Patterson, Bailey - Solid State Physics Introduction to theory
.pdf5.4 The de Haas–van Alphen effect (B) 275
We now consider the motions of the electrons in a magnetic field. For electrons in a magnetic field B, we can write (e > 0, see Sect. 6.1.2)
F = k = −e(v × B) , |
(5.20) |
||
and taking magnitudes |
|
|
|
dk = |
eB |
1 |
(5.21) |
|
v dt , |
where v1 is the component of velocity perpendicular to B and F.
It will take an electron the same length of time to complete a cycle of motion in real space as in k-space. Therefore, for the period of the orbit, we can write
T = |
2π = ∫ dt = |
|
∫ |
dk . |
(5.22) |
|
ωc |
eB |
|
v1 |
|
Since the force is perpendicular to the velocity of the electron, the constant magnetic field cannot change the energy of the electron. Therefore, in k-space, the electron must stay on the same constant energy surface. Only electrons near the Fermi surface will be important for most effects, so let us limit our discussion to these. That the motion must be along the Fermi surface follows not only from the fact that the motion must be at constant energy, but that dk is perpendicular to
|
1 |
|
|
v = |
|
k E(k) , |
(5.23) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
because kE(k) is perpendicular to constant-energy surfaces. Equation (5.23) is derived in Sect. 6.1.2. The orbit in k-space is confined to the intersection of the Fermi surface and a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field.
In order to consider the de Haas–van Alphen effect, we need to relate the energy of the electron to the area of its orbit in k-space. We do this by considering
two orbits in k-space, which differ in energy by the small amount |
E. |
||||
v = |
1 |
|
E |
, |
(5.24) |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
k |
|
where v is the component of electron velocity perpendicular to the energy surface. From Fig. 5.4, note
v1 = v sinθ = |
1 |
|
|
E |
sinθ = |
1 |
|
|
|
E |
|
= |
1 |
|
E |
. |
(5.25) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
k sinθ |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
k1 |
|
|||||
Therefore, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2π |
= |
|
|
∫ |
|
|
dk |
= |
2 |
|
1 ∫ |
k1 dk , |
|
|
(5.26) |
||||||||
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
ω |
|
eB |
|
|
|
eB |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
c |
|
|
|
E |
1 |
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 The de Haas–van Alphen effect (B) 277
tubes (with axis along the z-axis perpendicular to the cross-sectional area). Each tube has a different quantum number with corresponding energy
|
1 |
|
|
2k 2 |
|
ωc n + |
2 |
|
+ |
z |
. |
|
|||||
|
|
|
2m |
We think of these tubes existing only when the magnetic field along the z-axis is turned on. When it is turned on, the tubes furnish the only available states for the electrons. If the magnetic field is not too strong, this shifting of states onto the tube does not change the overall energy very much. We want to consider what happens as we increase the magnetic field. This increases the area of each tube of fixed n. It is convenient to think of each tube with only small extension in the kz direction, Ziman makes this clear [5.35, Fig. 140, 1st edn.]. For some value of B, the tube of fixed n will break away from that part of the Fermi surface (with maximum cross-sectional area, see comment after (5.31)). As the tube breaks away, it pulls the allowed states (and, hence, electrons) at the Fermi surface with it. This causes an increase in energy. This increase continues until the next tube approaches from below. The electrons with energy just above the Fermi energy then hop down to this new tube. This results in a decrease in energy. Thus, the energy undergoes oscillations as the magnetic field is increased. These oscillations in energy can be detected as an oscillation in the magnetic susceptibility, and this is the de Haas–van Alphen effect. The oscillations look somewhat as sketched in Fig. 5.5. Such oscillations have now been seen in many metals.
χ |
Magnetic susceptibility χ |
B |
Fig. 5.5. Sketch of de Haas-Van Alphen oscillations in Cu
One might still ask why the electrons hop down to the lower tube. That is, why do states become available on the lower tube? The states become available because the number of states on each tube increases with the increase in magnetic field (the density of states per unit area is eB/h, see Sect. 12.7.3). This fact also explains why the total number of states inside the Fermi surface is conserved (on average) even though tubes containing states keep moving out of the Fermi surface with increasing magnetic field.
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 Peierls Instability of Linear Metals (B) |
279 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 5.6. Sketch of eutectic for Au1–xSix Adapted from Kittel and Kroemer (op. cit.)
5.6 Peierls Instability of Linear Metals (B)
The Peierls transition [75 pp 108-112, 23 p 203] is an example of a broken symmetry (see Sect. 7.2.6) in which the ground state has a lower symmetry than the Hamiltonian. It is a sort of metal–insulator phase transition that happens because a bandgap can occur at the Fermi surface, which results in an overall lowering of energy. One thinks of there being displacements in the regular array of lattice ions, induced by a strong electron–phonon interaction, that decreases the electronic energy without a larger increase in lattice elastic energy. The charge density then is nonuniform but has a periodic spatial variation.
We will only consider one dimension in this section. However, Peierls transitions have been discovered in (very special kinds of) real three-dimensional solids with weakly coupled molecular chains.
As Fig. 5.7 shows, a linear metal (in which the nearly free-electron model is appropriate) could lower its total electron energy by spontaneously distorting, that is reducing its symmetry, with a wave vector equal to twice the Fermi wave vector. From Fig. 5.7 we see that the states that increase in energy are empty, while those that decrease in energy are full. This implies an additional periodicity due to the distortion of
p = |
2π |
= |
π |
, |
2kF |
|
|||
|
|
kF |
or a corresponding reciprocal lattice vector of 2pπ = 2kF .
5.7 Heavy Fermion Systems (A) 283
The charge density assumes the form
ρ(r) = ρ0 (r)[1+ p cos(k r + φ)] , |
(5.46) |
where φ is the phase, and the length of the CDW determined by k is, in general, not commensurate with the lattice. k is given by 2kF where kF is the Fermi wave vector. CDWs can be detected as satellites to Bragg peaks in X-ray diffraction. See, e.g., Overhauser [5.21]. See also Thorne [5.31].
CDW’s have a long history. Peierls considered related mechanisms in the 1930s. Frolich and Peierls discussed CDWs in the 1950s. Bardeen and Frolich actually considered them as a model for superconductivity. It is true that some CDW systems show collective transport by sliding in an electric field but the transport is damped. It also turns out that the total electron conduction charge density is involved in the conduction.
It is well to point out that CDWs have three properties (see, e.g., Thorne op cit)
a.An instability associated with the Fermi surface caused by electron–phonon and electron–electron interactions.
b.An opening of an energy gap at the Fermi surface.
c.The wavelength of the CDW is π/kF.
5.6.2 Spin Density Waves (A)
Spin density waves (SDW) are much less common than CDW. One thinks here of a “spin Peierls” transition. SDWs have been found in chromium. The charge density of a SDW with up (↑ or +) and down (↓ or −) spins looks like
ρ± (r) = |
1 |
ρ0 (r)[1± p cos(k r +φ)]. |
(5.47) |
|
2 |
||||
|
|
|
So, there is no change in charge density [ρ+ + ρ− = ρ0(r)] except for that due to lattice periodicity. The spin density, however, looks like
ρS (r) = εˆρ0 (r) cos(k r +φ) , |
(5.48) |
where εˆ defines the quantization axis for spin. In general, the SDW is not commensurate with the lattice. SDWs can be observed by magnetic satellites in neutron diffraction. See, e.g., Overhauser [5.21]. Overhauser first discussed the possibility of SDWs in 1962. See also Harrison [5.10].
5.7 Heavy Fermion Systems (A)
This has opened a new branch of metal physics. Certain materials exhibit huge (~ 1000me) electron effective masses at very low temperatures. Examples are