- •1. Introduction
- •2. Supersymmetry essentials
- •2.1. A new spacetime symmetry
- •2.2. Supersymmetry and the weak scale
- •2.3. The neutral supersymmetric spectrum
- •2.4. R-Parity
- •2.5. Supersymmetry breaking and dark energy
- •2.6. Minimal supergravity
- •2.7. Summary
- •3. Neutralino cosmology
- •3.1. Freeze out and wimPs
- •3.2. Thermal relic density
- •3.2.1. Bulk region
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Construction of trial functions
- •2.1. A new formulation of perturbative expansion
- •2.2. Trial function for the quantum double-well potential
- •3. Hierarchy theorem and its generalization
- •4. Asymmetric quartic double-well problem
- •4.1. Construction of the first trial function
- •4.2. Construction of the second trial function
- •4.3. Symmetric vs asymmetric potential
- •5. The n-dimensional problem
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The star product formalism
- •3. Geometric algebra and the Clifford star product
- •4. Geometric algebra and classical mechanics
- •5. Non-relativistic quantum mechanics
- •6. Spacetime algebra and Dirac theory
- •7. Conclusions
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Historical overview
- •1.2. Aims of this article
- •2. Random curves and lattice models
- •2.1. The Ising and percolation models
- •2.1.1. Exploration process
- •2.2. O (n) model
- •2.3. Potts model
- •2.4. Coulomb gas methods
- •2.4.1. Winding angle distribution
- •2.4.2. N-leg exponent
- •3.1. The postulates of sle
- •3.2. Loewner’s equation
- •3.3. Schramm–Loewner evolution
- •3.4. Simple properties of sle
- •3.4.1. Phases of sle
- •3.4.2. Sle duality
- •3.5. Special values of κ
- •3.5.1. Locality
- •3.5.2. Restriction
- •3.6. Radial sle and the winding angle
- •3.6.1. Identification with lattice models
- •4. Calculating with sle
- •4.1. Schramm’s formula
- •4.2. Crossing probability
- •4.3. Critical exponents from sle
- •4.3.1. The fractal dimension of sle
- •4.3.2. Crossing exponent
- •4.3.3. The one-arm exponent
- •5. Relation to conformal field theory
- •5.1. Basics of cft
- •5.2. Radial quantisation
- •5.3. Curves and states
- •5.4. Differential equations
- •5.4.1. Calogero–Sutherland model
- •6. Related ideas
- •6.1. Multiple slEs
- •6.2. Other variants of sle
- •6.3. Other growth models
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Acoustic force field
- •1.2. Primary axial acoustic force
- •1.3. Primary and secondary acoustic force
- •2. Application of Newton’s second law
- •3. Mathematical model
- •3.1. Preliminary analysis
- •4. Equation for particle trajectories
- •5. Concentration equation
- •6. Experimental procedure and results
- •6.1. SiC particle trajectories in an acoustic field
- •7. Comparison between experimental results and mathematical model
- •8. Summary and conclusions
6.2. Other variants of sle
So far we have discussed only chordal SLE, which describes curves connecting distinct points on the boundary of a simple connected domain, and radial SLE, in which the curve connects a boundary point to an interior point. Another simple variant is dipolar SLE [39], in which the curve is constrained to start at boundary point and to end on some finite segment of the boundary not containing the point. The canonical domain is an infinitely long strip, with the curve starting a point on one edge and ending on the other edge. This set-up allows the computation of several interesting physical quantities.
The study of SLE in multiply connected domains is very interesting. Their conformal classes are characterised by a set of moduli, which change as the curve grows. Friedrich and Kalkkinen [40] have argued that SLE in such a domain is characterised by diffusion in moduli space as well as diffusion on the boundary.
It is possible to rewrite the differential equations which arise from null state conditions in extended CFTs (for example super-conformal CFTs [41] and WZWN models [42]) in terms of the generators of stochastic conformal mappings which generalise that of Loewner. However, a physical interpretation in terms of the continuum limit of lattice curves appears so far to be missing.
6.3. Other growth models
SLE is in fact just one very special, solvable, example of an approach to growth processes in two dimensions using conformal mappings which has been around for a number of years. For a recent review see [43]. The prototypical problem of this type is diffusion-limited aggregation (DLA). In this model of cluster formation, particles of finite radius diffuse in, one by one, from infinity until they hit the existing cluster, where they stick. The probability of sticking at a given point is proportional to the local electric field, if we imagine the cluster as being charged. The resultant highly branched structures are very similar to those observed in smoke particles, and in viscous fingering experiments where one fluid is forced into another in which it is immiscible. Hastings and Levitov [44] proposed an approach to this problem using conformal mappings. At each time t, the boundary of the cluster is described by the conformal mapping ft (z) which takes it to the unit disc. The cluster is grown by adding a small semicircular piece to the boundary. The way this changes ft is well known according to a theorem of Hadamard. The difficulty is that the probability of adding this piece at a given point depends on the local electric field which itself depends on . The equation of motion for ft is therefore more complicated than in SLE. Moreover, it may be shown that almost all initially smooth boundary curves evolve towards a finite-time singularity: this is thought to be responsible for branching, but just at this point the equations must be regularised to reflect the finite size of the particles (or, in viscous fingering, the effects of finite surface tension.)
It is also possible to generate branching structures by making the driving term at in Loewner’s equation discontinuous, for example taking it to be a Levy process. Unfortunately this does not appear to describe a physically interesting model.
Finally, Hastings [45] has proposed two related growth models which each lead, in the continuum limit, to SLE. These are very similar to DLA, except that growth is only allowed at the tip. The first, called the arbitrary Laplacian random walk, takes place on the lattice. The tip moves to one of the neighbouring unoccupied sites r with relative probability E (r)η, where E (r) is the lattice electric field, that is the potential difference between the tip and r, and η is a parameter. The second growth model takes place in the continuum via iterated conformal mappings, in which pieces of length ℓ1 are added to the tip, but shifted to the left or right relative to the previous growth direction by a random amount ±ℓ2. This model depends on the ratio ℓ2/ℓ1, and leads, in the continuum limit, to SLEκ with κ = ℓ2/4ℓ1. For the lattice model there is no universal relation between κ and η, except for η = 1, which is the same as the loop-erased random walk (Section 2.2) and converges to SLE2.
Mathematical modeling of the movement of suspended particles subjected to acoustic and flow fields
N. Aboobakera, D. Blackmoreb and J. Meegodac, , aBureau of Research, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, NJ, USA bDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA cDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA Received 1 July 2002; revised 1 August 2004; accepted 6 September 2004. Available online 1 December 2004.
Abstract
When particles are subjected to an acoustic field particle trajectories depend on the particle and fluid compressibility and density values. Hence a combination of acoustic and flow fields on particles can be used to deflect and trap, or to segregate and/or fractionate fine particles in fluid suspensions. Using particle physics in an acoustic field, a mathematical model was developed to calculate trajectories of deflected particles due to the application of acoustic standing waves. The resulting second order ordinary differential equation was quite stiff and hence difficult to solve numerically and did not have a closed form solution. The analysis of the above equation showed that the basic problems with numerical solutions could not be ameliorated through the use of standard rescaling techniques. A combination of phase space and asymptotic analysis turns out to be far more useful in obtaining approximate solutions. An approximate solution was derived which enabled the calculation of the particle trajectories and concentration at collection planes in the acoustic field. Analysis of the solution showed that all the particles move toward the pressure node to which the particles are supposed to move. Particles with 2 μm diameter took approximately 20 s to reach that node. Then at the bench scale, the above technology was implemented by building a flow chamber with two transducers at opposite ends to generate an acoustic standing wave. SiC particle trajectories were tracked using captured digital images from a high-resolution microscope. The displacements of SiC particles due to an acoustic force were compared with the mathematical model predictions. For input power levels between 3.0 and 5.0 W, the experimental data were comparable to mathematical model predictions. Hence it was concluded that the proposed approximate solution was both quantitatively and qualitatively closer to experimental results than the simplified form ignoring the second order term reported in the literature.
Keywords: Standing wave; Segregation; Fractionation; Acoustic field; Mathematical model; Particle trajectories; Approximate solution; Silicon carbide
Article Outline
1. Introduction
1.1. Acoustic force field
1.2. Primary axial acoustic force
1.3. Primary and secondary acoustic force
2. Application of Newton’s second law
3. Mathematical model
3.1. Preliminary analysis
4. Equation for particle trajectories
5. Concentration equation
6. Experimental procedure and results
6.1. SiC particle trajectories in an acoustic field
7. Comparison between experimental results and mathematical model
8. Summary and conclusions
Acknowledgements
References