- •1. The subject of theoretical grammar. Its relations to practical grammar.
- •2. General characteristics of the grammatical structure of language.
- •It is demanded that all the students be present at the meeting.
- •3. Morphology and syntax as two main parts of grammar.
- •4.Language as a system and structure. Language levels. The notion of isomorphism.
- •The morphological level has two level units:
- •5. Dichtonomy(противопоставление 2х объектов)[даи’котеми] of language and speech
- •6. Systemic relations in language. Syntagmatic relations.
- •7. Systemic relations in language. Paradigmatic relations
- •8. Linguistic units and their peculiarities.
- •9.The morpheme as an elementary meaningful unit. Classification of morphemes.
- •10.The word as the smallest naming unit and the main unit of morphology.
- •11.Lexical and grammatical aspects of the word. Types of grammatical meaning.
- •12.Grammatical (morphological) categories. The notion of oppositions as the basis of grammatical categories.
- •13. Oppositional analysis.Types of oppositions. Reduction of grammatical oppositions.
- •14.Analytic and synthetic forms of English words. Analytic forms in the structure of English.
- •16.Parts of speech. Different approaches to the classification of parts of speech.
- •17. Criteria for establishing parts of speech: semantic, formal, functional. Notional and functional parts of speech.
- •18. The noun as part of speech. Morphological, semantic and syntactic properties of the noun. Grammatically relevant classes of nouns.
- •19. The category of number. Formal and functional features of the number category. The problem of number in different subclasses of nouns.
- •20. The category of case.The evolution of theoretical interpretations of the category of case in English.
- •21.The problem of gender in English. Personal pronouns as gender indicators of nouns.Sex distinctions in the system of the noun.
- •22. Noun determiners. The article.The problem of the zero article.
- •23. The verb as a part of speech. Grammatically relevant subclasses of verbs (transitive/intransitive, terminative/nonterminative).
- •Vaddr.-adv. I won’t keep you long
- •26. Finite and non-finite forms of the verb. The category of finitude.
- •27. The verbal categories of person and number.
- •28. The category of tense in English. Tense oppositions. Absolute and relative tense meanings of English tense-forms.
- •Present Past
- •Future I Future II
- •29. The problem of perfect.
- •31. The category of voice. Voice opposition. The number of voices in English.
- •32. The category of mood the problem of mood opposition. Mood and modality.
- •33. Function words in Modern English.
- •34. Syntax as a part of grammar. Kinds of syntactic theories.
- •35. Transformational-Generative Grammar.
- •36.Modern approaches to the language study: textlinguistics, pragmatics, discourse analysis.
- •37. Basic syntactic notions: syntactic units, syntactic relations, syntactic connections.
- •38. Coordination. The notion of parataxis.
- •39. Subordination. The notion of hypotaxis
- •40. General characteristic of the word-group.
- •41.Nominal word combination. Noun-phrases with pre-posed adjuncts
- •World peace – peace all over the world
- •Table lamp – lamp for tables
- •42. Nominal word combination. Noun-phrases with post-posed adjuncts.
- •43. Verbal word combinations. Types of verbal complements.
- •44. Predication. Primary and secondary predication. Predicative word combinations.
- •45. The sentence. Structural and semantic characteristics of the sentence. Different approaches to the study of the sentence.
- •Complication Contamination
- •Replacement – the use of the words that have a generalized meaning: one, do, etc, I’d like to take this one.
- •Ajoinment - the use of specifying words, most often particles: He did it – Only he did it.
- •46. Sentence – proposition – utterance – speech act.
- •47. The simple sentence. Principal, secondary and detached parts of the sentence.
- •48. The hierarchical structure of the sentence. Immediate Constituents Analysis.
- •Immediate constituents of the sentence. Ic analysis.
- •49. The paradigm of a simple sentence. Kernel and derived sentences. Syntactic processes.
- •The utterance. Informative structure of the utterance.
- •The utterance. Communicative and pragmatic types of utterance.
- •52. The complex sentence as a polypredicative construction. Types of subordinative clauses.
- •53. Text as a syntactic unit. Coherence, Cohesion, deixis as the main features of the text.
- •54. Textual connecting devices. Reiteration, collocation, endophoric relations.
- •56. Pragmatic approaches to the study language units.
- •57. Basic notions of pragmatic linguistics.
- •It’s hot excuse
- •58. Speech act theory.
- •59. Classification of speech acts.
- •Representatives make words fit the world s believes X
- •Expressives make words fit the world s feels X
- •Commissives make the world fit words s intends X
- •60. Indirect speech acts.
- •61. The study of language in use. Discourse analysis.
- •62. Maxims of conversation.
- •Make your contribution as informative as required
- •Be relevant
- •Be orderly
- •64. Implicatures and indirectness. The Politeness Principle.
- •It is only on the basis of assuming the relevance of b’s response that we can understand it as an answer to a’s question.
5. Dichtonomy(противопоставление 2х объектов)[даи’котеми] of language and speech
A dichotomy is any splitting of a whole into exactly two non-overlapping parts. The distinction between language and speech was made by Ferdinand de Saussure, the Swiss scholar usually credited with establishing principles of modern linguistics. Language is a collective body of knowledge, it is a set of basic elements, but these elements can form a great variety of combinations. In fact the number of these combinations is endless. Speech is closely connected with language, as it is the result of using the language, the result of a definite act of speaking. Speech is individual, personal while language is common for all individuals.
Language is opposed(противоположный) to speech and accordingly language units are opposed to speech units. The language unit phoneme is opposed to the speech unit – sound: phoneme /s/ can sound differently in speech - /s/ and /z/). The sentence is opposed to the utterance(дикция, произношение); the text is opposed to the discourse(дискуссия,разговор)
6. Systemic relations in language. Syntagmatic relations.
A linguistic unit can enter into relations of two different kinds: Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic relations.
A linguistic unit enters into syntagmatic relations with other units of the same level it occurs with. SR exist at every language level. E.g. in the word-group A PINT OF MILK the word PINT contrasts SR with A, OF, MILK; within the word PINT – P, I, N and T are in syntagmatic relations. SR are linear relations, that is why they are manifested in speech. They can be of three different types: coordinate, subordinate and predicative.
Coordinate SR exist between the homogeneous(однородный) linguistic units that are equal in rank, that is, they are the relations of independence: you and me; They were tired but happy.
Subordinate SR are the relations of dependence when one linguistic unit depends on the other: teach + er – morphological level; a smart student – word-group level; predicative and subordinate clauses – sentence level.
Predicative SR are the relations of interdependence: primary and secondary predication.
As mentioned above, SR may be observed in utterances, which is impossible when we deal with PR. Therefore, PR are identified with ‘language’ while SR are identified with ‘speech’.
7. Systemic relations in language. Paradigmatic relations
A linguistic unit can enter into relations of two different kinds: Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic relations.
It enters into paradigmatic relations with all the units that can also occur in the same environment. PR are relations based on the principles of similarity. They exist between the units that can substitute one another. For instance, in the word-group A PINT OF MILK the word PINT is in paradigmatic relations with the words bottle, cup, etc. The article A can enter into PR with the units the, this, one, same, etc. According to different principles of similarity PR can be of three types: semantic, formal and functional.
Semantic PR are based on the similarity of meaning: a book to read = a book for reading. He used to practice English every day – He would practice English every day.
Formal PR are based on the similarity of forms. Such relations exist between the members of a paradigm: man – men; play – played – will play – is playing.
Functional PR are based on the similarity of function. They are established between the elements that can occur in the same position. For instance, noun determiners: a, the, this, his, Ann’s, some, each, etc.
PR are associated with the sphere of ‘language’.
A linguistic unit enters into syntagmatic relations with other units of the same level it occurs with. SR exist at every language level. E.g. in the word-group A PINT OF MILK the word PINT contrasts SR with A, OF, MILK; within the word PINT – P, I, N and T are in syntagmatic relations. SR are linear relations, that is why they are manifested in speech. They can be of three different types: coordinate, subordinate and predicative.
Coordinate SR exist between the homogeneous linguistic units that are equal in rank, that is, they are the relations of independence: you and me; They were tired but happy.
Subordinate SR are the relations of dependence when one linguistic unit depends on the other: teach + er – morphological level; a smart student – word-group level; predicative and subordinate clauses – sentence level.
Predicative SR are the relations of interdependence: primary and secondary predication.
As mentioned above, SR may be observed in utterances, which is impossible when we deal with PR. Therefore, PR are identified with ‘language’ while SR are identified with ‘speech’.