- •2006 Evaluation of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area Express (max) Bus Rapid Transit Project
- •Max is one of 17 National brt Projects that make up the brt Consortium supported by fta
- •Executive Summary III max Project Fact Sheet VII
- •List of Exhibits 79
- •1.0 Introduction
- •1.1 Evaluation Overview
- •1.2 Max Evaluation Objectives
- •Max evaluation objectives
- •Figure 2-1: max system schematic map
- •2.1 Project and Corridor Description
- •2.2 Running Ways
- •Figure 2-2: More than half of max’s 7.5 mile route is an exclusive curbside bus lane
- •2.3 Stations
- •Figure 2-3: Typical max station (Jerry’s Nugget South)
- •Figure 2-4: Lake Mead station with max ticket vending machine
- •Figure 2-5: Las Vegas Downtown Transportation Center
- •2.4 Vehicles
- •2.5 Fare Collection
- •Figure 2-10: Ticket Vending Machine
- •Figure 2-11: Uniformed security officer checking for fare proof of payment using Personal Digital Assistant
- •2.6 Intelligent Transportation Systems (its)
- •2.7 Service and Operations Plans
- •2.8 Branding and Marketing
- •Figure 2-12: max marketing materials
- •Figure 2-13: Opening Day Celebration
- •3.0 System costs
- •3.1 Capital Costs
- •Table 3-1: Overview of Capital Costs associated with the max service*
- •3.2 Operating Costs
- •Vehicle Operation & Maintenance
- •Table 3-2: max Operating Costs, July 2004 to December 2005
- •4.1 Planning and Design
- •4.2 Vehicle Service, Maintenance and Operations Plan
- •Vehicle Service Plan
- •Vehicle Maintenance
- •Vehicle Operations
- •4.3 Implementation and Management of the its Elements
- •4.4 Branding and Public Acceptance of Service
- •Figure 4-2: Deuce, rtc's new double decker bus, operates on the heavily traveled Las Vegas strip.
- •Table 4-3: Importance of max features in docking the vehicle for precise stops*
- •5.1 Travel Time
- •Table 5-5: Has your travel time changed since riding max?
- •Figure 5-1: Has your travel time changed since riding max? (October 2005)
- •Table 5-6: Rate the speed of travel on max and cat
- •Table 5-7: For riders transferring from other cat/max routes, how long did you wait at the location you transferred? (October 2005)
- •Table 5-8: Rate the Wait Time at max and cat Stations
- •Table 5-9: Dwell Time Model Results
- •5.2 Reliability
- •Table 5-10: Rate the Dependability of max and cat
- •Figure 5-3: Driver Assessment of max features for route speed and reliability compared to cat
- •5.3 Identity and Image
- •Table 5-11: Passenger Rating of Vehicles and Shelters,
- •Max and cat riders
- •Table 5-12: All things considered rating of max and cat by riders of the service
- •Figure 5-4: Overall Rating of max / cat Service (October 2005)
- •Figure 5-5: Survey of cat riders, “Have you ever ridden max?”
- •Table 5-13: Overall rating of max service by cat riders and cat service by max riders
- •Figure 5-6: Survey of cat riders, “Do you prefer to ride cat or max?”
- •5.4 Safety and Security
- •Table 5-14: Rate the Safety of max / cat Vehicle
- •Figure 5-8: Rate the Safety of max Stations / cat Stops (October 2005)
- •5.5 Capacity
- •6.1 Ridership
- •Figure 6-1: Average Boardings per Day, max and 113, January 2004 to July 2006
- •Figure 6-3: Index of Changes in Boardings, lvbn Corridor and Systemwide
- •Table 6-1: Previous mode of max riders
- •Figure 6-4: Previous mode of max riders (October 2005)
- •Table 6-2: Rider ethnicity
- •Figure 6-5: Rider ethnicity
- •Table 6-3: Rider age
- •Figure 6-6: Rider age
- •Table 6-4: Employment status
- •Figure 6-7: Employment status
- •Table 6-5: Rider gender
- •6.2 Capital Cost Effectiveness
- •6.3 Operating Cost Efficiency
- •Figure 6-8: Intensity of Use, max compared to 113
- •Figure 6-9: max Operating Cost per Vehicle Hour
- •Figure 6-10: max Operating Cost per Boarding
- •6.4 Land Use
- •Figure 6-11: Opportunities for Redevelopment: North Las Vegas
- •6.5 Environmental Quality
- •7.1 Max is a success
- •7.2 What Works
- •Table 7-1: Calculation of Time Savings per Trip due to Dwell Time Reduction during Peak (7 am to 7 pm)
- •7.3 Summary of Lessons Learned
- •Vehicle Procurement
- •Its: Traffic Signal Priority and Queue Jumper Technology
- •Brt max Service Questionnaire
Table 5-5: Has your travel time changed since riding max?
|
April 2005 |
October 2005 |
||
Response |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Yes, 1-5 minutes faster |
16 |
7.1% |
20 |
9.0% |
Yes, 6-10 minutes faster |
38 |
16.9% |
39 |
17.5% |
Yes, 11-15 minutes faster |
60 |
26.7% |
54 |
24.2% |
Yes, More than 15 minutes faster |
90 |
40.0% |
82 |
36.8% |
No, about the same |
19 |
8.4% |
23 |
10.3% |
Yes, slower |
2 |
0.9% |
5 |
2.2% |
Total |
225 |
100.0% |
223 |
100.0% |
Figure 5-1: Has your travel time changed since riding max? (October 2005)
MAX riders were asked the main reason they prefer to ride MAX. In April 2005, 72.4% listed faster travel time among the main reasons for choosing MAX. In October 2005, this figure declined to 64.3%.
In both April and October, 69.3% of respondents rated the speed of MAX travel as excellent. In comparison, only 5.8% and 12% of CAT riders rated the speed as excellent (see Table 5-6).
Table 5-6: Rate the speed of travel on max and cat
|
April 2005 |
October 2005 |
||
MAX |
CAT 113 |
MAX |
CAT 113 |
|
Excellent |
69.3% |
5.8% |
69.3% |
12.0% |
Good |
28.4% |
47.6% |
29.8% |
44.0% |
Fair |
2.2% |
31.6% |
0.9% |
34.7% |
Poor |
0.0% |
14.7% |
0.0% |
8.9% |
Wait and Transfer Time
The majority of MAX riders transferring from other routes (52.8%) indicated that their wait at the transfer point was between 1 and 5 minutes; only 11% waited 16 minutes or more. Route 113 riders were much more likely to have a longer wait: only 26.6% waited 1 to 5 minutes and 34% waited more than 16 minutes. Table 5-7 shows the responses to this wait time inquiry.
Table 5-7: For riders transferring from other cat/max routes, how long did you wait at the location you transferred? (October 2005)
|
MAX |
CAT 113 |
||
Response |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
1-5 minutes |
38 |
52.8% |
25 |
26.6% |
6-10 minutes |
12 |
16.7% |
22 |
23.4% |
11-15 minutes |
14 |
19.4% |
15 |
16.0% |
16-20 minutes |
2 |
2.8% |
12 |
12.7% |
More than 20 minutes |
6 |
8.3% |
20 |
21.3% |
Total |
72 |
100.0% |
94 |
100.0% |
In both April and October, 60% of respondents rated MAX wait time as excellent (see Table 5-8). In comparison, only 3% to 7% rated Route 113 wait time as excellent. More than one quarter of respondents said that Route 113 wait time was poor, but not a single person said that MAX wait time was poor.