- •1. Introduction
- •2. Supersymmetry essentials
- •2.1. A new spacetime symmetry
- •2.2. Supersymmetry and the weak scale
- •2.3. The neutral supersymmetric spectrum
- •2.4. R-Parity
- •2.5. Supersymmetry breaking and dark energy
- •2.6. Minimal supergravity
- •2.7. Summary
- •3. Neutralino cosmology
- •3.1. Freeze out and wimPs
- •3.2. Thermal relic density
- •3.2.1. Bulk region
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Construction of trial functions
- •2.1. A new formulation of perturbative expansion
- •2.2. Trial function for the quantum double-well potential
- •3. Hierarchy theorem and its generalization
- •4. Asymmetric quartic double-well problem
- •4.1. Construction of the first trial function
- •4.2. Construction of the second trial function
- •4.3. Symmetric vs asymmetric potential
- •5. The n-dimensional problem
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The star product formalism
- •3. Geometric algebra and the Clifford star product
- •4. Geometric algebra and classical mechanics
- •5. Non-relativistic quantum mechanics
- •6. Spacetime algebra and Dirac theory
- •7. Conclusions
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Historical overview
- •1.2. Aims of this article
- •2. Random curves and lattice models
- •2.1. The Ising and percolation models
- •2.1.1. Exploration process
- •2.2. O (n) model
- •2.3. Potts model
- •2.4. Coulomb gas methods
- •2.4.1. Winding angle distribution
- •2.4.2. N-leg exponent
- •3.1. The postulates of sle
- •3.2. Loewner’s equation
- •3.3. Schramm–Loewner evolution
- •3.4. Simple properties of sle
- •3.4.1. Phases of sle
- •3.4.2. Sle duality
- •3.5. Special values of κ
- •3.5.1. Locality
- •3.5.2. Restriction
- •3.6. Radial sle and the winding angle
- •3.6.1. Identification with lattice models
- •4. Calculating with sle
- •4.1. Schramm’s formula
- •4.2. Crossing probability
- •4.3. Critical exponents from sle
- •4.3.1. The fractal dimension of sle
- •4.3.2. Crossing exponent
- •4.3.3. The one-arm exponent
- •5. Relation to conformal field theory
- •5.1. Basics of cft
- •5.2. Radial quantisation
- •5.3. Curves and states
- •5.4. Differential equations
- •5.4.1. Calogero–Sutherland model
- •6. Related ideas
- •6.1. Multiple slEs
- •6.2. Other variants of sle
- •6.3. Other growth models
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Acoustic force field
- •1.2. Primary axial acoustic force
- •1.3. Primary and secondary acoustic force
- •2. Application of Newton’s second law
- •3. Mathematical model
- •3.1. Preliminary analysis
- •4. Equation for particle trajectories
- •5. Concentration equation
- •6. Experimental procedure and results
- •6.1. SiC particle trajectories in an acoustic field
- •7. Comparison between experimental results and mathematical model
- •8. Summary and conclusions
3.6.1. Identification with lattice models
This result allows use to make a tentative identification with the various realisations of the O (n) model described in Section 2.2. We have, using (27), n = −2 cos(4π/κ) with 2 κ 4 describing the critical point at xc, and 4 < κ 8 corresponding to the dense phase. Some important special cases are therefore:
• κ = −2: loop-erased random walks (proven in [24]);
• κ = 8/3: self-avoiding walks, as already suggested by the restriction property, Section 3.5.2; unproven, but see [22] for many consequences;
• κ = 3: cluster boundaries in the Ising model, however, as yet unproven;
• κ = 4: BCSOS model of roughening transition (equivalent to the 4-state Potts model and the double dimer model), as yet unproven; also certain level lines of a gaussian random field and the ‘harmonic explorer’ (proven in [23]); also believed to be dual to the Kosterlitz–Thouless transition in the XY model;
• κ = 6: cluster boundaries in percolation (proven in [7]);
• κ = 8: dense phase of self-avoiding walks; boundaries of uniform spanning trees (proven in [24]).
It should be noted that no lattice candidates for κ > 8, or for the dual values κ < 2, have been proposed. This possibly has to do with the fact that, for κ > 8, the SLE trace is not reversible: the law on curves from r1 to r2 is not the same as the law obtained by interchanging the points. Evidently, curves in equilibrium lattice models should satisfy reversibility.
4. Calculating with sle
SLE shows that the measure on the continuum limit of single curves in various lattice models is given in terms of one-dimensional Brownian motion. However, it is not at all clear how thereby to deduce interesting physical consequences. We first describe two relatively simple computations in two-dimensional percolation which can be done using SLE.
4.1. Schramm’s formula
Given a curve γ connecting two points r1 and r2 on the boundary of a domain , what is the probability that it passes to the left of a given interior point? This is not a question which is natural in conventional approaches to critical behaviour, but which is very simply answered within SLE [25].
As usual, we can consider to be the upper half plane, and take r1 = a0 and r2 to be at infinity. The curve is then described by chordal SLE starting at a0. Label the interior point by the complex number ζ.
Denote the probability that γ passes to the left of ζ by (we include the dependence on to emphasise the fact that this is a not a holomorphic function). Consider evolving the SLE for an infinitesimal time dt. The function gdt will map the remainder of γ into its image γ′, which, however, by lk and lk, will have the same measure as SLE started from . At the same time, ζ → gdt (ζ) = ζ + 2dt/(ζ − a0). Moreover, γ′ lies to the left of ζ′ iff γ lies to the left of ζ. Therefore
(28) |
where the average … is over all realisations of Brownian motion dBt up to time dt. Taylor expanding, using dBt = 0 and (dBt)2 = dt, and equating the coefficient of dt to zero gives
(29) |
Thus, P satisfies a linear second-order partial differential equation, typical of conditional probabilities in stochastic differential equations.
By scale invariance P in fact depends only on the angle θ subtended between ζ − a0 and the real axis. Thus, (29) reduces to an ordinary second-order linear differential equation, which is in fact hypergeometric. The boundary conditions are that P = 0 and 1 when θ = π and 0, respectively, which gives (specialising to κ = 6)
(30) |
Note that this may also be written in terms of a single quadrature since one solution of (29) is P = const.