Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3585_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
102 Мб
Скачать
g
4.3 Lesion Preparation
Column 21 Selection of the Lacrosse NSE, AngioSculpt, and ScoreFlex° balloons (Fig.4.12a–c)
I prefer the Lacrosse NSE balloon. It appears to me that IVUS shows better cracking of calcied plaques after ination
of the Lacrosse NSE balloon than the AngioSculpt balloon and there may be a good reason for this.
The scoring elements of these two balloons have different structures. The Lacrosse NSE balloon induces cracks in the longitudinal direction, while the AngioSculpt balloon induces cracks in both the longitudinal direction and obliquely (in the radial direction at points of inection). Ination of these balloons enlarges the cracks in calcied plaque, thereby increasing the luminal surface area in the radial direction and leading to dilation of the target vessel. Radial cracks can hardly contribute to dilation of the vessel in the radial direction, while cracks with both radial and longitudinal components will contribute to dilation with oblique distortion. Thus, it is clear that the Lacrosse NSE balloon will be more effective in achieving radial dilation of vessels because the scoring elements of this balloon are aligned parallel to its longitudinal axis.
In addition, both the AngioSculpt and ScoreFlex balloons have relatively ne metal cutting elements, while the Lacrosse NSE balloon had high plastic wedges as its cutting elements. These characteristic cutting elements of the Lacrosse NSE allow it to deform the vessel wall more extensively and crack plaques better during ination. If the calcied plaque is eccentric, the plastic cutting elements are less likely to injure the relatively soft vessel wall on the opposite side.
221
Fig. 4.12 Comparison of
scoring/cutting balloons. (a)
Lacrosse NSE ALPHA
scoring balloon. (b)
AngioSculpt scoring balloon.
(c) FlexTome cutting balloon
a
Inflation
b
A cutting balloon with a workin
height of 0.005 inches.
0.005’
c
222
4 Stenting ofLeft Main Coronary Artery (LM) Lesions
4.3.3 Preparing theLAD/LCX Ostia andtheProximal LAD/LCX
Despite the smaller diameter of the LAD or LCX compared with the LM, a 3.5-mm stent is usually employed for crossover stenting from the LM to the LAD or LCX across the ostium of the other branch. If the LAD or LCX has a smaller diameter than 3.5mm, the radial strength of the stent will be reduced. Accordingly, the region from the LAD/LCX ostium to the
Severe calcification
Rotablator
Moderate calcification Mild-trivial calcification
proximal LAD/LCX should be prepared with particular care to minimize vascular recoil. If there is any calcied plaque, scor­ing balloon angioplasty should be performed for pre-dilatation.
4.3.4 Practical Approach toPreparation
Figure 4.13 shows the algorithm used at my center when pre­paring LM bifurcation lesions for stenting.
pre-treatment
scoring balloon
HPB (high pressure balloon)
inadequate
debulking
scoring
balloon
Fig. 4.13 Preparation of LM bifurcation lesions for stenting at my center
adequate
debulking
HPB
• High-pressure inflation of a slightly undersized scoring balloon
• KBI with Lacrosse NSE balloons inflated at about 8 atm
Stent implantation after reassessment by IVUS
4.3 Lesion Preparation
223
Before preparing an LM bifurcation lesion, I perform IVUS to estimate the vessel size, the extent of calcication, and the properties of the plaques. The approach to prepara­tion of such lesions is stratied according to the extent of calcication.
Fig. 4.14 LM bifurcation
lesion with eccentric calcication. IVUS showed eccentric calcication in both the LAD and the LCX
LM LAD os LAD
4.3.4.1 Preparing aBifurcation Lesion withEccentric Calcication
Figure 4.14 shows an LM bifurcation lesion with markedly eccentric calcication on IVUS. Alternating high-pressure ination was performed rst, followed by simultaneous ination (8atm) of two 3.25-mm Lacrosse NSE balloons in the LM-LCX and LM-LAD, achieving dilation of the calci­ed region at the bifurcation (Fig.4.15).
LCX os
LCX
224
4 Stenting ofLeft Main Coronary Artery (LM) Lesions
Fig. 4.15 Preparation of the
lesion shown in Fig. LAD and LCX were pre-dilated by alternating high-pressure ination, followed by KBI with slightly undersized Lacrosse NSE balloons
4.14. The
LCX : Lacrosse NSE 3.25×13 mm 18 atm
LMT bifurcation
LAD : Lacrosse NSE 3.25×13 mm 16 atm
LCX
KBI : Lacrosse NSE 3.25×13 mm 8 atm
LAD
4.3.4.2 Preparing aSeverely Calcied Bifurcation Lesion
Figures 4.16 and 4.17 show an LM bifurcation lesion in a dialysis patient with severe calcication in the LM-LAD and also in the LCX that prevented delivery of the IVUS catheter into the LAD.
Rotablation was performed with a 1.75-mm burr and then a 2.25-mm burr in the LAD, while a 2.25-mm burr was used in the LCX.Then both the LAD and LCX were dilated with a
4.0mm cutting balloon. Subsequently, simultaneous ination of 4.0mm and 3.75mm balloons in the LAD and LCX, respec­tively, achieved adequate preparation of the lesion for stenting.
LAD os
LM LCX
Fig. 4.16 LM bifurcation lesion in a dialysis patient. IVUS showed
severe calcication in both the LAD and LCX
4.3 Lesion Preparation
225
Fig. 4.17 Preparation of the
lesion presented in Fig.
4.16.
Rotablation with a 2.25-mm burr was followed by ination of a 4.0-mm cutting balloon. Subsequently, simultaneous ination of 4.0mm (LAD) and 3.75mm (LCX) balloons induced cracks in the calcied lesion, resulting in adequate preparation for optimal stent deployment
LAD : Rota 1.75mm
LAD : Rota 2.25mm
LAD, LCX : Cutting balloon 4.0 mm
LCX : Rota 2.25mm
KBI : LAD 4.0mm, LCX 3.75mm
LM bifurcation
LAD os
LCX os
226
4 Stenting ofLeft Main Coronary Artery (LM) Lesions
4.4 Stenting Strategy andProcedure
Stent implantation should only be done after adequate lesion preparation. Stenting should generally be provisional and should be performed on the basis of the following concepts and according to the following procedures.
4.4.1 Stenting aRelatively Long LM
withPlaque Conned totheOstium or Part oftheTrunk (See Fig.4.2a andc)
You should implant a two-link DES so that its distal edge is within the LMT. If the LM has a diameter > 3.5 mm and there are no calcied plaques so the vessel will only show modest recoil, pre-dilatation should be completed by inating a balloon with a diameter of about 3.5mm. If the lesion is pre-dilated to a diameter greater than 3.5mm, a stent implanted by using a 3.5-mm SDB will show malap­position and will be likely to migrate immediately after implantation.
After a stent has been implanted, it may migrate or be deformed during withdrawal of the SDB or advancement of a post-dilatation balloon. To avoid this, the stent should be deployed to a diameter of 3.5 mm in order to create mild vascular recoil, since this will ensure that the stent becomes xed and does not migrate from the landing zone.
If a 4mm DES with 0 to 2 links is approved for use in the future, it should be used for the above procedures instead of a 3.5-mm DES.
Stenting with KBI can only achieve favorable outcomes if the following requirements are met: (1) use of an optimally designed stent; (2) optimal guidewire routes; and (3) avoid­ance of stent deformation during balloon delivery.
If KBI is performed after implanting a two-link stent (e.g., a Cypher stent), it can actually lead to a worse outcome in many cases due to the stent design. Post-stenting KBI may also enhance jailing of the SB by a three-link stent. In con­trast, post-stenting KBI is less likely to induce SB jailing and vascular stress if a two-link stent is used.
Stenting with KBI, especially at the LM bifurcation, should only be performed if the following requirements are met. First and most importantly, an optimally designed stent is needed. Second, the SB guidewire should cross the stent through the most distal cell at the carina and come into con­tact with the carina. After post-stenting KBI, you must check whether the SB guidewire has followed an appropriate route. Third, POT prior to SB wiring has recently become the stan­dard intervention for preventing stent deformation. Fourth, if the SB balloon becomes blocked by a stent strut, it should not be advanced forcibly and must be delivered by a non­pushing technique (see Chap. 2). The anchor technique, in which an anchoring balloon is used to provide support for advancing the balloon, must not be employed.
I think that stenting with KBI is useful if it is performed appropriately when these requirements are met. It is doubt­ful whether previous studies that have found negative results for post-stenting KBI actually compared outcomes after KBI was performed with these requirements versus outcomes after stenting alone.
4.4.2 Stenting theLM Bifurcation
In general, provisional stenting should be performed at the LM bifurcation, but a planned two-stent technique may be employed.
4.4.2.1 Stenting withKBI
Need forPost-stenting KBI
I think that stenting with KBI is the basic method of LM bifurcation stenting. This strategy is adopted for the follow­ing reasons: (1) to achieve optimal stent apposition, (2) to achieve sufcient dilation of the vessels around the carina to their normal diameters, and (3) to ensure good accessibil­ity of the LCX if PCI needs to be performed in the future. Crossover stenting may sometimes be performed across the LCX ostium without post-stenting KBI, but is limited to cases where the LCX has a very small diameter and perfuses a very small territory of the left ventricle.
Practical Stenting with KBI
Crossover stenting is performed from the proximal MB to the distal MB or to the SB across the ostium of the other branch. In comparison with the proximal MB, the distal MB and the SB often have much smaller diameters. If the MB (LM) has a large diameter, a Nobori 3.5-mm JV stent needs to be implanted, even if the landing zone will be located in the distal MB (LAD) with a smaller diameter (about
3.0 mm). Because a Nobori 3.5-mm JV stent is usually deployed by inating the SDB at 4.0atm, the stent should be implanted by initial ination at 4 to 5atm. Subsequently, the SDB should be pulled back until its distal marker is at the carina and then inated at a higher pressure of up to about 14atm (Fig.4.18).
The SDB should be withdrawn slowly so as to prevent the guiding catheter from becoming deeply engaged at the LM ostium and its tip from deforming a stent strut (Fig.4.19). If the guiding catheter appears to spontaneously enter the LM ostium, you may need to pull it back slightly in order to pre­vent catheter advancement while withdrawing the SDB.
4.4 Stenting Strategy andProcedure
227
Note that pulling the guiding catheter back too far when attempting to prevent its advancement may result in loss of coaxiality with the LM (or the stent) after withdrawal of the SDB, which may prevent delivery of a post-dilatation (POT) balloon. If an attempt to regain coaxiality of the guiding catheter with the LM is made at this time, the tip of the guid­ing catheter often causes deformation of the proximal edge of the unapposed stent. Thus, it is important not to pull the catheter back excessively, and if the guiding catheter loses coaxiality with the LM, you should try to regain a coaxial position carefully without deforming the proximal edge of the stent.
In some cases, you can deliver a medium-sized balloon for pre-dilatation rst and then move the guiding catheter to and fro or rotate it along the balloon catheter to regain coaxi­ality with the LM while avoiding stent deformation.
After withdrawing the SDB, you should immediately per­form POT using a balloon that matches the diameter of the LM ostium. A new balloon should generally be used, but if the pre-dilatation balloon is reused, it should be reformed before introduction into the guiding catheter or rewrapped in the guiding catheter by ination at about 10atm before delivery into the stent. The POT balloon should be inated at 14atm inside the stent. In the presence of a jailed guidewire, the POT balloon should not be inated at a pressure exceed­ing 14atm to avoid trapping the guidewire. If symptoms and the hemodynamic prole permit, the POT balloon should be inated at a rate of about 1atm per second to prevent it from slipping out of the stent.
POT is often difcult to perform if the LM is less than 8mm in length. In particular, when the LM ostium is tapered, the POT balloon and the stent are very likely to slip out of the ostium. As stent slippage toward the sinus of Valsalva may
lead to excessive expansion of some of the stent struts, there is no use performing POT (Fig.4.20).
If the LM is short (especially if it is tapered), it is better not to try POT and just perform KBI with great care. Since KBI can correct tapering of the LM to some extent, high- pressure POT can reliably dilate the LM after KBI (Fig.4.21). In any case, bifurcation stenting should be accomplished by nal KBI.
Subsequently, SB rewiring should be performed via the Crusade catheter according to the procedure described in Chap. 2 (see pages 155 to 157). Since the LM branches (LAD and LCX) do not lie in a single plane, it may be difcult to use CAG to determine whether the SB guidewire has crossed the stent through the most distal cell at the carina. In general, the LM bifurcation can be seen most clearly in a steep spider view, but this view does not always provide en face observa­tion of the bifurcation. Since it is very hard to conrm the correctness of the guidewire route without an en face view of the bifurcation, you should perform provisional KBI.
Nonetheless, it is necessary to minimize SB jailing at the LM bifurcation. If severe SB jailing persists and culotte stenting has to be performed subsequently, you may have dif­culty delivering a stent into the SB across the MB stent or may cause deformation of the MB stent. Since these events must particularly be avoided in LM bifurcation stenting, you should perform IVUS immediately after KBI to assess the extent of SB jailing. If necessary, you should attempt SB rewiring through the most distal cell of the MB stent at the carina and then repeat KBI (see Chap. 2 [pages 168 to 171]).
Before performing KBI, you need to withdraw the guide­wire that has been jailed by the SB guidewire. For tips about withdrawing a jailed guidewire, please also refer to Chap.
2 (page 183). While withdrawing the jailed guidewire, you
should take great care to prevent stent deformation.
abc
Fig. 4.18 Bifurcation stenting with a large-diameter proximal MB
(LM) and small-diameter distal MB/SB. (a) Baseline CAG. (b) A Nobori 3.5-mm JV stent was implanted from the LM to the proximal
LAD (Segment 6) with low-pressure (5atm) expansion. (c) The SDB was pulled back to the LM trunk and inated at a high pressure (16atm)
228
Fig. 4.19 Deformation of a stent implanted at the LM ostium. During
withdrawal of the SDB, the guiding catheter may be advanced into the LM ostium, deforming the stent
4 Stenting ofLeft Main Coronary Artery (LM) Lesions
Fig. 4.20 Precautions when performing POT. As a result of the POT
balloon slipping out of the ostium, the stent implanted in the LM has been deformed with overexpansion of its struts
a
b
c
Fig. 4.21 Technique for performing POT and KBI in a short (tapered) LM.It is sometimes better to perform KBI rst (a & b) and then POT (c).
In any case, bifurcation stenting should be accomplished by nal KBI (d)
d
ab
4.4 Stenting Strategy andProcedure
229
4.4.3 Stenting uptotheOstium
If IVUS shows some plaque in the LMT, stenting should be performed up to the ostium to avoid positioning the stent edges in the trunk. If the LM is not too long for a stent 28 mm in length to easily cover the entire LM from its ostium to the LAD ostium, the LM should be stented up to the ostium even if the plaque burden is trivial.
To locate the proximal edge of a stent just at the ostium, it is generally recommended to position it at the end of the shoulders of the LM ostium in the AP cranial view (Fig.4.22). However, it is sometimes impossible to distinguish the shoulders from the trunk on CAG, even after ne adjustment of the uoroscopy angle. In such cases, you should introduce an IVUS catheter along the guidewire inserted into the LCX
and use IVUS to locate the proximal edge of the stent and the LM ostium. Subsequently, you can adjust the position of the stent so that its proximal edge overlaps the LM ostium by advancing and withdrawing it repeatedly. When the proxi­mal edge of the stent has been positioned to overlap the LM ostium, you should perform non-contrast CAG.While con­rming that the stent remains in position, you should slowly withdraw the IVUS catheter, leaving only guidewires in the LM, and should then implant the stent. To prevent migration of the stent together with the IVUS probe, the LM should be pre-dilated to enlarge it enough to easily accommodate these devices.
This contrast-free method for accurately positioning a stent is very helpful for LM stenting in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Fig. 4.22 Conrming the position of the stent edge. (a) AP and cranial
30° projection. (b) LAO 50° and caudal 29° projection. The AP cranial projection allows visualization of the LM ostium (red arrow). The stent
should be implanted so that its proximal edge protrudes from the ostium. While the LAO caudal projection displays the LM bifurcation, it is not suitable for identifying the LM ostium
230
4.4.4 Stent Edge intheLMT
4 Stenting ofLeft Main Coronary Artery (LM) Lesions
If the LM is too long to achieve complete coverage from its ostium to the LAD ostium with a 28-mm stent, you will need to choose between fully covering the LM or placing the stent edge in the LMT. If there is a signicant plaque bur­den, chronic progression of stenosis at the proximal edge of a stent frequently occurs after stenting of other coronary arter­ies and similar outcomes are expected in the LM.Despite the lack of denite evidence, I think it is acceptable to implant the stent with its edge in the LMT if the LM is relatively long and has a relative plaque area of about 30%. If the LM is 10 mm long, it should be stented completely from its ostium to the LAD ostium.
4.4.5 Culotte Stenting
4.4.5.1 Indications forCulotte Stenting
If provisional MB stenting with KBI leads to compromise of the SB, a second stent has to be implanted in the SB.There are two options for such two stenting, which are T stenting and culotte stenting. At the LM bifurcation, I often prefer culotte stenting for the following three reasons:
1. With T stenting, the proximal edge of the SB stent inevi­tably protrudes into the MB lumen and shows malapposi­tion to the MB/SB wall.
2. With T stenting, the stent struts at the shoulders of the bifurcation receive no support from the contralateral wall and lose radial strength. In contrast, culotte stenting cre­ates a double layer of struts at the bifurcation shoulders supported by the lateral wall of the proximal MB, thus leading to a twofold increase of radial strength (Fig.4.23).
3. Culotte stenting is less complicated than T stenting. The only additional procedures required are SB rewiring and repeated POT plus KBI.
a
b
c
Fig. 4.23 T stenting versus culotte stenting. (a) Provisional T stenting.
(b) Modied T stenting. (c) Culotte stenting. With provisional or modi­ed T stenting, the stent struts may lose radial strength on the contralat­eral side