Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
27767_a54223ea22da16992fd4a387bbad362d.doc
Скачиваний:
291
Добавлен:
28.03.2016
Размер:
23.13 Mб
Скачать

Unit 4. Speech-Language Pathologist's Methods of Work

Text 1

The role of the speech-language pathologists in whole language

Task 1.

Read the text.

The speech-language pathologist should take a leadership role in whole language. Speech-language pathologists are the professionals who receive spe­cific training in language structure, its development, disorders, and intervention procedures. The speech-language pathologist has information about all aspects of language and their interrelation. An increasing amount of literature is be­coming available about whole language and its specific applications to lan­guage assessment and intervention. An enormous body of literature already ex­ists about the relationship of whole language to reading, writing, spelling, and learning across the curriculum. By reading and acquiring a thorough under­standing of whole language and its principles, the speech-language pathologist can not only provide better services to the children for whom direct interven­tion is provided, but can also work with other professionals through common curriculum and beliefs. This common ground will be increasingly important as service delivery models move toward collaborative consultation and the educa­tion for all children within regular education classrooms.

(Janet A. Norris. "Speech and Language Pathology". September, 1992.)

Task 2.

Get ready to interpret the article along the following lines:

  1. The role of a speech-language pathologist in whole language.

  2. His place in the work of professionals through common curricula.

  3. The relationship of whole language to reading, writing, spelling and learning across the curriculum.

Text 2 Speech and Language Disorders (concrete case) Part I. Lisa

Task 1.

Read about Lisa and get ready to characterise the girl's problem of be­haviour.

Lisa

Lisa, now 9, was never enrolled in preschool but entered kindergarten at age 5, when she was said (o be unintelligible and language delayed. In the course of the year, she kicked her teacher and other students, threw books, and frequently ran out of the classroom when she was asked to complete tasks. Lisa

20

was retained in first grade because she could not label common objects; de­scribe spatial, causal, or temporal relationships; or follow directions for small- group or independent work. During her second year in first grade, her refusals increased to the point that an evaluation team recommended half-day place­ment in a learning center where management systems brought her behavior un­der classroom control. By the end of second grade, Lisa had made virtually no progress in the district's adopted phonics-based reading series, but she began to follow directions and complete some tasks.

With a supplementary series based on a word-family approach instead of phonics, Lisa has recently developed a basic sight vocabulary of more than 100 words, and she can now read connected text and join a reading group. Peers in the reading group constitute her first successful social contacts. With intensive articulation therapy, she has reduced her consonant omissions and substitu­tions, but she still needs both individual and group sessions twice a week. Lan­guage therapy focused on concept building also continues in both individual weekly sessions with the SLP and group sessions delivered three times a week in her regular, third-grade classroom. The team monitoring her 1EP has tied im­provements in her speech intelligibility and language comprehension directly to gains in her classroom task behavior. As she begins to demonstrate academic progress, Lisa's status is 3 years behind expectations based on her nonverbal intellectual functioning.

Mary Ross Moran (from Excep­tional Children in today's Schools Ed L. Meyen University of Kansas Den­ver, 1990.)

Task2.

Give a sketch of Lisa, fill in the scheme in your copy-books.

Lisa

How the author characterises her

Age now

The level of

intelligence at

-

the age of 5.

Her behavior:

1 st grade

2 ud grade

3 d grade

The result of

language

*

Jherapy.

Task 3.

Give your reasons:

    1. What might be the relationship between Lisa's acting-out behavior in class and her unintelligibility and language delay?

    2. Why would the type of reading series adopted in her classroom affect Lisa's ability to profit from reading instruction?

    3. What are some nonverbal ways to provide directions behavior cues to a student like Lisa who cannot follow verbal instructions?

    4. How could a teacher offer incidental information to Lisa throughout the day to improve her grasp of common concepts about the world?

    5. Do you think she'll demonstrate academic progress in future?

Part II. Eric

Task 4.

Read the text and give your scheme of Eric's development.

Eric

Eric, age 14, attended preschool for 3 years and appeared to demonstrate readiness for reading and writing along with average intelligence when he en­tered first grade, although teachers' notes show that he stood out in class be­cause he volunteered irrelevant comments or questions at inappropriate times, interrupted teachers, and was generally loud, boisterous and off-task though neither noncompliant nor aggressive toward other students. Between grades two through four he fell behind peers in all language arts competencies. When his fourth-grade teacher noticed that he was omitting word endings and some verb forms in his speech, did not produce known words on demand, and omit­ted entire syllables in spelling words he could read, she referred Eric for evaluation. But test comparisons showed he scored just above the oral language and reading discrepancies that would have permitted service delivery under special education; the evaluation team determined that he did not demonstrate a covered handicapping condition. Unable to maintain classwork or homework in fifth grade, Eric was required to drop out of after-school sports programs in which he excelled to make time for daily tutoring provided by his family. A team reevaluated Eric in grade six and determined that he now met discrepancy criteria for learning disabilities services in reading and writing. He also demon­strated a mild central hearing loss, a syntax disorder, and a word-retrieval prob­lem. Eric could not use textbooks in his regular class without one-to-one help, produced fragments and run-ons full of misspelled words when asked to write a paragraph, and had withdrawn from school to the extent of inventing illnesses so he could stay home.

Intensive holistic language instruction delivered by the SLP, the sixth- grade teacher, and the reading specialist allowed Eric to focus for the remain­der of the year on a selected 500-word subject-matter and survival vocabulary for concept building, reading, spelling, oral and written sentence formulation,

22

and ultimately, paragraph construction. With preferential classroom seating, class text materials read onto tapes so he could play them repeatedly, intensive training in a learning strategy that taught him to preview and organize class texts to make comprehension more accessible, daily instruction in putting to­gether word strips to form modeled syntactic patterns, and flexible oral ques- tion-and-answer sessions to avoid laborious spelling demands, Eric began to improve oral communication and reading.

He was then willing to enter a group social-skills training program cen­tered on pragmatic language competencies and delivered by the SLP and one of the school counselors. With the same type of team instruction in grade seven, he improved to the point that his present eighth-grade program is predomi­nantly in mainstream core classes, with 1 hour a day in resource programs for oral and written language supplementary instruction in addition to a regular remedial English class. As soon as he had an individualized language program during school hours, Eric resumed after-school sports, and he has begun to ap­ply his new social skills to making afterschool friends. Eric is doing well but has lost time from intensive language instruction because his was a subtle, dif- ficult-to-identify set of communication problems.

Task 5.

Get ready the case and think of the way to тер the boy.

      1. Why would Eric have appeared to teachers to be ready for reading andwriting?

      2. When did have a hearing loss, a syntax problem and a word-retrievalproblem?

      3. What strengths were teachers apparently responding to?

      4. If Eric could not read textbooks in his regular fourth- and fifth-gradeclassrooms, how could teachers have modified this task to enable Eric to learncontent material even though he was not eligible for special services?

      5. Faced with a choice between a sports program in which Eric excelledor after- school tutoring in basic language competencies of reading and writingin which he constantly failed, what reasoning could a teacher follow to advisehis parents?

      6. Why would Eric's cluster of communication problems respond betterto a team approach (involving the SLP, the 6th-grade teacher, and the readingspecialist) than to individual therapies from the same staff?

Discuss the cases of Lisa and Eric in the form of a dialogue. Imagineyou re a speech pathologist or a psychologist. Suggest your ideal how to com-municate with such paliets. Use text 3.

23

Text3

Деятельность логопеда по исправлению речи

Task.

Read the text and call the main aims of logopedic studies. Render in English.

Логопедические занятия являются основной формой коррекционно- го обучения и предназначаются для систематического развития всех ком­понентов речи и подготовки к школе.

Основными задачами этих занятий являются:

        1. Развитие понимания речи; воспитание умения наблюдать и ос­мысливать предметы и явления окружающей действительности, что дает возможность уточнить и расширить запас конкретных представлений ре­бенка; формирование практических навыков словообразования и слово­изменения; умение употреблять простые распространенные предложения.

        2. Формирование правильного произношения звуков, развитие фо­нематического слуха и восприятия; закрепление навыков произнесения слов различной звуко-слоговой структуры; контроль за внятностью и вы­разительностью речи; нодготовка к усвоению элементарных навыков зву­кового анализа и синтеза.

        3. Обучение детей самостоятельному высказыванию. На основе сформированных навыков использования различных типов предложений у детей вырабатывается умение передавать впечатления об увиденном, о событиях окружающей действительности, в логической последовательно­сти пересказать содержание сюжетных картин и их серий, составлять рас­сказы-описания .

Весь процесс коррекционного обучения имеет четкую коммуника­тивную направленность. Усваиваемые элементы языковой системы должны включаться в непосредственное общение. Важно научить детей применять отработанные речевые операции в аналогичных или новых си­туациях, творчески использовать полученные навыки в различных видах деятельности.

Логопедические занятия по формированию лексико- грамматических средств языка и развитию связной речи строятся с уче­том требований как общей дошкольной, так и специальной педагогики.

Логопеду следует четко:

  • определить тему и цель занятий;

  • выделить предметный и глагольный словарь; словарь признаков, которые дети должны усвоить в активной речи;

  • отобрать лексический и грамматический материал с учетом темы и цели, этапа коррекционного обучения, индивидуального подхода к ре­чевым и психическим возможностям детей (при этом допускается ненор­мативное фонетическое оформление части речевого материала);

  • обозначить основные этапы занятия, показав их взаимосвязь и взаимообусловленность, и сформулировать цель каждого этапа;

24

_ обеспечить постепенное усложнение речевых и речемыслитель- ных заданий;

_ включить в занятия разнообразные игровые и дидактические уп­ражнения с элементами соревнования, контроля за своими действиями и действиями товарищей;

  • при отборе программного материала учитывать зону ближайше­го развития дошкольника, потенциальные возможности для развития мыслительной деятельности, сложных форм восприятия, воображения;

  • предусмотреть приемы, обеспечивающие при индивидуальном подходе к детям вовлечение их в активную работу и познавательную дея­тельность;

  • включить в занятие регулярное повторение усвоенного речевого материала.

Логопедические фронтальные занятия по формированию произно­шения строятся с учетом задач и содержания каждого периода обучения.

ii