Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
102 Мб
Скачать
ab
1.6 Antegrade Approach
79
1.6.4.11 Correcting theGuidewire Route by Using aLandmark
If there is strong evidence that subintimal deviation of the guidewire has occurred, the next step is usually to reorient the wire toward the true lumen by using a landmark.
In the days when I used a 0.014-inch less slippery non­tapered guidewire, I could feel the resistance to its tip and use the magnitude of resistance to decide whether the wire was in the true lumen or had deviated into the subintimal space. Since the recent CTO crossing guidewires create less resistance, the interventionalist cannot rely on subjective judgment of resistance alone to make a reliable assessment. Currently, visual evidence is absolutely required to deter­mine whether a guidewire is in the true or false lumen.
However, when imaging shows the interventionalist that the tip of a guidewire is unable to advance further in a vessel, the tip may actually have been trapped within the occlusion. Trapping, which makes the guidewire difcult to withdraw, seems to occur when the tip of the wire has been advanced through the media parallel with the vessel wall for a certain distance (see
1.6.4.4 “Guidewire Trapping and Inection” [page 52]). If a guidewire has become trapped, you still have a good chance to correct the route of the wire and to ensure that it follows the true lumen. However, if the guidewire remains trapped for too long, it will become extremely difcult to withdraw. Therefore, you should suspect guidewire trapping and attempt to correct it at an early stage. You should promptly pull the guidewire back slightly if it becomes impossible to advance further and check that the tip can be pulled free and moved before attempting to correct the route of the wire by using a landmark.
Since conrmation of guidewire trapping is a basic proce­dure, I will discuss here how to use a landmark to correct the guidewire route after trapping has been conrmed. I would like to emphasize that the methods for correction described under [1] and [4] in “Parallel Wire Technique” (page 75) are also applicable to retrograde PCI.
First, I would like to review the basics of correcting the guidewire route. Under what circumstances and when should you correct the route of a guidewire that has deviated into the subintimal space? In general, if the tip of the guidewire is near the distal true lumen, but collateral imaging indicates that it will not enter the distal lumen, the wire is a candidate for correc­tion unless you can verify that it is coaxial with the target vessel and directed toward the distal lumen. If the guidewire has been advanced as far as the distal true lumen, but its tip is actually outside the lumen, it is also a candidate for correction. The tip of the guidewire may deviate from the true lumen in various ways. For example, it may deviate toward the larger curvature (Fig.1.117a) or toward the smaller curvature (Fig.1.117b) of the bend in a vessel in only one projection (Fig.1.118a) or in both of two projections (Fig.1.118b), or it may deviate in a non­coaxial manner (Fig.1.119). The mode of guidewire deviation from the true lumen inuences the method of correcting it.
To correct a deviating guidewire, it is recommended to search for an inection point in the wire as the site from
which to start correction and/or use two orthogonal projec­tions, one of which shows the guidewire outside the true lumen (Figs.1.108, 1.118a, and 1.120). In a long CTO with no natural internal landmarks, if the tip of the guidewire is outside the true lumen distal to the occlusion, the wire will not always have a denite inection point within the occlusion (Fig.1.121). You should suspect that the guidewire is wind­ing through the subintimal space. If the guidewire is found to show slight deviation in a certain direction in both projections, it is worth pursuing that direction (Fig.1.121). This is espe­cially true if there is an obstruction in that direction.
Using monoplane angiography, most guidewires that have deviated from the true lumen are visualized as remain­ing within the lumen in one projection and exhibit maxi­mum deviation from the lumen in another projection that is orthogonal to the rst.
Figure 1.122 shows a typical occlusion of the proximal LAD.When performing PCI for CTO of the proximal LAD, the interventionalist usually advances a guidewire under uoro­scopic guidance, primarily employing the AP+CR view. In this case, the guidewire is seen to follow the LAD in the AP+CR view, but deviates from the course of the target artery in the LL+CR view. If the guidewire enters the distal true lumen in one, but not in the other, of two orthogonal projections obtained with the detector surfaces parallel to the longitudinal axis of the occluded vessel, the latter projection is very useful for correct­ing the position of the guidewire. When performing the parallel wire technique, you should advance another guidewire along the rst guidewire using the projection in which the rst wire seems to remain in the true lumen and should attempt to nd the right direction to avoid deviation of the second guidewire in the other projection (Figs.1.123 & 1.124).
If the occlusion is not so long, the inection point of the rst guidewire can often be identied easily in the projec­tion which displays maximum deviation of the wire from the distal true lumen.
Fig. 1.117 Guidewire direction relative to the distal true lumen. (a)
Guidewire deviating from the distal true lumen toward the larger curva­ture of the vessel. (b) Guidewire deviating from the distal true lumen toward the smaller curvature of the vessel
80
ab
ab
Fig. 1.118 Guidewire direction relative to the distal true lumen. (a)
Guidewire deviating from the distal true lumen in only one of two orthogonal projections. (b) Guidewire deviating from the distal true lumen in both of two orthogonal projections
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
Fig. 1.120 Two orthogonal projections. Deviation of a guidewire
advancing along the vessel wall is difcult to identify. However, a guidewire that is viewed as following the center of the distal true lumen in one projection (b) is viewed as deviating from the true lumen in another projection orthogonal to the rst (a)
Fig. 1.119 Guidewire direction relative to the distal true lumen. The
guidewire is not directed toward the distal true lumen due to loss of coaxiality and deviates from the lumen in both of two orthogonal projections
RAO
Fig. 1.121 Guidewire deviating into the subintimal space in a long
occlusion. If the guidewire deviates into the subintimal space and fol­lows a winding course within a long occlusion, the inection point of the guidewire is difcult to identify, even using two orthogonal projections
LAO
1.6 Antegrade Approach
81
a
d
b c
e f
h
g
Fig. 1.122 Occlusion of the proximal LAD: the same procedure as
shown in Fig.1.106. (a) AP + CR view. (b) LL+ CR view. The rst guidewire was manipulated under uoroscopic guidance in the AP+CR view. In the LL+CR view, which is almost orthogonal to the AP+CR view, the coronary artery branches overlap considerably, and precise guidewire manipulation is impossible. Biplane angiography shows that the guidewire reaches the distal true lumen in the AP+CR view (c), but deviates considerably upward from the true lumen in the LL+CR view (d). In this view, an inection point (arrow) can be clearly recognized (e). Using the seesaw wiring technique, the second guidewire was
advanced along the rst guidewire to a site just proximal to the inection point. In the AP+CR view, the second guidewire advanced in parallel with the rst guidewire was seen to be crossing the occlusion through the true lumen (f). The second guidewire was advanced in the LL+CR view with its tip oriented downward around the inection point while apply­ing xed point rotation to explore the site of obstruction. After this manipulation, the guidewire was also seen to be crossing the occlusion through the true lumen in the latter projection (g). An enlarged image (h) clearly shows that the second guidewire has been advanced without undergoing inection like that observed in the rst guidewire
82
ab
a b c d e f g
Fig. 1.123 Finding the route for the second guidewire with the parallel
wire technique. (a & b) Two orthogonal views. If the anatomy of the occluded vessel is unclear, the second guidewire should be advanced along a route that initially diverges from the rst guidewire, but then goes parallel to it without increasing divergence between the two wires
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
Fig. 1.124 Correcting the direction of the second guidewire relative to
the landmark guidewire. The second guidewire is considered to have been successfully corrected if it eventually becomes parallel with the rst guidewire, even if it initially deviates considerably from the other wire (e). If the second guidewire is not parallel with the rst guidewire and is advanced in the wrong direction (a, b, c & d), it will not reach the true lumen distal to the occlusion. If the second guidewire initially devi­ates from the rst guidewire, but then takes a parallel course, it is worth advancing the second wire further in that direction of (e). If the two guidewires are parallel but very close to each other in both orthogonal projections, it may be doubtful that the second wire is in the true lumen (f). It is often seen that the second guidewire crosses the rst wire one or more times and then eventually goes toward the distal true lumen (g). This is probably the result of the rst guidewire winding through the subintimal space
ab cd
1.6 Antegrade Approach
83
Using Calcied Plaque as a Landmark
When advancing a guidewire toward the distal true lumen by using calcied plaque as a landmark, you may obtain a uoroscopic view of the calcied plaque like that shown in Fig.1.125a. When performing PCI under uoroscopic guid­ance, the guidewire is manipulated toward the distal true lumen that has been visualized by collateral imaging, and it eventually appears to have reached the lumen in this view. However, using calcied plaque as a landmark does not allow us to determine the accurate anatomy of the occluded vessel, which may be like that shown in Fig.1.125b or c. In Fig. 1.125c, the guidewire appropriately follows the curve of the vessel and appears to remain within the true lumen. However, Fig. 1.125d displays a guidewire following the course shown in Fig.1.125b within an occluded vessel hav­ing the same curvature as in Fig.1.125c. In this view, the guidewire appears to deviate into the subintimal space, at least at the midportion of the occlusion. Thus, a guidewire that apparently follows the course shown in Fig.1.125b, c, or d in one projection may have an unexpectedly different course in another projection orthogonal to the rst projection.
Using the Distal True Lumen Visualized by Contralateral Imaging as a Landmark
If the distal true lumen visualized by contralateral (collat­eral) imaging is the only landmark available, it can only be seen temporarily during imaging and is not a sufcient guide for accurate correction of the guidewire route with the single- wire technique. However, if the inection point of the guidewire can be clearly identied, you can withdraw the guidewire to a site just proximal to that point and then slowly advance it in the opposite direction to the direction of inec­tion. If the guidewire advances along the predicted route of the true lumen, you may continue in that direction and advance it further while performing xed point rotation. If favorable guidewire advancement continues, you may switch from xed point rotation to plane rotation.
You can try to correct the guidewire route several times using a single crossing guidewire, but if these attempts fail, it is better to switch your strategy to parallel wiring or retrograde PCI.If attempts at correction are repeated too often, the guide­wire may deviate into the same subintimal space repeatedly and create a large dissection. A Conquest Pro guidewire has a stiffer tip than a Gaia guidewire and readily causes dissection if it deviates into the subintimal space and is advanced through that space (see Fig.1.85). To prevent creation of a large dissec­tion, you should proceed to the next step at an early stage.
Fig. 1.125 Using calcied plaque as a landmark. In (a) CTO with
areas of calcication as shown in a, the anatomy of the occluded vessel may be as shown in (b) or (c). It can often be predictable from the movement of the vessel, but not until the start of guidewire manipula­tion. If (b) and (c) represent the predicted and actual anatomy of the vessel, respectively, a guidewire advanced through the CTO will inevi­tably deviate into the subintimal space (d)
Parallel Wire Technique
As mentioned above, the parallel wire technique involves using one guidewire as a landmark to advance another guide­wire. You should bear in mind that the rst guidewire is a secondary landmark compared to the distal true lumen visu­alized by collateral imaging, since the exact point where the rst guidewire deviates into the subintimal space is unknown. However, the following ve signs may indicate the point of guidewire deviation:
1. Inection point: If there is an inection point, investigate
whether inection of the second guidewire can be avoided
and the wire can be advanced in an appropriate direction
from that point (Fig.1.102).
2. “Blocking” point: If there is a point where “blockage”
occurs, press the tip of the second guidewire against the
obstruction, and apply xed point rotation to identify the
direction in which the guidewire can be advanced (see
Fig.1.89).
3. Divergence point: If the tip of the guidewire is outside the
true lumen, explore a new direction by the second guide-
wire from any point of slight divergence of the two wires,
even if they are parallel with each other (Fig. 1.123).
There are several patterns of divergence (Fig. 1.124). If
advancement of the guidewire is blocked, also perform
xed point rotation at that point and attempt to nd the
direction in which it can go forward.
84
ab
ab
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
4. Trapping point: The guidewire is usually trapped at the boundary between the true lumen (inside plaque) and the subintimal tissue, i.e., in a layer very close to the true lumen (see 1.9.1 “Guidewire Entrapment”). You should pull a trapped guidewire back by a distance of 1 to 2mm and then advance it again while exploring to nd a direc­tion in which it does not get trapped again.
5. Entry point: A guidewire may deviate into the subintimal space or go outside the vessel wall via a small side branch at the CTO entry. In this situation, try to penetrate the entry at a different point or explore a different route for advancement of the wire from the entrance (Fig.1.126). If the guidewire seems to have penetrated a hard proximal cap and then passed through the occlusion smoothly with­out obstruction to reach the exit, but fails to enter the dis­tal true lumen, it may have deviated into the subintimal space just near the entry. Subintimal deviation at the CTO entry should also be suspected if the guidewire returns to the distal subintimal space without being blocked while crossing the occlusion after it has been withdrawn from this space and advanced again in an attempt to nd the correct route.
Deviation of the guidewire outside the vessel wall just at
the CTO entry can easily be detected by a sudden marked reduction of resistance and unrestricted movement of the wire after it has passed through a hard obstruction.
Contralateral Guidewire Technique (See 1.7.13 “Kissing Wire Technique”)
If a guidewire has been advanced retrogradely into an occlu­sion, the guidewire will be in the true lumen at least at the exit of the CTO.Therefore, you should advance an antegrade guidewire toward the retrograde guidewire at the exit point, but it is unclear how far the retrograde wire remains in the true lumen. The antegrade guidewire should be advanced accord­ing to the abovementioned rules [1] through [5]. If it comes into contact with the retrograde guidewire (Fig.1.127), it can then reach the distal true lumen by being advanced to the exit point alongside the retrograde wire. It does not matter where the two guidewires come into contact with each other, whether in the subintimal space or inside a plaque. In both cases, the second (antegrade) guidewire should be able to follow the track created by the rst (retrograde) guidewire. To ensure this, you should use a Gaia Second or stiffer CTO guidewire.
Fig. 1.126 Correcting the guidewire direction from the CTO entry.
Two orthogonal projections (a & b). If the rst guidewire is suspected to have deviated into the subintimal space or outside the vessel wall, you should explore another route from the CTO entrance (another point of penetration) with the second guidewire
Fig. 1.127 Correcting the direction of an antegrade guidewire with a
retrograde guidewire as the landmark. Two orthogonal projections (a & b). Using a retrograde guidewire (whether in the true lumen or subinti-
mal space) that cannot be advanced further as a landmark (kissing wire technique), you should exchange the antegrade guidewire for another wire with a higher tip load and attempt further advancement through the occlusion to the distal true lumen. If the antegrade guidewire comes into contact with the retrograde guidewire at any point on its way to the exit, you should attempt the reverse CART technique
a
bc
1.6 Antegrade Approach
85
1.6.4.12 IVUS-Guided Wiring: Side Branch
Technique
A guidewire that is conrmed to be in the subintimal space at the exit of a CTO has often gone into the subintimal space at the entry of the occlusion. Many guidewires fail to track the true lumen at the CTO entry and are located in the sub­intimal space at the exit. If you are manipulating a stiff CTO guidewire toward the entry of an occlusion and there is a side branch that can accommodate an IVUS catheter near the entry, you should introduce an IVUS catheter into the side branch to check if the guidewire tracks the true lumen at the CTO entry.
When penetrating the proximal cap with the guidewire,
you should focus attention on the uoroscopic image rather than the IVUS image. The uoroscopy angle should be set so that the guidewire can be viewed en face on the plane that includes the axis of the side branch and the putative line at the entry of the occlusion. You should advance the guidewire toward the entry with its tip oriented in the opposite direc­tion to the side branch and manipulate the wire to catch a dimple at the entry by slightly altering the direction of the tip (Fig.1.128). During manipulation, you should check the IVUS screen to determine whether the tip of the guidewire is oriented in the correct direction at the bifurcation and is located at an appropriate entry point and to make ne adjust­ments to these parameters. If an assistant can relay the IVUS ndings, the interventionalist can continuously focus on the uoroscopic image without the need to alternately check the IVUS screen.
If the tip of the guidewire cannot catch a dimple at the CTO entry, you should create a more acute curve at the tip. If the guidewire still fails to catch a dimple after being reshaped in this way, you should exchange it for another guidewire with a higher tip load.
If the tip of the guidewire goes into the subintimal space from the main vessel distal to the entry of the occlusion, you should make the tip curve more acute (Fig.1.128b). In con­trast, if the tip of the guidewire enters the subintimal space from the main vessel proximal to the CTO entry, you should make the curve at the tip larger and less acute (Fig.1.128c). While keeping the IVUS probe at the CTO entry, you should advance the tip of the guidewire into the side branch and then pull the wire back with its tip oriented in the opposite direc­tion. Then you should perform ne adjustment to direct the guidewire tip toward the true lumen at the entry of the occlu­sion using the IVUS image. With the tip oriented toward the true lumen, you should push it forward slightly to nd a dim­ple. If the tip catches a dimple, you should check the IVUS image to determine whether the tip is still oriented toward the true lumen.
It is almost impossible to penetrate calcied plaque cap­ping the entry of an occlusion (in a main branch). In this case, you will need to nd a non-calcied part of proximal cap that can be penetrated, but entry at such a site often leads to subintimal tracking. If you fail to achieve reentry of the guidewire into the true lumen, it becomes necessary to attempt the reverse CART technique (described later).
Fig. 1.128 IVUS-guided
penetration of the entry to a CTO at the ostium of a side branch. This is a typical example of a target vessel with a CTO branching from the larger curvature of the patent main vessel. A guidewire can be advanced smoothly to the entry of the occlusion (a). Then the guidewire tip may be advanced to a point distal to the dimple, so that it enters the subintimal space on the distal side of the occlusion (b). If the guidewire tip is curved as shown in the upper gure, it should be reshaped with a slightly smaller and more acute curve, as shown in (c), to catch the dimple
86
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
1.6.4.13 IVUS-Guided Wiring: False Lumen Technique
When the guidewire is found to be in the subintimal space at the exit of an occlusion, there may be no side branch avail­able, and parallel wiring may fail. It may also be impossible to attempt retrograde PCI because of the lack of a track­able collateral channel. In this situation, you should attempt IVUS-guided tracking of the true lumen by introducing an IVUS catheter into the existing subintimal space from the entry of the occlusion (Fig.1.129). You should explore the site of obstruction at the CTO entry with the tip of a guide­wire oriented toward the true lumen and parallel with the IVUS catheter/guidewire. In this situation, it is best to manipulate the guidewire toward the predicted true lumen based on uoroscopic images and to conrm the direction of the lumen by IVUS.On uoroscopic images, the true lumen is usually present on the smaller curvature of the occluded vessel. In general, a guidewire deviates from the hard true lumen into a false lumen in the direction of the larger curva­ture of the occluded vessel, as indicated by the nding that an IVUS catheter or other device tends to easily run along the larger curvature of a curved occlusion.
If there is a blocking point (obstruction), you should patiently rotate the guidewire within ±90 degrees at that location (xed point rotation) until it enters the occlusion. This is to ensure penetration of the guidewire into the true lumen because previous guidewires presumably deviated
into the subintimal space at this point. After penetration into the lesion, you should advance the guidewire within the true lumen if there is no intimal calcication and if the lumen is clearly visible on IVUS.If there is intimal calci­cation, you cannot use IVUS to conrm that the advanc­ing guidewire remains within the true lumen. In the rst window without calcied plaque that is found as the IVUS catheter is advanced, you should conrm the position of the true lumen and estimate the course for the guidewire to follow. Then you should advance the guidewire toward the predicted point parallel with the IVUS catheter/guide­wire to nd a direction in which it can easily go forward. When the guidewire is about to reach the plaque window, you should check if it is still in the true lumen. If it is, you should further advance the IVUS catheter/guidewire and repeat your IVUS check until the guidewire is advanced into the true lumen at the exit.
If the guidewire is found to be outside the true lumen at the window, you should pull it back to the previous window where it was conrmed to be in the true lumen and then try to advance it through the true lumen up to the next window.
For IVUS-guided wiring by the false lumen technique, it is better to use an IVUS catheter with a short nose. The Eagle Eye (Volcano) was commonly used at one time, and the double R type NaviFocus WR (Terumo) has also become popular in recent years (Fig.1.130). Currently, I also use the latter catheter.
1.6 Antegrade Approach
87
a
e
Proximal
bc d
IVUS
Distal
IVUS-Guided True Lumen Tracking
f
Tru GW
Fig. 1.129 IVUS-guided wiring: False lumen technique. (a & b) CTO
of the RCA (Segment #3), with reattempted IVUS-guided wiring by the false lumen technique. (c & d) Antegrade PCI resulted in deviation of the guidewire into the subintimal space, so the strategy was switched to retrograde PCI, but attempts at collateral channel tracking failed. A sec­ond antegrade guidewire manipulated by the parallel wire technique
also failed to reach the true lumen. (e) IVUS showed that the guidewire was in the subintimal space. (f) While the position of the true lumen was checked by IVUS, a guidewire was advanced along the predicted correct route. (g) After the guidewire reached the exit, it was conrmed to be in the true lumen, and PCI was completed by stent implantation
88
IVUS
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
Proximal
Distal
g
Fig. 1.129 (continued)
9mm
distal marker Transducer
Fig. 1.130 Photograph of the NaviFocus WR.The NaviFocus WR has
a short nose, with a distance of only 9 mm between the tip and the transducer
1.6.4.14 Conrmation ofCrossing theTrue Lumen andPoints toBeConsidered After Crossing
As mentioned above, crossing the true lumen with a guide­wire is rst recognized by a sudden reduction of resistance and almost spontaneous advancement of the wire. However, this also occurs when the guidewire has gone outside the vessel wall. These two different situations can usually be distinguished easily on the basis of the movement and route of the guidewire, but sometimes may be confused. Crossing through the true lumen has to be conrmed by collateral (usually contralateral) imaging.
After a stiff tapered CTO guidewire enters a relatively soft false lumen, resistance to advancing the wire is reduced considerably, which may lead to the misunderstanding that the guidewire has entered the true lumen. The guidewire is tracking the true lumen if it does not show deection when advanced slowly without rotation and with the tip oriented medially to the curve of the occluded vessel. However, sub­intimal tracking must be suspected if there is even slight deection of the tip when the guidewire is advanced a little. To check whether the guidewire is in the true or false lumen, it must be advanced without rotation, since a guidewire that is advanced with tip rotation may move forward in a false lumen without showing deection in response to even light pressure.
After the guidewire has reached the exit of the occlusion, you should perform collateral imaging to determine whether it is inside or outside the true lumen. If the guidewire has crossed the CTO in a false lumen, you should choose from the following strategies: (1) attempt to cross the occlusion through the true lumen with the same guidewire, (2) attempt to cross through the true lumen with a second guidewire (parallel wiring or seesaw wiring), or (3) switch the strategy to the retrograde approach.