Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
46
Добавлен:
17.08.2013
Размер:
296.13 Кб
Скачать

Genomics: The Science and Technology Behind the Human Genome Project.

Charles R. Cantor, Cassandra L. Smith

 

Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

ISBNs: 0-471-59908-5 (Hardback); 0-471-22056-6 (Electronic)

4 Polymerase Chain Reaction

and Other Methods for In Vitro

DNA Amplification

WHY AMPLIFY DNA?

The importance of DNA signal amplification for sensitive detection of DNA through hybridization was discussed in the previous chapter. Beyond mere sensitivity, there are two

basic reasons why direct amplification

of

DNA is

a

vital part

of

DNA

analysis. First,

DNA amplification provides a route

to

an

essentially

limitless supply

of

material. When

amplification is used this way, as

a

bulk

preparative

procedure,

the

major requirement is

that the sample be uniformly amplified so that it is not altered, distorted, or mutated by the process of amplification. Only if these constraints can be met, can we think of amplification as a true immortalization of the DNA.

The second rationale behind DNA amplification is that selective amplification of a region of a genome, chromosome, or sample provides a relatively easy way to purify that segment from the bulk. Indeed, if the amplification is sufficient in magnitude, the DNA product becomes such an overwhelming component of the amplification mixture that the starting material is reduced to a trivial contaminant for most applications.

Amplification can be

carried out in vivo by growing living cells (Box 1.2) or

in

vitro

by using enzymes. There are

several overwhelming advantages of in vitro amplification.

 

 

Any possible toxic effects

of a DNA target on the host cell are eliminated. There

is

no

need to purify the amplified material away from the host genome or the vector used for

 

cloning. Base analogues

can

be used that would frequently be unacceptable to a living

cell system. Samples can

be

manipulated by automated methods that are far easier to im-

 

plement in vitro than in vivo. The major limitation of existing in vitro amplification meth-

ods until recently is that

they

were restricted to relatively short stretches of DNA, typi-

cally

less than 5

kb.

New

long polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures have

extended the range of in

vitro amplification up to about 20 kb. For longer targets than

this,

in vivo cloning methods must still be used.

BASIC PRINCIPLES

OF

THE

POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR)

What makes PCR a tool of immense power and flexibility is the requirement of DNA polymerases for pre-existing DNA primers. Thus DNA polymerases cannot start DNA

chains de novo; a primer can be used to determine where, along a DNA template, the synthesis of the complement of that stand begins. It is this primer requirement that allows the selective amplification of any DNA region by using appropriate, specific DNA primers.

98

 

 

 

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR)

99

Once started, a DNA polymerase like

 

 

 

 

E. coli

 

DNA

polymerase I

(pol I) will proceed in

 

the 3 - to 5

-direction until it has

copied all the

way

to

the

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

-end of the template. The

simplest amplification scheme for in vivo DNA amplification is successive

cycles

of

 

 

priming, chain extension, and product denaturation, shown schematically in Figure 4.1. If

 

 

these steps are carried out efficiently, the result is a linear increase in the amount of prod-

 

uct strand with increasing cycles of amplification. This scheme, called

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

linear

amplifica-

tion,

is very useful in preparing DNA samples for DNA sequencing. Here chain terminat-

 

 

ing analogues of dpppN’s are added

in trace amounts to produce

a

distribution

of

 

products with different chain lengths (see Chapter 10). When linear amplification is used

 

in this context, it is called

 

cycle sequencing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A step up in complexity from linear amplification

is

the

use

of

two

 

antiparallel

 

primers, as shown in Figure 4.2

 

 

a . These primers define

the region to be amplified, since

 

after the first few cycles of DNA synthesis, the relative amount of longer DNA sequences

 

 

that contain the region spanned by the primer becomes insignificant. The target DNA is

 

 

denatured, and two antiparallel primers are added. These must be in sufficient excess over

 

 

target that renaturation of the original

duplex is improbable, and essentially

all

products

 

are primers annealed to single-stranded templates. The

 

first

cycle

of

DNA

synthesis

 

 

copies both of the original template

strands. Hence it doubles the

number

of

targets

 

present in the starting reaction mixture. Each successive round of

DNA

denaturation,

 

primer binding, and chain extension will, in principle, produce a further doubling of the

 

 

number of target molecules. Hence the amount of amplified product grows exponentially,

 

 

 

as 2 n , where

n

is the

number of

amplification cycles. This is the basic

design

of a

typical

 

PCR procedure. Note that only the DNA sequence flanked by the two primers is

ampli-

 

 

fied (Fig. 4.2).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Early PCR protocols employed ordinary DNA polymerases such as the Klenow frag-

 

 

ment of

E.

coli

DNA

polymerase

I

(a

truncated

version

of

the

natural

protein

with its

 

5 -exonuclease

activity removed). The difficulty

with this

approach

is

that

these

enzymes

 

 

Figure 4.1 Linear amplification of DNA by cycles of repeated in vitro synthesis and melting.

Figure 4.2

Exponential amplification of DNA in vitro by the use of two antiparallel primers.

(a)

Polymerase chain

reaction (PCR) with successive cycles of DNA synthesis and melting.

(B) Only

the DNA flanked by the primers is amplified.

 

100

 

 

 

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR)

101

are easily denatured by the high temperatures needed

to separate the two strands

of

du-

 

 

plex DNA. Unlike DNA, however, proteins like DNA polymerases, once denatured, are

 

 

 

generally reluctant to renature. Thus, with each cycle of amplification, it was necessary to

 

 

add fresh polymerase for efficient performance. This problem was relieved when DNA

 

 

 

polymerases from thermophilic organisms became available. The most widely

used

of

 

 

 

these enzymes in PCR is from

Thermis acquaticus,

the

Taq

polymerase. This enzyme has

an optimal temperature for polymerization in the range of 70 to 75°C. It extends DNA

 

chains at a rate of about 2 kb per minute. Most important, it is fairly resistant to the con-

 

tinual cycles of heating and cooling required for PCR. The half-life for thermal denatura-

 

 

tion of

Taq

polymerase is 1.6 h at 95°C, but it is less than 6 minutes at 100°C. When very

 

high denaturation temperatures are needed,

as in the PCR amplification of very

G

 

C

rich DNA,

it is sometimes useful to employ

even more thermal-stable polymerases such

 

 

 

as enzymes isolated from organisms that

grow in the superheated water (temperature

 

 

above 100°C) near geothermal vents. Such enzymes are called

 

 

 

vent

polymerases.

Examples are the enzyme from

Thermococcus litoralis

 

 

with a half-life of 1.8 h at 100°C

and the enzyme from

Pyrococcus furiosis

 

with a half-life of 8 h at 100°C. However, these

enzymes are not as processive as

 

Taq

polymerase. This means that they tend to fall off

 

their template more readily, which makes it more difficult to amplify long templates.

 

 

 

 

With

Taq

 

polymerase typical PCR cycle parameters are

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DNA denaturation

 

92–96°C for 30 to 60 seconds

 

 

 

 

 

Primer annealing

 

 

55–60°C for 30 seconds

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chain extension

 

 

72°C for 60 seconds

 

 

 

The number of cycles used depends on the particular situation and sample concentrations,

 

 

 

but typical values when PCR is efficient are 25 to 30 cycles. Thus the whole process takes

 

 

about an hour. Typical sample and reagent concentrations used are

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Target

10 15 mol, or down to as little as 1 mol

 

 

 

 

Primer

2

10 11 mol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dpppN’s

2

10 8 mol of each

 

 

 

 

 

These concentrations imply that the reaction will eventually saturate once the primer and

 

 

dpppN’s are depleted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are a few peculiarities of the

Taq

polymerase that must be taken into

considera-

 

tion in

designing PCR

procedures

or experimental protocols based

on

PCR.

Taq

poly-

merase has no 3

-proofreading exonuclease activity. Thus it can, and does, misincorporate

 

 

bases. We will say more

about this

later.

 

Taq

polymerase does have a 5

-exonuclease ac-

 

tivity. Thus it will nick translate, which is sometimes undesirable. However, mutants exist

 

 

that remove this activity, and they can be used if necessary. The most serious problem

 

 

generally

encountered is

that

Taq

polymerase

can

add

an extra nontemplate-coded A

to

 

the 3 -end of DNA chains, as shown in Figure 4.3

 

 

 

a . It can also, perhaps using a related

 

activity, make primer dimers, which may or may not contain additional uncoded residues

 

 

as shown in Figure 4.3

 

b. This is a serious problem because once such dimeric primers are

 

 

created, they are efficient substrates for further amplification. These primer dimers are a

 

 

major source of artifacts in PCR. However, they are usually short and can be removed by

 

 

gel filtration or other sizing methods to prevent their interference with subsequent uses of

 

 

the PCR reaction product.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

METHODS FOR IN VITRO DNA AMPLIFICATION

Figure 4.3

Artifacts

introduced

by the use of

Taq DNA polymerase.

(a)

Nontemplated terminal

adenylation;

(b)primer dimer formation.

The efficiency of typical PCR reactions can be impressive. Let us

consider a typical

case where one chooses to amplify a short, specific region of human DNA. This sort of

procedure would be useful, for example, in examining a particular region of the genome

for differences among individuals, without having to clone the region from each person to

be tested. To define this

region, one needs to know the DNA sequence that flanks it, but

one does not need know anything about the DNA sequence between primers. For unique,

efficient priming, convergent primers about 20 bp long are used on each

side of the re-

gion. A typical amplification would start with 1

g of total human genomic DNA. Using

Avogadro’s number, 6

1023, the genome size of 3

109 bp, and the 660 Da molecular

weight of a single base pair, we can calculate that this sample contains

 

 

10 6 6 1023

 

3 105

copies

 

 

3 109 6.6 102

 

 

 

 

of the genome or 3

105 molecules of any single-copy genomic DNA fragments contain-

ing our specific target sequence. If PCR were 100% efficient, and 25 cycles of amplifica-

tion were carried out, we would expect

to multiply the number of target

molecules by

225 6.4 107. Thus, after the amplification, the number of targets should be

6.4

107 3 105 2

1013 molecules

If the product of the DNA amplification is 200 bp, it will weigh

 

200 bp

 

(6.6 102 Da / bp)

(2 1013)

6 1023 g / Da

 

 

4

g

If such efficient amplification could be achieved, the results would be truly impressive. This means that one would be sampling just a tiny fraction of the genome, and in a scant hour of amplification, the yield of this fraction would be such as to amount to 80% of the total DNA in the sample. Thus one would be able to purify any DNA sample.

In practice, the actual PCR

efficiencies typically achieved are not perfect, but they are

remarkably good. We can define the

efficiency,

 

E

, for n cycles of amplification by the ra-

tio of product,

P , to starting material,

S , as

 

 

 

 

P

(1 E

)n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S

 

Actual efficiencies turn out to be in the range of 0.6 to 0.9; this is impressive. Such high efficiencies immediately raise the notion of using PCR amplification as a quantitative tool

to measure not just the presence of a particular DNA sequence in a complex sample but to determine its amount. In practice, this can be done, but it is not always reliable; it usually requires coamplification with a standard sample, or competition with known amounts of a related sample.

NOISE IN PCR: CONTAMINATION

103

NOISE IN PCR: CONTAMINATION

As in any high-gain amplification system, any fluctuations in conditions are rapidly mag-

nified, especially

when

they

occur early in the reaction. There are many sources of noise

in PCR. One extremely common source is variations in the temperature at different posi-

tions in typical thermal cycling blocks. A typical apparatus for PCR uses arrays of tube

holders (or microtitre plate holders) that can be temperature controlled

by

heating

ele-

ments and a cooling bath, by thermoelectric heating and cooling, by forced convection, or

 

by switching among several pre-equilibrated water baths. A number of different funda-

mental designs for such thermal cyclers are now available,

and

the

serious practitioner

would be well advised to look carefully at the actual temperature characteristics of the

particular

apparatus used.

For extremely

finicky samples,

such

as

those

that

need

very

G C rich primers, it may be necessary to use the same sample well each time to provide

reproducible PCR. It is for reasons like this that PCR, while it has revolutionized the han-

dling of DNA in research laboratories, has not yet found broad acceptance in clinical di-

agnostic laboratories despite its potential power.

 

 

 

 

 

 

A major source of PCR noise appear to lie with characteristics of the samples them-

selves. The

worst

problem

is undoubtedly sample contamination. If the same sample is

 

used repetitively in PCR assays, the most likely source of contamination is the PCR reac-

tion product from a previous assay. With PCR we are dealing with a system that amplifies

a DNA sequence by 10

7 fold. Thus, even if there is one part per million in carry over con-

tamination; it will completely dominate the next round of PCR. A second major source of

contamination is DNA from organisms in dust or from DNA shed by the experimenter, in

 

the form of dander, hair follicles, sweat, or saliva. This problem is obviously of greatest

significance when the samples to be amplified contain human sequences.

 

 

 

 

The basic cure for most contamination is to carry out PCR under typical biological

containment

procedures

and

use good sterile technique including plugged pipetmen tips,

to prevent contamination by aerosols, and laminar flow hoods, to minimize the ability of

the investigator to inadvertently contaminate the sample. However, these approaches are

not always sufficient to deal with the contamination caused by previous PCR experiments

 

on similar samples. This situation is extremely frustrating because it is not uncommon for

neophytes to have success with procedures that then progressively deteriorate as they gain

more experience,

since

the overall level

and dispersal of

contaminant in

the

laboratory

keeps rising. There are general solutions to this problem, but they have not yet seen widespread adoption. One helpful procedure is to UV irradiate all of the components of a PCR reaction before adding the target. This will kill double-stranded DNA contaminants in the polymerase and other reagents. A more general solution is to exploit the properties of the enzyme, Uracil DNA glycosylase (DUG), which we described in Chapter 1. This enzyme

degrades DNA at each incorporated dU. Normally these

incorporations are rare muta-

genic events, and the lesion introduced into the DNA is rapidly repaired.

DUG is used in PCR by carrying out the initial PCR amplification using dpppU instead of

dpppT. The amplification product can be characterized in the

normal

way; the properties of

DNA with T fully substituted by dU are not that abnormal except for

a lower melting temper-

ature and inability to be recognized by many restriction nucleases. Next, when a subsequent PCR reaction needs to be done, the sample, including the target, is treated with DUG prior to thermal cycling. This will destroy any carryover from the previous PCR because there will be

so many dU’s removed that the resulting DNA will be incapable of replication. If the second

PCR is also performed with dpppU, its subsequent carryover can also

be prevented by a

DUG treatment, and this procedure can be repeated

ad libertum.

104 METHODS FOR IN VITRO DNA AMPLIFICATION

PCR

NOISE:

MISPRIMING

 

 

 

 

 

Typical PCR conditions with two convergent primers offer a number of

possible

unin-

tended primed amplifications. These are illustrated in Figure 4.4. If the primers are not

chosen wisely, one of the two primers may be able to act alone to amplify DNA as shown

in Figure

4.4

b. Alternatively, the two convergent primers may have more than one site in

the target that allows amplification. There is no way to plan for these events, unless the

entire sequence of the sample is known. However, the chances of such accidental, unin-

tended, but perfect priming can be minimized by using long enough primers so that the

probability of such a coincidental match in DNA sequence is very small.

 

 

 

A more serious and more common occurrence is mispriming by inexact pairing of the

primer with the template. Note that if the 3

 

-end

of the primer is mispaired with the tem-

plate, this is unlikely to lead to amplification, and thus there will be little harm. However, if

the 5 -end of the primer is mispaired, the impact is much more serious, as shown in Figure

4.4

c and

 

d . If primer annealing is carried out under insufficiently

stringent conditions, once

elongation is allowed to start, a 5

mispaired primer

may

still be able to lead to DNA syn-

thesis. In the next round of PCR the incorrect elongated product from

this synthesis will

serve as a template if it contains a sequence complementary to any of the primers in the so-

lution. However, when this synthesis extends past the original mispaired primer, the se-

quence that is made is now the precise complement of that primer. From this round on, no

stringency conditions will discriminate between the desired product and the misprinted arti-

fact. Thus more than one product will amplify efficiently in subsequent steps. The key is to

prevent the mispriming in the first place. If the

misprimed

sequence

is

nearly identical to

the

primed

sequence, the most obvious way to

solve this

problem is

to change

primers.

Figure 4.4

Effects of mispriming on

PCR reaction products.

(a) Desired product.

(b)Product

formed by an inverted repeat of one primer.

(c) Product formed by nonstringent annealing.

(d) After

the second round of DNA synthesis, the product in

(c)

is now a perfect match to the primer for sub-

 

sequent rounds of amplification.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PCR

NOISE: MISPRIMING

105

Hopefully, another sequence near by on the desired template will not have its near mate

 

 

somewhere else in the sample. However, there are more general cures for some mispriming

 

 

 

 

as shown below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In typical PCR reactions the denatured target and

all

of

the

other

components

are

 

 

mixed at room temperature, and then the cycles of amplification are allowed to start. This

 

 

 

has the risk that polymerase extensions of the primers may start before

the

reaction

is

 

 

heated to the optimal temperature for the elongation step. If this occurs, it enhances the

 

 

risk of mispriming, since room temperature is far from a stringent enough annealing tem-

 

 

 

perature for most primers. This problem can easily be avoided by what is called

 

 

 

hot

start

PCR.

Here the temperature is kept above the annealing temperature until all the compo-

 

 

nents, including the denatured target, have been added. This avoids most of the misprim-

 

 

 

ing during the first step; and it is always the first step in PCR that is most critical for the

 

subsequent production of undesired species.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A very powerful approach to favoring the amplification of desired products and elimi-

 

 

 

nating the amplification of undesired products is nested PCR. This can be done whenever

 

 

 

a sufficient length of known sequence is available at each end of the desired target. The

 

 

process is shown schematically in Figure 4.5. Two sets of primers are used; one is internal

 

 

 

to the other. Amplification is allowed to proceed for half the desired rounds using the ex-

 

 

 

ternal primers. Then the primers are switched to the internal primers, and amplification is

 

 

 

allowed to continue for the remaining rounds. The only products

that will be present at

 

 

 

high

concentration at the end of

the reaction are those that

can

be

amplified

by

both

sets

 

 

 

of primers. Any sequence that can inadvertently be amplified by

one

set

is most

unlikely

 

 

 

to be a target for the second set, since, in general, there is no relationship or overlap of the

 

 

sequences used as the two sets of primers. With nested priming it is possible to carry out

 

 

many more than 30 rounds of amplification with relatively little background noise. Hence

 

 

 

this procedure is to be especially recommended when very small

samples

are

used and

 

 

 

large numbers of amplifications are needed to produce desired amounts of product.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instead of full nesting, sometimes it is desirable or necessary

to

use

a

dual

set

of

 

primers on one side of the target but only a single set on the other. This is

called

 

 

hemi-

nesting,

and it is still much safer and generally yields much cleaner products than no nest-

 

 

ing at all. Particularly elegant versions of hemi-nesting have been demonstrated where the

 

 

 

two

nested primers can both be

introduced at the start of

the

PCR

at

a temperature

at

 

 

which only the external primer functions well. Halfway through the amplification cycles,

 

 

 

the annealing temperature is shifted so that now the internal primer becomes by far the fa-

 

 

 

vored one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4.5 The use of nested primers to increase the specificity of PCR amplification.

106

 

METHODS FOR IN VITRO DNA AMPLIFICATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MISINCORPORATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We mentioned earlier that

 

Taq

polymerase has no 3

 

editing exonuclease. Because of this

 

 

it has a relatively high rate of misincorporation when compared with many other DNA

 

 

 

 

 

 

polymerases. Thus the products of PCR reactions accumulate errors. The misincorpora-

 

 

 

 

 

 

tion

rate

of

Taq

polymerase has

been

estimated

as 1.7

 

 

10 4

to 5 10 6 per nucleotide

per cycle. The error rate depends quite a bit on the reaction conditions, especially on the

 

 

 

 

 

concentration of dpppN’s used, and on the sequence of the target. The impact of these mi-

 

 

 

 

 

spairing rates on the product are straightforward to calculate. At any site in the target, the

 

 

 

 

 

fraction of correct bases after n cycles of amplification will be

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X corr

(1 X mis

)n 1 nX

mis

 

 

 

 

 

where

 

X mis

is the fraction of misincorporation rate at that site for a single cycle. For 30 cy-

 

 

10 3 to

cles

the

fraction of misincorporated

bases

at any

site

will

be

30

 

 

X

mis

5.1

1.5

10 4 , using the numbers described above. Thus at any

site the correct sequence is

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

still overwhelmingly predominant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, if one asks, instead, for the amplification of a DNA of length,

 

 

 

 

L ,

how

many

incorrect bases will each DNA product molecule have after

 

 

 

 

n

steps, the number is

 

LnX mis .

With

 

L 1000,

this means that products

will have

from

0.15 to 5

incorrect

bases. How

 

 

 

 

serious a problem is this? It depends on the use to which the DNA will be put. As a hy-

 

 

 

 

 

bridization probe, these errors are likely to be invisible. If one sequences the DNA di-

 

 

 

 

 

rectly, the errors will still be invisible (except for the rare case where a misincorporation

 

 

 

 

 

occurred in the first round or two of the amplification and then was perpetuated). This is

 

 

 

 

 

 

because the errors are widely distributed at different sites on different molecules, and se-

 

 

 

 

 

quencing sees only the average occupant of each site. However, if the PCR

products

are

 

 

 

 

 

cloned, the impact of misincorporation is much more serious. Now, since each clone is the

 

 

 

 

 

 

immortalization of a single DNA molecule, it will contain whatever particular errors that mol-

 

 

 

 

 

 

ecule had. In general, it is a hazardous idea to clone PCR products and then sequence them.

 

 

 

 

 

The sequences will almost always have errors. Similarly PCR starting from single DNA mol-

 

 

 

 

 

 

ecules is fine for most analyses, but one cannot recommend it for sequencing because, once

 

 

 

 

 

 

again, the products are likely to show a significant level of misincorporation errors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG PCR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A number of factors may limit the ability of conventional PCR to amplify long DNA tar-

 

 

 

 

 

 

gets. These include depurination of DNAs at the high temperatures used for denaturation,

 

 

 

 

 

 

inhibition of the DNA polymerase by stable intramolecular secondary structure in nomi-

 

 

 

 

 

 

nally single-stranded templates, insufficient time for strand untwisting during convention-

 

 

 

 

 

 

ally used denaturation protocols, as described in Chapter 3, and short templates. The first

 

 

 

 

 

problem can be reduced by using increased pH’s to suppress purine protonation, a precur-

 

 

 

 

 

 

sor to depurination. The second problem can be helped somewhat by adding denaturants

 

 

 

 

 

 

like dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The third problem can be alleviated by using longer de-

 

 

 

 

 

naturation times. The last problem can be solved by

preparing DNA

in agarose (Chapter

 

 

 

 

 

 

5). However, the most serious obstacle to the successful PCR amplification of long DNA

 

 

 

 

 

 

targets rests in the properties of the most commonly used DNA polymerase, the

 

 

 

 

 

Taq

poly-

merase.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SINGLE-SIDED

PCR

107

Taq

polymerase

has

a

significant

rate of misincorporation as described above.

 

 

However, it lacks a 3

 

 

proofreading exonuclease activity. Once a base is misincorporated

 

 

at the 3 -end, the chances that the

extension

will

terminate

at

this

point

become

 

 

markedly enhanced. This premature chain termination ultimately leads to totally ineffec-

 

 

 

tive PCR amplification above DNA sizes of 5 to 10 kb. To circumvent the problem of pre-

 

 

 

mature chain termination, Wayne Barnes and coworkers have added trace amounts of a

 

 

 

 

second thermally stable DNA polymerase like

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pfu,

Vent, or Deep Vent that possesses a

 

3 -exonuclease activity. This repairs any

terminal mismatches

left

by

 

 

 

 

Taq

polymerase,

 

and then the latter can continue chain elongation. With such a two-enzyme procedure,

 

 

 

successful PCR amplification of DNA targets in the 20 kb to 40 kb range are now becom-

 

 

 

ing common.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCORPORATING

EXTRA FUNCTIONALITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PCR offers a simple and convenient way to enhance or embroider the properties of DNA

 

 

 

 

molecules. As shown in Figure 4.6, primers can be pre-labeled with radioisotopes, biotin,

 

 

 

or fluorescent dyes. Thus the ends of the amplified targets can be derivatized as an intrin-

 

 

 

sic part of the PCR reaction. This is extremely

convenient for many

applications. Since

 

 

 

two primers are chosen, two different labels or tags can be used. One frequent and every

 

 

 

effective strategy is to put a capture tag on one primer—like a biotin—and a detection tag

 

 

 

on the other—like a fluorophore. After the amplification, the product is captured and ana-

 

 

 

lyzed. Only double-stranded material that is the result of amplification that incorporated

 

 

 

both of the primers should be visible.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PCR can also be used to modify the DNA sequence at the ends of the target. For exam-

 

 

 

ple, as shown in Figure

4.6

 

b,

the

primer can overhang

the ends

of the desired target. As

 

 

successive amplification cycles are carried out, the DNA duplexes that accumulate will

 

 

 

contain the target sequence flanked by the additional segments of primer sequence. This

 

 

 

has a number of useful applications. It allows any restriction sites needed to be built into

 

 

 

the primer. Then, as shown in the figure,

after the PCR reaction the product can be

 

 

 

cleaved at these sites for subsequent ligation or cloning steps.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another use for overhanging primers

arises

in

circumstances

where

the original

 

 

 

amount of known sequence is too short or too imperfect to allow efficient amplification.

 

 

 

This problem arises, for example, when a primer is made to an imperfectly repeating se-

 

 

 

quence. The usual desire in such experiments is to amplify many different copies of the

 

 

 

repeat (e.g., to visualize human DNAs among

a background of rodent DNA in a hybrid

 

 

 

 

cell as illustrated in Chapter 14), but few of the repeats match the primer well enough to

 

 

 

really give good amplification. By having

an overhanging primer, after the first few

 

 

 

rounds of amplification, the complements to the primer sequence now contain the extra

 

 

 

overhang (Fig.

4.6

c ). The resulting template-primer complexes are much more stable and

 

 

amplify much more effectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SINGLE-SIDED PCR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A major limitation in conventional PCR is that known DNA sequence is needed on both

 

 

 

sides of the desired target. It is frequently the case, as shown in Figure 4.7

 

 

a , that a known

 

sequence

is

available

only

at

one place

within

the

desired

target,

or

at

one

end of

it.

 

 

Соседние файлы в папке genomics1-10