Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1232_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
127 Postoperative Fever
441
Scenario 2
A 26-year-old male is admitted to the trauma service after suffering a motor vehicle crash while intoxicated. His inju­ries include a chance fracture of T11, fractures of the right 8th to 10th ribs, and a left parietal subarachnoid hematoma. He is taken to the operating room on hospital day 1 for pos­terior fusion to repair his spine and returns to the intensive care unit and is able to be extubated. On hospital day 5, he spikes a temperature of 101.5°F.He complains of pain in his left lower leg, and on exam it appears slightly larger than his right leg.
How toAnswer?
• This case represents a mildly complicated polytrauma patient with injuries that could each represent a potential source of fever. An intracranial bleed or spinal cord injury, if present, could be a source of central fever (this would be a diagnosis of exclusion).
• He has rib fractures that could certainly precipitate pneu­monia, but further information on this is not included in the stem.
• He had surgery and could have a wound infection. The main physical exam nding of a swollen, tender leg in a patient who is postoperative day 4 from a spinal surgery should set off alarms for deep vein thrombosis.
• Further concerning signs which are not included, but should be asked for, are other vital signs, evidence of hypoxia, and EKG ndings, to guide thinking in terms of PE.
– Workup should include bilateral lower extremity
Doppler ultrasound, as well as consideration of CTA PE protocol if other concerning signs such as hypox­emia and tachycardia exist.
– However, it is important to keep in mind that this
patient has a contraindication to anticoagulation in his initial injuries which must not be forgotten when developing a treatment plan.
– For this patient, if a DVT were present, he would likely
be recommended an IVC lter until therapeutic antico­agulation was deemed safe from a neurosurgical perspective.

Bonus Points

A mnemonic may be helpful: Wind (lungs: atelectasis vs pneumonia), Water (UTI), Walking (DVT), Wound, Wonder (drugs); these represent the more common causes of postop­erative fever in the chronological order in which they are more likely to occur.

Clean Kills

• Failure to consider pneumonia in the workup of postop­erative fever
• Failure to consider venous thromboembolism in the workup of postoperative fever
• Failure to consider urinary tract infection in the workup of postoperative fever
Words ofWisdom
Postoperative fever is sometimes benign, but it may also be a harbinger of grave clinical concern. The cause of a fever
may be multifactorial, but always remember to consider where the hands of the surgeon have been. Also keep in
mind that the elderly and those who are frail, at the extremes of age, and immunocompromised may not mount a febrile response. The wording in a question may not necessarily lead you directly to the source, so maintain a broad, but focused, differential, and conduct a workup that will narrow in on the diagnosis and treat the underlying problem. Lastly, in practice, a 3 degree rise in their baseline temperature, while not technically a fever, may still be signicant enough for alarm.

Bibliography

Abdelmaseeh TA, Azmat CE, Oliver TI.Postoperative fever [updated
2023 Jun 4]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK482299/.
Townsend JCM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL.Sabiston text-
book of surgery. 20th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences Division; 2016.

Postoperative Myocardial Infarction

KathleenJarrell
128
Way Questions May BeAsked?
A 57-year-old male with past medical history of peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and current tobacco abuse is now on post­operative day 1 status post-left femoral to popliteal artery bypass with a right saphenous vein conduit. He complains of dyspnea as well as chest pain with radiation to his left shoul­der. What is on your differential? How do you evaluate and treat?
How toAnswer?
• Start with a complete history and physical exam. – Focus on prior history of angina, coronary artery inter-
ventions, and other signs and symptoms of vascular disease. The presence of atherosclerotic vascular dis­ease anywhere in the body—in this case, peripheral artery disease—means the patient likely has it systemi­cally and is therefore at risk for myocardial infarction (MI).
• In this patient who recently underwent major vascular
surgery and with multiple underlying medical comorbidi­ties, a postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) should be high on the differential. The differential should also include an aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, heart failure exacerbation, gastroesophageal reux, and pericarditis.
What is the initial workup and treatment for chest pain in
a postoperative patient?
• Assess the patient’s stability and vital signs.
K. Jarrell (*) Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: Kmj009@jefferson.edu
• Review pertinent patient history—previous MI, history of cardiac conditions/previous cardiac surgery or stenting, relevant medications.
• Discuss current symptoms—location, character and severity of pain, any radiation pain, other associated symptoms (palpitations, diaphoresis, dyspnea, etc.).
• Perform a physical exam—cardiac auscultation.
• Obtain an EKG—assess for ST-segment elevations, ST depression, T-wave inversions, and Q-waves.
• Send basic labs and trend serial cardiac enzymes—over the next several hours.
– Troponin—delayed release, will be elevated over
hours to days after an MI.
– CK-MB—quick release, will be elevated earlier on in
the rst few hours of an MI.
– Consult cardiology for further management and pos-
sible intervention.
– If patient is found to have a STEMI or is unstable with
an NSTEMI, likely will proceed to PCI.
Will require aspirin, possibly clopidogrel, and a heparin drip post-procedure.
– If patient has a stable NSTEMI, treat medically in con-
junction with cardiology.
Oxygen supplementation, aspirin, pain control (IV morphine), heparin drip if bleeding risk is accept­able; consider starting a beta-blocker (to decrease cardiac demand), a statin (for plaque stability), and an ACE-I (to prevent remodeling).
What are common risk factors for postoperative myocar-
dial infarction (MI)?
• Coronary artery disease
• Recent stroke
• Previous MI
• Recent cardiac stenting
• Peripheral arterial disease
• Diabetes mellitus
• Hyperlipidemia
• Hypertension
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_128
443
444
K. Jarrell
• Smoking history
• Family history of an MI
• Recent major surgery
What steps can you take to decrease the risk of a postop-
erative MI?
• During the preoperative period, it is important to identify patients who have risk factors that place them at high risk for a postoperative MI.These patients should be referred to cardiology or their primary care physician for preop­erative risk stratication. This typically includes the RCRI scale or others such as the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator. Patients who have two or more risk factors on the RCRI scale are considered to be at high risk for surgery.
• Close co-management of these patients with their pri­mary care physician and/or cardiologist is important in the perioperative period. Beta-blockers should generally be continued in the perioperative period for patients who were already on them preoperatively. If a patient is found to have three or more risk factors on the RCRI scale, they can be considered to be started on a beta­blocker, at the discretion of their cardiologist. Statins have been shown to decrease postoperative cardiovascu­lar events and should also be continued in the periopera­tive period.
• Not recognizing atypical presentations of myocardial infarction
– Patients with long-standing diabetes mellitus may
have autonomic neuropathy which blocks the typical sensations of chest pain. Their presenting complaint may be nausea.
• Failure to consult cardiology and begin treatment in a timely manner
Words ofWisdom
Postoperative myocardial infarction is a serious complica­tion and can lead to signicant morbidity and mortality for patients if it is not managed appropriately and expeditiously. Early diagnosis and a high index of suspicion are critical, particularly in patients with multiple risk factors. Patients with a suspected myocardial infarction should be evaluated promptly: assess for stability; investigate symptoms; obtain an EKG and cardiac enzymes. General surgeons should know the initial management steps for myocardial infarction: supplemental oxygen, aspirin, IV morphine, heparin drip, and possibly beta-blocker. If the patient is unstable or has a conrmed STEMI, proceed with urgent cardiology consulta­tion and likely PCI.If they are stable, manage medically with assistance from cardiology.

Common Curveballs

• Arrhythmias – May require management with rate control agents – May require cardioversion in the case of atrial brilla-
tion with hypotension
• Symptoms of heart failure

Clean Kills

• Inadequate workup of a postoperative patient with chest
pain

Bibliography

ACS Risk Calculator—Home Page. https://riskcalculator.facs.org/
RiskCalculator/. Accessed 1 Sept 2023.
Badner NH, Knill RL, Brown JE, Novick TV, Gelb AW.Myocardial infarc-
tion after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(3):572–8.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542- 199803000- 00005.
Ruetzler K, Smilowitz NR, Berger JS, Devereaux PJ, Maron BA, Newby
LK, de Jesus Perez V, Sessler DI, Wijeysundera DN.Diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a scientic statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144(19):e287–305. https://doi.org/10.1161/
CIR.0000000000001024.
Townsend CM Jr, etal., editors. Sabiston textbook of surgery the bio-
logical basis of modern surgical practice. 19th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012.

Air Embolism

TylerFox andAnirudhKohli
129
Way Question May BeAsked?
You are called to the ICU to place a central line in an intu­bated patient. Following dilation of the tract, you hear a rush of air as you withdraw the dilator over the wire. The patient becomes tachycardic and their oxygen saturation decreases from 98% to 86%. Their blood pressure decreases from 120/60 to 88/50 and they are tachycardic to 110. What is the next best step?
How toAnswer?
• The next best step is to place an occlusive dressing over
the puncture site and place the patient in Trendelenburg position with their right side up.
• This prevents further air from entering the venous system
and helps sequester air in the right heart within the right ventricle. This lessens right ventricular outow tract obstruction and decreases air transit into the lungs.
• Additional management includes temporarily increasing
FiO2 to 100% to aid reabsorption of trapped air by nitro­gen displacement.
• Consider imaging (transthoracic echocardiogram) to
assess volume of intracardiac air.
Continued Scenario The patient stabilizes after positioning and increasing FiO2. Bedside ECHO is performed which demonstrates a large pocket of air within the RV.What would be the next step in management?
T. Fox Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA e-mail: foxt@mlhs.org
A. Kohli ( Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA
Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: anirudh.kohli@jefferson.edu
*)
• You can consider placing a multi-port catheter over the wire in the neck and attempt aspiration of the intracardiac air via syringe.
• It should be noted that de novo placement of a catheter is controversial.
What is a vascular air embolism? (Pathophysiology)
• Intravascular air embolism, divided into either venous gas embolism (VGE) or arterial gas embolism (AGE), is a rare and potentially fatal condition in which air within the intravascular space leads to obstruction of blood ow resulting in hemodynamic compromise and tissue perfu­sion decits. The main adverse clinical outcome is end­organ damage secondary to ischemic insult. In addition to obstruction, air bubbles may directly injure endothelium of the microvasculature which results in vasospasm and capillary leak, initiating a local or systemic inammatory response (Gordy and Rowell 2013; McCarthy etal. 2017). The severity of symptoms and lethality is determined by the composition of the gas, the volume of gas instilled, and the rate of instillation. A small volume of gas may have no effect. Moderate volumes of gas can result inlocal inammation and edema (e.g., pulmonary edema) (Shaikh and Ummunisa 2009). Large volumes of gas impair hemodynamics. A lethal quantity of air for humans is believed to be ~3–5 mL/kg (Gordy and Rowell 2013; McCarthy etal. 2017). If utilizing a 14 gauge needle, this amount of air can be instilled in <3 s, accounting for stan­dard central venous pressure (CVP) of 5 mmHg (McCarthy etal. 2017).
What are risk factors and incidence for VGE? For
AGE? (Epidemiology and risk factors)
• Venous gas embolism (VGE) is most commonly an iatro­genic complication in the healthcare setting. Risk varies with positioning and procedure. Most commonly these are secondary to central line placement or removal with incidences reported to be approximately 0.2–1% (Gordy
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_129
445
446
T. Fox and A. Kohli
and Rowell 2013; Brunicardi etal. 2014). Additional risk factors include (Gordy and Rowell 2013; McCarthy etal.
2017):
– Procedures ~5 cm or higher (Shaikh and Ummunisa
2009) above the heart (oral, maxillofacial, ENT, neu-
rosurgical procedures).
– Patient in sitting position:
This increases venous drainage above the heart and increases the gradient which could draw air intra­vascularly at a more rapid pace. Some series place the risk of air embolism in patients undergoing posterior craniotomies in
seated position as high as 10–80%. – Cardiac bypass: 0.003–0.007%. – Percutaneous lung biopsy. – Cavitation secondary to ablative procedures (tumor,
atrial brillation, etc.).
– Penetrating, blunt, or barometric trauma to the lung,
typically resulting in alveolar rupture and alveolar­vascular stula (Shaikh and Ummunisa 2009). Larger, penetrating injuries may result in larger communica­tions between the endovascular space and the airway.
– Abdominal insufation (e.g., with use of a Veress nee-
dle) (Powell-Brett etal. 2020).
• Arterial gas embolism (AGE) can result from the conver­sion of VGE to AGE via right to left shunt, most com­monly via a patent foramen ovale (PFO), as up to 9% of the general population may have a PFO (McCarthy etal.
2017). In one series, PFO was detected in up to 77% of
AGE (McCarthy et al. 2017). Additionally, AGEs may result from direct arterial catheterization, most commonly from an “unushed” catheter. Another possible etiology includes endovascular balloon rupture during vascular procedures (e.g., angioplasty).
• Outside of the healthcare setting, air emboli are also seen secondary to decompression during ascent in deep-sea divers. The soluble quantity of nitrogen gas in the blood increases with increased pressure as the diver descends. During ascent these gases dissociate from blood and may form large bubbles which embolize tissue.
What are the signs and symptoms of VGE/AGE?
(Diagnosis)
• Presentation varies from being asymptomatic to altered mental status to hypotension and cardiovascular collapse. Diagnosis is typically based on patient history and tempo­ral relationship of mechanism to onset of symptoms. Vascular air emboli can share common presentation with pulmonary emboli if the embolus enters the heart and/or pulmonary circulation. Such similarities include the fol­lowing (Brunicardi etal. 2014):
– Air in the pulmonary artery increases pulmonary resis-
tance which causes right heart strain, decreased car­diac output, and even arrhythmias.
– Air in pulmonary microvasculature causes V/Q mis-
match and increased pulmonary dead space. This results in hypercapnia and hypoxia.
– Air in the left ventricle (LV) may impede LV lling
and thus decrease cardiac output.
– Air in the coronary arteries may result in myocardial
ischemia.
• Other features of presentation vary with the end organ affected but commonly include a component of acute altered mental status or even seizures secondary to cere­bral air embolus. Air emboli in peripheral tissues can also cause pain. This is common in decompression in divers (“bends”) (Shaikh and Ummunisa 2009). Physical exam ndings may aid in diagnosis. These include (Gordy and Rowell 2013; McCarthy et al. 2017; Shaikh and Ummunisa 2009):
– Jugular venous distention secondary to increased right
ventricular (RV) pressures secondary to pulmonary air
embolus – Classic “mill wheel” murmur over the precordium – Evidence of right heart strain or arrhythmia on EKG – Dilated RV on bedside echocardiography – In the intubated patient: an acute increase in end-tidal
CO
2
– Visible intracardiac air on echocardiogram/bedside
ultrasound – Large pulmonary or intracardiac air emboli which may
be visible on CXR – Evidence of peripheral hypoxemia
What is the management of VGE/AGE? (Treatment)
• Monitoring and early recognition during at-risk proce­dures is critical. Mortality, even with prompt diagnosis and treatment, may be as high as 20% (McCarthy etal.
2017). It should be noted, however, that many more mild
cases of air embolism may go undiagnosed, thus raising mortality in reported series (McCarthy etal. 2017).
• The rst step after recognition is stopping further air entry by closing off portals to the arterial or venous circulation including capping or removal of central lines, sheaths, or catheters. Depending on the location of the air, supportive care may be the only viable option. This includes supple­mental 100% O
± hyperbaric oxygen (to decrease frac-
2
tion of nitrogen in embolized gas and speed reabsorption) as well as circulatory (pressors) and respiratory support (intubation) as warranted by the patient’s clinical status.
• For air emboli in the central venous system and right heart, Durant’s maneuver may be utilized. This entails placing the patient in Trendelenburg with right side up
129 Air Embolism
447
(left lateral decubitus). Air is moved away from the right ventricular outow tract and trapped in the RV.Aspiration can be attempted on trapped right ventricular air. The placement of a de novo catheter remains controversial (Gordy and Rowell 2013; McCarthy etal. 2017).
• In the setting of pulmonary trauma, cross clamping of pulmonary hilum to control bleeding may also prevent return of air to the left atrium from traumatic bronchial­venous stula.

Clean Kills

• Failure to promptly recognize air embolism while per­forming an at-risk procedure
• Failure to utilize appropriate positioning in suspected central venous gas embolism
• Failure to recognize potential sites of air entry and close off to prevent propagation of embolism

Bonus Points

• Use of point of care ultrasound in the periprocedural set­ting (operating rooms or intensive care units) can help in diagnosis of large pockets of intracardiac air and hence may expedite treatment.
Words ofWisdom
• Air embolism as a clinical condition needs a high index of suspicion, and any change in the clinical status of the patient that is temporally related to an invasive procedure should make you pause and strongly consider this diagnosis.

Bibliography

Brunicardi F, Andersen D, Billiar T, Dunn D, Hunter J, Matthews J,
Pollock R. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. 10th ed. McGraw­Hill; 2014. p. 1034–99. https://ia600908.us.archive.org/23/items/
SchwartzsPrinciplesOfSurgery10thEdition/Schwartz%27s%20 Principles%20of%20Surgery%2C%2010th%20Edition.pdf.
Accessed 27 Aug 2023.
Gordy S, Rowell S. Vascular air embolism. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci.
2013;3(1):73.
McCarthy CJ, Behravesh S, Naidu SG, Oklu R.Air embolism: diagno-
sis, clinical management and outcomes. Diagnostics. 2017;7(1):5.
Powell-Brett S, Richardson M, Super P, Singhal R. Veress needle
creation of pneumoperitoneum: a safe technique. Obes Surg. 2020;30:2026–7.
Shaikh N, Ummunisa F.Acute management of vascular air embolism. J
Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2(3):180.

Perioperative Care: Recent Myocardial Infarction

SubhadraAcharya
130
Way Question May BeAsked?
A 56-year-old male, heavy smoker, with recent myocardial infarction (MI) 2 weeks ago, now presents with intractable right upper quadrant abdominal pain and nausea with imag­ing concerning for acute cholecystitis.
How toAnswer?
• The example will include some kind of surgical problem in the setting of a recent MI.
• This could also be presented as a very high risk patient coming in with an urgent surgical issue who develops car­diac complications after surgery.
• Examinees should consider whether there is any way to temporize a surgical problem, noting that, ideally, surgery should be delayed as long as possible (but at least 6 months) after an MI.Usually, the scenario given will be such that such a delay is not feasible, based on the patient’s condition or nature of the surgical problem.
• History to elicit:
– Medical history: coronary artery disease, peripheral
vascular disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabe­tes mellitus, kidney disease
Including any interventions: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI), etc. – Family history: MI, CAD – Social history: smoking, alcohol, use, illicit drug use
• Imaging/labs – Complete blood count (CBC), basic metabolic panel
(BMP), electrolytes (as abnormalities can increase arrhythmia risk).
– If there is a concern for congestive heart failure (CHF),
one can add on BMP.
– Add troponins if there is concern for ongoing MI.
S. Acharya (*) Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
– Chest X-ray, EKG, echocardiogram (ECHO). – May require a stress test if there are new or concerning
abnormalities on ECHO.If there are reversible defects on stress thallium, the patient may need a cardiac catheterization.
• Other preoperative considerations: – Admission to a monitored bed. – Nitroglycerin drip preoperatively. – Invasive monitoring such as an intra-arterial catheter
for blood pressure.
– Patients with conduction system abnormalities may
require a pacemaker preoperatively.
Risk stratication for a preoperative patient:
Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)
• Has replaced the Goldman criteria for risk stratication
preoperatively
• Predictors include: – Type of surgery (intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, supra-
inguinal, vascular) – History of ischemic cardiac disease – History of CHF – History of cerebrovascular disease – Pre-existing diabetes mellitus that is being treated with
insulin – Preoperative serum creatinine >2 mg/dL
• Patients are stratied based on the number of predictors they have:
– Class I [0 predictors] correlates with a 0.4% 30-day
risk of death, myocardial ischemia (MI), or cardiac arrest (CA).
– Class II [1 predictor] correlates with a 0.9% 30-day
risk of death, MI, or CA.
– Class III [2 predictors] correlates with a 6.6% 30-day
risk of death, MI, or CA.
– Class IV [greater than or equal to 3 predictors] corre-
lates with a more than 11% 30-day risk of death, MI, or CA.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_130
449
450
S. Acharya
Other considerations:
• All anesthetic agents (local, epidural, or general) can pose cardiac risks and cause cardiac depression; therefore, there is risk with any anesthesia modality.
• Do not forget postoperative management. High-risk patients should get a post-op EKG and should be moni­tored closely.
Way Question May BeAsked?
A 70-year-old male with known atrial brillation, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure with ejection fraction (EF) of 25% on preoperative echocardiogram is now POD 0 from a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for an ascending colon mass. As he is brought from PACU to his oor bed, he complains of chest tightness and shortness of breath.
How toAnswer?
• Main thing to remember is to adequately work up these problems.
• History to elicit:
– Onset, inciting factors, relieving factors of the pain,
presence of dyspnea
– Prior episodes of similar symptoms
• Labs/imaging:
– CBC, BMP, electrolytes – Troponin, BMP – EKG – CXR – Depending on above, may need ECHO or further inter-
vention such as cardiac catheterization
• Other considerations:
– Monitored bed/telemetry – Medication optimization
Restart patients’ home medications, such as beta­blockers and diuretics as appropriate.

Common Curveballs

• Intraoperative ischemic event
• Intraoperative arrhythmias
• Post-op ischemia
• Post-op arrhythmias (Especially A-b, do not forget your ACLS algorithms!)
• Post-op pulmonary edema
• Preoperative management of patients with recent cardiac events

Clean Kills

• Not knowing any criteria that would make patient high risk via RCRI
• Not adequately working up the patient preoperatively
• Forgetting about intraoperative monitoring
• Believing one type of anesthesia superior to another (risk itself is just anesthesia, so do the surgery you need to do)
• Not appropriately working up or treating postoperative complications
Words ofWisdom
Oral board scenarios, involving recent MI, intraoperative or immediately postoperative MI, or other cardiac conditions, are common because they are relatively common and chal­lenging in real practice. Surgeons should have a basic under­standing of the cardiac risk stratication tools, steps to take to assist in perioperative monitoring and support, and initial treatment of MI in the immediate postoperative period.

Bibliography

Barker SJ, Gamel DM, Tremper KK.Cardiovascular effects of anesthe-
sia and operation. Crit Care Clin. 1987;3:251–68.
Bonaccorsi HA, Burns B.Perioperative cardiac management [updated
2023 Apr 17]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493196/.
Brown KN, Cascella M.Goldman risk indices [updated 2023 Feb 13].
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546604/.

Acute Kidney Injury

JoelB.Durinka andJoshuaA.Marks
131
Way Question May BeAsked?
Did the patient have a bowel preparation preopera­tively, i.e., was the patient dry to begin the case?
A 52-year-old obese (BMI 41) female presents for colon resection for a third episode of diverticulitis. Preoperative colonoscopy showed diverticulosis with a sigmoid stricture. The patient undergoes a laparoscopic converted to open sig­moidectomy due to the complexity of the dissection. On the morning of postoperative day 1, her urine output is marginal and her creatinine has bumped from a baseline of 0.95–1.58.
Was there a degree of obstruction from the stricture too that led to a further dehydrated state? What was the estimated blood loss (EBL) and how much resuscitation did the patient receive intraoperatively?
– Consider why the procedure was converted to open
and whether you have any anatomical concerns such as a ureteral injury.
– What interventions would you try and what would be
How toAnswer?
the expected outcome?
– Suppose you give two liters of lactated Ringer’s solu-
• History and physical examination should focus on risk factors for AKI (Table131.1).
• Examinees should try to think through the following questions as they prepare to answer:
– What are the likely causes of oliguria in this patient?
tion and the patient’s urine output does not increase and the creatinine continues to rise, what would you do next?
– What if the closed suction drain output also was
increasing?
– What is the patient’s volume status and what operative
data points would you want?
Table 131.1 Risk factors for developing AKI: Risk factors for developing postoperative acute kidney injury
Prerenal Renal Postrenal Type of surgery Patient factors Hypovolemia Nephrotoxic medication
– Aminoglycosides – Amphotericin
B-NSAIDS Hemorrhage Radiocontrast media (?) Cell debris Major vascular surgery Obesity Third space loss Rhabdomyolysis BPH Emergency surgery High ASA class Hypotension Neurogenic bladder Laparoscopic surgery Underlying renal insufciency
RAAS blockers Diabetes Increased intra-abdominal pressure
Stones Cardiac surgery Age
Foley obstruction Impaired cardiac function
Anemia
Chronic liver disease Preexistent Essential Hypertension
J. B. Durinka · J. A. Marks (*) Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: Joel.Durinka@jefferson.edu; joshua.marks@jefferson.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_131
451
452
J. B. Durinka and J. A. Marks
Alternate Scenario
A 64-year-old male undergoes an open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and is admitted to the SICU postop­eratively. He remains intubated and sedated. In the early postoperative period, his urine output is robust but then drops off precipitously. He is now 12h postoperative and the nurse is calling and saying the patient is oliguric and his creatinine has doubled since surgery.
How toAnswer?
• It is important to think about possible etiologies and develop a focused differential diagnosis specic to the scenario.
– Hypovolemia: What was the EBL? Is he bleeding?
Check hemoglobin and hematocrit.
– Hypoperfusion/hypotension: What are his current
hemodynamics? What is his baseline blood pressure? What was his pressure throughout the case?
– Medications: What does he take at home? What has he
received? For example, does he take an ACE inhibitor and did he take it the morning of surgery?
– Pulmonary mechanics: Is he stable on the ventilator?
What are his peak airway pressures?
– Abdominal exam: Is he distended or taut? Are you
concerned about intra-abdominal hypertension? Check the urinary catheter and measure bladder pressure.
• Consider the index operation, what was done, and what technical factors could be contributing.
– Why was the AAA done open as opposed to an endo-
vascular approach? Was the AAA juxta-renal? Were the renal arteries manipulated, covered, or reimplanted?
– Was there a suprarenal or supra-celiac clamp placed to
sew the proximal anastomosis? If so, what was the cross-clamp time? Was furosemide or mannitol given intraoperatively prior to the cross-clamp to “protect” the kidneys, and was the initial robust urine output a byproduct of that?
• Volume resuscitate and reassess whether the intervention has the desired effect. Always reassess any intervention and reevaluate as time passes and new information such as labs and vitals becomes available.
The pathophysiology of AKI can generally be character-
ized as prerenal, intrinsic renal, or postrenal. Assessments of volume status as well as analysis of urine and serum elec­trolytes may help distinguish between the likely causes (Table131.2).
Table 131.2 Denitions and staging of acute kidney injury
Denition of acute kidney injury
Increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.3mg/dL within 48h
or
Increase in serum creatinine to ≥1.5 times baseline, which is known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days
or
Urine volume <0.5mL/kg/h for 6h
Staging of acute kidney injury Serum creatinine Urine output Stage 1
1.5–1.9 times baseline
or
≥0.3mg/dL increase
Stage 2
2.0–2.9 times baseline
Stage 3
3 times baseline
or
Increase in serum creatinine to ≥4.0mg/ dL
or
Initiation of renal replacement therapy
or
In patients <18 years, decrease in eGFR to <35mL/min/1.73m
2
<0.5mL/kg/h for 6–12h
<0.5mL/kg/h for ≥12h
• Prerenal: hypovolemia. Decrease in circulating intravas- cular volume from bleeding or dehydration. It may also be caused by medications that affect regulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) or impair the normal regulatory mechanisms of afferent and effer­ent arterioles, such as vasodilatation from inammation, sepsis, or anesthetic agents.
• Intrinsic renal: acute tubular necrosis (ATN). In surgical patients, this is often from the effects of sustained hypo­perfusion. Intrinsic renal injury though may also be caused by medications or chemicals that are directly toxic to the kidney such as nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aminoglycosides, and amphotericin B.Trauma patients with crush injuries or impaired blood supply to the extremities may also develop rhabdomyoly­sis, and the release of myoglobin from injured muscle may cause kidney injury by renal vasoconstriction, the formation of tubular casts caused by myoglobin precipita­tion, or injury of tubular cells by free oxygen radicals. The use of contrast media in radiographic imaging is another commonly discussed cause of AKI in surgical patients, although whether contrast-induced nephropathy truly exists as a real entity with modern contrast media is debatable. The proposed mechanisms of contrast media­induced AKI were thought to involve a combination of medullary vasoconstriction/ischemia and direct injury/ cytotoxicity to tubular epithelial cells.