Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
102 Мб
Скачать
ab c
a
b
c
d
Inflection point
Vessel lumen distal to the
1.6 Antegrade Approach
69
Fig. 1.101 Reasons for formation of an inection point. (a) An inec-
tion point forms in a guidewire when it passes through a winding micro­channel in a CTO, especially if the channel is lined with calcied tissue. (b) In an orthogonal projection, a guidewire that leaves the true lumen inside a CTO and enters the subintimal space will be viewed as deviat­ing from the predicted course of the target vessel. Once it has entered the subintimal space, the tip of the guidewire will only advance tangen­tially to its initial direction. If you attempt to return such a guidewire to
the predicted course of the target vessel, it changes direction to the right or left when viewed in an orthogonal projection. This is why an inec­tion point is formed near the site where the guidewire enters the subin­timal space. (c) If a guidewire enters the subintimal space at the entry of an occlusion, an inection point will also be formed if an attempt is made to return it to the true lumen. Imaging in two projections is useful (essential) for detecting the inection point
occlusion
Fig. 1.102 If the guidewire enters the subintimal space. (a) A guide-
wire that is outside the true lumen at the exit of a CTO is found to have abruptly changed direction (inection point) within the occlusion. (b) You should withdraw the guidewire to the inection point and explore to nd a new direction in which the guidewire can be advanced without inection. (c) If the guidewire is blocked by hard tissue when its tip is
oriented in the direction opposite to that of inection, you should x the tip at that point and perform small xed point rotations until the wire advances. (d) If the wire advances without deviation or inection, it is likely to remain in the true lumen. If the guidewire cannot be advanced, you should replace it with another one that has a higher tip load and manipulate the new guidewire in the same way
70
a
b
Guidewire with a higher tip load
a
b
c
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
when antegrade PCI should be switched to either of these strategies largely depends on the interventionalist’s expertise and on the angiography equipment that is available (mono­plane or biplane). My opinions on these issues are summa­rized below.
Standard tip curve
1. If you are using monoplane angiography equipment, you
should switch from the antegrade approach to the retro-
grade approach earlier. With monoplane imaging equip-
ment, it is necessary to rotate the detector through 90
degrees repeatedly to assist ne guidewire manipulation.
Even if a retrograde channel appears to be a little difcult
to track, you should try collateral channel tracking and
attempt to cross the CTO by the retrograde approach,
Guidewire with a more acute tip curve
with the expectation that the guidewire can be advanced
through the true lumen even when manipulated with guid-
ance by monoplane angiography. It is safer to try to
accomplish PCI by the kissing wire technique or the
reverse CART technique using a continuous landmark.
Fig. 1.103 If the guidewire enters the subintimal space despite xed
point rotation (a). (b) Penetration should be reattempted after the guide­wire tip is reshaped with a more acute second curve of the same size. If this retry also fails, exchange the guidewire for one with a higher tip load
2. If a calcied region can be used as a landmark, you can
continue trying to cross the occlusion with a single wire
for a longer time. If obvious calcication is found during
PCI, you should be more likely to switch to the retrograde
approach. If the calcication is obscured during pro-
longed PCI, you should try to use a second guidewire as a
new landmark.
3. If there is no calcication to use as a landmark, you
should try to correct the guidewire route several times. If
these attempts fail, you should then use the parallel wire
technique. Since a guidewire with a stiff shaft, such as the
Conquest Pro, is likely to create a large dissection in a
relatively soft vessel wall, you should switch to the
retrograde approach earlier whenever possible (after a
favorable collateral channel is found).
4. When it becomes difcult to obtain good images of the
vessel lumen distal to the occlusion on uoroscopy, you
should start retrograde PCI.
5. If a guidewire being manipulated in an old RCA ostial
occlusion enters a small side branch and goes outside the
Fig. 1.104 Blocking (a) versus trapping (b) of a guidewire tip. A
guidewire that is trapped can no longer be advanced, but will not enter the subintimal space as shown in (c). After prolonged manipulation, a trapped guidewire becomes difcult to withdraw, and forcible attempts to withdraw it may cause disruption and retention of the coil within the occlusion. Therefore, never persist with manipulation of a trapped guidewire
vessel wall just distal to the entry point, you should
directly switch to retrograde PCI without considering the
parallel wire technique.
6. If a guidewire being manipulated in a long occlusion of
the RCA enters a small side branch and then goes outside
the vessel wall around Segment #3, where the anatomy of
the target vessel is absolutely unknown, it is better to
Selection of the Parallel Wire Technique or Retrograde Approach and Timing for Switching to These Strategies
If the rst guidewire has reached the vessel distal to the CTO (but is outside the true lumen) or if the rst guidewire cannot be advanced further within a long occlusion, you should then use the parallel wire technique or switch strategies to the retrograde approach. Which strategy should be chosen and
choose the retrograde approach.
7. If there is no accessible collateral channel whatsoever, you
will have no choice but to use the parallel wire technique
via the antegrade approach. If there is only a very difcult
collateral channel, you should generally try for longer to
succeed with antegrade PCI.If collateral channel tracking
fails, there is no choice but to resume antegrade PCI.
a
b
1.6 Antegrade Approach
71
8. If both the retrograde approach and parallel wiring are unsuccessful, you should attempt IVUS-guided crossing of the CTO.
The situation is the same if there is a subtle island of contrast medium within an occlusion. If the guidewire has denitely reached the island, you should advance a microcatheter over the guidewire to the island and then perform tip injection and guidewire exchange through the
Manipulation in the Vessel Lumen Distal to the
microcatheter.
Occlusion
When a tapered CTO guidewire reaches the vessel lumen distal to the occlusion, you will usually feel a sudden decrease of resistance. A guidewire that has entered the distal true lumen will advance without deection of the tip when pushed forward slightly with its tip oriented medially relative to the curvature of the vessel. If the tip is deected when the guidewire is advanced slightly, the tip must have deviated into the subintimal space or been blocked by pro­truding plaque, since the tip will never be deected if it remains within the true lumen. Because of the shape of its tip, a tapered CTO guidewire creates resistance when pass­ing through a hard occlusion, and this may make it difcult to determine whether the guidewire is in the true lumen or has gone outside it. If you become unsure of this, you should push the guidewire forward slightly while rotating it within ±90 degrees with its tip oriented medially against the curva­ture of the vessel. If the guidewire can be advanced without deection of the tip, it must be within the true lumen. If the tip is deected, it must be in the subintimal space or blocked by hard plaque, and you should reattempt intimal tracking.
If the guidewire has successfully crossed a CTO through the true lumen, but is likely to damage a tightly stenosed segment distal to the occlusion (Fig.1.105a), you can per­form tip injection and guidewire exchange without damag­ing the distal segment if a microcatheter can be advanced to the distal lumen before the guidewire tip reaches the steno­sis (Fig.1.105b). If the microcatheter is vigorously pushed forward or pulled back over the guidewire, the tip of the guidewire will also move forward and backward, potentially causing damage to the stenosed distal segment. Therefore, you should advance the microcatheter with a steady force while rotating it to-and-fro until it crosses the lesion. To facilitate penetration by the microcatheter, you may use a very small balloon, but you should minimize its vibration to suppress forward and backward movement of the guide­wire tip. If a Tornus microcatheter has crossed the occlusion, guidewire exchange can be performed, but not tip injection.
You should use the anchoring technique to stabilize the guiding catheter and consolidate backup.
Using a child catheter (e.g., a GuideLiner) or deep engagement of a guiding catheter as small as 5 Fr may help to improve pushability.
Fig. 1.105 If a guidewire that has crossed a CTO through the true
lumen might injure a distal stenosed segment (a). A microcatheter should be advanced over the guidewire to the coronary artery lumen distal to the occlusion (b), and the guidewire should be exchanged for one with a lower tip load and an appropriate tip curve
72
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
1.6.4.9 Setting aLandmark
Whether you are performing antegrade or retrograde PCI, the presence of a landmark can provide assistance for assess­ing the anatomy of the target vessel and makes guidewire manipulation much easier. Therefore, setting a landmark is an important key to the success of antegrade PCI.
Calcication and subtle islands of contrast medium are some of the landmarks that are often available within or around coronary arteries (Table 1.6). Other potential landmarks that become visible with injection of contrast medium are collateral channels connected to the vessel distal to the occlusion and side branches arising from the occluded segment. Devices that are advanced toward the occlusion and can be used as landmarks include a paral­lel wire and the tip of a retrograde guidewire. Among these possibilities, calcication, a parallel wire, and the tip of a retrograde guidewire are permanent landmarks that will always remain visible and help to determine the dis­tance from the guidewire being manipulated. I frequently employ such permanent landmarks because of their great usefulness.
The principle methods of manipulating a guidewire are to orient its tip in the direction of the route through the occluded target vessel determined from a landmark, rotate it within ±90 degrees (xed point rotation), and push it forward with minimal force while seeking the direction in which it can be advanced. If there is a soft central core inside a relatively hard vessel or plaque, you should perform to-and-fro rota­tion (plane rotation) of the guidewire.
Table 1.6 Possible landmarks
Landmarks Natural Continuous Calcication Collateral angiography Subtle islands of contrast Side branch from the occlusion site (collateral
ow) Parallel wire (seesaw wiring) × Retrograde wire ×
× × ×
Landmarks, Imaging Equipment, and Fluoroscopy Angle
To maximize the detection of calcication, a high-resolution cineangiography apparatus must be available and must be cal­ibrated appropriately. I think that biplane cineangiography is essential, and viewing in at least two orthogonal projections is necessary for this purpose. Some sites of calcication can be clearly viewed in one projection, but are hardly visible in another projection that is orthogonal to the rst one. If the main vessel and its side branch can be clearly distinguished in one projection, the two vessels will overlap each other in another projection that is orthogonal to the rst one.
Let us consider this point using the LAD as an example.
When the midportion of the LAD is viewed in two orthog­onal projections, the AP+CR and LL+CR projections (see Figs. 1.32 and 1.33), calcication is clearly visualized in the AP+ CR projection and easily distinguished from the Dg and SB.Therefore, calcication can be readily used as a landmark in this projection. In the LL+ CR projection, the LAD and the Dg overlap, as does calcication in these arter­ies. The difcult uoroscopic conditions of this projection also make it hard to demonstrate calcication, but a calcied area may still be used as a landmark, if recognizable. If there is no recognizable calcied landmark, you can only check whether the guidewire has deviated from the vessel lumen distal to the occlusion based on the estimated route of the true lumen. It is easier to navigate the tip of the guidewire toward the coronary artery lumen distal to the occlusion in the AP+CR projection. However, if the guidewire cannot reach the true distal lumen, deviation from the true lumen can often only be recognized in the LL+CR projection (Fig.1.106). When using the parallel wire technique, you should attempt to advance the second guidewire parallel to the route of the rst guidewire in the AP+CR projection and should use the LL+CR projection to explore whether the second guidewire can be advanced through the true lumen from the proximal segment of the occluded vessel (Fig.1.106).
Conversely, if the rst guidewire appears to be outside the true lumen in both projections (Fig.1.107), you should change the projections so that the guidewire is viewed as being inside the true lumen in one projection, while it will deviate more markedly from the true lumen in the other new projection (Fig.1.108). If the direction of the guidewire is corrected while using the latter projection, successful cross­ing of the lesion through the true lumen is more likely to be achieved.
1.6 Antegrade Approach
73
a
c d
b
Fig. 1.106 Occlusion of the proximal LAD. (a) AP+CR image. (b)
LL + CR image. The rst guidewire was manipulated under uoro­scopic guidance in the AP+CR view. The guidewire seemed to have reached the LAD lumen distal to the occlusion in the AP+CR view (c), but it was seen to have deviated upward considerably in the LL+CR view (d). In this view, an inection point (arrow) can clearly be recognized (e). Using the seesaw wiring technique, a second guide­wire was advanced along the rst guidewire to a site just proximal to the inection point. In the AP+CR view, the second guidewire that
was advanced in parallel with the rst guidewire was seen to be cross­ing the occlusion through the true lumen (f). In the LL+CR view, the second guidewire was advanced around the inection point with the tip oriented downward while performing xed point rotation to explore for a blockage. After this manipulation, the guidewire was also seen to cross the occlusion through the true lumen in the latter projection (g). An enlarged view (h) clearly shows that the second guidewire has been advanced without creating non-inection point, like that in the rst guidewire
74
In Projection A, the occlusion can be viewed orthogonal to its longitudinal axis
Projection B is orthogonal to
occlusion
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
e
g
f
h
Fig. 1.106 (continued)
Fig. 1.107 Guidewire direction relative to the distal true lumen.
Projections A and B are orthogonal to each other around the longitudinal axis of the occluded target vessel. In both projections, the guidewire devi­ates from the true lumen. These two projections cannot show the maximum deviation of the guidewire or the accurate location of the inection point and therefore will not be useful for correcting the direction of the wire
Projection A around the longitudinal axis of the
to Projection A around the
occlusion
In Projection A, the occlusion can be viewed at an angle orthogonal to its longitudinal axis
a
b
c
1.6 Antegrade Approach
Projection B is orthogonal
longitudinal axis of the
Fig. 1.108 Guidewire direction relative to the distal true lumen.
Projections A and B are orthogonal to each other. These two projec­tions may be obtained by modifying the projections shown in
1.107. Unlike the previous gure, the guidewire appears to be
Fig. inside the true lumen in Projection A, but is outside the true lumen in Projection B.The maximum deviation of the guidewire from the true lumen can be viewed in Projection B, and the inection point is more clearly recognizable. Using two such projections makes it easier to correct the direction of the guidewire, irrespective of whether you are employing a single guidewire or the parallel wire technique. While keeping the rst guidewire in Projection A or advancing the second guidewire along the rst one in this projection, you should explore for a new route that runs to the left from near the inection point in Projection B
75
generally accepted that obstruction by hard tissue (calcied or brous plaque) in the true lumen often causes a guidewire to deviate into the relatively soft subintimal tissue. While this concept is not supported by scientic evidence, it has the fol­lowing empirical background.
After being blocked by hard tissue, a guidewire may slip and then go forward when pushed. This can suggest to the interventionalist that it has penetrated a hard cap and advanced into the distal true lumen. Although a guidewire exhibiting such behavior occasionally does enter the distal true lumen as expected, angiography almost always shows deviation of the wire into the subintimal space. If the tip of a stiffer guidewire is pressed up against the obstruction and xed point rotation within ±90 degrees is performed, the wire can often follow an intraluminal route through the occlusion and eventually reach the distal true lumen.
1.6.4.10 Parallel Wire Technique
Choice oftheSecond Guidewire (Figs.1.109, 1.110,
1.111, 1.112, 1.113, and1.114)
If the rst guidewire runs through the subintimal space and fails to reach the distal true lumen, you should use it as a landmark and try to cross the occlusion with another guide­wire. As the second guidewire, I always choose one with a higher tip load than that of the rst wire. This is because it is
Fig. 1.109 Parallel wire technique. (a) The rst guidewire has devi-
ated into the subintimal space. You should only withdraw the micro­catheter by using Nanto’s technique or a Kusabi catheter. (b, c) You should insert another guidewire into the microcatheter and attempt to nd the true lumen with the second wire while using the rst guidewire as a landmark
76
ab
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
Fig. 1.110 CTO of the RCA
(Segment #1). Imaging of the RCA segment distal to the occlusion via a bridging collateral. (a) LAO view. (b) RAO view
a b
Fig. 1.111 The rst guidewire. At the exit point,
the rst guidewire deviates slightly rightward in the LAO view (a), while it deviates leftward in the RAO view (b)
ab
1.6 Antegrade Approach
Fig. 1.112 Enlargement of the LAO image shown in Fig.1.111. The
guidewire is suspected to have undergone inection near the point indi­cated by an arrow. The optimal guidewire route from the distal side of the occlusion (solid blue line) probably starts from the distal true lumen parallel with the rst guidewire and runs toward the proximal part of the occlusion. It will cross the rst guidewire at some point and then will approximate and reach the rst wire in the proximal true lumen. The optimal guidewire route from the proximal side of the occlusion (solid red line) is most likely to run downward just proximal to the inection point, after which it will form an arch, cross the rst guidewire, and then run slightly leftward
77
Fig. 1.114 The same PCI procedure shown in Fig.1.111. From Point
1in the RAO (b), the second guidewire could be advanced within the true lumen. It crossed the rst guidewire around the inection point in the LAO (a), as expected. Thus, a guidewire that deviates into the sub­intimal space often enters it at the most proximal inection point
Fig. 1.113 Enlargement of the RAO image shown in Fig.1.111. The
rst guidewire may have undergone inection at any of three points (arrows). The optimal guidewire route will follow the yellow line if the
Seesaw Wiring (Fig.1.115)
If the rst guidewire eventually fails to penetrate a hard obstruction in an occlusion, you should use it as a land­mark and attempt to penetrate the obstruction with a slightly stiffer guidewire. Instead of the parallel wire technique, which involves withdrawing the microcatheter over the rst guidewire and using it to advance the second guidewire,
rst guidewire underwent inection at Point 1, while the blue line indi­cates the optimal route for inection at Point 2, and the red line indi­cates the optimal route for inection at Point 3
you may advance the second guidewire through a second microcatheter while leaving the microcatheter of the rst guidewire in place (seesaw wiring). If the second guidewire is also blocked by the obstruction, you should exchange the rst guidewire for an even stiffer wire and then advance it through the rst microcatheter to cross the CTO by using the second guidewire as a landmark.
78
a
b
c
d
a
b
c
d
Fig. 1.115 Seesaw wiring, a parallel wire method using a second
microcatheter. The rst guidewire has deviated into the subintimal space. You advance a second guidewire through a second microcatheter (a). Seesaw wiring is successful if the second guidewire enters the dis­tal true lumen (b). If the second guidewire also deviates into the subin­timal space (c), you can easily try to advance the rst guidewire through the true lumen (d). Before attempting this, you may want to exchange the rst guidewire for one with a higher tip load if the rst wire is thought to have an insufcient tip load
1 Mitsudo’s PCI Techniques forCTO
Parallel Wiring Through a Crusade Microcatheter
Here I will discuss the circumstances and reasons why a Crusade microcatheter is useful for parallel wiring or for penetrating the entrance of a CTO located in a side branch. First, a Crusade microcatheter helps a second guidewire to easily track a tortuous vessel. Second, the stiffness of a Crusade microcatheter which has accommodated the rst guidewire provides stronger backup for a second guidewire (Fig.1.116a). Third, if the side hole of the catheter happens to be oriented toward the side branch, the catheter can help to control the direction of the second guidewire and provide stronger backup to facilitate successful entry into the occlu­sion in the branch vessel (Fig.1.116b).
However, the short tip and great stiffness of the Crusade tend to bias this microcatheter and make it rather difcult to control (Fig. 1.116c–f). Accordingly, you may have to carefully adjust the curve at the guidewire tip when using a Crusade microcatheter. You may sometimes have to adjust the curves at the tip of both the Crusade microcatheter and the guidewire.
e
f
Fig. 1.116 Guidewire manipulation through a Crusade microcatheter.
(a) A Crusade microcatheter provides good backup in a relatively straight occlusion. (b) The side hole of a Crusade microcatheter is often medial to the rst guidewire that has entered a curved main branch. If the side hole faces the ostium of the branch, it will provide considerable assistance for a second guidewire to penetrate an occlusion in the branch. However, if the side branch originates from the larger curvature
of a bend in the main vessel, the side hole of the Crusade microcatheter will not always face the ostium of the branch (c & d). If the side hole is oriented toward the occlusion, a second guidewire can be easily con­trolled through a Crusade microcatheter (e). If this is not the case, the second guidewire becomes difcult to control as it needs to be manipu­lated from a more proximal point (f)