Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5441_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Preformulation Studies
- •1.2.1 Solubility
- •1.2.2 Partition Coefficient
- •1.3.2 Parenteral Dosage Forms
- •1.3.3 Oral Dosage Form
- •1.3.4 Transdermal Dosage Form
- •1.3.5 Inhalational Formulation
- •1.3.6 Nasal Formulations
- •1.3.7 Ophthalmic Dosage Form
- •1.4 Scale-Up Studies
- •1.4.1 Pilot Plant
- •1.4.2 Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)
- •1.2.4 Bulk Properties
- •1.3 Prototype Development
- •1.4.3 Regulatory Approval
- •1.5 Commercialisation
- •1.5.1.5 Life Cycle Extension Strategies
- •1.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.1.2 Product Specification
- •2.1.3.1 In-Process Specification
- •2.1.3.2 Release Specification
- •2.1.3.3 Shelf Life Specification
- •2.1.4 Specification Design
- •2.1.5 Specification Justification
- •2.2.3 ICH Q6A Guideline
- •2.2.3.1 Objective
- •2.2.3.2 New Drug Product
- •2.2.3.3 New Drug Substance
- •2.2.3.4 Universal Tests
- •2.2.3.5 Specific Tests
- •2.2.4 ICH Q6B Guideline
- •2.2.4.1 Scope
- •2.2.4.2 Specifications
- •2.2.5.1 Q8(R2): Structure—Parent Guideline (Knight 2014)
- •2.2.5.1.1 Pharmaceutical Development: Introduction
- •Drug Substances
- •Excipients
- •2.2.5.1.3 Drug Product
- •Formulation Development
- •Overages
- •2.2.5.1.4 Manufacturing Process Development
- •2.2.5.1.5 Container Closure System
- •2.2.5.1.6 Microbiological Attributes
- •2.2.5.1.7 Compatibility
- •2.2.5.2 Q8(R2): Structure—Annex
- •2.2.5.2.1 Introduction
- •Quality Target Product Profile
- •Critical Quality Attributes (CQA)
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Drug Substance-Related Information
- •2.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.3.1 Factorial Designs (FD)
- •3.3.2 Fractional Factorial Designs (FFDs)
- •3.3.3 Plackett–Burman Designs (PBDs)
- •3.3.4 Central Composite Designs (CCD)
- •3.3.5 Box–Behnken Designs (BBD)
- •3.3.6 Equiradial Designs
- •3.3.7 Mixture Designs
- •3.3.8 Taguchi Designs
- •3.3.9 Optimal Designs
- •3.4.1 Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)
- •3.4.2 Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
- •3.4.3 Risk Management
- •3.4.4 Design Space
- •3.4.5 Control Strategy
- •3.6.2 Constraint-Based Optimization
- •3.6.3 Multi-objective Optimization
- •3.6.4 Expert Systems
- •3.6.5 Evolutionary Algorithms
- •3.9.1 Design-Expert
- •3.9.2 SIMCA
- •3.9.3 Minitab
- •3.9.4 JMP
- •3.9.5 MATLAB
- •3.9.6 Aspen Plus
- •3.9.7 AutoCAD
- •3.10.1 Pharmaceutical Industry
- •3.10.2 Food Industry
- •3.10.3 Chemical Industry
- •3.10.4 Biotechnology Industry
- •3.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.3.1.1 Fillers/Diluents
- •4.3.1.2 Binders
- •4.3.2.2 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.3 Sweeteners
- •4.3.2.4 pH Adjusters
- •4.3.2.5 Preservatives
- •4.3.2.6 Surfactant
- •4.3.2.7 Suspending Agent
- •4.3.2.8 Emulsifying Agent
- •4.3.2.9 Colorants
- •4.3.2.10 Viscosity Modifiers
- •4.3.3.1 Penetration Enhancers
- •4.3.3.2 Solvents/Solubilisers
- •4.3.3.3 Adhesives
- •4.3.3.5 Plasticisers
- •4.3.4.1.1 Bulking Agents
- •4.3.4.1.2 Lyoprotectants
- •4.3.4.1.3 Antioxidants
- •4.3.4.1.4 Buffering Agents
- •4.3.4.2.1 Buffers
- •4.3.4.2.2 Preservatives
- •4.3.4.2.3 Tonicity Adjusters
- •4.3.4.2.4 Solvent System
- •4.3.4.2.5 Solubilisers
- •4.4.1 Physical Incompatibilities
- •4.4.2 Chemical Incompatibilities
- •4.3.1.3 Disintegrants
- •4.3.1.5 Coating Agents
- •4.3.1.8 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.1 Vehicles
- •4.4.3 Therapeutic or Physiological Incompatibilities
- •4.6 Related Regulatory Perspectives
- •4.6.1 GRAS
- •4.6.2 IIG
- •4.6.3 IPEC
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Binders
- •5.2.1.1 Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)
- •5.2.1.2 LYCATAB
- •5.2.1.3 GalenIQ (Isomalt)
- •5.2.2 Disintegrants
- •5.2.3 Lubricants
- •5.2.4 Co-processed Excipients
- •5.2.4.2 COMBILOSE
- •5.2.4.3 PEARLITOL CR-H
- •5.2.4.4 PROSOLV EASYtab SP (Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose)
- •5.3 New-Age Material Handling Techniques Developed
- •5.3.1 Automated Dispensing System
- •5.3.1.1 Unit Dose Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.2 Centralised Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.3 Robotic Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.2 Vacuum Conveying Systems
- •5.3.3 Flexible Screw Conveyors
- •5.4.1 Automation
- •5.4.2 Enhanced Safety
- •5.4.3 Higher Productivity
- •5.4.4 Enhanced Accuracy
- •5.4.5 Reduced Costs
- •5.6.1 Widely Used Databases
- •5.6.5.1 Tablets
- •5.6.5.2 Predicting Drug Release
- •5.6.5.4 Detecting Tablet Defects
- •5.6.5.5 Granules
- •5.7 Continuous Manufacturing Technology
- •5.7.1.1 Regulatory Uncertainties
- •5.7.1.2 Process Automation Technologies (PAT)
- •5.7.1.3 Equipment
- •5.7.1.5 Modern Process Control Techniques
- •5.8.1 Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
- •5.8.1.1 Process Variables
- •5.8.2 Applications
- •5.8.2.1 Stereolithography (SLA)
- •5.8.2.2 Printing Dosage Forms
- •5.8.3.1 Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)
- •5.8.3.3 Drawbacks
- •5.8.4.1 On-Demand Manufacturing
- •5.8.4.2 Improved Quality Dosage Forms
- •5.9 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Excipients
- •6.2.1 Superdisintegrants
- •6.2.3 Lubricants/Anti-adherents
- •6.2.4 Solubility/Dissolution Enhancers
- •6.2.5 Drug Release Rate Modifiers
- •6.2.6 Co-processed Excipients
- •6.3.1 Advanced Granulation Approaches
- •6.4 Process Automation
- •6.4.2 Fundamental Process Control Instruments
- •6.4.2.2 Rotary Tablet Press
- •6.5.1 Capping
- •6.5.2 Lamination
- •6.5.3 Chipping
- •6.5.4.1 Double Impression
- •6.6 Tablet Coating
- •6.6.1 Sugar Coating
- •6.6.2 Film Coating
- •6.7.1 Electrostatic Coating
- •6.7.2 Aqueous Film Coating Technology
- •6.7.3 Supercell Coating Technology (SCT)
- •6.7.4 Magnetically Assisted Impaction Coating (MAIC)
- •6.7.5 Dip Coating
- •6.7.6 Vacuum Film Coating
- •6.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Tablet Dosage Form
- •7.3 Global Market Analysis
- •7.4.1 Organ-Targeted Tablets
- •7.4.2 Modified Release Tablets
- •7.4.3 Miscellaneous
- •7.4.3.1 Chewable Tablets
- •7.4.3.2 Effervescent Tablets
- •7.4.3.3 Orodispersible Tablets
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Theoretical Considerations
- •8.2.1 Interfacial Properties
- •8.2.1.1 Surface Free Energy
- •8.2.1.2 Surface Potential
- •8.2.2 Electric Double Layer (EDL)
- •8.2.4 Wetting
- •8.2.5 Electrokinetic Phenomena
- •8.2.6 DLVO Theory
- •8.3.1 Flocculated Suspension
- •8.3.2 Deflocculated Suspension
- •8.4 Pharmaceutical Suspension Stability Study
- •8.4.1 Particle Settling
- •8.4.2 Particle Aggregation
- •8.4.3 Particle Growth (Ostwald Ripening)
- •8.5.3 Redispersibility
- •8.5.4 Flow Rate (F)
- •8.5.5 Viscosity Determination
- •8.5.8 Temperature Effect
- •8.5.9 Drug Content
- •8.5.10 In Vitro Dissolution Studies
- •8.5.11 Zeta Potential
- •8.5.14 Density
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.1 Macroemulsion
- •9.2.2 Microemulsion
- •9.2.3 Nanoemulsion
- •9.2.4 Pickering Emulsion
- •9.3.2 Surface Tension Theory
- •9.3.3 Molecular Adsorption Theory
- •9.3.4 Oriented Wedge Theory
- •9.4 Formulation
- •9.4.1.1 Dry Gum Method
- •9.4.1.2 Wet Gum Method
- •9.4.1.3 Bottle Method
- •9.4.1.4 In Situ Soap Method
- •9.4.1.5 Phase Titration Method
- •9.4.1.6 Phase Inversion Temperature Method
- •9.4.1.7 Spontaneous Emulsification
- •9.5 Stability
- •9.5.1 Gravitational Separation
- •9.5.1.1 Creaming
- •9.5.1.2 Sedimentation
- •9.5.1.3 Flocculation
- •9.5.2 Non-gravitational Separation
- •9.5.2.1 Coalescence
- •9.5.2.2 Droplet Aggregation
- •9.5.2.3 Ostwald Ripening
- •9.5.2.4 Phase Inversion
- •9.6 Evaluation
- •9.6.1 Macroscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.2 Microscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.3 Droplet Size Analysis
- •9.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •10.2.2 Antioxidants
- •10.2.3 Buffers
- •10.2.4 Vitamins
- •10.2.4.1 Vitamin B Complex
- •10.2.4.2 Vitamin C
- •10.2.4.3 Vitamin D
- •10.2.5 Electrolytes
- •10.2.6 Sodium
- •10.2.7 Potassium
- •10.2.8 Calcium
- •10.2.9 Magnesium
- •10.2.10 Chloride
- •10.2.12 Manganese
- •10.2.13 Selenium
- •10.2.14 Amino Acids
- •10.2.15 Carbohydrates
- •10.2.16 Dextrose
- •10.2.17 Lipids
- •10.3.1 Nutritional Support
- •10.3.2 Role of Parentral Admixture in Nutritional Deficiencies
- •10.3.3 Therapeutic Benefits
- •10.4.1.2 Aseptic Techniques
- •10.4.1.3 Dosing Considerations
- •10.5.1.1 FDA Guidelines
- •10.5.1.2 EMA Standards
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.1 Drug Solubility
- •11.2.2 Drug Stability
- •11.2.3 Skin Irritation
- •11.3 Manufacturing Challenges
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1.3 Corneal Tissue Compatibility
- •12.2.1.4 Isotonicity
- •12.2.1.6 Viscosity (Appropriate Rheological Properties)
- •12.3.1 In Situ Gelling System
- •12.3.2 Mucoadhesives
- •12.3.4 Ophthalmic Nano-Suspensions
- •12.3.6 Therapeutic Contact Lenses
- •12.3.7 Ocular Inserts
- •12.4.1 Corneal Tissue Bioprinting
- •12.4.2 Contact Lens
- •12.4.3 Drug Delivery
- •12.6.1 Physical Appearance
- •12.6.2 Identification
- •12.6.3 Assay
- •12.6.4 Impurities
- •12.6.6 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •12.6.7 Bacterial Endotoxins
- •12.6.9 Sterility Test
- •12.6.10 Osmolarity
- •12.6.11 Ocular Irritation
- •12.6.12 Isotonicity Evaluation
- •12.6.13 Stability Study
- •12.6.14 pH
- •12.6.15 Viscosity
- •12.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 Improved Dissolution Rate by Surface Area Enlargement
- •13.3.1 Top-Down Approaches
- •13.3.1.1 Wet Bead Milling
- •13.3.1.2 Evaporation/Condensation
- •13.3.1.3 High-Pressure Homogenization
- •13.3.1.4 Laser Ablation
- •13.3.1.5 Ultrasound
- •13.3.2 Bottom-Up Approaches
- •13.3.2.1 Precipitation
- •13.3.2.2 Sol-Gel
- •13.3.2.4 Liquid Antisolvent Precipitation
- •13.3.2.5 Precipitation Assisted by Acid-Base Method
- •13.3.2.6 High Gravity-Controlled Precipitation
- •13.3.2.7 Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Method
- •13.3.2.8 Emulsion Polymerization Method
- •13.3.3 Combinative Technology
- •13.3.3.1 Nano Edge Technology
- •13.3.3.2 Smart Crystal Technology
- •13.4.2 SEM
- •13.4.3 TEM
- •13.4.4 AFM
- •13.4.6 Zeta Potential
- •13.4.7 DSC
- •13.4.8 XRD
- •13.4.9 FTIR
- •13.4.10 Raman Spectroscopy
- •13.4.11 TGA
- •13.4.12 Permeation Study
- •13.5.1 Oral Delivery
- •13.5.2 Parenteral Administration
- •13.5.3 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •13.5.4 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •13.5.5 Topical Drug Delivery
- •13.5.6 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Device-Related Challenges
- •14.2.2 Biological Barriers
- •14.3.1 Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1 Conventional Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.1 Jet Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.2 Ultrasonic Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.1 Mesh Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.2 Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer (VMN)
- •14.3.2 Dry Powder Inhalers
- •14.3.2.2.1 Active Devices
- •14.3.2.2.2 Digital/Smart Devices
- •14.3.3 Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)
- •14.3.3.1.2 Extra-Fine Particle Atomization
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2.1 Herbal Nanoemulsion
- •15.2.2 Herbal Nanoparticles
- •15.2.3 Herbal Hydrogels
- •15.4.1 Thermal Analysis
- •15.4.2 High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)
- •15.4.3 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •15.4.4 Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS)
- •15.4.5 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
- •15.4.6 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GCMS)
- •15.4.7 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy
- •15.5.1 Physical Instability
- •15.5.2 Environmental Conditions
- •15.5.3 Chemical Instability
- •15.5.4 Complex Mixtures
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Approaches
- •16.3.1 Phenotypic Screening
- •16.3.2 Target-Based Methods
- •16.3.3 Knowledge-Based Methods
- •16.3.4 Signature-Based Methods
- •16.3.5 Pathway or Network-Based Methods
- •16.3.6 Targeted Mechanism-Based Methods
- •16.3.7 Pharmacovigilance-Based Drug Repurposing
- •16.4 Virtual Screening (VS)
- •16.4.1 Molecular Docking
- •16.4.2 Ligand-Based Virtual Screening (LBVS)
- •16.4.3 Pharmacophore Modelling
- •16.4.4 Similarity Searching
- •16.4.5 Machine Learning (ML)
- •16.4.6 Structure Based
- •16.4.7 Molecular Dynamics Studies
- •16.4.8 Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR)
- •16.4.9.1.1 AutoDock
- •16.4.9.1.2 Chimera
- •16.4.9.1.3 Discovery Studio
- •16.4.9.1.4 Dock
- •16.4.9.1.5 MolDock
- •16.4.9.1.6 Argus Lab
- •16.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Pre-clinical Evaluations
- •17.2.1 In Vitro Pharmacological Studies
- •17.2.2 In Vivo Toxicity Studies
- •17.2.3 In Vivo Efficacy Studies
- •17.3 Clinical Evaluations
- •17.3.1 Clinical Trial Phases
- •17.3.1.1 Phase 0
- •17.3.1.2 Phase I
- •17.3.1.3 Phase II
- •17.3.1.4 Phase III
- •17.4 Pharmacovigilance
- •17.4.2 Clinical Trial Designs
- •17.4.3 Randomized Controlled Trials
- •17.4.3.1 Parallel Arm Design
- •17.4.3.2 Cross-Over Design
- •17.4.3.3 Randomized Withdrawal Design
- •17.4.3.4 Factorial Design
- •17.4.4.1 Stratified Randomization
- •17.4.4.2 Block Randomization
- •17.4.4.3 Cluster Randomization
- •17.5 Pharmacogenomics
- •17.5.1 Pharmacokinetic Gene Variation
- •17.5.2 Pharmacodynamics Gene Variation
- •17.7 Conclusions
- •References

414
• The toxicity to native species is predicted by the QSAR model. It directs the
choice of mixes, whether synthetic or naturally occurring, with the best pharma-
cokinetic qualities.
• Predicting a range of physical and chemical properties of molecules, whether
they are medicament, pesticides, consumer products, or specialty chemicals
(Bastikar etal. 2022).
16.4.9 Commonly Used Databases/Software inVirtual Screening
The most commonly used databases/software in virtual screening are
explained below:
16.4.9.1 Available Software forDocking Studies
Molecular docking uses computers to forecast how molecules t together. It has two
main stages: the rst one is sampling the ligand and the second is scoring function.
Sampling contains algorithms which assist in recognizing the most energetically
advantageous arrangements of the ligand inside the protein’s active site, considering
how they bind together, and then those positions are ranked based on how well they
t on the basis of scoring functions (Kitchen etal. 2004; Das etal. 2020). An over-
view of various molecular docking software options highlights the most commonly
used software package.
16.4.9.1.1 AutoDock
The widely used AutoDock programme from Scripps Research Institute allows the
general public to freely and conveniently use both rigid and exible docking. It
provides several scoring systems for determining afnity and maximizes ligand
employment within receptor binding sites through the use of a Lamarckian genetic
algorithm. AutoDock (2024) can be accessed via http://autodock.scripps.edu and
supports a variety of input le formats, including PDB, MOL2, and SDF.
16.4.9.1.2 Chimera
The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), created Chimaera, a exible
programme for modelling, analysis, and visualization of molecular structures. It
provides resources for exhibiting tiny molecules, proteins, and nucleic acids in three
dimensions. The “Dock Prep” module adds hydrogens, charges, and creates molec-
ular surfaces to direct the location of ligands in target proteins. Additionally,
Chimera makes it easier to analyse docking results by visualizing binding postures
and calculating binding energies (UCSF Chimera 2024). At https://www.cgl.ucsf.
edu/chimera/, it is accessible.
16.4.9.1.3 Discovery Studio
Discovery Studio, established by Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA, is a comprehensive
molecular modelling and simulation software. It offers tools for molecular docking,
VS, protein modelling, and molecular dynamics examination. Its docking
R. Sharma et al.

415
component predicts ligand binding modes and interaction strength with target pro-
teins using various algorithms like CDOCKER, GOLD, and LibDock. The software
enables visualization, analysis, and comparison of docking results (Dassault
Systèmes 2023). It is available at https://discover.3ds.com/discovery-studio-
visualizer- download.
16.4.9.1.4 Dock
Dock is created by the UCSF Chimera team, and it’s a user-friendly molecular
docking software for positioning small molecules within receptor-binding sites. It
utilizes a grid-based approach to assess ligand-receptor binding afnity and offers
scoring functions for pose ranking. Supporting various input le formats such as
PDB, MOL2, and SDF, Dock (UCSF Dock 2024) can be accessed at http://dock.
compbio.ucsf.edu/.
16.4.9.1.5 MolDock
MolDock, created by MolSoft LLC, is a rapid and effective molecular docking soft-
ware for positioning small molecules within receptor-binding sites. Utilizing a fast
Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm, it assesses ligand-receptor binding afnity
(Fig.16.3). The software incorporates a scoring function. Supporting multiple input
le formats such as PDB, MOL2, and SDF, MolDock (Molsoft L.L.C. 2024) is
accessible at https://www.molsoft.com/about.html.
16.4.9.1.6 Argus Lab
Argus Lab, created by Mark Thomson at Pacic Northwest National Laboratory for
the Department of Energy, simulates solvent effects using a combination of quan-
tum mechanics and classical mechanics algorithms. It manages jobs including
visual design, medicinal design, and molecular modelling (ArgusLab 2024). You
can visit Argus Lab at http://www.arguslab.com.
The steps which need to perform in molecular docking study are as follows
(Fig. 16.3): identifying essential target proteins and ligands is an essential
Fig. 16.3 Flowchart for molecular docking
16 Drug Repurposing andVirtual Screening

416
component for conducting docking. Ensure the target protein is accessible through
Swiss UniProt or PDB databases. If not available, utilize Swiss model repository or
modeller programs.
Find the ligand using PubChem, Zinc, or ChmBl databases, or synthesize it using
ChemDraw or ChemSketch if unavailable. Protein preparation is essential for pre-
cise docking simulations. It involves rening the protein structure, either from a
databank like PDB or by utilization of tools, i.e. SWISS-MODEL, and adding any
necessary atoms or residues. The protein undergoes energy minimization to relax its
structure and remove any crowding. Ionizable residues’ protonation states are
adjusted for correct electrostatic interactions. Water molecules and unnecessary
ligands are eliminated from the protein structure in order to further simplify it (Agu
etal. 2023). In molecular docking, initially the binding sites can be determined. The
ligand undergoes docking with the protein, and the resulting interactions are exam-
ined. A counting function assigns a score to the most favourable docking complex
identied (The Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Czech Republic
2023; Torres etal. 2019). After the docking of ligands to the protein, an analysis is
conducted to pinpoint the most viable candidates for subsequent investigation. Each
ligand’s binding afnity is determined by predicting interaction energy, leading to
the ranking of ligands based on their afnity scores. Furthermore, the docked ligand
and protein complex structures are examined in detail to analyse important interac-
tions between the ligands and the protein, such as electrostatic, hydrophobic, and
hydrogen bonding interactions. These interactions give insights into the mechanism
of the ligands and pointers for further structural optimization (The Institute of
Molecular and Translational Medicine, Czech Republic 2023; Pinzi and
Rastelli 2019).
Few examples of virtual screening are the following: interleukin-1 receptor-
associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4) is an attractive target for treatment because of its criti-
cal role in immunological and inammatory disease pathways, as demonstrated by
a study conducted in 2016 by Zhong etal. Research has utilized ligand-based phar-
macophore modelling and three-dimensional QSAR analysis to investigate ATP
competitive inhibitors of IRAK-4, leading to the discovery of 12 strong and unique
inhibitors. These results were further conrmed by virtual screening and molecular
dynamics (MD) simulation analyses, which showed encouraging IRAK-4 inhibi-
tory potential, especially in anthraquinones ZINC09047206 and ZINC09477176
(Zhong etal. 2016).
Jawarkar etal. (2023) reported a study in which they used QSAR modelling to a
diverse dataset of 657 compounds to uncover structural features essential for ACE2
inhibitory activity, aiming to identify novel hit molecules. High predictivity
(R2tr=0.84, R2ex=0.79) was demonstrated by the created QSAR model, which
unveiled previously undiscovered characteristics and novel mechanistic insights.
This model was used to estimate the ACE2 inhibitory activity (PIC50) of 1615
ZINC FDA compound. This allowed for the identication of a hit molecule
(ZINC000027990463) with a docking score of −9.67kcal/mol (RMSD 1.4) and a
R. Sharma et al.

417
PIC50 of 8.604M.Molecular docking highlighted 25 connections with the residue
ASP40, while MD simulation afrmed the stability of the hit compound-ACE2
receptor complex over 400ns, supporting its potential as a viable ACE2 inhibitor
(Jawarkar etal. 2024).
16.4.9.2 Available Software forMolecular Dynamics Studies
The most commonly used is GROMACS which is freely available; however, graphi-
cal processing unit with good conguration is a must to run the simulations for
longer duration. Desmond, AMBER, CHARMM, Discovery Studio, etc. are also
available. The steps need to follow for molecular dynamics are as follows: step 1,
preparation of molecules; step 2, dene the box; step 3, solvation (implicit, GBMB,
PBSA, etc.; explicit, SPC, TIP3P, etc.); step 4, ionization, neutralization, and mini-
mization; step 5, equilibration (NVT, NPT); step 6, production and simulation; step
7, analysis (Jacob etal. 2017).
16.4.9.3 Databases/Software forNetwork
Various databases are available to perform the network pharmacological studies to
identify the potential repurposing drugs. The databases available for the prediction
of targets of drugs are SwissTargetPrediction (http://swisstargetprediction.ch/),
SEA database (https://sea.bkslab.org/), and so on. The targets involved in the par-
ticular diseases can be extracted from GeneCard (https://www.genecards.org/) and
DisGeNET (https://www.disgenet.org/). Venny tool (https://csbg.cnb.csic.es/
BioinfoGP/venny.html) is helpful to identify the common targets between the drugs
and diseases. The interaction among the common targets is usually checked by
STRING server. Most of the researchers have used Cytoscape for the creation and
analysis of network. Briey the steps need to follow for network pharmacology are
as follows: identication of targets of drugs, identication of targets involved in
disease, identication of common targets, interactions among common targets, net-
work construction and analysis, and enrichment analysis (Saima etal. 2024; Bhati
etal. 2024).
16.5 Conclusion
Virtual methods are playing a signicant role in the identication of repurposed
candidates against various diseases. There are number of methods to identify poten-
tial repurposing drugs; however, each method has its own merits and demerits. The
access to considerable volumes of data, including compound libraries, patent data,
pharmacological data, and published scientic literature, is one of the biggest chal-
lenges in the eld of drug repurposing. Further, experimental studies are required to
conrm the potential of identied drug in a particular disease. The extensive safety
studies are required if repurposed dose is found higher than the approved dose.
16 Drug Repurposing andVirtual Screening

418
References
Abdelmegeed E, Shaaban MI (2013) Cyclooxygenase inhibitors reduce biolm formation and
yeast-hypha conversion of uconazole resistant Candida albicans. J Microbiol 51(5):598–604
Aggarwal S, Verma SS, Aggarwal S, Gupta SC (2021) Drug repurposing for breast cancer therapy:
old weapon for new battle. Semin Cancer Biol 68:8–20
Agu PC, Aukwa CA, Orji OU, Ezeh EM, Ofoke IH, Ogbu CO etal (2023) Molecular docking
as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Sci
Rep 13(1):13398
Alem MAS, Douglas LJ (2004) Effects of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inammatory
drugs on biolms and planktonic cells of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
48(1):41–47
ArgusLab. http://www.arguslab.com/arguslab.com/ArgusLab.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
AutoDock. Homepage. https://autodock.scripps.edu/. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
Bank RPD.RCSB PDB: Homepage. https://www.rcsb.org/. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M et al (2013) NCBI
GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database
issue):D991–D995
Bastikar V, Bastikar A, Gupta P (2022) Quantitative structure–activity relationship-based compu-
tational approaches. In: Computational approaches for novel therapeutic and diagnostic design-
ing to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Academic Press, p191
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J etal (2013) GenBank.
Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database issue):D36–D42
Bhati V, Kumar A, Lather V, Sharma R, Pandita D (2024) Association of temozolomide with pro-
gressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a disproportionality analysis integrated with network
pharmacology. Expert Opin Drug Saf 23(5):649–658
Caldara M, Marmiroli N (2018) Tricyclic antidepressants inhibit Candida albicans growth and
biolm formation. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52(4):500–505
Caly L, Druce JD, Catton MG, Jans DA, Wagstaff KM (2020) The FDA-approved drug ivermectin
inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 invitro. Antivir Res 178:104787
Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Liu W, Wang J, Fan G etal (2020) A trial of lopinavir–ritonavir in adults
hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med 382(19):1787–1799
Carpenter KA, Huang X (2018) Machine learning-based virtual screening and its applications to
Alzheimer’s drug discovery: a review. Curr Pharm Des 24(28):3347–3358
Chavez-Dozal AA, Lown L, Jahng M, Walraven CJ, Lee SA (2014) In vitro analysis of naste-
ride activity against Candida albicans urinary biolm formation and lamentation. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother 58(10):5855–5862
Das DR, Kumar D, Kumar P, Dash BP (2020) Molecular docking and its application in search of
antisickling agent from Carica papaya. J Appl Biol Biotechnol 8(1):105–116
Dassault Systèmes (2023) Visualization [cited 2024 Mar 10]. https://www.3ds.com/products/
biovia/discovery- studio/visualization
De Cremer K, Lanckacker E, Cools TL, Bax M, De Brucker K, Cos P etal (2015) Artemisinins,
new miconazole potentiators resulting in increased activity against Candida albicans biolms.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59(1):421–426
de Mello TP, Silva LN, de Souza Ramos L, Frota HF, Branquinha MH, dos Santos ALS (2020)
Drug repurposing strategy against fungal biolms. Curr Topics Med Chem 20(7):509–516
de Oliveira TA, da Silva MP, Maia EHB, da Silva AM, Taranto AG (2023) Virtual screening algo-
rithms in drug discovery: a review focused on machine and deep learning methods. Drugs Drug
Candidates 2(2):311–334
Dennis EK, Garneau-Tsodikova S (2019) Synergistic combinations of azoles and antihistamines
against Candida species invitro. Med Mycol 57(7):874–884
Dinić J, Efferth T, García-Sosa AT, Grahovac J, Padrón JM, Pajeva I etal (2020) Repurposing old
drugs to ght multidrug resistant cancers. Drug Resist Updat 52:100713
R. Sharma et al.

419
Domhan S, Muschal S, Schwager C, Morath C, Wirkner U, Ansorge W etal (2008) Molecular
mechanisms of the antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of mycophenolic acid. Mol Cancer
Ther 7(6):1656–1668
Eleuteri C, Olla S, Veroni C, Umeton R, Mechelli R, Romano S etal (2017) A staged screening of
registered drugs highlights remyelinating drug candidates for clinical trials. Sci Rep 7:45780
Elky AA (2020) Ribavirin, Remdesivir, Sofosbuvir, Galidesivir, and Tenofovir against SARS-
CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp): a molecular docking study. Life Sci
253:117592
Fernández-Rivero ME, Del Pozo JL, Valentín A, de Diego AM, Pemán J, Cantón E (2017) Activity
of amphotericin B and anidulafungin combined with rifampicin, clarithromycin, ethylenedi-
aminetetraacetic acid, N-acetylcysteine, and farnesol against Candida tropicalis biolms. J
Fungi (Basel) 3(1):E16
Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im SA, Gelmon K etal (2016) Palbociclib and letrozole in
advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375(20):1925–1936
Gan J-H, Liu J-X, Liu Y, Chen S-W, Dai W-T, Xiao ZX etal (2023) DrugRep: an automatic virtual
screening server for drug repurposing. Acta Pharmacol Sin 44(4):888–896
Giordano D, Biancaniello C, Argenio MA, Facchiano A (2022) Drug design by pharmacophore
and virtual screening approach. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 15(5):646
Hamdoun S, Jung P, Efferth T (2017) Drug repurposing of the anthelmintic niclosamide to treat mul-
tidrug-resistant leukemia. Front Pharmacol 8:110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00110.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/. Accessed 16 Mar 2024
Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, McKusick VA (2005) Online Mendelian
Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic
Acids Res 33(Database issue):D514–D517
Holbrook SYL, Garzan A, Dennis EK, Shrestha SK, Garneau-Tsodikova S (2017) Repurposing
antipsychotic drugs into antifungal agents: synergistic combinations of azoles and bromperidol
derivatives in the treatment of various fungal infections. Eur J Med Chem 139:12–21
Jacob KS, Ganguly S, Kumar P, Poddar R, Kumar A (2017) Homology model, molecular dynam-
ics simulation and novel pyrazole analogs design of Candida albicans CYP450 lanosterol 14
α-demethylase, a target enzyme for antifungal therapy. J Biomol Struct Dyn 35(7):1446–1463
Jawarkar RD, Zaki MEA, Al-Hussain SA, Al-Mutairi AA, Samad A, Mukerjee N etal (2024)
QSAR modeling approaches to identify a novel ACE2 inhibitor that selectively bind with the C
and N terminals of the ectodomain. J Biomol Struct Dyn 42(5):2550–2569
Jin G, Wong STC (2014) Toward better drug repositioning: prioritizing and integrating existing
methods into efcient pipelines. Drug Discov Today 19(5):637–644
Kathwate GH, Shinde RB, Karuppayil SM (2015) Antiepileptic drugs inhibit growth, dimorphism,
and biolm mode of growth in human pathogen Candida albicans. Assay Drug Dev Technol
13(6):307–312
Kim J, Tang JY, Gong R, Kim J, Lee JJ, Clemons KV et al (2010) Itraconazole, a commonly
used antifungal that inhibits hedgehog pathway activity and cancer growth. Cancer Cell
17(4):388–399
Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J (2004) Docking and scoring in virtual screening for
drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3(11):935–949
Ko HT, Hsu LH, Yang SY, Chen YL (2020) Repurposing the thrombopoietin receptor agonist
eltrombopag as an anticryptococcal agent. Med Mycol 58(4):493–504
Kulkarni VS, Alagarsamy V, Solomon VR, Jose PA, Murugesan S (2023) Drug repurposing: an
effective tool in modern drug discovery. Russ J Bioorg Chem 49(2):157–166
Maia EHB, Assis LC, de Oliveira TA, da Silva AM, Taranto AG (2020) Structure-based virtual
screening: from classical to articial intelligence. Front Chem 8:343. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fchem.2020.00343. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/. Accessed on 10 Mar 2024
March-Vila E, Pinzi L, Sturm N, Tinivella A, Engkvist O, Chen H etal (2017) On the integration
of in silico drug design methods for drug repurposing. Front Pharmacol 8:298
Mewes HW, Hani J, Pfeiffer F, Frishman D (1998) MIPS: a database for protein sequences and
complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 26(1):33–37
16 Drug Repurposing andVirtual Screening

420
Miró-Canturri A, Ayerbe-Algaba R, Smani Y (2019) Drug repurposing for the treatment of bacte-
rial and fungal infections. Front Microbiol 10:41
Molsoft L.L.C.About Molsoft L.L.C. https://www.molsoft.com/about.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
Napolitano F, Zhao Y, Moreira VM, Tagliaferri R, Kere J, D’Amato M etal (2013) Drug reposi-
tioning: a machine-learning approach through data integration. J Cheminform 5(1):30
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (2017) An open-label, proof-of-
concept study to evaluate the safety and efcacy of dexpramipexole (KNS-760704) in subjects
with hypereosinophilic syndrome. clinicaltrials.gov. Report No.: NCT02101138. https://clini-
caltrials.gov/study/NCT02101138. Accessed 1 Jan 2024
Noguchi S, Kim HJ, Jesena A, Parmar V, Sato N, Wang HC etal (2016) Phase 3, open-label, ran-
domized study comparing 3-monthly with monthly goserelin in pre-menopausal women with
estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer 23(5):771–779
Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M (1999) KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia
of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 27(1):29–34
Ogundeji AO, Pohl CH, Sebolai OM (2016) Repurposing of aspirin and ibuprofen as candidate
anti-Cryptococcus drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60(8):4799–4808
Oprea TI, Overington JP (2015) Computational and practical aspects of drug repositioning. Assay
Drug Dev Technol 13(6):299–306
Pinzi L, Rastelli G (2019) Molecular docking: shifting paradigms in drug discovery. Int J Mol Sci
20(18):4331
PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
Rajasekharan SK, Lee JH, Lee J (2019) Aripiprazole repurposed as an inhibitor of biolm forma-
tion and sterol biosynthesis in multidrug-resistant Candida albicans. Int J Antimicrob Agents
54(4):518–523
Rana R, Sharma R, Kumar A (2019) Repurposing of uvastatin against Candida albicans CYP450
lanosterol 14 α-demethylase, a target enzyme for antifungal therapy: an in silico and invitro
study. Curr Mol Med 19(7):506–524
Research C for DE (2023) New developments in regulatory QSAR modeling: a new QSAR model
for predicting blood brain barrier permeability. FDA [cited 2024 Mar 10]. https://www.fda.
gov/drugs/regulatory- science- action/new- developments- regulatory- qsar- modeling- new- qsar-
model- predicting- blood- brain- barrier- permeability
Royce ME, Osman D (2015) Everolimus in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast
Cancer (Auckl) 9:BCBCR.S29268
Sahoo BM, Ravi Kumar BVV, Sruti J, Mahapatra MK, Banik BK, Borah P (2021) Drug repur-
posing strategy (DRS): emerging approach to identify potential therapeutics for treatment of
novel coronavirus infection. Front Mol Biosci. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/
fmolb.2021.628144
Saima LS, Sharma R, Kumar A (2024) Role of network pharmacology in prediction of mecha-
nism of neuroprotective compounds. In: Neuroprotection: method and protocols. Springer US,
NewYork, pp159–179
Schein CH (2020) Repurposing approved drugs on the pathway to novel therapies. Med Res Rev
40(2):586–605
Seiler KP, George GA, Happ MP, Bodycombe NE, Carrinski HA, Norton S etal (2008) ChemBank:
a small-molecule screening and cheminformatics resource database. Nucleic Acids Res
36(Database issue):D351–D359
Sgobba M, Caporuscio F, Anighoro A, Portioli C, Rastelli G (2012) Application of a post-docking
procedure based on MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA on single and multiple protein conformations.
Eur J Med Chem 58:431–440
Shah M, Patel M, Shah M, Patel M, Prajapati M (2024) Computational transformation in drug
discovery: a comprehensive study on molecular docking and quantitative structure activity
relationship (QSAR). Intell Pharm 2:589. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S2949866X24000340. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
Shinde RB, Raut JS, Chauhan NM, Karuppayil SM (2013) Chloroquine sensitizes biolms of
Candida albicans to antifungal azoles. Braz J Infect Dis 17(4):395–400
R. Sharma et al.

421
Siles SA, Srinivasan A, Pierce CG, Lopez-Ribot JL, Ramasubramanian AK (2013) High-throughput
screening of a collection of known pharmacologically active small compounds for identica-
tion of Candida albicans biolm inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(8):3681–3687
Smith KJ (2016) Computational approaches to fragment based screening. PhD thesis. University
of Essex. https://repository.essex.ac.uk/17574/. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
Stemmler HJ, diGioia D, Freier W, Tessen HW, Gitsch G, Jonat W etal (2011) Randomised phase
II trial of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gemcitabine plus
capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 104(7):1071–1078
The Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Czech Republic (2023) Phase II open
labeled trial of disulram with copper in metastatic breast cancer. clinicaltrials.gov. Report
No.: NCT03323346. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03323346. Accessed 1 Jan 2024
Toniati P, Piva S, Cattalini M, Garrafa E, Regola F, Castelli F etal (2020) Tocilizumab for the treat-
ment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with hyperinammatory syndrome and acute respiratory
failure: a single center study of 100 patients in Brescia, Italy. Autoimmun Rev 19(7):102568
Torres PHM, Sodero ACR, Joly P, Silva FP Jr (2019) Key topics in molecular docking for drug
design. Int J Mol Sci 20(18):4574
Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, Bondarenko I, Im SA, Masuda N etal (2018) Overall survival with
palbociclib and fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1926–1936
UCSF Chimera. Home Page. https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
UCSF Dock. Google Search. https://dock.compbio.ucsf.edu/. Accessed 10 Mar 2024
Wakharde AA, Halbandge SD, Phule DB, Karuppayil SM (2018) Anticancer drugs as antibiolm
agents in Candida albicans: potential targets. Assay Drug Dev Technol 16(5):232–246
Wall G, Herrera N, Lopez-Ribot JL (2019) Repositionable compounds with antifungal activity
against multidrug resistant Candida auris identied in the medicines for malaria venture’s
pathogen box. J Fungi (Basel) 5(4):92
Wang Y, Fan G, Salam A, Horby P, Hayden FG, Chen C etal (2020) Comparative effectiveness of
combined Favipiravir and oseltamivir therapy versus oseltamivir monotherapy in critically ill
patients with inuenza virus infection. J Infect Dis 221(10):1688–1698
Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, Lo EJ, Marcu A, Grant JR etal (2018) DrugBank 5.0: a major
update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res 46(D1):D1074–D1082
Wu C, Gudivada RC, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG (2013) Computational drug repositioning through
heterogeneous network clustering. BMC Syst Biol 7(Suppl 5):S6
Yu Q et al (2013) In vitro activity of verapamil alone and in combination with uconazole or
tunicamycin against Candida albicans biolms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 41(2):179–182
Zhong L, Zhou L, Tian Y, You R (2016) Identication of novel IRAK-4 inhibitors through pharma-
cophore modeling, atom-based 3D-QSAR, docking strategies and molecular dynamics simula-
tion. Lett Drug Des Discov 13(9):879–887
Zucchini G, Geuna E, Milani A, Aversa C, Martinello R, Montemurro F (2015) Clinical utility of
exemestane in the treatment of breast cancer. Int J Womens Health 7:551–563
16 Drug Repurposing andVirtual Screening

423
17
Pre-clinical andClinical Studies,
Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacogenomics,
andCommercialization
ofPharmaceutical Products
MitJoshi andBhoomikaM.Patel
Abstract
Even with the development of new technologies and understanding of patho-
physiology of diseases, drug discovery is still considered as a long and tedious
process comprised of different stages which eventually leads to the availability
of new drugs to the entire population. Development of new drug starts with
research on target identication which generally takes place during academic
research. Target identication and validation lead to the synthesis of new mole-
cules through different in silico techniques such as high-throughput screening
and other molecular modeling. New molecules are then examined for possible
interaction with the target molecule which leads to identication and validation
of new molecule. New molecules then undergo pre-clinical and clinical studies.
Pre-clinical evaluations mainly involve the assessment of the safety and efcacy
of novel molecules invitro and invivo setup before going into the clinical phase.
In the clinical phase, new drug molecules are scrutinized for their safety and
efcacy in human patients. After successful clinical trials, the new drug is
allowed for commercialization in the market. Clinical trials assess the safety and
efcacy of new drugs in a relatively small population compared to the entire
population. When a drug enters the market, a pharmacovigilance program is ini-
tiated to track and report any adverse drug reaction associated with the drug.
Sometimes, certain drug does not follow the expected ADME due to variation in
the genetic build of a particular population. Due to that, pharmacogenomic
assessment of each patient is important to personalized medication to certain
M. Joshi
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India
B. M. Patel (
*)
National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
e-mail: bhoomika.patel@nfsu.ac.in

424
patient populations. Drug discovery is a vast process and each step has its advan-
tages and disadvantages. Here we discuss pre-clinical and clinical studies, along
with pharmacovigilance and pharmacogenomic programs. In the end, we discuss
the commercialization of pharmaceutical products which is different from any
other product available in the market.
Keywords
Clinical trials · Pre-clinical · Pharmacovigilance · Pharmacogenomics · Toxicity
· Efcacy
17.1 Introduction
The need for new drug candidates arises in two scenarios: First is a medical condi-
tion or disease or the emergence of a new disease such as COVID-19 where no
suitable treatment or drug is available. Second, there is an unmet medical need, or
currently available intervention is not enough to mitigate the disease (Hughes
etal. 2011).
The primary or basic research, most carried out in academia, provides hypothe-
ses regarding the potential pathophysiology and identifying particular targets. The
result of this research further requires proper validation before beginning the next
phase of lead discovery to support the drug discovery effort (Mohs and Greig 2017).
Despite signicant achievements made in unraveling the pathophysiology of bio-
logical systems at the molecular level and substantial progress in the innovation of
novel technologies, the journey of drug discovery remains extensive and resource-
intensive. The process of drug development is characterized by prolonged duration,
substantial expenses, and a notable rate of setbacks. To address these challenges,
innovative methodologies, such as articial intelligence (Paul et al. 2021) and
groundbreaking in vitro technologies, are being harnessed to accelerate research
and development efforts, aiming to deliver novel medications to patients in a more
efcient manner.
Developing a new drug is time-consuming and tedious and divided into several
segments. Drug development starts with genomic and proteomic studies with target
identication and validation (Schenone etal. 2013). This data leads to the synthesis
of a drug or a molecule and its optimization (Bruno etal. 2019). The discovery of
the molecule was further investigated through pre-clinical (in silico studies, toxicity
studies, efcacy studies) and clinical trials (Steinmetz and Spack 2009). When the
drug is approved for commercial use, it is studied and tracked in a large population
through a pharmacovigilance program (Kalaiselvan etal. 2019). The entire process
takes around 10–15years (Fig.17.1).
Every category is further divided into many subcategories like drug discovery
divided into basic research, target identication and validation, discovery and iden-
tication of hit and lead, optimization of lead, pre-clinical studies, and clinical
studies.
M. Joshi and B. M. Patel
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
