Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
alexander_w_r_mckinley_l_eds_deep_geological_disposal_of_rad.pdf
Скачиваний:
5
Добавлен:
19.11.2019
Размер:
8.35 Mб
Скачать

220

A. Hooper

another ancient uranium deposit (1300 million years) that has remained in place by virtue of a clay halo; this is despite the presence of an active (but reducing) groundwater flow system. In contrast, one of the 1800 million year old uranium deposits at Alligator Rivers (Australia) sits in the partially saturated zone a few tens of metres below the surface. The deposit has undergone weathering and alteration over the past 1–3 million years. Interactions with oxidising groundwater and rainwater infiltration have led to uranium migration, precipitation and secondary mineralisation in a dispersion halo up to 80 m distant from the primary ore body. Study of this site has enabled testing of radionuclide transport models of relevance to a shallow repository or the Yucca Mountain site.

Many other natural analogues, e.g., Poc˛os de Caldas, Needle’s Eye, Broubster, Tono Mine, El Berrocal and Palmottu, offer insights into radionuclide (especially uranium) transport and retardation under different geosphere conditions. Information on the solubility of naturally occurring radionuclides and other trace elements in groundwaters that have been in contact with uranium-bearing minerals can be used to test the robustness of equilibrium thermodynamic models and databases that provide the basis for the relevant safety assessment models of radionuclide migration. Through formalised model testing (see Pate et al. (1994), for details), it has been shown that incorrect assumptions have been made concerning the nature and properties of the mineral phase that controls solubility, resulting in the need to carry out research to characterise the relevant phase and determine its thermodynamic properties. Where the analogue allows the tracing of the migration of a radionuclide over geological timescales, it additionally allows testing of coupled transport and reaction models, where there is typically a requirement to conduct laboratory-scale research into the kinetics of surface reactions. Although permanent retention of radionuclides in the geosphere is not a feature of SA modelling, an understanding that such processes will occur over relevant timescales under defined conditions can provide a complementary line of evidence in a repository safety case.

8.6. Model and database development

All models begin with conceptualisation – the basic understanding on which a model is constructed. For the conceptualisation to yield quantitative information, the conceptual model must first be expressed mathematically. Mathematical models come in many forms: some may be so simple as to be almost trivial, others may require complex numerical routines and associated software. In any event, the mathematical model must be populated with data. These three needs: understanding (i.e., conceptualisation), data and models are the principal R&D requirements of any SA.

A useful distinction can be made between the detailed models used in the underlying research (‘‘research models’’) and system (or process) models that calculate the behaviour of the total system, or a part of it. Research models cover a wide range of complexity and uncertainty. At one extreme they may employ standard approaches with fundamental data; at the other they can be semi-quantitative explanations of difficult- to-reproduce phenomena. An example of the first type is calculation of the radionuclide inventory of SF. An example of the second is the thermo-hydro-chemo-mechanical models of changes when the bentonite buffer around a waste container interacts with groundwater.

Research and development infrastructure

221

System models draw on the research models for data and, often, a simplified conceptualisation that is necessary to make the mathematics tractable or else calculable within ordinary computing constraints – this is known as data abstraction. An example of a system model is the solubility/sorption limitation model described earlier. This makes a number of simplifying assumptions. Amongst these are two assumptions that relate to the chemistry of radionuclides in solution; namely that, under the conditions that prevail in a repository, (i) the solubility of a radionuclide can be expressed by a single number and (ii) sorption of a radionuclide on a near-field material (e.g., the buffer) can be expressed in terms of a single-valued coefficient that expresses the ratio of the concentration of radionuclide attached to the solid, to the concentration of radionuclide in solution (i.e., Kd-values). It falls to the research models to demonstrate that, if these assumptions are not strictly true, they are, at least, fit for purpose.

Given the large investments in R&D in the past 30 years, it is no surprise that many computer programs and databases now exist. Some are proprietary, of course, but there are many others that have been made available to the public, sometimes through an intermediary such as an international or government agency. The NEA-OECD list alone runs to several hundred items. Other agencies such as IAEA and the major US government laboratories have similar long lists. Some of the older data compilations appear in published books or on websites. Open access encourages wider use of the various models and databases and raises confidence in their applicability by exposing them to broad-based criticism so that any obvious flaws can be corrected and improvements can be suggested.

8.7. Conclusions

The information in this chapter illustrates that:

A detailed scientific understanding has been developed of the processes most relevant to the design, performance and long-term safety of geological repositories. As noted in Chapter 3, this is based on over five decades of work in materials science, chemistry, earth sciences and many more specialist disciplines.

A range of possibilities exist for design and construction of engineered barriers to complement both the geological barriers and the different types of radioactive waste. A sound and practical understanding has been developed of the properties of the relevant materials with respect to their fabrication and performance in a repository environment.

The accumulated scientific knowledge is sufficient to understand the long-term containment and migration of radionuclides in the engineered barriers and geosphere. Although uncertainties will always be present, these can be bounded sufficiently to be able to estimate the long-term performance of a repository system through quantitative models. Confidence in the results from these performance calculations is supported by evidence from natural analogues and long-term experiments in underground research facilities.

Almost all of the above knowledge and experience has been gained in open scientific and technical programmes and much of it has come from multinational collaborative programmes. This openness and collaboration allows for efficient dissemination of ideas and results, healthy discussion and critical peer review.

222

A. Hooper

Finally, it is also clear that we do not know everything: several areas requiring further R&D exist (and some have been pointed out here) and will be examined in the coming years to ensure that radwaste can be safely disposed of in deep geological repositories.

8.8. References

Alder, J.C. and McGinnes, D. (1994). Model radioactive waste inventory for swiss waste disposal. Nagra Technical Report 93-21, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

Alexander, W.R. (1995). Natural cements: How can they help us safely dispose of radioactive waste? Radwaste Magazine 2, Sept. 1995, 61–69.

Alexander, W.R., McKinley, I.G. (1999). The chemical basis of near-field containment in the Swiss high-level radioactive waste disposal concept. In: Chemical containment of wastes in the geosphere, Metcalfe, R., Rochelle, C.A. (Eds.), Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 157, Geological Society, London, UK, 47–69.

Alexander, W.R., Giere´, R., Hidaka, H., Yoshida, H. (2006). Natural immobilisation processes aid the understanding long-term evolution of deep geological radioactive waste repositories. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 6, 3–4.

Andra (2004). Radioactive waste and recoverable material in France: summary of the National Inventory. available online at www.andra.fr/radioactive_waste/nuclear_engineering.htm.

Angus, M., Tyson, A. (2002). Combined waste equilibrium leach tests, AEA Technology Report for Nirex AEAT/R/ENV/0235, AEA, Harwell, UK.

Angus, N.S., Brown, G.T., Cleere, C.F. (1962). The Iron Nails from the Roman Legionary Fortress at Inchtuthil, Perthshire. Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, November 1962, 956–968.

Atkinson, A., Boult, D.J., Hearne, J.A. (1986). An assessment of the long-term durability of concrete in radioactive waste environments. Sci. Basis Nucl. Waste Manag. IX, 239–246.

Bailey, M.J. (1986). Utilisation of glucoisosaccharinic acid by bacterial isolates unable to utilise glucose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, (6), 493–498.

Bailey, M.J. (1987). A Comparison of Bacterial Strains Growing on Glucoisosaccharinic Acid. In: Wood Cellulose, Kennedy, J.F., Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A. (Eds.), Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, pp 331–337.

Bastiaens, W., Demarche, M. (2003). The extension of the URF Hades: Realization and observations, Waste Management ’03, Feb 23–27 2003, Tucson, AZ, Waste Management Symposia, Inc. (CD ROM publication).

Baston, G.M.N., Brownsword, M., Smith, A.J., Smith-Briggs, J.L. (2003). Further near-field solubility studies 1989–92, Nirex Report NSS/R357, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

Baston, G.M.N., Berry, J.E., Brownsword, M. (2003). Effect of Sorption Kinetics. Section 3.4. In: Alexander, W.R., Ota, K., Frieg, B. (Eds.), The Nagra-JNC in situ study of safety relevant radionuclide retardation in fractured crystalline rock II: the RRP project methodology development, field and laboratory tests. Nagra Technical Report Series NTB 00-06, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

Bath, A.H., Christofi, N., Neal, C., Philp, J.C., Cave, M.R., McKinley, I.G., Berner, U. (1988). Trace element and microbiological studies of alkaline groundwaters in Oman, Arabian Gulf: A natural analogue for cement pore waters, Nagra Technical Report NTB 87-16, Nagra, Baden, Switzerland.

Boulton, G.S., Zatsephin, S., Maillot, B. (2001). Analysis of Groundwater Flow Beneath Ice Sheets, SKB Technical Report TR-01-06, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bradbury, M.H., Baeyens, B. (2003). Near-field Sorption Data Bases for Compacted MX-80 Bentonite for Performance Assessment of a High-Level Radioactive Waste Repository in Opalinus Clay Host Rock, Nagra Technical Report 02-18, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

Bussod, G.Y. (2001). An Unsaturated Zone Transport Field Test in Fractured Rock. In: Growing Confidence in Models of Radionuclide Transport for Site-Specific Assessment, Workshop Proceedings, Carlsbad, NM, USA, 14-17 June 1999, NEA/OECD, Paris, France, pp 215–217.

CEC (2004). Backfilling and Sealing of Underground Repositories for Radioactive Waste in Salt (Bambus II Project), CEC Report EUR 20621 EN, CEC, Brussels, Belgium.

Chambers, A.V., Williams, S.J., Wisbey, S.J. (1995) Nirex Near-Field Research: Report on Current Status in 1994. Nirex Science Report S/95/011, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

Crossland, I.G. (2005). Long-term Corrosion of Iron and Copper, Paper 05-1272. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Glasgow, 5–8 Sept 2005, ICEM, http://www.icemconf.com.

Research and development infrastructure

223

Crovisier, J-L., Advocat, T., Dussossoy, J.-L. (2003). Nature and role of natural alteration gels formed on the surface of ancient volcanic glasses (natural analogs of waste containment glasses). J. Nucl. Mater 321, 91–109.

Geckeis, H., Schaefer, T., Hauser, W., Rabung, Th., Missana, T., Degueldre, C., Mo¨ri, A., Eikenberg, J., Fierz, T., Alexander, W.R. (2004). Results of the colloid and radionuclide retardation (CRR) experiment at the Grimsel test site (GTS), Switzerland – impact of reaction kinetics and speciation on radionuclide migration. Radiochim Acta 92, 9–21.

Greenfield, B.F., Holtom, G.J., Hurdus, M.H., O’Kelly, N., Pilkington, N.J., Williams, S.J. (1995). The identification and degradation of isosaccharinic acid, a cellulose degradation product. Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, 1151–1158.

¨

Hallberg, R.O., Ostlund, P., Wadsten, T. (1988). Inferences from a Corrosion Study of a Bronze Cannon, Applied to High Level Nuclear Waste Disposal. Appl. Geochem. 3, 273–280.

Hooper, A.J., Crossland, I.G., Williams, S.J. (2000). Nirex evaluation of deep geological disposal of organicbearing long-lived radioactive wastes, Proc. 12th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Seoul, ROK.

Hooper, A., Mathieson, J., Alexander, W.R., Shiotsuki, M. (2005). Review of international progress in transuranic and long-lived intermediate level waste disposal, ICEM05-1377.- ICEM: Proceedings ICEM ’05. 10th international conference on environmental remediation and radioactive waste management, September 4–8, 2005, Glasgow. ASME, Fairfield, 6.

HSK and KSA (1993). Protection objectives for the disposal of radioactive waste, Report HSK-R-21/e. Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (HSK) and Federal Commission for the Safety of Nuclear Installations (KSA), 5232 Villigen-HSK, Switzerland.

IAEA (2003). Reference biospheres for solid radioactive waste disposal, IAEA Report BIOMASS-6, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.

IAEA (2005). Anthropogenic analogues for geological disposal of high-level and long-lived waste. IAEA Report 1481, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.

Inhofe, J.M. (2006). Yucca Mountain: the most studied real estate on the planet. Report from the US Senate Committee on environment and public works (majority staff, March 2006). US Senate, Washington DC, USA.

JAEA (2007) FEPC & JAEA. The Second Progress Report (TRU-2) on the R&D for TRU (ILW) waste disposal in Japan. JAEA Report (in press). JAEA, Tokai, Japan.

JNC (2000). H12: Project to Establish the Scientific and Technical Basis for HLW Disposal in Japan, JNC, Tokai, Japan.

Johnson, A.B., Francis, B. (1980). Durability of metals from archaeological objects, metal meteorites and native metals, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-3198, Battelle, WA, USA.

Kickmaier, W., McKinley, I.G. (1997). A review of research carried out in European rock laboratories. Nucl. Eng. Design 176, 75–81.

King, F., Ahonen, L., Taxe´n, C., Vuorinen, U., Werme, L. (2001). Copper corrosion under expected conditions in a deep geologic repository, SKB Technical Report TR-01-23, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Knight, J.L. (1998). Use of natural analogues in waste disposal. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 23, No. 3, 233–241.

Kursten, B., Smailos, E., Azkarate, I., Werme, L., Smart, N.R., Marz, G., Cunado, M.A., Santarini, G. (2004). Corrosion evaluation of metallic materials for long-lived HLW/spent fuel disposal containers: Review of 15–20 years of research, In: Davies, C. (Ed.), EURADWASTE’04 Conference Proceedings, 29–31 March 2004 Luxembourg, CEC Report EUR 21027, CEC, Brussels, Belgium, pp 185–195.

Lawrence, T.E. (1935). Seven pillars of wisdom (a triumph). Doubleday, London, UK.

Linklater, C.M. (Ed.) (1998). A natural analogue study of cement buffered, hyperalkaline groundwaters and their interaction with a repository host rock II, Nirex Science Report S/98/003, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

Lutze, W. (1988). Silicate glasses. In: Lutze, W., Ewing, R.C. (Eds.), Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1–159.

Ma¨der, U., Frieg, B., Puigdomenech, I., Decombarieu, M., Yui, M. (2004). Hyperalkaline cement leachate-rock interaction and radionuclide transport in a fractured host rock (HPF Project). Sci Basis Nucl Waste Manag XVII, 861–866.

Mazurek, M., Gautschi, A., Marschall, P., Alexander, W.R., Vigneron, G., Lebon, P., Delay, J. (2006). Transferability of features and processes from underground rock laboratories and natural analogues – use for supporting the Swiss and French Safety Cases in argillaceous formations. Proc. AMIGO II workshop, NEA/OECD, Paris, France.

McKinley, I.G. (1985). The geochemistry of the near-field. Nagra Technical Report Series NTB 84-48, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

224 A. Hooper

McKinley, I.G., Alexander, W.R. (1992). A review of the use of natural analogues to test performance assessment models of a cementitious near field. Waste Manag. 12, 253–259.

MoR (2003). Ministry of Research (France), Research Strategy and Programmes for the Disposal of High Level and Long-lived Radioactive Waste, available at http://www.recherche.gouv.fr/technologie/energie/default.htm.

Mo¨ri, A., Alexander, W.R., Geckeis, H., Hauser, W., Schaefer, T., Eikenberg, J., Fierz, T., Degueldre, C., Missana, T. (2003). The Colloid and Radionuclide Retardation experiment (CRR) at the Grimsel Test Site (GTS): influence of bentonite colloids on radionuclide migration in a fractured rock. Colloids and Surfaces A, 217, 33–47.

Miller, W.M., Alexander, W.R., Chapman, N.A., McKinley, I.G., Smellie, J.A.T. (1994). Natural analogue studies in the geological disposal of radioactive wastes. Studies in Environmental Science 57, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Miller, W.M., Alexander, W.R., Chapman, N.A., McKinley, I.G., Smellie, J.A.T. (2000). Geological disposal of radioactive wastes and natural analogues. Waste Management Series, 2, Pergamon, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Nagra (1994). Kristallin-1 safety assessment report. Nagra Technical Report 93-22, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

Nagra (2002a). Project Opalinus Clay – Safety Report. Nagra Technical Report NTB 02-05, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

Nagra (2002b). Projekt Opalinuston –Konzept fu¨r die Anlage und den Betrieb eines geologischen Tiefenlagers. Nagra Technical Report NTB 02-02, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

NEA (2000). Regulatory reviews of assessments of deep geologic repositories: Lessons learnt, NEA Report, NEA/OECD, Paris, France.

NEA (2001a). Geological disposal of radioactive waste: Review of developments in the last decade. NEA/ OECD, Paris, France.

NEA (2001b). The role of underground laboratories in nuclear waste disposal programmes. NEA/OECD, Paris, France.

NEA (2001c). Going underground for testing, characterisation and demonstration, A Technical Position Paper. NEA/OECD, Paris, France.

NEA (2005a). Chemical thermodynamics series volume 9 (2005): Chemical thermodynamics of compounds and complexes of U, Np, Pu, Am, Tc, Se, Ni and Zr with selected organic ligands. NEA/OECD, Paris, France.

NEA (2005b). Sorption project phase II, interpretation and prediction of radionuclide sorption onto substrates relevant for radioactive waste disposal using thermodynamic sorption models. NEA/OECD, Paris, France.

Nirex (1995). Nirex biosphere research: Report on current status in 1994, Nirex Science Report S/95/003, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

Nirex (1996). Nirex gas generation and migration research: Report on current status in 1994, Nirex Science Report S/96/02, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

Nirex (1997a). An assessment of the post-closure performance of a deep waste repository at Sellafield, Nirex Science Report S/97/012, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

Nirex (1997b). Nirex reference vault backfill. Report on Current Status in 1994, Nirex Science Report S/97/014. Nirex (2001). The scientific foundations of deep geological disposal, Nirex Report N/016, Nirex, Harwell, UK. Nirex (2002). The 2001 United Kingdom radioactive waste inventory, Nirex Reports N/041 to N/048, Nirex,

Harwell, UK.

Nirex (2003). Excavating the future: Archaeology and radioactive waste management, Nirex Report N/068, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

OCRWM (2005). http://www.ocrw.doe.gov/technical/doclist.shtml.

Olyslaegers, G. et al. (13 authors) (2005). A comparative radiological assessment of five European biosphere systems in the context of potential contamination of well water from the hypothetical disposal of radioactive waste. Journal of Radiological Protection, Vol. 25, No4, December 2005, 375–391.

Pate, S.M., McKinley, I.G., Alexander, W.R. (1994). Use of natural analogue test cases to evaluate a new performance assessment TDB. CEC Report EUR15176EN, Brussels, Belgium.

Pedersen, K. (2000). Microbial processes in radioactive waste disposal. SKB Technical Report TR-00-04, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pitty, A. (2007). A natural analogue study of cement buffered, hyperalkaline groundwaters and their interaction with a repository host rock IV: clay buffer alteration, matrix diffusion and other retardation processes. Andra Technical Report (in prep), Andra, Paris, France.

Research and development infrastructure

225

Poinssot, C., Cavedon, J.M., Cowper, M., Grambow, B., McMenamin, T. (2004). Development of radionuclide source term for spent fuel in geological disposal. Major outcomes of the European projects ‘‘in can processes’’ and ‘‘spent fuel stability’’, In: Davies, C. (Ed.), EURADWASTE’04 Conference Proceedings, 29–31 March 2004 Luxembourg, CEC Report EUR 21027, CEC, Brussels, Belgium, pp 173–183.

Pro¨hl, G., Texier, D. (2004). Conclusions of the 5th EU framework projects BIOCLIM and BioMoSA for performance assessments of radioactive waste disposal, In: Davies, C. (Ed.), EURADWASTE’04 Conference Proceedings, 29–31 March 2004 Luxembourg, CEC EUR 21027, Luxembourg, pp 227–238.

Pro¨hl, G. et al. (13 authors) (2005). Development and comparison of five site-specific biosphere models for safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal. Journal of Radiological Protection 25, pp 343–373.

Pusch, R. (1999). Clay colloid formation and release from MX-80 Buffer, SKB Technical Report TR-99-31, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pusch, R. (2001). The Buffer and Backfill Handbook Part I – Definitions, basic relationships, and laboratory methods, SKB Technical Report TR-02-12, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pusch, R. (2002). The Buffer and Backfill Handbook Part II – Materials and Techniques, SKB Technical Report TR-02-20, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pusch, R., Takahase, H., Benbow, S. (1998). Chemical processes causing cementation in heat-affected Smectite. The Kinnekulle Bentonite, SKB Technical Report SKB TR-98-25, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Ribet, P., van Iseghem, E., Valcke., J-L., Crovisier, E. Curti, E. Del Nero, M., Grambow, B. Luckscheiter, B., Lemens, K., Schwyn, B. (2004). GLASTAB, CORALLUS-II, GLAMOR: Long-term behaviour studies of vitrified high-level waste, In: Davies, C. (Ed.), EURADWASTE’04 Conference Proceedings, 29–31 March 2004 Luxembourg, EU Report EUR 21027, EU, Luxembourg, pp 161–171.

Rothefuchs, T., Bollingerfehr, W., Bechthold, W. (2004). Lessons learnt for large-scale experiments at the Asse Mine Germany. In: EURADWASTE’04 Conference Proceedings, 29–31 March 2004 Luxembourg, Davies C, EU Report EUR 21027, EU, Luxembourg.

Ruiz-Lopez, C. et al. (17 others) (2004). Analogue application to safety assessment and communication of radioactive waste geological disposal. Illustrative Synthesis, Coleccion Ducumentos I+D 11.2004, Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear, Madrid, Spain.

Senger, R., Fujiwara, A., Lanyon, W., Marschall, P., Vomvoris, S. (2006). Modelling approaches for the design and analysis of the GMT at the Grimsel Test Site, Switzerland, In: Proceedings of the 11th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, April 30 – May 4, 2006, Las Vegas, Nevada American Nuclear Society, Washington, USA.

Shimura, T., Fujiwara, A., Vomvoris, S., Marschall, P., Lanyon, B., Ando, K., Yamamoto, S. (2006). Large scale gas migration test at Grimsel Test Site. Proceedings of the 11th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, April 30 – May 4, 2006, Las Vegas, Nevada American Nuclear Society, Washington, USA.

SKB (1999). Deep Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel: SR97 – Post-Closure Safety, SKB Technical Report TR- 99-06, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

¨ ¨

SKB (2004). Aspo Hard Rock Laboratory, Annual Report 2003, SKB Technical Report TR-04-10, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.

SKB (2005). Encapsulation: When, where, how and why? Information Brochure, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden. Smellie, J.A.T., Alexander, W.R., Degnan, P., Griffault, L.Y., Ma¨der, U.K., Trotignon, L. (2001). The role of the Jordan natural analogue studies in the performance assessment of cementitious repositories for radioactive wastes. In: Proceedings of the 10th Int. Water-Rock Interaction Symposium, Villasimius,

Italy. June 10–15, 2001, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1391–1393.

Stu¨hrenberg, D., Heusermann, S. (2004). Laboratory investigation on backfill and rock salt within the BAMBUS II Project, In: Davies, C. (Ed.), EURADWASTE’04 Conference Proceedings, 29–31 March 2004 Luxembourg, CEC Report EUR 21027, CEC, Brussels, Belgium, pp 451–455.

Sumerling, T. (2006). The international RD&D basis for geological repositories: An overview of recent research, development and demonstration (RD&D) activities relevant to the implementation of deep geological repositories for radioactive waste. Report to United Kingdom Nirex Limited, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

Sumerling, T., Zuidema, P., Schneider, J., van Dorp, F. (2001). Treatment of the Biosphere – Seeking Credible Illustrations. In: Proceedings of the 9th International High Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, Las Vegas, Session N-7 American Nuclear Society, Washington DC, USA.

Swanton, S.W. Myatt, B.J. (2003). The formation of colloids from The Nirex reference vault backfill (NRVB) III: Leaching of NRVB monoliths for up to 34 months, Serco Assurance Report for Nirex SA/ENV-0426, Nirex, Harwell, UK.

226

A. Hooper

Volckaert, G., Holvoet, F.-X., Gens, A., Vaunat, J., Lassabatere, Th., Imbert, Ch., Villar, M., Mouche, E., Genty, A., Lepotier, C., Cany, F., Millard, A. (1998). RESEAL: a Large Scale in situ Demonstration for REpository SEALing in an Argillaceous Host Rock. In: situ Testing in Underground Research Laboratories for Radioactive Waste Disposal, Proceedings of a CLUSTER Seminar, Alden Biesen, Belgium, 10–11 Dec 1997, EUR 18323, EU, Brussels, Belgium, pp 39–57.

Volckaert, G., Bernier, F., Sillen, X., Van Geet, M., Mayor, J.-C., Go¨bel, I., Blu¨mling, P., Frieg, B., Su, K. (2004). Similarities and differences in the behaviour of plastic and Indurated Clays. In: Davies, C. (Ed.), EURADWASTE’04 Conference Proceedings, 29–31 March 2004 Luxembourg, CEC Report EUR 21027, CEC, Brussels, Belgium, pp 281–291.

West, J.M., Coombs, P., Gardner, S.J., Rochelle, C.A. (1995). The microbiology of the Maqarin site, Jordan – a natural analogue for cementitious radioactive waste repositories. Sci. Basis Nucl. Waste Manag. XVIII, 181–188.

Wieland, E., Van Loon, L.R. (2002). Cementitious near-field sorption data base for performance assessment of an ILW repository in Opalinus Clay, Nagra Technical Report 02–20, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

Wieland, E., Tits, J., Bradbury, M.H. (2004). The potential effect of cementitious colloids on radionuclide mobilisation in a repository for radioactive waste. Appl. Geochem. 19, 119–135.

Yoshikawa, H., Ueno, K., Honda, T., Yamaguchi, S., Yui, M. (2003). Analysis of the Excavated Archaeological Iron Using XRay-CT, Paper 03-4776. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Sept 21–25, Oxford UK ICEM, http://www.icemconf.com.