Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Philosophy_textbook.docx
Скачиваний:
7
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
963.04 Кб
Скачать

1.4. Philosophy as General Methodology

Methods originate in practical activity as generalized devices that conform to the properties and laws of reality, with the objective logic of the things at the transformation of which human activity is directed. The methods of practical activity thus reflect the historically formed and socially consolidated modes of man’s sensuously objective interaction with the world. This was the basis for the formation of cognitive and later theoretical methods – sets of devices and operations directing the mind towards the path leading to the truth. Philosophy is a universal method, its subject matter being the most universal principles of thought of all cognition. Philosophical methods do not determine unambiguously the course of the creative search for the truth. In the final analysis the decisive factor here is practical life. The universal methods of philosophy are the necessary condition for the solution of various concrete tasks; they do not replace the special scientific methods – rather they are given a concrete form in these methods. Philosophical methods are devices for the study of objects with the aim of discovering in them the universal laws of movement and development manifested in specific ways in accordance with the specificity of the object.

Methodology is a system of basic principles or elements of generalized modes of the organization and construction of theoretical and practical activity. It is a particular area of philosophical knowledge.

The main philosophical methods are dialectics, metaphysics, phenomenology, hermeneutics and others.

“Dialectics” from Greek means a dispute, contradiction. In philosophy the term “dialectics” was first applied by Socrates. For him dialectics was an effective method of proceeding over a dispute aimed at revealing the truth through the collision of opposite points of view. German philosopher G. Hegel developed dialectics as a method of searching for the existence of opposite sides in things and of contradictions between them in reality itself. However under reality he meant only a thought. Later K. Marx and F. Engels stated, that G. Hegel' geniously guessed dialectics of things in dialectics of ideas and concepts. They regarded dialectics as a theory of the most general regularities of the development of nature, society and human thought which is expressed in the system of categories and laws.

Dialectics is the method, by which we study development in its most complete deep-going and comprehensive form. Dialectics affords a reflection of the extremely complex and contradictory processes of the material and spiritual world. Dialectics is not a mere statement of that, which happens in the reality but an instrument of scientific cognition and transformation, an instrument for moving from the domain of non-knowledge into the realm of knowledge, a methodology of knowledge based on action and methodology of action based on knowledge. It is in this that the unity of dialectics as theory and method is manifested.

Metaphysics is characterized by the static mode of thinking, by the veering of thought from one extreme to the other by exaggeration of some aspect of an object, such as stability, repetition and relative independence. A characteristic feature of metaphysics has always been one-sidedness, abstractness and the lifting of certain elements to an absolute. Things and their mental reflection are always unchanging, immobile, and identical to themselves for the metaphysical way of thinking. Metaphysics does not cover universal connections between things and phenomena, does not examine their mutual conditionality. Metaphysical thought regards motion only as a simple transition of things in space which takes place either on a circle or on a straight line. As a method of scientific cognition metaphysics played an important role in the development of classic natural science in the XVII-XVIII centuries. However, this method is not appropriate for philosophical generalizations.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]