- •Т.Н. Тарасова, сл. Савина, и.Ю. Барышникова
- •Unit 1. Language and Behavior Text 1 The Nature of Language and Symbolic Behavior
- •Part 1
- •Unit 2. Special Education
- •Text 1Special Schools
- •Unit 3. Integration as a principle of special education Text 1 The programme of intervention
- •Text 1
- •Text 2 Speech and Language Disorders (concrete case) Part I. Lisa
- •Language development and the Home
- •Unit 6. Speech impairments: types and treatment
- •Text 1 Types of speech impairments Part 1. Voice problems
- •Text 2
- •Новые направления в коррекции минимальных дизартрических расстройств
- •Text 3 Мир без слов
- •Unit 8. Voice problems
- •Text 1Singing: a vocal mirage
- •Unit 9. Auditory-Oral Education
- •Text 1 Auditory-Oral Schools
- •Text 2
- •Организация индивидуальных занятий по развитию речевого слуха в начальных классах школы слабослышащих детей
- •Unit 10. Stuttering
- •Text 1 Parti. What stuttering is
- •Text 2 Кто чаще заикается?
- •Unit 11. RhinolaliaTask 1
- •Cleft palate
- •Text 2
- •Исследование нарушения осознания грамматических категорий слоев при афазии
- •Text 2
- •Иппотерапия - ведущий реабилитационный метод для детей с ограниченными возможностями
- •129226, Москва, 2-й Сельскохозяйственный пр., 4.
Unit
4.
Speech-Language
Pathologist's Methods of Work
The
role of the speech-language pathologists in whole language
Task
1.
Read
the text.
The
speech-language pathologist should take a leadership role in whole
language. Speech-language pathologists are the professionals who
receive specific training in language structure, its
development, disorders, and intervention procedures. The
speech-language pathologist has information about all aspects of
language and their interrelation. An increasing amount of literature
is becoming available about whole language and its specific
applications to language assessment and intervention. An
enormous body of literature already exists about the
relationship of whole language to reading, writing, spelling, and
learning across the curriculum. By reading and acquiring a thorough
understanding of whole language and its principles, the
speech-language pathologist can not only provide better services to
the children for whom direct intervention is provided, but can
also work with other professionals through common curriculum and
beliefs. This common ground will be increasingly important as
service delivery models move toward collaborative consultation and
the education for all children within regular education
classrooms.
(Janet
A. Norris. "Speech and Language Pathology". September,
1992.)
Task
2.
Get
ready to interpret the article along the following lines:
The
role of a speech-language pathologist in whole language.
His
place in the work of professionals through common curricula.
The
relationship of whole language to reading, writing, spelling and
learning across the curriculum.
Task
1.
Read
about Lisa and get ready to characterise the girl's problem of
behaviour.
Lisa
Lisa,
now 9,
was
never enrolled in preschool but entered kindergarten at age 5,
when
she was said (o be unintelligible and language delayed. In the
course of the year, she kicked her teacher and other students, threw
books, and frequently ran out of the classroom when she was asked to
complete tasks. Lisa
20Text 1
Text 2 Speech and Language Disorders (concrete case) Part I. Lisa
was
retained in first grade because she could not label common
objects; describe spatial, causal, or temporal
relationships; or follow directions for small- group or
independent work. During her second year in first grade, her
refusals increased
to the point that an evaluation team recommended half-day
placement in a learning center where management systems
brought her behavior under classroom control. By the end of
second grade, Lisa had made virtually no progress in the
district's adopted phonics-based reading series, but she began
to follow directions and complete some tasks.
With
a supplementary series based on a word-family approach instead
of phonics, Lisa has recently developed a basic sight vocabulary
of more than 100
words,
and she can now read connected text and join a reading group.
Peers in the reading group constitute her first successful
social contacts. With intensive articulation therapy, she has
reduced her consonant omissions and substitutions, but she
still needs both individual and group sessions twice a week.
Language therapy focused on concept building also continues
in both individual weekly sessions with the SLP and group
sessions delivered three times a week in her regular,
third-grade classroom. The team monitoring her 1EP has tied
improvements in her speech intelligibility and language
comprehension directly to gains in her classroom task behavior.
As she begins to demonstrate academic progress, Lisa's status is
3
years
behind expectations based on her nonverbal intellectual
functioning.
Mary
Ross Moran
(from Exceptional Children in today's Schools Ed L. Meyen
University of Kansas Denver, 1990.)
Task2.
Give
a sketch of Lisa, fill in the scheme in your copy-books. |
How the author characterises her |
Age now |
|
The level of |
|
intelligence at |
- |
the age of 5. |
|
Her behavior: |
• |
1 st grade |
|
2 ud grade |
|
3 d grade |
|
The result of |
|
language |
* |
Jherapy. |
|
Task
3.
Give
your reasons:
What
might be the relationship between Lisa's acting-out behavior in
class and her unintelligibility and language delay?
Why
would the type of reading series adopted in her classroom affect
Lisa's ability to profit from reading instruction?
What
are some nonverbal ways to provide directions behavior cues to a
student like Lisa who cannot follow verbal instructions?
How
could a teacher offer incidental information to Lisa throughout
the day to improve her grasp of common concepts about the world?
Do
you think she'll demonstrate academic progress in future?
Part
II. Eric
Task
4.
Read
the text
and give your scheme of Eric's development.
Eric
Eric,
age 14,
attended
preschool for 3
years
and appeared to demonstrate readiness for reading and writing along
with average intelligence when he entered first grade, although
teachers' notes show that he stood out in class because he
volunteered irrelevant comments or questions at inappropriate times,
interrupted teachers, and was generally loud, boisterous and
off-task though neither noncompliant nor aggressive toward other
students. Between grades two through four he fell behind peers in
all language arts competencies. When his fourth-grade teacher
noticed that he was omitting word endings and some verb forms in his
speech, did not produce known words on demand, and omitted
entire syllables in spelling words he could read, she referred Eric
for evaluation. But test comparisons showed he scored just above the
oral language and reading discrepancies that would have permitted
service delivery under special education; the evaluation team
determined that he did not demonstrate a covered handicapping
condition. Unable to maintain classwork or homework in fifth grade,
Eric was required to drop out of after-school sports programs in
which he excelled to make time for daily tutoring provided by his
family. A team reevaluated Eric in grade six and determined that he
now met discrepancy criteria for learning disabilities services in
reading and writing. He also demonstrated a mild central
hearing loss, a syntax disorder, and a word-retrieval problem.
Eric could not use textbooks in his regular class without one-to-one
help, produced fragments and run-ons full of misspelled words when
asked to write a paragraph, and had withdrawn from school to the
extent of inventing illnesses so he could stay home.
Intensive
holistic language instruction delivered by the SLP, the sixth- grade
teacher, and the reading specialist allowed Eric to focus for the
remainder of the year on a selected 500-word subject-matter and
survival vocabulary for concept building, reading, spelling, oral
and written sentence formulation,
22
and
ultimately, paragraph construction. With preferential classroom
seating, class
text materials read onto tapes so he could play them repeatedly,
intensive training
in a
learning strategy that taught him to preview and organize class
texts to make comprehension more accessible, daily instruction in
putting together word strips to form modeled syntactic
patterns, and flexible oral ques- tion-and-answer
sessions to avoid laborious spelling demands, Eric began to improve
oral communication and reading.
He
was then willing to enter a group social-skills training program
centered on pragmatic language competencies and delivered by
the SLP and one of the school counselors. With the same type of team
instruction in grade seven, he improved to the point that his
present eighth-grade program is predominantly in mainstream
core classes, with 1
hour
a day in resource programs for oral and written language
supplementary instruction in addition to a regular remedial English
class. As soon as he had an individualized language program during
school hours, Eric resumed after-school sports, and he has begun to
apply his new social skills to making afterschool friends. Eric
is doing well but has lost time from intensive language instruction
because his was a subtle, dif- ficult-to-identify set of
communication problems.
Task
5.
Get
ready the case and think of the way to тер
the
boy.
Why
would Eric have appeared to teachers to be ready for reading
andwriting?
When
did have a hearing loss, a syntax problem and a
word-retrievalproblem?
What
strengths were teachers apparently responding to?
If
Eric could not read textbooks in his regular fourth- and
fifth-gradeclassrooms,
how could teachers have modified this task to enable Eric to
learncontent
material even though he was not eligible for special services?
Faced
with a choice between a sports program in which Eric excelledor
after- school tutoring in basic language competencies of reading
and writingin
which he constantly failed, what reasoning could a teacher
follow to advisehis
parents?
Why
would Eric's cluster of communication problems respond betterto
a team approach (involving the SLP, the 6th-grade teacher, and
the readingspecialist)
than to individual therapies from the same staff?
Discuss
the cases of Lisa and Eric in the form of a dialogue. Imagineyou
re a speech pathologist or a psychologist. Suggest your ideal how to
com-municate
with such paliets. Use text 3.
23
Text3
Деятельность
логопеда по исправлению речи
Task.
Read
the text and call the main aims of logopedic studies. Render
in English.
Логопедические
занятия являются основной формой
коррекционно- го обучения и предназначаются
для систематического развития всех
компонентов речи и подготовки к
школе.
Основными
задачами
этих занятий являются:
Развитие
понимания речи; воспитание умения
наблюдать и осмысливать предметы
и явления окружающей действительности,
что дает возможность уточнить и
расширить запас конкретных
представлений ребенка; формирование
практических навыков словообразования
и словоизменения; умение употреблять
простые распространенные предложения.
Формирование
правильного произношения звуков,
развитие фонематического слуха
и восприятия; закрепление навыков
произнесения слов различной
звуко-слоговой структуры; контроль
за внятностью и выразительностью
речи; нодготовка к усвоению элементарных
навыков звукового анализа и
синтеза.
Обучение
детей самостоятельному высказыванию.
На основе сформированных навыков
использования различных типов
предложений у детей вырабатывается
умение передавать впечатления об
увиденном, о событиях окружающей
действительности, в логической
последовательности пересказать
содержание сюжетных картин и их
серий, составлять рассказы-описания
.
Весь
процесс коррекционного обучения имеет
четкую коммуникативную направленность.
Усваиваемые элементы языковой системы
должны включаться в непосредственное
общение. Важно научить детей применять
отработанные речевые операции в
аналогичных или новых ситуациях,
творчески использовать полученные
навыки в различных видах деятельности.
Логопедические
занятия по формированию лексико-
грамматических средств языка и развитию
связной речи строятся с учетом
требований как общей дошкольной, так
и специальной педагогики.
Логопеду
следует четко:
определить
тему и цель занятий;
выделить
предметный и глагольный словарь;
словарь признаков, которые дети должны
усвоить в активной речи;
отобрать
лексический и грамматический материал
с учетом темы и цели, этапа коррекционного
обучения, индивидуального подхода к
речевым и психическим возможностям
детей (при этом допускается ненормативное
фонетическое оформление части речевого
материала);
обозначить
основные этапы занятия, показав их
взаимосвязь и взаимообусловленность,
и сформулировать цель каждого этапа;
24
_
обеспечить постепенное усложнение
речевых и речемыслитель- ных заданий;
_
включить в занятия разнообразные
игровые и дидактические упражнения
с элементами соревнования, контроля
за своими действиями и действиями
товарищей;
при
отборе программного материала учитывать
зону ближайшего развития дошкольника,
потенциальные возможности для развития
мыслительной деятельности, сложных
форм восприятия, воображения;
предусмотреть
приемы, обеспечивающие при индивидуальном
подходе к детям вовлечение их в активную
работу и познавательную деятельность;
включить
в занятие регулярное повторение
усвоенного речевого материала.
Логопедические
фронтальные занятия по формированию
произношения строятся с учетом задач
и содержания каждого периода обучения.
ii