Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5373_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
467
(c) Reduced protein adsorption on surfaces coated with pCBMA has been shown
in invivo investigations using animal models, leading to extended circulation durations for drug carriers. This shows that the body tolerates pCBMA well (Taylor etal. 2021).
According to studies on its toxicity, when manufactured correctly and delivered in the proper doses, pCBMA does not demonstrate acute toxicity or adverse effects on essential organs. However, like with any substance, negative consequences could result from prolonged exposure or high doses. To avoid contamination, pCBMA should be synthesized and handled in sterile circumstances. Any impurities added during synthesis or handling can jeopardize the product’s safety prole. For each unique drug delivery application, the pCBMA dosage and concentration should be calculated. Appropriate dosage is essential to get the desired PEG-like effects while lowering the risk of overexposure. It’s important to do thorough safety assessments and research for each situation because the safety prole can vary depending on the specic poly(zwitterion) and its application (Marcelino 2016).
Since poly(zwitterions) exhibit much stronger intramolecular interactions via ionic binding than PEG, this could explain their high nonspecic protein resistance capability mediated by higher charge density (Cao and Jiang 2012). Since synthetic zwitterionic materials like poly(carboxybetaine) (pCB) and poly(sulfobetaine) (pSB) (Fig.16.6) have strong hydration shells, they have been suggested as PEG substitutes. This property imparts them with low immunogenicity while also mak­ing them more resistant to nonspecic protein fouling (Yang etal. 2009; Jiang and Cao 2010). These polyelectrolytes’ excellent non-fouling properties are due to their intense hydration, which is caused by electrostatic interactions between the ionic functional groups and water molecules. This property is essential in the construction of polymer protein conjugates, self-assembled nanoparticles, and vesicles. Poly(zwitterions) are very hydrophilic and poorly soluble in most nonpolar sol­vents, in contrast to PEG (Cao et al. 2011; Keefe and Jiang 2012; Jiang and Cao 2010).
Here’s how poly(zwitterions) are used for PEGylation and their applications in drug delivery systems. Like PEGylation, polyzwitterion conjugation can improve the pharmacokinetics of drugs and therapeutic molecules. They can, therefore, extend the drug’s circulation time in the bloodstream, increasing its bioavailability. Poly(zwitterions), due to their neutral charge and biocompatible properties, can reduce the immunogenic response of the drug. This is important for enhancing the safety prole of biopharmaceuticals. It can create a hydrophilic surface that resists protein adsorption, which helps prevent opsonization. Opsonization can mark drug delivery systems for removal by the immune system, so minimizing this process improves drug delivery efciency (Laschewsky 2014). Poly(zwitterions) can be used as biocompatible coatings on medical implants and devices to reduce the risk of inammation and infection. Their biocompatibility and resistance to protein adsorption make them ideal for improving the safety and performance of medical implants. Additionally, poly(zwitterions) can be used to functionalize nanoparticles or liposomes for drug delivery to tumor sites. The stealthy nature of the polymer can
468
S. Mohanta et al.
help evade the immune system and enhance tumor-specic drug delivery (Zheng etal. 2017), potentially improving the efcacy of cancer treatments. The use of polyzwitterions for PEGylation offers a versatile and biocompatible alternative to traditional PEGylation, and it continues to be an area of active research in the devel­opment of advanced drug delivery systems and biomaterials. Although poly(zwitterions) have substantial advantages, more research may be required to establish them as an alternative to PEG polymers.

16.5.2 Poly(Glycerols)

Poly(glycerols) (PGs) have recently emerged as a potential alternative to PEG in a variety of pharmaceutical applications. Frey and colleagues rst synthesized PGs, and their applications werefurther explored and expanded by the research groups of Haag and Brooks (Imran Ul-Haq etal. 2012; Kainthan etal. 2006; Kurniasih etal.
2015). Poly(glycerols) of various molecular weights have been synthesized in a
highly regulated manner using anionic ring-opening polymerization of glycidol (Kainthan etal. 2006; Kurniasih etal. 2015; Sunder etal. 1999). Poly(glycerols) are hyperbranched, compact structures with high hydrophilicity and biocompatibility. Their low intrinsic viscosity in water and a structure amenable to multifunctional­ization make them attractive alternatives to PEG.
Poly(glycerols) are extremely hydrophilic polymers with a high attraction for water. This characteristic avoids protein and other biomolecule adsorption on the surface of drug carriers or biomaterials, resulting in a hydrophilic and “stealthy” layer. This, like PEG, decreases opsonization (the immune system’s identication and clearance of foreign elements) and increases circulation times. Poly(glycerols) are biocompatible and are less prone to elicit an immunological response. They lack the immunogenicity that certain other materials may have, which is critical for improving the safety of drug delivery systems and biomaterials. Poly(glycerol) characteristics, such as molecular weight and architecture, can be tuned to tailor their performance to specic applications. This adaptability enables researchers to optimize drug delivery systems for various therapeutic objectives (Sunder etal. 1999).
A variety of chemical processes can be used to conjugate poly(glycerols) to drug carriers or nanoparticles. The specic chemistry used is determined by the func­tional groups present on the polymer and the drug carrier’s surface. The following is a general overview of how poly(glycerols) can be conjugated: both poly(glycerol) and the drug carrier must be functionalized with reactive groups. Hydroxyl (-OH), amino (-NH2), and carboxyl (-COOH) groups are the typical functional groups required for PG conjugation (Gheybi etal. 2018). Esterication, amide bond forma­tion, and click chemistry are examples of common chemistries involved. Suppose both the poly(glycerol) and the carrier have hydroxyl groups. In that case, they can be conjugated by activating one with a coupling reagent (e.g., N-hydroxysuccinimide or NHS) and reacting it with the other, which has compatible functional groups (Cao et al. 2016). In some circumstances, poly(glycerols) may be utilized for
16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
469
surface modication rather than direct conjugation. In this case, the polymer forms a protective layer over the drug carrier or nanoparticle, resulting in a biocompatible, stealthy surface.
The poly(glycerols) employed and the chemistry used for conjugation will be determined by the application and desired attributes of the drug delivery system. Due to their high purity and quality, poly(glycerols) are essential in drug delivery systems and biomaterial applications. They must undergo biocompatibility testing to assess their safety and interactions with biological systems. Chemical compati­bility with other drug delivery system components is crucial, and contamination control is essential to assure sterility. The optimal dosage and concentration of poly(glycerols) should be determined, as excessive amounts may not improve the PEG-like effect and may result in unnecessary exposure (Abbina etal. 2017).
Like poly(glycerol), PEGylated liposomes are a commonly studied and utilized drug delivery system. These liposomes have a poly(glycerol) PEG layer on their surface, which provides improved biocompatibility and stability. Poly(glycerol) PEGylated liposomes have shown high biocompatibility, low cytotoxicity, minimal immune response, and extended circulation times in the bloodstream. They do not exhibit acute toxicity, but exposure to high concentrations may cause adverse effects (Liang etal. 2010). They should be prepared and handled under sterile conditions to prevent contamination. The optimal dosage and concentration for each drug deliv­ery application should be determined, achieving desired PEG-like effects while minimizing overexposure risk.
Kizhakkedathu’s research group has created biodegradable PGs by including acid-sensitive ketal moieties. They were able to establish high degradation proles, which aided in the reduction of hepatic and renal biodistributions. They found no appreciable PG buildup during the 1–7day injection period. Because of these out­standing features, PGs may be promising candidates for developing long-circulating multifunctional drug delivery systems. There are a few PG-based investigational therapeutics that are undergoing clinical testing at various stages (Shenoi etal.
2016, 2012; Yu etal. 2012).

16.5.3 Poly(Amino Acids)

Poly(amino acids) have been extensively researched as structural and biofunctional structural materials for applications in drug delivery, and they are typically synthe­sized via condensation polymerization of amino acid monomers (Romberg etal.
2007; Obst and Steinbüchel 2004; Sun etal. 2011). Poly(amino acids) are a poten-
tial alternative to PEG due to their charged side chains, biodegradability, biocom­patibility, and minimal toxicity. Though they are hydrophilic in nature, they can be easily functionalized into the polymer backbone with groups like alcohol, amine, and thiol (Nishikawa and Ogawa 2004) (Fig.16.9).
Poly(amino acids) exhibit a “PEG-like effect” in drug delivery and biomaterial applications, improving pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility. They are hydro­philic, preventing protein adsorption through a “stealthy” layer, and biocompatible,
470
Fig. 16.9 Chemical structure of poly(amino acid)s
S. Mohanta et al.
reducing immune responses. They are also customizable, allowing researchers to optimize drug delivery systems for various therapeutic goals. This effect is attrib­uted to their strong afnity for water, biocompatibility, and ability to be tailored to specic applications.
Poly(amino acids) can be conjugated to drug carriers or nanoparticles through various chemical reactions, depending on the functional groups on the polymer and the drug carrier’s surface. Typical functional groups include amino (-NH2), car­boxyl (-COOH), and thiol (-SH). The specic chemistry used for conjugation depends on the functional groups involved, such as amide bond formation, click chemistry, and thiol-disulde exchange reactions. For example, suppose both the poly(amino acid) and carrier have carboxyl groups. In that case, they can be conju­gated by activating one with a coupling reagent like N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and reacting with the other with amino groups. Poly(amino acids) can also be used for surface modication, creating a protective layer around the drug carrier or nanoparticle. The choice of poly(amino acids) and the specic chemistry used for conjugation depends on the application and desired properties of the drug delivery system (Yang etal. 2006).
PEGylated nanoparticles are a widely used drug delivery system with a poly(glutamic acid) PEG layer on their surface, providing enhanced biocompatibil­ity and stability. Studies have shown that these nanoparticles exhibit low cytotoxic­ity and minimal immune response, and in vivo studies in animal models show extended circulation times in the bloodstream. Toxicity studies show that these nanoparticles do not exhibit acute toxicity, but extensive exposure to high concen­trations may lead to adverse effects. They should be prepared and handled under sterile conditions to prevent contamination. The optimal dosage and concentration should be determined for each specic drug delivery application, achieving desired PEG-like effects while minimizing overexposure risk. Safety proles can vary depending on the particular poly(amino acid) used and its application, and detailed safety assessments and studies are essential (Mccormick-Thomson etal. 1989).
Poly(amino acids) are used in a variety of biopharmaceutical and cosmetic appli­cations, as well as for environmental and agricultural purposes (Sun etal. 2011; Li and Wallace 2008; Shima and Sakai 1977). There are many natural poly(amino acids) such as cyanophycin, poly(alanine), poly(-glutamic acid), and poly(lysine), as well as synthetic poly(amino acids) like poly(hydroxyethyl-L-glutamine) and poly(hydroxyethyl-L-asparagine) have been investigated for various applications. Phase III clinical studies have also investigated poly(L-glutamic acid) (PGs). PGs
16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
471
nd other applications as well, such as their use as a food thickening agent, in fertil­izers, and in cosmetics as a wetting agent. Even though poly(amino acids) have made great advances in recent years, they still have aws, particularly synthetic restrictions (Romberg etal. 2007; Yang etal. 2010; Shih etal. 2004; Melancon and Li 2011).

16.5.4 Poly(Oxazolines)

Poly(oxazolines) (POX) are another intriguing class of bioinspired polymers that have been investigated for various pharmaceutical applications. POX is biocompat­ible, can prevent rapid clearance, and control protein adsorption. They are neutrally charged and exhibit high stability and solubility in both polar and nonpolar solvents. POX also comes in a variety of architectural and chemical congurations. They are easily synthesized using the controlled cationic ring-opening polymerization of cyclic oxazolines (Guillerm etal. 2012). In many cases, the physicochemical fea­tures of POX have been reported to be equivalent to those of PEG, and they may be easily modied by inserting various functional groups on the monomer’s oxazoline ring and altering the monomer concentration (Guillerm etal. 2012; Lava etal. 2015; Hoogenboom 2009) (Fig.16.10).
Poly(oxazolines) are polymers that mimic the characteristics of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), exhibiting a PEG-like effect in drug delivery and biomaterials. They have hydrophilicity, creating a protective layer on drug delivery systems or bioma­terials, minimizing protein adsorption, and immune system recognition. They also produce a stealth effect by reducing interactions with serum proteins and cells, ensuring the stability of the drug delivery system. Their biocompatibility reduces adverse reactions and improves safety.
Poly(oxazolines) can be conjugated to various molecules, surfaces, or particles through various chemical reactions, depending on the functional groups of the poly­mer and the substrate. These reactions can be initiated during synthesis or post­polymerization. Poly(oxazolines) can be conjugated to a substrate using amidation, thiol-ene click reactions, or carbodiimide-mediated coupling. If both the polymer and substrate have reactive functional groups, they can be linked to form a stable covalent bond. Poly(oxazolines) can also be used to modify nanoparticles, micelles, or other drug delivery systems, providing a stealthy and biocompatible surface
Fig. 16.10 Chemical structure of poly(2-ethyl-2­oxazoline), PEOXA, a poly(oxazoline)
472
S. Mohanta et al.
(Harris etal. 2019). The choice of poly(oxazolines) and chemistry for conjugation depends on the application and desired properties of the drug delivery system. Poly(oxazolines) are promising alternatives to PEG, offering similar benets in drug delivery and biomaterial applications while providing opportunities for ne­tuning their properties to meet specic biomedical needs (Sedlacek and Hoogenboom 2020).
Due to their high purity and quality, poly(oxazolines) are used in drug delivery sys­tems and biomaterial applications. They must undergo biocompatibility testing to assess their safety and interactions with biological systems. Chemical compatibility is also crucial, as incompatibilities can lead to degradation, reduced drug efcacy, or undesired by-products. Sterility and contamination control are essential to prevent con­tamination during the synthesis, handling, and storage of poly(oxazolines). The opti­mal dosage and concentration of poly(oxazolines) in drug delivery systems should be determined, as excessive amounts may not improve the PEG-like effect and may result in unnecessary exposure. These precautions ensure the safety and performance of the materials used in these applications (Kronek etal. 2013).
Poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) (PMeOx) is a poly(oxazoline) polymer used to modify micelles for drug delivery applications. These micelles have shown high biocompatibility, minimal cytotoxicity, and low immunogenicity in invitro studies. In vivo studies in animal models indicate that they extend circulation in the blood, reducing protein adsorption and opsonization, enhancing safety. Toxicity studies show that PMeOx-modied micelles do not exhibit acute toxicity, but excessive exposure may lead to adverse effects. Sterility is crucial for handling PMeOx­modied micelles (Drago etal. 2021). The optimal dosage and concentration should be determined for each specic drug delivery application, achieving PEG-like effects while minimizing overexposure risk. Safety proles can vary depending on the poly(oxazolines) used and the application, thereby necessitating detailed safety assessments and studies.
As an alternative to PEGylation, the concept of POXylation has been warmly embraced. Various POX polymers, particularly poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEtOx) and poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) (PMeOx), have been studied for self-assembly applications mediated by physical and chemical coupling techniques. They have also been explored as a stealth polymer for therapeutics and antimicrobial agent delivery. As they are thermo-sensitive, they have also been applied in responsive polymers and hydrogels (Viegas etal. 2011; Hoogenboom 2009; Seeliger etal. 1966).
16.5.5 Poly(Acrylamides) andAllied Other Systems
Several research groups have made substantial contributions towards developing vinyl-based polymers as a viable substitute for PEG over the last 50 years. Polyacrylamide, a derivative of acrylamide, has been utilized for various applica­tions, primarily as a support matrix for electrophoresis (Milla etal. 2012; Nag and Awasthi 2013). Nonionic polyacrylamides can be linear, branched, or substituted. Some of the properties that make polyacrylamide a promising candidate are its
16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
473
biocompatibility, nontoxicity, cost-effectiveness, and stability over a wide pH range (pH3–11), (Amoozgar and Yeo 2012; Kadajji and Betageri 2011; Nag and Awasthi
2013) (Fig.16.11).
Poly(acrylamides) exhibit a PEG-like effect due to their hydrophilicity and steric hindrance, creating a protective layer on drug delivery systems or biomaterials. This prevents protein adsorption, thereby enhancing drug bioavailability. Poly(acrylamides) are biocompatible, reducing immune responses and adverse reactions. Their properties can be adjusted to optimize performance for specic applications, allowing researchers to ne-tune their performance.
Poly(acrylamides) can be conjugated to drug carriers or nanoparticles through various chemical reactions, depending on the functional groups present on the poly­mer and the drug carrier’s surface. Functional groups like amino (-NH2), carboxyl (-COOH), or thiol (-SH) can be introduced during synthesis or post-polymerization. Chemical conjugation can occur through amidation, thiol-ene click reactions, and carbodiimide-mediated coupling. If both polymers have reactive functional groups, they can be linked to form a stable covalent bond. Poly(acrylamides) can also be used to modify the surface of nanoparticles, micelles, or other drug delivery sys­tems, providing a hydrophilic and biocompatible layer for enhanced stability and circulation times (Liu etal. 2016a).
Poly(acrylamides) are essential materials in drug delivery systems and biomate­rial applications, but they must be of high purity and quality to ensure safety and performance. Biocompatibility testing is crucial to assess their safety and interac­tions with biological systems, including invitro and invivo studies. Chemical com­patibility is essential to prevent degradation, reduced drug efcacy, or unwanted by-products. Sterility and contamination control are imperative to prevent contami­nation during the synthesis, handling, and storage of poly(acrylamides). Dosage optimization is crucial to determine the optimal dosage and concentration of poly(acrylamides) in drug delivery systems, as excessive amounts may not improve the PEG-like effect and may result in unnecessary exposure (Pathania etal. 2016).
Poly(acrylamide) hydrogels are used in tissue engineering due to their biocom­patibility, low cytotoxicity, and compatibility with surrounding tissues. They do not exhibit acute toxicity, but cross-linking and polymerization are crucial. Sterile han­dling is essential to prevent contamination. The optimal dosage and concentration should be determined for each tissue engineering application to achieve desired therapeutic effects without unnecessary exposure. The safety prole can vary depending on the specic poly(acrylamides) used and the application (King and Noss 1989).
Fig. 16.11 Chemical structures of poly(acrylamide)s: (a) Polyacrylamide (PAM) and (b) partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA)
474
S. Mohanta et al.
Poly(acrylamides) are generally employed in hydrogels for applications in implantable devices, protein separation, and delivery of protein and oligonucle­otides. While polyacrylamide coating tends not to elicit an immune response, with negligible cytotoxicity, there are reports (Smith and Oehme 1991; Caló and Khutoryanskiy 2015) of its implants inducing an inammatory response. Another signicant disadvantage of these materials is the monomer’s highly hazardous side effects. These disadvantages limit polyacrylamides’ extensive use in biological applications. Poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide) (PHPMA) is a fascinat­ing acrylamide-based polymer, and its conjugates have been investigated in clinical studies, particularly with chemotherapeutics (Kopeček and Kopečková 2010; Ulbrich and Šubr 2010).

16.5.6 Poly(Vinylpyrrolidones)

Solubilizing chemicals tend to solubilize and enhance the bioavailability of several formulations. Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), povidone, is a commonly used excipi­ent and binder in the pharmaceutical industry. Over the previous four decades, sig­nicant advances have been made to commercialize PVP-based materials for a wide range of applications (Francis etal. 1998; Hsiao and Huang 2005; Liu etal. 2013) (Fig.16.12).
Poly(vinylpyrrolidones) are a class of polymers that can create a “PEG-like effect” in drug delivery and biomaterial applications. This effect is similar to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and involves the hydrophilicity and steric hindrance of poly(vinylpyrrolidones) to enhance the pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility of drug delivery systems. This hydrophilicity prevents protein adsorption, opsoniza­tion, and immune recognition, allowing the drug delivery system to circulate in the bloodstream for more extended periods, enhancing drug bioavailability. Poly(vinylpyrrolidones) are generally biocompatible, reducing the risk of adverse reactions. Additionally, the properties of poly(vinylpyrrolidones), such as molecular weight, architecture, and functional groups, can be adjusted to optimize
Fig. 16.12 Chemical structure of poly(vinylpyrrolidone)
16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
475
performance for specic applications, allowing researchers to ne-tune these prop­erties to meet the requirements of the drug delivery system (Koczkur etal. 2015).
Poly(vinylpyrrolidones) can be conjugated to drug carriers or nanoparticles through various chemical reactions, depending on the functional groups on the polymer and the drug carrier’s surface. Functional groups like amino (-NH2), car­boxyl (-COOH), or thiol (-SH) can be introduced during synthesis or post­polymerization. Chemical conjugation can occur through amidation, thiol-ene click reactions, and carbodiimide-mediated coupling. If both polymers have reactive functional groups, they can be linked to form a stable covalent bond. Poly(vinylpyrrolidones) can also be used to modify the surface of nanoparticles, micelles, or other drug delivery systems, providing a hydrophilic and biocompatible layer that enhances stability and circulation times. The choice of poly(acrylamides) and chemistry depends on the application and desired drug delivery system proper­ties (Zelikin etal. 2007).
Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) is a drug delivery system that requires strict qual­ity control and biocompatibility testing. Its chemical compatibility with other drug delivery components is crucial to prevent degradation or reduced efcacy. Sterility and contamination control are essential to prevent contamination. The optimal dos­age and concentration of PVP should be determined to ensure the best PEG-like effect and avoid unnecessary exposure (Yu etal. 2009).
PVP is a widely used material for drug delivery. Studies have shown that PVP­modied liposomes have low cytotoxicity and extended circulation times in the bloodstream, enhancing drug delivery safety and efcacy. Toxicity studies reveal that PVP-modied liposomes do not exhibit acute toxicity, but thorough preparation and purication are crucial. Sterility is also essential to prevent contamination. The optimal dosage and concentration of PVP-modied liposomes should be deter­mined for each specic drug delivery application, achieving PEG-like effects while minimizing overexposure risks (Schwarz 2018). The safety prole varies depending on the PVP used and the application, and detailed safety assessments and studies are essential.
PVP’s strong hydration shell aids in inhibiting immune system interaction and enabling enhanced blood circulation and minimal protein adsorption. PVP degrades slower than PEG when exposed to ultraviolet light. PVP-based compounds are used in several industries with applications in adhesives, dyes, coatings, photoresists, photography, textiles, bers and textiles, disinfectants, and food additives (Liu etal.
2013). PVP can be synthesized in various molecular weights by free and controlled
radical polymerization methods. As with polyacrylamides, the free monomer in PVP should be entirely eliminated because it is highly carcinogenic. Although PVP’s biocompatibility is promising, it suffers from issues such as uncertain immu­nological behavior and organ accumulations above excretion limitations (Le Garrec etal. 2002; Torchilin 1998; Zelikin etal. 2007).
476
Fig. 16.13 Chemical structure of Poly [oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate] (POEGMA)
S. Mohanta et al.
16.5.7 Poly[Oligo(Ethylene Glycol) Methyl Ether
Methacrylate] (POEGMA)
POEGMA is a water-soluble polymer composed of numerous ethylene glycol (EG) chains grafted over a hydrophobic methyl methacrylate framework (Lutz 2008). The hydrophilicity and biocompatibility of methacrylate polymers are linked to oli­goethylene glycol (EG) chain grafting, which makes them appropriate for applica­tion in biomedicine. Lutz’s and coworkers further demonstrated thermo-responsive behavior and antifouling properties of POEGMA (Lutz etal. 2007). POEGMA was developed as an alternative to linear PEG by modifying PEG into a bottlebrush design to address PEG-associated ABC (Joh etal. 2019). POEGMA, which was synthesized, has a 3D hyperbranched structure with numerous side chains of EG moieties and effective stealth characteristics (Pires-Oliveira etal. 2020; Hucknall etal. 2009) (Fig.16.13).
POEGMA is often conjugated with various therapeutic agents, such as peptides (Qi etal. 2016), proteins (Liu etal. 2014), nanoparticles (Nastyshyn etal. 2020), nanocrystals (Roberts etal. 2020), and micelles (Skandalis and Pispas 2017; Zhao etal. 2016). This can prevent immunogenicity and improve the circulation half-life of these therapeutics, resulting in better efcacy. Moreover, this hydrophilic poly­mer also has wider applications in the eld of gene delivery (Üzgün etal. 2010), tumor targeting (Sano etal. 2022), and tissue engineering (Harrison etal. 2015).

16.5.8 Polypeptides

Polypeptides have various advantages over PEG (polyethylene glycol) and may be a better choice in some cases. Here are some of the reasons why polypeptides are employed as PEG substitutes:
(a) Polypeptides, made up of amino acids, are biodegradable and can be broken
down by the body’s enzymatic processes, making them suitable for applications where long-term retention is not desired.
(b) They are also minimally immunogenic, as they are based on naturally occurring
sequences in the human body, making them suitable for immunogenicity con­cerns. Polypeptides can be designed with specic targeting sequences, allowing for more precise drug delivery (González-Aramundiz etal. 2012).