Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5373_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
1 PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
Mohamed M, Abu Lila AS, Shimizu T, Alaaeldin E, Hussein A, Sarhan HA, Szebeni J, Ishida T
(2019) PEGylated liposomes: immunological responses. Sci Technol Adv Mater 20(1):710–724 Mollé LM, Smyth CH, Yuen D, Johnston APR (2022) Nanoparticles for vaccine and gene
therapy: overcoming the barriers to nucleic acid delivery. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed
Nanobiotechnol 14(6):e1809 Nascimento ÍF, Guimarães ATB, Ribeiro F, de Lima Rodrigues AS, Estrela FN, da Luz TM,
Malafaia G (2021) Polyethylene glycol acute and sub-lethal toxicity in neotropical Physalaemus
cuvieri tadpoles (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Environ Pollut 283:117054 Nguyen KG, Vrabel MR, Mantooth SM, Hopkins JJ, Wagner ES, Gabaldon TA, Zaharoff DA
(2020) Localized Interleukin-12 for cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol 11:575597 Nunes SS, de Oliveira Silva J, Fernandes RS, Miranda SEM, Leite EA, de Farias MA, Portugal
RV, Cassali GD, Townsend DM, Oliveira MC (2022) PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-
sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study. Pharmaceutics
14(2):272 Okyere D, Manso RH, Tong X, Chen J (2022) Stability of polyethylene glycol-coated copper
nanoparticles and their optical properties. Coatings 12(6):776 Padín-González E, Lancaster P, Bottini M, Gasco P, Tran L, Fadeel B, Wilkins T, Monopoli MP
(2022) Understanding the role and impact of poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) on nanoparticle
formulation: implications for COVID-19 vaccines. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:882363 Pandey M, Choudhury H, Gorain B, Tiong SQ, Wong GYS, Chan KX, They X, Chieu WS (2021)
Site-specic vesicular drug delivery system for skin cancer: a novel approach for targeting.
Gels 7(4):218 Pannuzzo M, Esposito S, Wu L-P, Key J, Aryal S, Celia C, Di Marzio L, Moghimi SM, Decuzzi
P (2020) Overcoming nanoparticle-mediated complement activation by surface PEG pairing.
Nano Lett 20(6):4312–4321 Park T, Lee S, Amatya R, Cheong H, Moon C, Kwak HD, Min KA, Shin MC (2020) ICG-
loaded pegylated BSA-silver nanoparticles for effective photothermal cancer therapy. Int J
Nanomedicine 15:5459–5471 Pasek-Allen JL, Wilharm RK, Bischof JC, Pierre VC (2023) NMR characterization of polyethyl-
ene glycol conjugates for nanoparticle functionalization. ACS Omega 8:4331–4336 Pham Le Khanh H, Nemes D, Rusznyák Á, Ujhelyi Z, Fehér P, Fenyvesi F, Váradi J, Vecsernyés M,
Bácskay I (2022) Comparative investigation of cellular effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG)
derivatives. Polymers (Basel) 14(2):279 Rabanel J-M, Adibnia V, Tehrani SF, Sanche S, Hildgen P, Banquy X, Ramassamy C (2019)
Nanoparticle heterogeneity: an emerging structural parameter inuencing particle fate in bio-
logical media? Nanoscale 11(2):383–406 Rinck PA (2019) Magnetic resonance in medicine: a critical introduction. BoD–Books on Demand,
Norderstedt Roces CB, Port EC, Daskalakis NN, Watts JA, Aylott JW, Halbert GW, Perrie Y (2020) Rapid
scale-up and production of active-loaded PEGylated liposomes. Int J Pharm 586:119566 Rondon A, Mahri S, Morales F, Dumoulin M, Vanbever R (2021) Protein engineering strategies for
improved pharmacokinetics. Adv Funct Mater 31:2101633 Sadalage PS, Patil RV, Havaldar DV, Gavade SS, Santos AC, Pawar KD (2021) Optimally bio-
synthesized, PEGylated gold nanoparticles functionalized with quercetin and campto-
thecin enhance potential anti-inammatory, anti-cancer and anti-angiogenic activities. J
Nanobiotechnol 19(1):1–17 Saikh MAA (2021) Aqueous lm coating the current trend. J Drug Deliv Therapeut 11(4-S):212–224 Sanchez Armengol E, Unterweger A, Lafeur F (2022) PEGylated drug delivery systems in the
pharmaceutical eld: past, present and future perspective. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 48(4):129–139 Sánchez-Cid P, Jiménez-Rosado M, Romero A, Pérez-Puyana V (2022) Novel trends in hydrogel
development for biomedical applications: a review. Polymers (Basel) 14(15):3023 Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Karishma S, Vo D-VN, Jeevanantham S, Yaashikaa P, George CS
(2021) A review on biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles and its environmental applications.
Chemosphere 264:128580
27
28
Sebak AA (2018) Limitations of PEGylated nanocarriers: unfavourable physicochemical prop-
erties, biodistribution patterns and cellular and subcellular fates. Int J Appl Pharmaceut
10(5):6–12 Selli D, Motta S, Di Valentin C (2019) Impact of surface curvature, grafting density and solvent
type on the PEGylation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 555:519–531 Shah Z, Nazir S, Mazhar K, Abbasi R, Samokhvalov IM (2019) PEGylated doped-and undoped-
TiO2 nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy of cancers. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther
27:173–183 Shahbazi R, Jafari-Gharabaghlou D, Mirjafary Z, Saeidian H, Zarghami N (2023) Design and
optimization various formulations of PEGylated niosomal nanoparticles loaded with phyto-
chemical agents: potential anti-cancer effects against human lung cancer cells. Pharmacol Rep
75:442–455 Siani P, Frigerio G, Donadoni E, Di Valentin C (2022) Molecular dynamics simulations of cRGD-
conjugated PEGylated TiO2 nanoparticles for targeted photodynamic therapy. J Colloid
Interface Sci 627:126–141 Simone EA (2008) Filamentous and spherical polymer nanocarriers for enzyme therapeutics.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Singh A, Neupane YR, Sha S, Mangla B, Kohli K (2020) PEGylated liposomes as an emerging
therapeutic platform for oral nanomedicine in cancer therapy: invitro and invivo assessment.
J Mol Liq 303:112649 Singhvi G, Rapalli VK, Nagpal S, Dubey SK, Saha RN (2020) Nanocarriers as potential targeted
drug delivery for cancer therapy. Springer, Cham, pp51–88 Teramura Y, Kuroyama K, Takai M (2016) Inuence of molecular weight of PEG chain on inter-
action between streptavidin and biotin–PEG-conjugated phospholipids studied with QCM-
D.Acta Biomater 30:135–143 Thakur S, Kesharwani P, Tekade RK, Jain NK (2015) Impact of pegylation on biopharmaceutical
properties of dendrimers. Polymer 59:67–92 Verma V, Kaushik D (2020) Mupirocin mounted copper nanoparticle offered augmented drug
delivery against resistant bacteria. Indian J Pharmaceut Educ Res 54:637–646 Walkowiak-Kulikowska J, Wolska J, Koroniak H (2020) Biopolymer membranes in fuel cell appli-
cations. In: Biopolymer membranes and lms. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp423–476 Yadav D, Dewangan HK (2021) Pegylation: an important approach for novel drug delivery system.
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 32(2):266–280 Yaqoob AA, Umar K, Ibrahim MNM (2020) Silver nanoparticles: various methods of synthesis,
size affecting factors and their potential applications—a review. Appl Nanosci 10:1369–1378 Yin IX, Zhang J, Zhao IS, Mei ML, Li Q, Chu CH (2020) The antibacterial mechanism of silver
nanoparticles and its application in dentistry. Int J Nanomedicine 15:2555–2562 Zaghmi A, Greschner AA, Mendez-Villuendas E, Liu JY, de Haan HW, Gauthier MA (2019)
Determination of the degree of PEGylation of protein bioconjugates using data from proton
nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Data Brief 25:104037 Zhang H, Wang W, Akinc M, Mallapragada S, Travesset A, Vaknin D (2017a) Assembling and
ordering polymer-grafted nanoparticles in three dimensions. Nanoscale 9(25):8710–8715 Zhang H, Wang W, Mallapragada S, Travesset A, Vaknin D (2017b) Macroscopic and tunable
nanoparticle superlattices. Nanoscale 9(1):164–171 Zhang Y, Wang P, Mao H, Zhang Y, Zheng L, Yu P, Guo Z, Li L, Jiang Q (2021) PEGylated gold
nanoparticles promote osteogenic differentiation in invitro and in vivo systems. Mater Des
197:109231 Zhang C, Xu C, Gao X, Yao Q (2022) Platinum-based drugs for cancer therapy and anti-tumor
strategies. Theranostics 12(5):2115 Zhao C, Ma Z, Zhu XX (2019) Rational design of thermoresponsive polymers in aqueous solu-
tions: a thermodynamics map. Prog Polym Sci 90:269–291 Zielińska A, Carreiró F, Oliveira AM, Neves A, Pires B, Venkatesh DN, Durazzo A, Lucarini M,
Eder P, Silva AM (2020) Polymeric nanoparticles: production, characterization, toxicology and
ecotoxicology. Molecules 25(16):3731
P. Pingale et al.
Methods andProtocols fortheSynthesis ofPEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
Ala’AdnanAli, RakeshKumarTekade, andRandaS.H.Mansour
Abstract
This chapter focuses on topics related to synthesizing PEGylated nanocarriers and
their characterization. The types of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) derivatives and con-
formation in addition to PEGylation techniques are detailed. Moreover, the methods
employed for synthesizing PEGylated nanocarriers are categorized and discussed in
detail. The methods explained are classied into self-assembly from PEG-containing
molecules by either nanoprecipitation or emulsication and surface modication of
nanocarriers with PEG chain covalently and noncovalently. Indirect assessments of
surface PEGylation efciency using particle size, surface hydrophilicity, zeta poten-
tial, etc. are emphasized, in addition to other methods used for direct assessments,
including colorimetric methods, chromatographic quantication methods, UV and
uorescence spectroscopy, and more. Finally, alternative polymers to PEG are briey
illustrated, as well as the challenges of nanocarriers PEGylation.
2
Keywords
PEGylated nanocarriers · Nanoprecipitation · Zeta potential · Polymers · Solvent
evaporation · Solvent diffusion · Chemical conjugation · Physical adsorption ·
Mushroom conformation · Brush conformation
A. A. Ali (*) Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
R. K. Tekade National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
R. S. H. Mansour Faculty of Pharmacy, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan
29
30
A. A. Ali et al.
Abbreviations
APTES Amino propyl triethoxy silane APTMS Amino propyl trimethoxy silane CDCl3 Deuterated chloroform Chln Cholane Chol Cholesterol CMC Critical micelle concentration D2O Deuterated water DLS Dynamic light scattering DMAP 4-Dimethylaminopyridin DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide DSPE Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine EDC N′-ethylcarbodiimide ELSD Evaporative light scattering detector FT-IR Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy G4-PAMAM Generation 4 poly(amidoamine) HIC Hydrophobic interaction chromatography HPLC High-pressure liquid chromatography LC Liquid chromatography mPEG Methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol) MS Mass spectrometry NA Nucleic acid NHS N-hydroxysuccinimide NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance PCL Poly(ε-caprolactone) PCS Photon correlation spectroscopy PEG Poly(ethylene glycol) PEI Poly(ethylene imine) PEO-PPO-PEO Polyethylene oxide-b-polypropylene oxide-b-polyethylene oxide PGA Poly(glutamic acid) PGs Poly(glycerols) PHDCA Poly(hexadecyl cyanoacrylate) PHEMA Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) PHPMA Poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate) PLA Poly(lactic acid) PLGA Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) PLL Poly(-lysine) POX Poly(oxazolines) PPG Poly(propylene glycol) PSA Polysebacic acid pSLN PEGylatec solid lipid nanoparticles PVL Poly(δ-valerolactone) PVP Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) RH Hydrodynamic radius”
2 Methods andProtocols fortheSynthesis ofPEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
31
RI Refractive index SEM Scanning electronic microscopy SLN Solid lipid nanoparticles SM Sphingomyelin TEA Triethanolamine TEM Transmission electron microscopy THF Tetrahydrofuran UV Ultra-violet XPS X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

2.1 Introduction

Several hydrophilic polymers have been utilized to coat the surface of nanocarriers, such as polysaccharides, polyacrylamide, poly(glycerols), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(oxazolines), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), and PEG-containing co-polymers. Among all the polymers, PEG and PEG-copolymer are the most commonly used and recognized as the gold standard. PEGylated nanocarriers have several advan­tages, such as avoidance of the nonspecic recognition by serum proteins, cells, tissues, and organs, reducing toxicity, and extending circulation time (Moghimi and Szebeni 2003; Vonarbourg etal. 2006).Therefore, PEGylated nanocarriers can be considered valid new pharmaceutical entities compared with their non-PEGylated counterparts.
PEGylation refers to attaching or coating the nanocarrier surface with PEG via adsorption, grafting, or entrapment methods (Howard etal. 2008). In recent few years, a considerable amount of research has been directed toward PEGylation chemistry, allowing the researcher to improve the PEGylation strategies from a “random” to a “site-specic” PEGylation. In addition, PEGylation is currently focused on using bifunctional PEG chains, which react from one side with the par­ticle surface and on the other side with a targeting agent.
The objectives of this chapter are to provide the readers with the methods and protocols of PEGylation, the tools to assess PEG surface quantitatively and qualita­tively, and the main alternative polymers to PEG.
2.1.1 Physical andChemical Properties ofPEG
PEG is a synthetic polymer of ethylene glycol (HO-CH2-CH2-OH) that is available in different molecular weights ranging from hundreds to several thousands of Daltons (Chen etal. 2005). PEGs have good water solubility that decreases with increases in chain lengths(Sanchez Armengol etal. 2022). PEGs with low molecu­lar weight (less than 800Daltons) are highly soluble in water and are liquids at room temperature (Chen etal. 2005).
32
A. A. Ali et al.
Different useful features make PEG one of the most popular polymers for modi­fying nanocarriers. PEG is soluble in both water and many organic solvents due to the presence of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups in its structure (Pasut and Veronese 2012). Moreover, the PEG molecule has high exibility due to the absence of a bulky substituent group on the PEG backbone (Mohapatra etal. 2019). Another feature of PEG is its distinctive stability against decomposition by acids, bases, moderately high temperatures, and hydrogen peroxide, oxidation, and reduction (Chen etal. 2005). In addition, PEG can be functionalized by selectively oxidizing the terminal OH group with various terminal end groups or by attaching large ligands, such as biomolecules (Karakoti etal. 2011).
The synthesis of PEG (Fig.2.1) involves a condensation polymerization where ethylene is reacted with aluminum oxide to obtain oxirane. Then, the polymeriza­tion of diethylene glycol as the starting molecule with oxirane takes place at 130°C in the presence of alkaline catalysts, as it eliminates water, subsequently the reac­tion is terminated by adding an acid (Li and Kao 2003).
2.1.2 Uses ofPEG
PEG has been widely used in biomedical applications, especially in pharmaceu­tics, due to its high solubility in aqueous media, good tolerance, biocompatibility, FDA- approved, and negligible interference with the drug release (Knop etal. 2010).
A breakthrough in PEGylation was the modication of albumin and catalase by Abuchowski in 1977, which decreased the immunogenicity of the proteins and increased their circulating time in blood (Abuchowski et al. 1977). The rst PEGylated nanocarrier introduced in 1995in the US market was Doxil®, a formula­tion of PEGylated liposomes of doxorubicin (Barenholz 2012). Later, various FDA­approved PEGylated products have emerged like cytokines (interferon-α2a and interferon-α2b), enzymes (bovine adenosine deaminase, Lasparginase, and urate oxidase), hormones (epoetin-β), antibodies and their fragments, other organic mol­ecules (pegvisomant and pegatinib), and others are in clinical trials (Pasut and Veronese 2009). In addition to enzymes and proteins, PEGylation has been widely utilized in the modication of nanocarriers delivery systems, including polymeric nanocarriers (Ebrahimnejad etal. 2011), liposomes (Allen etal. 1995), solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) (Yuan etal. 2013), and micelles (Lee etal. 2011). This results in improving their invivo stability and solubility, increasing their accumulation at the target site, and reducing their clearance rate from circulation (Torchilin 1998; Maruyama 2002).
Fig. 2.1 Synthesis of PEG. ((Sanchez Armengol etal. 2022) with permission) . ©Copyright 2022. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis)
2 Methods andProtocols fortheSynthesis ofPEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
33
2.1.3 Types ofPEG Derivatives
Diverse types of PEG derivatives with differences in shapes, functionality, and molecular weights affect the option of a suitable PEG moiety for therapeutic appli­cations (Mohapatra etal. 2019).
2.1.3.1 According totheShape ofthePolymer
According to the shape of the polymer, PEGs are classied into (Fig.2.2):
(a) Linear PEG derivatives: they are the simplest agents, having one reactive func-
tional group that aids in conjugation, and the other end is a methoxy group or a targeting molecule to make the PEG monofunctional. Also, bifunctional PEGs that have two functional groups (refers to Sect. 2.1.3.2) (Mohapatra etal. 2019).
(b) Y-shaped PEG derivatives: two linear PEG derivatives are linked to active
groups (Santos etal. 2018), they are characterized by higher invivo stability against physiological conditions like pH, temperature, and enzymatic environ­ment (Veronese etal. 1997).
(c) Forked PEG derivatives: they pose multi-proximal reactive groups at one or
both ends of a linear PEG chain (Veronese etal. 1997).
Fig. 2.2 Different-shaped PEGs. (a) Linear PEG. (b) Bifunctional PEG. (c) Y-shaped PEG. (d) Multi-arm PEG. (e) Fork-shaped PEG; providing at one PEG chain end multi-proximal reactive groups. (f) Fork-shaped PEG; providing at both PEG chains end multi-proximal reactive groups. ( ) represents functional groups of PEG derivatives
34
A. A. Ali et al.
(d) Multi-arm PEG derivatives: they are star-like structures with multi-hydroxyl or
functional groups. Thus, the number of active sites and molecular weight are higher (Kim etal. 2016).
2.1.3.2 According toFunctionality
PEG functionalization of nanocarriers can enhance the targeting, controlling the release of drugs from colloidal nanostructures (Howard etal. 2008), and increasing the invivo circulation half-life (Steenpaß etal. 2006). The structure of PEG pos­sesses two equivalent hydroxyl groups in which a variety of reactive functional groups or bioactive species can be attached by covalent coupling (Gajbhiye etal. 2007).
According to functionality, PEGs are classied into monofunctional PEGs and bifunctional PEGs. In monofunctional PEGs, one of the hydroxyl groups is replaced with a reactive functional group (Turecek etal. 2016). Examples of those functional groups are bromo, amino, carboxymethyl, succinimido succinate, tosylate, mesyl­ate, aldehyde, octadesylamine, monopalmitate, stearyl oxy, or methoxy (Harris 1985).
To illustrate, Steenpa etal. prepared monofunctional soy sterol-PEG1300 ethers by attaching a tresyl group to the end of the PEG chain. Then the PEG chain was attached to bovine serum albumin, and the sterol–PEG–protein formed was inserted into the outer liposome monolayer using the post-insertion method. This resulted in an increasing invivo circulation half-life of those particles (Steenpaß etal. 2006).
On the other hand, bifunctional PEGs have two reactive functional groups. They are usually used for cross-linking and conjugation of drugs, targeting ligands, dyes, and proteins.
Bifunctional PEGs could be homo-biofunctionalized or heterobifunctional. The homo-functionalized PEGs contain two similar functional groups, and the heterobi­functional PEGs include two different groups. An example of a linear heterobifunc­tional PEG is thiol-PEG-coumarin for functionalizing gold nanoparticle surfaces (Fig.2.3) (Fu etal. 2004).
2.1.4 PEG Conformations ontheNanocarrier Surface
PEG forms a exible layer on the surface of nanocarriers (Heald etal. 2002), block­ing the adsorption of opsonins (proteins) by steric hindrance (Drobek etal. 2005) and their consequent uptake by phagocytic cells (Storm etal. 1995). The PEG-chain
Fig. 2.3 Schematic representation of the functionalization of gold nanocarrier with coumarin PEG-thiol. ((Fu etal. 2004) with permission)
2 Methods andProtocols fortheSynthesis ofPEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
35
conformation on the particle surface is often described as a mushroom or a brush model (Amoozgar and Yeo 2012).
When the surface PEG density is low, it results in the mushroom state congura­tion. As the PEG density increases, it results in the brush state conguration (Tirosh etal. 1998) as in Fig.2.4.
The “mushroom” conguration has meager surface coverage, leading to large areas for protein binding. On the contrary, the “brush” conguration is character­ized by a very high surface coverage, which provides a higher anti-opsonization effect resulting in more effective binding, prolonging the circulation time of nano­carriers compared to the former (Photos etal. 2003).
The optimal PEG density varies by system. For example, for poly(lactic acid) (PLA) nanocarriers (Sheng etal. 2009) or poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nano­carriers 10wt.% PEG density was reported as optimal regarding particle dispers­ibility and stealth effect (Beletsi etal. 2005). However, Gref etal. considered that the optimal PEG surface density for PLA, PLGA, and polycaprolactone nanocarri­ers was 5wt.% and that any further increase in the levels of PEG content will not result in further reduction in protein adsorption (Gref etal. 2000).
In liposomes, a mushroom-like shape is obtained using <5% PEG, mushroom- or brush-like shape is obtained using 5–15% PEG, while >15% PEG gives a brush-like shape. Hence, the higher the molar PEG–lipid/lipid composition ratio, the higher the surface density (Nosova etal. 2019).
2.1.5 Types ofPEGylation Techniques
The key step of PEGylation is a conjugation of the PEG chains by different spacers or linkers with nanocarriers like polymeric nanocarriers, micelles, liposomes, or inorganic nanocarriers. Numerous derivatives of PEG (i.e., linear PEG and Y-shaped PEG) are used in the PEGylation techniques (Zacchigna etal. 2011; Chen et al.
2011). There are three types of PEGylation techniques: rst, second, and third
generations.
Fig. 2.4 PEG-chain conformations on the nanocarrier surface, ( ) represent PEG chains
36
In rst-generation PEGylation, linear and low molecular weight PEG is conju­gated with a reactive group with hydroxyl groups like carbonates, chlorides, and anhydrides (Damodaran and Fee 2010). This type of PEGylation results in non­specic random conjugations and is inefcient for protein conjugation. In second­generation PEGylation, branched structured PEG derivatives are used, which are more site-specic because more functional groups like esters, aldehydes, and amides are available (Damodaran and Fee 2010). In addition, branched PEGylation is more effective in diminishing immunogenicity and increasing the circulation time than linear PEG.On the other hand, it might affect the biomolecules’ activi­ties; therefore, the third generation is developed to conserve drug bioactivity (Monfardini et al. 1995). In third-generation PEGylation branched, Y-shaped structures revealed a reduction in viscosity and lack of organ accumulation (Singh 2015).
A. A. Ali et al.
2.2 Methods andProtocols fortheSynthesis
ofPegylated Nanocarriers
Due to variations in the chemical makeup, the methods and protocols used for the PEGylation of nanocarriers can be classied under polymeric nanocarriers, lipo­somes, micelles, and inorganic nanocarriers.
2.2.1 PEGylation ofPolymeric Nanocarriers
The chemistry of PEGylation of polymeric nanocarriers cannot be dened under a single heading, as that of proteins, due to high variance in the availability of functional groups and mode of preparation. PEGylation of a nanocarrier surface can be achieved in different ways (Fig.2.5), including the preparation of nano­carriers by self-assembly with block co-polymers of PEG and hydrophobic polymers (Gref etal. 1994). Otherwise, it can achieved by the addition of PEGs on preformed nanocarriers by physical adsorption or chemical conjugation of functional PEGs to the available surface reactive groups (Owens and Peppas 2006).
The main drawback of physical adsorption methods is the risk of desorption, the removal of the coating layer invivo, and consequent loss in pharmacokinetic out­comes that the polymer should provide (Neal etal. 1998). To overcome the desorp­tion, PEGylated nanocarriers are prepared by self-assembly using a modied derivative of polymers by choosing a proper method of nanoparticle preparation (emulsication and precipitation) in which the hydrophobic portions of PEG chains embedded inside the matrix of nanocarriers and hydrophilic portions orient toward the aqueous phase (Yoncheva etal. 2005). However, this does not ensure that PEG chains are localized only on the surface of nanocarriers, as PEGs may retain within the particle core (Vila etal. 2004). Therefore, the chemical conjugation method for PEGylation of nanocarriers’ surface is preferred.