Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
ENGLISH TENSES.doc
Скачиваний:
23
Добавлен:
22.08.2019
Размер:
1.56 Mб
Скачать

§ 2. The Use of the Future Continuous in the Past

The Future Continuous in the Past denotes an action in progress at a definite moment which was future from the point of view of the past. It also preserves other meanings of its use. The Future Continuous in the Past is mostly used in indirect (reported) speech.

E.g. They said (that) they would be waiting for him from 10 till 11 next Tuesday.

She was sure (that) they would be discussing the same problem when she came back.

THE FUTURE PERFECT IN THE PAST

(THE FUTURE PERFECT SIMPLE IN THE PAST)

§ 1. The Formation of the Future Perfect in the Past

  1. We form the Future Perfect in the Past by means of the auxiliary verb TO HAVE in the Future Indefinite in the Past (would have) and Participle II of the main verb.

WOULD HAVE + PARTICIPLE II (Ved/V3)

E.g. I would have written the letter by 6 o’clock the next day.

She would have translated the text by the time the bell rang.

In informal English we can also use short affirmative forms.

Full affirmative forms

Short affirmative forms

I (he, she, it, we, you, they) would have worked.

I (he, she, it, we, you, they)’d have worked.

  1. In negative sentences we place the negative particle NOT after the first part (would) of the auxiliary verb TO HAVE. In informal English we use short negative forms.

E.g. I would not have the letter by 6 o’clock the next day.

She wouldn’t have translated the text by the time the bell rang.

Full negative forms

Short negative forms

I (he, she, it, we, you, they) would not have worked.

I (he, she, it, we, you, they) wouldn’t have worked.

  1. In interrogative sentences (questions) we place the first part (would) of the auxiliary verb TO HAVE before the subject.

E.g. Would I have written the letter by 6 o’clock the next day?

Would she have translated the text by the time the bell rang?

  1. In negative-interrogative sentences (negative questions) we place the first part (would) of the auxiliary verb TO HAVE before the subject and the negative particle NOT after the subject. In informal English we place short negative forms before the subject.

E.g. Would I not have written the letter by 6 o’clock the next day?

Wouldn’t she have translated the text by the time the bell rang?

Full negative-interrogative forms

Short negative-interrogative forms

Would I (he, she, it, we, you, they) not have worked?

Wouldn’t I (he, she, it, we, you, they) have worked?

§ 2. The Use of the Future Perfect in the Past

The Future Perfect in the Past denotes an action completed before a definite moment which was future from the point of view of the past. It also preserves other meanings of its use. The Future Perfect in the Past is mostly used in indirect (reported) speech.

E.g. His parents said (that) they would have got the telegram by morning.

Ann told me (that) she would have been a student for a year by next September.

THE FUTURE PERFECT CONTINUOUS IN THE PAST

(THE FUTURE PERFECT PROGRESSIVE IN THE PAST)

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]