Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5373_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
14 Reversible PEGylation ofNanocarriers
417

14.5.5 Immunogenicity

Despite PEG’s well-known low immunogenicity, some researchers have reported experiencing immunological reactions. Reversible PEGylation may cause an immu­nological reaction when exposed to PEG repeatedly, which could eventually decrease the medicinal agent’s effectiveness (Shiraishi and Yokoyama 2019; Veronese 2001).

14.5.6 Scale-up Difficulties

The shift from laboratory-scale synthesis to large-scale production may pose dif­culties with cost-effectiveness, scalability, and reproducibility. For larger-scale applications, the synthesis and purication techniques developed on a small scale might need to be optimized.
14.5.7 Influence onDrug Bioavailability
PEG concentrations can affect a drug’s bioavailability. The advantages of extended circulation times must be carefully weighed against possible changes in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) patterns in reversible PEGylation systems.

14.5.8 Cost

A major determinant of their uptake may be the expense of synthesizing and pro­ducing reversible PEGylation conjugates. One crucial factor to take into account is the expense of synthesis, purication, and regulatory compliance in relation to the possible advantages of better therapeutic outcomes (Tao etal. 2009).
Addressing these challenges requires interdisciplinary efforts, combining exper­tise in chemistry, biology, and materials science. Despite these obstacles, reversible PEGylation holds promise for enhancing the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic out­comes of various bioactive molecules (Pomroy and Deber 1998). Ongoing research aims to overcome these challenges and unlock the full potential of reversible PEGylation in medical and biotechnological applications.

14.6 Conclusion

To sum up, reversible PEGylation of nanocarriers offers a viable path towards drug delivery system optimization. Reversible PEGylation provides a careful balance among biocompatibility and effective payload delivery by addressing the drawbacks of irreversible PEGylation, including reduced cellular absorption and clinical
418
M. Mishra et al.
efcacy. Stimuli-responsive polymers along with cleavable linkers provide con­trolled dissociation of PEG chains from nanocarrier, activated by specic physio­logical circumstances, thereby improving targeted release at a particular site of action. Reversible PEGylation techniques, such as pH-sensitive, temperature-trig­gered formulations, and enzyme-responsive, are highly versatile and can be used to achieve more precise drug release kinetics and better therapeutic results. Expanding up reversible PEGylation methods, maintaining stability in storage and transit, and negotiating regulatory processes for clinical approval are still difcult tasks. In order to fully realize the ability of reversible PEGylation to revolutionize drug deliv­ery and ultimately result in less hazardous more efcient treatments for a variety of disorders, it will be imperative to address these obstacles.

References

Abdelmohsen HA, Copeland NA, Hardy JG (2023) Light-responsive biomaterials for ocular drug
delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res 13:2159–2182 Alavi SE, Bakht U, Koohi Moftakhari Esfahani M, Adelnia H, Abdollahi SH, Ebrahimi Shahmabadi
H, Raza A (2022) A PEGylated nanostructured lipid carrier for enhanced oral delivery of anti-
biotics. Pharmaceutics 14:1668 Alsawaftah NM, Awad NS, Pitt WG, Husseini GA (2022) pH-responsive nanocarriers in cancer
therapy. Polymers 14:936 Alshawwa SZ, Kassem AA, Farid RM, Mostafa SK, Labib GS (2022) Nanocarrier drug deliv-
ery systems: characterization, limitations, future perspectives and implementation of articial
intelligence. Pharmaceutics 14:883 Amin M, Lammers T, Ten Hagen TL (2022) Temperature-sensitive polymers to promote heat-
triggered drug release from liposomes: towards bypassing EPR.Adv Drug Deliv Rev 114503 Arkosi M-K, Mot AC, Lupan I, Tegla MGG, Silaghi-Dumitrescu R (2023) Selective attachment of
polyethylene glycol to hemerythrin for potential use in blood substitutes. Protein J:1–9 Bista RK, Bruch RF (2008) Near-infrared spectroscopy of newly developed PEGylated lipids.
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 71:410–416 Böttger R, Knappe D, Hoffmann R (2016) Readily adaptable release kinetics of prodrugs using
protease-dependent reversible PEGylation. J Control Release 230:88–94 Cheng T-L, Chuang K-H, Chen B-M, Rofer SR (2012) Analytical measurement of PEGylated
molecules. Bioconjug Chem 23:881–899 Famili A, Kahook MY, Park D (2014) A combined micelle and poly (serinol hexamethylene urea)-
co-poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) reverse thermal gel as an injectable ocular drug delivery sys-
tem. Macromol Biosci 14:1719–1729 Fella C, Walker GF, Ogris M, Wagner E (2008) Amine-reactive pyridylhydrazone-based PEG
reagents for pH-reversible PEI polyplex shielding. Eur J Pharm Sci 34:309–320 Filpula D, Zhao H (2008) Releasable PEGylation of proteins with customized linkers. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev 60:29–49 Gaberc-Porekar V, Zore I, Podobnik B, Menart V (2008) Obstacles and pitfalls in the PEGylation
of therapeutic proteins. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 11:242 Ganji F, Abdekhodaie M (2008) Synthesis and characterization of a new thermosensitive chitosan–
PEG diblock copolymer. Carbohydr Polym 74:435–441 Ghosal S, Walker JE, Alabi CA (2021) Predictive platforms of bond cleavage and drug release
kinetics for macromolecule–drug conjugates. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 12:241–261 Ghosh R, Dey J (2020) PH-responsive vesicle formation by PEGylated cholesterol derivatives:
physicochemical characterization, stability, encapsulation, and release study. Langmuir
36:5829–5838
14 Reversible PEGylation ofNanocarriers
Gupta V, Bhavanasi S, Quadir M, Singh K, Ghosh G, Vasamreddy K, Ghosh A, Siahaan TJ,
Banerjee S, Banerjee SK (2019) Protein PEGylation for cancer therapy: bench to bedside. J
Cell Commun Signal 13:319–330 Hamidi M, Azadi A, Raei P (2006) Pharmacokinetic consequences of PEGylation. Drug Deliv
13:399–409 Harris JM, Chess RB (2003) Effect of PEGylation on pharmaceuticals. Nat Rev Drug Discov
2:214–221 Higashi T, Kogo T, Sato N, Hirotsu T, Misumi S, Nakamura H, Iohara D, Onodera R, Motoyama
K, Arima H (2020) Efcient anticancer drug delivery for pancreatic cancer treatment utilizing
supramolecular polyethylene-glycosylated bromelain. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3:3005–3014 Howard MD, Jay M, Dziubla TD, Lu X (2008) PEGylation of nanocarrier drug delivery systems:
state of the art. J Biomed Nanotechnol 4:133–148 Hu F, Zhang R, Guo W, Yan T, He X, Hu F, Ren F, Ma X, Lei J, Zheng W (2020) PEGylated-PLGA
nanoparticles coated with pH-responsive tannic acid–Fe (III) complexes for reduced premature
doxorubicin release and enhanced targeting in breast cancer. Mol Pharm 18:2161–2173 Jain A, Jain SK (2008) PEGylation: an approach for drug delivery. A review. Crit Rev Ther Drug
Carrier Syst 25:403 Karimi M, Eslami M, Sahandi-Zangabad P, Mirab F, Farajisaloo N, Shafaei Z, Ghosh D,
Bozorgomid M, Dashkhaneh F, Hamblin MR (2016) pH-sensitive stimulus-responsive
nanocarriers for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed
Nanobiotechnol 8:696–716 Kodera Y, Matsushima A, Hiroto M, Nishimura H, Ishii A, Ueno T, Inada Y (1998) PEGylation
of proteins and bioactive substances for medical and technical applications. Prog Polym Sci
23:1233–1271 Lehner R, Hunziker P (2012) Why not just switch on the light?: light and its versatile applications
in the eld of nanomedicine. Eur J Nanomed 4:73–80 Li D, Tang G, Yao H, Zhu Y, Shi C, Fu Q, Yang F, Wang X (2022) Formulation of pH-responsive
PEGylated nanoparticles with high drug loading capacity and programmable drug release for
enhanced antibacterial activity. Bioact Mater 16:47–56 Liu Y, Liu L, Yu N, Dai L, Stella C, Chang V, Kaur S, Xu K, Wakshull E (2020) Immunoafnity
LC–MS/MS is more suitable than ELISA to quantify a PEGylated molecule in cynomolgus
monkey serum. Bioanalysis 12:1061–1069 Lv S, Song K, Yen A, Peeler DJ, Nguyen DC, Olshefsky A, Sylvestre M, Srinivasan S, Stayton
PS, Pun SH (2022) Well-dened mannosylated polymer for peptide vaccine delivery with
enhanced antitumor immunity. Adv Healthc Mater 11:2101651 Ma T, Walko M, Lepoitevin M, Janot JM, Balanzat E, Kocer A, Balme S (2018) Combining light-
gated and pH-responsive nanopore based on PEG-Spiropyran functionalization. Adv Mater
Interfaces 5:1701051 Massoumi B, Abbasian M, Jahanban-Esfahlan R, Motamedi S, Samadian H, Rezaei A,
Derakhshankhah H, Farnudiyan-Habibi A, Jaymand M (2020) PEGylated hollow pH-
responsive polymeric nanocapsules for controlled drug delivery. Polym Int 69:519–527 Mccombs JR, Owen SC (2015) Antibody drug conjugates: design and selection of linker, payload
and conjugation chemistry. AAPS J 17:339–351 Milla P, Dosio F, Cattel L (2012) PEGylation of proteins and liposomes: a powerful and exible
strategy to improve the drug delivery. Curr Drug Metab 13:105–119 Mishra P, Nayak B, Dey R (2016) PEGylation in anti-cancer therapy: an overview. Asian J Pharm
Sci 11:337–348 Moosmann A, Gerlach E, Lindner R, Böttinger H (2012) Purication of a PEGylated single chain
Fv. J Chromatogr A 1236:90–96 Motlaq VF, Knudsen KD, Nyström B (2018) Effect of PEGylation on the stability of thermore-
sponsive nanogels. J Colloid Interface Sci 524:245–255 Nesher M, Vachutinsky Y, Fridkin G, Schwarz Y, Sasson K, Fridkin M, Shechter Y, Lichtstein
D (2008) Reversible PEGylation prolongs the hypotensive effect of atrial natriuretic peptide.
Bioconjug Chem 19:342–348
419
420
Nie Y, Günther M, Gu Z, Wagner E (2011) Pyridylhydrazone-based PEGylation for pH-reversible
lipopolyplex shielding. Biomaterials 32:858–869 Ozer I, Pitoc GA, Layzer JM, Moreno A, Olson LB, Layzer KD, Hucknall AM, Sullenger BA,
Chilkoti A (2022) PEG-like brush polymer conjugate of RNA aptamer that shows reversible
anticoagulant activity and minimal immune response. Adv Mater 34:2107852 Paolino D, Accolla ML, Cilurzo F, Cristiano MC, Cosco D, Castelli F, Sarpietro MG, Fresta M,
Celia C (2017) Interaction between PEG lipid and DSPE/DSPC phospholipids: an insight of
PEGylation degree and kinetics of de-PEGylation. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 155:266–275 Peleg-Shulman T, Tsubery H, Mironchik M, Fridkin M, Schreiber G, Shechter Y (2004) Reversible
PEGylation: a novel technology to release native interferon α2 over a prolonged time period. J
Med Chem 47:4897–4904 Pelosi C, Saitta F, Wurm FR, Fessas D, Tinè MR, Duce C (2019) Thermodynamic stability of
myoglobin-poly (ethylene glycol) bioconjugates: a calorimetric study. Thermochim Acta
671:26–31 Pomroy NC, Deber CM (1998) Solubilization of hydrophobic peptides by reversible cysteine
PEGylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 245:618–621 Rieger J, Grazon C, Charleux B, Alaimo D, Jérôme C (2009) Pegylated thermally responsive
block copolymer micelles and nanogels via in situ RAFT aqueous dispersion polymerization. J
Polym Sci A Polym Chem 47:2373–2390 Rustad EA, Von Hofsten S, Kumar R, Lænsman EA, Berge G, Škalko-Basnet N (2022) The pH-
responsive liposomes—the effect of PEGylation on release kinetics and cellular uptake in glio-
blastoma cells. Pharmaceutics 14:1125 Sadekar S, Ghandehari H (2012) Transepithelial transport and toxicity of PAMAM dendrimers:
implications for oral drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:571–588 Shechter Y, Tsubery H, Mironchik M, Rubinstein M, Fridkin M (2005) Reversible PEGylation
of peptide YY3-36 prolongs its inhibition of food intake in mice. FEBS Lett 579:2439–2444 Shechter Y, Mironchik M, Rubinraut S, Tsubery H, Sasson K, Marcus Y, Fridkin M (2008)
Reversible PEGylation of insulin facilitates its prolonged action invivo. Eur J Pharm Biopharm
70:19–28 Shechter Y, Heldman E, Sasson K, Bachar T, Popov M, Fridkin M (2010) Delivery of neuropep-
tides from the periphery to the brain: studies with enkephalin. ACS Chem Neurosci 1:399–406 Shete MB, Patil TS, Deshpande AS, Saraogi G, Vasdev N, Deshpande M, Rajpoot K, Tekade RK
(2022) Current trends in theranostic nanomedicines. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 71:103280 Shi D, Beasock D, Fessler A, Szebeni J, Ljubimova JY, Afonin KA, Dobrovolskaia MA (2022)
To PEGylate or not to PEGylate: immunological properties of nanomedicine’s most popular
component, polyethylene glycol and its alternatives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 180:114079 Shiraishi K, Yokoyama M (2019) Toxicity and immunogenicity concerns related to PEGylated-
micelle carrier systems: a review. Sci Technol Adv Mater 20:324–336 Shiraishi Y, Shirakawa E, Tanaka K, Sakamoto H, Ichikawa S, Hirai T (2014) Spiropyran-modied
gold nanoparticles: reversible size control of aggregates by UV and visible light irradiations.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:7554–7562 Son J, Yi G, Yoo J, Park C, Koo H, Choi HS (2019) Light-responsive nanomedicine for biophotonic
imaging and targeted therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 138:133–147 Stigsnaes P, Frokjaer S, Bjerregaard S, Van De Weert M, Kingshott P, Moeller EH (2007)
Characterisation and physical stability of PEGylated glucagon. Int J Pharm 330:89–98 Sun D, Ding J, Xiao C, Chen J, Zhuang X, Chen X (2015a) Drug delivery: pH-responsive revers-
ible PEGylation improves performance of antineoplastic agent (Adv. Healthcare Mater.
6/2015). Adv Healthc Mater 4:786–786 Sun D, Ding J, Xiao C, Chen J, Zhuang X, Chen X (2015b) pH-responsive reversible PEGylation
improves performance of antineoplastic agent. Adv Healthc Mater 4:844–855 Tao L, Liu J, Xu J, Davis TP (2009) Bio-reversible polyPEGylation. Chem Commun:6560–6562 Thakur S, Kesharwani P, Tekade RK, Jain NK (2015) Impact of PEGylation on biopharmaceutical
properties of dendrimers. Polymer 59:67–92
M. Mishra et al.
14 Reversible PEGylation ofNanocarriers
Thomas OS, Rebmann B, Tonn M, Schirmeister IC, Wehrle S, Becker J, Zea Jimenez GJ, Hook S,
Jäger S, Klenzendorf M (2022) Reversible shielding and immobilization of liposomes and viral
vectors by tailored antibody-ligand interactions. Small 18:2105157 Tsubery H, Mironchik M, Fridkin M, Shechter Y (2004) Prolonging the action of protein and
peptide drugs by a novel approach of reversible polyethylene glycol modication. J Biol Chem
279:38118–38124 Utatsu K, Kogo T, Taharabaru T, Onodera R, Motoyama K, Higashi T (2021) Supramolecular
polymer-based transformable material for reversible PEGylation of protein drugs. Mater Today
Bio 12:100160 Veronese FM (2001) Peptide and protein PEGylation: a review of problems and solutions.
Biomaterials 22:405–417 Veronese FM, Pasut G (2005) PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery. Drug Discov
Today 10:1451–1458 Vllasaliu D, Fowler R, Stolnik S (2014) PEGylated nanomedicines: recent progress and remaining
concerns. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 11:139–154 Wagner E (2012) Polymers for siRNA delivery: inspired by viruses to be targeted, dynamic, and
precise. Acc Chem Res 45:1005–1013 Xing Y, Zeng B, Yang W (2022) Light responsive hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Front
Bioeng Biotechnol 10:1075670 Yadav D, Dewangan HK (2021) PEGYLATION: an important approach for novel drug delivery
system. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 32:266–280 Zalipsky S, Mullah N, Engbers C, Hutchins MU, Kiwan R (2007) Thiolytically cleavable dithio-
benzyl urethane-linked polymer–protein conjugates as macromolecular prodrugs: reversible
PEGylation of proteins. Bioconjug Chem 18:1869–1878 Zhang G, Jiang X (2019) Temperature responsive nanoparticles based on PEGylated polyaspar-
tamide derivatives for drug delivery. Polymers 11:316 Zhang X, Fu C, Feng L, Ji Y, Tao L, Huang Q, Li S, Wei Y (2012) PEGylation and polyPEGylation
of nanodiamond. Polymer 53:3178–3184 Zhang F, Liu M-R, Wan H-T (2014) Discussion about several potential drawbacks of PEGylated
therapeutic proteins. Biol Pharm Bull 37:335–339 Zhang X, Feng L, Dong Z, Xin X, Yang Z, Deng D, Wagner E, Liu Z, Liu X (2020) Protein-drug
conjugate programmed by pH-reversible linker for tumor hypoxia relief and enhanced cancer
combination therapy. Int J Pharm 582:119321 Zhu S, Hong M, Tang G, Qian L, Lin J, Jiang Y, Pei Y (2010) Partly PEGylated polyamidoamine
dendrimer for tumor-selective targeting of doxorubicin: the effects of PEGylation degree and
drug conjugation style. Biomaterials 31:1360–1371 Zhu Y, Chen C, Cao Z, Shen S, Li L, Li D, Wang J, Yang X (2019) On-demand PEGylation and
dePEGylation of PLA-based nanocarriers via amphiphilic mPEG-TK-Ce6 for nanoenabled
cancer chemotherapy. Theranostics 9:8312
421

Stimuli-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers

SamahHamedAlmurisi, PrasanthiSriNaginderaRao, andThiagarajanMadheswaran
Abstract
Compared to traditional medication dosage forms, nanocarrier-based delivery
systems confer several benets, including drug protection, improved bioavail-
ability, and tailored administration to disease sites. With increased availability in
the body, better drug loading values, improved intracellular transport, and supe-
rior physiological outcomes, nanocarriers are reported to improve targeted drug
delivery to cells and tissues. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers with unique design
characteristics can adapt to exogenous and endogenous stimuli; their structure
and physicochemical properties change in response to various factors. This
results in the release of drugs at a specic target site when triggered by certain
physiological or external triggers. Numerous therapeutic and diagnostic pro-
cesses can be made substantially more effective by creating pharmaceutical
nanocarriers with multiresponsive systems. The most popular technique for giv-
ing drug nanocarriers stealthy characteristics is PEGylation. The PEG molecules
have been altered to improve their uptake by particular targets and to allow con-
trolled drug release. This chapter highlights the most recent developments in
nanocarriers with multifunctional properties and stimuli sensitivity for therapeu-
tic drug delivery applications. By delivering the drugs specically to the disease
cells, there is a pronounced enhancement in the efcacy of the treatment, improv-
ing the incidence of unwanted effects on nontarget cells, tissues, and organs.
15
S. H. Almurisi · P. S. NaginderaRao · T. Madheswaran (*) Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia e-mail: Thiagarajan@imu.edu.my
423
424
Keywords
S. H. Almurisi et al.
Nanocarriers · Stimuli-responsive · Drug targeting · PEGylated · Theragnostic
applications
Abbreviations
ABC Ammonium bicarbonate AMF Magnetic eld CAFs Cancer-associated broblasts CAT Catalase CPs Conductive polymers CS Chitosan CST Critical solution temperature CUR Curcumin Cys Cysteine DOX Doxorubicin DTT Dithiothreitol ECs Endothelial cells EPR Enhanced permeability and retention Gox Glucose oxidase GPx Glutathione peroxidase GSH Glutathione HA Hyaluronic acid LCST Lower critical solution temperature MBs Microbubbles MC Merocyanine MHT Magnetic hyperthermia MMA Methyl methacrylate MMPs Matrix metalloproteinases MNPs Magnetic nanoparticles MoS2 Molydenum disulde NADPH oxidase Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase NBs Nanobubbles NIR Near-infrared NPs Nanoparticles NR Nile red OG Oil-soluble uorescent green PCL Polycaprolactone PEG Polyethylene glycol PEGylation The process of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based modication
of molecules for biomedical application PEI Polyethyleneimine pNIPAm Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)
15 Stimuli-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
425
PNIPAm Poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide PTX Paclitaxel RES Reticuloendothelial system ROS Reactive oxygen species Se Selenium Se-Se Diselenide SOD Superoxide dismutases SP Spiropyran S-S Disulde US Ultrasound UV Ultraviolet
γ-GCS γ-glutamyl cysteine γ-PGA Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA)

15.1 Introduction

New technologies incorporating advanced nanomaterials that are applicable to ther­anostics have evolved to address the obstacles posed by conventional dosage forms and the adverse effects associated with pharmaceuticals. These new technologies have dual properties, including bioimaging for diagnostic purposes and targeted drug release for therapeutic function (Pham etal. 2020a). Engineers and researchers have been putting more effort into designing and producing stimuli-sensitive nano­materials with combined therapy and diagnostic functions. This is being done to maximize the scope of nanotechnology applications for precise drug delivery and disease diagnosis in the human tissue while maintaining a higher level of safety and biocompatibility (Oladipo etal. 2023). These intelligent nanomaterials, utilized in controlled drug delivery strategies, are formulated to react primarily to external stimuli when required. Another way to implement this requirement is to trigger it when necessary (Ahmad and Packirisamy 2020).
In contrast to conventional nanocarriers, new-generation drug nanocarriers with stimuli-sensitive properties can recognize the environment in which bacteria are located and the site of the infection. Furthermore, these nanocarriers respond dynamically to specic triggers from outside factors (Bag etal. 2023). In addition to this, they can control drug delivery patterns by preventing drug leakage before reaching the target site to improve the delivery of loaded drugs at the target site while simultaneously reducing the likelihood of unwanted side effects. Therefore, nanocarriers created with nanomaterials with stimuli-sensitive properties present distinct, improved therapeutic action and more targeted delivery. Additionally, these nanocarriers have a superior capacity for cell penetration, which is necessary to treat various cancers effectively (Gessner and Neundorf 2020).
In the last 10years, strategies for successfully delivering therapeutic drugs have been developed, including polymer-based nanomaterials sensitive to stimuli. The nanocarriers are designed to allow the release of drugs in the presence of selected stimuli across polymer, lipid, or metal nanoparticles. These stimuli can be internal or external or triggered by dual or multiple factors. The design of the material can
426
S. H. Almurisi et al.
be employed. The term “stimuli-responsive smart biomaterials” refers to materials triggered in response to the local microenvironment’s pH, enzymes, physical force, or redox stimuli to release drugs loaded into the nanocarriers. A myriad of potential applications are associated with these biomaterials (Alves etal. 2021).
Redox potential, pH, enzymes, ions, and oxygen and glucose levels are all exam­ples of endogenous stimuli, also known as internal or biological stimuli. These stimuli are mostly peculiar to sick tissue and have the potential to accumulate at the target site. They also have the potential to disrupt the structure of nanocarriers and change the functions they perform. These stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems observe various expression proles in response to specic cells or tissues. The nanocarriers interact with antibodies and antigens and can detect host-guest prod­ucts in a particular state to release the drug. An example of a highly specic poten­tial trigger includes processes catalyzed by enzymes specic to particular substrates and catalytic properties (Sheshala etal. 2022). Enzymatically catalyzed processes possess high specicity and high catalytic properties, making them suitable as trig­gers for drug release. A critical challenge in drug release is an unspecic time and nontargeted release; to overcome this, careful design and selection of stimuli­sensitive biomaterials is necessary. This requirement must be met to fabricate nano­carriers (Joseph etal. 2023).
In many stimuli-based drug delivery strategies, exogenous or external stimuli are applied as chemical, biological, or physical techniques to allow the nanocarriers to release their therapeutic drug payloads in a regulated and targeted manner, as illus­trated in Fig.15.1. Exogenous triggers such as light, heat, ultrasound, and electrical and magnetic elds can all trigger controlled drug delivery. The benets of applying external stimuli to disrupt the structure of stimuli-sensitive nanocarriers include the
Fig. 15.1 Illustration of exogenous and endogenous stimuli-responsive systems