Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5373_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •PEGylated Nanocarriers in Medicine and Pharmacy
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •About the Editors
- •Contributors
- •1.1.3.1 Passive Targeting Agent
- •1.1.3.2 Solubility Enhancers
- •1. PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
- •1.1 PEGylation
- •1.1.1 PEG Characteristics
- •1.2 PEGylation Determination
- •1.2.2.1 Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
- •1.2.2.2 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •1.2.2.4 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •1.3.1 Nanoparticulate System
- •1.3.1.1 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •1.3.1.2 Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs)
- •1.3.1.3 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2 Metal Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.1 Silver Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.2 Gold Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.3 Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.4 Copper Nanoparticles
- •1.3.3 Vesicular Systems
- •1.3.3.1 Liposomes
- •1.3.3.2 Niosomes
- •1.3.3.3 Ethosomes
- •1.4.1 Cancer
- •1.4.2 Gene Delivery
- •1.4.3 Diagnostics Imaging
- •1.4.4 Vaccines
- •1.4.5 Rheumatoid Arthritis
- •1.4.6 Hemophilia
- •1.4.7 Pain Therapy
- •1.4.8 Diabetes
- •1.4.9 Others
- •1.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •Nanoprecipitation (Solvent Diffusion)
- •Emulsification (Solvent Evaporation or Nanoemulsion)
- •Physical Adsorption Strategy
- •2.2.2.1 Pre-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.2.2.2 Post-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.3.1 Indirect Assessment (Qualitative Assessment)
- •2.3.1.1 Particle Size
- •2.3.1.2 Zeta Potential
- •2.3.1.3 Surface Hydrophilicity
- •2.3.1.4 Microscopic Techniques
- •2.3.1.5 Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •2.3.2 Direct Assessment (Quantitative Assessment)
- •2.3.2.1 Colorimetric Methods
- •2.3.2.2 Chromatographic Methods
- •2.3.2.4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •2.3.2.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Characterization Techniques
- •3.3 Infrared Spectroscopy
- •3.4 Raman Spectroscopy
- •3.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •3.6 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
- •3.7 Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
- •3.8 Mass Spectroscopy (MS)
- •3.9 Thermogravimetric Analysis
- •3.10 Differential Scanning Calorimetry
- •3.11 Atomic Force Microscopy
- •3.12 Scanning Electron Microscopy
- •3.13 Transmission Electron Microscopy
- •3.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3.1 Nanoparticles PEGylation
- •4.3.2 Polyplexes (PP) PEGylation
- •4.5.1 Systemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2 Nonsystemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2.3 PEGylated Intravaginal Nanocarriers
- •4.5.2.6 Vaccines Entrapped PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •4.6.2 PEG Molecular Weight (MW)
- •4.7 PEGylated Nanocarriers Products
- •4.8.3 Disadvantageous Physicochemical Properties
- •4.8.5 Limited RES Evasion Capacity
- •4.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.2 PEG Solubility Characteristics
- •5.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Small Molecule Drugs
- •5.3 Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.3.2 Organic Solvent–Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.4.1 Water-Soluble PEGylated Silicon Nanocarriers
- •5.4.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Carbon Nanotubes
- •5.4.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Dendrimers
- •5.4.5 Water-Soluble PEGylated Polymeric Micelles
- •5.5 Hydrated or Hydrophilic PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.5.1 Hydrated PEGylated Lipid Nanocarriers
- •5.5.2 Hydrophilic PEG-Coated Zein Nanocarriers
- •References
- •5.6.4.1 PEG Chain Length/Molecular Weight
- •6.1 Introduction
- •Increased Solubility
- •Improved Stability
- •Reduced Immunogenicity
- •Enhanced Circulation Time
- •Heterogeneity
- •6.3.1 Enhancing Immune Responses
- •6.3.2 Suppressing Immune Responses
- •6.3.3 Immune Evasion
- •6.4.1 Strategies to Overcome Immunological Barriers
- •6.4.1.1 PEGylation
- •6.4.1.2 Cell Membranes
- •6.4.1.3 Carbohydrates
- •6.4.1.4 Proteins
- •6.6.1 Cancer Therapy
- •6.6.2 Gene Therapy
- •6.6.3 Immunotherapy
- •6.6.4 Central Nervous System (CNS) Drug Delivery
- •6.6.5 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •6.6.6 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •6.6.7 Cardiovascular (CVS) Drug Delivery
- •6.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.3 Nanocarrier-Based Targeted Drug Delivery
- •7.4.1 Covalent Approach
- •7.4.2 Non-covalent Approach
- •7.4.2.1 PEGylation Via Monovalent Interactions
- •High-Affinity Host-Guest Interactions
- •7.4.2.2 PEGylation Via Multivalent Interactions
- •PEGylated Block Copolymers
- •PEGylated Graft Copolymers
- •Polyelectrolyte Complex-Based Systems
- •Non-ionic Interaction-Based Systems
- •PEGylated Dendritic Copolymers
- •PEGylated Copolymers Utilizing Mobile Side Groups
- •7.5 Various Targeting Strategies
- •7.5.1 Active Targeting
- •7.5.2 Passive Targeting
- •7.5.2.1 PEG Dilemma
- •7.7.1 Brain Disorders
- •7.7.2 Pulmonary Disorders
- •7.7.3 Cancer
- •7.7.4 Inflammatory Disorders
- •7.7.5 Bone Disorders
- •7.7.6 Blood Disorders
- •7.8 Stimuli-Sensitive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1 External-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.1 Ultrasound-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.2 Thermal-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.3 Magnetic Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2 Internal-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.4 Hypoxia-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.3 Multimodal Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 PEGylated Liposome
- •8.3.2 PEGylated Micelles
- •8.3.3 PEGylated Nanogels
- •8.3.4 PEGylated Inorganic Nanoparticles
- •8.3.5 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •8.4.1 Cancer
- •8.4.1.1 Breast Cancer
- •8.4.1.2 Lung Cancer
- •8.4.1.3 Colon Cancer
- •8.4.1.4 Brain Cancer
- •8.4.2 Autoimmune Diseases
- •8.4.3 Inflammatory Disorders
- •8.4.4 Cardiovascular Diseases
- •8.4.5 Ocular Diseases
- •8.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.4.1.1 Amino Acid Modifications
- •9.4.1.3 Cysteine Thiol Residue Conjugation
- •9.4.2 Releasable PEGs
- •9.7.1.1 Cationic Lipid Toxicology
- •9.8 RNA Lipid Nanoparticle
- •9.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.2.1 PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •10.2.1.1 Polymeric NPs
- •10.2.1.2 Liposomes
- •10.2.1.3 Dendrimers
- •10.2.1.4 Polymeric Micelles
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Factors Influencing PPDs’ Short-Term Efficiency
- •11.2 What Is PEGylation?
- •11.3.1 Random PEGylation
- •11.3.2 Site-Specific PEGylation
- •11.3.2.1 Amine Conjugation
- •11.3.2.2 Cysteine Conjugation
- •11.4.1 Binding Affinity
- •11.4.2 Altered Biological Activity
- •11.4.3 Physicochemical Modifications
- •11.4.4 PEG Size
- •11.4.5 PEG Structure
- •11.6 PK Profiling
- •11.9 FDA-Approved PEGylated Products
- •11.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.1.2 Current Market Scenario
- •12.2.1 PEGylated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 PEGylated Lipid-Based NPs
- •13.2.2 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •13.2.3 PEGylated Metal-Based Nanoparticles
- •13.2.4 Multifunctional PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.2.5 Targeted PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.3.1 Surface Modification Chemistry
- •13.3.2 Polymer Chemistry
- •13.3.4 Characterization Techniques
- •13.4.1 Longer Circulation Time
- •13.4.2 Enhanced Cellular Uptake
- •13.4.3 Controlled Drug Release
- •13.5.1 Cancer Theragnostic
- •13.5.2 Cardiovascular Theragnostic
- •13.7.2 Prolonged Circulation Time
- •13.7.3 Improved Drug Delivery
- •13.7.4 Diagnostic Functionality
- •13.8 Technical Challenges
- •13.8.4 Limited Clinical Validation
- •13.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Reversible PEGylation Strategies
- •14.2.1 Reversible PEGylation Chemistry
- •14.2.2.1 Aromatic Linkers
- •14.2.2.2 Aliphatic Linkers
- •14.2.3 Cleavage Linkers
- •14.2.3.1 Hydrolyzable Linkers
- •14.2.3.2 Enzymatically Cleavable Linkers
- •14.2.4 pH-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.4.1 Proteasome Inhibitor MG132
- •14.2.5 Temperature-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.6 Light-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.3.1 Analytical Techniques
- •Zeta Potential
- •Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC)
- •Near Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy
- •Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •13C-NMR
- •Mass Spectrometry
- •High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •Calorimetry
- •X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •TGA-DSC
- •14.3.2.1 Protein Adsorption
- •14.3.2.2 Cellular Association
- •14.3.2.5 Bioactivity Assay
- •14.3.2.6 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
- •14.3.2.7 Sandwich ELISA
- •14.3.2.8 Anti-PEG ELISA
- •14.3.3.1 In Vivo Blood Circulation Half-Life
- •14.3.3.2 Radiolabeling
- •14.4.1 Therapeutic Applications
- •14.4.1.1 Anticancer Activity
- •14.4.1.2 Antibiotic Administration
- •14.4.1.3 Enzyme-Replacement Therapy
- •14.4.1.4 Red Blood Cell Substitution
- •14.4.1.5 Oxygen Toxicity Diseases
- •14.4.2 Pharmaceutical Applications
- •14.4.2.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •14.4.2.2 PEGylated Proteins
- •14.4.2.3 Targeted Delivery
- •14.5.1 Design Complexity
- •14.5.3 Biological Environment Stability
- •14.5.4 Trigger Selection
- •14.5.5 Immunogenicity
- •14.5.6 Scale-up Difficulties
- •14.5.8 Cost
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15. Stimuli-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 External Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.2.1 Thermoresponsive Systems
- •15.2.2 Magnetically Responsive Systems
- •15.2.3 Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.4 Light-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.5 Electroresponsive Systems
- •15.3 Internal Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.4 Self-Regulated Systems
- •15.4.3 Multistimuli Responsive Systems
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 PEGylated Products
- •16.3.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •16.3.2 PEGylated G-CSF
- •16.3.3 PEGylated Proteins
- •16.3.4 PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.5.1 Poly(Zwitterions)
- •16.5.2 Poly(Glycerols)
- •16.5.3 Poly(Amino Acids)
- •16.5.4 Poly(Oxazolines)
- •16.5.6 Poly(Vinylpyrrolidones)
- •16.5.8 Polypeptides
- •16.5.9 Carbohydrate-Based Systems
- •16.5.10 Hydrophilic Polymers
- •16.5.11 Non-PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.6 Future Prospects
- •16.7 Conclusion
- •References

12 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDiagnostic Applications
357
macrophage recognition and clearance and extending their duration in circulation.
Regardless of the method of delivery, in vivo investigations have shown that
PEGylated NPs have minimal adverse impact on various cell lines. PEGylation has
been recognized as a particularly efcient and biocompatible way for decreasing
renal clearance (Huang etal. 2014) (Fig.12.4).
PEG-AuNPs have a negative charge, various biomolecules, including pharmaceuticals, genes, and targeting ligands, that can easily functionalize them. Surface
plasmon resonance (SPR) bands are present in PEG-AuNPs, which also have an
ultra-small size, a macroscopic quantum tunnelling effect, and a distinct surface
effect. PEG-AuNPs conrm the most promising material for a variety of biomedical
applications, such as biosensing, molecular imaging, drug carriers, and so on (Kong
etal. 2017).
Synthesized PEG-AuNPs have highly unique plasmonic features that enable the
detection of various compounds using SER spectroscopy, which can be done on
solid spots or in liquid droplets. The SER spectra obtained using this new class of
nanoparticles on various molecules of interest (methylene blue, rhodamine 6G,
doxorubicin, and 5-uorouracil) are highly reproducible due to their distinctive
plasmonic properties, making them excellent candidates for further use as SERS
substrates (Nițică etal. 2018).
Due to the unique properties of AuNPs, they have long been thought of as a possible tool for cancer diagnostics and delivery of drug applications. Among these
characteristics are a high surface area-to-volume ratio, stable nature, surface plasmon resonance, surface chemistry, and ease of synthesis. Additionally, the nontoxic and non-immunogenic properties of AuNPs as well as their EPR effect offer
additional benets by making it simple for drugs to penetrate and accumulate at
tumor sites. AuNPs are used mainly in ultrasensitive detection and imaging-based
therapeutic approaches necessary for treating fatal diseases like cancer because of
their optical qualities. Numerous varieties of AuNPs, including gold nanorods,
nanocages, nanostars, nanocubes, and nanospheres, have been developed for human
cancer and cell biology.
Fig. 12.4 Gold nanoparticles targeting tumor cells

358
N. Gupta et al.
AuNPs’ optical characteristics depend on SPR.The SPR is a mechanism that
involves the resonance of gold electrons in response to an incoming radiation, which
causes them to simultaneously absorb and scatter light. Photoimaging can help
identify tumors in their early stages and direct them towards precise surgical intervention. Having a clear understanding of where the tumor ends and the healthy tissue begins is one of the main issues facing surgeons today. Throughout a surgical
procedure, the surgeons must decide how much of the tumor must be removed; if
they are too conservative, they risk leaving some tumor cells behind, and if they are
too liberal, they risk removing healthy tissues that may be crucial. The majority of
tumors come back over time because most treatments are highly conservative.
The tumors are only recognized when they reach a particular threshold since
MRI and Computed Tomography (CT) scans have limitations and can only detect
tumors above a size of several millimeters or roughly ten million cells. Gold
nanoparticles are targetedly injected into the tumor, where they precisely bond to
the cancer cells and scatter (shine), making it simpler for the surgeons to distinguish
between the tumor and healthy cells. This revolutionary method of cancer treatment
is called photoimaging. Due to their bioinertness and capacity to boost spatial and
temporal resolution for imaging, gold nanoparticles (nanorods, nanocages, and
nanoshells) are regarded as the best photo-imaging nanoparticles for cancer therapies currently on the market (Singh etal. 2018).
12.2.5 PEGylated PLGA Nanocarriers inDiagnostic Applications
Poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) has been extensively used among the
range of organic or inorganic nanomaterials available for the development of drug
delivery systems for cancer therapy and detection because of its biocompatibility
and biodegradability.
Since lactic acid and glycolic acid, which are organic, non-toxic substances that
can eventually be broken down into water and carbon dioxide, may be produced
when PLGA and PLA are broken down, they have been utilized more frequently
than other materials in the production of nanocarriers. PLGA additionally gained
FDA approval for usage in medical applications.
The different targeting moieties can be added to the surface of PLGA-based drug
delivery systems to enable them to target tumors. Additionally, PEGylation of the
outer surface of the PLGA-based drug delivery systems may increase their blood
circulation time. The imaging properties for tumor diagnostics can also be acquired
by integrating the imaging agents into PLGA-based drug delivery systems. Potential
candidates for cancer therapies and diagnostics, called “cancer theranostics” can be
developed by co-loading therapeutic drugs and imaging agents into PLGA-based
drug delivery systems.
By applying external stimuli such as photo, ultrasound, magnetic eld, and
radiofrequency to the targeted areas, remotely triggered cancer therapy can enable
the selective and accurate removal of tumors and controlled release of chemotherapeutics. Additionally, remotely triggered cancer therapy can control when and how

12 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDiagnostic Applications
359
long the treatment lasts, allowing precise treatment and reducing systemic toxicity.
In addition to hydrophilic therapeutic drugs and imaging agents, therapeutic hydrophobic medicines and imaging agents can also be encapsulated into PLGA NPs by
using the water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) double emulsion method. This may
enhance the targeting and bioavailability of hydrophobic drugs and imaging agents
and ultimately lead to the accomplishment of cancer theranostics. A promising anticancer strategy that can selectively and accurately eliminate solid tumors and
remotely control the drug release is using outside factors to initiate cancer therapy
(Shen etal. 2020).
PLGA NPs delivered intravenously are rapidly eliminated by the RES and are
easily opsonized. A new class of amphiphilic block co-polymer nanoplatform,
PEG-PLGA NPs, has been developed through conjugating PEG with PLGA to
enhance the characteristics of PLGA nanoparticles and achieve long-term therapeutic benets. PLGA-based contrast agent composite nanomaterials’ biocompatibility
is substantially improved by PEGylation. Through the EPR effect, PEG-PLGA NPs
modied with ligands can target specic receptors on the tumor surface, facilitating
tumor targeting. However, more study is needed to determine the biocompatibility,
toxicity, and safety of these nanocarriers to ensure their clinical applicability.
Studies must continue searching for ways to customize NPs to recognize tumors as
new cancer-specic target molecules are constantly being found. This strategy could
potentially open new avenues for effective cancer treatment and diagnostic imaging
(Zhang etal. 2022).
12.3 Role ofPEGylated Nanocarriers inDiagnosis ofDiseases
Coating the surface of NPs with PEG, or “PEGylation,” is a commonly used
approach for improving the diagnostic and imaging application employed for various critical diseases.
12.3.1 PEGylated Nanocarriers inCancer Tissue Diagnosis
In the United States, cancer is the second greatest cause of morbidity and mortality,
and it is predicted that rates will rise for at least few years to come. Successfully
delivering innovative therapeutic medicines to the target site while preventing
adverse side effects from systemic treatment is a signicant challenge. The EPR
effect has become widely recognized due to the particular physiology of tumors,
which includes fenestrated vasculature and inadequate lymphatic drainage. By this
process, the tumor–neovasculature’s wide gaps between adjacent endothelial cells
enable passive targeting of the tumor site. At the same time, inadequate lymphatic
outow increases the retention of macromolecular therapies within the tumor mass.
The ability of the therapies to reach their designated cellular and intracellular
target locations while minimizing accumulation and action at nonspecic areas is
crucial for the success of anticancer therapies. PEG surface modication of

360
N. Gupta et al.
nanoparticulate carriers has emerged as a strategy to improve hydrophobic drug
solubility, extend circulation time, reduce nonspecic uptake, and enable specic
tumor- targeting through the EPR effect.
Additionally, PEG modication has become a platform for incorporating active
targeting ligands, offering the drug and gene carriers unique tumor-targeting abilities through a exible tether. Longer circulation improves the possibility that the
nanocarriers will reach the tumor interstitium, where it may be possible to accumulate a more considerable portion of the given dose than the tumor would experience
when medications are administered parenterally without a carrier (Van Vlerken
etal. 2007). Due to PEG’s ability to allow for prolonged bloodstream circulation of
the NPs followed by passive accumulation in the tumor tissue, it has been widely
researched for the production of tumor-targetable NPs The PEG surface, in particular, makes it possible for NPs to bypass the RES and minimizing their clearance
from the liver site. Future brain tumor treatment is likely to be signicantly impacted
by nanotechnology. Especially, NPs could revolutionize brain research, tumor imaging, surgery, and adjuvant therapies. MRI is one of the most advanced nanotechnology applications for diagnosing brain tumors.
As MRI contrast agents, several NPs have been developed. Iron oxide (IO) crystals have produced NP-based contrast agents with an organic shell-like PEG.The
primary advantage of NPs-based materials is that they can give more accurate information regarding the size of a tumor. Both gadolinium-based contrast agents and
NPs-based contrast agents increase tumors by traveling through regions with damaged blood-brain barrier (BBB), where they change the magnitude of the MRI signal. IO-based NPs can be used to nd improved MRI.Additionally, IO-based NPs
have a propensity to persist longer inside the tumor and more precisely delineate
tumor margins than freely diffusing gadolinium chelates. NPs also have the ability
to target molecular tumors very specically. Developing NPs with specic cellular
imaging capabilities, such as stem cells or endothelial cells, is feasible. As tumorspecic contrast agents, several IO NPs now under research appear promising. NPsbased MRI contrast agents have the potential to make tumor areas visible that would
not have been seen with conventional MRI, particularly at the tumor–brain interface. Furthermore, NPs may eventually enhance the accuracy of brain tumor resection (Orringer etal. 2009).
12.3.2 PEGylated Nanocarriers inDiagnosis ofGlioma–
Brain Tumor
The most prevalent and deadly malignant brain tumor is glioma. Due to a lack of
effective treatment, glioblastoma (GBM) patients often only survive for
12–15months after diagnosis. The most successful treatment for glioma patients is
surgical resection, and maximizing safe resection is essential in improving the
prognosis of patients with low or high-grade gliomas. However, the inltrative
nature of the tumors makes it challenging to strike a balance between maximum
cytoreduction and preservation of normal brain tissue. It is believed that small

12 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDiagnostic Applications
361
glioma cells that inltrate the region around the primary tumor are the cause of
over 90% of recurrent tumors, which manifest within a margin of 2–3cm from the
primary site. It has been established that one of the most signicant predictors of
overall survival and progression-free survival and neurological prognosis is the
degree of resection.
Thus, maximum safe resection becomes tremendously essential. Therefore, a
technique that can delineate the boundary of tumors to realize maximum safe resection and protect the normal brain tissues is urgently needed. It has been proved that
intraoperative uorescein is used to guide the surgical resection and can improve the
overall survival and progression-free survival of patients. Although research suggests that uorescence, such as sodium uorescein, 5-aminolevulinate acid, and
others, can be used to guide the removal of gliomas, their clinical utility is constrained by problems such as low quantum uorescence yield and poor
photostability.
To deliver chemotherapy medications to the brain, various NP compositions have
been studied. Most of these formulations made use of polymers that complied with
the strict standards necessary to be approved for use in biological applications.
Nanoparticle technology has improved with the optimization of drug loading,
encapsulation effectiveness, and release prole during the past few years. Brain
cancer imaging has been made easier by using NPs with ligands attached to their
surfaces. To shield NPs from RES and blood protein interactions, PEGylation of
NPs has been frequently used in medication delivery.
PEGylated QDs are uorescent nanocarriers with many notable benets in the
eld of bio-imaging for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. Compared to the standard uorescent materials, maximum safe resection becomes extremely important
since it is essential for improving the prognosis of patients with low- or high-grade
gliomas by surgical resection. However, both grade gliomas tend to penetrate deeply
into the parenchyma around them, so resecting them is challenging. Therefore, it is
crucial to develop a method that makes it possible to see the tumor’s border to carry
out the safest possible resection and safeguard the healthy brain tissues. First, we
have to search for a biomarker that is only expressed in tumors and not in
healthy organs.
In contrast to normal tissues, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) had
only been found in gliomas, lung cancer, breast cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of
the head and neck, and colorectal cancer. EGFRvIII is a tumor-specic antigen or
one that is exclusively expressed in tumors and not in normal tissues. EGFRvIII is,
therefore, the perfect target for the treatment of gliomas. Second, the antibody
EGFRvIII, like many drugs, is too large to pass across the BBB.Thus, a small
chemical that can cross the BBB and specically bind to EGFRvIII is required.
PEGylated QDs can be used to mark the EGFRvIII (Tang etal. 2017).
Another study suggests that the oncogene BMI-1, a central protein in the polycomb group, could be an entirely novel therapeutic target for GBM.PTC209, a
BMI-1 inhibitor, has been incorporated into a PLGA-PEG NP coupled with CD133
antibody (Nano-PTC209) to increase effectiveness and decrease toxicity. NPs signicantly increased apoptosis and signicantly reduced cell viability in a

362
N. Gupta et al.
dose- dependent manner. Additionally, they markedly reduced cells’ capacity for
migration and increased the production of reactive oxygen species (Poonaki
etal. 2021).
12.3.3 PEGylated Nanocarriers inDiagnosis ofGastrointestinal
Tract Imaging
Molecular imaging techniques have a profound impact on the diagnosis and prognosis of disorders, including those affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Colorectal
cancer is the second biggest leading cause of death, closely followed by stomach
cancer for mortality. The keys to effective treatments for gastrointestinal cancer are
early detection and fast intervention. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is an invasive procedure; gas-barium double-contrast imaging is resistant to gastrointestinal cancer in
its early stages, which increases the likelihood of mistaken diagnoses. The noninvasive methods used to diagnose a variety of disorders with the advancement of
medical examination technology include MRI, CT, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), ultrasonography (US), positron emission tomography
(PET), as well as optical imaging techniques.
Designing and synthesizing contrast agents with strong imaging properties that
are appropriate for gastrointestinal imaging is therefore crucial. Additionally, it is
more realistic to diagnose and predict GI disease by doping other materials to do
various imaging modes. PEGylated NPs performed better on CT scans and absorbed
more X-ray than iodinated contrast material at the same concentrations. The NPs
might also be applied to MRI in the presence of Gd. PEGylated nanomaterials had
shown excellent biocompatibility and low systemic toxicity in both invitro and
invivo toxicity tests. PEGylated NPs are excellent techniques as CT/MRI dualmodal contrast agents for in vivo imaging of the GI tract. These NPs showed
improvement in CT imaging compared to the commercially available iodine contrast agents (Cui etal. 2020).
The two varieties of MRI contrast agents now in use are T1 and T2 contrast agents.
Gadolinium and Mn are primarily used in T1 contrast agents. Fe3O4 NPs with a
superparamagnetic eld are T2 agents. Targetable contrast agents are a crucial component of molecular imaging, which could signicantly improve the precision and
accuracy of monitoring. Various Mn3O4-based contrast agents have been reported
for tumor imaging, including MRI with a mix of uorescence. A Mn-based contrast
agent surface coated with PEG exhibits good results for MRI of stomach cancer
monitoring. The MRI effects were instantly markedly amplied by these PEGylated
NPs, which could effectively concentrate in stomach cancer tissues and cells.
Additionally they have the potential to serve as a novel MRI contrast agent for the
postoperative monitoring of gastric cancer (Li etal. 2020).
An efcient oral MRI contrast agent for gastrointestinal tract imaging is NPs of
gadolinium-incorporated Prussian blue with PEG coating. It exhibits high r1 relaxivity (i.e., high sensitivity) and excellent temporal stability, with contrast enhancement characteristics remaining nearly unchanged when passing throughout the GI

12 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDiagnostic Applications
363
tract. Other commonly employed oral contrast agents lack the ability to pass through
cell membranes to serve as cellular MRI probes, have modest relaxivity values, and
exhibit poor temporal stability when administered to the GI tract. Based on its applicability as MRI contrast agent, it is tempting to hypothesize that gadoliniumincorporated Prussian blue presents the potential for developing a sensitive cellular
MRI probe for early cancer detection in the GI tract. These PEGylated NPs have
very high r1 relaxivity and can rapidly penetrate the cell (Perera etal. 2016).
12.4 Conclusion andFuture Resolutions
PEGylated components are typically used to prevent opsonization and protein binding in serum for therapeutic proteins and NPs to show extended circulation periods.
It has been shown to be a practical scaffold for incorporating active targeting ligands
and inuencing intracellular target localization. PEG has signicantly developed
drug delivery systems, particularly for detecting, diagnosing, and treating tumors.
PEG’s adaptability will make it possible to investigate new applications and make
ongoing advancements to anticancer therapies and diagnosis. Preclinical and clinical trials for more PEGylated proteins and short peptides are anticipated to begin
soon. There are also numerous PEGylated nanoparticle medicinal and diagnostic
compounds in active development. Accelerating the clinical translation of innovative PEGylated agents, including carbon nanotubes, nanodiamonds, microbubbles,
dendrimers, and other nanoparticles, will require using existing technology and creating new techniques in the diagnostic application.
A number of key requirements, such as non-toxicity, non-immunogenicity, target
selectivity, and biodegradability, need to be fullled by nanomedicines in order for
them to be commercially successful for the diagnostic application. The production
of multifunctional PEG molecules that can be grafted with anti-biofouling compounds, uorescent agents, and other functional polymers is critical in developing
PEGylated NPs. PEGylated nanocarriers have a promising future in biomedical
research and diagnostics, particularly in the elds of disease diagnosis, early detection, cellular and deep tissue imaging, drug/gene delivery, and multifunctional therapies. These efforts would essentially simplify, accelerate, and minimize the
invasiveness of the diagnosing processes. PEGylated nanocarriers would be an
appealing material for diagnostic and imaging applications in the following years
and could alter the normal business practices of pharmaceutical companies. .
References
Alconcel SN, Baas AS, Maynard HDJPC (2011) Fda-approved poly (ethylene glycol)–protein
conjugate. Drugs 2:1442–1448
Alromi DA, Madani SY, Seifalian A (2021) Emerging application of magnetic nanoparticles for
diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Polymers 13:4146
Baetke SC, Lammers T, Kiessling F (2015) Applications of nanoparticles for diagnosis and therapy
of cancer. Br J Radiol 88:20150207

364
Banerjee SS, Aher N, Patil R, Khandare J (2012) Poly(ethylene glycol)-prodrug conjugates: con-
cept, design, and applications. J Drug Deliv 2012:103973
Bence AK, Adams VR, Piascik PJJOTAPA (2002) Peglgrastim: A new therapy to prevent neutro-
penic fever. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 42:806–808
Bian X, Guo T, Zhang J, Xia J, Feng X, Wang F, Lin M, Tian W (2021) The magnetic nanomaterial
biofunctions in cancer diagnosis and therapy. J Nanomater 2021:9968166
Booth C, Gaspar HB (2009) Pegademase bovine (peg-Ada) for the treatment of infants and chil-
dren with severe combined immunodeciency (Scid). Biologics 3:349–358
Cho EC, Glaus C, Chen J, Welch MJ, Xia Y (2010) Inorganic nanoparticle-based contrast agents
for molecular imaging. Trends Mol Med 16:561–573
Choi KY, Jeon EJ, Yoon HY, Lee BS, Na JH, Min KH, Kim SY, Myung SJ, Lee S, Chen X, Kwon
IC, Choi K, Jeong SY, Kim K, Park JH (2012) Theranostic nanoparticles based on Pegylated
hyaluronic acid for the diagnosis, therapy and monitoring of colon cancer. Biomaterials
33:6186–6193
Cui F-Z, Liu J-H, Liu Y, Yuan B-Y, Gong X, Yuan Q-H, Gong T-T, Wang L (2020) Synthesis of
pegylated Bagdf5 nanoparticles as efcient Ct/Mri dual-modal contrast agents for gastrointes-
tinal tract imaging. Chin J Anal Chem 48:1004–1011
Dinndorf PA, Gootenberg J, Cohen MH, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2007) Fda drug approval summary:
Pegaspargase (Oncaspar) for the rst-line treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leu-
kemia (all). Oncologist 12:991–998
Dirheimer L, Pons T, Marchal F, Bezdetnaya L (2022) Quantum dots mediated imaging and pho-
totherapy in cancer spheroid models: State of the art and perspectives. Pharmaceutics 14:2136
Herndon TM, Demko SG, Jiang X, He K, Gootenberg JE, Cohen MH, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2012)
U.S. food and drug administration approval: Peginterferon-alfa-2b for the adjuvant treatment
of patients with melanoma. Oncologist 17:1323–1328
Huang YC, Yang YC, Yang KC, Shieh HR, Wang TY, Hwu Y, Chen YJ (2014) Pegylated gold
nanoparticles induce apoptosis in human chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Biomed Res Int
2014:182353
Illés E, Szekeres M, Tóth IY, Farkas K, Földesi I, Szabó Á, Iván B, Tombácz E (2018) Pegylation
of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with self-organizing Polyacrylate-peg brushes
for contrast enhancement in Mri diagnosis. Nanomaterials (Basel) 8:776
Kang B, Lim J, Son H-Y, Choi Y, Kang T, Jung J, Huh Y-M, Haam S, Lim E-K (2019) Pegylated
magnetic Nano-assemblies as contrast agents for effective T2-weighted MR imaging.
Nanomaterials (Basel) 9:410
Karakoti AS, Das S, Thevuthasan S, Seal S (2011) Pegylated Inorganic nanoparticles. Angew
Chem Int Ed Engl 50:1980–1994
Kong FY, Zhang JW, Li RF, Wang ZX, Wang WJ, Wang W (2017) Unique roles of gold nanopar-
ticles in drug delivery, targeting and imaging applications. Molecules 22:1445
Lang L (2008) Fda approves Cimzia to treat Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 134:1819
Lazaro-Carrillo A, Filice M, Guillén MJ, Amaro R, Viñambres M, Tabero A, Paredes KO,
Villanueva A, Calvo P, Del Puerto Morales M, Marciello M (2020) Tailor-made peg coated iron
oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents for long lasting magnetic resonance molecular imaging
of solid cancers. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 107:110262
Li SD, Huang L (2010) Stealth nanoparticles: high density but Sheddable peg is a key for tumor
targeting. J Control Release 145:178–181
Li K, Li P, Wang Y, Han S (2020) Manganese-based targeted nanoparticles for postoperative gas-
tric cancer monitoring via magnetic resonance imaging. Front Oncol 10:601538
Liang Z, Khawar MB, Liang J, Sun H (2021) Bio-conjugated quantum dots for cancer research:
detection and imaging. Front Oncol 11:749970
Lu F, Ju W, Zhao N, Zhao T, Zhan C, Wang Q, Fan Q, Huang W (2020) Aqueous synthesis of
Pegylated ag(2)S quantum dots and their invivo tumor targeting behavior. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun 529:930–935
N. Gupta et al.

12 PEGylated Nanocarriers forDiagnostic Applications
Nițică Ș, Moldovan AI, Toma V, Moldovan CS, Berindan-Neagoe I, Știuuc G, Lucaciu CM,
Știuuc R (2018) Pegylated gold nanoparticles with interesting Plasmonic properties synthe-
sized using an original, rapid, and easy-to-implement procedure. J Nanomater 2018:5954028
Orringer DA, Koo YE, Chen T, Kopelman R, Sagher O, Philbert MA (2009) Small solutions for
big problems: the application of nanoparticles to brain tumor diagnosis and therapy. Clin
Pharmacol Ther 85:531–534
Perera VS, Chen G, Cai Q, Huang SD (2016) Nanoparticles of gadolinium-incorporated Prussian
blue with peg coating as an effective Oral Mri contrast agent for gastrointestinal tract imaging.
Analyst 141:2016–2022
Poonaki E, Ariakia F, Jalili-Nik M, Shaee Ardestani M, Tondro G, Samini F, Ghasemi S,
Sahab-Negah S, Gorji A (2021) Targeting Bmi-1 With Plga–Peg nanoparticle-Containing
Ptc209 Modulates the behavior of human glioblastoma stem cells and cancer Cells. Cancer
Nanotechnol 12:5
Rubio T (2015) Summaries of safety labeling changes approved by Fda—boxed warnings high-
lights October–December 2014, vol 72. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p343
Shan X, Yuan Y, Liu C, Tao X, Sheng Y, Xu F (2009) Inuence of peg chain on the complement
activation suppression and longevity invivo prolongation of the Pcl biomedical nanoparticles.
Biomed Microdevices 11:1187–1194
Shen X, Li T, Xie X, Feng Y, Chen Z, Yang H, Wu C, Deng S, Liu Y (2020) PLGA-based drug
delivery systems for remotely triggered cancer therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Front
Bioeng Biotechnol 8:381
Shi L, Zhang J, Zhao M, Tang S, Cheng X, Zhang W, Li W, Liu X, Peng H-S, Wang Q (2021)
Effects of polyethylene glycol on the surface of nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery.
Nanoscale 13:10748
Singh P, Pandit S, Mokkapati V, Garg A, Ravikumar V, Mijakovic I (2018) Gold nanoparticles in
diagnostics and therapeutics for human cancer. Int J Mol Sci 19:1979
Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign LM (2016) Pegylation as a strategy for improving
nanoparticle- based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 99:28–51
Tang J, Huang N, Zhang X, Zhou T, Tan Y, Pi J, Pi L, Cheng S, Zheng H, Cheng Y (2017) Aptamer-
conjugated Pegylated quantum dots targeting epidermal growth factor receptor variant iii for
uorescence imaging of glioma. Int J Nanomedicine 12:3899–3911
Vallabani NVS, Singh S (2018) Recent advances and future prospects of iron oxide nanoparticles
in biomedicine and diagnostics. 3 Biotech 8:279
Van Vlerken LE, Vyas TK, Amiji MM (2007) Poly(ethylene glycol)-modied Nanocarriers for
tumor-targeted and intracellular delivery. Pharm Res 24:1405–1414
Verhoef JJ, Anchordoquy TJ (2013) Questioning the use of Pegylation for drug delivery. Drug
Deliv Transl Res 3:499–503
Veronese F, Pasut G (2005) Veronese, F.M. & Pasut, G.Pegylation, successful approach to drug
delivery. Drug Discov Today 10:1451–1458
Working PK, Newman MS, Huang SK, Mayhew E, Vaage J, Lasic DD (1994) Pharmacokinetics,
biodistribution and therapeutic efcacy of doxorubicin encapsulated in stealth® liposomes
(Doxil®). J Liposome Res 4:667–687
Yue-Jian C, Juan T, Fei X, Jia-Bi Z, Ning G, Yi-Hua Z, Ye D, Liang G (2010) Synthesis, self-
assembly, and characterization of peg-coated iron oxide nanoparticles as potential Mri contrast
agent. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 36:1235–1244
Zhang M, Du Y, Wang S, Chen B (2020) A review of biomimetic nanoparticle drug delivery sys-
tems based on cell membranes. Drug Des Devel Ther 14:5495–5503
Zhang D, Liu L, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Xing G, Wang X, Liu M (2022) Drug-Loaded Peg-
Plga nanoparticles for cancer treatment. Front Pharmacol 13:990505
365

Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
