Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1232_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆

Burn Escharotomy

WendyY.Rockne andTheresaL.Chin
100

Burn Escharotomy

Concept

Full-thickness burns result in severely damaged, inexible dead tissue known as eschar. In the burn-injured patient with circumferential burns to the neck, trunk, or limbs, this stiff eschar can cause compromised circulation, unyielding com­partments, and/or limited respiratory function, resulting in immediate threat to life and limb (Zhang etal. 2023). The general surgeon must be able to promptly recognize and denitively manage burn-injury eschar via escharotomy to prevent serious morbidity and mortality in the burn-injured patient. Escharotomy should be performed after the primary and secondary survey. Rarely is it necessary to perform escharotomy during the primary survey.
Indications for Escharotomy
• Circumferential burns of the neck with resulting airway obstruction.
• Circumferential burns of the chest resulting in respiratory compromise.
• Circumferential burns of the abdomen with symptoms of intra-abdominal hypertension and/or abdominal compart­ment syndrome.
• Circumferential burns of the extremities, with or without symptoms of muscle compartment syndrome or tissue ischemia.
• Near-circumferential burns of the extremities with symp­toms of muscle compartment syndrome or tissue ischemia.
General Escharotomy Technique (Gillenwater and Garner 2020)
• Preserve normothermia. – Cover the patient as much as possible. Sequentially
uncover, fully release, and redress each affected body area to avoid full-body exposure and risk of hypother­mia.
– Administer pain medication and/or sedatives to the
patient.
• Plan incision to extend just barely beyond the burn into
normal skin.
– Mark out planned escharotomy incisions (if the patient
is stable and time allows).
• Divide through the full thickness of burned skin and
slightly into subcutaneous tissue to separate the dermal elements.
– Electrocautery is preferred for better hemostasis but
tissue can be divided sharply if emergent and electro­cautery is unavailable.
– Deep fascia should not be violated unless a fasciotomy
is necessary.
• Conrm adequacy of the release. – Return of function/perfusion to the affected area. – Released area should be diffusely soft without any
focal constrictions.
• Achieve meticulous hemostasis after verifying adequacy
of release.
– Can use electrocautery or suture ligation.
• Subsequently, dress and cover incision sites and burn
wounds.
Complications ofEscharotomy
Escharotomy, when done promptly and adequately, is a sim-
W. Y. Rockne · T. L. Chin (*) Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center,, Irvine, CA, USA e-mail: Wendy.Y.Rockne@uth.tmc.edu; chintl1@hs.uci.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_100
ple and safe surgical technique with few complications (Gillenwater and Garner 2020).
Most common complication: inadequate release. Less common: signicant bleeding from inadequate hemo-
stasis techniques/coagulopathy, injury to underlying
329
330
W. Y. Rockne and T. L. Chin
structures from poorly planned incisions/inadequate knowledge of surface anatomy.

Common Curve Balls

After escharotomy, function/perfusion is not restored to the affected body part.
Severe burns can involve the deep fascia. If adequate escha-
rotomies do not restore normal function/perfusion, fasci­otomies may be required.
After escharotomy, the underlying musculofascial com-
partments are tight/tense to palpation.
Musculofascial compartments should be soft and compress-
ible to palpation after escharotomy. If underlying muscu­lofascial compartments are tight to palpation after escharotomy, score the deep fascia to assess for muscle bulging, indicating the need for fasciotomy. Proceed with fasciotomies in the standard fashion if indicated.
A patient with an electrical burn injury develops signs/ symptoms of extremity compartment syndrome in a sepa­rate, nonburned extremity after you have performed escha­rotomy for a circumferential burn elsewhere.
Remember that bone has the highest resistance of any body
tissue and therefore generates the greatest amount of
heat when exposed to an electrical current, so the deep
tissues surrounding long bones are often the most heavily
damaged after high-voltage electrical injuries. Because
of this, severe burns and extremity compartment syn-
drome can be incurred without typical external signs of
burn injury. Do not miss the need for decompressive fas-
ciotomy in an electrical burn patient without external
signs!

Clean Kills

• Performing escharotomy prior to performing a primary
and secondary survey.
• Failing to recognize and immediately treat developing
compartment syndrome.
• Neglecting to adequately resuscitate the patient while
determining the need for escharotomy.
• Failure to preserve normothermia.
• Performing incomplete/inadequate escharotomy.
• Missing need for fasciotomy after escharotomy.
Circumferential Burns oftheExtremities

Concept

Circumferential full-thickness burns to extremities require escharotomy to prevent long-term neurological dysfunction. Near-circumferential burns of the extremities require close monitoring so that prompt escharotomy may be performed if signs of compartment syndrome develop (Cone and Inaba
2017).
How Question May BeAsked?
“A 19-year-old male patient presents to the emergency depart­ment with circumferential full-thickness burns to his bilateral lower extremities after jumping into boiling hot springs while hiking. First responders state that initially the patient had only mild pain in his legs, but now is complaining of excruciating pain in his legs and feet that worsens with movement.”
How toAnswer?
Take a brief history and physical examination while resusci­tating the patient
History
• Mechanism of injury involving circumferential burns to extremities (commonly ame, steam, explosion, submer­sion injuries).
• History of peripheral arterial disease, diabetes, previous extremity surgeries (higher risk of neurovascular compro­mise and abnormal baseline).
Physical Examination
• Primary Survey: Airway, breathing, circulation.
• Secondary Survey: Estimation of Total Body Surface Area (TBSA), initiation of burn resuscitation.
• Full-thickness circumferential or near-circumferential burns to extremities. Neurovascular exam of extremities
• Check for the 6Ps: pain, paresthesia, poikilothermia, pal­lor, paralysis, pulselessness (Cone and Inaba 2017). If present, escharotomy or fasciotomy are emergent.
Diagnostic Tests
Can be considered, but do not delay treatment for diagnostic labs, as the need for decompressive escharotomy in cases of circumferential extremity burns can be determined by physi­cal examination alone.
• Standard labs
• Neurovascular checks, distal pulses/signals of affected extremity
100 Burn Escharotomy
331
• Compartment pressure check (>30mmHg prompt urgent escharotomy of affected extremity)
• X Rays to rule out underlying fracture or other traumatic injury
Treatment
• Elevation of the extremity to reduce swelling.
• Judicious use of resuscitative uids.
Escharotomy oftheLower Extremity (Gillenwater andGarner 2020; Cone andInaba 2017)
1. Mark incisions along medial and lateral axis of lower
extremity (Fig.100.1)
• Place to avoid damage to underlying supercial struc­tures, including neck of bula (peroneal nerve), popli­teal fossa (neurovascular structures), posterior aspect of medial malleolus (posterior tibial artery and nerve).
• Spare greater/lesser saphenous veins and sural nerve if able.
2. Perform release along marked incisions sites using elec­trocautery as previously described.
• Can use scalpel for sharp release if performing emer-
gently at bedside
3. Recheck distal perfusion after release.
• Palpation or transcutaneous Doppler assessment of
dorsalis pedis artery, posterior tibial artery, and plantar arch
• Nail Bed capillary rell, pulse oximeter on toe
Escharotomy oftheArm andForearm1 (Fig.100.2)
1. Mark medial and lateral mid-axial incisions in continuous lines along length of arm and forearm
• Place to avoid damage to underlying supercial struc-
tures, including median epicondyle of the elbow (ulnar nerve), wrist (radial artery), antecubital fossa (brachial artery, cephalic/basilic/median cubital veins), and
medial bicipital groove (brachial artery). Remain supercial, only dividing the skin.
2. Perform release along marked incision sites using elec­trocautery as previously described.
3. Recheck distal perfusion after release.
• Palpation or transcutaneous Doppler assessment of
radial and ulnar arteries or palmar arch

Common Curveballs

Patient with deep circumferential burns of extremities with­out signs/symptoms of compartment syndrome. The patient then develops pulselessness of the distal extremity.
Patients with circumferential full-thickness burns of extremi-
ties should be considered for preemptive escharotomies, as the risk of compartment syndrome may be high in these patients.
Patient has near-circumferential deep burns to extremities
without signs/symptoms of compartment syndrome.
Patients with deep, near-circumferential burns to extremities
are at high-risk of developing compartment syndrome. Prophylactic escharotomies are NOT indicated in these patients. However, they must be closely monitored for the development of compartment syndrome with frequent neurovascular checks and/or compartment pressure mea­surements. Development of compartment syndrome is an indication of emergent escharotomy in these patients
(Cone and Inaba 2017).
Perfusion not restored after adequate escharotomy.
If distal perfusion remains impaired and/or underlying mus-
cle compartments are bulging or tense after ensuring adequate escharotomies, proceed with decompressive fasciotomies.
Fig. 100.1 Leg escharotomy sites, anterior view
Fig. 100.2 Arm escharotomy sites, posterior view
Patient becomes hypotensive.
Deeper burns and inhalation injury sequester more intravas-
cular volume due to inammatory mediators from burn injury contributing to overall hypovolemic shock. Consider the need for resuscitation, other traumatic injury, or abdominal compartment syndrome from over-resuscitation.

Clean Kills

• Failure to initiate resuscitation when indicated.
332
W. Y. Rockne and T. L. Chin
• Incomplete escharotomy.
• Missing need for fasciotomy after escharotomy.
• Failure to protect underlying neurovascular structures.
Circumferential Burns oftheChest or Abdomen

Concept

Circumferential burns of the chest may result in respiratory compromise including increased peak inspiratory pressures, hypoxia, and hypercapnia as chest wall compliance is com­promised by stiff eschar. Circumferential burns of the abdo­men can result in abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome, especially when combined with massive uid resuscitation in large burns. Bladder pressures, urine output, and peak airway pressures should all be closely monitored in these patients to allow early detection of abdominal compartment syndrome.
How Question May BeAsked (Example 1)
“A 33-year-old male presents to the emergency department after being extricated from a burning car. First responders report that the patient’s clothes had caught on re, and that the patient has deep burns to the front, back, and sides of his torso. The patient was maintaining oxygen saturations ini­tially, but pulse oximetry currently shows an O2 saturation of 89% despite supplemental oxygen and the patient states he feels like he cannot take deep breaths.”
How toAnswer?
Take a brief history and physical examination while resusci­tating the patient.
History
• Mechanism of injury involving burns to the chest, cloth­ing catching on re.
• Asthma, COPD history.
this case can be determined by physical examination alone.
• Standard labs, ABG, (but do not delay treatment).
• CXR to rule out pneumothorax, hemothorax, rib fractures.
Treatment
• ABCs
Escharotomy oftheTorso and/or Abdomen (Gillenwater andGarner 2020) (Fig.100.3)
1. Mark out planned incisions on chest wall and/or
abdomen.
• Incisions should include midaxillary lines, ventral midline, and subcostal margin.
• Anatomical landmarks for incisions: bilateral midaxil­lary lines, costal margins inferiorly, midline from ster­nal notch to subcostal margins.
2. Perform release along marked incision sites using elec­trocautery as previously described.
• Can use scalpel for sharp release if the patient is with
severe respiratory compromise and performing emer­gently at bedside
3. Assess adequacy of release.
• Symmetric bilateral excursion of chest wall with
ventilation
• Ventilation without impedance from burn wound
How Question May BeAsked (Example 2)
“A 56-year-old male patient was previously admitted to the ICU with an 80% TBSA and circumferential full-thickness burns to his torso. He is currently intubated and sedated. You are paged that the patient is having high peak inspiratory pressures and that his urine output has dropped off over the last few hours.”
Physical Examination
• Circumferential burns to chest, axilla, and back.
• Lack of chest wall movement during inspiration/ exhalation.
• Dyspnea, shortness of breath, sensation of chest constriction.
• Low oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry, cyanosis.
• High peak inspiratory pressures in intubated patient.
Diagnostic Tests
Can be considered, but do not delay treatment for diag­nostic labs, as the need for decompressive escharotomy in
Fig. 100.3 Torso escharotomies incisions
100 Burn Escharotomy
333
How toAnswer?
History
• Large TBSA burn, burn injury to abdomen, clothing catching on re
• Recent/ongoing large-volume uid resuscitation
Physical Examination
• Circumferential burns to abdomen
• Abdomen tight/tense to palpation
Diagnostic Tests
• Standard labs, ABG
• Bladder pressure (keep in mind, only accurate if patient is paralyzed)
• Reduced urine output
• Elevated peak airway pressures on ventilator
Treatment
• ABCs
Escharotomy oftheAbdomen (Gillenwater andGarner 2020)
1. Mark out planned abdominal incisions.
• Incisions should include midaxillary lines, ventral midline, and subcostal margin.
• Anatomical landmarks for incisions: bilateral midaxil­lary lines to anterior superior iliac spine, costal mar­gins superiorly, midline from costal margin to pubic symphysis (see illustration above).
2. Perform release along marked incisions sites using elec­trocautery as previously described.
• Can use scalpel for sharp release if performing emer-
gently at bedside.
3. Assess adequacy of release.
• Abdomen soft to palpation, free excursion with
respiration.
• Normalization of bladder pressure, peak airway pres-
sures if previously elevated.
• Adequate urine output.
In severe burns and/or burns with large TBSA percentage, mas-
sive uid resuscitation is often required. This can precipitate the development of extremity or abdominal compartment syndromes independent of circumferential burns. These high-risk patients require close monitoring, so that decom­pressive laparotomy or extremity fasciotomies may be per­formed in a timely fashion in appropriate cases.
Patient has continued symptoms of abdominal compart-
ment syndrome despite adequate escharotomy.
If a patient continues to have elevated peak airway pressures,
elevated bladder pressures, poor urine output, and a tense/ distended abdomen after adequate escharotomies (includ­ing additional relaxing incisions and crosshatching), they should undergo urgent decompressive laparotomy.

Clean Kills

• Incomplete escharotomy.
• Failure to initiate resuscitation.
• Failure to detect and promptly treat concurrent inhala­tional injury.
• Failure to detect and treat ongoing abdominal compart­ment syndrome after escharotomy.

Bonus Points

• Consider additional relaxing incisions or crosshatching of eschar if initial escharotomy incisions are not sufcient.
• If concerned for compartment syndrome of foot, perform dorsal release. Toe releases are generally not indicated.
• Pulselessness is one of the latest clinical signs of extrem­ity compartment syndrome, while pain is generally the earliest. Palpable pulses do not rule out extremity com­partment syndrome.

Common Curveballs

After escharotomy, chest wall compliance remains poor and chest movement is visibly restricted with ventilation.
If standard incisions do not fully decompress chest wall,
additional releasing incisions or crosshatching of the unreleased eschar may be necessary.
Patients with large TBSA but without circumferential burns develop signs of extremity or abdominal compartment syndrome.
Words ofWisdom
Patients with full thickness burns may require escharoto­mies. We open the eschar to allow for space for swelling which is inevitable. The escharotomies are ultimately removed when the burn is excised. Escharotomies are tem­porary treatments to improve compression on the nerves which can lead to neurologic compromise, and improve per­fusion to the muscles which can become ischemic.
Do not forget to resuscitate the patient and consider other causes of hypotension in the burn patient. Escharotomies are rarely emergent after injury. The body will need time to swell to cause pressure or compression.
334
W. Y. Rockne and T. L. Chin

Bibliography

Cone J, Inaba K. Lower extremity compartment syndrome. Trauma
Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;2:e000094.
Gillenwater J, Garner W. Eschartotomy in burns. In: Atlas of surgical
techniques in trauma. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University
Press; 2020. p.439–45. Zhang L, Labib A, Hughes PG.Escharotomy. In: StatPearls. Treasure
Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

Burn Sepsis

MalloryJebbia andTheresaL.Chin
101

Concept

The majority of questions will be related to management of sepsis related to wound infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Way aQuestion May BeAsked
“A 45-year-old man is admitted to the burn intensive care unit (ICU) for 50% total body surface area (TBSA) burns to the face, chest, back, and arms after a propane tank explo­sion. He is intubated and postoperative day 2 from his initial debridement. He developed fevers to 39.4°C and his white blood cell count increased from 9 to 15. He becomes tachy­cardic and hypotensive. How would you manage this patient?”
Be sure to go through your differential diagnosis (DDx) for fevers including atelectasis, pneumonia, venous throm­boembolism (VTE), urinary tract infection (UTI), wound infection, or drug-related fevers.
How toAnswer?
History
• Start with ABCs.
• Details of the burn:
– Partial or full thickness, TBSA (larger and deeper
burns have more insensible losses).
– Presence of inhalation injury (from prolonged smoke
inhalation) puts patients at higher risk for ventilator­associated pneumonia and ARDS.
– History of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
M. Jebbia · T. L. Chin (*) Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Burns, UC Irvine, Orange, CA, USA e-mail: mjebbia@hs.uci.edu; chintl1@hs.uci.edu
– History of immunosuppression. – Was there additional trauma—missed injury?
Physical Examination
• Check vital signs: look for fever, tachycardia, and hypotension.
• Check for swelling in all extremities (differential diagno­sis: deep venous thrombosis).
• Check for increasing oxygen requirements or changes in secretions (hypoxemia may lead to higher consideration of pneumonia as cause of sepsis).
• Examine wounds and look for signs of infection.
– Rapid change in appearance (loss of previously viable
tissue)
Most reliable sign of burn wound infection is con­version of an area of partial-thickness injury to full­thickness necrosis.
– Discoloration (green drainage may be from
Pseudomonas infection) – Pain – Purulence (may not be present in an infected burn
wound) – Exudate – Edema/swelling – Tenderness – Malodor – Peri-burn cellulitis
• Urine output as a marker of end-organ perfusion
Diagnostic Tests
• Full laboratory panel including lactate and/or base decit
• Blood/urine cultures (remember: as with any ICU patient, remove lines when no longer needed)
• Bronchoalveolar lavage or tracheal aspirate for culture
• Chest X-ray
• Wound culture (may need to send deep tissue cultures)
• Venous U/S duplex if concern for DVT
• CT scan to evaluate for intra-abdominal infection (if there is history of additional trauma)
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_101
335
336
M. Jebbia and T. L. Chin
Treatment
• Fluid resuscitation—30cc/kg bolus (burn patients have higher insensible losses than other patients).
• Antibiotics (broad spectrum, covering Staph aureus and Pseudomonas).
• Consider topical antimicrobial therapy.
• Control source—if wound might be the source, debride and excise necrotic tissue.
• Vasopressors to maintain end-organ perfusion until intra­vascular volume is restored.

Common Curveballs

Persistent hypotension or fevers after additional excisional debridement. Check for other sources of shock. Check cul­ture sensitivities to ensure adequate antibiotic coverage. If hypotension is persistent despite source control and adequate antibiotic coverage, consider adrenal insufciency. Consider hemorrhagic shock if there is a traumatic mechanism. Consider cardiogenic shock if there was blunt force to the chest or a patient at risk for cardiac events. Consider a pul­monary embolism or obstructive shock.
Alternate Scenario
A 45-year-old male is admitted to the burn ICU with 50% TBSA to the chest, abdomen, and extremities. He was intu­bated in the ED and is brought to the burn ICU for resuscita­tion. Twelve hours after admission, you are called by the nurse for hypotension. How do you proceed?
Don’t forget burn patients can become hypotensive from
third spacing uids and intravascular hypovolemia (in the setting of total body hypervolemia) and compartment syn­drome, not just infections! This patient has a large burn and could be experiencing hypotension from loss of intravascular volume or possibly abdominal compartment syndrome. See the patient, keep the differential broad, and then narrow it down. Do a focused exam—check the wounds (it is early in the hospital course for an infection but should be examined); look for signs of bleeding; listen to lung sounds to rule out pneumothorax. Check urine output for evidence of under­resuscitation. Check compartments and bladder pressures. If you are considering compartment syndrome, perform decompressive laparotomy. If the burn on the abdomen is full thickness with eschar, sometimes an escharotomy is war­ranted and will improve the hypotension; however if the hypotension does not improve, a decompressive laparotomy should be considered.
• No uid resuscitation
• No debridement of infected wound
• Not performing escharotomies or decompressive laparot­omy in cases of abdominal compartment syndrome
• Not considering or diagnosing other causes of shock

Summary

Burn sepsis is a cause of signicant mortality and should be recognized and managed quickly. Do not forget dif­ferentials for fevers and hypotension. Remember wind, water, walking, wound, and wonder drug. Check for compartment syndrome. In cases of refractory hypoten­sion without a found source, consider a missed injury from trauma (e.g., blast injury or associated fall) or adre­nal insufciency.
Some facts about burn sepsis:
• Incidence of sepsis in burn patients can range between 3 and 30% for burns more than 20% TBSA.
• Fifty-four percent of burn-related deaths occur due to sep­tic shock.
• The major cause of early burn wound infection is Staphylococcus aureus.
• On day 5–7 Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most com­mon cause of burn wound infection.
• Incidence of burn wound sepsis has declined from 6 to 1% since the practice of early burn wound debridement; however for patients with TBSA >15%, the incidence has remained the same.
• Highest rate of surgical burn wound infections occurs in the lower extremities.
• Patients with burn wounds also have high rates of other types of infection, such as catheter-related infection.

Bibliography

Jeschke MG, van Baar ME, Choudhry MA, Chung KK, Gibran NS,
Logsetty S.Burn injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):11. https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41572- 020- 0145- 5. PMID: 32054846; PMCID:
PMC7224101.
Stanojcic M, Abdullahi A, Rehou S, Parousis A, Jeschke
MG. Pathophysiological response to burn injury in adults. Ann Surg. 2018;267(3):576–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/
SLA.0000000000002097. PMID: 29408836; PMCID:
PMC8966302.
Zhang P, Zou B, Liou YC, Huang C.The pathogenesis and diagnosis
of sepsis post burn injury. Burns Trauma. 2021;9:tkaa047. https://
doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaa047. PMID: 33654698; PMCID:
PMC7901709.

Clean Kills

• Not getting cultures before starting empiric antibiotics

Cardiac Trauma

EricaRoth andChristinaL.Jacovides
102

Penetrating Cardiac Injury

Concept

The majority of questions will be related to addressing air­way, breathing, circulation (ABCs) in the initial trauma resuscitation and the time-sensitive identication of poten­tial injuries. Maintaining a differential diagnosis of potential life-threatening injuries and identifying them quickly is important. Nearly all penetrating chest wound scenarios will be operative. Recall the indications for an emergency depart­ment thoracotomy (EDT) and be able to describe the steps.
Way Question May BeAsked
A 25-year-old man presents to the trauma bay with a gunshot wound to the chest and unstable vital signs.
How toAnswer?
Initial Evaluation
In all trauma scenarios, start with the primary and secondary survey, using trauma bay adjuncts as necessary, to quickly identify life-threatening pathologies, including cardiac tam­ponade, tension pneumothorax, and hemorrhage. While some trauma surgeons advocate for rapid exposure and early roll of penetrating trauma patients to identify external wounds before proceeding with the ABCs, for the oral boards, remember that your examiners may not be trauma
E. Roth Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: erica.roth@emory.edu
C. L. Jacovides ( Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: christina.jacovides@tuhs.temple.edu
*)
surgeons themselves, so ensure that you adhere to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols and the ABCs.
Primary Survey
• Airway
– Assess the airway and prepare to intubate if the patient
is not protecting the airway.
– Avoid intubation if possible as induction may worsen
hemodynamics in a patient in shock.
• Breathing
– Assess for bilateral breath sounds and place the chest
tube if unequal; consider needle decompression prior to chest tube placement if the patient is unstable. Needle decompression may not decompress the chest in up to 40% of patients. Consider nger thoracostomy.
• Circulation
– Assess peripheral pulses; establish adequate intrave-
nous (IV) access.
– IV access should be either via two large-bore IVs or
Cordis placement. A triple lumen catheter will not allow for appropriately rapid administration of blood products and should not be your initial move for intra­venous access.
– Call for blood if there are any signs of hemorrhage.
Have a low threshold to activate a massive transfusion protocol (MTP).
• Disability
– Assess Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and
disability.
• Exposure
– Examine the patient fully to identify all external signs
of trauma.
– Injuries within the cardiac box (e.g., dened as an area
of the thorax bounded by the clavicles superiorly, the nipples laterally, and the xiphoid and costal margin inferiorly) elevate concern for a cardiac injury.
– Note that Beck’s triad for pericardial tamponade (muf-
ed heart sounds, hypotension, and jugular venous dis­tension) is not present in patients with cardiac injuries up to 25% of the time.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Neff et al. (eds.), Passing the General Surgery Oral Board Exam, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78244-2_102
337
338
E. Roth and C. L. Jacovides
Trauma Bay Adjuncts
• Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) – A FAST that is positive in the pericardial view is highly
suggestive of cardiac injury and mandates further intervention.
– A FAST that is negative in the pericardial window does
not completely rule out a cardiac injury, particularly if there is a concomitant hemothorax since the wound may violate the pericardium and decompress into either hemithorax.
– The FAST exam may also be limited by operator expe-
rience or by concomitant hemopneumothorax or sub­cutaneous emphysema that obscures the views.
• Chest X-ray (CXR) – CXR may identify hemothorax, pneumothorax, or
enlarged cardiac silhouette.
– In the setting of gunshot wounds, it may also identify
retained missiles that may help to determine the trajec­tory and associated injuries.
• Chest Computed Tomography (CT) – Chest CT should rarely if ever be used in a patient with
a signicant clinical concern for penetrating cardiac injury.
– If the patient is hemodynamically stable and there is a
low clinical suspicion for a hemodynamically signi­cant cardiac injury, CT can dene missile trajectory and identify potential injuries.
– Do not perform CT if the patient is hemodynamically
unstable, does not respond to initial resuscitation, or has a positive pericardial view on FAST exam. Most likely, it is not the appropriate maneuver in a patient with a cardiac injury, either on the boards or in real life.
Secondary Survey
• Once the primary survey and adjuncts are performed, a
rapid but complete head-to-toe assessment of the patient should be performed to ensure there are no additional external signs of trauma.

Treatment

Patients with penetrating thoracic trauma and a positive pericardial FAST should be managed in the operating room. Patients with a negative pericardial FAST and hemothorax on CXR likely require additional evaluation to rule out car­diac injury—either a pericardial window or a CT scan. Patients with a negative pericardial FAST and no hemotho­rax on CXR may not require operative intervention, although a CT scan may be performed to clarify the trajectory.
For a penetrating chest wound with a positive pericardial view on FAST in a hemodynamically stable patient, consider a pericardial window. There are three options for performing this:
Subxiphoid Pericardial Window
1. Make a 5–6cm vertical midline incision over the xiphoid process.
2. Dissect down to xiphoid and resect.
3. Dissect in the retrosternal plane down to the pericardium and grasp with two Allis clamps.
4. Position the patient in steep reverse Trendelenburg so that any pericardial uid is in a dependent location at the site of your incision.
5. Ensure that there is no blood in the operative eld and make a small cut between the two clamps.
6. If clear or minimal uid is evacuated, the pericardial win­dow is negative. If blood or clot is evacuated, the pericar­dial window is positive and further intervention is required.
Transdiaphragmatic Pericardial Window
1. Identify falciform ligament at its diaphragmatic reection.
2. Use a vertical incision to divide the diaphragm to the left of the falciform.
3. Dissect down to pericardium and grasp with two Allis clamps.
4. Position the patient in steep reverse Trendelenburg so that any pericardial uid is in a dependent location at the site of your incision.
5. Ensure that there is no blood in the operative eld and make a small cut between the two clamps.
6. If clear or minimal uid is evacuated, the pericardial win­dow is negative. If blood or clot is evacuated, the pericar­dial window is positive and further intervention is required.
Parasternal Pericardial Window
1. Make an incision in the fourth to fth intercostal space just to the left of the sternum.
2. Dissect down through the intercostal muscles to the pericardium.
3. Grasp the pericardium with two clamps.
4. Ensure that there is no blood in the operative eld and make a small cut between the two clamps.
5. If clear or minimal uid is evacuated, the pericardial win­dow is negative. If blood or clot is evacuated, the pericardial window is positive and further intervention is required.
If the pericardial window is positive and the patient is hemodynamically stable or if there is sufcient concern for cardiac injury that pericardial window is not deemed necessary:
Median Sternotomy
1. Make a vertical incision from the suprasternal notch to
the xiphoid process (or extend the incision from the inci­sion made for the pericardial window), and dissect down to the sternum.