Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1232_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
428
M. V. Butchy et al.
• Describe a laparoscopic appendectomy. – There are several different techniques for a laparo-
scopic appendectomy; most commonly performed is the three-port appendectomy (one camera port and two “working” ports); however one-port appendectomies have been described.
– Gain access to the abdomen through the umbilicus;
grasp both sides of the umbilicus with towel clips; lift; make a small defect in the base of the umbilicus using an 11 blade.
– Use a Schnidt forceps to open the umbilical ring defect
and place 5 or 12mm trocar in the defect and insufate the abdomen. Place 5mm port in LLQ and 5mm port above the pubic symphysis taking care to avoid the bladder.
– Place table in Trendelenburg with patient’s right side
up.
– Identify the appendix and cecum. If the appendix is
retrocecal, mobilize the colon.
– Develop a window between the base of the appendix
and mesoappendix.
– Transect the appendix and the mesoappendix at the
base using a stapler or an endoloop.
– Place appendix in endoscopic retrieval pouch and
remove through the umbilicus or LLQ port.
– Inspect mesoappendix for signs of bleeding; irrigate
and inspect the abdomen for hemostasis.
• Describe an open appendectomy. – Make RLQ incision. Over McBurney point (also could
be the point of maximal tenderness, paramedian or lower midline).
– Create a muscle-splitting incision—divide muscle par-
allel to bers. – Pull the cecum; deliver the appendix into the wound. – Carefully divide and ligate the appendiceal mesentery
at the base of the appendix. – Crush the appendix and ligate the proximal edge of the
crushed appendix. – Place a purse string/Z-stitch the wall of the cecum at
the base of the appendix; wait to tie it. Transect the
appendix able the ligature and remove, tying down the
purse string/Z stitch. – Close incision in three layers, peritoneum/transversalis
fascia, internal oblique, and then external oblique.
• What are some common complications? – Pelvic abscess – Stump leak – Dropped or loss fecalith – Bowel obstruction – Bowel/bladder/vascular injury from trocar

Perforated Appendicitis

Alternate Scenario
“A 10-year-old boy is transferred to your ED after presenting with 2–3 days of fever, RLQ abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The mom reports that the patient has been feeling unwell for 2–3 days. CT acquired at the outside hospital emergency department shows a dilated and uid-lled appendix with surrounding tissue stranding, free uid in the pelvis, and suspected perforation.”
• How would you manage this patient differently? – Patients that present with abscess can be difcult to
manage.
– Data favors early appendectomy compared to initial
antibiotics followed by interval appendectomy. Patients with initial antibiotics had longer hospitaliza­tions, higher hospitalization cost, and fewer adverse events.
– It’s very reasonable to plan to take this patient with
signs of perforated appendicitis to the OR for a laparo­scopic or open appendectomy.
– At the time of surgery, if it is not safe to remove the
appendix, then washing out the abdomen and draining the collection is a reasonable option.
– Most important is to continue antibiotic therapy fol-
lowing surgery, typically monotherapy Zosyn or dual therapy with ceftriaxone and metronidazole.

Perforated Appendicitis, Interval Appendectomy

Alternate Scenario
“A 10-year-old boy is transferred to your ED after presenting with 1–2weeks of fever, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomit­ing. The mom reports that the patient has been feeling unwell for 1–2 weeks. CT acquired at the outside hospital emer­gency department shows a dilated appendix with surround­ing uid concerning for large walled-off abscess.”
• How would you manage this patient differently? – Patients that present with clear abscess can be difcult
to manage. There is controversy in deciding whether to manage nonoperatively with antibiotics, to place a CT­guided drain, or to take the patient to the OR for appen­dectomy and washout. There is concern that in the acute inammatory phase, surrounding structures may be damaged in the process of resecting the appendix.
– Walled-off abscesses collected are generally managed
best with IR drainage and IV antibiotics.
124 Pediatric Appendicitis
429
• What is the appropriate length of time to interval appendectomy?
– At an interval of 6–8weeks after initial presentation.
• Further recommendations
– In nonperforated appendicitis, there is no evidence that
suggests additional antibiotics (after initial dosing of perioperative antibiotics) improve outcomes.
– Many children that undergo laparoscopic appendec-
tomy for nonperforated appendicitis go home the same day of surgery.
• Long-term follow-up
– Routine follow-up is typically limited to one ofce
visit for a wound check.

Clean Kills

• Offering nonoperative management for a patient with appendicolith
• Failure to initiate antibiotics for patient with perforated appendicitis
• Failure to resuscitate a patient prior to the OR
• Continuing to pursue resection in a complicated perfo­rated appendicitis when there is substantial inammation
• When operating, if there is creeping fat on the TI and it looks abnormal, the patient may need a workup for Crohn’s disease. Take the appendix if the base is not inamed!! This removes the differential for the patient in the long term.
Words ofWisdom
• Since this is the most common pediatric surgical proce­dure performed, we spend a lot of time discussing these patients. In general, a simple appendicitis can be diag­nosed without imaging, with a negative appendectomy rate<5%. These patients only receive antibiotics preop­eratively and go home following the procedure. Complicated/perforated appendicitis practice varies, but for shorter duration <5days without a contained abscess, go to the operating room, and stay inpatient for 3 days for IV antibiotics. At day 7, if they are still febrile or symp­tomatic, many surgeons would elect to reimage for abscess. At this point, patients with new abscess go to IR for drainage.

Bibliography

Bonus Points

• If the appendix looks normal, then you need to identify a cause for the abdominal pain. Look for Meckel’s diverticulitis!!
Holcom and Ashcraft’s Pediatric Surgery (7th ed.). Chapter 42.
Appendicitis. Hollwarth M. 2019. Operative dictations in general and vascular surgery. Townsend, J. C. M., Beauchamp, R. D., Evers, B. M., & Mattox, K. L.
(2016). Sabiston textbook of surgery (20th ed.). Elsevier - Health
Sciences Division.
www.surgicalcore.org. SCORE. Appendicitis. (Pediatric/Fellowship
Level) August 17, 2023.

Tracheoesophageal Fistula

AdamGoldsmith andErikaB.Lindholm
125

Concept

Inability to pass OG/NG tube with radiologic evidence of coiled NG/OG tube on chest X-ray. Without gastric bubble (isolated esophageal atresia). With gastric bubble (distal tra­cheal stula).

Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Scenario
Pediatric surgery is consulted for a healthy full-term new­born infant with excessive drooling and coughing during the rst attempt to feed. The patient’s oxygen saturation was noted to decrease while they attempted feeding. Due to inability to feed, an OG tube was attempted but was unable to be placed. CXR shows distal air within the intestine.
• How would you assess and diagnose your patient? – First ensure the patient’s airway is secure. Elevate the
head of the bed to 30°.
– With known inability to place an NG or OG tube, the
next best step would be to get a CXR showing conr­mation of the tube curled in the proximal esophagus.
Insufation through the OG at the time of CXR can help show the proximal pouch. If radiographic ndings are equivocal, a contrast esophagram may be performed though it carries increased aspiration risk.
– CT is not routinely recommended due to increased
radiation risk.
• What time of TEF does this patient have?
A. Goldsmith Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA
E. B. Lindholm ( Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Regional Hospital, Cooper University, Camden, NJ, USA e-mail: Lindholm-Erika@cooperhealth.edu
*)
– Both type A and B will present with a gasless abdomen
due to lack of distal stula. The presence of gas means that it is most likely a type C but could be the much rarer type D.Many surgeons prefer to perform bron­choscopy in the OR to check for a more proximal dou­ble stula.
• Does the patient need any additional studies? – Due to association with VACTERL, these patients
should undergo careful physical exam as well as full cardiac and genitourinary workup to identify any other associated malformations.
– ECHO is critical to assess for additional abnormalities,
including aortic arch location. In patients with a right­sided arch, many surgeons would choose to perform a left-sided thoracotomy for surgical repair.
• Describe the surgical repair options and considerations
regarding the timing of surgery
– Procedure may be done electively though often in the
rst few days of life in healthy patients weighing >1.6kg.
– Extrapleural access is acquired via open right
thoracotomy.
– In the most common variant (type C), proximal esoph-
ageal blind pouch with distal TEF denitive treatment is by stula division with tracheal repair and primary anastomosis of the esophagus.
The stula will typically be located underneath the azygos vein and can be identied after the vein is ligated. Typically, a vascular clip is placed over the stula prior to ligating to ensure that the aorta or bronchus is not mistaken for the stula.
– Circumferential dissection of the proximal pouch
allows it to be removed off the membranous portion of the trachea, and subsequent tracheal repair with inter­rupted nonabsorbable sutures can follow.
– The proximal esophageal segment should be mobi-
lized rather than the distal segment due to its more robust blood supply.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_125
431
432
A. Goldsmith and E. B. Lindholm
– The esophagus should be anastomosed with minimal
tension after the proximal and distal ends are prepared with good perfusion.
– Chest tube is placed near the anastomosis to control
leak and prevent tension pneumothorax from occurring.
• Postoperative management – Patients typically remain NPO for 5–7 days when an
esophagram is performed to check for leak and stric­ture. If the esophagram is satisfactory, then the patient is started on feeds and the CT is removed.
• What complications may arise? – Leaks of the esophageal anastomosis occur in 15% of
patients. Leaks can be controlled or uncontrolled.
Patients with controlled leaks are managed by the chest tube and remain stable. These leaks can be monitored by repeat esophagrams until the leak has sealed. Uncontrolled leaks show extravasation into the chest cavity. The patients can be quite sick. Additional chest tubes may be placed to attempt to control the leak. However, as last resort, these patients may need to go back to the OR for diversion.
– Anastomotic strictures are more common, occurring in
nearly 80% of patients. This can be managed with serial dilation in the operating room.
– All patients will suffer from GERD and may be at
increased risk for Barrett esophagus and esophageal cancer.
• What is the prognosis after surgery? – Nearly 100% survival in patients without other severe
congenital abnormalities.
– The lowest survival rates are seen in patients with low
birth weight and/or severe cardiovascular abnormalities.
Alternate Scenario
Pediatric surgery is consulted for a healthy full-term new­born infant with excessive drooling and coughing during the rst attempt to feed. Due to inability to feed, an OG tube was attempted but was unable to be placed. Follow-up chest X-ray demonstrates curling of the OG tube in the proximal esophagus without any distal gas.
– These patients will still go to the OR for placement of
a gastrostomy tube so that the child can have enteral nutrition. At this time, a bougie is placed through the mouth into the proximal pouch, and a probe from the gastrostomy into the distal pouch can measure the length of the gap on XR.Patients with a gap >3 verte­brae are termed “long-gap” and require different treat­ment as it is unsafe to repair the esophagus at this time.
• What are the important considerations for treating this child?
– Proximal blind pouch decompression with an indwell-
ing Replogle to prevent aspiration of oral secretions.
– Feeding access via gastrostomy because as the child
grows the pouches will actually get longer and closer together. This is the most traditional approach to repair. Monthly measurements of the gap length until the gap gets small enough for surgical repair.
– Lengthening
This remains a challenging area with many options. Large bolus gastric feeds are often utilized to maxi­mize growth of the distal esophageal pouch. External traction sutures can be placed to more rap­idly pull the pouches together—the Foker process. If more length is required, primary intrathoracic segmental esophageal replacement via colonic seg­ment can typically be performed between 4 and 6months. Other rare options are gastric tube pull-up and small intestinal free microvascular graft.

Clean Kills

• Taking a newborn to the OR without ECHO evaluation. Cardiac anomalies are part of the VACTERL association.
• Bringing the baby back to the OR in a controlled anasto­motic leak. Wait it out—can continue for weeks.
• Failing to properly identify the stula and ligating the wrong structure. After you place the vascular clamp, watch the pressures remain stable and the lung continues to inate.

Bonus Points

• What is different in this case? – The lack of distal bowel gas indicates the lack of distal
tracheal stula, so it would have to be a type A or B stula. Both are rare, but more common to be a pure esophageal atresia (type A) which means there is a long gap which is not amenable to immediate surgery.
• How is the management different?
• Remember the dangerous condition here is the stula. The goal of surgery is ligation of the stula to prevent airway complications. In premature babies <1.6kg, the safest approach is to ligate the stula and come back for denitive repair when it is >2kg.
• TEF can be found in combination with other conditions— most commonly duodenal atresia and anorectal malfor­mations. When discussing the order of repair, most
125 Tracheoesophageal Fistula
433
important is ligation of the stula for safety; then you must repair the distal obstruction prior to xing the esophageal atresia. In some cases, you can repair every­thing in the same OR visit, but if not ligate the stula, x the obstruction, and potentially provide some feeding access.
Words ofWisdom
• The key to a safe surgery is ensuring that the proper workup has been performed. Parents should be made aware of the postoperative complications and how they
are managed. Setting the correct expectations for recov­ery is key. I always discuss the need for long-term PPI and that the patient will always have some element of reux due to the abnormal anatomy of the stomach and esophagus.

Bibliography

www.surgicalcore.org. SCORE. Esophageal Atresia and
Tracheoesophageal Fistula. (Pediatric/Fellowship Level) August 17, 2023.
Townsend, J. C. M., Beauchamp, R. D., Evers, B. M., & Mattox, K. L.
(2016). Sabiston textbook of surgery (20th ed.). Elsevier - Health Sciences Division.
Part XVII
Perioperative Care

Postoperative Hypotension

JoelB.Durinka andJoshuaA.Marks
126

Postoperative Hypotension

Hypotension in the postoperative patient can be due to seri­ous causes such as bleeding, sepsis, adrenal insufciency, or cardiac causes. It is important to diagnose and treat these conditions, since their progression can result in shock, multi­organ failure, and death.
Once these life-threatening causes are ruled out, other
more common causes such as hypovolemia due to insensible losses during the case or reactions to certain drugs, espe­cially narcotics, sedatives, and epidural regional anesthesia, should be considered.
• Postoperative bleeding is usually due to incomplete hemostasis during the operation or coagulopathy, which can be seen after severe trauma or in liver failure. It is imperative to rule out bleeding as the cause of hypoten­sion in the immediate postoperative period since it may require a return to the operating room.
• Sepsis can cause distributive shock due to a massive inammatory response to infection. Usually the infection is bacterial, although fungi, viruses, and parasites can also cause sepsis. The inammatory cascade that occurs causes vasodilation and increased capillary permeability, result­ing in hypotension due to decreased circulatory volume.
• Adrenal insufciency can result in systemic hypotension due to low levels of glucocorticoids, which are necessary for adequate systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Adrenal insufciency can be primary (Addison’s disease) or sec­ondary as a result of suppression of the hypothalamic­pituitary- adrenal (HPA) axis. In either case, any stress on the body, such as with surgery, trauma, or major illness, will require additional glucocorticoid to maintain SVR and blood pressure. However, patients with adrenal insuf-
J. B. Durinka · J. A. Marks (*) Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: Joel.Durinka@jefferson.edu; joshua.marks@jefferson.edu
ciency will be unable to endogenously produce this additional steroid, and can present with refractory hypo­tension postoperatively. The HPA axis will be iatrogeni­cally suppressed in patients that are on steroids for medical conditions (COPD, rheumatoid arthritis), and it is important to recognize that refractory hypotension in these patients may be due to adrenal insufciency. Adrenal suppression is a commonly tested side effect in patients receiving etomidate, a sedative used for induction of anes­thesia. This is rarely seen as it typically only occurs with continuous etomidate infusions, which are no longer done.
• Cardiac causes of postoperative hypotension include acute myocardial infarction (MI) from coronary artery plaque rupture resulting in left ventricular (LV) dysfunc­tion, exacerbation of congestive heart failure (CHF), or arrhythmias. Atrial brillation with rapid ventricular response (RVR) occurs frequently after surgery due to uid shifts and electrolyte imbalances and can result in hypotension due to decreased lling time of the LV and decreased preload. Preoperative cardiac assessment, which may involve stress testing, should be done for patients with cardiac risk factors to evaluate their risk of perioperative cardiac complications, and coronary revas­cularization may be needed to decrease risk prior to elec­tive noncardiac surgery.
Way Question May BeAsked?
A 54-year-old man with a non-obstructing colon adeno­carcinoma presents for colectomy. He has a history of hypertension and coronary artery disease, and he had a coronary artery bypass graft 2years ago. He walks his dogs most days around the block and hikes 2–3miles on weekends. The patient underwent a successful robotic low anterior resection with primary anastomosis. The procedure was uncomplicated. About 30min after being brought to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_126
437
438
J. B. Durinka and J. A. Marks
patient becomes hypotensive to the 70s systolic and tachycardic to the 140s. Also, the patient has not made any urine since he arrived in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU).
Way toAnswer?
• Examine the patient. Is the abdomen distended? Does he have any drains that might be sanguinous? What is his temperature?
• Begin volume resuscitation (ensure appropriate venous access)—initial limited crystalloid followed by early blood transfusion, especially, if bleeding is suspected.
• Check STAT CBC/hemoglobin—recognize however that hemoglobin is not an acute phase reactant and may not immediately reect the fact that the patient is bleeding.
– Other labs of interest: lactate, coagulation parameters
(platelet count, INR, thromboelastography (TEG)).
• EKG for tachycardia—assess for regularity, atrial brilla­tion, and/or ST segment changes.
• Prompt return to operating room for exploration and hem­orrhage control.
• Consider transfer to higher level of care postoperatively.
• Monitor hemodynamics, urine output, and other end­points of resuscitation.
• Once stabilized, halt active resuscitation and evaluate for appropriateness of diuresis.
Way toAnswer?
• Assess hemodynamics and observe postoperative trend.
• Review labs.
• Start resuscitation. Ensure adequate IV access and moni­toring. Consider vasopressor support.
• Check an EKG and draw cardiac enzymes.
– EKG shows Ab—what do you do?
Attempt to rate control to increase lling time vs synchronized cardioversion since the patient is unstable.
– EKG shows ST segment elevations in leads II, III, and
aVF—what do you do?
STAT cardiology consult for cardiac catheterization. Is it OK to heparinize and/or place on antiplatelet therapy?

Bonus Points

Patients taking chronic steroids should receive stress dose steroids prior to surgery and general anesthesia. Typically less than the equivalent of 20mg of prednisone daily does not derive benet from stress dose steroids.
Words ofWisdom
Alternative Scenario
A 58-year-old man with a non-obstructing colon adenocarci­noma presents for colectomy. He has a history of hyperten­sion, hyperlipidemia, and obesity. He walks his dogs most days around the block. The patient underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis. The proce­dure was uncomplicated. About 60min after being brought to the PACU, the patient becomes hypotensive to the 60s sys­tolic and tachycardic to the 140s. He is lethargic and com­plains of chest discomfort. A CBC drawn on arrival in PACU comes back as 10.5 from 11 pre-op.
Acute postoperative hypotension is caused by bleeding until proven otherwise. Always maintain a high index of suspicion for bleeding. While taking a patient back to the OR is a chal­lenging decision, it is almost never the wrong decision.

Bibliography

SCORE. https://surgicalcore.org. Townsend CM, etal., editors. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biologi-
cal basis of modern surgical practice. 21st ed. St. Louis: Elsevier;
2022.

Postoperative Fever

QuinnMurray andJoshuaA.Marks
127
Way Question May BeAsked?
Scenario 1
A 52-year-old man with a history of hypertension well­controlled on amlodipine presents for an elective left ingui­nal hernia repair with mesh under general anesthesia. The case was overall uncomplicated, estimated blood loss was less than 15 mL, and he awakened in the PACU uneventfully. Prior to moving to phase 2, his temperature was recorded at
100.7°F.Heart rate remains in the mid 80s, he remains nor­motensive, and respiratory rate is within normal limits and unlabored. He reports that he was asymptomatic aside from feeling groggy from anesthesia and now feels more so back to baseline.
How toAnswer?
• As always, start with a history and physical exam.
• This is a patient presenting with immediate postoperative fever without any truly concerning signs to back up a pathologic diagnosis requiring broad workup. Without any other changes in vital signs or symptoms, and without clear deviations from the operative course, this is a post­operative fever of likely little consequence and can be observed.
• One consideration that may be worth asking which is not included in the stem might be to ask “Has the patient voided urine postoperatively?” or “Has he required cath­eterization?” These inclusions may be hints of something more worthy of investigation, but nonetheless it would be unlikely to manifest as a fever this quickly.
• Atelectasis is classically considered the overall most common noninfectious cause of postoperative fever. Some sources question the pyrogenicity of atelectasis
Q. Murray · J. A. Marks (*) Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: joshua.marks@jefferson.edu
alone, however, and suggest looking for other causes to which to attribute a fever. Pneumonia may also occur in a similar timeframe and should be considered if chest radiograph shows an inltrate.
– Atelectasis is more common in the immediate and
early postoperative course. However, conditions that restrict mobility, or inadequate pain control, may pre­cipitate it outside of the early period.
– Atelectasis is a partial or complete collapse of alveoli,
and can present with hypoxia, tachypnea, and reduced breath sounds, or may be asymptomatic.
– Atelectasis can be reversed within 24–48 h with early
mobilization, regular incentive spirometer use, and chest physiotherapy, optimizing pain control; con­versely it may progress to pneumonia and cause fur­ther decompensation if not addressed with the therapies listed.
• SIRS (Systemic Inammatory Response Syndrome)
and non-infectious causes
– SIRS is dened by two or more of the following: tem-
perature greater than 36°C (96.8°F), heart rate greater than 90 bpm, respiratory rate greater than 20/min or PaCO2 less than 32 mmHg, and WBC either greater than 12,000 or less than 4000 with greater than 10% bands (Abdelmaseeh etal. 2023).
SIRS can be precipitated by direct trauma to tissues during surgery and is very common within the rst 48 h postoperatively, but as time progresses the eti­ology of SIRS must include a broadened differen­tial and stronger consideration of infectious etiologies. Tissue trauma causes a release of the pyogenic cytokine IL-1, levels of which correlate with a pro­portional increase in temperature. Other cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, and INF-γ are released in response to inammation and con­tribute to the changes seen in temperature regula­tion, heart rate, and laboratory abnormalities associated with SIRS.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_127
439
440
Q. Murray and J. A. Marks
Many electronic medical record systems utilize SIRS criteria to alert clinicians to potential clinical problems and/or deterioration. Would be sepsis sniffers and clinical deterioration scores are notori­ously overly sensitive in the surgical population and caution should be used in interpreting these results. One must always look to the patient directly and assess.
• Venous thromboembolism is a proposed “never event” and appropriate prophylaxis should be ordered to help prevent it. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) may cause fever due to clot burden and endothelial lining inamma­tion and/or injury. DVT is most likely to occur 2–10 days after surgery; however, the risk remains elevated for up to a month postoperatively.
– Important considerations for this complication are
type of surgery and duration of immobilization (ortho­pedic surgery, particularly spine procedures), presence or lack of perioperative DVT prophylaxis, and any missed or held doses.
– Physical exam may reveal unilateral leg swelling, ery-
thema, and calf tenderness, or it may be masked by edema or other patient-specic exam ndings.
– Pulmonary embolism (PE) generally occurs later but
has an overlapping timeframe with DVT, and concern­ing signs may include tachycardia, tachypnea, hypoxia, chest pain, and evidence of right heart strain on EKG and/or echocardiogram.
– Lower extremity duplex ultrasound is generally the
most reliable diagnostic tool for lower extremity DVT, and CT angiogram PE protocol of the chest is neces­sary if concern for PE exists.
– Treatment is with systemic anticoagulation, or IVC l-
ter if anticoagulation is contraindicated. Thrombolytics or thrombectomy in PE with hemodynamic compro­mise can be considered.
• Wound infection is more likely to manifest as fever around postoperative day 5–10. Wound or surgical site infections are classied as supercial, deep incisional, and organ space.
– A supercial incisional surgical site infection occurs
within the rst 30 days and includes at least one of the following: purulent drainage, organisms isolated from aseptically obtained culture of uid, pain, erythema, or swelling.
– Common causative organisms are Staphylococcus
aureus and other staph species, Streptococcus species, Enterococcus species, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter
species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Abdominal infections are more likely related to gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes. Diabetics are more likely to have polymicrobial wounds.
– Prevention includes skin prep with alcohol-based anti-
septic, glycemic control for blood glucose <200 mg/
dL, perioperative normothermia, and, if hair must be trimmed, using a clipper, and a not razor.
– Treatment includes opening wounds to allow infected
uid to drain. Antibiotics may not be necessary unless systemic signs of infection, such as tachycardia, leuko­cytosis >12,000, or erythema further than 5cm from wound edges, are present.
– If antibiotics are to be used, cultures should be obtained
to tailor treatment appropriately.
– A deep surgical site infection, including abscess,
infected hematoma, or seroma, requires drainage or, in rare cases, re-exploration, for source control.
• Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are the most common source of nosoco­mial bacteremia and septicemia and one of the pro­posed “never events” that are avoidable with appropriate indication, care, maintenance, and timely removal. Early diagnosis is critical to reduce morbid­ity and mortality. Organisms include staphylococci (both S. aureus and coagulase- negative staphylococci), enterococci, aerobic gram- negative bacilli, and fungal species (e.g., Candida albicans). Diagnosis requires positive peripheral blood culture with no apparent source besides the catheter, and clinical evidence of infection (fever, chills, hypotension). Treatment is with removal of catheter and antibiotics, generally empiric pending cultures, including vancomycin for MRSA coverage.
• Urinary tract infection is another common infectious cause of postoperative fever.
– More common in patients with pre-existing prostate
hypertrophy.
– Catheterization and other bladder instrumentation of
any kind during the perioperative period are recog­nized risk factors. A catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is another largely preventable entity with appropriate use, maintenance, and timely discontinuation.
– Foley catheters should always be removed as soon as it
is feasible to do so. Catheters should not be left in unnecessarily.
– A urinalysis and urine culture are diagnostic tools.
Antibiotics should be tailored to the classication of the condition as complicated or uncomplicated, catheter- associated or not, and hospital-acquired or not. The duration should be evidence based and de­escalated as more data is available.
• Drugs can be a source of fever if all other etiologies have been ruled out.
– This, like central fevers, is a diagnosis of exclusion. – Signs may include peripheral eosinophilia, rash, and/
or hives.
– Typical culprits are various antibiotics.