Конфликтный дискурс. Социолингвистический и прагмалингвистический аспекты. Монография
.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Конфликтный дискурс |
|||
|
|
|||||||||
117Chouliaraki. |
L.,FaircloughN.DiscourseinLateModernity: |
|||||||||
Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. – Edinburgh: University |
||||||||||
of Edinburgh Press, 1999. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
118. |
Couper-Kuhlen E., Selting M. Studies in Interactional |
|||||||||
Linguistics. – Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 2001. |
|
|
|
|||||||
119. |
Dahrendorf R. Der Moderne Soziale konflikt. – Berlin, |
|||||||||
1992. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120. Delanty G., Jones P. R., Wodak R. (eds) (in press) Voices |
||||||||||
of Migrants. – Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. |
|
|
||||||||
121. |
Deutsch M. The resolution of Conflict: Constructive and |
|||||||||
destructive processes. – Yale University Press, 1973. |
|
|
||||||||
122. |
Diamond J. Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: a |
|||||||||
Study of Discourse in a Close-knit Social Network. – Amsterdam; |
||||||||||
Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co., 1996. – 178 p. |
|
|||||||||
123. |
Dieckmann |
W. |
Politische |
Sprache, |
|
politische |
||||
Kommunikation: Vortrage, Aufsatze, Entwurfe. – Heidelberg: |
||||||||||
Winter, 1981. – 279 s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
124. |
Dijk T. A. van. Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. – |
|||||||||
The Hague: Mouton, 1981. – 331 p. |
|
|
|
Cognitive |
||||||
125. |
Dirven R., Polzenhagen F., Wolf H.-G. |
|||||||||
Linguistics, |
Ideology and |
Critical |
Discourse |
Analysis |
// |
|||||
D. Geeraerts and H. Myckens (eds) / Handbook of Cognitive |
||||||||||
Linguistics. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 (in |
||||||||||
press). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.DurantiA.Agencyinlanguage//Acompaniontolinguistic |
||||||||||
anthropology – Blackwell Publishing, 2006. – p. 451–474. |
|
|||||||||
127. |
Ehlich K. Kooperation und sprachliches Handeln // |
|||||||||
Liedtke F., Keller R. Kommunikation und Kooperation. – |
||||||||||
Tübingen etc., 1987. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
128. Fairclough N. Language and Power. – London: Longman, |
||||||||||
1989. – 259 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129. |
Fairclough N., Wodak R. Critical Discourse Analysis // |
|||||||||
Discourse Studies / T. A. van Dijk (ed.). – London: Sage, 1997. – |
||||||||||
Vol. II. |
Fowler R. Language as social practice // Handbook of |
|||||||||
130. |
||||||||||
Discourse Analysis. Vol. 4. – London, 1985. – P. 61–83. |
|
|||||||||
131. |
Giddens A. Sociology. – London: Polity, 2000. |
|
|
|||||||
132. |
Habermas J. |
The Theory of Communicative Action. – |
||||||||
Vol. 1. – London: Heinemann, 1984. – 465 p. |
|
|
|
|||||||
133. |
Hawkins |
B. |
Ideology, Metaphor and Iconographic |
|||||||
Reference // Language and Ideology / R. Dirven, R. Frank, C. Ilie |
||||||||||
(eds). – Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2001. – Vol. II. |
|
|
as |
|||||||
134. |
Hodge |
|
R., |
Kress |
G. |
Language |
||||
Ideology. – |
New |
York: |
Routledge, |
1993. |
– |
230 |
p. |
|||
91
М.Ю. Сейранян
135.Horn L. Pragmatic Theory // Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.). – Vol. 1. – Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
136.HymesD.Discourse:ScopewithoutDepth//International Journal of the Sociology of Language 57. – 1986. – P. 49–89.
137.Kotthoff H. Disagreement and concession in disputes: on the context sensitivity of preference structures // Cambridge journal. – 1993. – № 22. – P. 193–216.
138.Kramarae C., Shultz M., O’Barr W. M. Introduction: Toward an understanding of language and power // Language and Power. C. Kramarae et al. (Eds.). – Beverly Hills: Sage, 1984. – P. 9–22.
139.Kristeva J. Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art / Ed. Leon Roundier. – New York: Columbia UP, 1980.
140.Kunda Z. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
141.LakoffG.Don’tThinkofanElephant!–Berkeley:Chelsea Green, 2004.
142.Lemke J. L. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. – London: Taylor & Francis, 1995.
143.Layder D. Social and personal Identity. – London, 2004.
144.Levinson S. C. Pragmatics. – Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press., 1983. – 420 p.
145.Local J. Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents // Journal of Phonetics. Vol. 31. – 2003.
146.Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme: Grundrisse einer allgemeinen Theorie. – Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp, 1984.
147.Malinovski B. The Problem of Meaning in Primitive languages // The meaning of Meaning. C.K.Ogden, J.A.Richards.– London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972. – P. 296–336.
148.Mayer R. J. Conflict management – Columbus: Battelle Institute, 1995.
149.Parret H. Semiotics and pragmatics. An evaluative comparison of conceptual frameworks. – Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 1983.
150.Pavlidou T. Cooperation and the choice of linguistic means: Some evidence from the use of the subjunctive in Modern Greek // Journal of Pragmatics. – 1991/15.
151.Reisigl M., Wodak R. Discourse and Discrimination. – London: Routledge, 2001.
152.Schank R. C., Abelson R. P. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. – Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.
92
Конфликтный дискурс
153.Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance, Communication and Cognition. – Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
154.Tannen D. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. – New Jersey etc., 1994.
155.Tannen D. Remarks on Discourse and Power // Power Through Discourse. – Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1987. – P. 3–10.
156.Weiss G., Wodak R. Theory and Interdisciplinarity in Critical Discourse Analysis. An Introduction // Theory and Interdisciplinarity in Critical Discourse Analysis / G. Weiss and R. Wodak (eds). – London: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2003.
157.Wichmann A. Intonation in text and discourse. – Pearson Education Limited, 2000.
158.Wilson J. Politically Speaking: the Pragmatic Analyses of Political Language. – Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1990. – 203 p.
159.Wodak R. Critical Discourse Analysis // Qualitative ResearchPractice/C.Seale,G.Gobo,J.F.Gubrium,D.Silverman (eds). – London: Sage, 2004a.
160.Wodak R. Discourses of Silence // Discourse and Silencing / L. Thiesmeyer (ed.). – Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2004b.
161.Wodak R. What CDA is About: A Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments // Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis / R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds). London: Sage, 2001.
162.Wodak R., Meyer M. (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. – London: Sage, 2001.
93
ДЛЯ ЗАМЕТОК
ДЛЯ ЗАМЕТОК
Маргарита Юрьевна Сейранян
КОНФЛИКТНЫЙ ДИСКУРС: СОЦИОЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИЙ И ПРАГМАЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИЙ АСПЕКТЫ
Монография
Издательство «Прометей» 129164 Москва, ул. Кибальчича, д. 6, стр. 2
Тел.: (499) 730-38-61 E-mail: info@prometej.su
Подписано в печать 24.02.2012 г. Формат 60х90/16. Объем 6 п.л. Тираж 500 экз. Заказ № 210.
