source moves
through a larger angular range, the obtained in-plane (x-y) image quality increases, at least initially. A larger angular range allows for extra view directions, which can improve the quality of the reconstructed image since the inside of the breast can be inspected more thoroughly. This is of importance since for many types of breast masses there is not much variation or differen­tiation from one laterally adjacent position to the next. Thus, image contrast is improved. However, if the total allowable breast dose is fixed while the number of views is increased, there is a deterioration in the overall image quality in each view because of increased image noise due to a lessening of the x-ray exposure per view (i.e., too low a signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]). The best perfor- mance for all tomosynthesis angles occurred when from one x-ray projection to the next, the angular increment was about 2.75 degrees.
14,15
Effects Summary. The following quantities depend on
acquisition geometry, scan parameters, and system hardware components12:
• Resolution.
• Detector Noise.
• Artifact level.
• Patient Dose.
• Accessible image volume.
• Examination time. Optimal image acquisition geometry therefore
should be a compromise that accounts for the effects of total tomosynthesis angle, angular increment, and the number and distribution of projections on14:
• correctly identifying architectural distortions and soft tissue lesions
• the perception of calcifications
• increased motion blur with increased scan time.

Image Reconstruction (IR)

Each DBT arc acquisition sequence may typically consist of from 15 to 25 separate x-ray projections. From the data generated by these, many well-defined planar views (their number depends on the compressed breast thickness)
can be obtained after computer processing. These synthe­sized slices can subsequently be viewed either individually or in a continuous sequence thereby generating a “movie”. This latter option, called cine mode, offers a clinician an approximate three-dimensional scan of the breast which can yield an improved examination of suspicious archi­tecture. Because only a limited arc angle inspection is available (e.g. from 15 up to 50 degrees depending on the mammographic unit), depth resolution through the breast of various objects or structures will also be depen­dent upon the depth range (z-axis extent) spanned by them. Thus, for structures such as microcalcifications that typically only persist across a few tomosynthesis planes, the image fidelity will be high.
Due to the breast’s highly inhomogeneous volume, typical required viewing voxel* dimensions in tomosyn­thesis are 100 mm 3 100 mm pixels in-plane (x-y plane) by 1 mm in depth (z direction) to adequately resolve variations of interest in the breast. As a result of this resolution, the 3D distribution of attenuation that is entirely projected into just one image in conventional mammography can in DBT be separated into many 1 mm thick layers, thereby increasing the visualization of features that are often obscured by overlapping struc­tures in a 2D single projection view.
As the x-ray projections are obtained, the raw image digital data is exported into the data processing com­puter’s reconstruction algorithm. The conventional method of image reconstruction used in digital tomo­synthesis is the Shift and Add Algorithm (SAA)14. As shown in Fig. 14.4, objects within the image sample that are at different heights above the detector will be pro­jected to different positions on the detector as the x-ray tube moves. It then becomes possible for the computer by properly registering** these images to both shift and add them so that similarly catalogued structures in a particu­lar plane are all lined up and are thus reinforced and those non-similarly registered structures are distributed over the image (misaligned) and are thereby blurred. As a
*Voxel is a term used for a discrete image volume element (a 3D measure), and pixel is a term used for a discrete image area element. **
Registration of imaged structures is the procedure of pre­cisely aligning two or more images of the same object. One image of the object always is classified as the reference image. Then, geometric transformations or local displacements (i.e., a shifting) are applied to all of the other images similar to the reference image so that they align with the reference image.
14
282
Graphic World Illustration Studio St. Louis, MO 314-567-9854
Elsevier Author
Author's review
(if needed)
Initials
Date
OK
Correx
ISBN #
Fig. #
Artist/PR
B x W
Document name
Date
Check if revision
Statkiewicz Sherer 978-0-323-82503-0
14-05b f14-05b-9780323825030.eps
eh
10/28/20
X
X
CE's review
Initials
Date
OK
Correx
4/C 2/C PMS XXX
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
result, for each reconstructed or synthesized plane, there is in sharp relief only the structures belonging to that plane, while other structures located in adjacent planes are out of focus in the plane of interest. Fig. 14.5 gives a pictorial summation of the acquisition and reconstruc­tion processes. This combined method of acquisition and reconstruction significantly reduces anatomical noise pro- moting easier and more reliable lesion detection. All of
1. Acquisition
A
2. Projections 3. Tomographic sections
the projection images are included in every synthesized planar image and all of these “planes”, each parallel to the detector surface, are generated through the entire breast from just a small number of x-ray projection images. Typically, the generated view planes are spaced 1.0 mm center to center apart. A 4.5-cm thick compressed breast reconstructed at 1 mm spacing will therefore, yield a group of 45 images.
1 mm slices
5mm slab
Calcification cluster Isolated microcalcifications
B
Fig. 14.5 (A) Shift and add method for tomographic image reconstruction. (B) By combining several thin
slices together like a pancake, the existence of a calcification cluster whose components were spread out over several adjacent 1 mm reconstructed slices is now apparent. Consequently, the production of a slab composed from adjacent thin slices has led to a diagnostic result indicative of the potential presence of a nearby cancer. (A, From Blum A, Noel A, Regent D: Tomosynthesis in musculoskeletal pathology. Diagn Interven Imaging 99(7–8): 423–441, 2018.)
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
283
In the acquisition process shown in Fig. 14.5A, an
x-ray tube moves to five discrete positions.
Objects situated at two different levels are projected onto the detector at different locations due to parallax. The five projection images are shifted and added to­gether to cause either of the objects in one of the two levels to be in sharp focus, depending on the magnitude of the shift for that object. Other types of images which can be reconstructed from tomosynthesis are slabs, i.e., broader slices obtained by merging together a multiple number of adjacent tomographic reconstructed planes (see Fig. 14.5B). Slabs, therefore, have a substantial thickness, typically 1 cm or more, and are particularly useful for detecting microcalcification bunches. In fact, microcalcifications usually seen grouped in clusters in standard 2D mammography may not be as well visual­ized along the z-axis direction (depth) in the thin tomo­graphic reconstructions and so not be obvious as mak­ing up a cluster. Furthermore, if some type of potentially pathological feature is detected in cine mode, then im­age slabs, because of their much fewer number, allow a quick spot review of the entire breast volume, prior to getting into the fine details of reviewing the numerous 1-mm synthesized tomographic planes.
11

Advantages of DBT

DBT mammographic examinations may be used to di­agnose breast cancer in people who have no overt signs or symptoms. Also, it can more sensitively investigate the cause of some breast problems such as localized or distributed pain and nipple discharge. When a DBT series is combined with 2D standard mammogram projections, the combination may be able to yield the following benefits.
Reduce the Need for Follow-Up Imaging. Should ab-
normalities be detected on standard mammogram im­ages, additional imaging will usually be recommended. This can be very stressful besides taking extra time and leading to additional costs. Performing a 3D mammo­gram along with a standard 2D mammogram at the same appointment, however, will reduce the need for follow-up imaging.
Detect More Cancers Than a Standard Mammogram Alone.
Multiple studies indicate that performing a 3D mammogram along with a standard mammogram can result in about one more breast cancer found for every
15
1000 women screened when compared with a standard mammogram alone. At the expense of some increased patient radiation dosage, this amounts to finding a sub­stantial number of otherwise undiscovered cancers when one considers the number of women annually screened.
Improve Breast Cancer Detection in Dense Breast Tissue.
A DBT mammogram offers advantages in de­tecting breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue. It has been noted that about 45% of all women receiving screening mammography are found to have either het- erogeneously dense or very dense breasts. Breasts are normally considered to be dense if there is present a much greater concentration of fibrous or glandular tis­sue than fatty tissue. With standard 2D mammograms, non-fatty breasts pose challenges to accurately identify­ing the presence of cancer since irregularities can often be efficiently concealed or masked within the dense tis­sue. With a DBT mammogram, however, breast tissue can be scrutinized slab by slab or even thin layer by thin layer, overcoming the obscurity effect and making it easier to detect cancer in an early stage. It should be noted that data collected on many patients has shown that the degree of breast density is not a major indicator for risk of breast cancer.
15
In Fig. 14.6B are shown planar images that might be reconstructed from an obtained DBT data set as displayed in Fig. 14.6A. The image planes depicted in
Fig. 14.6A, B are at different distances above the breast
support plate. As contrasted with the compacted 2D image shown in Fig. 14.6C, each of these tomographic planes clearly demonstrates a separate structure, whereas the 2D projection in Fig. 14.6C only exhibits a composite compacted image.
This ability to select multiple specific individual tis­sue planes in which various structures of interest are visually enhanced can significantly increase both the detection rate and the level of diagnostic confidence with respect to apparent abnormalities.12 To summarize, DBT images may be reconstructed as thin planes or as slabs depending on the desired fineness of z-axis resolu­tion. Another significant advantage of DBT is shown in
Fig. 14.7.
*Microcalcifications are small calcium deposits in breast tissue that on a mammogram look like white specks.
284
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
2D Projection
A B C
Fig. 14.6 DBT acquired breast slice views at three different depths. (From Abrahams RB, Huda W, Sensakovic WF:
Imaging physics: case review series, St. Louis, 2020, Elsevier.)
A B C
Fig. 14.7 Comparison of positive conventional mammogram and DBT images. The DBT slices in (A) and (B)
readily demonstrate the presence of 2 distinct abnormalities, while the standard digital mammogram pictured in (C) offers a poorer or less clear indication. (From Chan HP, Helvie MA, Hadjiiski L, et al: Characterization of breast masses in digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammograms: an observer performance study. AcadRadiol 24(11): 1372–1379, 2017.)
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
A
Fig. 14.8 Incompleteness in DBT imaging
scan. The area marked (a) attenuates the beam when the tube is in position (A) and is projected to area (a9) on the detector. The at-
Part of the breast
a
a’
which is reconstructed
tenuation caused by this area is only added to the most peripheral part of the breast tissue included by the detector. As seen, not all of the breast is captured by the detector. (From Rangarajan K, Hari S: Artefacts in digital breast tomosynthesis, ECR 2013 Poster C-1711,
2013. © European Society of Radiology.)
285

Artifacts in Digital Breast Tomography

16,17
Artifacts Due to Motion. The x-ray tube can move in
either a continuous or a step-and-shoot motion.* With continuous motion, x-ray exposures must be short enough to avoid image blurring due to focal spot motion. If step-and-shoot motion is employed, the gantry must come to a complete stop at each angular location before delivering x-rays, otherwise vibrations will blur the im­age. It is also important that the total scan time be not too prolonged, so as to reduce the possibility of patient mo­tion that can degrade the visibility of microcalcifications and small spiculations (lumps of tissue with spikes or points on the surface). A grid is generally not used during tomographic acquisitions since the varying irradiation angles essentially do the work of a grid.
Artifacts Due to Method of Acquisition. Acquisition
artifacts are primarily truncation artifacts that arise due to the limited physical size of the detector and the greater extent of oblique x-ray beams causing incom­plete coverage of the breast in multiple views (Fig. 14.8).
Some major examples of these are:
a) Bright area artifact – Appearing at extreme ends of
the image where the detector cannot see.
b) Staircase artifact – Presence of multiple lines at one
of the ends of the image creating a staircase-like ap­pearance or artifact where the beam cannot see. At
*In step-and-shoot mode, the x-ray tube moves to a predeter­mined position (angle), makes an exposure, and then pro­ceeds to the next position and so forth.
each tube position there is a corresponding part of
the breast tissue that would not be projected back by
the detector. The breast seemingly ends at different
places for different tube positions leading to the pro-
duction of lines at the edges of the image. This is
schematically shown in Fig. 14.8.
Artifacts Due to Z-Axis Resolution Deficiency. For
digital breast tomosynthesis, the attainable in-plane (x-y) resolution for a particular cross-section or breast
slice is very good but the limited angle of rotation of the x-ray tube (up to about a maximum of 60 degrees) and the limited number of x-ray projections restricts the z-axis resolution. This produces an incomplete cancellation of objects outside of the plane of interest and is the source of most artifacts.16 Consequently, the precise localization of an extended depth object will be less than perfect and some elongation of the suspi­cious object may also be present.
Fig. 14.9 depicts this situation.
Artifacts Due to Reconstruction Process.
16
a) Ripple – This arises from a poorly but still visualized
structure of high density (e.g., a calcification) being
observed in different slices from those in which it is
actually located. b) Halo artifact – Manifestation of a very-low-intensity
signal (dark) appearing to circle around high-
intensity objects such as calcifications (white) leads
to the creation of a halo or crown. Halos are par-
ticularly pronounced along the sweep direction of
the x-ray tube.
286
CHAPTER 14 X-Ray Breast Imaging: Methods and Radiation Safety Aspects
Breast
abnormality
or mass
Fig. 14.9 Location uncertainty of a mass due to DBT limitations. (From Rangarajan K, Hari S: Artefacts in
digital breast tomosynthesis, ECR 2013 Poster C-1711, 2013. © European Society of Radiology.)

Properties of DBT Summarized

18,19
Expanding the Angular Sweep of the X-Ray Tube.
• Improves z-axis or depth resolution and the blurring of out of plane objects.
• Permits finer or thinner reconstruction slices.
• At larger angles can begin to degrade in-plane or x-y sharpness but allows better out-of-plane resolution for larger objects such as masses that occupy multiple planes.
Increasing the Number of Projections for a Given Angular Range.
• Lowers the visibility of artifacts.
• Increases the patient’s absorbed dose if the same exposure settings (i.e., technique factors) are used.
• Increases the relative importance of detector noise if, however, the total dose is held constant.
Number of Projections Required Depends On:
• The angular extent of x-ray tube rotation.
• The number of image pixels or individual pixel size.
• The characteristics of the full field detector.
• The degree of differences in contrast of absorbing objects within the breast.

DBT Imaging Unit Characteristics

18
Shown below in Fig. 14.10 are preparatory and operational pictures of a typical 3D mammography system. Table 14.1 is an inventory of the physical characteristics and operati­onal parameters of several available commercial DBT units.
Potential depth uncertainty from DBT reconstruction
typically the axis of rotation will be positioned in the center of the compressed breast. The scan itself takes less than two to three seconds per x-ray projection and there can be as many as 25 views taken. The entire procedure from the patient entering the examination room up to leaving it will usually take about 20 minutes. Box 14.1 lists the various steps during the radiation exposures process for a typical commercial DBT unit.
18
With DBT alone, a compression force only great enough to securely retain the breast in a stable position during the procedure may suffice. For this situation, it is more feasible to use a flexible compression paddle, which will be less uncomfortable for the patient. In fact, it is possible that some DBT examinations could be per­formed using only half of the compression force em­ployed currently in standard 2D digital mammography, leading to a substantial reduction in perceived and/or actual patient pain while incurring no clinically signifi­cant change in breast imaging fidelity and tissue cover-
19,20
age.
The effects of decreased compression were ex­tensively examined in a study done with phantom images generated by using computer modeling methods that simulated three dissimilar breasts, each having two dif­ferent compressed thicknesses (4 cm and 6 cm) as com­pared with a lesser compressed pair (4.5 and 6.75 cm compressions). Using lesion conspicuity* as the metric of choice for masses and calcifications, the authors found no significant observational difference with the lesser compressions when the exposure parameters were varied to maintain a constant dose to the breasts.
19–21

DBT Procedure: Steps and Details

For a DBT examination, the patient’s breast is positioned the same way as it is in a conventional mammogram procedure. The radiologist may specify what the focal distance or location of the axis of rotation will be but
*The concept of lesion conspicuity is used to objectively quan- tify radiographic observational error. It is defined as a ratio be­tween lesion contrast and the surroundings. Experiments have been done to determine whether this ratio or measure can be well correlated with the probability of detecting faint lesions.
22