Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1232_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
152
R. Caiafa et al.
less nutritional support. Prealbumin is the most commonly used serum marker to estimate nutritional status.

Timing

The benets of early enteral nutrition have been well estab­lished in patients who are critically ill and injured. It should be started within the rst 24–48h after ICU admission when appropriate. TPN is usually only initiated if the patient is expected to be NPO for more than 7days. Enteral and paren­teral nutrition is contraindicated in uncontrolled shock, need for high dose pressors, progressive acidosis, and uncon­trolled hypoxemia and acidosis. Enteral nutrition is also con­traindicated in patients with uncontrolled upper GI bleeding, bowel ischemia, bowel obstruction, abdominal compartment syndrome, GI intolerance, and high-output stulas without distal feeding access.

Enteral Nutrition

This is the preferred route because it preserves the gut muco­sal barrier and decreases infectious complications in surgical ICU patients through a variety of mechanisms. It also avoids the complications associated with parenteral nutrition.
Nonsurgical Enteral Access
This approach is preferred in patients who only need short­term nutritional support. Nasogastric tubes can be placed at the bedside or under uoroscopic or endoscopic guidance. Distal feeding tubes can be used in patients with proximal dysmotility or obstruction or severe esophagitis. They are placed under uoroscopic or endoscopic guidance. Distal feeding tubes have been shown in some studies to decrease the risk of aspiration and pneumonia compared with gastric tubes.
Surgical Enteral Access
This approach is preferred in patients who will require long-term nutritional support. The two most common types of surgical feeding tubes are gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Gastrostomy tubes can be placed endoscopically, radio­graphically, or surgically, while jejunostomy tubes are typi­cally placed surgically. Contraindications to all surgical feeding tube placement include gastric varices, severe coag­ulopathy, massive ascites, gastroparesis, gastric outlet obstruction, hemodynamic instability, increasing pressor requirements, and worsening acidosis. Contraindications to endoscopic placement include esophageal or oropharyngeal obstruction and high risk of aspiration.
Gastrostomy tubes are the most common type of surgical enteral access. Jejunostomy tube placement is indicated in patients who cannot have a gastrostomy tube placed, such as
those with prior resection of the esophagus, stomach, pan­creas, or duodenum. Combination tubes, such as a gastros­tomy with a jejunostomy limb, can also be placed.
Prior to the procedure, it is key to obtain a surgical his­tory, specically for abdominal operations. Patients with a history of gastric resection deserve special consideration when planning surgical tube placement, although this is not an absolute contraindication. CT abdomen/pelvis may also be helpful to delineate anatomy, although it is not required.
For PEG tube placement, 1:1 ballottement of single nger palpation at the insertion site and transillumination are man­datory to safely proceed with the operation. Gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes can also be placed laparoscopically or during laparotomy. Typically these are elective procedures performed on relatively stable patients.
Open Stamm Gastrostomy
• Choose site that will come up easily to anterior left
abdominal wall and is not adjacent to pylorus or GE
junction
• Purse-string suture around anticipated location of gastrot-
omy. Can perform two purse-string sutures
• Insert tube through abdominal wall
• Perform two or four sutures through abdominal wall and
gastric serosa to be tied later
• Make gastrotomy within area of purse-string suture, can
use bovie electrocautery
• Insert tube, close pursestrings, tie the abdominal wall
sutures
• Inate balloon
Open Jejunostomy
• Choose site ~30cm distal to ligament of Treitz that will
easily approximate to left anterior abdominal wall
• Conduct a purse-string suture at that site
• Insert jejunostomy tube through abdominal wall
• Create enterotomy
• Insert tube, close pursestring, and ll balloon—ensure
balloon is not occlusive of jejunal lumen
• Place two or four sutures through abdominal wall and
jejunal serosa to be tied later
• Witzel (optional) entails serosal tunnel of jejunum cir-
cumscribing a portion of the jejunostomy tube
• Tie abdominal wall sutures
The most common complication associated with these tubes is displacement. Tubes with a well-formed tract can be replaced at the bedside with a Foley or gastrostomy tube with a balloon. This should be done as soon as possible, and a study, either abdominal XR or CT abdomen/pelvis, using water-soluble contrast via the replaced tube should be obtained to conrm appropriate placement before using the tube for medications or feeds. Tubes displaced prior to tract
47 Feeding Tubes andNutritional Support
153
formation likely need to proceed to the OR for washout, gas­trostomy or jejunostomy closure, and tube replacement, especially when the patient exhibits peritonitis, hemody­namic instability, or septic shock. Other complications include tube occlusion and bowel obstruction either due to torsion around the tube or luminal obstruction by the balloon.
Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)
TPN is used when enteral nutrition cannot be initiated or is inadequate, such as in patients with severe obstruction or ileus, severe shock, high output stula, severe GI bleeding, short gut syndrome, or patients who do not have GI continuity.
Risks include mechanical complications associated with central line placement, such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, and arterial puncture; line sepsis; electrolyte disturbances; and liver dysfunction. Gut disuse is also associated with mucosal atrophy, bacterial overgrowth, diminished blood ow, and decreased gut immunity, which all can lead to bac­terial translocation across the intestinal wall and increased infection risk. TPN should not be abruptly stopped, as this may cause severe hypoglycemia.

Common Curveballs

Clean Kills

• Proceeding with PEG tube placement without 1:1 bal­lottement of single nger palpitation and transillumination
• Failure to proceed to OR after tube displacement in a patient with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or sep­tic shock
• Using barium instead of water-soluble contrast to conrm tube placement after dislodgement
• Using a replaced tube without radiologic conrmation after dislodgement
• Abrupt discontinuation of TPN resulting in hypoglycemia

Summary

• Early nutrition is benecial in critically ill patients
• Enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutri-
tion when appropriate
• The most common tube complication is displacement, and management depends on how long the tube has been in place
• The most common TPN complications are associated with central line placement and infection
• Overfeeding related metabolic abnormalities that may lead to difculty weaning from the ventilator
• Development of refeeding syndrome, which is suggested by hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, and hypomagnese­mia in patients with prolonged malnutrition, excessive GI losses, chronic alcohol abuse, metastatic cancer, or recent abdominal surgery

Bibliography

Courtney T.Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of mod-
ern surgical practice. 21st ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2022. John C.Current surgical therapy. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2023. Justin D.Clinical scenarios in surgery: decision making and operative
technique. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
Gastric andEsophageal Varices
MatthewSturdivant, YasamanKazerooni, andLuisCardenas
48
Scenario
A 55-year-old male with a history of ETOH abuse and cir­rhosis who presents to the ED in extremis with hematemesis. He is hypotensive, tachycardic, choking on blood, short of breath with oxygen saturations in the upper 80s. He was lost to follow-up after being denied a liver transplant as he was continuing to drink ETOH daily. On examination, he has spi­der angiomas, caput medusa, and mild jaundice of his skin. He presents with a sudden change in his mental status, and continued large volume hematemesis. You go to see him in the ED, what is your next step?
Dierential Diagnosis
Bleeding gastric ulcer, Dieulafoy lesion, Mallory Weis tear, Boerhaave syndrome, traumatic esophageal injury.

Etiology

Cirrhosis and other causes of increased portal hypertension cause esophagogastric varices. Pre-hepatic causes of portal hypertension are schistosomiasis and portal vein thrombosis. Intrahepatic causes of portal hypertension are many with cir­rhosis due to alcohol abuse being the most common. Post­hepatic causes include hepatic vein thrombosis, right heart failure, and other causes of cardiac obstruction. Varices can also form from splenic vein thrombosis. Varices most likely occur in the distal 1/3 of the esophagus and can occur throughout the stomach. Screening for varices should start early in patients with the above causes as bleeding is a fatal
M. Sturdivant · Y. Kazerooni · L. Cardenas (*) Division of Surgical Critical Care and Trauma, Department of Emergency General Surgery, Christiana Care Hospital, Newark, DE, USA e-mail: yasaman.kazerooni@christianacare.org;
lcardenas@christianacare.org
complication of varices. Only 50% of bleeding from varices does not stop spontaneously, while 80–90% of the upper GI bleeds of other causes may stop spontaneously (Friedman etal. 2022). There is a signicantly high risk of rebreeding within 10days of initial bleed. Mortality rate is 5–50% with bleeding and 60–70% with continued bleeding (Friedman etal. 2022). Patients with variceal bleeding can have bacte­rial infections with vatical bleeding (20%) and can develop them in hospitalized patients (50%) which compounds mor­tality risk if not treated (Friedman etal. 2022). The risk of mortality is higher when the bleeding is combined with decompensated cirrhosis. Mortality in recent years has decreased due to prophylactic antibiotics, use of beta­blockers, and more effective endoscopic techniques.

Exam

• The ABC’s in trauma are very important to evaluate every
patient in extremis regardless of etiology.
– Secure the airway—The possible large volume of
hematemesis puts the patient at high risk of aspiration and securing the airway will allow expeditious endo­scopic procedure to proceed if the bleeding does not stop spontaneously.
– Breathing to be evaluated quickly oxygenation and
ventilation.
– Circulation involves
Obtaining large bore IV access. Administration of blood products and activation of massive transfusion in the hemodynamically unsta­ble patient. Cardiac monitoring.
– Assessing GCS is another key portion when evaluating
the patient with profound blood loss causing decreased mental status.
• Evaluating the patient for pallor, amount of blood loss,
jaundice, palmar erythema.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_48
155
156
M. Sturdivant et al.
• Abdominal examination may reveal palpable hard liver, palpable spleen, caput medusa, spider telangiectasia, pain, ascites.
• Rectal examination may reveal bright red blood per rec­tum or melena depending on the acuity of the bleed.
• You may not know the etiology of the upper GI bleed or have a high suspicion for variceal bleeding, so proceed with an upper GI bleed algorithm initially until denitive diagnosis is achieved.
• Reverse coagulopathy with bleeding. However, elevated INR may be present in a cirrhotic patient due to underly­ing liver disease. To conrm coagulopathy, a TEG study would be benecial.
• EGD is the primary imaging and diagnostic technique used for variceal bleeding especially in the acute setting.
• Unstable bleeding patients do not belong in the CT scanner.
• Ensure proper documentation of the varies noted on endoscopy to ensure proper management (see Table48.1).
• Patients in stable condition who are not actively bleeding

Work Up

may have CT scans that demonstrate the varices, recana­lization of the umbilical vein.
• If the patient is in extremis, this expedites the need for care.
• Lab testing can reveal multiple possible processes related to the varices such as increased LFTs, low sodium, pos­sible low hemoglobin from hemorrhage, prolonged INR and bleeding times, low albumin, pancytopenia, and ele-
• Measuring the hepatic vein wedge pressure with a cathe­ter is also a possibility for evaluating the degree of portal hypertension.
• A pressure of >12 mmHg signies portal hypertension high enough to start variceal bleeding.
• The normal hepatic venous pressure gradient is <5.
vated BUN from bleeding.
Table 48.1 General rules for recording esophageal varies in Japan
Location (L) Form (F) Color (C) Red color signs (RC) Ls (locus superior) F0 (no varices) Cw (white) RWM (red whale markings) Lm (local medialis) F1 (straight, small) Cb (blue) CRS (cherry red spots) Li (locus inferior) F2 (moderately enlarged, beady) Cw-Th (thrombosed, white) HCS (hematocystic spots) Lg-c (adjacent to cardiac orice) F3 (markedly enlarged, nodular or
tumor-shaped) Lg-cf (extension from cardiac orice to fornix) Lg-f (isolated in fornix) Lg-b (gastric body) Lg-a (gastric antrum)
Reproduced from: Endoscopic management of esophagogastric varices in Japan. Ann Transl Med. 2014 (Miyaaki etal. 2014)
Cb-Th (thrombosed, blue) Esophageal varices: RC0, RC1,
RC2, RC3.
48 Gastric andEsophageal Varices
157

Medical Management

Management of the esophagogastric varices must undergo multidisciplinary methods.
• Adequate monitoring in a critical care setting – The ICU is the best place for acutely bleeding patients
as invasive monitoring, procedures, and escalated care can be provided to the patient.
• Avoid over resuscitation with crystalloids, use blood and
blood product resuscitation to euvolemia or until the patient is hemodynamically stable with improved end organ perfusion.
– Hemoglobin threshold of 7g/dL to avoid elevated por-
tal pressures and exacerbation of bleeding. – Platelets >50. – TEG guided resuscitation of a massive bleeding patient
to reverse coagulopathy of hemorrhage.
• Ceftriaxone (1g every 24h for 7days) is the preferred prophylactic antibiotic used for variceal bleeding. Fluoroquinolones are also used for patients with allergies to the cephalosporins or penicillins.
• Vasopressin and Terlipressin should be initiated early to lower portal pressures. Used for 24 h and 2–5 days, respectively (Friedman etal. 2022; Go 2019).
• Octreotide is used in variceal bleeding to decrease bleed­ing via reduction of portal pressure and indirect vasocon­striction of the associated vessels. Rebleeding, mortality, and reduced need for transfusions are also decreased with octreotide. Fifty micrograms octreotide bolus is then fol­lowed by 50μg/h drip for 5days (Friedman etal. 2022; Go 2019).
• Beta blockers are used to decrease the portal pressure in stable patients without bleeding. If a proton pump inhibi­tor is started while the etiology was unclear in the UGIB, it can be stopped after bleeding varices are found.
• After bleeding is controlled an EGD is usually repeated 2–4 weeks later to re-evaluate the esophagus and stomach.
• A temporizing technique for bleeding that is not con­trolled with banding or other endoscopic techniques is balloon tamponade. Blakemore-Sengstaken or Minnesota tubes are used to tamponade the massive variceal bleed­ing (Friedman etal. 2022; Go 2019; Klingensmith et al.
2016). This is only a temporary x. The balloons have
different ports and ination channels to inate the bal­loons in the stomach and the esophagus depending on the location of the bleeding after appropriate seating, usually 50cm from the teeth. There are also ports along the tubes to test within the esophagus or the stomach for bleeding. The balloon must be deated at serial intervals during the day to prevent ischemia and necrosis. This allows the medical and surgical team time to resuscitate the patient or get the patient to IR or OR for interventions.
• Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is performed for recurrent bleeding or massive bleeding. This creates a shunt between the portal and hepatic veins to decrease the portal pressure to assist in the cessation of the bleeding (see Image 48.1). This is 90% effective in stopping the bleeding and should also be considered in Child-pugh B and C patients early in the course as there is a mortality benet (Friedman et al. 2022; Go 2019; Klingensmith et al. 2016). In any of the shunting tech­niques, there is a risk of encephalopathy.
• Balloon tamponade, sclerosant injection or coils can also be injected into the veins to control pressure in interven­tional radiology.
• Surgical techniques involve creating a shunt between the systemic veins and the portal veins (nonselective shunts).

Surgical/Procedural Management

• EGD is the preferred method for evaluation and treatment of the varices. This therapy should be initiated within 12h or as soon as possible for hemorrhage control. Looking for the bleeding varices are crucial to identify during upper endoscopy (white nipple and or red wale signs). Adequate visualization is critical. Suction old blood.
• Typical therapies for treating the varices include clipping, cryoablation, sclerotherapy, injection, stenting, hemo­static sprays, and banding.
• Banding is the most effective for distal esophageal varices and is less effective for gastric varices. This controls acute bleeding in >90% of patients with a risk of recurrent bleeding in 30% of patients after the banding.
Image 48.1 TIPS procedure. (Modied from: https://www.saintluke-
skc.org/health- library/tips- transjugular- intrahepatic- portosystemic­shunt)
158
M. Sturdivant et al.
• Selective shunts create a connection between the splenic veins and renal veins.
• In these cases, the GE junction can be devascularized as described in the segura procedure or the esophagus can be transected after ligation of the varices.
• Transplant is a denitive therapy for the varices as well as liver dysfunction.

Follow-Up

• Patients should be maintained on beta blockers to decrease splanchnic ow (nadolol, carvedilol, propranolol).
• Serial ligations every 2–4 weeks should be also per­formed in stable, recovered patients until all varices are gone.

Clean Kills

• Not performing adequate resuscitation
• Not escalating to the ICU
• Not obtaining denitive airway
• Bringing an unstable patient to radiology for imaging
• Going to the OR without EGD rst
Words ofWisdom
• Don’t forget to take these high stakes cases one step at a time in an algorithmic fashion.
• Remember to work up the liver disease and if the patient survives the initial bleed to get source control or denitive therapy.

Bibliography

Friedman S, etal. Greenberger’s current diagnosis and treatment: gas-
troenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2022.
Go RC. Critical care examination and board review. McGraw-Hill
Education; 2019.
Klingensmith ME, et al. The Washington manual of surgery. 7th ed.
Wolters Kluwer Health; 2016.
Miyaaki H, etal. Endoscopic management of esophagogastric varices
in Japan. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2(5):42. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.
issn.2305- 5839.2014.05.02.

Dieulafoy Lesions

YasamanKazerooni, MatthewSturdivant, andLuisCardenas
49

Overview

A Dieulafoy lesion is an aberrant vessel that does not reduce in caliber when it extends from the submucosa to the mucosa. This large submucosal arterial malformation that usually occurs within 6cm of the GE junction in the stomach and can cause massive GI hemorrhage if it ruptures or intermit­tent bleeding that is unable to be identied. When bleeding episodes result in hemodynamic instability, there is an abso­lute need for transfusion of multiple blood products. As the patients presenting with Dieulafoy lesions often have con­comitant cardiac and renal disease, familiarity with this con­dition is relevant as these patients are at risk of transfusion-related injuries and signicant morbidity and mortality.
History and physical for any scenario involving GI bleed should include malignancy risk factors (smoked meats, fam­ily history, weight loss etc.), alcohol use, smoking, NSAID use, history of H. pylori, history of cirrhosis or portal hyper­tension, history of pancreatitis, prior endoscopies, prior fore­gut surgery, and use of anticoagulants or sources of coagulopathy.
When managing a patient with GI bleeds, always mention admitting them to a monitored settings, maintain at least two large bore peripheral IVs, type and crossmatch, secure the airway in case of massive hematemesis or patients with som­nolence and altered mental status, perform NG lavage to evaluate for upper GI bleed, and start PPI.In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, start octreotide and antibi­otics for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) prophylaxis. Perform endoscopic evaluation within the rst 24 h. CT angiography can be helpful inlocalization of the GI bleed;
Y. Kazerooni · M. Sturdivant · L. Cardenas (*) Division of Surgical Critical Care and Trauma, Department of Emergency General Surgery, Christiana Care Hospital, Newark, DE, USA e-mail: matthew.sturdivant@christianacare.org;
lcardenas@christianacare.org
however, endoscopic measures and interventional angiogra­phy can be both diagnostic and therapeutic.
Case Part 1
A 67-year-old male with a history of COPD, hypertension, CAD, and CKD presents to the emergency department for evaluation of dizziness and multiple melanotic stools over the past 24 h. He is noted to be tachycardic to 120s and hypotensive to 83/65. He is mildly tachypneic to 22 breaths per minute and is maintaining SPO2 >92% on 2 L nasal cannula. How would you manage this patient?
• Start with a focused history and physical exam.
• Establish two large bore IVs, check coagulation prole, type and cross, baseline CBC and chemistry prole.
• Admit the patient to the ICU.
• Insert a NG tube. The examiner may say “NGT is inserted with the return of a large amount of dark blood. What is your next step?”
• Maintain the NG tube to intermittent suction.
• Start IV proton pump inhibitor at least twice daily or con­tinuous infusion.
• If a patient has evidence of cirrhosis with portal hyperten­sion, start octreotide as well as antibiotics for SBP prophylaxis.
• Consult GI for an EGD.Prior to endoscopy, you may per­form gastric lavage with normal saline to help with better visualization.
• You may perform the EGD yourself or request a GI con­sult given the likely need for advanced endoscopic mea­sures to control the bleeding.
First EGD fails to identify the source of bleeding, given a
large clot burden in the stomach. Patient is now hemody­namically stable, however, continues to have numerous mel­anotic stools and need for transfusion of packed RBC for acute blood loss anemia. What is your next step?
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_49
159
160
Fig. 49.1 Algorithm for GI bleed management
Y. Kazerooni et al.
• Consider prokinetic agents (i.e., metoclopramide) and further NG lavage.
• Request for repeated endoscopic evaluation. If endo­scopic visualization remains limited, you should discuss Interventional Radiology with angiography.
Algorithm for management of most GI bleeds can be
found in Fig.49.1.
Endoscopic Characteristic ofDieulafoy Lesions
• Active arterial spurting, micro pulsatile streaming or pul­satile vessel in small but healthy mucosal defect.
• Freshly adherent clot to a small mucosal defect with healthy surrounding.
– Mechanical (i.e., Endo clips), thermal (i.e., Bipolar,
argon beam, monopolar though less ideal), chemical (i.e., epinephrine injection) techniques can be utilized. Dual modalities have the highest efcacy.
– When identied endoscopically, biopsy of the lesion in
the acute setting is not recommended given increased bleeding risk.
On angiography, Dieulafoy lesions are identied as tortu-
ous arterial formations with lack of early venous return.
• If the lesion is not amenable to coil embolization or endo­scopic measures and the patient continues to have hemo­dynamic instability or need for ongoing transfusion, you will need to proceed with surgical measures.
• This can include gastrotomy and oversewing the lesion or wide wedge resection.
• If a patient presents with melanotic stools and no evi­dence of upper GI bleed (per NG lavage or EGD) you should proceed with repeated colonoscopies, angiogra­phy and consider capsule endoscopy. Tagged RBC scans have high sensitivity but they are not ideal for localizing the location of the bleed.
Operative Management ofDieulafoy Lesions
• Position the patient supine with arms out under general anesthesia.
• Perform upper midline laparotomy.
• Endoscopically identify the location of the lesion and per­form an anterior gastrotomy accordingly (Fig.49.2).
• Place stay sutures on each side of the gastrotomy for bet­ter exposure.
• Once the lesion is identied suture ligate the lesion with permanent suture such at 2-0 silk.
• Close the gastrotomy in a single layer primarily or with a laparoscopic stapler.
49 Dieulafoy Lesions
161
involve antrectomy with gastro-enteric reconstruction, proximal gastrectomy with gastroesophageal anastomosis or stapled wedge resection of the gastric body.

Clean Kills

• Failing to perform the basic monitoring and resuscitative needs of your patient.
• Failing to evaluate for upper GI bleed in a patient with melanotic stools and no overt hematemesis.
• Failure to repeat EGD, or providing other options for localization and control of the Dieulafoy lesion.
• Failing to take the patient to the operating room when endoscopic measures and IR measures have failed.

Bibliography

Fig. 49.2 Operative management of Dieulafoy lesion. Perform ante-
rior gastrostomy if the lesion is in the gastric body. Place stay sutures on each side for better exposure. Once identied, suture ligate the lesion with permanent suture. Close the gastrotomy in a single layer primarily or with a laparoscopic stapler
• If unable to obtain hemostasis with suture ligation, you will have to perform a partial gastrectomy. This may
Baxter M, Aly EH.Dieulafoy’s lesion: current trends in diagnosis and
management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(7):548–54. https://
doi.org/10.1308/003588410X12699663905311.
Kusnik A, Mostafa MR, Sharma RP, Chodos A. Dieulafoy lesion:
scope it until you nd it. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36097. https://doi.
org/10.7759/cureus.36097.
Nguyen DC, Jackson CS. The Dieulafoy’s lesion: an update
on evaluation, diagnosis, and management. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(7):541–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/
MCG.0000000000000321.
Part VI
Hepatobiliary