Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5441_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Preformulation Studies
- •1.2.1 Solubility
- •1.2.2 Partition Coefficient
- •1.3.2 Parenteral Dosage Forms
- •1.3.3 Oral Dosage Form
- •1.3.4 Transdermal Dosage Form
- •1.3.5 Inhalational Formulation
- •1.3.6 Nasal Formulations
- •1.3.7 Ophthalmic Dosage Form
- •1.4 Scale-Up Studies
- •1.4.1 Pilot Plant
- •1.4.2 Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)
- •1.2.4 Bulk Properties
- •1.3 Prototype Development
- •1.4.3 Regulatory Approval
- •1.5 Commercialisation
- •1.5.1.5 Life Cycle Extension Strategies
- •1.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.1.2 Product Specification
- •2.1.3.1 In-Process Specification
- •2.1.3.2 Release Specification
- •2.1.3.3 Shelf Life Specification
- •2.1.4 Specification Design
- •2.1.5 Specification Justification
- •2.2.3 ICH Q6A Guideline
- •2.2.3.1 Objective
- •2.2.3.2 New Drug Product
- •2.2.3.3 New Drug Substance
- •2.2.3.4 Universal Tests
- •2.2.3.5 Specific Tests
- •2.2.4 ICH Q6B Guideline
- •2.2.4.1 Scope
- •2.2.4.2 Specifications
- •2.2.5.1 Q8(R2): Structure—Parent Guideline (Knight 2014)
- •2.2.5.1.1 Pharmaceutical Development: Introduction
- •Drug Substances
- •Excipients
- •2.2.5.1.3 Drug Product
- •Formulation Development
- •Overages
- •2.2.5.1.4 Manufacturing Process Development
- •2.2.5.1.5 Container Closure System
- •2.2.5.1.6 Microbiological Attributes
- •2.2.5.1.7 Compatibility
- •2.2.5.2 Q8(R2): Structure—Annex
- •2.2.5.2.1 Introduction
- •Quality Target Product Profile
- •Critical Quality Attributes (CQA)
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Drug Substance-Related Information
- •2.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.3.1 Factorial Designs (FD)
- •3.3.2 Fractional Factorial Designs (FFDs)
- •3.3.3 Plackett–Burman Designs (PBDs)
- •3.3.4 Central Composite Designs (CCD)
- •3.3.5 Box–Behnken Designs (BBD)
- •3.3.6 Equiradial Designs
- •3.3.7 Mixture Designs
- •3.3.8 Taguchi Designs
- •3.3.9 Optimal Designs
- •3.4.1 Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)
- •3.4.2 Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
- •3.4.3 Risk Management
- •3.4.4 Design Space
- •3.4.5 Control Strategy
- •3.6.2 Constraint-Based Optimization
- •3.6.3 Multi-objective Optimization
- •3.6.4 Expert Systems
- •3.6.5 Evolutionary Algorithms
- •3.9.1 Design-Expert
- •3.9.2 SIMCA
- •3.9.3 Minitab
- •3.9.4 JMP
- •3.9.5 MATLAB
- •3.9.6 Aspen Plus
- •3.9.7 AutoCAD
- •3.10.1 Pharmaceutical Industry
- •3.10.2 Food Industry
- •3.10.3 Chemical Industry
- •3.10.4 Biotechnology Industry
- •3.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.3.1.1 Fillers/Diluents
- •4.3.1.2 Binders
- •4.3.2.2 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.3 Sweeteners
- •4.3.2.4 pH Adjusters
- •4.3.2.5 Preservatives
- •4.3.2.6 Surfactant
- •4.3.2.7 Suspending Agent
- •4.3.2.8 Emulsifying Agent
- •4.3.2.9 Colorants
- •4.3.2.10 Viscosity Modifiers
- •4.3.3.1 Penetration Enhancers
- •4.3.3.2 Solvents/Solubilisers
- •4.3.3.3 Adhesives
- •4.3.3.5 Plasticisers
- •4.3.4.1.1 Bulking Agents
- •4.3.4.1.2 Lyoprotectants
- •4.3.4.1.3 Antioxidants
- •4.3.4.1.4 Buffering Agents
- •4.3.4.2.1 Buffers
- •4.3.4.2.2 Preservatives
- •4.3.4.2.3 Tonicity Adjusters
- •4.3.4.2.4 Solvent System
- •4.3.4.2.5 Solubilisers
- •4.4.1 Physical Incompatibilities
- •4.4.2 Chemical Incompatibilities
- •4.3.1.3 Disintegrants
- •4.3.1.5 Coating Agents
- •4.3.1.8 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.1 Vehicles
- •4.4.3 Therapeutic or Physiological Incompatibilities
- •4.6 Related Regulatory Perspectives
- •4.6.1 GRAS
- •4.6.2 IIG
- •4.6.3 IPEC
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Binders
- •5.2.1.1 Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)
- •5.2.1.2 LYCATAB
- •5.2.1.3 GalenIQ (Isomalt)
- •5.2.2 Disintegrants
- •5.2.3 Lubricants
- •5.2.4 Co-processed Excipients
- •5.2.4.2 COMBILOSE
- •5.2.4.3 PEARLITOL CR-H
- •5.2.4.4 PROSOLV EASYtab SP (Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose)
- •5.3 New-Age Material Handling Techniques Developed
- •5.3.1 Automated Dispensing System
- •5.3.1.1 Unit Dose Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.2 Centralised Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.3 Robotic Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.2 Vacuum Conveying Systems
- •5.3.3 Flexible Screw Conveyors
- •5.4.1 Automation
- •5.4.2 Enhanced Safety
- •5.4.3 Higher Productivity
- •5.4.4 Enhanced Accuracy
- •5.4.5 Reduced Costs
- •5.6.1 Widely Used Databases
- •5.6.5.1 Tablets
- •5.6.5.2 Predicting Drug Release
- •5.6.5.4 Detecting Tablet Defects
- •5.6.5.5 Granules
- •5.7 Continuous Manufacturing Technology
- •5.7.1.1 Regulatory Uncertainties
- •5.7.1.2 Process Automation Technologies (PAT)
- •5.7.1.3 Equipment
- •5.7.1.5 Modern Process Control Techniques
- •5.8.1 Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
- •5.8.1.1 Process Variables
- •5.8.2 Applications
- •5.8.2.1 Stereolithography (SLA)
- •5.8.2.2 Printing Dosage Forms
- •5.8.3.1 Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)
- •5.8.3.3 Drawbacks
- •5.8.4.1 On-Demand Manufacturing
- •5.8.4.2 Improved Quality Dosage Forms
- •5.9 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Excipients
- •6.2.1 Superdisintegrants
- •6.2.3 Lubricants/Anti-adherents
- •6.2.4 Solubility/Dissolution Enhancers
- •6.2.5 Drug Release Rate Modifiers
- •6.2.6 Co-processed Excipients
- •6.3.1 Advanced Granulation Approaches
- •6.4 Process Automation
- •6.4.2 Fundamental Process Control Instruments
- •6.4.2.2 Rotary Tablet Press
- •6.5.1 Capping
- •6.5.2 Lamination
- •6.5.3 Chipping
- •6.5.4.1 Double Impression
- •6.6 Tablet Coating
- •6.6.1 Sugar Coating
- •6.6.2 Film Coating
- •6.7.1 Electrostatic Coating
- •6.7.2 Aqueous Film Coating Technology
- •6.7.3 Supercell Coating Technology (SCT)
- •6.7.4 Magnetically Assisted Impaction Coating (MAIC)
- •6.7.5 Dip Coating
- •6.7.6 Vacuum Film Coating
- •6.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Tablet Dosage Form
- •7.3 Global Market Analysis
- •7.4.1 Organ-Targeted Tablets
- •7.4.2 Modified Release Tablets
- •7.4.3 Miscellaneous
- •7.4.3.1 Chewable Tablets
- •7.4.3.2 Effervescent Tablets
- •7.4.3.3 Orodispersible Tablets
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Theoretical Considerations
- •8.2.1 Interfacial Properties
- •8.2.1.1 Surface Free Energy
- •8.2.1.2 Surface Potential
- •8.2.2 Electric Double Layer (EDL)
- •8.2.4 Wetting
- •8.2.5 Electrokinetic Phenomena
- •8.2.6 DLVO Theory
- •8.3.1 Flocculated Suspension
- •8.3.2 Deflocculated Suspension
- •8.4 Pharmaceutical Suspension Stability Study
- •8.4.1 Particle Settling
- •8.4.2 Particle Aggregation
- •8.4.3 Particle Growth (Ostwald Ripening)
- •8.5.3 Redispersibility
- •8.5.4 Flow Rate (F)
- •8.5.5 Viscosity Determination
- •8.5.8 Temperature Effect
- •8.5.9 Drug Content
- •8.5.10 In Vitro Dissolution Studies
- •8.5.11 Zeta Potential
- •8.5.14 Density
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.1 Macroemulsion
- •9.2.2 Microemulsion
- •9.2.3 Nanoemulsion
- •9.2.4 Pickering Emulsion
- •9.3.2 Surface Tension Theory
- •9.3.3 Molecular Adsorption Theory
- •9.3.4 Oriented Wedge Theory
- •9.4 Formulation
- •9.4.1.1 Dry Gum Method
- •9.4.1.2 Wet Gum Method
- •9.4.1.3 Bottle Method
- •9.4.1.4 In Situ Soap Method
- •9.4.1.5 Phase Titration Method
- •9.4.1.6 Phase Inversion Temperature Method
- •9.4.1.7 Spontaneous Emulsification
- •9.5 Stability
- •9.5.1 Gravitational Separation
- •9.5.1.1 Creaming
- •9.5.1.2 Sedimentation
- •9.5.1.3 Flocculation
- •9.5.2 Non-gravitational Separation
- •9.5.2.1 Coalescence
- •9.5.2.2 Droplet Aggregation
- •9.5.2.3 Ostwald Ripening
- •9.5.2.4 Phase Inversion
- •9.6 Evaluation
- •9.6.1 Macroscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.2 Microscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.3 Droplet Size Analysis
- •9.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •10.2.2 Antioxidants
- •10.2.3 Buffers
- •10.2.4 Vitamins
- •10.2.4.1 Vitamin B Complex
- •10.2.4.2 Vitamin C
- •10.2.4.3 Vitamin D
- •10.2.5 Electrolytes
- •10.2.6 Sodium
- •10.2.7 Potassium
- •10.2.8 Calcium
- •10.2.9 Magnesium
- •10.2.10 Chloride
- •10.2.12 Manganese
- •10.2.13 Selenium
- •10.2.14 Amino Acids
- •10.2.15 Carbohydrates
- •10.2.16 Dextrose
- •10.2.17 Lipids
- •10.3.1 Nutritional Support
- •10.3.2 Role of Parentral Admixture in Nutritional Deficiencies
- •10.3.3 Therapeutic Benefits
- •10.4.1.2 Aseptic Techniques
- •10.4.1.3 Dosing Considerations
- •10.5.1.1 FDA Guidelines
- •10.5.1.2 EMA Standards
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.1 Drug Solubility
- •11.2.2 Drug Stability
- •11.2.3 Skin Irritation
- •11.3 Manufacturing Challenges
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1.3 Corneal Tissue Compatibility
- •12.2.1.4 Isotonicity
- •12.2.1.6 Viscosity (Appropriate Rheological Properties)
- •12.3.1 In Situ Gelling System
- •12.3.2 Mucoadhesives
- •12.3.4 Ophthalmic Nano-Suspensions
- •12.3.6 Therapeutic Contact Lenses
- •12.3.7 Ocular Inserts
- •12.4.1 Corneal Tissue Bioprinting
- •12.4.2 Contact Lens
- •12.4.3 Drug Delivery
- •12.6.1 Physical Appearance
- •12.6.2 Identification
- •12.6.3 Assay
- •12.6.4 Impurities
- •12.6.6 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •12.6.7 Bacterial Endotoxins
- •12.6.9 Sterility Test
- •12.6.10 Osmolarity
- •12.6.11 Ocular Irritation
- •12.6.12 Isotonicity Evaluation
- •12.6.13 Stability Study
- •12.6.14 pH
- •12.6.15 Viscosity
- •12.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 Improved Dissolution Rate by Surface Area Enlargement
- •13.3.1 Top-Down Approaches
- •13.3.1.1 Wet Bead Milling
- •13.3.1.2 Evaporation/Condensation
- •13.3.1.3 High-Pressure Homogenization
- •13.3.1.4 Laser Ablation
- •13.3.1.5 Ultrasound
- •13.3.2 Bottom-Up Approaches
- •13.3.2.1 Precipitation
- •13.3.2.2 Sol-Gel
- •13.3.2.4 Liquid Antisolvent Precipitation
- •13.3.2.5 Precipitation Assisted by Acid-Base Method
- •13.3.2.6 High Gravity-Controlled Precipitation
- •13.3.2.7 Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Method
- •13.3.2.8 Emulsion Polymerization Method
- •13.3.3 Combinative Technology
- •13.3.3.1 Nano Edge Technology
- •13.3.3.2 Smart Crystal Technology
- •13.4.2 SEM
- •13.4.3 TEM
- •13.4.4 AFM
- •13.4.6 Zeta Potential
- •13.4.7 DSC
- •13.4.8 XRD
- •13.4.9 FTIR
- •13.4.10 Raman Spectroscopy
- •13.4.11 TGA
- •13.4.12 Permeation Study
- •13.5.1 Oral Delivery
- •13.5.2 Parenteral Administration
- •13.5.3 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •13.5.4 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •13.5.5 Topical Drug Delivery
- •13.5.6 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Device-Related Challenges
- •14.2.2 Biological Barriers
- •14.3.1 Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1 Conventional Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.1 Jet Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.2 Ultrasonic Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.1 Mesh Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.2 Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer (VMN)
- •14.3.2 Dry Powder Inhalers
- •14.3.2.2.1 Active Devices
- •14.3.2.2.2 Digital/Smart Devices
- •14.3.3 Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)
- •14.3.3.1.2 Extra-Fine Particle Atomization
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2.1 Herbal Nanoemulsion
- •15.2.2 Herbal Nanoparticles
- •15.2.3 Herbal Hydrogels
- •15.4.1 Thermal Analysis
- •15.4.2 High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)
- •15.4.3 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •15.4.4 Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS)
- •15.4.5 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
- •15.4.6 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GCMS)
- •15.4.7 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy
- •15.5.1 Physical Instability
- •15.5.2 Environmental Conditions
- •15.5.3 Chemical Instability
- •15.5.4 Complex Mixtures
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Approaches
- •16.3.1 Phenotypic Screening
- •16.3.2 Target-Based Methods
- •16.3.3 Knowledge-Based Methods
- •16.3.4 Signature-Based Methods
- •16.3.5 Pathway or Network-Based Methods
- •16.3.6 Targeted Mechanism-Based Methods
- •16.3.7 Pharmacovigilance-Based Drug Repurposing
- •16.4 Virtual Screening (VS)
- •16.4.1 Molecular Docking
- •16.4.2 Ligand-Based Virtual Screening (LBVS)
- •16.4.3 Pharmacophore Modelling
- •16.4.4 Similarity Searching
- •16.4.5 Machine Learning (ML)
- •16.4.6 Structure Based
- •16.4.7 Molecular Dynamics Studies
- •16.4.8 Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR)
- •16.4.9.1.1 AutoDock
- •16.4.9.1.2 Chimera
- •16.4.9.1.3 Discovery Studio
- •16.4.9.1.4 Dock
- •16.4.9.1.5 MolDock
- •16.4.9.1.6 Argus Lab
- •16.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Pre-clinical Evaluations
- •17.2.1 In Vitro Pharmacological Studies
- •17.2.2 In Vivo Toxicity Studies
- •17.2.3 In Vivo Efficacy Studies
- •17.3 Clinical Evaluations
- •17.3.1 Clinical Trial Phases
- •17.3.1.1 Phase 0
- •17.3.1.2 Phase I
- •17.3.1.3 Phase II
- •17.3.1.4 Phase III
- •17.4 Pharmacovigilance
- •17.4.2 Clinical Trial Designs
- •17.4.3 Randomized Controlled Trials
- •17.4.3.1 Parallel Arm Design
- •17.4.3.2 Cross-Over Design
- •17.4.3.3 Randomized Withdrawal Design
- •17.4.3.4 Factorial Design
- •17.4.4.1 Stratified Randomization
- •17.4.4.2 Block Randomization
- •17.4.4.3 Cluster Randomization
- •17.5 Pharmacogenomics
- •17.5.1 Pharmacokinetic Gene Variation
- •17.5.2 Pharmacodynamics Gene Variation
- •17.7 Conclusions
- •References

118
5.3.1 Automated Dispensing System
Solid oral dosage form material handling in the present era relies heavily on auto-
mated dispensing devices. Electronic devices called automated dispensing systems
are used to accurately and consistently deliver medicine (Paul etal. 2023). They
have transformed the way pharmacies and pharmaceutical companies handle phar-
maceuticals, making the procedure quicker, more effective and more precise (Sng
et al. 2019). Automated dispensing systems (ADS) are computer-controlled
machines that store, dispense and track medication inventory (Shin etal. 2023). The
computer system monitors the medicine dispensing process and controls the dis-
pensing device. The computer system may also produce reports on drug consump-
tion, stock levels and patient information (Gharib etal. 2023). For the purpose of
ensuring that prescription orders are appropriately lled and documented, ADS can
also be connected with electronic health records (EHR). Medication error reduction
is one of the main advantages of ADS (Brax etal. 2023). One research found that
one in ve drug dosages given in hospitals are delivered incorrectly, demonstrating
the prevalence of pharmaceutical mistakes in the healthcare industry (Paimard etal.
2023). By ensuring that the right prescription and dosage are administered, auto-
mated dispensing systems may dramatically lower the chance of medication mis-
takes. The capacity of ADS to enhance drug management is another benet. It is
simpler for pharmacies to maintain their stock levels and replenish medication as
necessary, thanks to ADS’s ability to keep pharmaceutical inventory and track con-
sumption (Benoit and Beney 2011). These devices automate and employ robotics to
correctly distribute the right amount of material. By delivering drugs in exact
amounts, ADS can assist decrease waste by lowering the quantity of medication that
is thrown away (Alahmari etal. 2022). On the market, there are several varieties of
automated dispensing systems (ADS). The most typical examples include the
following:
5.3.1.1 Unit Dose Dispensing Systems
These systems distribute medication in premeasured amounts, which makes it sim-
pler for patients to take their prescription as prescribed and lowers the possibility of
medication mistakes (Hänninen etal. 2023). These systems deliver medication in
specic dosages, making them perfect for healthcare facilities like hospitals and
nursing homes (Dubourg etal. 2013).
5.3.1.2 Centralised Dispensing Systems
In hospitals, clinics and other healthcare institutions, centralised dispensing systems
are frequently used to administer solid oral dose forms including tablets, capsules
and powders (Balka and Nutland 2004). Compared to conventional manual dispens-
ing techniques, these systems provide a number of benets, including enhanced
efciency, accuracy and safety (Tsao etal. 2014).
P. Saikiran etal.

119
5.3.1.3 Robotic Dispensing Systems
Robots are used in these systems to take medications out of storage and provide
them to patients (Hänninen etal. 2023). These robots are set up to retrieve pharma-
ceuticals from predetermined storage places and distribute them into bottles or blis-
ter packs of various sizes (Batson etal. 2021).
5.3.2 Vacuum Conveying Systems
Vacuum conveying is one of the most widely used material handling techniques in
solid oral dosage forms (Beaulac etal. 2022). A vacuum generator, a conveying
pipeline and a receiving vessel are the three major parts of vacuum conveying sys-
tems for solid oral dosage forms. The solid dosage form is dragged through the
pipeline and into the receiving vessel by the negative pressure that the vacuum gen-
erator produces in the pipeline (Verstraeten etal. 2017). Stainless steel or similar
substance suited for pharmaceutical uses is often used to make the pipeline (Tu and
Yan 2022).
The utilisation of advanced sensors and controls is among the major develop-
ments in vacuum conveying systems for solid dosage forms (Bhatia 2019). These
systems have the ability to continuously monitor the ow of material and adapt the
vacuum pressure and ow rate as necessary (Hou etal. 2023). This makes it possible
to precisely manage the conveying process, which is necessary when working with
delicate or sensitive materials (Chen et al. 2022). The application of specialist
machinery for handling powders and other ne materials is another development in
vacuum conveying systems for solid oral dosage forms (Klinzing etal. 2010). These
valves are intended to stop substances from escaping into the environment or being
caught in the valve. Additionally, they may be set up to reduce dust production,
which is crucial for maintaining a hygienic and secure working environment (Gomes
de Freitas etal. 2021). The accuracy, dependability, and adaptability of vacuum
conveying systems to a variety of pharmaceutical applications are increasing due to
advancements in sensor technology, specialised machinery, and system design
(Kuang etal. 2020).
5.3.3 Flexible Screw Conveyors
Flexible screw conveyors are a kind of mechanical conveyor that transports goods
through a tube or duct using a revolving helical screw. This approach is very adapt-
able and may be created to meet the particular requirements of a production facility
(Chongchitpaisan and Sudsawat 2022). Since they can handle a variety of materials
and offer exibility of conveying distance, angle and routing, these conveyors are
enormously benecial in the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals. Additionally, ex-
ible screw conveyors are kind to the goods and can reduce break or damages (Zhang
etal. 2021a).
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms

120
Flexible screw conveyors’ capacity to handle a variety of materials is one of its
main benets. This is crucial in the production of pharmaceuticals since various
materials may need to be carried at various points along the manufacturing process
(Zhang etal. 2021b). Flexible screw conveyors are an adaptable option for pharma-
ceutical manufacturing since they can easily handle powders, granules, capsules,
tablets and other products. Additionally, exible screw conveyors are simple to
clean and maintain, which is crucial in the pharmaceutical business where cleanli-
ness and hygienic conditions are of the utmost importance (Dhaval etal. 2022).
Furthermore, these conveyers are easy to clean and are made of materials that are
resistant to corrosion and degradation (Dahlgren etal. 2019).
5.4 Advantages ofNew-Age Material Handling Techniques
5.4.1 Automation
Modern material handling techniques are characterised by automation, which pro-
vides organisations with a number of advantages (Sng etal. 2019). Automated solu-
tions may boost productivity, cut labour expenses, increase accuracy and lower the
risk of accidents and injuries from human handling (Rao and Pathak 2022).
5.4.2 Enhanced Safety
Modern techniques for material handling can also increase workplace security.
Automated machinery and systems can lower the chance of disasters and injuries,
which is crucial in elds that deal with big or bulky objects (Denis etal. 2020).
5.4.3 Higher Productivity
Modern approaches to material management can boost output in a number of ways
(Ansari and Gangil 2022). Automated systems reduce bottlenecks and increase ef-
ciency by handling a greater number of materials in a shorter amount of time
(Björnsson etal. 2018).
5.4.4 Enhanced Accuracy
Additionally, automated devices can increase the precision of material handling
operations. These systems are made to carry out repeated activities precisely, lower-
ing the possibility of mistakes and enhancing data accuracy (Arshad etal. 2021).
P. Saikiran etal.

121
5.4.5 Reduced Costs
Modern material handling techniques can also aid in cost-cutting for companies
(Zaman etal. 2022). Because they require less manual effort to complete tasks,
automated devices can lower labour expenses (Arvind and Gunasekaran 2014).
5.5 Limitations ofNew-Age Material Handling
Even though material handling advancements have many advantages, they also have
signicant limitations (Björnsson etal. 2018). The necessary initial investment, the
possibility of technology failure and the disappearance of the need for labour are
only a few of the drawbacks (Denis etal. 2020).
5.6 Utilisation ofArtificial Intelligence inSolid Oral
Dosage Forms
The practice of simulating human intellect with computers is known as articial
intelligence (AI). In 1956, Marvin Minsky and John McCarthy hosted a symposium
where the idea was rst put out (Hassanzadeh etal. 2019). Technology adoption
may reduce costs and save time while also improving understanding of formulation
and process characteristics (Agrawal 2018). Previously, AI was only used in the
eld of engineering, but more recently AI has become crucial in a number of
pharmacy- related elds, along with drug discovery, the development of drug deliv-
ery formulations, marketing, management, quality management, hospital pharmacy,
etc. (Grof and Štěpánek 2021). In the creation of drug delivery formulations, differ-
ent articial neural networks (ANNs), including deep neural networks (DNNs) and
recurrent neural networks (RNNs), are used (Elbadawi etal. 2021a). Then again, de
novo design encourages the development of much newer medicinal compounds that
possess the desirable characteristics (Das etal. 2021). The pharmaceutical market is
dominated by solid dosage forms (Shaikh etal. 2018). Tablets are thought to make
up the majority of solid dosage forms and account for more than two thirds of the
worldwide market (Xiouras etal. 2022). AI may be used to create improved formu-
lations, which would be extremely benecial to the pharmaceutical sector (Lou
etal. 2019). Four phases make up a typical AI workow: data gathering and prepa-
ration, AI modelling, simulation, testing and implementation (McCarthy et al.
2006). Implementing algorithms and seeing patterns in data to aid decision-making
is known as machine learning, a branch of AI (Catania 2021), articial neural net-
works (ANNs). Compared to traditional machine learning algorithms, ANNs (arti-
cial neural networks) drew inspiration from the biological neuronal structure of
human brains that provide superior computational and predictive power (Wang
etal. 2021b). Additionally, deep learning has been extensively employed for several
applications, including image classication, object recognition, image segmenta-
tion, natural language processing (NLP) and medical image analysis (Elbadawi
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms

122
etal. 2021b). Since it has been used so frequently in the pharmaceutical sector,
AI-based drug development is viewed as a potentially effective alternative to the
traditional approach (Bannigan etal. 2021). The framework known as ‘Pharma 4.0’
aims to address several persistent problems in the pharmaceutical manufacturing
industry by using modern digital methodologies (Nagy etal. 2019). In 2021, the US
FDA released the ‘Articial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan’ with the goal of adjusting regu-
latory oversight and enabling the enhancement of patient lives (Wang etal. 2022).
Solid dosage forms are the most signicant form of dosage forms in pharma eld,
and over 50% of new molecular entities (NMEs) are being accounted repeatedly
according to the Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (FDA CDER), because of its several advantages, which include shelf sta-
bility, patient adherence, simplicity of transportation and exact dosing
(Suryadinata 2017).
5.6.1 Widely Used Databases
Obtaining a database is the initial stage in executing an AI-based study. A high-
quality database must rst be created in order to properly create a workable formu-
lation development model (Liu etal. 2020). There are various traditional methods
for creating a modelling database with analytical techniques like the Design of
Experiment (DOE) tool (Zhao etal. 2019). Scientists can identify the connection
between many elements and reactions using the organised approach known as
Design of Experiments (DOE) (Lee etal. 2022). They may also ascertain how vari-
ous components interact and maximise the response (Palo etal. 2021).
5.6.2 Methods forProcessing Data
Before creating the models, researchers must process the raw data they have
obtained from public resources or internal experimental ndings (Dong etal. 2021).
To adapt and then evaluate the data, it is important to employ several extensively
used techniques, such as data cleaning, dimension reduction, unbalanced data solu-
tions and data splitting (Han et al. 2019). The removal of data points and their
replacement with mean and median values are two ways to clean up data (Hesse
etal. 2021). One more essential step in data processing is data partitioning (Mak
and Pichika 2019). The entire data set will normally be separated into three sub-
groups using this methodology: training, validation and evaluation. Consequently,
prior to performing modelling tasks, data processing and splitting procedures are
required (Vamathevan etal. 2019).
P. Saikiran etal.

123
5.6.3 Development ofSolid Dosage Forms Using AI Algorithms
In recent times, a variety of AI-based approaches have been effectively used in the
creation of pharmacological solid dosage forms. Articial intelligence (AI) is a
combination of information technology, data analysis and mathematics (Shah etal.
2019). Combining computer science, data analytics and mathematics generates arti-
cial intelligence (Paul etal. 2021). ML is a branch of AI that is often divided into
three categories: supervised learning, unsupervised learning and reinforcement
learning (Aksu etal. 2012). A method known as ‘deep learning’ comprises of out-
put/target variables that will be estimated from a collection of input variables
(Castro etal. 2021). Throughout the training process, a relation of the input vs.
intended output will be developed, resulting in the accuracy level that is wanted
(Shaheen 2021). Solid dose formulations have been generated using a variety of
deep learning techniques, including decision tree, logistic regression, linear regres-
sion, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM and support
vector (Ma etal. 2020). Unsupervised machine learning is an algorithm that con-
trols just the input variables and uses feature-nding and grouping techniques (Patel
and Shah 2022). A branch of machine learning called deep learning (DL) uses
cutting- edge algorithms like convolutional neural networks to learn from a signi-
cant quantity of experimental data (van der Lee and Swen 2023). In order to make
predictions, deep learning algorithms introduce a very complex model structure. In
recent decades, deep learning (DL) algorithims, aresuccessfully being used in phar-
maceutical eld for different purposes indevelopment ofa solid oral dosage formu-
lation (Fig.5.2).
Fig. 5.2 AI algorithms used for process optimisation of oral dosage forms
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms

124
5.6.4 Evaluation andExplainability ofModel
Predictive Performance
Assessment of the models’ predicting abilities is required following the machine
learning modelling procedure (Shaheen 2021). We may categorise the measures
used to evaluate the predicted accuracy into regression metrics and categorisation
metrics (Khanna etal. 2020). The coefcient of determination (R
2
), mean squared
error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) are
often used metrics for evaluation of regression modelling assignments (Moingeon
etal. 2022). A confusion matrix will be used to construct various metrics, such as
accuracy, precision and recall, for classication modelling work initially. However,
in the process of unbalanced classication modelling, the outcomes of several clas-
sication metrics, such as accuracy, are deceptive (Floresta etal. 2022). As a result,
new assessment measures including Cohen’s kappa, receiving operating character-
istic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) are used to evaluate models (Lowe
etal. 2022).
5.6.5 Applications ofArtificial Intelligence (AI) inSolid
Dosage Forms
5.6.5.1 Tablets
The most important oral solid dose form is a tablet. A tablet is often created by
compression or moulding and contains a combination of APIs and excipients (Lou
etal. 2019). Excipients are substances added to tablets to promote tableting perfor-
mance. Examples include lubricants, glidants, binders, diluents, sweeteners, food
colouring and drug release modiers which all serve to improve aesthetics and dis-
integrants and sustain release polymer coating (Lamberti etal. 2019).
5.6.5.2 Predicting Drug Release
During the development of a product, two of the most important preclinical trials
are drug release studies, including invitro and invivo tests (Dropka and Holena
2020). Important material properties and critical processing variables have an
impact on medication release patterns. For instance, little adjustments to the com-
paction parameters, such as pressure and tablet shape, or other elements, like drug
loading, may have a big impact on dissolving rates (Elbadawi etal. 2021b). In addi-
tion, specialised apparatuses such as UV-visible spectrophotometers and USP-
approved vessels are needed for a typical invitro drug release investigation (Wirtz
etal. 2019).
5.6.5.3 Developing 3D-Printed Tablets Using Artificial
Intelligence (AI)
One of the most cutting-edge methods for customised medicine is three- dimensional
(3D) printing, which has the capacity to create tablets taking patients’ physiology,
genetic proles and pharmacological responses into account (Boobier etal. 2020).
P. Saikiran etal.

125
Individualised 3D-printed tablets have been created using a variety of techniques,
including fused lament manufacturing, binder jetting and selective laser sintering
(SLS) (Duch etal. 2007). AI technologies have enormous potential to be imple-
mented into this approach and discover the design window in order to improve the
3D printing process and decrease the test effort with many variables.
5.6.5.4 Detecting Tablet Defects
During the production process, it is normal for tablets to exhibit aws including
cracking, capping, binding and sticking. These damaged tablets often need to be
ltered out manually, which calls for a sizable workforce and is difcult to scale up.
X-ray computed tomography (XRCT) (Doerr and Florence 2020), for instance, can
be utilised to analyse the interior structure of tablets in order to x this problem.
Researchers have effectively detected tablet faults by combining XRCT with the
deep learning approach to broaden the use of this technology.
5.6.5.5 Granules
Another pharmaceutical solid dose formulation made up of aggregation of powder
particles containing medicines and excipients is called granules. Granules are more
shelf-stable than liquid formulations and provide variable dosing for people who
have problems inswallowing pills or capsules (Zhao etal. 2021).Articial intelli-
gence techniques were used to assess and anticipate the medicine contents in sugar-
free granules (Jiang etal. 2022). In this work, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy rst
showed that it was possible to determine the amount of medication in granules. The
drug remaining was then predicted using several machine learning techniques using
the near-infrared (NIR) spectrums. This proves the drug content in granules may be
quantied using AI models, which are acceptable tools for doing so (Grof and
Štěpánek 2021).
5.7 Continuous Manufacturing Technology
The technique of making medicinal items constantly, without breaks or stops in the
assembly line, is known as continuous manufacturing technology of solid oral dos-
age forms (Rogers etal. 2013). This strategy is distinct from conventional batch
manufacturing, which involves creating medicinal items in large batches and then
placing them through additional processing procedures (Lee etal. 2015).
The continuous manufacturing (CM) approach, in contrast, has been effectively
utilised for many years in the petrochemical, food, consumer goods and automotive
industries to increase production productivity and save costs (O’Connor etal. 2016).
In a batch mode, raw materials are loaded into a single-system operation after which
the process is performed at approved parameters until the predetermined endpoint is
reached (Hock etal. 2021). Until all standards of quality are satised and the mate-
rial may be moved to the following unit process, these intermediates are momen-
tarily kept in the warehouse (Myerson etal. 2015). For steady-state processing, a
constant hold-up mass must be present in the system, and this must be done while
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms

126
the same ow rate is constantly used to remove the nal goods from the process (Yu
et al. 2014). A traditional manufacturing process for pharmaceutical products is
made up of several independent unit operations such as high shear granulation,
tableting, drying and blending (Haimhoffer etal. 2021). The unit activities are all
combined into a single production train in an integrated continuous manufacturing
process, without breaks or starts between units of work (Fig.5.3) (Rathore etal.
2015). Recalls due to poor product quality have led to medicine shortages (Nambiar
etal. 2022). These quality problems were frequently brought on by out-of-date pro-
duction techniques and tools as well as a shortage of efcient quality control proce-
dures (Burcham et al. 2018). In addition to advancing technology, including
high-quality medications into products throughout development will strengthen
process capabilities (Poechlauer etal. 2013). The ICH (International Conference on
Harmonisation) Q8 denes QBD (quality by design) as a systematic method of
product development that starts with predetermined goals and places a signicant
emphasis on product/process understanding and control systems as a solid scientic
basis for quality risk management (Welch etal. 2017). Establishing clinically appli-
cable standards is a key goal of QBD (quality by design), i.e. relevant standards for
product quality that are focused on ensuring clinical efcacy (Balogh etal. 2018).
Secondly, a more capable process will result in less variation in the nal output,
which will lower the prevalence of aws (Thabet etal. 2018).
5.7.1 Overcoming Obstacles toContinuous Manufacturing
When it comes to combining unit activities into a single continuous process train,
the pharmaceutical sector has been somewhat cautious. A number of obstacles still
need to be overcome before continuous manufacturing (CM) becomes a preferred
and widely utilised technology platform throughout the industry (Medendorp
etal. 2020).
Fig. 5.3 Overview of batch and continuous manufacturing technology of solid oral dosage form
P. Saikiran etal.

127
5.7.1.1 Regulatory Uncertainties
For many years, the regulatory setting tended to restrict any modications made to
medicinal products after their approval (Srai etal. 2015). This contributed to a
mindset whereby batch procedures were still seen as the only viable option, despite
missed possibilities to accelerate the manufacture and release cycle (Srai et al.
2020). The FDA’s innovative technology team is willing to support the development
of this ground-breaking technology by engaging in early and participatory talks
with the organisation while creating a continuous manufacturing (CM) process
(Nasr etal. 2017). Process validation is the gathering and assessment of data from
the method design stage to commercial operations that creates scientic proof that
a process is capable of reliably producing high-quality products (Matsuda 2018).
5.7.1.2 Process Automation Technologies (PAT)
Most process automation technology (PAT) applications used nowadays in tablet
secondary manufacture are based on NIR (near-infrared) or Raman spectroscopy,
since these methods do not require sample preparation and provide quick, nonde-
structive assessments of physical and chemical characteristics (Fig.5.4) (O’Connor
et al. 2016). Both NIR (near-infrared) and Raman spectroscopies are molecular
spectrometric methods, yet they complement one another since they detect func-
tional groups in molecules differently (Allison etal. 2015). NIR (near infrared)
is more sensitive to polar bonds and asymmetric vibrations, whereas Raman
spectrometry is especially effective for examining nonpolar bonds and symmetric
vibrations (Esmonde-White etal. 2022). Raman spectroscopy has a lower limit-
of-detection than NIR spectroscopy. The most common problem for in-line
monitoring for NIR (near-infrared) and Raman spectroscopy is low detection
sensitivity (De Beer etal. 2011). Nevertheless, it should be considered that NIR
(near-infrared) and Raman spectrometry detection sensitivities are extremely
formulation dependent.
Fig. 5.4 Utilisation of PAT tools for optimisation of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
