- •1. Introduction
- •2. Supersymmetry essentials
- •2.1. A new spacetime symmetry
- •2.2. Supersymmetry and the weak scale
- •2.3. The neutral supersymmetric spectrum
- •2.4. R-Parity
- •2.5. Supersymmetry breaking and dark energy
- •2.6. Minimal supergravity
- •2.7. Summary
- •3. Neutralino cosmology
- •3.1. Freeze out and wimPs
- •3.2. Thermal relic density
- •3.2.1. Bulk region
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Construction of trial functions
- •2.1. A new formulation of perturbative expansion
- •2.2. Trial function for the quantum double-well potential
- •3. Hierarchy theorem and its generalization
- •4. Asymmetric quartic double-well problem
- •4.1. Construction of the first trial function
- •4.2. Construction of the second trial function
- •4.3. Symmetric vs asymmetric potential
- •5. The n-dimensional problem
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The star product formalism
- •3. Geometric algebra and the Clifford star product
- •4. Geometric algebra and classical mechanics
- •5. Non-relativistic quantum mechanics
- •6. Spacetime algebra and Dirac theory
- •7. Conclusions
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Historical overview
- •1.2. Aims of this article
- •2. Random curves and lattice models
- •2.1. The Ising and percolation models
- •2.1.1. Exploration process
- •2.2. O (n) model
- •2.3. Potts model
- •2.4. Coulomb gas methods
- •2.4.1. Winding angle distribution
- •2.4.2. N-leg exponent
- •3.1. The postulates of sle
- •3.2. Loewner’s equation
- •3.3. Schramm–Loewner evolution
- •3.4. Simple properties of sle
- •3.4.1. Phases of sle
- •3.4.2. Sle duality
- •3.5. Special values of κ
- •3.5.1. Locality
- •3.5.2. Restriction
- •3.6. Radial sle and the winding angle
- •3.6.1. Identification with lattice models
- •4. Calculating with sle
- •4.1. Schramm’s formula
- •4.2. Crossing probability
- •4.3. Critical exponents from sle
- •4.3.1. The fractal dimension of sle
- •4.3.2. Crossing exponent
- •4.3.3. The one-arm exponent
- •5. Relation to conformal field theory
- •5.1. Basics of cft
- •5.2. Radial quantisation
- •5.3. Curves and states
- •5.4. Differential equations
- •5.4.1. Calogero–Sutherland model
- •6. Related ideas
- •6.1. Multiple slEs
- •6.2. Other variants of sle
- •6.3. Other growth models
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Acoustic force field
- •1.2. Primary axial acoustic force
- •1.3. Primary and secondary acoustic force
- •2. Application of Newton’s second law
- •3. Mathematical model
- •3.1. Preliminary analysis
- •4. Equation for particle trajectories
- •5. Concentration equation
- •6. Experimental procedure and results
- •6.1. SiC particle trajectories in an acoustic field
- •7. Comparison between experimental results and mathematical model
- •8. Summary and conclusions
4.2. Crossing probability
Given a critical percolation problem inside a simply connected domain , what is the probability that a cluster connects two disjoint segments AB and CD of the boundary? This problem was conjectured to be conformally invariant and (probably) first studied numerically in [26]. A formula based on CFT as well as a certain amount of guesswork was conjectured in [1]. It was proved, for the continuum limit of site percolation on the triangular lattice, by Smirnov [7].
Within SLE, it takes a certain amount of ingenuity [5] to relate this problem to a question about a single curve. As usual, let be the upper half plane. It is always possible to make a fractional linear conformal mapping which takes AB into (−∞, x1) and CD into (0, x2), where x1 < 0 and x2 > 0. Now go back to the lattice picture and consider critical site percolation on the triangular lattice in the upper half plane, so that each site is independently coloured black or white with equal probabilities 1/2. Choose all the boundary sites on the positive real axis to be white, all those on the negative real axis to be black (see Fig. 8). There is a cluster boundary starting at the origin, which, in the continuum limit, will be described by SLE6. Since κ > 4, it repeatedly hits the real axis, both to the L and R of the origin. Eventually every point on the real axis is swallowed. Either x1 is swallowed before x2, or vice versa.
(9K)
Fig. 8. Is there a crossing on the white discs from (0, x2) to (−∞, x1)? This happens if and only if x1 gets swallowed by the SLE before x2.
Note that every site on the L of the curve is black, and every site on its R is white. Suppose that x1 is swallowed before x2. Then, at the moment it is swallowed, there exists a continuous path on the white sites, just to the R of the curve, which connects (0, x2) to the row just above (−∞, x1). On the other hand, if x2 is swallowed before x1, there exists a continuous path on the black sites, just to the L of the curve, connecting 0− to a point on the real axis to the R of x2. This path forms a barrier (as in the game of Hex) to the possibility of a white crossing from (0, x2) to (−∞, x1). Hence there is such a crossing if and only if x1 is swallowed before x2 by the SLE curve.
Recall that in Section 3.4.1 we related the swallowing of a point x0 on the real axis to the vanishing of xt = gt (xt) − at, which undergoes a Bessel process on the real line. Therefore
(31) |
Denote this by P (x1, x2). By generalising the SLE to start at a0 rather than 0, we can write a differential equation for this in similar manner to (29)
(32) |
Translational invariance implies that we can replace ∂a0 by -(∂x1+∂x2). Finally, P can in fact depend only on the ratio η = (x2 − a0)/(a0 − x1), which again reduces the equation to hypergeometric form. The solution is (specialising to κ = 6 for percolation)
(33) |
It should be mentioned that this is but one of a number of percolation crossing formulae. Another, conjectured by Watts [27], for the probability that there is cluster which simultaneously connects AB to CD and BC to DA, has since been proved by Dubédat [28]. However, other formulae, for example for the mean number of distinct clusters connecting AB and CD [29], and for the probability that exactly N distinct clusters cross an annulus [30], are as yet unproven using SLE methods.