Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5373_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
8 PEGylated Nanocarriers forGene Therapy
Fig. 8.2 De-PEGylation technology in liposomes. PEG molecules on the liposome’s surface are cleaved once the liposome binds to the suitable target cell through specic identication of the receptor by the ligand. Gene delivery is made more effective by the release of PEG, which speeds up membrane fusion of the liposome and liposome breakdown
247
with them. In general, steric barrier stability and circulation time are higher in lipo­somes that have a brush-like covering. PEGylated liposomes, on the other hand, exhibit noticeably decreased cellular uptake or endosomal escape, which lessens the overall effect of gene silencing (de Souza Guimaraes etal. 2022).
Recurrent PEG-liposome injection is thought to cause fast blood clearance, which dramatically reduces the drug’s therapeutic impact. Activated B-cells gener­ate IgM antibodies following the initial injection. The subsequent delivery results in drug-IgM binding, complement system activation, and macrophage liposome cap­ture (Koudelka etal. 2016). This phenomenon is an incredibly quick immunological response that happens 10 min after the initial intravenous administration. Additionally, it appears that spleen is the primary generator of anti-PEG IgM. It should be noted that, the rate of immune response activation is higher when nucleic acids are used to stimulate the immune response and that the release of IgM anti­bodies is dosage dependent. However, because of MPS cell saturation, the third and subsequent injections of PEG-liposomes do not have such a dramatic effect (Wang etal. 2023).
Shroff etal. created PEGylated liposomes with the bronectin-mimetic peptide­amphiphile PR_b integrated into their bilayer, which may target a variety of cancer cells which can overexpress, including the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells uti­lized in this investigation. To maximize the therapeutic potential of doxorubicin through PEGylation and active targeting to cancer cells, we have encapsulated it inside liposomes (Shroff and Kokkoli 2012). The ndings demonstrate that PR_b- ­functionalized stealth liposomes could bind to MDA-MB-231 cells with high speci­city, and the binding would be modulated by peptide concentration. When the intracellular trafcking of the doxorubicin liposomes was investigated, it was shown that most of them were likely in the early endosomes minutes after administration, while after a longer length of time, they have been collected in the late endosomes and lysosomes. Particularly at higher doxorubicin concentrations, it was discovered
248
L. Mishra et al.
that the functionalized liposomes delivered more cytotoxicity than that of nontar­geted and GRGDSP-functionalized stealth liposomes and were just as lethal as free doxorubicin (Demirgoz etal. 2008).
In order to efciently and specically transport their therapeutic payload to the breast cancer cells, the PR_b-functionalized PEGylated nanoparticles investigated in this study present a viable approach.

8.3.2 PEGylated Micelles

Anticancer drug-containing polymeric micelles were rst created independently by Kataoka and Kabanov. Anti-cancer medications are integrated into micelles with the help of chemical conjugation or physical entrapment. Clinical experiments are being conducted on several micelles, and the polymer-micelle system is developing. Micelles are also utilized in the system for delivering genes. A PIC can self- assemble from a cationic polymer and DNA.In order to establish a complex with DNA, a block or graft copolymer made of hydrophilic-cationic polymers, including PEG­poly(-lysine) and PEG-poly[N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl] aspartamide (PEG­PAsp(DET)), is typically utilized. Numerous invitro and invivo tests have been conducted to show the impact of PEG shielding. PEG shielding, for instance, con­siderably reduces the accessibility and utilization of biomacromolecules, such as serum proteins, and attenuates the charged state of the polyplex, which inhibits the aggregation.
The Kataoka group has conducted substantial research on the creation of micelles utilized for gene delivery systems and has created a number of block copolymers, including PEG-PLL and PEG-PAsp(DET) (Torchilin 2007). Because its cationic component has been discovered to decay more quickly than PEG-PLL under vari­ous physiological settings, PEG-PAsp(DET) is the one that is largely studied as a potential carrier of genes. Due to the increase in cytotoxicity of the cationic poly­meric with molecular weight, biodegradability of the cationic polymer is crucial in minimizing toxicity. By reducing electrostatic contact, the breakdown of cationic polymers enables the release of plasmid DNA.PEG-PAsp(DET)’s effectiveness as a gene carrier has been assessed invivo (Cagel etal. 2017).
A variety of polyion complex (PIC) micelles were created by Gao etal., and PEGylated in a range of ratios (PEG2k and PEG550). To clarify the effect of PEGylation patterns on the biodistribution of micelles, comprehensive research was conducted on the murine macrophage absorption, plasma protein adsorption, and invivo biodistribution using iodine-125 as the tracer. They showed that the reticuloendothelial system (RES) cleared PEGylated micelles with shorter hydro­philic PEG chains mixed quickly on the surface, and that single PEG2k PEGylated micelles would effectively extend blood circulation time and increase their depo­sition over tumor sites (Shiraishi and Yokoyama 2019; Gao etal. 2013). The goal of the current work is to increase the comprehension of the PEGylation technique and create the best nanocarriers for medication administration and imaging applications.
8 PEGylated Nanocarriers forGene Therapy
249
Camptothecin (CPT), a weakly soluble anticancer medication andby Mu etal., prepared itsmicelles made from the blend of poly (ethylene glycol)-phosphatidyl ethanolamine conjugate (PEG-PE) and -tocopherol poly ethylene glycol 1000 suc­cinate (TPGS) (Mu etal. 2005). When compared to previously described PEG-PE­only micelles, the solubilization of CPT by the mixture of micelles ware found more effective. The developed formulationi.e.CPT-loaded mixed micelles, remain stable throughout storage as well as ondilutionalso, the cytotoxicity of the mixed micelles containing CPT was noticeably greater when compared to the free drug against the number of cancer cells. For poorly soluble medicines and imaging applications, PEG-PE/TPGS mixed micelles may be used as therapeutic nanocarriers with increased solubilization capability (Mu etal. 2005; Gao etal. 2008).

8.3.3 PEGylated Nanogels

Nanoparticles made of a polymers network and cross-linked chemically or physi­cally are referred to as nanogels. In PEGylated nanogel particles with a polyamine core that has undergone chemical cross-linking and a PEG surface 94. The PEGylated nanogels exhibit greater durability against very diluted and high salt environments than those of self-assembled nanocarriers like liposomes and micelles due to their covalently cross-linked polyamine gel core (Tamura etal. 2011). In vitro,studies suggested that it was possible to stabilize nucleic acids and effectively deliver them inside the cells with success; but when nanogel was injected intrave­nously inside the bloodstream, it tended to mix with anionic serum proteins in order to produce substantial aggregates. Although, the non-fouling characteristics of the nanogel surface needs to be enhanced in order to use nanogels as a gene delivery mechanism for systemic applicability (Chen etal. 2018).
Nanogels may to some extent expose amino groups, that connect to serum pro­teins and cells that are outside the particle due to their loosely cross-linked gel structure. Moreover, the PEGylated nanogels that had a cross-linked density of 5% demonstrated the lowest toxicity (LD50>200 mg/kg), that is quite sufcient for invivo utilities. In reality, the nanogel caused severe hemolysis when the cross­linking density is of 1%. It was necessary to further raise the PEG corona density in order to further enhance the bioinert nature of nanogels. This stable nanoparticle is useful for researching how PEGylation alters the physicochemical parameters of the nanoparticle surface and affects in vivo pharmacokinetics characteristics (Gupta et al. 2015). High PEG-density nanogels can be created using the new post­PEGylation procedure, that refers to a quaternized reaction involving the amine in the nanogel core as well as the bromobenzyl-terminated PEG, in order to create long-circulation nanogels (Fig. 8.2). In comparison to nanogels without post­PEGylation, those that had it considerably increased the blood circulation time. This work unequivocally shows how PEGylation of nanoparticles affects their bio­distribution (Vijayan etal. 2017).
Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) prepared by Nakamura et al. in poly-[2-(N,N- diethylamino) ethyl methacrylate] (PEAMA) gel core, the PEGylated nanogel
250
L. Mishra et al.
including GNPs synthesized at pH6and 60°Ctemperature, (PEGylated GNG) was shown the maximum GNP-loading capacity (Nakamura et al. 2010). PEGylated GNG showed an outstanding photothermal efcacy (ΔT=7.7°C) when exposed to an Ar ion (Ar+) laser at a uence of 39Wcm−2 for 6min (14kJcm−2). It should be noted that PEGylated GNG demonstrated non-cytotoxicity within the total absence of irradiation with Ar+ laser (480mgmL−1: >90% cell viability), while pronounced cytotoxicity (IC50=110μgmL−1) were noticed for PEGylated GNG according to irradiation supplied with Ar+ laser at a uence of 26 W cm−2 for at least 5 min (7.8kJcm−2), considering heat-generation from GNPs in the cells, and these resulted in selective and non-invasive cancer Photodynamic therapy (PTT). Consequently, a potential nanomedicine for cancer PTT would be PEGylated GNG, that has a high GNP-loading capacity (Miyamoto etal. 2008).

8.3.4 PEGylated Inorganic Nanoparticles

The topic of medicinal delivery has also sparked interest in inorganic nanoparticles. These inorganic nanoparticles, including silicon oxide, calcium phosphate, iron oxide, and gold are simple to manufacture with adjustable sizes and are simple to functionalize. Because of their low toxicity, gold nanoparticles have been exten­sively exploited in gene delivery systems; nonetheless, inorganic nanoparticles are often unstable and may prove hazardous in biological systems. Therefore, it is antic­ipated that surface modication will increase biological stability and compatibility (Karakoti etal. 2011). Inorganic nanoparticles can be made more stable and toxic­free by using PEG to modify their surfaces. Thiol groups, for instance, make good anchors for gold nanoparticles.
For the purpose of gene delivery invivo, Kawano etal. coupled electroporation with PEG-modied cationic gold nanoparticles. By reducing chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) with sodium borohydride (NaBH4) in the presence of 2-aminoethanol and PEG-SH, they created cationic gold nanoparticles. Plasmid DNA can be attached to resulting PEG-modied cationic gold nanoparticle. Mice were intravenously injected with DNA complexes including PEG-modied nanoparticles, and electro­poration was used to conrm gene expression (Chopra 2004). One issue is that under physiological settings, de-PEGylation of inorganic nanoparticles caused by mono-end-functionalized PEG frequently leads to particle aggregation. This issue might be solved by alternative methods of stabilizing gold nanoparticles, such as numerous anchoring among gold nanoparticle as well as functionalized PEG like penta-ethylene hexamine-ended PEG (N6-PEG). Other than gold nanoparticles, multiple anchoring technique can also be used to stabilize the inorganic nanoparticles.
For mesoporous silicon (PSi), a particular dual PEGylation (DPEG) technique was created by Nissinen etal., and put through in vitro as well as invivo testing (Nissinen etal. 2016). The half-life of the nanoparticles was increased from 1 to 241 min by the DPEG coating, which drastically altered their in vivo behavior. Additionally, uncoated nanoparticles would quickly deposit in the liver, whereas the spleen was where the coated particles accumulated. The particle’s protein coronas
8 PEGylated Nanocarriers forGene Therapy
251
varied greatly from one another. While the coated nanoparticles had proteins that could inhibit cellular uptake, the uncoated particles have signicantly more amount of proteins adsorbed, particularly liver and immune active proteins (Nakki et al.
2015). These factors, coupled with the agglomeration seen in blood circulation,
were determined to be the root causes of the variations in behavior invivo. By inserting superparamagnetic oxide of iron nanocrystals inside the pores of the par­ticles, which made dynamic imaging possible, the bio-fate of the particles was mon­itored by magnetic resonance imaging. The current study’s ndings open the door to further developmental strategies of the porous inorganic system for delivery in the sense of active targeting because the carriers are easily modiable chemically, enabling magnetically targeted distribution and diagnostics (Sarparanta etal. 2012).

8.3.5 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles

Polymer nanoparticles (PNPs) are tiny polymeric nanospheres (NS) and nano­capsules. Matrix particles, or those whose entire mass is solid, include nanospheres. The surface of the sphere or the particle matrix may have molecules adsorbed on it. Polymer nanoparticles have increasingly been expanding and they play important roles in a broad range of areas, such as photonics, electronics, conducting materials, sensors, healthcare, biotechnology, environmental control, and environmental tech­nology. Biodegradable nanoparticles are extensively employed in biotechnology and medicine to enhance the therapeutic efcacy of various medications. The solu­bility, bioavailability, retention duration, effectiveness, specicity, tolerability, and drug therapeutic index values of medicines that have been nano encapsulated in PNPs are all increased. PNPs can be functionalized to accomplish the so-called “intelligent targeting,” i.e., targeted distribution to certain cells, tissues, or organs (Lukasiewicz etal. 2021).
Several biodegradable polymers including polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolac­tone (PCL), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and polylactide-co-glycoside (PLGA) are being studied for efcient use in drug delivery systems. Numerous medications have been effectively encapsulated in PNPs to increase their bioactivity, bioavail­ability, and regulate delivery. Diseases include cancer, AIDS, insulin resistance, malaria, prion infections, and tuberculosis are the principal areas of application. When creating new drug delivery systems, PNP characteristics including toxicity, biocompatibility, biodistribution, and immunogenicity are critical. It is widely known that the criteria that affect these properties are the size, particles charges, and surface changes. The effects of possible nanocarriers that on cells of the immune system, which act as the body’s rst line of defense against dangers from the out­side, are particularly crucial to study (Xin etal. 2011).
It is essential to develop carriers that, to phagocytic cells like macrophages, are undetectable (“the stealth property”). Immune system cells called macrophages play a role in inammation. When activated, macrophages phagocyte harmful sub­stances like scavengers. When macrophages are exposed to pathogenic particulates, which may also be nanoparticles, this process of activation takes place. Because
252
nanoparticles are perceived as foreign and adequately ingested and digested by phagocytic cells, macrophages represent the rst obstacle in the route of pharma­ceutical nanocarriers to their destinations. Therefore, one of the primary objectives in developing novel methods for drug delivery is to reduce the absorption of PNPs by macrophages (Gajbhiye etal. 2020).
Paclitaxel (PTX)-loaded PEG-poly (trim ethylene carbonate) (MPEG-PTMC) NPs were investigated for their potential anticancer properties against glioblastoma multiforme by Xin etal. in 2010. Twelve hours after the intravenous injection, there was a considerably greater concentration of PEGylated NPs in the tissues of brain tumors. Additionally, PTX-loaded PEGylated NPs showed much greater in vivo anticancer effects than saline or Taxol, which resulted in a longer than the mean duration of survival for mice treated with them (27days) (Xin etal. 2010). Angiopep­anchored PEG-PCL NPs (ANG-PEG-PCL NPs) were created by a similar team of researchers to take advantage of the overexpressed low-density lipoprotein receptor­related protein 1 (LRP1) seen over the BBB as well as glioma cells. On U87 MG glioma cells, PTX-loaded ANG-PEG-PCL NPs showed better inhibitory effects. The research also showed that the intracranial U87 MG glioma tumor-bearing invivo model accumulated more targeted NPs (Xin etal. 2011).
L. Mishra et al.
8.4 Applications ofPEGylated Nanocarriers
forGene Delivery

8.4.1 Cancer

Cancer is one of the mysterious and terrifying disease which is the uncontrolled proliferation. Multicellular organisms have been shown to be affected by cancer for more than 200 million years, and the cancer evidence in the progenitors of contem­porary humans dates back around million years. However, in contrast to various infectious diseases, parasitic diseases, as well as many environmental diseases, this disease is not likely brought on by an outside factor. In cancer, human cells being having a sense of their uncontrolled growth, andwhich further changes into patho­genic organisms or the nuclei of tumors, often serves as its various agents of destruc­tion (Yin etal. 2021; Dart 2022).
Cancers are legitimately known to be “genetic diseases” because genetic muta­tions play a signicant part in the disease. Mutations are mainly responsible for causing and elevating the outcomes of the cancer, which canbe considered as a major factorfor induction of cancer. This is because external agents carry the huge potential to dismiss cellular functions and produce mutations, they also play greater role in the genesis of cancer (Ma etal. 2022; Chakravarty and Solit 2021).
Cancer gene therapy is a novel area of research promised with several potential treatments. The phrase “gene therapy” is known as a broad spectrum of medical procedures that utilizes genetic material to alter cells (either invitro or invivo) to treat a disease. Several preclinical and invitro animal models applicable to test a wide variety of gene therapy drugs have been demonstrated for astounding success.
8 PEGylated Nanocarriers forGene Therapy
253
Gene therapy is utilized for development of cancer vaccines, induction of target viruses to cancer cells for lysis and death, reducing the blood supply towards the tumor, and induce genes into the cancer cells which further causes death or restora­tion of normal cellular phenotype, and showed to improve survival in various mod­els of lung cancer (Giamas 2020; Giamas and Gagliano 2022).
Pegylated nanocarriers have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in the treat­ment of cancer. Figure8.3 represents multifunctional pegylated nanocarriers for cancer therapy. These nanocarriers can encapsulate medications and deliver them precisely to cancer cells with the least chances of harm to healthy cells. These nano­carriers have been “pegylated,” or have had polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains added to their surface. Because of the complexity of cancer biology and off-site toxicity with multidrug resistance, the conventional treatment regimen for use in cancer hav­ing a single chemotherapeutic agent falls far short of clinical expectations and is also linked to low Quality of Life (Gajbhiye etal. 2020; Jain and Nahar 2010).
The PEGylation of nanocarriers would shield both compounds from the harsh gastro-intestinal tract (GIT) GIT environment and subsequently encourage intestinal absorption through the lymphatic route into the systemic circulation This alteration can assist prevent their clearance and promote their accumulation in tumors by increasing their stability, lengthening the time they spend in the blood­stream, and decreasing their detection by the immune system. Many anticancer medications, including paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin, have been delivered via pegylated nanocarriers. For added cancer cell selectivity, they might be func­tionalized with targeted ligands like antibodies or peptides. Pegylated nanocarriers
Fig. 8.3 Multifunctional PEGylated nanocarriers for gene delivery in cancer cell
254
L. Mishra et al.
have been shown in studies to improve the therapeutic index of anticancer medi­cines by lowering their toxicity and boosting their efcacy (Koide etal. 2009; Wang etal. 2015a). They can also get around several drawbacks of conventional chemo­therapy, which includes low solubility, non-specic distribution, and drug resis­tance. Pegylated nanocarriers have a lot of potential for the development of safer and more effective cancer treatments.
Further study is required, though, to improve their layout, assess their long-term security, and deal with potential difculties including immunogenicity and drug resistance. Due to their capacity to safeguard and distribute therapeutic nucleic acids to cancer cells, PEGylated nanocarriers are an effective tool for cancer gene therapy. Mostly made of biodegradable polymers, these nanocarriers have a stable nanoparticle structure. The nanocarrier in cancer gene therapy can transfer different nucleic acids, like as plasmid DNA, small interfering RNA (siRNA), or microRNA (miRNA), which can control the expression of genes in cancer cells. For instance, miRNA can be used to restore the expression of tumor suppressor genes after miRNA has been used to quiet the expression of oncogenes (Muralidharan etal.
2014; Xue etal. 2015). In Table8.1, different kinds of PEGylated nanocarriers and
their clinical status is described.
8.4.1.1 Breast Cancer
PEGylated nanocarriers are a promising approach for gene therapy in breast cancer. Gene therapy involves the introduction of genes into cells to treat or prevent disease. However, the induction of genes to specic cells inside the body can be challenging. Nanocarriers are small particles which can encapsulate and induce therapeutic genes to targeted cells in the body. PEGylation, which is the process of attaching polyethylene glycol (PEG) onto the surface of the nanocarrier, increases their circu­lation time in the body and improves their stability (Braden et al. 2014; Liu etal. 2022).
In breast cancer, gene therapy can be used to target specic genes which are involved in the development and progression of the disease. For example, tumor suppressor genes can be introduced to retard the growth and spread of cancer cells. Nanocarriers can be designed to specically target breast cancer cells and deliver the therapeutic genes directly to the tumor site (Dastjerd etal. 2022).
Several types of PEGylated nanocarriers have been generated for gene therapy in breast cancer, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and dendrimers. These nanocarriers could be modied to enhance their targeting ability, enhance their sta­bility, and control the release of the therapeutic genes. Overall, PEGylated nanocar­riers offer a promising approach for gene therapy in case of breast cancer. While more research is needed to optimize their design and delivery, they have the huge potential to improve the effectiveness and reduce down the side effects of current breast cancer treatments. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of PEGylated nanocarriers for gene therapy in breast cancer. For example, one study used PEGylated liposomes to deliver a gene that inhibits tumor growth to breast cancer cells in vitro, resulting in a signicant reduction in tumor cell viability. Another study used PEGylated nanoparticles to deliver a gene that enhances the
8 PEGylated Nanocarriers forGene Therapy
255
immune response to breast cancer cells in a mouse model, resulting in a signicant reduction in tumor growth (Dastjerd et al. 2022; Bottai et al. 2017; Sahu and Pattanayak 2020).
Overall, the utilization of pegylated nanocarriers for gene therapy in breast can­cer holds great promise as a targeted and effective treatment strategy. However, future research is needed to optimize the design as well as delivery of these nanocar­riers, and signicantly evaluate their safety and efcacy in clinical trials.
8.4.1.2 Lung Cancer
Lung cancer is still the emerging cause of cancer death all over the world. More people will die from lung cancer than from breast, prostate, and colon cancers put together. Before the fth decade of life, lung cancer is quite uncommon; subse­quently, the risk rises with age. Women are less impacted than men. Remarkably, only 15% of smokers acquire lung cancer despite smoking being the exposure most closely linked to the disease (it is thought to be the cause of 80–90% of cases), pointing to a hereditary vulnerability (Bade and Dela Cruz 2020; Nasim etal. 2019).
PEGylated nanocarriers have also been investigated as an efcient delivery sys­tem for gene therapy in lung cancer. Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths around worldwide, and traditional treatment options including chemotherapy and radiation therapy often have limited efcacy and can cause sig­nicant side effects. Gene therapy using PEGylated nanocarriers offers a promising strategy for targeted and effective management of lung cancer (Shahbazi etal. 2023).
One of the emerging challenges in the treatment of lung cancer is the ability of cancer cells to develop resistance to chemotherapy and other treatments. Gene ther­apy using nanocarriers can be used to deliver genes that sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy or radiation therapy, making these treatments more effective. PEGylation of the nanocarriers can improve their stability and circulation time, allowing for targeted delivery of therapeutic genes into the cancer cells while mini­mizing toxicity to healthy tissues (Lara-Guerra and Roth 2016).
Several studies have shown the potential of PEGylated nanocarriers for gene therapy in lung cancer. For example, one study used PEGylated nanoparticles to deliver a gene that sensitizes cancer cells to radiation therapy in a mouse model of lung cancer, resulting in an efcient reduction in tumor growth. Another study used PEGylated liposomes to deliver a gene that inhibits tumor growth in lung cancer cells invitro. In addition to sensitizing cancer cells to traditional treatments, gene therapy using nanocarriers can also be used to deliver genes that improves the immune response against cancer cells. For example, a study using PEGylated nanoparticles to deliver a gene that enhances the immune response in a mouse model of lung cancer which resulted in a signicant reduction in tumor growth (Nair etal. 2020).
Overall, the use of pegylated nanocarriers for gene therapy in lung cancer holds great promise as a targeted and effective treatment approach. However, more research is required to optimize the design and delivery of these nanocarriers, and to evaluate their safety and efcacy in clinical trials.
256
L. Mishra et al.
8.4.1.3 Colon Cancer
Together with breast, prostate, and lung cancers, colon cancer is also one of the most common tumors worldwide and is regarded as a major cause of death. Being the sec­ond most leading cause of cancer-related death, colon cancer is a major global health concern. There are drawbacks and certain side effects which are associated with con­ventional cancer treatments such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. As a result, existing cancer treatment methods must be updated, and new methods must take their place. PEGylated nanocarriers for gene therapy present a potential approach for the focused and efcient treatment of colon cancer. The stability as well as circulation time of the nanocarriers can be increased through PEGylation, enabling the targeted delivery of therapeutic genes to cancer cells with the least amount of harm to normal tissues (Pawlik 2018; Otani etal. 2019; Zwacka and Dunlop 1998).
The capability of cancer cells to acquire resistance to chemotherapy and other treatments is one of the difculties in treating colon cancer. Nanocarrier-based gene therapy can be used to transfer genes that make cancer cells more susceptible to chemotherapy or radiation therapy, increasing the efcacy of these therapies. For instance, in a study utilizing PEGylated nanoparticles to carry a gene that makes colon cancer cells more susceptible to chemotherapy, the tumor growth in a mouse model of colon cancer was signicantly reduced.
Pishavar etal. (2020), in their study, they have studied about 5% and 3% of PAMAM primary amine and performed its substitution fortransmitting of the plas­mid encoding IL-12 gene. In colon cancer cells, the characteristics of modied PAMAMs incorporating size, surface charge density, cytotoxicity, and transfection efciency were examined. According to an invitro investigation, this modied car­rier was able to double the amount of IL-12 production when compared to the unmodied PAMAM.An effective and secure non-viral IL-12 gene for colon can­cer immunogens therapy may be produced by enhancing the polymer hydrophobic balance as well as by modulating the surface positive charge (Pishavar etal. 2020).
8.4.1.4 Brain Cancer
The most prevalent form of brain cancer, glioblastoma, is one of the most fatal and severe neoplasms and is known to be very invasive. The majority of brain cancer patients still have a poor prognosis, and the median survival time rarely surpasses 16months despite breakthroughs in surgery and medicine. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), which protected the central nervous system by acting as a semi-permeable membrane, greatly hinders drug transport to the brain (Tang etal. 2019).
PEGylated nanocarriers have been studied as a potential drug delivery system for gene therapy in brain cancer. Brain cancer, including gliomas and other types of brain tumors, are particularly challenging to treat due to the blood-brain barrier, which can prevent therapeutic agents from reaching the brain (Mehrabian etal. 2022).
PEGylation of nanocarriers can help to overcome this barrier by improving the stability and circulation time of the nanocarriers, allowing them to pass the blood­brain barrier and deliver therapeutic genes directly to the brain tumor cells. Additionally, PEGylation can reduce the clearance of the nanocarriers by the immune system, allowing for more effective and sustained delivery of therapeu­tic genes.