Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
102 Мб
Скачать
180
a
a
b
2 Stenting ofBifurcation Lesions
2.3.4 SB Wiring
Shaping the Tip Curve of the SB Guidewire
If POT has not been performed, the tip of the guidewire for the SB should be bent to an angle of 90° relative to its shaft, and the curve should have a radius about 1.0mm longer than the diameter of the distal MB (Fig.2.41a).
Fig. 2.41 Shape of the tip curve for the SB
guidewire. (a) Without POT: Optimal radius D
+1 to 1.5mm. (b) With POT: Optimal radius
LAD
D
+1 to 1.5mm. D
LMT
Diameter of the LMT
diameter of the LAD; D
LAD
LMT
If POT has been performed, the tip of the SB guidewire
should be bent to slightly less than 90° relative to its shaft, and the curve should have a radius about 1.0mm longer than the diameter of the proximal MB (Fig.2.41b).
You should aim for the guidewire to cross the stent
through the most distal cell at the SB ostium so that the wire comes into contact with the carina (Fig. 2.42). This mini­mizes the risk of jailing.
Optimal R DLAD 1 1. 5mm
R
DLAD
DLMT
DLCX
Optimal R D LMT 1 1.5 mm
R
Fig. 2.42 Point of stent wire crossing. (a)
Diagram of a bifurcation in a projection perpendicular to the plane encompassing both the MB and SB. (b) Diagram of the SB ostium in a projection parallel to the axis of the SB.The blue line and the blue dot indicate the optimal route of the wire and the optimal point of stent crossing, respectively. If the SB guidewire follows the route indicated by the green line, KBI will cause injury to the distal MB and the SB at the time of dilatation. If the SB guidewire follows the route indicated by the red line, KBI will result in SB jailing. A guidewire following the red or blue route can move about 1.2–2.5mm within the stent cell when pushed forward or pulled back slightly. In contrast, a guidewire following the green route can only move less than 1mm and will feel stuck (although guidewire maneuverability also depends on the stent type and strut conguration)
b
2.3 Optimal Stenting Techniques forBifurcation Lesions
181
Conrmation of Wire Crossing Through the Most Distal Cell at the SB Ostium
If the SB guidewire comes into contact with the carina when advanced slightly in a projection that allows en face observa­tion of the bifurcation, it can be considered to have crossed the stent through the most distal cell at the SB ostium (Fig.2.43). Although the shaft of the guidewire crossing into the SB is not always biased toward the carina, its tip is often biased toward the larger curvature of the SB when the radi­opaque marker passes the SB ostium. If coronary angiography is performed at this time and shows the tip of the guidewire in contact with the carina, it conrms that the wire has crossed the stent into the SB through the most distal cell. Alternatively, the SB guidewire can be anchored at a very small branch or dimple and then pushed slightly to bias it toward the carina. If coronary angiography subsequently shows that the guidewire is in contact with the carina (Fig.2.44), this conrms that the wire has crossed the stent through the most distal cell.
Thus, if the SB guidewire comes into contact with the carina when pushed toward the larger curvature, it is reason­able to consider that the wire has crossed the stent into the SB through the most distal cell at the SB ostium. Conversely, if the guidewire does not come into contact with the carina, the stent has jailed the SB, possibly to a signicant extent (Fig.2.42). For accurate radiographic assessment of SB wir­ing, coronary angiography must be performed in the optimal projection (as discussed above).
from guidewire mobility within the cell. If the SB guide­wire moves forward and back at least about 1.2 mm within a cell at the SB ostium and is in contact with the carina, you can assume that the wire has safely crossed the stent. In contrast, a virtually immobile SB guidewire has probably crossed the stent through a cell distal to the SB ostium (Fig.2.42).
If the SB guidewire crosses the stent through a cell distal to the SB ostium, it may cause dissection at the carina. In such rare cases, culotte stenting may be indicated.
a
b
1. If the SB guidewire does not come into contact with the carina when it is advanced appropriately, you should remove the guidewire and make another attempt to cross the stent through the most distal cell.
2. If the SB guidewire crosses the stent through a cell that is actually distal to the SB ostium, KBI may induce carinal injury by the most distal strut (Fig.2.42). Whether or not the cell is distal to the SB ostium can be roughly assessed
Fig. 2.43 Conrmation of crossing the stent into the SB.A guidewire
is advanced with its bias toward the larger curvature of the SB immedi­ately after entering the branch. If the guidewire does not come into con­tact with the carina (a), you should reattempt crossing the stent by the optimal route that brings the wire into contact with the carina (b)
182
ab
a
b
2 Stenting ofBifurcation Lesions
Factors That Prevent the Wire Crossing Through the Most Distal Cell
1. Plaque shift or dissection (not carinal shift) caused by MB stenting that leads to SB ostial stenosis (Fig.2.45a).
2. Severe tortuosity of the target vessel.
3. Using a suboptimal uoroscopy projection that mislead­ingly suggests a guidewire has crossed the stent through the most distal cell at the SB when it has actually crossed through a more proximal cell. This is often a problem in LMT bifurcation stenting (Fig.2.45b).
If the SB perfuses a large territory or has a diame-
ter3.0mm, you should perform IVUS after KBI to check whether the SB guidewire crossed the stent through the most distal cell at the SB.If necessary, you should reattempt to cross the stent into the SB through the most distal cell.
Fig. 2.44 Conrmation of wire crossing through the most distal cell at
the SB ostium. If an SB guidewire is anchored in a very small branch (a) and then pushed forward (b), its proximal portion will be deected toward the larger curvature of the vessel. If the deected guidewire comes into contact with the carina, you may assume that the guidewire has crossed the stent into the SB through the most distal cell at the branch. If this does not happen, the guidewire has probably not crossed the stent through the most distal cell. Therefore, you should reattempt crossing the stent through a more distal cell
Fig. 2.45 Failure to cross the
stent through the most distal cell at the SB. (a) After stenting the central vessel, dissection occurred in the left vessel and interfered with wiring it. The right vessel was very tortuous and also difcult to rewire. (b) The SB guidewire appeared to have crossed the stent into the SB through the most distal cell on coronary angiography, but IVUS showed it crossing the stent through a central cell. Using a suboptimal CAG projection led to this error
r rrrr r
pd ddddn
2
1222324
22
  ,
2.3 Optimal Stenting Techniques forBifurcation Lesions
183
Removing a Jailed Guidewire
I limit the stent balloon ination pressure to 14atm so as to prevent failure to remove the jailed wire. I also limit the ination pressure for POT (mentioned later) to 14atm. A jailed guidewire should be removed after rst withdrawing the Crusade catheter. Removing the jailed guidewire is usu­ally easy, even after withdrawal of the Crusade catheter, although there is some resistance. If a jailed bare wire proves difcult to remove, you should advance a balloon catheter over the wire and position the balloon near the proximal edge of the stent (Fig.2.46). The balloon may facilitate removal of the guidewire by reducing friction between the wire and the wall of the proximal MB and by helping the jailed part of the guidewire to become more coaxial with its proximal part.
With the aid of a balloon, you can usually remove a jailed guidewire without too much difculty, but you may some­times encounter great resistance. In this case, you should pull the guidewire back strongly without pushing the balloon in. By doing so, you can usually remove the guidewire without deforming the stent. However, when using a PROMUS Element stent, the proximal edge of the stent may be deformed by the tip of a balloon catheter advanced along the jailed guidewire. Some stent deformation patterns prevent introduction of a balloon into the MB stent. When removing a jailed guidewire, you should take care not to cause such stent deformation. To overcome this potential problem, I rec­ommend introducing a balloon into the MB stent before removing the jailed guidewire (Fig.2.46). Even if the MB stent becomes deformed, the previously introduced kissing balloon can still be inated to achieve optimal stent apposi­tion. Since balloons are absolutely required for subsequent KBI, introducing a balloon into the MB stent does not com­plicate the procedure; the only difference is whether the bal­loon is introduced before or after removal of the jailed guidewire.
a
b
Fig. 2.46 Removing a jailed guidewire trapped by a stent. A balloon is
advanced over the jailed guidewire (a) until it is close to the proximal end of the stent to facilitate removal of the guidewire. When the guide­wire is pulled back, the balloon may be pushed into the stent and deform it. To avoid problems due to stent deformation, a balloon can be intro­duced into the MB stent (b) before removing the jailed guidewire. Even if the stent becomes deformed, the previously introduced balloon can still be inated to achieve optimal stent apposition
Kissing Balloon Ination (KBI)
To discuss the optimal size of the kissing balloons and the optimal ination pressures for bifurcation stenting, let us consider the equations that can be used to predict the diam­eters of the MB and side branch(es) and to calculate the dilated diameter of the proximal MB after KBI.
Before performing KBI for bifurcation stenting, I have used the following equation to calculate the dilated diameter of the proximal MB after ballooning since around the mid-1990s:
1. Area conservation equation (Fig.2.47)
where rp is the diameter of the parent vessel and rdn is the diameter of the nth daughter vessel.
This equation was not intended to accurately predict the diameter of one (parent) vessel from the known diameters of two (daughter) vessels. Instead, it shows that performing KBI for a bifurcation lesion always dilates the proximal MB to a diameter that can be calculated from the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the two balloons used. Neither this equation nor Murray’s law (presented below) can accurately predict the actual diameter of a blood vessel in the body because the vessel may have undergone positive or negative remodeling and because vessel size does not change in pre­cise units of 0.25 millimeters. I reiterate that KBI actually dilates the proximal MB to a diameter that can be calculated from the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the two balloons used. Therefore, if the proximal MB has a smaller diameter than the calculated diameter, you should inate the kissing balloons at a low pressure or use undersized balloons for the MB and SB in order to prevent dissection of the proximal MB.On the other hand, if the proximal MB has a diameter equal to or larger than the calculated diameter, KBI may be performed at a relatively high pressure. The primary aim of using this equation is to raise awareness of the need to make such adjustments to the size of the kissing balloons and the balloon ination pressure. It should be noted that Murray’s law (presented below) is quite useless for this purpose. Indeed, this law is used to predict the normal diameter of each occluded vessel at a bifurcation CTO.Even in that case, the area conservation equation is needed to conrm whether the proximal MB can be safely dilated by kissing balloons of a size compatible with the predicted vessel diameters.
Needless to say, the optimal size of the balloon for POT should not be based on the theoretical (calculated) diameter of the proximal MB, but on the diameter observed by IVUS or optical coherence tomography (OCT). At a trifurcation, it is also easy to adjust the ination pressures for triple KBI by
184
  325259625625 21 5464
.. .. ...
R
2 Stenting ofBifurcation Lesions
comparing the observed diameter of the proximal MB with its predicted diameter after dilatation calculated from the diameters of the three distal vessels measured by IVUS.If the observed diameter is greater than the predicted diameter, the ination pressure should be about 10atm. If the observed value is smaller than the predicted value, the kissing balloons should be inated at a low pressure of about 6atm.
For example, let us assume that triple KBI is planned for a trifurcation lesion involving the LAD, the high lateral branch (HL), and the LCX.If IVUS shows that the diameters of the three branches are 3.0, 2.5, and 2.5mm, respectively, the dilated LMT diameter triple KBI can be calculated as follows:
222
Assuming that the LMT diameter is measured as 4.7mm by IVUS, POT may be performed by inating a 4.5-mm bal­loon at a high pressure (14–20atm), and triple KBI can be performed at standard pressure (8–10 atm). On the other hand, if the LMT diameter is 4.4mm, POT should be per­formed by inating a 4.5 mm balloon at a lower pressure (10 atm), and triple KBI should be done by inating
2.25mm balloons in the HL and LCX and a 3.0mm balloon in the LAD at the standard pressure (8–10atm) (√2.25
2
+2
.252+32=√19.13≈4.4). If the three kissing balloons are 3,
2.5, and 2.5mm in diameter, respectively, balloon ination should be done at a low pressure of about 6atm.
md
Rmp
Balloon 1
Rb
Balloon 2
Ab1 Ab2
2
2
Fig. 2.47 Area conservation equation: R
of the proximal main vessel; R
2
2
R
=R
p
the side branch. Ab1 Area of balloon1. Ab2 Area of balloon2
2
+R
d1
; Rmd diameter of the distal main vessel; Rb diameter of
d2
diameter of the nth daughter branch.
dn
=R
mp
+R
md
2
. Rmp diameter
b
r
pd ddddn
1
2
3
4
//
.
     
r rr
mp md b


067..

..
2.3 Optimal Stenting Techniques forBifurcation Lesions
185
2. Murray’s law (Table2.2)
Murray’s law describes the diameters of a bifurcated tube with a certain rheological friction coefcient that is used to model a bifurcated human vessel. The equation is:
73
73
rrrr r
 
73
73
73 73////
where rp is the diameter of the parent vessel and rdn is the diameter of the nth daughter vessel.
If there are only two daughter vessels, the equation can be simplied as follows:
where rmp is the diameter of the proximal MB, rmd is the diameter of the distal MB, and rb is the diameter of the SB.
However, I measure the diameters of the individual vessels by IVUS and OCT to determine the size of each balloon for POT and KBI, and I never used this formula to estimate them.
Murray’s law is also impracticable for triple KBI because it requires complicated calculations. It is quite doubtful that such theoretical values can be useful for bifurcation stenting. The actual size of a patient’s vessel is not always rheologi-
cally optimal and often tends to be suboptimal due to vascu­lar remodeling and plaque deposition. Despite these reservations, I will discuss the use of this formula for pre­dicting vessel size at a bifurcation before KBI.
According to Table 2.2, a vessel branching into two daughter vessels of equal diameter (3.5mm) is predicted to have a diameter of 4.7 mm immediately upstream of the bifurcation (4.7
(7/3)
=37.0037.20).
KBI with two 3.5-mm balloons can be predicted to dilate the proximal MB to a diameter of 5.0mm as follows:
22
 
35 35 24 50 25 050
.. ..
mm
Even if the diameter of the proximal MB is observed to be
4.7mm, the same as that predicted by Murray’s law, should KBI be performed using two 3.5-mm balloons?
Based on the area conservation equation, it would be rec­ommended to gradually inate the two kissing balloons at a low pressure or to downsize one balloon to 3.25mm in order to prevent injury to the proximal MB.This is why I recom­mend using the area conservation equation to predict the dilated diameter of the proximal MB, rather than using a for­mula that just predicts the size of the MB at a bifurcation.
Table 2.2 Predicted size of the main vessel according to Murray’s law
f
as
2.25 13.26 15.11 17.23 19.61 22.28 25.23 28.48 32.03 40.06
2.5 16.96 19.08 21.46 24.13 27.08 30.33 33.88 41.91
2.75 21.20 23.58 26.25 29.20 32.45 36.00 44.03
3.0 25.96 28.63 31.58 34.83 38.38 46.41
3.25 31.30 34.25 37.50 41.05 49.03
3.5 37.20 40.05 44.00 52.03
3.75 43.70 47.25 55.28
4.0 50.80 58.83
4.5 68.86
5.0 42.75
5.5 53.40
6.0 65.42
2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 3.25 3.5 3.75 4.0 4.5
6.63 8.43 10.60 12.98 15.65 18.60 21.85 25.40 33.43
186
2 Stenting ofBifurcation Lesions
Delivery of Kissing Balloons
1. As kissing balloons, use a high-pressure balloon for the MB and a balloon with a small soft tip for the SB.For reasons of medical economy, the balloons that were employed for pre-dilatation are generally reused.
2. In principle, the balloon for the MB is delivered rst and then the balloon for the SB.This is because the MB stent may be deformed during delivery of the SB balloon, and such deformation may preclude subsequent delivery of the MB balloon. Another reason is that the MB balloon can be used to assist delivery of the SB balloon. While introduc­ing a balloon into the stent, you should take care to prevent unnecessary deformation of the stent struts by the tip of the balloon or its irregular surface. This is particularly important for 2-link stents that are prone to deformation, such as the PROMUS Element and Nobori stents.
3. If the MB balloon cannot be delivered, you should clarify whether this is because the balloon tip is being blocked by the edge of the stent or because of excessive friction between the shoulder or body of the balloon and the stent. You can easily distinguish between these two causes. If the distal balloon marker is several millimeters from the stent edge, the rst cause is more likely, while if the balloon marker is very close to the stent edge, the tip of the balloon must have entered the stent and the second cause is more likely.
(1) Blocking of the Balloon Tip by the Stent Edge
To deliver a balloon into a stent, you should push the bal-
loon very gently and advance it very slowly. If the proximal edge of the stent is in the proximal part of an ostium or at a vessel angle, the tip of a kissing balloon or a post-dilatation balloon may be blocked by the stent edge so that the balloon cannot be advanced with minimal force. However, an attempt to forcibly advance the balloon can easily lead to stent defor­mation. This risk is particularly high when the stent shows suboptimal apposition in a proximal MB with a large diam­eter (before POT or KBI). If the balloon is advanced rapidly, it can deform the stent immediately on coming into contact with it. Stent deformation induced by the balloon may be mild, such as slight disturbance of the stent strut congura­tion. However, the balloon can elevate one or more stent struts, which may further inhibit balloon delivery and could possibly result in catastrophic stent deformation. Continued attempts to advance the balloon may also cause similar severe deformation of the stent. To successfully deliver a blocked balloon into the stent without deforming the stent struts, you can use any of the following procedures:
1. Pull the balloon back to straighten the balloon shaft and then push it in slightly. Never continue to push it strongly into the stent.
2. Change the orientation of the guiding catheter to separate the balloon tip from the stent.
3. Pull the balloon back a little (to straighten the guidewire) and then immediately push it forward slightly.
4. Use the buddy wire technique (Fig.2.48a).
5. Use the buddy balloon technique (Fig.2.48b).
6. If even the buddy balloon technique is ineffective, keep the buddy balloon in place and exchange the kissing bal­loon for a new low-prole balloon.
(2) Friction Between the Shoulder or Body of the Balloon and the Stent
If the balloon has been used for pre-dilatation, you should
withdraw it into the guiding catheter and inate it at about 10atm inside the catheter. Then immediately deate the bal­loon and advance it into the stent again. If this procedure fails to deliver the balloon, you should completely remove the balloon and rewrap it. If the rewrapped balloon still can­not be delivered, you should try the buddy wire technique (Fig.2.48a). After failure of this technique, you should use the buddy balloon technique (Fig.2.48b). The buddy bal­loon technique rarely fails, but if it does, you should exchange the balloon for a new low-prole balloon.
4. If the SB balloon cannot be delivered, never try to push
it into the stent forcibly either. When advancing a bal­loon across the stent into the SB, take great care as it often causes severe strut deformation if it becomes stuck. This is particularly the case with a stent having few (or no) links, which is prone to marked deformation. Use a balloon with a small soft tip for the SB.Considering the possible need for rewrapping, choose a balloon that is easy to rewrap. Anchoring is not recommended, or rather is contraindicated, for delivering a balloon into a stent with 0 to 2 links. Anchoring reinforces backup of the balloon and allows it to be pushed too strongly, inducing stent deformation.
5. If the tip of the SB balloon is blocked by a stent strut (the
distal balloon marker is far from the stent carina), you should inate the MB balloon to a high pressure. This will achieve better stent deployment and apposition, facilitating delivery of the balloon into the SB.If this method fails, check whether the balloon tip has become frayed (see (8)).
a
b
2.3 Optimal Stenting Techniques forBifurcation Lesions
187
6. If the tip of the SB balloon has crossed the stent struts, but its shoulder is blocked, you should inate the two balloons at a low pressure (about 6atm) by using the hugging balloon technique. After deating them, gently advance the SB balloon (Fig. 2.49), and it will often cross the stent struts. Several ination/deation cycles of the two hugging balloons may allow gradual advance­ment of the SB balloon.
7. Repeated dilatation of the proximal MB by a large­diameter balloon (POT) using the MB guidewire can facilitate delivery of the SB balloon.
8. If the tip of the SB balloon cannot cross the stent struts, withdraw the balloon and check whether its tip has become frayed (Fig.2.50). Fraying is often too small to identify by visual inspection. Continued use of a balloon with a frayed tip will worsen the fraying. Forcibly push­ing such a balloon forward will cause its tip to spread open, further exacerbating the difculty in achieving smooth advancement and increasing the risk of stent deformation (one reason that anchoring the balloon is contraindicated in bifurcation lesions). If fraying is identied, never reuse the balloon without cutting off the frayed tip (about 0.3mm) by using sharp scissors. This markedly improves deliverability of the balloon, although it removes part of the tapered tip, which sug­gests that fraying of the balloon catheter tip poses a major impediment to delivery across a stent. Although
Although the tip of a rotatable balloon catheter may be cut off obliquely, balloon catheters are generally dif­cult to rotate. Therefore, I always cut off the tip of the balloon catheter at right angles to its shaft.
9. If the balloon catheter still cannot cross the stent struts after its frayed tip has been cut off, exchange it for a new one.
10. If the new balloon catheter also cannot cross the stent, it is highly probable that the guidewire has not passed through an appropriate cell. While keeping the guide­wire in place, try SB rewiring with a second guidewire along a new route with the aid of a Crusade catheter. Then advance a balloon catheter along the second guidewire that has crossed the stent through a different cell to deliver it into the SB.If the rst guidewire actu­ally crossed the stent through an appropriate cell and the second guidewire has passed through the same cell (although this cannot be veried by coronary angiogra­phy), the buddy wire technique may be effective. Therefore, slowly advance the balloon catheter along the second guidewire. This technique may be more effective if the rst guidewire is pushed in slightly. If the buddy wire technique also fails (although it is rare), the last possibility is to deliver the smallest-diameter balloon into the SB.After dilating the cell by inating the balloon, it should be exchanged for a larger balloon.
cutting off the tip of a device is not ofcially recom­mended, I often do this to avoid using a new balloon catheter for reasons of medical economy.
A balloon catheter may become frayed at its tip while
In summary, when delivering a balloon into the SB, never push the balloon forward forcibly so as to prevent stent strut deformation and never use the anchor technique.
crossing stent struts, as well as when it is advanced through a CTO.As shown in Fig.2.50, I cut the balloon catheter tip at right angles, not obliquely to the shaft, for the reason explained in Fig.2.51. Although it might seem that a bal­loon catheter with an obliquely cut tip will be easier to advance, the resulting angle at the tip is usually oriented toward the larger curvature of the guidewire during advancement of the catheter (Fig.2.51a). Due to lack of support from the contralateral side, the leading edge of the cut tip tends to lift away from the guidewire, so the angled tip is more likely to get stuck on a stent strut and subse­quently become more severely frayed. Theoretically, a bal­loon catheter with an obliquely cut tip can easily cross a stent if it is advanced gently and is pulled back slightly and rotated at about 180 degrees before attempting readvance­ment after getting stuck (Fig.2.51b). However, it is uncer­tain whether a balloon catheter that has become stuck can actually be rotated appropriately in practice.
Fig. 2.48 Buddy wire technique (a) and buddy balloon technique (b).
(a) Introduction of a new guidewire changes the environment for the balloon tip and/or reduces friction between the balloon and the stent struts. (b) If the buddy wire technique fails, advance a new balloon with good deliverability over the buddy wire. This facilitates delivery of the second balloon
188
a
b
Tip of a balloon catheter
2 Stenting ofBifurcation Lesions
Fig. 2.49 Handling an SB
balloon that has failed to cross the MB stent (hugging balloon technique). (a) The SB balloon cannot cross the MB stent. (b) SB and MB balloons are inated at about 6atm using the hugging balloon technique. Ensure that the proximal marker of the MB balloon is located at the proximal edge of the stent, because dissection may occur in the proximal MB if the two balloons overlap outside the stent. (c) After both balloons are deated, the SB balloon can often readily cross the stent into the SB. (d) Performing KBI
a
b
a
c
b
d
Stent strut
Guidewire
Fig. 2.50 Countermeasures for a frayed balloon tip. (a) The tip of a
balloon catheter has become frayed and deformed. (b) The frayed tip (about 0.3mm) has been cut off a balloon catheter, so it has lost its tapered end compared with an intact catheter (c). (c) The tip end of a new balloon catheter that has been chamfered modestly. (d) Using Cooper scissors to cut off the tip of a balloon catheter
c
d
Fig. 2.51 Balloon catheter with the tip cut obliquely. If the angle at the
balloon tip is oriented toward the lateral side (larger curvature) of the guidewire during advancement of the balloon, the leading edge is more likely to get stuck on a stent strut and become severely frayed (a). A balloon catheter with an obliquely cut tip should be advanced gently. If it becomes stuck, it should be pulled back slightly and rotated about 180 degrees before attempting readvancement (b). In practice, a balloon catheter often cannot be rotated appropriately
ab
2.3 Optimal Stenting Techniques forBifurcation Lesions
Column 16 Balloon Rewrapping
To reduce resistance to the irregular surface of a rewrapped balloon, you should minimize irregularity by using the protective sheath to cover the balloon as follows. Insert the stylet introducer for the sheath into the balloon catheter from its tip under negative pressure, and slide the sheath over the balloon from the tip to reduce its prole. Rotate the sheath while sliding it over the balloon to prevent balloon deformation and to facilitate coverage with the sheath
Column 17 Importance of the Correct Fluoroscopy Angle
When conrming the position of the tip of the SB balloon, it is important to use a projection that allows en face obser­vation of the bifurcation. For example, the LAD-Dg bifurcation must be viewed in the LAO cranial projection, and not in the RAO cranial projection. As shown in Fig.2.52, the distal marker of the balloon appears to be well past the carina in the LAO cranial view but is only just beyond the carina in the RAO cranial view. It is very important to decide whether or not the balloon tip has passed the carina because this determines the subsequent procedures.
189
Fig. 2.52 Views obtained in different projections. The distal marker of the balloon appears to be well past
the carina in the LAO cranial view (a) but is only just beyond the carina in the RAO cranial view (b)