
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1 Nonideal plasma. Basic concepts
- •1.1 Interparticle interactions. Criteria of nonideality
- •1.1.1 Interparticle interactions
- •1.1.2 Coulomb interaction. Nonideality parameter
- •1.1.4 Compound particles in plasma
- •1.2.2 Metal plasma
- •1.2.3 Plasma of hydrogen and inert gases
- •1.2.4 Plasma with multiply charged ions
- •1.2.5 Dusty plasmas
- •1.2.6 Nonneutral plasmas
- •References
- •2.1 Plasma heating in furnaces
- •2.1.1 Measurement of electrical conductivity and thermoelectromotive force
- •2.1.2 Optical absorption measurements.
- •2.1.3 Density measurements.
- •2.1.4 Sound velocity measurements
- •2.2 Isobaric Joule heating
- •2.2.1 Isobaric heating in a capillary
- •2.2.2 Exploding wire method
- •2.3 High–pressure electric discharges
- •References
- •3.1 The principles of dynamic generation and diagnostics of plasma
- •3.2 Dynamic compression of the cesium plasma
- •3.3 Compression of inert gases by powerful shock waves
- •3.4 Isentropic expansion of shock–compressed metals
- •3.5 Generation of superdense plasma in shock waves
- •References
- •4 Ionization equilibrium and thermodynamic properties of weakly ionized plasmas
- •4.1 Partly ionized plasma
- •4.2 Anomalous properties of a metal plasma
- •4.2.1 Physical properties of metal plasma
- •4.2.2 Lowering of the ionization potential
- •4.2.3 Charged clusters
- •4.2.4 Thermodynamics of multiparticle clusters
- •4.3 Lowering of ionization potential and cluster ions in weakly nonideal plasmas
- •4.3.1 Interaction between charged particles and neutrals
- •4.3.2 Molecular and cluster ions
- •4.3.3 Ionization equilibrium in alkali metal plasma
- •4.4 Droplet model of nonideal plasma of metal vapors. Anomalously high electrical conductivity
- •4.4.1 Droplet model of nonideal plasma
- •4.4.2 Ionization equilibrium
- •4.4.3 Calculation of the plasma composition
- •4.5 Metallization of plasma
- •4.5.3 Phase transition in metals
- •References
- •5.1.1 Monte Carlo method
- •5.1.2 Results of calculation
- •5.1.4 Wigner crystallization
- •5.1.5 Integral equations
- •5.1.6 Polarization of compensating background
- •5.1.7 Charge density waves
- •5.1.8 Sum rules
- •5.1.9 Asymptotic expressions
- •5.1.10 OCP ion mixture
- •5.2 Multicomponent plasma. Results of the perturbation theory
- •5.3 Pseudopotential models. Monte Carlo calculations
- •5.3.1 Choice of pseudopotential
- •5.5 Quasiclassical approximation
- •5.6 Density functional method
- •5.7 Quantum Monte Carlo method
- •5.8 Comparison with experiments
- •5.9 On phase transitions in nonideal plasmas
- •References
- •6.1 Electrical conductivity of ideal partially ionized plasma
- •6.1.1 Electrical conductivity of weakly ionized plasma
- •6.2 Electrical conductivity of weakly nonideal plasma
- •6.3 Electrical conductivity of nonideal weakly ionized plasma
- •6.3.1 The density of electron states
- •6.3.2 Electron mobility and electrical conductivity
- •References
- •7 Electrical conductivity of fully ionized plasma
- •7.1 Kinetic equations and the results of asymptotic theories
- •7.2 Electrical conductivity measurement results
- •References
- •8 The optical properties of dense plasma
- •8.1 Optical properties
- •8.2 Basic radiation processes in rarefied atomic plasma
- •8.5 The principle of spectroscopic stability
- •8.6 Continuous spectra of strongly nonideal plasma
- •References
- •9 Metallization of nonideal plasmas
- •9.1 Multiple shock wave compression of condensed dielectrics
- •9.1.1 Planar geometry
- •9.1.2 Cylindrical geometry
- •9.3 Metallization of dielectrics
- •9.3.1 Hydrogen
- •9.3.2 Inert gases
- •9.3.3 Oxygen
- •9.3.4 Sulfur
- •9.3.5 Fullerene
- •9.3.6 Water
- •9.3.7 Dielectrization of metals
- •9.4 Ionization by pressure
- •References
- •10 Nonneutral plasmas
- •10.1.1 Electrons on a surface of liquid He
- •10.1.2 Penning trap
- •10.1.3 Linear Paul trap
- •10.1.4 Storage ring
- •10.2 Strong coupling and Wigner crystallization
- •10.3 Melting of mesoscopic crystals
- •10.4 Coulomb clusters
- •References
- •11 Dusty plasmas
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Elementary processes in dusty plasmas
- •11.2.1 Charging of dust particles in plasmas (theory)
- •11.2.2 Electrostatic potential around a dust particle
- •11.2.3 Main forces acting on dust particles in plasmas
- •11.2.4 Interaction between dust particles in plasmas
- •11.2.5 Experimental determination of the interaction potential
- •11.2.6 Formation and growth of dust particles
- •11.3 Strongly coupled dusty plasmas and phase transitions
- •11.3.1 Theoretical approaches
- •11.3.2 Experimental investigation of phase transitions in dusty plasmas
- •11.3.3 Dust clusters in plasmas
- •11.4 Oscillations, waves, and instabilities in dusty plasmas
- •11.4.1 Oscillations of individual particles in a sheath region of gas discharges
- •11.4.2 Linear waves and instabilities in weakly coupled dusty plasmas
- •11.4.3 Waves in strongly coupled dusty plasmas
- •11.4.4 Experimental investigation of wave phenomena in dusty plasmas
- •11.5 New directions in experimental research
- •11.5.1 Investigations of dusty plasmas under microgravity conditions
- •11.5.2 External perturbations
- •11.5.3 Dusty plasma of strongly asymmetric particles
- •11.5.4 Dusty plasma at cryogenic temperatures
- •11.5.5 Possible applications of dusty plasmas
- •11.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •Index
OSCILLATIONS, WAVES, AND INSTABILITIES IN DUSTY PLASMAS 461
In the works of Klindworth et al. (2000) and Ishihara et al. (2002), the rotation of dust clusters around their symmetry axis was e ected. In the first of the cited works, the cluster rotation was caused by the light pressure of the laser beam; not only could the cluster rotate as a whole, but also intershell rotation could be excited. In the second work, the cluster rotation was initiated by the presence of the magnetic field parallel to the cluster axis of symmetry. The magnetic field distorts the ion trajectories, with the result that the collisions of ions with the dust particles cause the cluster rotation.
In the work of Melzer et al. (2001), the oscillations of particles in clusters consisting of three, four, and seven particles were investigated. The application of the results obtained to dusty plasma diagnostics was also discussed (determination of the particle charge and plasma screening length). In this context we also mention the work of Amiranashvili et al. (2001) in which the stability conditions and analytical expressions for the frequencies of the basic modes were found for the simplest clusters consisting of two, three, and four particles and an arbitrary form of interaction potential between them.
11.4Oscillations, waves, and instabilities in dusty plasmas
In this section, the wave processes in dusty plasmas are described. In selecting the material, priority was given to phenomena for which both theoretical and experimental results exist and those used for dusty plasma diagnostics in the laboratory. Our main attention is concentrated on linear waves in dusty plasmas without magnetic fields, although there also exists an extensive literature on nonlinear waves and waves in the presence of magnetic fields. We focus on the e ects which are directly associated with the presence of the dust component. Often they have no analogs in the usual multicomponent plasmas. We start with the problem of individual particle oscillations in sheaths of gas discharges. Then an introduction to the theory of linear waves in dusty plasmas is given and some mechanisms of their instability and damping are considered. Finally, some experimental results are discussed, including generation of waves as a tool for dusty plasma diagnostics.
11.4.1Oscillations of individual particles in a sheath region of gas discharges
In most of the ground–based experiments, negatively charged dust particles can only levitate in regions of su ciently strong electric fields, where the electric force compensates for gravity. This occurs, for example, in the sheath of an r.f. discharge, where the electric field averaged over the oscillation period is directed along the gravity force; due to the large mass, neither the dust particles nor the ions respond to the r.f. field (f 14 MHz). This is also true in regard to the cathode sheath of a d.c. discharge. The electric field in these regions increases almost linearly towards the electrode (Tomme et al. 2000) and reaches su ciently high values on its surface. Variations in the particle charge are connected to ion acceleration under the action of the electric field and to an increase in the ratio ni/ne > 1 as the electrode is approached (see Fig. 11.3). Usually, the charge first
462 |
DUSTY PLASMAS |
somewhat decreases (increases in the absolute magnitude), reaches a minimum, and then increases and can even reach positive values close to the electrode. Examples of numerical calculations of the dependence of the particle surface potential on the distance from the electrode in collisionless and collisional sheaths of r.f. and d.c. discharges can be found in (Nitter 1996) for a set of plasma parameters. For not too heavy particles, there usually exists a stable particle equilibrium position in the sheath. Let us assign the vertical coordinate z = 0 to this position. The force balance condition gives
mdg + Zd0E0 = 0, |
(11.79) |
where Zd0 = Zd(0) and E0 = E(0). For small displacements of a particle around its equilibrium position (linear oscillations), the potential energy can be expressed in the form W (z) ≈ mdΩ2vz2/2, where
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ωv = − |
∂ Zd(z)E(z) |
|
(11.80) |
||
∂z |
|
md |
z=0 |
characterizes the frequency of vertical oscillations. As follows from relationship (11.80), Ωv depends on the derivative of the electrostatic force at the equilibrium position and on the particle mass. Due to the relatively large mass of the dust particles, the value of Ωv is not very high and typically lies in the range 1–100 s−1. Hence, it is convenient to use low–frequency excitations for determining the resonance frequency of vertical oscillations of particles, which can be expressed through the plasma and particle parameters.
As a simple example we refer to a harmonic excitation of particle oscillations. The equation for small amplitude oscillations is written as
z¨ + νdnz˙ + Ωv2 z = |
Fex(t) |
, |
(11.81) |
|
|||
|
md |
|
where Fex = f0 cos ωt, and f0 is the amplitude of an external force. Equation (11.81) constitutes an equation of forced oscillations in the presence of friction (see, e.g., Landau and Lifshitz 1988). Its solution for stationary oscillations has the form z(t) = A(ω) cos (ωt + δ), where A(ω) is the amplitude of forced oscillations, viz.
A(ω) = |
|
|
|
|
f0 |
|
|
, |
|
|
(11.82) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
md |
|
|
(Ωv2 − ω2)2 + νdn2 ω2 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
δ is the phase shift, and tan δ = |
ν |
|
|
ω/(ω2 |
Ω2 ). The amplitude grows when |
||||||
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
dn |
v |
2 |
2 |
/2) |
1/2 |
. The value |
||
ω approaches Ωv and reaches the maximum at ω = (Ωv |
− νdn |
|
of ω corresponding to the maximum of the amplitude for νdn Ωv is di erent from Ωv only by a second–order correction. Hence, changing ω and measuring the oscillation amplitude (11.82), it is possible to determine Ωv and νdn. Such measurements were performed for the first time by Melzer et al. (1994) and were later used to determine the particle charge by Trottenberg et al. (1995); Zuzic

OSCILLATIONS, WAVES, AND INSTABILITIES IN DUSTY PLASMAS 463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 11.16. The dependence of the amplitude of vertical oscillations of a dust particle in the sheath of an r.f. discharge on the excitation frequency (Homann et al. 1999). Symbols correspond to experimental findings, and curves to theoretical results. Di erent excitation methods were used: electrode excitation with sine wave ( ), electrode excitations with rectangular wave (•), excitation with radiation pressure from a chopped laser beam, analogous to rectangular wave ( ). All the methods yield the same resonant frequency of 17 Hz, from the value of which the particle charge can be estimated.
et al. (1996); Homann et al. (1999); Piel and Melzer (2002); and Piel (2003). Excitation is caused either by applying an additional low–frequency signal to the electrode (in a modified variant, to a small probe inserted in a plasma in the vicinity of the levitated particle) or by a ecting the particle with the aid of laser radiation (Zuzic et al. 1996). The exciting force is not necessarily harmonic, but this does not influence the essential properties of the oscillations. Typical experimental findings are presented in Fig. 11.16.
The main di culty in estimating the particle charge from experimental results is to establish the connection between Ωv and Zd. It is often supposed that the dependence of the particle charge on the vertical coordinate is much weaker than that of the electric field, i.e., in the first approximation it is believed that Zd ≈ Zd0 = const., and therefore Ω2v ≈ −Zd0E(0)/md. The value of the derivative E is often practically constant over the sheath and is linked through the Poisson equation with the electron and ion number densities:
E (z) = 4πe+ni(z) − ne(z),.
464 |
DUSTY PLASMAS |
The concentrations ni and ne are determined by extrapolating the results of probe measurements in the bulk plasma into the sheath region, using di erent theoretical models. Probe measurements in the sheath are not practical because of di culties in their interpretation. Therefore, the described method is not very accurate. However, it is widely used in experiments because of its simplicity and the absence of other methods exhibiting essentially higher accuracy.
By increasing the amplitude of the excitation force it is possible to excite nonlinear oscillations. The experiments and their theoretical interpretation are described by Ivlev et al. (2000b) and Zafiu et al. (2001). An example of a numerical model, which takes into account the dependencies of particle charge, electric field, and external force amplitude on the vertical coordinate, as well as the location of an excitation source with respect to the dust particle and force balance in the sheath, is given by Wang et al. (2002). The characteristic property of nonlinear oscillations is the hysteretic dependence of their amplitude on the excitation frequency. We also note that excitation of nonlinear oscillations allows us, in principle, to investigate the electric field and/or dust particle charge distributions along the sheath.
Vertical oscillations of particles in the sheath regions of gas discharges can be caused not only by the application of an external force, but also can be self– excited due to e ects specific to dusty plasmas. For example, a drastic increase in the amplitude of vertical oscillations was examined experimentally under certain conditions (e.g., with lowering pressure) in the sheath of r.f. and d.c. discharges (Nunomura et al. 1999; Samarian et al. 2001). Di erent theoretical aspects of vertical oscillations were considered by Vaulina et al. (1999a,b); Ivlev et al. (2000a); and Sorasio et al. (2002). Below, we will ignore the simplest e ect associated with the particle Brownian motion which is caused by the stochastic character of particle collisions with neutral atoms. This e ect is always present and is additive to other e ects. Its value (oscillation amplitude) is typically quite small from a practical point of view.
One of the e ects leading to vertical oscillations is associated with random particle charge variations caused by the stochastic nature of particle charging (Vaulina et al. 1999a,b, 2000). To describe this e ect, the right–hand side of Eq. (11.81) should be presented in the form Fex = eE0δZd, where δZd is the random deviation of the particle charge from its average value, which is a random function of time. The oscillation amplitude will also be a random function of time. However, using the properties of random charge fluctuations (11.32)–(11.35), it is possible to derive its root–mean–square value. It can be easily shown that for typical conditions Ωch Ωv νdn, the mean square amplitude of oscillations associated with the random charge variations can be estimated as
∆z2 ≈ |
|
|
|
g2γ2 |
|
|
, |
(11.83) |
||
|
Z |
d| |
Ω |
ch |
Ω2 |
ν |
|
|||
| |
|
|
v |
|
dn |
|
and increases with decreasing neutral gas pressure. Notice also that since Ωch a, νdn a−1, |Zd| a, and in a first approximation Ωv |Zd|/md a−2, we
OSCILLATIONS, WAVES, AND INSTABILITIES IN DUSTY PLASMAS 465
have ∆z2 a3, i.e., the mean square oscillation amplitude is proportional to the particle mass.
Another e ect, which is also associated with the variability of the particle charge, results from the finite charging time. The qualitative theory of this e ect was proposed to describe the following experimental evidence by Nunomura et al. (1999). When decreasing the neutral pressure and/or plasma density below some critical value (for the pressure p, the corresponding value is 3 mtorr), self– excitation of oscillations (their amplitude grows with time) of the dust particles levitating in the sheath region of a d.c. discharge occurs. The time scale of the amplitude growth is 10 s. In the final state either saturation takes place (the amplitude reaches a constant value determined, e.g., by nonlinear e ects) or, if the amplitude is too large, the particle leaves the plasma reaching the electrode surface. This behavior testifies to the existence of an instability mechanism for vertical oscillations, which is e ective under low neutral gas pressures. A physical interpretation of the phenomenon was proposed by Nunomura et al. (1999). According to the authors, due to the finite charging time, the charge of the oscillating particle experiences some delay with respect to its “equilibrium” value Zd(eq)(z) corresponding to infinitely slow particle motion. The particle motion is not merely potential in this case. If in the equilibrium position Zd(0) < 0, then for a particle moving along the electric field (downwards) the absolute value of the charge |Zd(z)| is smaller than the equilibrium value |Zd(eq)(z)|. When the particle is moving in the opposite direction (upwards), the inverse inequality is satisfied. Thus, over the oscillation period the particle acquires energy from the electric field. The oscillations become unstable when the energy gain is higher than the energy dissipation due to friction.
Quantitative interpretation of this mechanism was formulated by Ivlev et al. (2000a). The right–hand side of Eq. (11.83) can be written in the considered case as Fex = eE0δZd, where δZd = Zd(z, t) − Zd(eq)(z), with the equilibrium value Zd(eq)(z) = Zd0 + zZd(0). The dynamics of charging is given by Eq. (11.27) which in this case takes the form
∂δZd |
+ z˙ |
∂Zd |
= −ΩchδZd. |
(11.84) |
∂t |
∂z |
Assuming harmonic oscillations, namely z, δZd exp(−iωt), we get from Eq. (11.81), with the help of Eq. (11.84), the following relationship
(ω |
ch − |
iω)(ω2 + iν |
ω |
− |
Ω2 ) = |
− |
iω |
eE0 |
Z |
(0). |
(11.85) |
|
|||||||||||
|
dn |
|
v |
|
md d |
|
|
When the conditions Ωch Ωv νdn are satisfied, we have for weakly unstable (weakly damped) oscillations, |Re ω| |Im ω|, the dependencies
Re ω |
≈ |
Ω |
, |
2 Im ω |
ν |
|
eE0 |
Z |
(0). |
(11.86) |
|
dn − mdΩch |
|||||||||||
|
v |
|
|
≈ − |
d |
|
|