Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1232_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Treatment
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Subareolar Duct Excision
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •2: Abnormal Mammogram
- •Concept
- •Full History
- •Full Physical Examination
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Excisional Biopsy
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •1: Nipple Discharge
- •Concept
- •Oral Board Scenario
- •Full History
- •Full Physical Examination
- •3: Breast Mass
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Imaging
- •Diagnosis
- •Breast Cyst
- •Fibroadenoma
- •Phyllodes Tumor
- •Breast Cancer
- •Clinical Staging
- •Surgical Management
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Breast Imaging
- •Breast Biopsy
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •5: High Risk Lesions
- •Concept
- •Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH)
- •Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia (ALH)
- •Clean Kills
- •6: Inflammatory Breast Cancer
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •Concept
- •History
- •Physical Exam
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Staging
- •Treatment
- •Surgery
- •Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery
- •Chemotherapy/Trastuzumab/Hormonal Therapy
- •Radiotherapy
- •Other Considerations
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •8: Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer
- •Risks
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma
- •9: Hereditary Breast Cancer (BRCA1/2)
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •10: Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
- •Concept
- •Oral Board Scenario
- •History
- •Physical
- •Diagnostic Imaging
- •Labs
- •Tissue Diagnosis
- •Multidisciplinary Conference/Tumor Board
- •Treatment
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •11: Metastatic Breast Cancer
- •Metastatic Breast Cancer
- •Concept
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •History
- •Physical
- •Work-Up
- •Treatment
- •Bibliography
- •13: Mesenteric Ischemia
- •Full History
- •Medical Comorbidities
- •Full Physical Examination
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Management
- •Acute SMA Embolism
- •Acute SMA Thrombosis
- •Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •14: Hemorrhoids
- •Hemorrhoids
- •Operative Management
- •Special Scenarios
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •Diagnostic Testing
- •Additional Testing
- •15: Colonic Volvulus
- •Colonic Volvulus
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •16: Rectal Prolapse
- •Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier Procedure)
- •Transabdominal Rectopexy
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •17: Appendiceal Cancer
- •Epithelial Lesions
- •Mixed Lesions
- •Non-epithelial Lesions
- •Appendiceal Carcinoid Tumors
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •18: Small Bowel Obstruction
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Malignancy
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •19: Mesenteric Volvulus
- •Concept
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •20: Meckel’s Diverticulum
- •Meckel’s Diverticulum
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •21: Colon Cancer
- •Colon Cancer
- •Lynch Syndrome/HNPCC
- •Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) Syndrome
- •Malignant Bowel Obstruction
- •Perforated Lesions
- •Adjuvant Treatment
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •22: Enterocutaneous Fistulas
- •Introduction
- •Initial Management
- •Skin Care
- •Nutrition
- •Infection/Sepsis Control
- •Operative Timing
- •Operative Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •Bibliography
- •23: Diverticulitis
- •Concept
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •24: Adult Appendicitis
- •Concept
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •25: Large Bowel Obstruction
- •Concept
- •Initial Management
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •26: Intussusception
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •27: Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
- •Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
- •Evaluation
- •Surgery
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •28: Peri-Rectal Abscess
- •Perianal Abscess
- •Ischioanal Abscess
- •Intersphincteric Abscess
- •Supralevator Abscess
- •Horseshoe Abscess
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •29: Rectal Cancer
- •Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT)
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •30: Right Lower Quadrant Pain
- •Acute Appendicitis
- •Treatment
- •Key Technical Steps
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •31: Crohn’s Disease
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •32: Ulcerative Colitis
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Medically Refractory Ulcerative Colitis/Fulminant Colitis
- •Concept
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •33: Zenker’s Diverticulum
- •Concept
- •Treatment Options
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •34: Achalasia
- •Achalasia
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Bonus Points
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •35: Barrett’s Esophagus
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •36: Esophageal Cancer
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •37: Esophageal Perforation
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •38: Esophageal Varices
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •39: Adult Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •40: Duodenal Cancer
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •41: Gastric Outlet Obstruction
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •42: Duodenal Stump Complications
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •43: Cholecystoduodenal Fistula
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •44: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •45: Duodenal Ulcers
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •46: Gastric Cancer
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Staging
- •Treatment
- •Post-operative Complications
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •Concept
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Calculating Nutritional Needs
- •Timing
- •Enteral Nutrition
- •Nonsurgical Enteral Access
- •Surgical Enteral Access
- •Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •Etiology
- •Exam
- •Work Up
- •Medical Management
- •Surgical/Procedural Management
- •Follow-Up
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •49: Dieulafoy Lesions
- •Overview
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •50: Gallstone Ileus
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •51: Choledochal Cyst
- •Concept
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •52: Choledocholithiasis
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •53: Bile Leak
- •Concept
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •54: Bile Duct Injury
- •Concept
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •55: Liver Abscess
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •56: Acute Cholecystitis
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •57: Cirrhosis
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •58: Gallbladder Cancer
- •Concept
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •59: Postcholecystectomy Syndrome
- •Concept
- •Treatment Options
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •60: Mirizzi Syndrome
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •61: Acute Pancreatitis
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •62: Chronic Pancreatitis
- •Surgical Procedure
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •63: Pancreatic Cancer
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Surgical complications
- •Clean Kills
- •64: Pancreatic Pseudocysts
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •65: Carcinoid Tumors
- •Introduction
- •Bonus Points
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •Further Reading
- •66: Cushing’s Syndrome
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •67: Pheochromocytoma
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •68: Gastrinoma
- •Management
- •Postoperative Considerations
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •69: Primary Hyperaldosteronism
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •70: Insulinoma
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •71: Hyperthyroidism
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •72: Neck Mass
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •73: Hyperparathyroidism
- •Procedure
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •74: Thyroid Nodule
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Postoperative Cancer Treatment
- •Surveillance
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •75: Renal Artery Stenosis
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •76: Kidney Stones
- •Concept
- •Alternate Scenario
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •77: Testicular Mass
- •Concept
- •Alternate Scenario
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •78: Groin Hernias
- •Inguinal Hernia
- •Concept
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Femoral Hernia
- •Concept
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Obturator Hernia
- •Bibliography
- •79: Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •80: Ventral Hernia
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •Curveballs
- •Complications
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •82: Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •83: Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS)
- •Concept
- •An Alternate Presenting Scenario
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •Further Reading
- •84: Colon Trauma
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •Further Reading
- •85: Rectal Trauma
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •86: Extremity Compartment Syndrome
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •87: Duodenal Trauma
- •Duodenal Injury Grading
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Further Reading
- •88: Genitourinary Trauma
- •Urethral Injury Grading
- •How to Answer?
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •89: Liver Trauma
- •Management Options
- •Surgical Management
- •Operative Hemostatic Techniques
- •Post-operative Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •90: Pelvic Fractures
- •Common Curve Balls
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •91: Rib Fractures
- •Work Up
- •Non-Surgical Treatment
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Geriatric Population Considerations
- •92: Penetrating Neck Trauma
- •Concept
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •93: Venous Thromboembolism
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Further Reading
- •94: Splenic Trauma
- •Concept
- •History (AMPLE)
- •Physical Examination
- •Labs/Tests
- •Resuscitation
- •Mechanism Considerations
- •Operative Management
- •Non-operative Management
- •Vaccinations
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •95: Nutrition
- •Chronic Malnutrition, Outpatient
- •Chronic Malnutrition, Inpatient
- •Refeeding Syndrome
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •96: Thoracic Trauma
- •Management
- •Curve Balls
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •98: Damage Control Surgery
- •Concept
- •Initial Evaluation
- •Early Decision-Making
- •Damage Control Surgery
- •Initial Phase
- •Resuscitative Phase
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •99: Burns
- •Concept
- •Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •100: Burn Escharotomy
- •Burn Escharotomy
- •Concept
- •Common Curve Balls
- •Clean Kills
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •101: Burn Sepsis
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •102: Cardiac Trauma
- •Penetrating Cardiac Injury
- •Concept
- •Initial Evaluation
- •Treatment
- •Blunt Cardiac Injury
- •Concept
- •Initial Evaluation
- •Additional Workup
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •103: Multiple Injuries/Trauma Priorities
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •104: Intracranial Hemorrhage (Traumatic Brain Injury)
- •Concept
- •Calculate GCS
- •Physical Exam
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •105: Diaphragmatic Injuries
- •Concept
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •106: Emergency Airway
- •Concept
- •Blunt Trauma
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Penetrating Trauma
- •Cricothyroidotomy
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Angioedema
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •Concept
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bonus Information
- •Basic Ventilator Modes
- •Bibliography
- •108: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •109: Empyema
- •Treatment
- •Surgical Management
- •Chronic Empyema
- •Post-resectional Empyema
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •110: Lung Nodule/Lung Cancer
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •111: Bleeding After Gastric Bypass
- •Treatment
- •Surgical Management
- •Bonus Points
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •Erosion
- •Slippage/Prolapse
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •113: Bariatric Surgery Complications
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •114: Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •115: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •116: Vascular: Chronic Lower Extremity Ischemia
- •Management
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •117: Acute Extremity Ischemia
- •Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •118: Carotid Stenosis
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •119: Visceral Artery Aneurysms
- •Surgical Management
- •Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •120: Deep Vein Thrombosis
- •Clinical Scenario 1
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •GERD
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •122: Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis
- •Pyloric Stenosis
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •123: Pediatric Inguinal Hernia
- •Inguinal Hernia
- •Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •124: Pediatric Appendicitis
- •Acute Appendicitis
- •Perforated Appendicitis
- •Perforated Appendicitis, Interval Appendectomy
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •125: Tracheoesophageal Fistula
- •Concept
- •Tracheoesophageal Fistula
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •126: Postoperative Hypotension
- •Postoperative Hypotension
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •127: Postoperative Fever
- •Bonus Points
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •128: Postoperative Myocardial Infarction
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •129: Air Embolism
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •130: Perioperative Care: Recent Myocardial Infarction
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •131: Acute Kidney Injury
- •Bonus Points
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •132: Intraoperative Complications: Hemorrhage
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •133: Trocar Injury
- •Bonus Points
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •Surgical Management
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •135: Melanoma (Thin)
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •136: Melanoma (Thick)
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •137: Sarcoma
- •Introduction
- •Bonus Points
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •138: Skin Cancer (Squamous Cell Cancer)
- •Brief H+P
- •Treatment
- •Follow-Up
- •Bonus
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •139: Basal Cell Carcinoma
- •Introduction
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •140: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •141: Wound Dehiscence
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Enterocutaneous Fistula
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Summary
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •142: Surgical Site Infections
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bibliography
- •Bibliography
- •144: Futile Care
- •Concept
- •Treatment
- •Common Curveballs
- •Clean Kills
- •Bonus Points
- •Bibliography
- •145: Conclusion
- •Index

492
H. A. Bhatti and L. L. Perea
• Hematoma/seroma formation
– Acute uid collections, such as hematoma or seroma,
place physical stress on the incision which may result
in dehiscence.
• Poor surgical technique
– Early wound dehiscence dened as up to days 5–8
from surgery is often attributed to poor surgical technique. For fascial closure, the STITCH trial showed
the rate of incisional hernia was signicantly lower in
patients receiving small bites versus large bites.
• Excessive tension
– A core general surgery principle is to always avoid ten-
sion when bringing two tissues together for an anastomosis whether it may be intestinal or wound edges; the
same concept applies.
History Should Also Focus on Symptoms, Being Sure to
Rule Out Other Possibilities:
• Fascial dehiscence
• Necrotizing soft tissue infection
• Cellulitis
• Abscess
• Intestinal stula
Physical Examination
• Check vital signs and systemic signs including fever.
• Look for peritoneal signs (guarding, rebound).
• Examine wound edges which may be separated; evaluate
for discharge or pus or erythema.
• Evaluate for fascial integrity.
• Activity modication: Advise patient to avoid heavy lifting and strenuous exercise that can place stress on the
wound.
• Follow-up: Schedule a follow-up clinic visit in 5 days to
reassess wound healing progress, review culture results,
and make further management decisions.
Common Curveballs
• Palpable uctuant mass indicating abscess
– Requires further treatment with incision and
drainage
• Feculent drainage from wound suggesting stula
– Consider cross-sectional imaging for further charac-
terization; then proceed with stula management.
• Fascial defect indicating deep wound dehiscence
– May require local care versus revision surgery depend-
ing on size, patient symptoms, and clinical status
Clean Kills
• Not ruling out or evaluating for deeper infections
• Not recognizing difference between incisional versus fascial dehiscence
• Returning to the operating room for supercial wound
infection, i.e., cellulitis
Summary
Diagnostic Tests
• Wound dehiscence normally diagnosed on clinical presentation and examination.
• Complete blood count (CBC).
• Wound culture.
• Ultrasound to assess for collections.
• Computerized tomography (CT) is not needed unless
deeper infection is suspected.
Treatment
• Local wound care: Emphasize importance of maintaining
wound hygiene; instruct patient to gently cleanse wound
and pat dry.
• Antibiotics: Initiate empiric antibiotics with evidence of
cellulitis to cover potential bacterial colonization at the
wound site until the culture results are available.
• Dressings: Apply sterile, non-adherent dressings to minimize friction and promote a moist wound environment
which can enhance healing.
Based on the clinical presentation and examination, this
patient is diagnosed with supercial wound dehiscence.
Supercial wound dehiscence refers to the partial or
complete separation of the outer layers of a surgical
wound, often involving skin and subcutaneous tissue
without involvement of deeper structures. Incisional
wound dehiscence can be treated with local wound care
with interval follow-up.
Fascial Dehiscence withEvisceration
ofBowel
Concept
In contrast to supercial wound dehiscence, patients may
present emergently to the emergency room in acute distress
several days after open abdominal surgery. Presentation
and exam will guide and necessitate operative
intervention.

141 Wound Dehiscence
493
Way Question May BeAsked?
“A 62-year-old female returns urgently to the emergency
room with complaints of sudden and severe abdominal pain
accompanied by protrusion of bowel through an open
abdominal wound. She has a history of diverticular disease
and underwent emergent Hartmann’s procedure 5 days ago
due to perforated sigmoid colon.”
This case is presenting a patient in extremis after a
Hartmann’s procedure with descriptions of bowel emanating
from wound signifying evisceration.
How toAnswer?
History (See Previous Case for Details)
• Diabetes mellitus
• Obesity
• Hypertension
• Malnutrition
• Immunocompromised
• Infection
• Advanced age
• Corticosteroid use
• Tobacco use
• Hematoma/seroma formation
• Poor surgical technique
• Excessive tension
History Should Also Focus on Symptoms, Being Sure to
Rule Out Other Possibilities:
• Supercial wound dehiscence
• Necrotizing soft tissue infection
• Cellulitis
• Abscess
• Intestinal stula
Physical Examination
• Check vital signs and systemic signs including fever.
• Look for peritoneal signs (guarding, rebound).
• Examine incisional wound which will demonstrate widened edges usually >5 cm at site of prior surgery with
evisceration of bowel loops. Exposed bowel may be
edematous and congested.
Diagnostic Tests
• Fascial dehiscence with bowel evisceration is diagnosed
on history and physical examination.
• Arterial blood gas (ABG) can indicate early evidence of
metabolic acidosis and guide resuscitation efforts.
• Complete blood count (CBC) can indicate leukocytosis
which may be reactive or infectious if a deep space infection is present.
• Computerized tomography (CT) is not required when
there is evidence of bowel evisceration.
Treatment
• Stabilization of patient: Intravenous uids, broadspectrum antibiotics, and emergent operative
intervention.
• Surgery: Laparotomy. Assess bowel viability of congested
bowel loops. Management may vary depending on the
status of bowel; however if congestion and ischemia present, bowel resection of the nonviable segment and primary anastomosis.
• Wound closure: Primary closure using nonabsorbable
sutures. Consideration for retention sutures. Consideration
of mesh closure if indicated.
Common Curveballs
• Unstable intraoperatively: Consider damage control
approach, temporary abdominal closure with continued
resuscitation in critical care setting.
• Bowel ischemia is a possibility with strangulation of
bowel; continue with bowel resection, and if patient is
stable, proceed with anastomosis.
• No fascial defect but feculent drainage from wound suggesting stula—consider cross-sectional imaging and
proceed with stula management.
Clean Kills
• Delaying operative intervention for imaging
• Attempting to manage bowel evisceration nonoperatively
• Not performing laparotomy
• Attempting to perform diagnostic laparoscopy
• Not recognizing difference between incisional versus fascial dehiscence
Summary
Fascial dehiscence with bowel evisceration is a surgical emergency. In this case, the patient is promptly
diagnosed on presentation with physical exam findings of wound separation with visualization of bowel.
Care should not be delayed with obtaining imaging.
Open approach is standard of care for bowel
evisceration.

494
H. A. Bhatti and L. L. Perea
Enterocutaneous Fistula
Concept
Enterocutaneous stulas usually have an indolent presentation with a patient presenting several weeks later with small
opening from incision or abdominal wall with bilious type
drainage. Patients usually have a prolonged or complicated
postoperative course. Questions will test recognition, risk
factor assessment, and management of enterocutaneous
stulas.
Way Question May BeAsked?
“A 54-year-old male presents to the emergency department
complaining of abdominal pain and drainage of feculent
material from abdominal wound. He underwent previous
laparotomy with small bowel resection 6 weeks prior due to
complicated small bowel obstruction which required extensive lysis of adhesions. His postoperative course was complicated by an anastomotic leak which required
re-exploration.”
This case is presenting a patient who had a prolonged hospital course and postoperative complication after an exploratory laparotomy for bowel obstruction which necessitated
extensive lysis of adhesions.
How toAnswer?
History
• Look for “FRIENDS”
• Foreign body
• Radiation
• Inammation (Crohn’s disease)
• Infection
• Epithelialization of stula tract
• Neoplasm
• Distal obstruction
• Steroids
History Should Also Focus on Symptoms, Being Sure to
Rule Out Other Possibilities:
• Supercial versus deep wound dehiscence
• Necrotizing soft tissue infection
• Cellulitis
• Abscess
Physical Examination
• Check vital signs and systemic signs including fever.
• Peritoneal signs usually absent.
• Perform local wound examination; there may be signs of
erythema, edema, or induration. There is usually steady
leakage of bilious or feculent material from wounds with
fascial integrity intact.
Diagnostic Tests
• Enterocutaneous stula may be suspected based on history and physical examination.
• Basic metabolic panel (BMP) to evaluate for electrolyte
imbalances.
• Complete blood count (CBC).
• Computerized tomography (CT) with contrast can conrm presence of stula formation and rule out surrounding abscess formation as well as distal obstruction.
Treatment
• Wound care: Perform local wound care to protect surrounding skin; consider ostomy appliance to measure
output to classify as high (>500cc/day) or low (<200cc/
day).
• High output stula: Consider bowel rest with parenteral
nutrition to promote healing; if signs of infection are present, consider broad-spectrum antibiotics and source control if indicated.
• Low output stula: The patient may continue oral diet
with expectant management.
• Percutaneous drain placement under image guidance if
abscess is visualized.
• Antibiotic treatment if abscess is identied.
Common Curveballs
• Distal obstruction present
• High output stula with electrolyte imbalance
Clean Kills
• Proceeding to surgery for low output stula
• Failing to recognize risk factors for stula formation
Summary
Enterocutaneous stulas are abnormal communications
between the gastrointestinal tract and the skin. There are
various etiologies including surgical complications, inammation, and trauma. Prompt diagnosis is important to
prevent sepsis, malnutrition, and electrolyte imbalances.

141 Wound Dehiscence
495
Bonus Points
• Risk factors that impede wound healing and increase
abdominal pressure as related to wound dehiscence. It is
imperative to articulate your knowledge of the risk factors
to the examiners which include diabetes mellitus, obesity,
malnutrition, immunocompromised, and corticosteroid
and tobacco use.
• Gram-positive pathogens particularly enterococci have
been implicated as an independent risk factor and empiric
antibiotic coverage may be considered.
• Postoperative wound infection and emergent surgery are
signicant risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence.
• Consider use of negative pressure wound vacuum in
abdominal wounds to assist with granulation tissue
formation.
Words ofWisdom
Postoperative wound complications can vary in complexity
and need for repeat surgical intervention. Having a methodical approach to these patients in both the clinical evaluation
and workup can prevent delays in care. At times urgent or
emergent surgical intervention is required in patients with
wound dehiscence or evisceration and thus prompt recognition of these conditions is necessary.
Bibliography
Gillespie BM, Harbeck EL, Sandy-Hodgetts K, Rattray M, Thalib L,
Patel B, etal. Incidence of wound dehiscence in patients undergoing
laparoscopy or laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Wound Care. 2023;32(Sup8a):S31–43.
Gonzalez M, Ruffa T, Scaravonati R, Ardiles V, Brandi C, Bertone
S. Fascial dehiscence: predictable complication? Development
and validation of a risk model: a retrospective cohort study.
Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):50.
Lozada Hernández EE, Hernández Bonilla JP, Hinojosa Ugarte D,
Magdaleno García M, Mayagoitía González JC, Zúñiga Vázquez
LA, etal. Abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia prevention in midline laparotomy: a systematic review and network
meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg988. 2023;408(1):268.
National Institutes of Health. Wound dehiscence and surgical site
complications. MedlinePlus. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/arti-
cle/002979.htm. Updated July 15, 2022; Accessed August 23,
2023.
Smith AB, Johnson CD.Wound dehiscence: risk factors and manage-
ment. J Wound Care. 2018;27(5):281–5. https://doi.org/10.12968/
jowc.2018.27.5.281.
Stropnicky PV, Kandemir F, Schäffer M, Pochhammer J.Abdominal
fascia dehiscence: is there a connection to a special microbial spectrum? Hernia. 2023;27(3):549–56.
Tansawet A, Numthavaj P, Techapongsatorn T, Techapongsatorn S,
Attia J, McKay G, etal. Fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia
prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J
Surg. 2022;46(12):2984–95.
Taylor D, Dooreemeah D, Al HY, Jacobs R.Vacuum assisted closure
with mesh mediated fascial traction of open abdominal wounds
and acute fascial dehiscence, a single institution experience. ANZ
J Surg. 2023;93(7):1793–8.
Teklemariam BT, Biyana CF, Asfaw SA.Determinants of postoperative
abdominal wound dehiscence among patients operated in a tertiary
hospital. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022;32(4):739–46.
White M.The management of enterocutaneous stula. Cham: Springer
International Publishing; 2023. [cited 2023 Aug 24]
Alam M, Harikumar V, Reynolds KA, Hsu DY, Lazaroff JM, Chen
BR, et al. Risk factors for postoperative wound dehiscence
after skin repair: a case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol.
2022;87(5):1099–102.

Surgical Site Infections
AbdullahWafa andStefanLeichtle
142
Concept
Surgical site infections (SSIs) can occur on three different
levels: supercial incisional (skin and subcutaneous tissue
layers), deep incisional (muscle or connective tissue layers),
and organ space, potentially also involving more than one
level simultaneously. Classic SSI exam ndings may not be
provided initially, as the examiner will want to see that you
have a high index of suspicion for an SSI, prompting you to
inquire about these classic ndings on the history and physical exam portions of the case. Examples of history and physical exam ndings include fever, chills, diaphoresis, pain at
the surgical site (including organ-space abdominal pain if
abdominal surgery was performed), erythema, tenderness to
palpation, uctuance, induration, and/or purulent drainage.
Should a patient present with fever postoperatively, keep in
mind the common causes of postoperative fever (5 Ws—
Wind, Water, Walk, Wound, Wonder Drugs). As such, a
patient presenting with a fever around 5–7 days postoperatively may have a wound infection at any of the three levels.
If history and physical exam ndings are nonspecic,
additional workup includes laboratory testing (CBC with
leukocytosis and a left shift, elevated CRP or ESR, possible
lactic acidosis) and imaging studies (ultrasound, CT scan,
etc.).
Way Questions May BeAsked?
“A 32-year-old man who recently had an appendectomy for
perforated appendicitis 5 days ago presents to the emergency
department with subjective fevers and worsening abdominal
pain as well as pain at his umbilical incision. On physical
exam, the patient is febrile to 101 °F, tachycardic, and diaphoretic. He has an erythematous and tender umbilical inci-
A. Wafa (*) · S. Leichtle
Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical
Center, Falls Church, VA, USA
e-mail: Abdullah.wafa@inova.org; stefan.leichtle@inova.org
sion and has also tenderness to palpation in the suprapubic
region.” It is an easy pitfall to assume the patient simply has
an incisional infection and you may miss a simultaneous
organ-space infection. Given the history of a perforated
appendix, the patient will need further workup with a CT of
the abdomen and pelvis to evaluate for an intra-abdominal
abscess.
“A 58-year-old morbidly obese woman presents to the
clinic for routine follow-up after an open ventral hernia
repair with mesh 2 weeks prior. The hernia occurred after a
motor vehicle collision, resulting in a traumatic ventral hernia and a large abdominal laceration, both of which were
repaired during her operation 2 weeks ago. She has had
increasing erythema around her incision the last few days.
On exam, there are erythema, tenderness to palpation, and
uctuance at the incision with staples still in place.” If presented in clinic, attempt opening of the incision in clinic with
removal of staples. Inquire about the kind of mesh used (permanent or absorbable), as this will dictate management. The
mesh may ultimately need to be removed as part of source
control if the infection is determined to involve the mesh and
the mesh is of permanent material. Timing will be determined by proximity to the most recent operation, patient preoperative optimization, and overall current illness severity. If
the patient is between 10 days and 2 months postoperative
and otherwise clinically stable and healthy, it may be advisable to temporize the wound infection to allow for intraabdominal inammatory processes to subside prior to mesh
removal and abdominal wall reconstruction. For acutely ill
patients, operative intervention may be required sooner.
How toAnswer?
History
• Recent surgery
• Surgical indication, details of operation, type of repair,
materials used in operation, complications (review opera-
tive report)
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025
M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_142
497

498
A. Wafa and S. Leichtle
• Comorbidities, including immunocompromised state,
diabetes status, body habitus, smoking, steroid use
• Symptoms (fever, chills, sweats, pain, wound erythema/
drainage/swelling)
• Timing of symptoms from last surgery
• Prior workup
Physical Exam
• Vital signs (fever, hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea,
organ failure)
• Local signs of infection
– Tenderness to palpation
– Erythema, cellulitis
– Crepitus
– Fluctuance, induration, edema, swelling
– Drainage (“dishwater uid” indicates necrotizing soft
tissue infection (NSTI)!)
Diagnostic Tests
• Usually, a clinical diagnosis can be made based on history
and physical exam with bedside local wound exploration.
However, this can be limited by body habitus or location
of the SSI, e.g., if organ-space level or deep to the
incision.
• Laboratory testing (BMP and CBC, in particular leukocytosis with a left shift), elevated CRP/ESR, lactic acidosis.
Be prepared for the scenario to convert to a possible NSTI
with additional laboratory tests needed to calculate the
LRINEC score, such as evaluating for hyperglycemia,
hyponatremia, anemia, elevated creatinine, etc., if the
clinical diagnosis is unclear.
• Ultrasound.
• CT imaging.
• Rarely, MRI if the patient is pregnant or if a chronic
inammatory condition is suspected. Never in an unstable
or acutely ill patient.
• (Don’t let a nondiagnostic imaging test talk you out of a
clinical diagnosis.)
Treatment
The key to managing SSIs is prompt source control.
Inadequate source control, even of a “mere” supercial infection, can lead to serious complications such as NSTI development or fascial dehiscence after abdominal operations. This
can be accomplished in multiple ways depending on the level
of SSI.If the infection is supercial incisional or deep incisional, re-opening of the wound is paramount to allow for
drainage of the infection, irrigation, and possible debridement. Healing by secondary intention is key, as attempting to
close the wound primarily soon after wound drainage will
likely result in recurrence and possibly failure in the oral
board case. Secondary intention healing can be accomplished
via daily packing with wet-to-dry gauze either as a permanent
treatment for secondary healing or for a few days until the
infection is cleared, after which a vacuum dressing can be
applied and changed every 2–3 days thereafter.
If the infection involves the organ space, treatment
depends on multiple factors, including the patient’s degree of
illness, location, and size of the infection/abscess. In general,
less invasive options are favored (such as antibiotics or percutaneous drains placed by interventional radiology) over
more invasive options (reoperation). However, if the patient
is in septic shock or in extremis, if interventional radiology is
not available or their involvement is signicantly delayed, or
if the location of the abscess precludes percutaneous drainage, more aggressive options will need to be prioritized.
Small (<3–4 cm) abscesses found on imaging may be managed with antibiotics alone, with repeat imaging in 1–2
weeks, and close follow-up. Larger abscesses (>3–4cm) will
need to be drained.
Antibiotics are needed if an SSI is diagnosed and source
control has not yet been obtained. Once source control has
been obtained, long-term antibiotics are typically not indicated. The caveats to this general principle involve the degree
of illness of the patient and patient comorbidities. If the
patient remains critically ill or in septic shock, antibiotics
should be continued until the patient’s septic shock resolves.
If the patient is immunocompromised or is a poorly controlled diabetic, antibiotics may need to be continued.
Common Curveballs
• Scenario switching to NSTI.
• Scenario switching to management of an infected mesh.
• The patient acutely decompensates while pursuing less
invasive measures.
• Scenario switching to management of a critically ill
patient in the surgical intensive care unit.
• On local wound exploration, the wound is discovered to
track more deeply into the intra-abdominal cavity or
beyond the level of the fascia.
• The scenario switches to hemorrhage control during
wound exploration.
• The scenario switches to a patient in cardiac arrest or to
following ACLS protocols.
Clean Kills
• Missed or delayed diagnosis, with the patient clinically
progressively decompensating

142 Surgical Site Infections
499
• Delay in treatment, especially while waiting for interventional radiology
• Not operating on a large organ-space abscess that is inaccessible by interventional radiology
• Not obtaining a culture to tailor your antibiotic use
• Closing an infected wound immediately after draining it
rather than allowing it to heal by secondary intention
• Not controlling blood glucose in diabetic patient
Words ofWisdom
SSIs occur in up to 3% of patients undergoing surgery,
depending on level of contamination of a surgical site, patient
risk factors, and other modiable and non-modiable perioperative risk factors, and SSIs can occur even in the best of
sterile conditions and circumstances. SSIs can lead to signicant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures if not
recognized promptly and treated appropriately. Often, the
diagnosis can be made clinically, but for deeper SSIs, imaging adjuncts may be necessary. SSIs can occur at any of the
three levels of wounds and also at more than one level simul-
taneously. Source control by invasive and noninvasive means
is the key step for treating any SSI.
SSI oral board cases have the tendency to involve scenario
switches to more complex topics, such as abdominal wall
reconstruction timing and options, hemorrhage control,
ACLS, or intensive care unit management. Also, if antibiotics are used for too long of a duration, the scenario may then
switch to patients developing complications, such as
multidrug- resistant or Clostridium difcile infections.
Bibliography
Burhan A, Khusein NBA, Sebayang SM.Effectiveness of negative pres-
sure wound therapy on chronic wound healing: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Belitung Nurs J. 2022;8(6):470–80. https://doi.
org/10.33546/bnj.2220.
Marzoug OA, Anees A, Malik EM.Assessment of risk factors associated
with surgical site infection following abdominal surgery: a system-
atic review. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023;5(1):e000182.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit- 2023- 000182.
Seidelman JL, Mantyh CR, Anderson DJ. Surgical site infection
prevention: a review. JAMA. 2023;329(3):244–52. https://doi.
org/10.1001/jama.2022.24075.

Part XIX
Miscellaneous

Best Practices forVirtual Oral Boards
MaserayS.Kamara
143
The COVID-19 pandemic shifted surgical education to virtual platforms even extending to the General Surgery
Certifying Examination. In October 2020, after two pilot sessions, the American Board of Surgery administered the rst,
large-scale oral board examination using the Zoom platform.
As of the writing of this text, virtual examinations may have
become the new oral board standard. We do not know if/
when it will change back to the traditional in-person
examination.
This new format is accompanied by its own best prac-
tices—a few are detailed below.
Examinees will be required to complete a Candidate
Technology Precheck Survey and a Candidate Technology
Check. It is important to complete both the Survey and the
Check on the device and in the location (home, ofce, etc.)
where you will take the examination.
Prior to your exam time, complete your own test of the
microphone to ensure function.
The Board currently uses an external proctoring and monitoring service for the online CE Examination to ensure
examination security. Examinees are required to have a secondary device available (such as a cellphone, tablet, or secondary laptop) which is used to run remote proctor video
feed. This feed monitors and records the environment for the
duration of the examination.
Ensure that you optimize camera angle and lighting (avoid
backlighting or overlighting). Utilize a computer webcam
and place the computer on a xed surface, rather than holding on a lap.
Select a neutral background. Your background should not
be a conversation starter or icebreaker unlike the recommendation for application or job interviews.
Select a xed chair and minimize dgeting.
Your focus point should be chosen in advance to give a
sense of focused condence. Choose the locations of your
image and the examiners’ image such that you have a focused
gaze.
Monitor your body language by intermittently referring to
the live video of yourself. This can be done between questions or examinations.
Practice - set up a Zoom or Teams conference with a
friend or mentor. Record yourself. Play it back and watch
yourself. Take note of how you answer, what you say, how
you say it (speak slowly), how many times you say “umm”
and “ahh,” your body language, and lighting.
Be condent in what you know (and condent in what
you don’t).
Bibliography
Chen H, Tseng JF, Chaer R, Spain DA, Stewart JH 4th, Dent D,
Ibáñez B, Barry CL, Jones AT, Buyske J.Outcomes of the rst
virtual general surgery certifying exam of the American Board of
Surgery. Ann Surg. 2021;274(3):467–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/
SLA.0000000000004988.
Smith ER, Clanahan JM, Hess A, et al. The advanced certify-
ing exam simulation-pro assessment instrument: evaluat-
ing surgical trainee examsmanship in virtual oral exams.
Global Surg Educ. 2023;2:30. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s44186- 023- 00107- 7.
The American Board of Surgery. Your guide to a successful oral exami-
nation [Video]. The American Board of Surgery; 2018. September
27. https://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certce_video
M. S. Kamara (*)
Colon & Rectal Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor,
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025
M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_143
503

Futile Care
MarcNe andJohnathanSadeh
144
Concept
It is unlikely that this would be an initial question on the oral
board exam but could arise further into the questioning when
you have already “passed” and the examiner is trying to get
at your ethics and moral compass. Always be honest in your
answers, thorough and complete. The examiner is always
interested in your decision-making and if you are a “safe
surgeon.”
Way Question May BeAsked?
“A 66-year-old female with BMI 19 and 55lb weight loss
has an evaluation in the emergency department for abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The diagnostic testing
included a CT scan which reveals an enhancing thickened
stomach wall, with gastric outlet obstruction, ascites, and
evidence for carcinomatosis.”
How toAnswer?
History
• Initially, the approach would be to discern the underlying
surgical process. In this example, the questions would be
regarding the suspected gastric malignancy.
• Risk factors for gastric cancer.
• Degree of weight loss (would they heal from a surgical
intervention).
• Staging workup.
• Consideration of other malignancies that are potentially
still treatable.
• Discussions with patient and family about futility:
– A focus on quality of life and previous level of
function.
– Does the patient have the mental capacity to make
decisions regarding their care?
– Is there a living will?
– What level of medical sophistication does the patient
have/family have?
– What’s the prognosis? Days? Weeks? Months?
– How painful will any intervention be? Will there be
any benet?
Physical Examination
• Evaluate nutritional status—thenar/temporalis muscle
wasting.
• Pelvic examination for ovarian CA (i.e., which could still
be treatable with carcinomatosis).
• Examine lymph node basins (i.e., Sister Mary Joseph
node, Virchow’s node).
• Rectal exam (i.e., Blumer’s shelf).
Workup
• Full laboratory panel, tumor markers
• Additional imaging as needed
• Upper endoscopy (biopsy)
• Sampling ascitic uid by IR
• Biopsy of any palpable nodes
• (Goal here would be the least invasive test to make the
diagnosis!)
M. Neff
Department of Surgery, Jefferson Health of New Jersey,
Cherry Hill, NJ, USA
e-mail: Marc.Neff@jefferson.edu
J. Sadeh (
Department of Surgery, Jefferson Einstein Hospital,
Philadelphia, PA, USA
e-mail: Johnathan.Sadeh@jefferson.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025
M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_144
*)
Treatment
Patient-Centered Approach:
• Focus on the patient’s values, goals, and quality of life.
505
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
