Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
102 Мб
Скачать
252
a
b
c
d
e
a
b
c
d
e
of dissection in the distal segment even if that segment has no plaque, and this risk is increased by more rapid balloon ination.
In contrast, what will happen if a 2.75-mm balloon is selected with the intention of inating it at a high pressure (18 atm) to a diameter of 3.05 mm? Although an indenta­tion may remain after ination at the nominal pressure (Fig.5.16d), gradually escalating the pressure to 22atm may remove the indentation and achieve a nal balloon diameter of about 3.05mm (Fig. 5.16e). This approach considerably reduces the risk of dissection in the distal segment.
The stenosis may sometimes be harder than expected. The approach I explained above aims to achieve optimal stent expansion by upfront high-pressure ination of a slightly undersized balloon while ensuring the safety of high- pressure angioplasty by slowly escalating the ination pressure. This reduces the risk of dissection associated with unplanned high-pressure ination of a balloon to an oversized diameter.
5 Mitsudo’s Non-pushing PCI Techniques
Fig. 5.16 My method of high-pressure balloon angioplasty. In a ste-
notic vessel (a), ination of a balloon with a diameter matching the luminal diameter of an intact segment of the vessel at its nominal pres­sure results in insufcient preparation of the lesion (b). If this balloon is inated at a higher pressure to achieve sufcient lesion preparation (and optimal stent expansion), the nal balloon diameter will exceed the nor­mal luminal diameter, possibly leading to dissection (c). An undersized balloon can be inated at high pressure to a diameter matching the nor­mal luminal diameter. If ination to the nominal diameter results in insufcient lesion preparation (d), the undersized balloon can be inated to an even higher pressure without exceeding the normal lumi­nal diameter (e)
5.3.3 Mechanisms ofDissection andCountermeasures
Fig. 5.15 Causes of dissection. If a balloon with a diameter matching
the luminal diameter of an intact segment of a straight vessel is inated across a lesion (a), the intact vessel wall will only just come into contact with the balloon and will not be injured (b). In contrast, the intact part of the vessel can be injured if the balloon has a larger diameter than the luminal diameter of the intact segment (c). In a curved vessel, even a balloon with a diameter matching the luminal diameter of the intact segment will apply greater stress on the vessel wall at its edges and can cause injury to the larger curvature of a bend (d, e)
The previous subsection discussed the risk of dissection during angioplasty with a balloon when the distal marker is located in a segment distal to the lesion. However, dissec­tion can also occur by other mechanisms during PCI, which means that precautions and countermeasures for dissection due to various mechanisms should be devised.
1. If the coronary artery distal to a lesion is vulnerable or
contains plaque that is continuous from the stent landing zone, dissection is likely to occur at the distal edge of a stent/balloon. The risk of dissection is particularly high for the coronary segment distal to a CTO that has become vulnerable (due to lack of exposure to blood pressure) and also contains plaque.
2. It is well-known that balloon angioplasty can rupture ste-
notic plaque, causing controlled dissection, but local dis­section may sometimes propagate distally during balloon angioplasty. To prevent this, the balloon should be inated
a
b
a
b
5.3 Balloon Angioplasty (POBA)
253
slowly to minimize intima-media separation. Before per­forming POBA, you should identify hard lesions with a
5.3.4 Scoring andCutting Balloon Angioplasty
risk of propagating dissection and create longitudinal cracks in the lesion by rotablation or scoring balloon angioplasty. Dissection associated with longitudinal cracks is unlikely to propagate distally (Fig. 5.17a). In contrast, transverse dissection creates a blind end that is subject to stress from blood ow and thus is likely to propagate distally or even occlude the vessel (Fig.5.17b).
3. A very high rate of dissection was reported after angio­plasty with a previously available balloon. This balloon was found to have a very low slipperiness. In a vessel with irregular walls, parts of the balloon may have become adherent to the walls during ination, after which further ination of the balloon may have placed excessive stress on the vessel that led to dissection. Since all currently avail­able balloons have improved slipperiness, dissection is unlikely to occur by this mechanism. However, the risk of dissection is increased by inating the balloon too rapidly.
The balloons available for these procedures (Lacrosse NSE, ScoreFlex, and AngioSculpt) have distinct charac­teristics. Since creating longitudinal cracks permits the vessel wall to expand radially, I prefer to use scoring bal­loons that purely create longitudinal cracks. Specically, I almost always use the Lacrosse NSE balloon because of its good crossability and the effectiveness of the pattern of cracks it creates.
The Lacrosse NSE balloon creeps forward and it can be advanced little by little without pushing forcibly. Even if a Lacrosse NSE balloon is stopped at the entrance of a stenosis, pre-dilating the lesion will allow it to creep forward if the scoring elements at the tip can be wedged in the lesion. If the tapered tip of this balloon distal to the distal marker can be inated to the same shape as its proximal part, this indicates that the balloon will be able to creep forward again (Fig.5.18a). Thus, this balloon has to be inated until it is able to creep forward. If the balloon has been inated sufciently, it can usually be advanced little by little without pushing it forcibly. If the distal part is not inated to the same shape as the proximal part (Fig.5.18b), it is probable that the body of the balloon has not yet crossed the lesion.
If scoring angioplasty with a Lacrosse NSE balloon is not effective, cutting balloon angioplasty should be attempted. When cutting balloon angioplasty is performed, the cutting balloon must not be pushed forward either. Due to the risk of destroying the blade or bursting the balloon by injury due to the blade, performing rotablation or high-pressure balloon angioplasty should be considered prior to cutting balloon angioplasty.
Fig. 5.17 Longitudinal versus transverse dissection. Unlike a longitu-
dinal dissection (a), a transverse dissection (b) is subject to stress from blood ow that may enlarge the dissection or cause occlusion of the vessel
Fig. 5.18 Advancing a Lacrosse NSE balloon catheter. When the
tapered part of a Lacrosse NSE balloon (indicated by the arrows) is fully inated, the balloon can creep forward (a). Conversely, poor ina­tion of the tapered part indicates that it will be difcult for the balloon to cross the lesion (b)
254
ab
5 Mitsudo’s Non-pushing PCI Techniques
5.4 Use oftheRotablator
At my center, rotablation is primarily indicated for debulk­ing lesions with circumferential calcication or lesions that cannot be dilated sufciently by balloon angioplasty (resid­ual indentation of the balloon). Two rotablation guidewires are available, which are the RotaWire Extra-Support and RotaWire Floppy.
5.4.1 Tornus andRotaWire
Most of the lesions that need debulking with a Rotablator can only be crossed by the Tornus catheter. It is very difcult to pass a RotaWire Extra-Support through a Tornus catheter. Although this may sometimes be achieved in a straight ves­sel, it is usually impossible to advance a RotaWire Extra­Support through a Tornus catheter despite pushing and rotating it. However, a RotaWire Floppy can be advanced into a Tornus catheter by rotating it. To facilitate rotation and advancement, instead of attaching a clip to the guidewire (Fig.5.19a), I attach a torquer (Fig.5.19b). Attempts to forc­ibly push a RotaWire guidewire can easily result in kinking at the point of obstruction.
5.4.2 Debulking aLesion ataBend
If the lumen distal to a hard stenosis at a bend in a coro­nary artery is only slightly narrowed, the rotablation burr may become stuck immediately after crossing the lesion and be difcult to withdraw. This is likely to occur with the RotaWire Floppy, but is rare with the RotaWire Extra­Support. Therefore, the RotaWire Extra-Support should be used when debulking a severe stenosis located at a bend.
5.4.3 Reducing Guidewire Bias andBurr Bias
When a RotaWire, especially the RotaWire Extra-Support, passes through a bend in a vessel, the wire becomes biased toward the inner curvature of the bend (Fig. 5.20a). This inward guidewire bias may offset the outward bias of the burr. On the other hand, the burr shows bias toward the outer curvature that is opposite to the guidewire bias (Fig.5.20b). If the guidewire passes through two bends in a vessel, the effect of crossing the rst bend may bias the burr toward the inner curvature of the second bend.
The situation becomes complicated when the target vessel has two or more bends. As shown in Fig. 5.21a,
Fig. 5.19 Difculty in advancing the RotaWire without rotation. (a) A clip can easily be attached to the RotaWire, but is of limited usefulness for
rotating the wire. (b) A torquer can rotate the wire efciently and help to advance it
5.5 ELCA
255
the guidewire is biased toward the inner curvature of each bend. In contrast, the burr is biased toward the outer curva­ture of the rst bend as a reaction to the guidewire bias, but this bias of the burr amplies the guidewire bias at the sec­ond bend (Fig.5.21b). If the guiding catheter is oriented so that guidewire bias at the rst bend becomes equivalent to that at the second bend, the burr directs the guidewire bias toward the outer side, tending to eliminate the guidewire bias (Fig.5.21c).
Performing rotablation with a biased burr will eventu­ally result eccentric debulking of the lesion, and it will need to be entirely stented. It is sometimes difcult to deliver a stent to such a lesion, but it can be effective to use the child-in- mother technique to advance the stent part of the way.
a
b
Fig. 5.20 Using the RotaWire Extra-Support when debulking a lesion
at a bend. The guidewire is biased toward the inner curvature of the bend (a), while the burr passes along the outer curvature (b)
a
b
c
Fig. 5.21 Advancing the RotaWire across two bends. The burr is
biased toward the outer curvature of the rst bend, and this burr bias amplies the guidewire bias toward the inner curvature of the second bend (a, b). Changing the orientation of the guiding catheter can reduce guidewire bias at the second bend (c)
5.4.4 Advancing aBurr
You can advance a rotablation burr into a stenosis by (1) lightly pressing the burr into the entrance of the lesion for several sec­onds or (2) repeatedly approaching the entrance with a pecking motion of the burr. I prefer to use the former method because the burr seems to follow the operator’s intentions better, although there is no denite evidence to support this choice. You should advance the burr very slowly while running it at a constant rate of not less than 5000rpm. In this context, I may add that you should not vibrate a balloon like a pecking motion when deliv­ering it and must not vibrate a stent when delivering it.
5.5 ELCA
We assessed the benet of ELCA in 116 patients undergo­ing PCI at my center during the period from 2001 to 2008. Among these 116 patients, 101 patients had CTO and 98 of them underwent 0.9-mm ELCA. ELCA was indicated for debulking of CTOs that could be crossed by a guidewire, but not by a balloon catheter.
After the introduction of retrograde PCI in October 2005,
our use of ELCA declined dramatically and reached zero in
2008. A retrograde guidewire that has crossed a CTO can be introduced into the antegrade guiding catheter and trapped to create a guidewire loop, so that a retrograde microcatheter can almost always track the collateral channel and cross the CTO.If a retrograde microcatheter has crossed the CTO, an antegrade microcatheter or balloon catheter can also almost always cross the CTO.Thus, use of the 0.9-mm laser cath­eter for treating CTOs has been abandoned.
Since ELCA was recently approved for coverage by the national health insurance scheme in Japan, its benet for the treatment of thrombotic occlusion has been reappraised. The importance of non-pushing PCI techniques should always be kept in mind when treating thrombotic occlusions. Since a thrombotic occlusion is soft, it can be readily crossed by advancing a laser catheter. However, you should always bear in mind that rapidly advancing a laser catheter is not a good idea. There is a risk of inadvertently pushing the catheter for­ward too vigorously.
A single laser energy pulse of up to 80 J only ablates
0.05mm of tissue. At the maximum frequency of 80 pulses/ sec, a laser catheter can only be advanced at a speed of
4.0 mm/s. Advancing the laser catheter more rapidly than
4.0mm/s involves utilization of mechanical energy in addi­tion to laser energy.
It may be considered reasonable to push the ELCA cath­eter to help it cross the CTO, but pushing will considerably reduce the ability to ablate soft tissue.
256
5 Mitsudo’s Non-pushing PCI Techniques
5.6 Stenting
5.6.1 General Precautions forStenting
5.6.1.1 Lesion Preparation
The two objectives of preparing a lesion for stenting are (1) to facilitate smooth delivery of the stent to the target location without the need to apply force strong enough to deform the stent and (2) to dilate the lesion sufciently to ensure optimal stent expansion.
To facilitate smooth stent delivery, it is most important to dilate the lumen of the lesion to a sufcient diameter for delivering the stent. In addition, lesion preparation should eliminate luminal irregularities. In particular, irregularities that create indentations visible in the short axis view on the larger curvature of a bend in the target vessel can interfere with advancement of a stent (Fig. 5.22a). In contrast, an irregularity that can only be seen in the long axis view will not block advancement of a stent (Fig.5.22b).
How can a lesion be prepared sufciently for optimal stent expansion? A stent can exert a maximum resistance of 3kPa (3atm) to prevent recoil of the surrounding vessel walls, which means that any stent can be deformed when compressed by vascular recoil with a force greater than 3atm. It is well-known that a lesion should be pre-dilated until the balloon is fully inated to eliminate all indentations. Thus, lesion preparation with balloon angioplasty (nominal pressure: 3atm) is theoretically inadequate if any indenta­tion remains in the balloon, although this has not been tested for economic reasons. To ensure optimal stent expansion, the vessel wall at the lesion needs to be made redundant (to reduce recoil).
Effective methods of adequately preparing a lesion for smooth stent delivery and optimal stent expansion include (1) debulking with a Rotablator, (2) scoring balloon angio­plasty, (3) high-pressure balloon angioplasty, and (4) suf­cient POBA.
POBA alone can prepare a stenotic lesion with soft brous plaque or lipid-rich plaque, while high-pressure bal­loon angioplasty may be required for a calcied lesion or a
lesion with harder brous plaque. With a very hard lesion, scoring balloon angioplasty (e.g., Lacrosse NSE) can be performed to create cracks in the calcied or hard brous plaque, thereby reducing vascular recoil after balloon angio­plasty. A calcied lesion that is too hard for scoring balloon angioplasty or that resists delivery of the scoring balloon should be debulked with a Rotablator.
1. The debulking devices available include ELCA and the Rotablator. Debulking with a Rotablator is most effective for preparing a calcied lesion for stent implantation. Rotablation can enlarge the lumen and also reduces the vascular burden of calcication and thus decreases rigid­ity of the vessel wall.
2. A lesion that seems difcult to dilate sufciently by high­pressure balloon angioplasty even after debulking with a Rotablator should be scored with a Lacrosse NSE bal­loon. After performance of scoring balloon angioplasty, such a lesion will be easier to dilate by relatively low­pressure balloon angioplasty.
3. Adding high-pressure balloon angioplasty to scoring bal­loon angioplasty will fracture calcied plaque, thereby creating vessel wall redundancy and reducing recoil.
a
b
Fig. 5.22 Differences of luminal irregularities. Luminal irregularities
on the larger curvature that appear to be similar in the long axis view may have a different distribution in the short axis view. Irregularities on the larger curvature that can also be seen in the short axis view may interfere with stent delivery (a), whereas irregularities only seen in the long axis view will not (b)
a
b
5.6 Stenting
257
5.6.1.2 Diculty withStent Delivery: Predicting andAvoiding Problems
After apparently sufcient lesion preparation, it may still prove difcult to advance a stent during PCI.This is proba­bly due to residual luminal irregularities after balloon angio­plasty (Fig.5.23a).
Difculty delivering a naked stent can often be pre­dicted by difculty with delivering a balloon for lesion preparation. I use the child-in-mother technique (e.g., GuideLiner) if I encounter difculty in advancing a bal­loon or if it becomes blocked after high-pressure balloon angioplasty.
Fig. 5.23 Lesion at a bend with calcied plaque. (a) Sufcient dilata-
tion of a lesion with calcied plaque can enlarge the lumen, but may cause dissection or indentation at the edge of the plaque that inhibits stent advancement. (b) Additional high-pressure balloon angioplasty may further enlarge the dissection or indentation at the edge of the cal­cied plaque, which may preclude stent delivery
5.6.1.3 Stent Delivery Strategy Based onthePattern ofDiculty withDelivery
A stent that appears to be deliverable may become blocked and difcult to advance into the target lesion. If this happens, I choose the optimal stent delivering strategy according to the pattern of difculty with delivery. I never push the stent hard or push it in while wiggling it. If it suddenly becomes impossible to advance a stent immediately after feeling that it was deected, attempts to push the stent further are likely to deform it. It is safer and more reliable to advance the stent via a child catheter in order to bypass luminal irregularities.
If you notice that advancing a stent gradually becomes more difcult until it is completely impossible to move it further, you must not increase the force applied to the stent. In this situation, pushing hard on the stent will not help to advance it. Rather, some struts will be deformed at the edges or in the body of the stent, wherever friction is greater, even­tually making the stent undeliverable to the landing zone. Instead, you should continue to apply the same force to stent delivery catheter as that which advanced it before, which will result in slight deection of the shaft of the stent deliv­ery catheter (Fig.5.24a). If you then pull the catheter back slightly to eliminate the deection and apply the same force again, the stent will advance a little (Fig.5.24b).
This maneuver will achieve delivery of the stent into a short lesion, but may not prevent it from becoming stuck again in a long lesion. If the stent again stops advancing, it should be pulled back to eliminate deection of the shaft and then pushed in again to advance it slightly. Such alternating pull­back and advancement of the stent will eventually achieve delivery. This is the safest and most reliable method, although it is time-consuming. However, if it becomes completely impossible to advance the stent after repeating this maneuver two or three times, the best option is to slowly withdraw the stent and switch to stenting via the child-in- mother technique.
258
a
b
5 Mitsudo’s Non-pushing PCI Techniques
Fig. 5.24 When a stent is difcult to deliver. (a) To deliver a stent into
a difcult lesion (e.g., a lesion with calcied plaque), it should be push in with slight force to deect the shaft of the stent delivery catheter. (b) Then the catheter should be pulled back slightly to eliminate deection of its shaft and slowly advanced again. This maneuver may help to bypass the obstruction and allow advancement of the stent. If the stent becomes obstructed again, this maneuver should be repeated. If several repetitions cannot achieve stent advancement, the stent should be with­drawn and then advanced via a child catheter. However, the stent should never be pushed in forcibly
5.6.1.4 Other Strategies
In recent years, the abovementioned strategy has been widely used to deliver a stent into a difcult lesion. In addition, the strategies discussed in previous chapters (e.g., the buddy wire technique, buddy balloon technique, slip-through technique, and trapping technique) are also effective. These techniques are worth trying if another guidewire has crossed a distal bifurcation lesion or an additional guidewire is available. However, a forcible attempt to advance an additional guide­wire may fail or may cause deformation of a stent that has not been completely protected, so is questionable whether an additional guidewire should be inserted to facilitate stent delivery. The child-in-mother technique may be safer and more reliable for delivering a stent into a difcult lesion.
soon after performance of positioning CAG, the stent may advance further during expansion. After a stent has been advanced to the target, the stent delivery catheter should be pulled back slightly (so as to only straighten its shaft while not withdrawing the stent) before positioning CAG is per­formed. Whenever there is an interval between positioning CAG and stent deployment, positioning CAG (uoroscopy) should be repeated immediately before inating the SDB.
5.6.2 Using aConformable Stent
5.6.2.1 What Is aConformable Stent?
As is the case for bifurcation stenting, it is better to use a conformable stent for general coronary artery stenting. A conformable stent is preferred for the following four reasons: (1) less edge effect, (2) a low risk of fracture, (3) the ability to only apply bending stress to the vessel after fracture occurs at a link, and (4) less edge effect at the fractured stumps.
What makes a stent conformable? As shown in Fig.5.25, less stress is produced when conformable stent is bent, so that it can be longitudinally expanded on the larger curvature and compressed on the smaller curvature. Thus, “conformabil­ity” of a stent is a synonym for “longitudinal deformability.”
Particularly for bifurcation stenting, I prefer to use stents with fewer links (such as the Wiktor, GFX, S-6, S-7, Driver, S-stent, Nobori 3.5-mm, Element, and Integrity), as stated previously. I rarely use the Cordis and CrossFlex stents because the radio-opacity of the former is too high and the proximal part of the latter shows suboptimal expansion.
5.6.1.5 Stent Positioning
Before stably positioning a stent that has been delivered into a lesion, CAG should be performed to conrm that the distal edge of the stent has reached the target. If CAG takes too long, a stent that has reached the target will often move fur­ther before deployment and expansion. Even if it is expanded
Fig. 5.25 Design of a conformable stent
5.6 Stenting
259
5.6.2.2 Points toConsider
Based on the nding that stents with fewer links are more likely to undergo deformation, I have made efforts to develop techniques for successfully placing such stents without deforming them. I take great care to prevent deformation of stent struts by a balloon during its advancement into the SB of a bifurcation lesion or by the exit port of an IVUS cath­eter during withdrawal. I consider that the interventionalist is required to maintain the original shape of an implanted stent by using various techniques. However, stent deformation by other devices under the abovementioned circumstances is often localized and sometimes undetectable by CAG.Hence, stent deformity may often be overlooked during PCI.
The PROMUS Element is a two-link stent composed of eight short crowns, with struts linked by short oblique peak­to- valley interconnections and thus aligned in the identical phase. This conguration prevents overlap between adjacent struts and helps to achieve good conformability (longitudinal deformability) of the stent (Fig.5.26).
Since I began to use the PROMUS Element stent, I have failed to prevent deformation several times despite taking great care during delivery, while its high conformability has deeply impressed me. Since I considered it my mission or raison d’etre to safely place this highly conformable stent without deforming it, I reviewed six cases of stent deforma­tion among over 200 cases of coronary artery stenting to identify risk factors for stent deformation.
These six cases included the following: (1) a severely tapered lesion (Fig. 5.27), (2) a tapered lesion in a highly angulated vessel (Fig. 5.28), (3) an aorto-ostial lesion (Fig. 5.29), (4) a bifurcation lesion with a large-diameter proximal MB (Fig. 5.30), (5) a severely calcied lesion (Fig.5.31), and (6) a lesion recanalized by stenting a false lumen (Fig.5.32). In all of these lesions, a balloon for post­dilatation or SB dilatation had to be advanced into or across a stent with some struts that had not been apposed. The risk of stent deformation appears to be particularly high for lesions at a bend in the vessel or ostial lesions. Signicant irregular­ity of the stent lumen (e.g., after deployment in a severely calcied lesion) or the balloon surface creates severe friction during balloon advancement, which can be another risk fac­tor for stent deformation.
Such longitudinal deformation results in the struts being pushed together or pulled apart after stent deploy-
ment. Why is sufcient force to cause deformation applied to the stent? This primarily occurs because a stent strut or link has obstructed another device (Fig. 5.33). When additional force is applied to advance the device, the strut is very likely to undergo severe deformation. Accordingly, you should not attempt to push a device forward after hit­ting a stent strut and should take other measures that help to bypass the strut. In a tortuous vessel, in particular, even the tip of a balloon introduced to improve apposition of the proximal part of a stent is likely to hit a non-apposed strut (Fig.5.34). In this situation, even slight application of force can cause severe deformation of the stent. To avoid such deformation, it is important to place the stent so that its struts will not be hit by other devices during the subse­quent steps of PCI, such as delivery of the post-dilatation balloon.
I have encountered little stent deformation since I adopted several techniques (both old and new) to prevent collision of other devices with the struts and to eliminate these risk fac­tors for deformation.
Fig. 5.26 PROMUS Element stent. At a bend in the vessel, the
PROMUS Element stent applies less stress to the vessel wall as it can be longitudinally expanded on the outer curvature of the bend and com­pressed on the inner curvature
260
ab
cd
5 Mitsudo’s Non-pushing PCI Techniques
Fig. 5.27 Stenting an LAD lesion (a). Low-pressure ination of the
SDB to the target vessel diameter has not achieved optimal stent expan­sion at the point indicated by an arrow. When the stent delivery catheter was pulled back slightly, only the proximal marker moved and the distal marker did not, indicating that the stent has been shortened (b). Immediate
withdrawal of the stent delivery catheter would establish deformation (shortening) of the stent and preclude delivery of a post- dilatation bal­loon. On the other hand, readvancing the stent delivery catheter resolved shortening of the stent due to its high conformability (c). Then the SDB was inated slowly until all indentations were eliminated (d)
5.6 Stenting
Fig. 5.28 LCX bifurcation lesion. After bifurcation
stenting, an IVUS catheter was advanced into the stent and caused deformation of the stent edge on the larger curvature of the bend (arrow) due to proximal malapposition
261
1
2
Fig. 5.29 Stenting an RCA lesion in a patient with acute coronary syndrome. Due to severe tortuosity of the RCA, the tip of a post-dilatation
balloon contacted the stent as it was being advanced and caused shortening of the stent (arrow)