- •1. Introduction
- •2. Supersymmetry essentials
- •2.1. A new spacetime symmetry
- •2.2. Supersymmetry and the weak scale
- •2.3. The neutral supersymmetric spectrum
- •2.4. R-Parity
- •2.5. Supersymmetry breaking and dark energy
- •2.6. Minimal supergravity
- •2.7. Summary
- •3. Neutralino cosmology
- •3.1. Freeze out and wimPs
- •3.2. Thermal relic density
- •3.2.1. Bulk region
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Construction of trial functions
- •2.1. A new formulation of perturbative expansion
- •2.2. Trial function for the quantum double-well potential
- •3. Hierarchy theorem and its generalization
- •4. Asymmetric quartic double-well problem
- •4.1. Construction of the first trial function
- •4.2. Construction of the second trial function
- •4.3. Symmetric vs asymmetric potential
- •5. The n-dimensional problem
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The star product formalism
- •3. Geometric algebra and the Clifford star product
- •4. Geometric algebra and classical mechanics
- •5. Non-relativistic quantum mechanics
- •6. Spacetime algebra and Dirac theory
- •7. Conclusions
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Historical overview
- •1.2. Aims of this article
- •2. Random curves and lattice models
- •2.1. The Ising and percolation models
- •2.1.1. Exploration process
- •2.2. O (n) model
- •2.3. Potts model
- •2.4. Coulomb gas methods
- •2.4.1. Winding angle distribution
- •2.4.2. N-leg exponent
- •3.1. The postulates of sle
- •3.2. Loewner’s equation
- •3.3. Schramm–Loewner evolution
- •3.4. Simple properties of sle
- •3.4.1. Phases of sle
- •3.4.2. Sle duality
- •3.5. Special values of κ
- •3.5.1. Locality
- •3.5.2. Restriction
- •3.6. Radial sle and the winding angle
- •3.6.1. Identification with lattice models
- •4. Calculating with sle
- •4.1. Schramm’s formula
- •4.2. Crossing probability
- •4.3. Critical exponents from sle
- •4.3.1. The fractal dimension of sle
- •4.3.2. Crossing exponent
- •4.3.3. The one-arm exponent
- •5. Relation to conformal field theory
- •5.1. Basics of cft
- •5.2. Radial quantisation
- •5.3. Curves and states
- •5.4. Differential equations
- •5.4.1. Calogero–Sutherland model
- •6. Related ideas
- •6.1. Multiple slEs
- •6.2. Other variants of sle
- •6.3. Other growth models
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Acoustic force field
- •1.2. Primary axial acoustic force
- •1.3. Primary and secondary acoustic force
- •2. Application of Newton’s second law
- •3. Mathematical model
- •3.1. Preliminary analysis
- •4. Equation for particle trajectories
- •5. Concentration equation
- •6. Experimental procedure and results
- •6.1. SiC particle trajectories in an acoustic field
- •7. Comparison between experimental results and mathematical model
- •8. Summary and conclusions
2. Application of Newton’s second law
The proposed technology can be implemented in a rectangular narrow channel of upward fluid flow. Two walls of the channel can be made with a piezoelectric transducer and rigid reflecting surface, as shown in Fig. 2. When the transducer is energized at the proper frequency to maintain a resonant acoustic field, there will be a pressure node located on the mid-plane of the chamber, and pressure antinodes located on the chamber walls. The acoustic force on a suspended particle results from the particle–fluid interaction that arises when the particle and suspending fluid have different acoustic properties. When the particle is at the pressure node at quarter wavelength, mid-plane of the chamber width, the magnitude of this force is the maximum. For a dilute suspension, the secondary radiation forces, the body forces and the hydrodynamic interactions are neglected. The rate of change of particle momentum is equal to:
(ρpV0+0.5ρfV0)dv/dt=FPARF+FPTRF+V0(ρp-ρf)g+FD, |
(3) |
mva=FPARF+FPTRF+V0(ρp-ρf)g+FD, |
(4) |
where v is the particle velocity and g is the gravitational acceleration. The mass in the momentum term is the “virtual mass” of the particle, m. Since the particle’s velocity is v, the drag force is given by Stokes’ law (FD = −6πμrv), where μ is the viscosity of the fluid and r is the radius of the particle in suspension. The summation of the forces in the direction of the acoustic wave propagation gives:
Fac=FPARF=mva+6πμrv=V0EackGsin(2kx). |
(5) |
Thus the acoustic force, Fac, on a particle in an acoustic field is due to the primary axial radiation force and can be used to calculate the particle trajectories.
Fig. 2. Schematic showing the mechanics of the proposed technology.
3. Mathematical model
In this research fractionation of particles is based on density and compressibility differences of fluid and particles rather than on particle size. Employing the above basic principles of physics of particles in an acoustic field, a mathematical model is developed to calculate trajectories of deflected particles subjected to acoustic standing waves. Table 1 gives the properties of the particles and the fluid that are used in this research.
Table 1.
Properties of particles and suspending medium
Description |
Solid (SiC) |
Medium (DI water) |
Density (ρ) (kg/m3) |
3217 |
1000 |
Frequency of sound in medium (f) (kHz) |
– |
333 |
Viscosity of medium (μ) (N s/μm2) |
– |
9.98E−16 |
Acoustic energy in medium (J/m3) |
– |
133 |
Power in medium (W/m3) |
– |
56 000 |
Quality factor (Q) of chamber |
– |
5000 |
Rearranging Eqs. Figs. (3) and (5) yields the following equation:
(6) |
Simplifying Eq. (6) with values in Table 1 yields:
x″+cx′-ksinβx=0, |
(7) |
where
x′=ν, |
(8) |
where, c = 1.42E6, k = E8, and β = 2.78E−3 are constants representing the physical parameters of Eq. (7). This equation will be constantly used during the mathematical derivation. The notation (′) indicates the derivative, d/dt, and x is the position of the migrating particle in the x-direction between a transducer and a reflector separated by one half wavelength (=λ/2) of the resonant sound at the given frequency. The parameters c, k, and β are all positive constants having the following orders (O) of magnitude: c = O(106), k = O(108), β = O(10−3).
A study of the behavior of the solutions is discussed with an explanation of the available solution techniques. Solutions of Eq. (7) will be used as a basis for concluding some results during the derivation. The above equation is extremely stiff, so most numerical solution methods—even stiff equation solvers—provide little useful information.
Note that Eq. (7) has the form somewhat like a damped nonlinear spring (or pendulum) equation. Several publications cited in the literature assumed instantaneous viscous relaxation where the inertial term dv/dt or x″ was neglected. This type of singular perturbation approximation; namely:
cx′-ksinβx=0 |
(9) |
has been used to approximate the solution for Eq. (7). It will be shown in this paper that although this approximation produces results that are qualitatively correct, quantitative errors are incurred that can be significant for some applications.