Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Max_Evaluation.doc
Скачиваний:
5
Добавлен:
20.11.2018
Размер:
12.76 Mб
Скачать

4.4 Branding and Public Acceptance of Service

As discussed, when planning and designing MAX, RTC branded the service so that it would be distinct from existing CAT services and attract a higher portion of “choice” riders. The branding exercise was successful; after one year of operations, MAX ridership increased by nearly 40 percent, from 7,000 daily riders to 9,800, and survey results show a majority of people identify MAX as providing faster and more reliable services (see Chapter 6).

As the Study Team examined the impact of the MAX brand, it became apparent that the experience with MAX has also played an important role in shaping the perception and expectation for transit service delivery. Indeed, the successful implementation of MAX on Las Vegas Boulevard is leading to expansion of the service to other parts of the RTC service area. In addition, our research suggests that experience implementing MAX has been at least partially responsible for both RTC staff’s willingness to experiment with additional innovative transit services and the community’s willingness to accept them.

Additional MAX Routes

After successfully implementing a premier rapid transit service, RTC was able to obtain the cooperation of local governments to expand the MAX service into a broader system of BRT services. The City of Las Vegas, for example, has agreed to use existing right-of-way to create a center-running exclusive busway through Downtown and on Grand Central Parkway. This new route will be branded as MAX with the same colors and look as the existing MAX. The station designs will be context-sensitive and reflect the cultural resources of the surrounding community.

In 2005, RTC released an RFP seeking to purchase 50 vehicles similar to those used on the first MAX route, to be used on in the summer of 2008 for the Boulder Highway MAX and the Downtown Connector MAX. Seven manufacturers responded to the RFP. In June 2006, RTC announced a deal with the Wright Group of Northern Ireland, UK to procure 50 StreetCar BRT vehicles, which have rail-like styling, in the manner of the CIVIS (see Figure 4-1). Unlike the CIVIS, the StreetCar does not have optical guidance. ISE Corporation of San Diego will provide hybrid diesel electric engines.

Figure 4-1: An illustration of one of the 50 new BRT vehicles to be added to the MAX fleet. This vehicle is being manufactured by the Wright Group of Northern Ireland. It will resemble the CIVIS but will not have optical guidance.

Regional Fixed Guideway

The MAX experience has also influenced other regional transportation projects. Las Vegas has been examining the potential of using BRT technology for the proposed regional fixed guideway, a 33-mile long-distance transit service bisecting the Las Vegas Valley, since 2002. During this time, the community has been considering both bus and rail technologies. After considerable debate and after MAX was successfully implemented, the RTC Board voted in April 2006 to designate rubber-tire rapid transit technology such as MAX, as the Locally Preferred Alternative for further consideration in an environmental impact statement and alternatives analysis. The Downtown Connector MAX would effectively be the first stage of the RFG.

New Transit Services and Products

RTC also launched a new double decker bus service, the “Deuce”, operating along the Las Vegas strip (see Figure 4-2). The service commenced in late October 2005 and was designed to accommodate larger volumes of passengers; up to 97 people can fit on each bus. Although the Deuce operation plan is more consistent with regular CAT service, it provides another example of the RTC implementing innovative services.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]