- •Preface
- •Foreword
- •The Henri Poincaré Prize
- •Contributors
- •Contents
- •Stability of Doubly Warped Product Spacetimes
- •Introduction
- •Warped Product Spacetimes
- •Asymptotic Behavior
- •Fuchsian Method
- •Velocity Dominated Equations
- •Velocity Dominated Solution
- •Stability
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Tomonaga Model with Infrared Cutoff
- •The RG Analysis
- •The Dyson Equation
- •The First Ward Identity
- •The Second Ward Identity
- •The Euclidean Thirring Model
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Lie and Hopf Algebras of Feynman Graphs
- •From Hochschild Cohomology to Physics
- •Dyson-Schwinger Equations
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Quantum Representation and Dynamical Equations
- •Quantum Singularity Problem
- •Examples for Properties of Solutions
- •Effective Theory
- •Summary
- •Introduction
- •Results and Strategy of Proofs
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Critical Scaling Limits and SLE
- •Percolation
- •The Critical Loop Process
- •General Features
- •Construction of a Single Loop
- •The Near-Critical Scaling Limit
- •References
- •Black Hole Entropy Function and Duality
- •Introduction
- •Entropy Function and Electric/Magnetic Duality Covariance
- •Duality Invariant OSV Integral
- •References
- •Weak Turbulence for Periodic NLS
- •Introduction
- •Arnold Diffusion for the Toy Model ODE
- •References
- •Angular Momentum-Mass Inequality for Axisymmetric Black Holes
- •Introduction
- •Variational Principle for the Mass
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Trace Map
- •Introduction
- •Notations
- •Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Error-Correcting Codes
- •The Channel Model: Discretization of Errors
- •The Entanglement-Assisted Canonical Code
- •The General Case
- •Distance
- •Generalized F4 Construction
- •Bounds on Performance
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Particle Decay in Ising Field Theory with Magnetic Field
- •Ising Field Theory
- •Evolution of the Mass Spectrum
- •Particle Decay off the Critical Isotherm
- •Unstable Particles in Finite Volume
- •References
- •Lattice Supersymmetry from the Ground Up
- •References
- •Stable Maps are Dense in Dimensional One
- •Introduction
- •Density of Hyperbolicity
- •Quasi-Conformal Rigidity
- •How to Prove Rigidity?
- •The Strategy of the Proof of QC-Rigidity
- •Enhanced Nest Construction
- •Small Distortion of Thin Annuli
- •Approximating Non-renormalizable Complex Polynomials
- •References
- •Large Gap Asymptotics for Random Matrices
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Coupled Oscillators
- •Closure Equations
- •Introduction
- •Conservative Stochastic Dynamics
- •Diffusive Evolution: Green-Kubo Formula
- •Kinetic Limits: Phonon Boltzmann Equation
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Bethe Ansatz for Classical Lie Algebras
- •The Pseudo-Differential Equations
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Kinetically Constrained Models
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Local Limits for Exit Measures
- •References
- •Young Researchers Symposium Plenary Lectures
- •Dynamics of Quasiperiodic Cocycles and the Spectrum of the Almost Mathieu Operator
- •Magic in Superstring Amplitudes
- •XV International Congress on Mathematical Physics Plenary Lectures
- •The Riemann-Hilbert Problem: Applications
- •Trying to Characterize Robust and Generic Dynamics
- •Cauchy Problem in General Relativity
- •Survey of Recent Mathematical Progress in the Understanding of Critical 2d Systems
- •Random Methods in Quantum Information Theory
- •Gauge Fields, Strings and Integrable Systems
- •XV International Congress on Mathematical Physics Specialized Sessions
- •Condensed Matter Physics
- •Rigorous Construction of Luttinger Liquids Through Ward Identities
- •Edge and Bulk Currents in the Integer Quantum Hall Effect
- •Dynamical Systems
- •Statistical Stability for Hénon Maps of Benedics-Carleson Type
- •Entropy and the Localization of Eigenfunctions
- •Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics
- •Short-Range Spin Glasses in a Magnetic Field
- •Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics
- •Current Fluctuations in Boundary Driven Interacting Particle Systems
- •Fourier Law and Random Walks in Evolving Environments
- •Exactly Solvable Systems
- •Correlation Functions and Hidden Fermionic Structure of the XYZ Spin Chain
- •Particle Decay in Ising Field Theory with Magnetic Field
- •General Relativity
- •Einstein Spaces as Attractors for the Einstein Flow
- •Loop Quantum Cosmology
- •Operator Algebras
- •From Vertex Algebras to Local Nets of von Neuman Algebras
- •Non-Commutative Manifolds and Quantum Groups
- •Partial Differential Equations
- •Weak Turbulence for Periodic NSL
- •Ginzburg-Landau Dynamics
- •Probability Theory
- •From Planar Gaussian Zeros to Gravitational Allocation
- •Quantum Mechanics
- •Recent Progress in the Spectral Theory of Quasi-Periodic Operators
- •Recent Results on Localization for Random Schrödinger Operators
- •Quantum Field Theory
- •Algebraic Aspects of Perturbative and Non-Perturbative QFT
- •Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time
- •Lattice Supersymmetry From the Ground Up
- •Analytical Solution for the Effective Charging Energy of the Single Electron Box
- •Quantum Information
- •One-and-a-Half Quantum de Finetti Theorems
- •Catalytic Quantum Error Correction
- •Random Matrices
- •Probabilities of a Large Gap in the Scaled Spectrum of Random Matrices
- •Random Matrices, Asymptotic Analysis, and d-bar Problems
- •Stochastic PDE
- •Degenerately Forced Fluid Equations: Ergodicity and Solvable Models
- •Microscopic Stochastic Models for the Study of Thermal Conductivity
- •String Theory
- •Gauge Theory and Link Homologies
Black Hole Entropy Function and Duality
Gabriel Lopes Cardoso
Abstract The macroscopic entropy and the attractor equations for extremal black hole solutions follow from a variational principle based on an entropy function. We review this variational principle for static extremal black holes in four space-time dimensions and we apply it to N = 2 supergravity theories with higher-curvature interactions.
1 Introduction
String theory provides a microscopic derivation of the macroscopic BekensteinHawking entropy of certain supersymmetric black holes [21]. An important feature of supersymmetric black holes is that they are charged and are supported by scalar fields. In the black hole background these scalar fields vary radially as one moves from spatial infinity to the horizon of the black hole, and they get attracted to specific values at the horizon which are determined by the black hole charges. This is the so-called attractor mechanism, which was first studied in [10, 20, 9, 8]. As a result, the macroscopic entropy is entirely determined in terms of the black hole charges and can be compared with the microscopic entropy based on state counting. The attractor mechanism is, however, not just a feature of supersymmetric black holes, but is also present for extremal non-supersymmetric black holes [11, 12, 18, 13]. The attractor behaviour is encoded in a set of attractor equations, which can be obtained by extremizing a so-called entropy function [18]. In addition, the value of this function at the extremum yields the macroscopic entropy of the extremal black hole.
We review the entropy function for static extremal black hole solutions in four space-time dimensions using the approach of [5] based on electric/magnetic duality
Gabriel Lopes Cardoso
Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Department für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität München, Munich, Germany, e-mail: gcardoso@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de
V. Sidoraviciusˇ (ed.), New Trends in Mathematical Physics, |
127 |
© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009 |
|
128 |
Gabriel Lopes Cardoso |
covariance. Then, following [17], we specialize to the case of N = 2 supergravity theories with higher-curvature interactions. We also review the construction of a duality invariant OSV integral formula for supersymmetric black holes [4]. We refer to [5, 4] for a detailed discussion of these topics.
2 Entropy Function and Electric/Magnetic Duality Covariance
Let us consider static extremal black hole solutions to the equations of motion of a general system of Abelian vector gauge fields, scalar and matter fields coupled to gravity in four space-time dimensions. Following [18], we take the near-horizon geometry of such a black hole to be of the form AdS2 × S2. Thus, we consider near-horizon solutions with spherical symmetry, which may be written as
ds(24) = gμν dxμdxν = v1 |
− r2 dt 2 + |
dr2 |
+ v2 |
dθ 2 + sin2 θ dϕ2 , |
|
||
r2 |
(1) |
||||||
FrIt = eI , FθIϕ = |
pI |
|
sin θ . |
|
|
|
|
4π |
|
|
|
|
Here the FμνI denote the field strengths associated with a number of Abelian gauge fields. The θ -dependence of FθIϕ is fixed by rotational invariance and the pI denote the magnetic charges. The fields eI are dual to the electric charges. In addition to the constant fields eI , v1 and v2 there may be a number of other fields which for the moment we denote collectively by uα .
As is well known theories based on Abelian vector fields are subject to electric/magnetic duality, because their equations of motion expressed in terms of the dual field strengths,1
|
= |
|
| | |
|
∂FρσI |
(2) |
GμνI |
|
|
g |
εμνρσ |
∂L , |
take the same form as the Bianchi identities for the field strengths FμνI . Adopting the conventions where xμ = (t, r, θ , ϕ) and εt rθ ϕ = 1, and the signature of the space-time metric equals (−, +, +, +), it follows that, in the background (1),
G |
v |
v |
|
sin θ |
∂L |
v |
v |
|
sin θ |
∂L |
, |
|||||
θ ϕI = − 1 |
|
2 |
|
∂FrIt |
= − |
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
∂eI |
(3) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
∂L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∂L |
|
||
G |
v |
v |
|
sin θ |
= − |
4π v |
v |
|
. |
|
||||||
|
rt I = − 1 |
|
2 |
|
∂FθIϕ |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 ∂pI |
|
1 Here and henceforth we assume that the Lagrangian depends on the Abelian field strengths but not on their space-time derivatives. We also assume that the gauge fields appear exclusively through their field strengths.
Black Hole Entropy Function and Duality |
129 |
These two tensors can be written as qI sin θ /(4π ) and fI . The quantities qI are conjugate to pI and eI , respectively, and can be written as
∂L qI (e, p, v, u) = −4π v1v2 ∂eI ,
∂L fI (e, p, v, u) = −4π v1v2 ∂pI .
and fI
(4)
The qI are constant by virtue of the equations of motion and correspond to the electric charges. Electric/magnetic duality transformations are induced by rotating the tensors FμνI and Gμν I by a constant transformation, so that the new linear combina-
tions are all subject to Bianchi identities. This leads to new quantities (p˜I , q˜I ) and
(e˜I , f˜I ).
Next, we define the reduced Lagrangian by the integral of the full Lagrangian over the horizon two-sphere S2,
F (e, p, v, u) = dθ dϕ |g|L. (5)
We note that the definition of the conjugate quantities qI and fI takes the form,
q |
I = − |
∂F |
, f |
I = − |
∂F |
. |
(6) |
|
∂eI |
|
∂pI |
|
It is known that a Lagrangian does not transform as a function under electric/magnetic dualities. Instead we have [6],
˜ |
|
|
1 |
|
I |
|
˜ |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
(e, p, v, u) |
+ |
|
eI q |
|
+ |
fI pI |
] = F |
(e, p, v, u) |
+ |
|
[ |
eI qI |
+ |
f |
pI |
] |
(7) |
|
F ˜ ˜ |
2 |
[ ˜ ˜ |
|
|
˜ |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
so that the linear combination F (e, p, v, u) + 12 [eI qI + fI pI ] transforms as a function. It is easy to see that the combination eI qI − fI pI transforms as a function as well, so that we may construct a modification of (5) that no longer involves the fI and that transforms as a function under electric/magnetic duality,
E (q, p, v, u) = −F (e, p, v, u) − eI qI , |
(8) |
which takes the form of a Legendre transform in view of the first equation (6). In this way we obtain a function of electric and magnetic charges. Therefore it trans-
E ˜ ˜ |
= E |
(q, p, v, u). |
forms under electric/magnetic duality according to ˜(q, p, v, u) |
|
Furthermore the field equations imply that the qI are constant and that the action,dt dr E , is stationary under variations of the fields v and u, while keeping the pI and qI fixed. This is to be expected as E is in fact the analogue of the Hamiltonian density associated with the reduced Lagrangian density (5), at least as far as the vector fields are concerned. The constant values of the fields v1,2 and uα are thus determined by demanding E to be stationary under variations of v and u,
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gabriel Lopes Cardoso |
|
∂E |
= |
|
∂E |
= |
0. |
(9) |
|
∂v |
∂u |
|||||
|
|
|
|
The function 2π E (q, p, v, u) coincides with the entropy function proposed by Sen [18]. Equation (9) is the so-called attractor equation and the macroscopic entropy is directly proportional to the value of E at the stationary point,
Smacro(p, q) E |
attractor. |
(10) |
|
|
|
The above derivation of the entropy function applies to any gauge and general coordinate invariant Lagrangian, and, in particular, also to Lagrangians containing higher-derivative interactions. The entropy computed by (10) is Wald’s entropy [22, 14, 15] which, in the absence of higher-derivative interactions, reduces to the area law of Bekenstein and Hawking.
In the absence of higher-derivative terms, the reduced Lagrangian F is at most quadratic in eI and pI and the Legendre transform (8) can easily be carried out. For instance, consider the following Lagrangian in four space-time dimensions (we only concentrate on terms quadratic in the field strengths),
L0 = − |
1 |
NI J Fμν+I F |
+μνJ − N¯ I J Fμν−I F −μνJ , |
(11) |
4 |
where Fμν±I denote the (anti)-selfdual field strengths. In the context of this paper the tensors Fr±t I = ±iFθ±ϕI = 12 (FrIt ± iFθIϕ ) are relevant, where underlined indices refer
to the tangent space. It is straightforward to evaluate the entropy function (8) in this case,
|
v1 |
(qI |
− N |
I K pK ) (Im |
|
)−1 |
] |
I J (qJ |
¯ J LpL), |
(12) |
|
E = − 8π v2 |
N |
||||||||||
|
[ |
|
|
− N |
|
which is indeed compatible with electric/magnetic duality. Upon decomposing into real matrices, iNI J = μI J −iνI J , this result coincides with the corresponding terms in the so-called black hole potential
VBH |
= |
1 |
(p, q)T |
p , |
|
μ + νμ−1ν |
νμ−1 , (13) |
|
2 |
||||||||
|
|
M q |
M = |
μ−1ν |
μ−1 |
discussed in [11], and more recently in [13]. Namely, setting v1 = v2 (which enforces the vanishing of the curvature scalar) we obtain E = (4π )−1 VBH.
3 Application to N = 2 Supergravity
We now give the entropy function for N = 2 supergravity coupled to n Abelian N = 2 vector multiplets, first at the two-derivative level and then in the presence of higher-curvature interactions proportional to the square of the Weyl tensor. Here we
Black Hole Entropy Function and Duality |
131 |
follow the conventions of [3], where the charges and the Lagrangian have different normalizations than in the previous section.
The N = 2 vector multiplets contain complex physical scalar fields which we denote by XI , I = 0, . . . , n. At the two-derivative-level, the action for the vector multiplets is encoded in a holomorphic function F (X). The coupling to supergravity requires this function to be homogeneous of second degree, i.e. F (λX) = λ2 F (X). The gauge coupling functions NI J in (11) are given in terms of derivatives of F (X),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
2i |
ImFI K ImFJ LXK XL |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NI J = ¯I J + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ImFMN XM XN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
where FI = ∂F (X)/∂XI |
and FI J |
|
= ∂2F (X)/∂XI ∂XJ . |
|
|
|
= v2, the resulting |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposing the vanishing of the Ricci scalar, i.e. setting v1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
entropy function (12) can be brought into the equivalent form [5], |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E = |
1 |
Σ |
+ |
1 |
|
N I J ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
I K P |
K )( |
QJ |
|
|
|
F |
|
L), |
|
|
|
|
|
(15) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QI − |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
¯J LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
where |
|
|
|
|
|
= − |
|
¯ |
|
|
|
I |
− |
|
|
|
¯I |
|
− |
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
¯ |
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
I |
+ |
¯I |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Σ |
|
|
|
|
i |
|
Y I F |
|
|
|
|
|
Y I F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
q |
(Y I |
|
|
Y I ) |
|
|
|
pI (F |
|
|
F |
|
), |
|
|
(16) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P |
I |
≡ |
pI |
+ |
i(Y I |
|
|
Y I ), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
¯ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QI |
≡ |
q |
+ |
i(F |
I − |
|
¯I |
). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Here the Y I |
|
are related to the XI by a uniform rescaling and FI |
denotes the deriva- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tive of F (Y ) with respect to |
Y |
I |
. Also NI J |
|
|
|
|
i |
(F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
I J |
) |
|
|
|
F |
I J |
|
∂2F (Y )/ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
= |
|
¯I J |
|
− |
|
|
|
, where |
|
= |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
∂Y I ∂Y J . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Varying the entropy function (15) with respect to the scalar fields Y I |
yields the |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
attractor equations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
QI − |
|
|
I J P |
|
|
|
− |
|
i |
QK |
− |
|
¯KM P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P I Q |
|
|
|
|
QL − |
¯LN P |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
J |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
|
|
N KP F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N QL |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
N |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
= 0, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18) |
||
where F |
P I Q |
= |
∂3F (Y )/∂Y P ∂Y I ∂Y Q |
. The attractor |
equations determine the hori- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
, qI ). Because the function |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zon value of the Y |
|
in terms of the black hole charges (p |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F (Y ) |
is homogeneous of second degree, |
we have F |
I J K |
Y K |
= |
0. Using this relation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
K |
|
|
|
J |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
one deduces from (18) that (QJ − FJ K P |
|
|
)Y |
|
= 0, which is equivalent to |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
I |
− |
|
|
|
|
|
¯I |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
I − |
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i(Y I F |
|
|
|
Y I F |
) |
|
|
|
|
pI F |
|
|
|
|
|
q |
Y I . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Therefore, at the attractor point, we have |
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
¯I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Σ |
|
|
|
i(Y I F |
|
|
|
|
Y I F |
|
). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20) |
132 |
Gabriel Lopes Cardoso |
It is possible to incorporate higher-curvature interactions involving the square of the Weyl tensor by including the Weyl multiplet into the function F , so that now F = F (Y, Υ ) subject to
F (λY, λ2Υ ) = λ2F (Y, Υ ). |
(21) |
Here Υ denotes the rescaled square of the auxiliary field Tab of the Weyl multiplet. The associated entropy function is then given by [5]
|
Y , Υ, U ) |
|
|
1 |
U Σ |
|
1 |
U N I J ( |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
K )( |
|
|
F |
|
|
L) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
= |
|
2 |
+ 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
I K P |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
E (Y, ¯ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QI − |
|
|
|
|
|
QJ − ¯J LP |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4i |
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
¯I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
− |
√ |
|
|
|
|
(Y I F |
|
− |
Y I F |
|
)(U |
− |
1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
−Υ |
|
¯Υ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
− |
− 2 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
Υ |
− |
|
|
− 2 |
|
|
|
+ 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i(F |
|
|
|
F |
|
) |
|
|
|
|
U Υ |
|
|
|
|
(U |
|
|
U |
1 |
|
|
) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
− |
8(1 + U ) |
|
|
−Υ |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22) |
||||||||||||
where now |
|
= F |
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
|
¯ |
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
¯ |
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
¯I |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I (Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Σ |
|
(Y, Y , Υ, Υ ) |
|
|
q |
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
Y I ) |
|
pI (F |
|
|
F |
). |
|
|
(23) |
||||||||||||||||
The quantity F (Y, ¯ |
|
¯ |
|
is defined by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Y , Υ, Υ ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¯I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− ¯ |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
F |
|
¯ |
¯ |
|
= − |
|
¯ |
|
|
I |
− |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
Υ |
¯Υ |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(Y, Y , Υ, Υ ) |
|
|
|
|
|
i |
Y I F |
|
|
|
|
Y I F |
|
|
|
2i |
|
Υ F |
|
|
Υ F |
|
, |
(24) |
where FΥ = ∂F /∂Υ . The entropy function (22) depends on the variables U = v1/v2, Υ and Y I . Their attractor values are determined by requiring E to be stationary. We refer to [5] for the detailed form of the associated attractor equations.
With the normalizations used in this section, the entropy (10) reads
Smacro(p, q) = 2π E |
attractor. |
(25) |
|
|
|
Supersymmetric black holes are the subset of extremal black holes satisfying [3]
QI = P J = 0, Υ = −64, U = 1. |
(26) |
The conditions QI = P J = 0 can also be obtained from a variational principle based on Σ [1, 4]. The entropy of supersymmetric black holes reads [2]
Smacro = π Σ |attractor. |
(27) |
It can be written as a Legendre transform [16], |
|
Smacro = π FE (p, φ) − qI φI , |
(28) |
where |
|
FE (p, φ) = 4Im F (Y, Υ = −64), |
(29) |