Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5373_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
4 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDrug Delivery Applications
127
4.8.4 Unfavorable Cellular andSubcellular Fate
PEGylated NPs sometimes exhibit limited intracellular uptake signicantly lower
than non-PEGylated NPs, resulting from steric hindrance from polymer chains of
PEG and the hydrophilic nature of the surfaces of NPs. Hence, hydrophilic and
neutral NPs form of PEGylated NPs exhibit slower internalization in target cells
than Nps with charges (Oh and Park 2014; Mao etal. 2013). Therefore, despite
being able to prevent the isolation of drug-loaded NP by RES cells and increasing
extravasation of NPs through the unstable tumor vasculature, PEGylation reduces
target tissue interaction (Verhoef and Anchordoquy 2013), and inhibits endosomal
escape, leading to the loss of activity of some delivery systems like nucleic acid and
gene delivery systems in the treatment of cancer where the NPs degrade in the
acidic digestive medium of the endolysosomal system (Sebak 2018; Hatakeyama
etal. 2013).
4.8.5 Limited RES Evasion Capacity
Improper selection and optimization of PEG molecular weight and density, coatings
of PEG, and inadequate nanocarrier core properties could affect RES evasion capacity. Hence, despite the ability of PEG to provide steric hindrance and mask the surface charge of NPs, preventing opsonization, their ability to avoid this opsonization
has been shown to be limited, leading to several reports of opsonization and RES
clearance even after PEGylation (Sebak 2018; Verhoef and Anchordoquy 2013;
Wan etal. 2017; Zhang etal. 2016).
Reduced RES evasion capacity by PEGylated NPs could be caused majorly by
the production of anti-PEG antibodies, size enlargement of nanocarriers, and development of an immune response that leads to faster clearance of PEGylated NPs
from the bloodstream and removal of PEG from surfaces of NPs (Sebak 2018).
Particle Size Enlargement PEGylation of NPs leads to the particle size increase,
which could affect some pharmacokinetics of NPs and may also lead to an abnormal
reduction in the MRT of nanocarriers in blood, affecting RES avoidance by PEG
(Raei and Haddadi 2017; Xu etal. 2013).
Insufcient PEG Coating or Desorption of PEG Layer Improper surface coating of PEG or polymer desorption from the surface of NPs could present surfaces or
holes where opsonins can bind (Sebak 2018; Kettiger etal. 2013).
Immunogenicity of PEG PEG polymers were once known to be nonantigenic.
However, recent reports showed that they could develop an immune response, causing an effect known as the ABC phenomenon, because of the generation of antiPEG IgM antibodies produced from the spleen in response to a previous dose
128
S. A. Chime and M. A. Momoh
(Kettiger etal. 2013; Chen etal. 2016). These antibodies form a complex with other
serum components, resulting in more sequestration by RES (Verhoef and
Anchordoquy 2013; Zhang etal. 2014). It has been discovered that a second dose of
PEGylated injected liposomes exhibited poor circulation time and high accumulation in the spleen and liver, more than the rst dose (Zhang etal. 2014). Also, in 250
healthy blood donors screened, isotypes of anti-PEG antibodies of both IgG and
IgM were discovered in 25%. This could be due to increased exposure of the masses
to PEG-containing pharmaceutical and cosmetics products for a prolonged period
of time (Sebak 2018; Hatakeyama etal. 2013). This explains the loss of activity that
could occur with repeated dosing of PEGylated products.
4.9 Conclusion
Nanocarriers consist of polymeric and lipid-based NPs arrays with different constituents, formulation methods, and functionalities. Adequate selection of the particular type of NP to coat with PEG for effective and enhanced NP properties is
essential to achieve better results with PEGylation. Also, proper preformulation
studies should be carried out to choose an optimized coating composition in terms
of PEG MW, density, and layer of coating to avoid desorption that could lead to the
failure of PEGylated NPs and abnormal functioning in the body. PEGylation of NPs
remains an area for scientists to explore further so that all the advantages embodied
in these nanocarriers and PEG polymers can be utilized for better treatment of diseases of man and better treatment outcomes.
PEGylation has become an essential aspect of drug delivery utilized effectively
in the formulation of challenging delivery systems used to treat many chronic and
life-threatening illnesses like different forms of cancers. Its use in the formulation
of herbal formulations and nutraceuticals is yet to be fully explored; hence, it should
be an area for future development. Also, methods and processes that will prevent the
problems encountered in the coating of NPs to avoid RES reversal and developing
antiPEG antibodies are all areas under study.
References
Abdellatif AAH, Alsowinea AF (2021) Approved and marketed nanoparticles for disease targeting
and applications in COVID-19. Nanotechnol Rev 10:1941–1977
Abuchowski A, Van Es T, Palczuk NC, Davis FF (1977) Alteration of immunological proper-
ties of bovine serum albumin by covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol. J Biol Chem
252:3578–3581
Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WC (2012) The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chem-
istry on biological systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14:1–16
Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, Farokhzad OC (2008) Factors affecting the clearance and biodis-
tribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 5:505–515
Andriyanov AV etal (2017) Therapeutic efcacy of combined PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin
and radiofrequency ablation: comparing single and combined therapy in young and old mice.
J Control Release 257:2–9
4 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDrug Delivery Applications
Arima Y, Toda M, Iwata H (2008) Complement activation on surfaces modied with ethylene
glycol units. Biomaterials 29:551
Auriola SO, Ronkko KM, Urtti A (1993) Determination of polyethylene glycols by high-
performance liquid chromatographythermospray mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed
Anal 11:1027
Baban DF, Seymour LW (1998) Control of tumour vascular permeability. Adv Drug Deliv Rev
34:109–119
Bhadra D, Bhadra S, Jain P, Jain NK (2002) Pegnology: a review of PEGylated systems.
Pharmazie 57:5–29
Braeckmans K, Buyens K, Bouquet W, Vervaet C, Joye P, De Vos F, Plawinski L, Doeuvre L,
Angles-Cano E, Sanders NN, Demeester J, De Smedt SC (2010) Sizing nanomatter in biologi-
cal uids by uorescence single particle tracking. Nano Lett 10:4435–4442
Braet F, Wisse E, Bomans P, Frederik P, Geerts W, Koster A, Soon L, Ringer S (2007) Contribution
of high-resolution correlative imaging techniques in the study of the liver sieve in three-
dimensions. Microsc Res Tech 70:230–242
Brigger I, Chaminade P, Desmaële D, Peracchia MT, d’Angelo J, Gurny R, Renoir M, Couvreur
P (2000) Near infrared with principal component analysis as a novel analytical approach for
nanoparticle technology. Pharm Res 17:1124
Brigger I, Dubernet C, Couvreur P (2002) Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Adv
Drug Deliv Rev 54(5):631–651
Brooking J, Davis SS, Illum L (2001) Transport of nanoparticles across the rat nasal mucosa. J
Drug Target 9:267–279
Buyens K etal (2012) Liposome based systems for systemic siRNA delivery: stability in blood sets
the requirements for optimal carrier design. J Control Release 158(3):362–370
Calv OP, Gouritin B, Chacun H, Desmaële D, D’Angelo J, Noel JP, Georgin D, Fattal E, Andreux
JP, Couvreur P (2001) Long circulating PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles as new
drug carrier for brain delivery. Pharm Res 8(8):1157–1166
Calvo P, Gouritin B, Chacun H, Desmaele D, D’Angelo J, Noel JP, Georgin D, Fattal E, Andreux
JP, Couvreur P (2001) Long circulating PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles as new
drug carrier for brain delivery. Pharm Res 18:1157–1166
Chen F, Yin G, Liao X, Yang Y, Huang Z, Gu J (2013) Preparation, characterization and in vitro
release properties of morphine-loaded PLLA-PEG-PLLA microparticles via solution enhanced
dispersion by supercritical uids. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24:1693–1705
Chen BM, Su YC, Chang CJ, Burnouf PA, Chuang KH, Chen CH etal (2016) Measurement of
pre-existing IgG and IgM antibodies against polyethylene glycol in healthy individuals. Anal
Chem 88:10661–10666
Cheng T-L, Cheng C-M, Chen B-M, Tsao D-A, Chuang K-H, Hsiao S-W, Lin Y-H, Rofer SR
(2005) Monoclonal antibody-based quantitation of poly(ethylene glycol)-derivatized proteins,
liposomes, and nanoparticles. Bioconjug Chem 16:1225–1231
Chime SA, Ugwu CE, Ejiofor EU, Onunkwo GC (2022) Application of Cyperus esculentus oil in
the development of sustained release diclofenac sodium-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier. J
Curr Biomed Res 2(3):145–159
Chime SA, Kenechukwu FC, Attama AA (2014) Nanoemulsions—advances in formulation, char-
acterization and applications in drug delivery. In: Application of nanotechnology in drug deliv-
ery. InTech, London, pp77–126. https://doi.org/10.5772/15371
Cho K, Wang X, Nie S, Chen Z, Shin DM (2008) Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in
cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14(5):1310–1316
Choi CH, Zuckerman JE, Webster P, Davis ME (2011) Targeting kidney mesangium by nanopar-
ticles of dened size. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:6656–6661
Chuang KH, Tzou SC, Cheng TC, Kao CH, Tseng WL, Shiea J, Liao KW, Wang YM, Chang YC,
Huango BJ, Wu CJ, Chu PY, Rofer SR, Cheng TL (2010) Measurement of poly(ethylene gly-
col) by cell-based anti-poly(ethylene glycol) ELISA.Anal Chem 82:2355–2362
Churae NV, Nikologorskaja EA (1991) Brownian and electrophoretical mobility of silica particles
coated with absorbed layers of polyethylenoxides. Colloids Surf 59:71
129
130
Cone RA (2009) Barrier properties of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:75–85
Craparo EF, Cavallaro G, Bondi ML, Mandracchia D, Giammona G (2006) PEGylated nanopar-
ticles based on a polyaspartamide. Preparation, physico-chemical characterization, and intra-
cellular uptake. Biomacromolecules 7:3083
Cu Y, Saltzman WM (2009) Controlled surface modication with poly(ethylene)glycol enhances
diffusion of PLGA nanoparticles in human cervical mucus. Mol Pharm 6:173–181
Dawidczyk CM, Kim C, Park JH, Russell LM, Lee KH, Pomper MG, Searson PC (2014) State-
of- the-art in design rules for drug delivery platforms: lessons learned from FDA-approved
nanomedicines. J Control Release 187:133–144
Deepa Y, Hitesh KD (2020) PEGylation: an important approach for novel drug delivery system. J
Biomater Sci Polym Ed 32:266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1825304
Dobrovolskaia MA, Aggarwal P, Hall JB, McNeil SE (2008) Preclinical studies to understand
nanoparticle interaction with the immune system and its potential effects on nanoparticle bio-
distribution. Mol Pharm 5:487–495
Dunn SE, Brindle A, Davis SS, Davies MC, Illum L (1994) Polystyrene-poly(ethylene glycol)
(PS-PEG2000) particles as model systems for site specic drug delivery. 2. The effect of PEG
surface density on the invitro cell interaction and invivo biodistribution. Pharm Res 11:1016
Eliyahu H, Servel N, Domb AJ, Barenholz Y (2002) Lipoplex-induced hemagglutination: potential
involvement in intravenous gene delivery. Gene Ther 9:850–858
Ensign LM, Schneider C, Suk JS, Cone R, Hanes J (2012) Mucus penetrating nanoparticles: bio-
physical tool and method of drug and gene delivery. Adv Mater 24:3887–3894
Ensign LM, Henning A, Schneider CS etal (2013) Ex vivo characterization of particle transport in
mucus secretions coating freshly excised mucosal tissues. Mol Pharm 10:2176–2182
Fang C, Shi B, Pei YY, Hong MH, Wu J, Chen HZ (2006) In vivo tumor targeting of tumor necrosis
factor-alpha-loaded stealth nanoparticles: effect of MePEG molecular weight and particle size.
Eur J Pharm Sci 27:27–36
Ferrara N (2005) VEGF as a therapeutic target in cancer. Oncology 69(3):11–16
Fischer D, Li Y, Ahlemeyer B, Krieglstein J, Kissel T (2003) In vitro cytotoxicity testing of
polycations: inuence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysis. Biomaterials
24:1121–1131
Francis GE, Delgado C, Fisher D, Malik F, Agrawal AK (1996) Polyethylene glycol modication:
relevance of improved methodology to tumour targeting. J Drug Target 3(5):321–340
Gajbhiye V, Vijayarajkumar P, Rakesh T, Jain NK (2007) Pharmaceutical and biomedical potential
of PEGylated dendrimers. Curr Pharm Design 13:415–429
Gajbhiye KR, Pawar A, Mahadik KR, Gajbhiye V (2020 Mar) PEGylated nanocarriers: a promis-
ing tool for targeted delivery to the brain. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 187:110770. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110770
Garcia-Fuentes M, Torres D, Martín-Pastor M, Alonso MJ (2004) Application of nmr spectroscopy
to the characterization of pegstabilized lipid nanoparticles. Langmuir 20:8839
Gauchel G, Huppertz B, Feiertag H, Keller R (2003) Clinical use of polyethylene glycols as
marker substances and determination in urine by liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B
Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 787:271
Gessner A, Waicz R, Lieske A, Paulke B, Mader K, Muller RH (2000) Nanoparticles with decreas-
ing surface hydrophobicities: inuence on plasma protein adsorption. Int J Pharm 196:245–249
Giannavola C, Bucolo C, Maltese A, Paolino D, Vandelli MA, Puglisi G, Lee VH, Fresta M (2003)
Inuence of preparation conditions on acyclovir-loaded poly-d,l-lactic acid nanospheres and
effect of PEG coating on ocular drug bioavailability. Pharm Res 20:584–590
Govender T, Stolnik S, Garnett MC, Illum L, Davis SS (1999) PLGA nanoparticles prepared by
nanoprecipitation: drug loading and release studies of a water soluble drug. J Control Release
57:171–185
Govender T, Riley T, Ehtezazi T etal (2000) Dening the drug incorporation properties of PLA-
PEG nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 199:95–110
S. A. Chime and M. A. Momoh
4 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDrug Delivery Applications
Gref R, Domp A, Quellec P, Blunk T, Muller RH, Verbavatz JM, Langer R (1995) The controlled
intravenous delivery of drugs using PEG coated sterically stabilized nanospheres. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev 16:215–233
Gref R, Luck M, Quellec P, Marchand M, Dellacherie E, Harnishch S, Blunk T, Muller RH (2000)
‘Stealth’ corona-core nanoparticles surface modied by polyethylene glycol (PEG): inuences
of the corona (PEG chain length and surface density) and of the core composition on phago-
cytic uptake and plasma protein adsorption. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 18(3–4):301–313
Gu F, Zhang L, Teply BA, Mann N, Wang A, Radovic-Moreno AF, Langer R, Farokhzad OC
(2008) Precise engineering of targeted nanoparticles by using self-assembled biointegrated
block copolymers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2586–2591
Haris JM (1992) Poly (ethylene glycol) chemistry: biotechnical and biomedical applications.
Plenum Press, NewYork, p228
Harrington KJ, Rowlinson-Busza G, Uster PS, Stewart JS (2000) Pegylated liposome- encapsulated
doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of head and neck xenograft tumours. Cancer
Chemother Pharmacol 46(1):10–18
Hatakeyama H, Akita H, Harashima H (2013) The polyethyleneglycol dilemma: advantage and
disadvantage of PEGylation of liposomes for systemic genes and nucleic acids delivery to
tumors. Biol Pharm Bull 36:892–899
Howard MD, Jay M, Dziubla TD, Lu X (2008) PEGylation of nanocarrier drug delivery systems:
state of the art. J Biomed Nanotechnol 4(2):133–148
Hrkach J, Von Hoff D, Ali MM, Andrianova E, Auer J, Campbell T, De Witt D, Figa M, Figueiredo
M, Horhota A, Low S, McDonnell K, Peeke E, Retnarajan B, Sabnis A, Schnipper E, Song JJ,
Song YH, Summa J, Tompsett D, Troiano G, Hoven TVG, Wright J, LoRusso P, Kantoff PW,
Bander NH, Sweeney C, Farokhzad OC, Langer R, Zale S (2012) Preclinical development and
clinical translation of a PSMA-targeted docetaxel nanoparticle with a differentiated pharmaco-
logical prole. Sci Transl Med 4:4
Hu FX, Neoh KG, Cen L, Kang ET (2006) Cellular response to magnetic nanoparticles “PEGylated”
via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 7:809
Huang YB, Leobandung W, Foss A, Peppas NA (2000) Molecular aspects of muco- and bioadhe-
sion: tethered structures and site-specic surfaces. J Control Release 65:63–71
Illum L (2000) Transport of drugs from the nasal cavity to the central nervous system. Eur J Pharm
Sci 11:1–18
Jain NK, Manoj N (2010) PEGylated nanocarriers for systemic delivery. In: Grobmyer SR,
Moudgil BM (eds) Cancer nanotechnology. Methods in molecular biology, vol 624. Springer
Science+Business Media, LLC, Berlin, pp221–234
Jarvinen K, Jarvinen T, Urtti A (1995) Ocular absorption following topical delivery. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev 16:3–19
Jie P, Venkatraman SS, Min F, Freddy BY, Huat GL (2005) Micelle-like nanoparticles of star-
branched PEO-PLA copolymers as chemotherapeutic carrier. J Control Release 110:20
Jokerst JV, Lobovkina T, Zare RN, Gambhir SS (2011) Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and
therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond) 6:715–728
Karnik R, Gu F, Basto P, Cannizzaro C, Dean L, Kyei-Manu W, Langer R, Farokhzad OC
(2008) Microuidic platform for controlled synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles. Nano Lett
8:2906–2912
Karra N, Benita S (2012) The ligand nanoparticle conjugation approach for targeted cancer ther-
apy. Curr Drug Metab 13(1):22–41
Kaur H, Das T, Kumar R, Ajore R, Bharadwaj LM (2008) Biosystems 92:69–75
Kenechukwu FC, Attama AA, Ibezim EC, Nnamani PO etal (2018) Novel intravaginal drug deliv-
ery system based on molecularly pegylated lipid matrices for improved antifungal activity of
miconazole nitrate. Biomed Res Int 2018:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3714329
Kettiger H, Schipanski A, Wick P, Huwyler J (2013) Engineered nanomaterial uptake and tissue
distribution: from cell to organism. Int J Nanomedicine 8:3255–3269
131
132
Khosravi-Darani K, Pardakhty A, Honarpisheh H, Rao VS, Mozafari MR (2007) The role of high-
resolution imaging in the evaluation of nanosystems for bioactive encapsulation and targeted
nanotherapy. Micron 38:804
Klibanov AL, Maruyama K, Torchilin VP, Huang L (1990) Amphipathic polyethyleneglycols
effectively prolong the circulation time of liposomes. FEBS Lett 268:235–237
Lai SK, O'Hanlon DE, Harrold S, Man ST, Wang YY, Cone R, Hanes J (2007) Rapid transport
of large polymeric nanoparticles in fresh undiluted human mucus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
104:1482–1487
Lai SK, Wang YY, Hanes J (2009) Mucus-penetrating nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to
mucosal tissues. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:158–171
Lai SK, Suk JS, Pace A, Wang YY, Yang M, Mert O, Chen J, Kim J, Hanes J (2011) Drug carrier
nanoparticles that penetrate human chronic rhinosinusitis mucus. Biomaterials 32:6285–6290
Lee VH (1990) Protease inhibitors and penetration enhancers as approaches to modify peptide
absorption. J Control Release 13:213–223
Lee GK, Maheshri N, Kaspar B, Schaffer DV (2005) PEG conjugation moderately protects adeno-
associated viral vectors against antibody neutralization. Biotechnol Bioeng 92:24–34
Li YP, Pei YY, Zhang XY, Gu ZH, Zhou ZH, Yuan WF, Zhou JJ, Zhu JH, Gao XJ (2001)
PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles as protein carrier; synthesis, preparation and bio distribu-
tion in rats. J Control Release 71:203–211
Liu F, Liu DX (1996) Serum independent liposome uptake by mouse liver. BBA-Biomembranes
1278:5–11. [PubMed: 8611606]
Liu M, Xie C, Xu W, Lu W (2004) Separation of polyethylene glycols and their amino- substituted
derivatives by high-performance gel ltration chromatography at low ionic strength with
refractive index detection. J Chromatogr A 1046:121
Liu F, Sun Y, Kang C, Zhu H (2016) Pegylated drug delivery systems: from design to biomedical
applications. Nano LIFE 6(3 and 4):1642002
Liu X, Shen X, Sun X, Peng Y, Li R, Yun P, Li C, Liu L, Su F, Li S (2018) Polym Adv Technol
29:205–215
Lowe S, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Connal LA (2015) Antibiofouling polymer interfaces:
poly(ethylene glycol) and other promising candidates. Polym Chem 6:198–212
Mao Z, Zhou X, Gao C (2013) Inuence of structure and properties of colloidal biomaterials on
cellular uptake and cell functions. Biomater Sci 1:896
Martens TF, Vercauteren D, Forier K, Deschout H, Remaut K, Paesen R, Ameloot M, Engbersen
JF, Demeester J, De Smedt SC, Braeckmans K (2013) Measuring the intravitreal mobility of
nanomedicines with single-particle tracking microscopy. Nanomedicine (Lond) 8:1955–1968
Marwa M, Eman A, Amal H, Hatem AS (2020) Liposomes and PEGylated liposomes as drug
delivery systems. J Adv Biomed Pharm Sci 3:80–88
Mastorakos P, Zhang C, Berry S, Oh Y, Lee S, Eberhart CG, Woodworth GF, Suk JS, Hanes J
(2015) Highly PEGylated DNA nanoparticles provide uniform and widespread gene transfer in
the brain. Adv Healthc Mater 4:1023
Matsumura Y, Maeda H (1986) A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemo-
therapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs.
Cancer Res 46:6387–6392
Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC (2001) Long-circulating and target-specic nanoparticles:
theory to practice. Pharmacol Rev 53:283–318
Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA (2012) Biomolecular coronas provide the biologi-
cal identity of nanosized materials. Nat Nanotechnol 7:779–786
Mozar FS, Chowdhury EH (2018) Impact of PEGylated nanoparticles on tumor targeted drug
delivery. Curr Pharm Des 24:3283–3296
Mumper RJ, Cui Z, Oyewumi MO (2003) Nanotemplate engineering of cell specic nanoparticles.
J Dispers Sci Technol 24(3–4):569–588
Nair LM, Konkel J, Thomas M, Koberda M (2006) Comparison of electrospray ionization mass
spectrometry and evaporative light scattering detections for the determination of Poloxamer
188in itraconazole injectable formulation. J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:725–730
S. A. Chime and M. A. Momoh
4 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDrug Delivery Applications
Nakamura K, Yamashita K, Itoh Y, Yoshino K, Nozawa S, Kasukawa H (2012) Comparative stud-
ies of polyethylene glycol-modied liposomes prepared using different PEG-modication
methods. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818:2801–2807
Nance EA, Woodworth GF, Sailor KA, Shih TY, Xu Q, Swaminathan G, Xiang D, Eberhart C,
Hanes J (2012) A dense poly(ethylene glycol) coating improves penetration of large polymeric
nanoparticles within brain tissue. Sci Transl Med 4:4 149ra119
Nance E, Timbie K, Miller GW, Song J, Louttit C, Klibanov AL, Shih TY, Swaminathan G,
Tamargo RJ, Woodworth GF, Hanes J, Price RJ (2014a) Non-invasive delivery of stealth, brain-
penetrating nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier using MRI-guided focused ultrasound.
J Control Release 189:123–132
Nance E, Zhang C, Shih TY, Xu Q, Schuster BS, Hanes J (2014b) Brain-penetrating nanoparticles
improve paclitaxel efcacy in malignant glioma following local administration. ACS Nano
8:10655–10664
Oh N, Park JH (2014) Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J
Nanomedicine 9:51–63
Ou W, Thapa RK, Jiang L, Soe ZC, Gautam M, Chang JH etal (2018) Regulatory T cell-targeted
hybrid nanoparticles combined with immuno-checkpoint blockage for cancer immunotherapy.
J Control Release 281:84–96
Owens DE III, Peppas NA (2006) Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of poly-
meric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 307(1):93–102
Pai AS, Rubinstein I, Onyuksel H (2006) PEGylated phospholipid nanomicelles interact with beta-
amyloid(1-42) and mitigate its beta beta-sheet formation, aggregation and neurotoxicity in
vitro. Peptides 27(11):2858–2866
Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF etal (2018) Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments
and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnol 16(71):1–33
Peracchia MT, Authier CV, Desmaële D, Gulik A, Dedieu J-C, Demoy M, d’Angelo J, Couvreur
P (1998) PEGylated nanoparticles from a novel methoxypolyethylene glycol cyanoacrylate-
hexadecyl cyanoacrylate amphiphilic copolymer. Pharm Res 15:550
Perrault SD, Walkey C, Jennings T, Fischer HC, Chan WC (2009) Mediating tumor targeting ef-
ciency of nanoparticles through design. Nano Lett 9:1909–1915
Perry JL, Reuter KG, Kai MP, Herlihy KP, Jones SW, Luft JC, Napier M, Bear JE, DeSimone JM
(2012) PEGylated PRINT nanoparticles: the impact of PEG density on protein binding, macro-
phage association, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics. Nano Lett 12:5304–5310
Petersen H, Fechner PM, Martin AL, Kunath K, Stolnik S, Roberts CJ, Fischer D, Davies MC,
Kissel T (2002a) Polyethylenimine-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymers: inuence of copo-
lymer block structure on DNA complexation and biological activities as gene delivery system.
Bioconjug Chem 13:845–854
Petersen H, Fechner PM, Fischer D, Kissel T (2002b) Synthesis, characterization, and biocom-
patibility of polyethylenimine-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymers. Macromolecules
35:6867–6874
Pinheiro RGR, Coutinho AJ, Pinheiro M, Neves AR (2021) Nanoparticles for targeted brain drug
delivery: what do we know? Int J Mol Sci 22:11654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111654
Rabanel JM, Hildgen P, Banquy X (2014) J Control Release 185:71–87
Raei P, Haddadi A (2017) Docetaxel-loaded PLGA and PLGA-PEG nanoparticles for intravenous
application: pharmacokinetics and biodistribution prole. Int J Nanomedicine 12:935–947
Roser M, Fischer D, Kissel T (1998) Surface-modied biodegradable albumin nano- and micro-
spheres. II: effect of surface charges on invitro phagocytosis and biodistribution in rats. Eur J
Pharm Biopharm 46:255–263
Rukmani R, Willi P, Chandra PS (2009) Synthesis and characterization of PEGylated calcium
phosphate nanoparticles for oral insulin delivery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
88(1):41–48
Sahlin JJ, Peppas NA (1997) Enhanced hydrogel adhesion by polymer interdiffusion: use of linear
poly(ethylene glycol) as an adhesion promoter. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 8:421–436
133
134
Sahoo SK, Labhasetwar V (2003) Nanotech approaches to drug delivery and imaging. Drug
Discov Today 8(24):1112–1120
Salvati A, Pitek AS, Monopoli MP, Prapainop K, Bombelli FB, Hristov DR, Kelly PM, Aberg
C, Mahon E, Dawson KA (2013) Transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles lose their targeting
capabilities when a biomolecule corona adsorbs on the surface. Nat Nanotechnol 8:137–143
Sebak AA (2018) Limitations of PEGylated nanocarriers: unfavourable physicochemical proper-
ties, biodistribution patterns and cellular and subcellular fates. Int J App Pharm 10(5):6–12
Serra L, Domenech J, Peppas NA (2006) Design of poly(ethylene glycol)-tethered copolymers as
novel mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 63:11–18
Shi L, Zhang J, Zhao M, Tang S, Cheng X, Zhang W, Li W etal (2021) Effects of polyethylene
glycol on the surface of nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Nanoscale 13:10748–10764
Shubik P (1982) Vascularization of tumors: a review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 103(3):211–226
Sinha R, Kim GJ, Nie S, Shin DM (2006) Nanotechnology in cancer therapeutics: bioconjugated
nanoparticles for drug delivery. Mol Cancer Ther 5:1909–1917
Su Y-C, Chen B-M, Chuang K-H, Cheng T-L, Rofer SR (2010) Sensitive quantication of
PEGylated compounds by second-generation anti-poly(ethylene glycol) monoclonal antibod-
ies. Bioconjug Chem 21:1264–1270
Sudarshan S, Holman DH, Hyer ML etal (2005) In vitro efcacy of Fas ligand gene therapy for
the treatment of bladder cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 12(1):12–18
Suk JS, Lai SK, Wang YY, Ensign LM, Zeitlin PL, Boyle MP, Hanes J (2009) The penetration
of fresh undiluted sputum expectorated by cystic brosis patients by non-adhesive polymer
nanoparticles. Biomaterials 30:2591–2597
Suk JS, Kim AJ, Trehan K, Schneider CS, Cebotaru L, Woodward OM, Boylan NJ, Boyle MP, Lai
SK, Guggino WB, Hanes J (2014) Lung gene therapy with highly compacted DNA nanopar-
ticles that overcome the mucus barrier. J Control Release 178:8–17
Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign ML (2016) PEGylation as a strategy for improving
nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 99(Pt A):28–51
Sutradhar KB, Amin M (2014) Nanotechnology in cancer drug delivery and selective targeting.
Nanotechnology 2014:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/939378
Suzawa T, Shirahama H (1991) Adsorption of plasma proteins onto polymer latices. Adv Colloid
Interface Sci 35:139
Tami BHC, Lasseter L, Abbott NL, Hamers RJ (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:10220–10221
Tenzer S, Docter D, Kuharev J, Musyanovych A, Fetz V, Hecht R, Schlenk F, Fischer D, Kiouptsi
K, Reinhardt C, Landfester K, Schild H, Maskos M, Knauer SK, Stauber RH (2013) Rapid
formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. Nat
Nanotechnol 8:772–781
Thorne RG, Nicholson C (2006) In vivo diffusion analysis with quantum dots and dextrans pre-
dicts the width of brain extracellular space. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:5567–5572
Tobio M, Gref R, Sanchez A, Langer R, Alonso MJ (1998) Stealth PLA-PEG nanoparticles as
protein carriers for nasal administration. Pharm Res 15:270–275
Tobio M, Sanchez A, Vila A, Soriano I, Evora C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ (2000) The role of PEG
on the stability in digestive uids and invivo fate of PEG– PLA nanoparticles following oral
administration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 18(3–4):315–323
Torchilin VP (2005) Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat Rev Drug
Discov 4:145–160
Torchilin VP (2007) Targeted pharmaceutical nanocarriers for cancer therapy and imaging. AAPS
J 9(2):E128–E147
Torchilin V, Weissig V (2003) Liposomes: a practical approach, 2nd edn. Oxford University
Press, Oxford
Unsworth LD, Sheardown H, Brash JL (2008) Protein-resistant poly(ethylene oxide)-grafted sur-
faces: chain density-dependent multiple mechanisms of action. Langmuir 24:1924–1929
Uster PS, Allen TM, Daniel BE, Mendez CJ, Newman MS, Zhu GZ (1996) Insertion of
poly(ethylene glycol) derivatized phospholipid into pre-formed liposomes results in prolonged
invivo circulation time. FEBS Lett 386:243–246
S. A. Chime and M. A. Momoh
4 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDrug Delivery Applications
Valencia PM, Hanewich-Hollatz MH, Gao W, Karim F, Langer R, Karnik R, Farokhzad OC (2011)
Effects of ligands with different water solubilities on self-assembly and properties of targeted
nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32:6226–6233
van den Berg JH, Oosterhuis K, Hennink WE, Storm G, van der Aa LJ, Engbersen JF, Haanen JB,
Beijnen JH, Schumacher TN, Nuijen B (2010) Shielding the cationic charge of nanoparticle-
formulated dermal DNA vaccines is essential for antigen expression and immunogenicity. J
Control Release 141:234–240
van der Meel R, Vehmeijer LJ, Kok RJ, Storm G, van Gaal EV (2013) Ligand-targeted par-
ticulate nanomedicines undergoing clinical evaluation: current status. Adv Drug Deliv Rev
65:1284–1298
Verhoef JJF, Anchordoquy TJ (2013) Questioning the use of PEGylation for drug delivery. Drug
Deliv Transl Res 3:499–503
Veronese FM, Mero A (2008) The impact of PEGylation on biological therapies. BioDrugs
22(5):315–329
Vllasaliu D, Fowler R, Garnett M etal (2011) Barrier characteristics of epithelial cultures modelling
the airway and intestinal mucosa: a comparison. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 415:579–585
Vllasaliu D, Fowler R, Snow S (2014) PEGylated nanomedicines: recent progress and remaining
concerns. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 11(1):139–154
Vonarbourg A, Passirani C, Saulnier P, Benoit JP (2006) Parameters inuencing the stealthiness of
colloidal drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 27:4356–4373
Walkey CD, Olsen JB, Guo H, Emili A, Chan WC (2012) Nanoparticle size and surface chemistry
determine serum protein adsorption and macrophage uptake. J Am Chem Soc 134:2139–2147.
[PubMed: 22191645]
Wan X, Zhang J, Yu W, Shen L, Ji S, Hu T (2017) Effect of protein immunogenicity and PEG size
and branching on the anti-PEG immune response to PEGylated proteins. Process Biochem
52:183–191
Wang YY, Lai SK, Suk JS, Pace A, Cone R, Hanes J (2008) Addressing the PEG mucoadhesivity
paradox to engineer nanoparticles that “slip” through the human mucus barrier. Angew Chem
Int Ed 47:9726–9729
Weaver EA, Barry MA (2008) Effects of shielding adenoviral vectors with polyethylene glycol
on vector-specic and vaccine-mediated immune responses. Hum Gene Ther 19:1369–1382
Webb MS, Saxon D, Wong FM, Lim HJ, Wang Z, Bally MB, Choi LS, Cullis PR, Mayer LD
(1998) Comparison of different hydrophobic anchors conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol):
effects on the pharmacokinetics of liposomal vincristine. Biochim Biophys Acta 1372:272
Xia X, Yang M, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Li Q, Chen J, Xia Y (2012) Quantifying the coverage density
of poly(ethylene glycol) chains on the surface of gold nanostructures. ACS Nano 6:512–522
Xiao X-F, Jiang X-Q, Zhou L-J (2013) Chin J Anal Chem 41:445–453
Xie Z, Ji Z, Zhang Z, Gong T, Sun X (2014) Adenoviral vectors coated with cationic PEG deriva-
tives for intravaginal vaccination against HIV-1. Biomaterials 35:7896–7908
Xu J, Gattacceca F, Amiji M (2013) Biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of EGFR-targeted thio-
lated gelatin nanoparticles following systemic administration in pancreatic tumour-bearing
mice. Mol Pharm 10:2031–2044
Xu Q, Ensign LM, Boylan NJ, Schon A, Gong X, Yang J-C, Cai S, Yu T, Freire E, Hanes J (2015)
Impact of surface polyethylene glycol (PEG) density on biodegradable nanoparticle transport
in mucus exvivo and distribution invivo. ACS Nano 9:9217–9227
Yang Q, Lai SK (2015) Anti-PEG immunity: emergence, characteristics, and unaddressed ques-
tions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 7:655
Yang Q, Jones SW, Parker CL, Zamboni WC, Bear JE, Lai SK (2014a) Evading immune cell
uptake and clearance requires PEG grafting at densities substantially exceeding the minimum
for brush conformation. Mol Pharm 11:1250–1258
Yang X, Wu S, Wang Y, Li Y, Chang D, Luo Y etal (2014b) Evaluation of self-assembled HCPT-
loaded PEG-b-PLA nanoparticles by comparing with HCPT-loaded PLA nanoparticles.
Nanoscale Res Lett 9:1–8
135
136
Yang YS, Moynihan KD, Bekdemir A, Dichwalkar TM, Noh MM, Watson N etal (2018) Targeting
small molecule drugs to T cells with antibody-directed cellpenetrating gold nanoparticles.
Biomater Sci 7(1):113–124
Yezhelyev MV, Gao X, Xing Y, Al-Hajj A, Nie S, O’Regan RM (2006) Emerging use of nanopar-
ticles in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 7(8):657–667
Yildirimer L, Thanh NT, Loizidou M, Seifalian AM (2011) Toxicology and clinical potential of
nanoparticles. Nano Today 6:585–607
Yoo JW, Chambers E, Mitragotri S (2010) Factors that control the circulation time of nanoparticles
in blood: challenges, solutions and future prospects. Curr Pharm Des 16:2298–2307
Yoon JY, Kim JH, Kim WS (1998) Interpretation of protein adsorption phenomena onto functional
microspheres. Colloid Surf B 12:15–22
Yuan H, Chen CY, Chai GH, Du YZ, Hu FQ (2013) Improved transport and absorption through
gastrointestinal tract by PEGylated solid lipid nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 10:1865–1873
Zabaleta V, Campanero MA, Irache JM (2007) An HPLC with evaporative light scattering detec-
tion method for the quantication of PEGs and Gantrez in PEGylated nanoparticles. J Pharm
Biomed Anal 44:1072–1078
Zhan X, Tran KK, Shen H (2012) Effect of the poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) density on the access
and uptake of particles by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) after subcutaneous administration.
Mol Pharm 9:3442–3451
Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM, Wang AZ, Langer RS, Farokhzad OC (2007) Nanoparticles in medi-
cine: therapeutic applications and developments. Clin Pharmacol Ther 83:761
Zhang F, Liu M, Wan H (2014) Discussion about several potential drawbacks of PEGylated thera-
peutic proteins. Biol Pharm Bull 37:335–339
Zhang P, Sun F, Liu S, Jiang S (2016) Anti-PEG antibodies in the clinic: current issues and beyond
PEGylation. J Control Release 244:184–191
Ziemba B, Matuszko G, Bryszewska M, Klajnert B (2012) Inuence of dendrimers on red blood
cells. Cell Mol Biol Lett 17:21–35
Zillies JC, Zwiorek K, Winter G, Coester C (2007) Method for quantifying the PEGylation of
gelatin nanoparticle drug carrier systems using asymmetrical ow eld-ow fractionation and
refractive index detection. Anal Chem 79:4574–4580
S. A. Chime and M. A. Momoh