Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5441_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Preformulation Studies
- •1.2.1 Solubility
- •1.2.2 Partition Coefficient
- •1.3.2 Parenteral Dosage Forms
- •1.3.3 Oral Dosage Form
- •1.3.4 Transdermal Dosage Form
- •1.3.5 Inhalational Formulation
- •1.3.6 Nasal Formulations
- •1.3.7 Ophthalmic Dosage Form
- •1.4 Scale-Up Studies
- •1.4.1 Pilot Plant
- •1.4.2 Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)
- •1.2.4 Bulk Properties
- •1.3 Prototype Development
- •1.4.3 Regulatory Approval
- •1.5 Commercialisation
- •1.5.1.5 Life Cycle Extension Strategies
- •1.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.1.2 Product Specification
- •2.1.3.1 In-Process Specification
- •2.1.3.2 Release Specification
- •2.1.3.3 Shelf Life Specification
- •2.1.4 Specification Design
- •2.1.5 Specification Justification
- •2.2.3 ICH Q6A Guideline
- •2.2.3.1 Objective
- •2.2.3.2 New Drug Product
- •2.2.3.3 New Drug Substance
- •2.2.3.4 Universal Tests
- •2.2.3.5 Specific Tests
- •2.2.4 ICH Q6B Guideline
- •2.2.4.1 Scope
- •2.2.4.2 Specifications
- •2.2.5.1 Q8(R2): Structure—Parent Guideline (Knight 2014)
- •2.2.5.1.1 Pharmaceutical Development: Introduction
- •Drug Substances
- •Excipients
- •2.2.5.1.3 Drug Product
- •Formulation Development
- •Overages
- •2.2.5.1.4 Manufacturing Process Development
- •2.2.5.1.5 Container Closure System
- •2.2.5.1.6 Microbiological Attributes
- •2.2.5.1.7 Compatibility
- •2.2.5.2 Q8(R2): Structure—Annex
- •2.2.5.2.1 Introduction
- •Quality Target Product Profile
- •Critical Quality Attributes (CQA)
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Drug Substance-Related Information
- •2.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.3.1 Factorial Designs (FD)
- •3.3.2 Fractional Factorial Designs (FFDs)
- •3.3.3 Plackett–Burman Designs (PBDs)
- •3.3.4 Central Composite Designs (CCD)
- •3.3.5 Box–Behnken Designs (BBD)
- •3.3.6 Equiradial Designs
- •3.3.7 Mixture Designs
- •3.3.8 Taguchi Designs
- •3.3.9 Optimal Designs
- •3.4.1 Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)
- •3.4.2 Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
- •3.4.3 Risk Management
- •3.4.4 Design Space
- •3.4.5 Control Strategy
- •3.6.2 Constraint-Based Optimization
- •3.6.3 Multi-objective Optimization
- •3.6.4 Expert Systems
- •3.6.5 Evolutionary Algorithms
- •3.9.1 Design-Expert
- •3.9.2 SIMCA
- •3.9.3 Minitab
- •3.9.4 JMP
- •3.9.5 MATLAB
- •3.9.6 Aspen Plus
- •3.9.7 AutoCAD
- •3.10.1 Pharmaceutical Industry
- •3.10.2 Food Industry
- •3.10.3 Chemical Industry
- •3.10.4 Biotechnology Industry
- •3.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.3.1.1 Fillers/Diluents
- •4.3.1.2 Binders
- •4.3.2.2 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.3 Sweeteners
- •4.3.2.4 pH Adjusters
- •4.3.2.5 Preservatives
- •4.3.2.6 Surfactant
- •4.3.2.7 Suspending Agent
- •4.3.2.8 Emulsifying Agent
- •4.3.2.9 Colorants
- •4.3.2.10 Viscosity Modifiers
- •4.3.3.1 Penetration Enhancers
- •4.3.3.2 Solvents/Solubilisers
- •4.3.3.3 Adhesives
- •4.3.3.5 Plasticisers
- •4.3.4.1.1 Bulking Agents
- •4.3.4.1.2 Lyoprotectants
- •4.3.4.1.3 Antioxidants
- •4.3.4.1.4 Buffering Agents
- •4.3.4.2.1 Buffers
- •4.3.4.2.2 Preservatives
- •4.3.4.2.3 Tonicity Adjusters
- •4.3.4.2.4 Solvent System
- •4.3.4.2.5 Solubilisers
- •4.4.1 Physical Incompatibilities
- •4.4.2 Chemical Incompatibilities
- •4.3.1.3 Disintegrants
- •4.3.1.5 Coating Agents
- •4.3.1.8 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.1 Vehicles
- •4.4.3 Therapeutic or Physiological Incompatibilities
- •4.6 Related Regulatory Perspectives
- •4.6.1 GRAS
- •4.6.2 IIG
- •4.6.3 IPEC
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Binders
- •5.2.1.1 Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)
- •5.2.1.2 LYCATAB
- •5.2.1.3 GalenIQ (Isomalt)
- •5.2.2 Disintegrants
- •5.2.3 Lubricants
- •5.2.4 Co-processed Excipients
- •5.2.4.2 COMBILOSE
- •5.2.4.3 PEARLITOL CR-H
- •5.2.4.4 PROSOLV EASYtab SP (Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose)
- •5.3 New-Age Material Handling Techniques Developed
- •5.3.1 Automated Dispensing System
- •5.3.1.1 Unit Dose Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.2 Centralised Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.3 Robotic Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.2 Vacuum Conveying Systems
- •5.3.3 Flexible Screw Conveyors
- •5.4.1 Automation
- •5.4.2 Enhanced Safety
- •5.4.3 Higher Productivity
- •5.4.4 Enhanced Accuracy
- •5.4.5 Reduced Costs
- •5.6.1 Widely Used Databases
- •5.6.5.1 Tablets
- •5.6.5.2 Predicting Drug Release
- •5.6.5.4 Detecting Tablet Defects
- •5.6.5.5 Granules
- •5.7 Continuous Manufacturing Technology
- •5.7.1.1 Regulatory Uncertainties
- •5.7.1.2 Process Automation Technologies (PAT)
- •5.7.1.3 Equipment
- •5.7.1.5 Modern Process Control Techniques
- •5.8.1 Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
- •5.8.1.1 Process Variables
- •5.8.2 Applications
- •5.8.2.1 Stereolithography (SLA)
- •5.8.2.2 Printing Dosage Forms
- •5.8.3.1 Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)
- •5.8.3.3 Drawbacks
- •5.8.4.1 On-Demand Manufacturing
- •5.8.4.2 Improved Quality Dosage Forms
- •5.9 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Excipients
- •6.2.1 Superdisintegrants
- •6.2.3 Lubricants/Anti-adherents
- •6.2.4 Solubility/Dissolution Enhancers
- •6.2.5 Drug Release Rate Modifiers
- •6.2.6 Co-processed Excipients
- •6.3.1 Advanced Granulation Approaches
- •6.4 Process Automation
- •6.4.2 Fundamental Process Control Instruments
- •6.4.2.2 Rotary Tablet Press
- •6.5.1 Capping
- •6.5.2 Lamination
- •6.5.3 Chipping
- •6.5.4.1 Double Impression
- •6.6 Tablet Coating
- •6.6.1 Sugar Coating
- •6.6.2 Film Coating
- •6.7.1 Electrostatic Coating
- •6.7.2 Aqueous Film Coating Technology
- •6.7.3 Supercell Coating Technology (SCT)
- •6.7.4 Magnetically Assisted Impaction Coating (MAIC)
- •6.7.5 Dip Coating
- •6.7.6 Vacuum Film Coating
- •6.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Tablet Dosage Form
- •7.3 Global Market Analysis
- •7.4.1 Organ-Targeted Tablets
- •7.4.2 Modified Release Tablets
- •7.4.3 Miscellaneous
- •7.4.3.1 Chewable Tablets
- •7.4.3.2 Effervescent Tablets
- •7.4.3.3 Orodispersible Tablets
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Theoretical Considerations
- •8.2.1 Interfacial Properties
- •8.2.1.1 Surface Free Energy
- •8.2.1.2 Surface Potential
- •8.2.2 Electric Double Layer (EDL)
- •8.2.4 Wetting
- •8.2.5 Electrokinetic Phenomena
- •8.2.6 DLVO Theory
- •8.3.1 Flocculated Suspension
- •8.3.2 Deflocculated Suspension
- •8.4 Pharmaceutical Suspension Stability Study
- •8.4.1 Particle Settling
- •8.4.2 Particle Aggregation
- •8.4.3 Particle Growth (Ostwald Ripening)
- •8.5.3 Redispersibility
- •8.5.4 Flow Rate (F)
- •8.5.5 Viscosity Determination
- •8.5.8 Temperature Effect
- •8.5.9 Drug Content
- •8.5.10 In Vitro Dissolution Studies
- •8.5.11 Zeta Potential
- •8.5.14 Density
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.1 Macroemulsion
- •9.2.2 Microemulsion
- •9.2.3 Nanoemulsion
- •9.2.4 Pickering Emulsion
- •9.3.2 Surface Tension Theory
- •9.3.3 Molecular Adsorption Theory
- •9.3.4 Oriented Wedge Theory
- •9.4 Formulation
- •9.4.1.1 Dry Gum Method
- •9.4.1.2 Wet Gum Method
- •9.4.1.3 Bottle Method
- •9.4.1.4 In Situ Soap Method
- •9.4.1.5 Phase Titration Method
- •9.4.1.6 Phase Inversion Temperature Method
- •9.4.1.7 Spontaneous Emulsification
- •9.5 Stability
- •9.5.1 Gravitational Separation
- •9.5.1.1 Creaming
- •9.5.1.2 Sedimentation
- •9.5.1.3 Flocculation
- •9.5.2 Non-gravitational Separation
- •9.5.2.1 Coalescence
- •9.5.2.2 Droplet Aggregation
- •9.5.2.3 Ostwald Ripening
- •9.5.2.4 Phase Inversion
- •9.6 Evaluation
- •9.6.1 Macroscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.2 Microscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.3 Droplet Size Analysis
- •9.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •10.2.2 Antioxidants
- •10.2.3 Buffers
- •10.2.4 Vitamins
- •10.2.4.1 Vitamin B Complex
- •10.2.4.2 Vitamin C
- •10.2.4.3 Vitamin D
- •10.2.5 Electrolytes
- •10.2.6 Sodium
- •10.2.7 Potassium
- •10.2.8 Calcium
- •10.2.9 Magnesium
- •10.2.10 Chloride
- •10.2.12 Manganese
- •10.2.13 Selenium
- •10.2.14 Amino Acids
- •10.2.15 Carbohydrates
- •10.2.16 Dextrose
- •10.2.17 Lipids
- •10.3.1 Nutritional Support
- •10.3.2 Role of Parentral Admixture in Nutritional Deficiencies
- •10.3.3 Therapeutic Benefits
- •10.4.1.2 Aseptic Techniques
- •10.4.1.3 Dosing Considerations
- •10.5.1.1 FDA Guidelines
- •10.5.1.2 EMA Standards
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.1 Drug Solubility
- •11.2.2 Drug Stability
- •11.2.3 Skin Irritation
- •11.3 Manufacturing Challenges
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1.3 Corneal Tissue Compatibility
- •12.2.1.4 Isotonicity
- •12.2.1.6 Viscosity (Appropriate Rheological Properties)
- •12.3.1 In Situ Gelling System
- •12.3.2 Mucoadhesives
- •12.3.4 Ophthalmic Nano-Suspensions
- •12.3.6 Therapeutic Contact Lenses
- •12.3.7 Ocular Inserts
- •12.4.1 Corneal Tissue Bioprinting
- •12.4.2 Contact Lens
- •12.4.3 Drug Delivery
- •12.6.1 Physical Appearance
- •12.6.2 Identification
- •12.6.3 Assay
- •12.6.4 Impurities
- •12.6.6 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •12.6.7 Bacterial Endotoxins
- •12.6.9 Sterility Test
- •12.6.10 Osmolarity
- •12.6.11 Ocular Irritation
- •12.6.12 Isotonicity Evaluation
- •12.6.13 Stability Study
- •12.6.14 pH
- •12.6.15 Viscosity
- •12.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 Improved Dissolution Rate by Surface Area Enlargement
- •13.3.1 Top-Down Approaches
- •13.3.1.1 Wet Bead Milling
- •13.3.1.2 Evaporation/Condensation
- •13.3.1.3 High-Pressure Homogenization
- •13.3.1.4 Laser Ablation
- •13.3.1.5 Ultrasound
- •13.3.2 Bottom-Up Approaches
- •13.3.2.1 Precipitation
- •13.3.2.2 Sol-Gel
- •13.3.2.4 Liquid Antisolvent Precipitation
- •13.3.2.5 Precipitation Assisted by Acid-Base Method
- •13.3.2.6 High Gravity-Controlled Precipitation
- •13.3.2.7 Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Method
- •13.3.2.8 Emulsion Polymerization Method
- •13.3.3 Combinative Technology
- •13.3.3.1 Nano Edge Technology
- •13.3.3.2 Smart Crystal Technology
- •13.4.2 SEM
- •13.4.3 TEM
- •13.4.4 AFM
- •13.4.6 Zeta Potential
- •13.4.7 DSC
- •13.4.8 XRD
- •13.4.9 FTIR
- •13.4.10 Raman Spectroscopy
- •13.4.11 TGA
- •13.4.12 Permeation Study
- •13.5.1 Oral Delivery
- •13.5.2 Parenteral Administration
- •13.5.3 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •13.5.4 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •13.5.5 Topical Drug Delivery
- •13.5.6 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Device-Related Challenges
- •14.2.2 Biological Barriers
- •14.3.1 Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1 Conventional Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.1 Jet Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.2 Ultrasonic Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.1 Mesh Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.2 Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer (VMN)
- •14.3.2 Dry Powder Inhalers
- •14.3.2.2.1 Active Devices
- •14.3.2.2.2 Digital/Smart Devices
- •14.3.3 Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)
- •14.3.3.1.2 Extra-Fine Particle Atomization
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2.1 Herbal Nanoemulsion
- •15.2.2 Herbal Nanoparticles
- •15.2.3 Herbal Hydrogels
- •15.4.1 Thermal Analysis
- •15.4.2 High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)
- •15.4.3 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •15.4.4 Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS)
- •15.4.5 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
- •15.4.6 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GCMS)
- •15.4.7 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy
- •15.5.1 Physical Instability
- •15.5.2 Environmental Conditions
- •15.5.3 Chemical Instability
- •15.5.4 Complex Mixtures
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Approaches
- •16.3.1 Phenotypic Screening
- •16.3.2 Target-Based Methods
- •16.3.3 Knowledge-Based Methods
- •16.3.4 Signature-Based Methods
- •16.3.5 Pathway or Network-Based Methods
- •16.3.6 Targeted Mechanism-Based Methods
- •16.3.7 Pharmacovigilance-Based Drug Repurposing
- •16.4 Virtual Screening (VS)
- •16.4.1 Molecular Docking
- •16.4.2 Ligand-Based Virtual Screening (LBVS)
- •16.4.3 Pharmacophore Modelling
- •16.4.4 Similarity Searching
- •16.4.5 Machine Learning (ML)
- •16.4.6 Structure Based
- •16.4.7 Molecular Dynamics Studies
- •16.4.8 Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR)
- •16.4.9.1.1 AutoDock
- •16.4.9.1.2 Chimera
- •16.4.9.1.3 Discovery Studio
- •16.4.9.1.4 Dock
- •16.4.9.1.5 MolDock
- •16.4.9.1.6 Argus Lab
- •16.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Pre-clinical Evaluations
- •17.2.1 In Vitro Pharmacological Studies
- •17.2.2 In Vivo Toxicity Studies
- •17.2.3 In Vivo Efficacy Studies
- •17.3 Clinical Evaluations
- •17.3.1 Clinical Trial Phases
- •17.3.1.1 Phase 0
- •17.3.1.2 Phase I
- •17.3.1.3 Phase II
- •17.3.1.4 Phase III
- •17.4 Pharmacovigilance
- •17.4.2 Clinical Trial Designs
- •17.4.3 Randomized Controlled Trials
- •17.4.3.1 Parallel Arm Design
- •17.4.3.2 Cross-Over Design
- •17.4.3.3 Randomized Withdrawal Design
- •17.4.3.4 Factorial Design
- •17.4.4.1 Stratified Randomization
- •17.4.4.2 Block Randomization
- •17.4.4.3 Cluster Randomization
- •17.5 Pharmacogenomics
- •17.5.1 Pharmacokinetic Gene Variation
- •17.5.2 Pharmacodynamics Gene Variation
- •17.7 Conclusions
- •References

108
Kamba EA, Itodo AU, Ogah E (2013) Utilization of different emulsifying agents in the prepara-
tion and stabilization of emulsions. Int J Mater Chem 3(4):69–74. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.
ijmc.20130304.01
Kim MK, Zhao H, Lee CH, Kim DD (2001) Formulation of a reservoir-type testosterone transdermal
delivery system. Int J Pharm 219(1–2):51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 5173(01)00631- 7
Kumar P, Verma M (2023) Pharmaceutical suspensions: an updated patent review on novel sus-
pending agents and recent advancement. Recent Adv Drug Deliv Formul 17(3):193–209.
https://doi.org/10.2174/0126673878246149231010085610
Kusuma SA, Abdassah MA, Maryati FI (2020) Comparison of preservatives efcacy of benzalko-
nium chloride, thimerosal, and benzyl alcohol in eye drop products containing chlorampheni-
col. Int J Appl Pharm 12:100–105. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2020v12i4.37686
Lake JA, Adams SD (2008) Chemical additives to make polymeric materials biodegradable.
US8513329B2
Lee JY, An J, Chua CK (2017) Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials.
Appl Mater Today 7:120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004
Li J-X, Carlin B, Ruszkay T (2007) Co-processed microcrystalline cellulose and sugar alcohol as
an excipient for tablet formulations. US8932629B2
Li J, Wang Y, Yu D (2023) Effects of additives on the physical stability and dissolution of poly-
meric amorphous solid dispersions: a review. AAPS PharmSciTech 24(7):175. https://doi.
org/10.1208/s12249- 023- 02622- 8
Liu N, Xiao J, Zang LH, Quan P, Liu DC (2023) Preparation of trans-crocetin with high sol-
ubility, stability, and oral bioavailability by incorporation into three types of cyclodextrins.
Pharmaceutics 15(12):2790. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15122790
Malaquias LF, Schulte HL, Chaker JA, Karan K, Durig T, Marreto RN, Gratieri T, Gelfuso GM,
Cunha-Filho M (2018) Hot melt extrudates formulated using design space: one simple process
for both palatability and dissolution rate improvement. J Pharm Sci 107(1):286–296. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2017.08.014
Manchanda S, Chandra A, Bandopadhyay S, Deb PK, Tekade RK (2018) Formulation
additives used in pharmaceutical products: emphasis on regulatory perspectives and GRAS.
In: Dosage form design considerations, pp 773–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978- 0- 12-
814423- 7.00022- 8
Mandadapu G, Kolli P, Kurra VG (2022) Formulation & evaluation of cyclodextrin complexed
tablets by enhancing the dissolution rate. J Innov Appl Pharm Sci 8:123–132. https://doi.
org/10.37022/jiaps.v7i3.375
Mašková E, Kubová K, Raimi-Abraham BT, Vllasaliu D, Vohlídalová E, Turánek J, Mašek J
(2020) Hypromellose—a traditional pharmaceutical excipient with modern applications in
oral and oromucosal drug delivery. J Control Release 324:695–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jconrel.2020.05.045
Mehmood Y, Farooq U (2015) Excipients use in parenteral and lyophilized formulation develop-
ment. Open Sci J Pharm Pharmacol 3(3):19–27
Mishra A, Sinha VR, Sharma S, Mathew AT, Kumar R, Yadav AK (2023) A comprehensive com-
patibility study of ganciclovir with some common excipients. Am J Biopharm Pharm Sci 3:2.
https://doi.org/10.25259/AJBPS_4_2023
Mitrevej A, Hollenbeck RG (1983) Inuence of hydrophilic excipients on the interaction of aspirin
and water. Int J Pharm 14(2–3):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378- 5173(83)90097- 2
Nakmode D, Bhavana V, Thakor P, Madan J, Singh PK, Singh SB, Rosenholm JM, Bansal KK,
Mehra NK (2022) Fundamental aspects of lipid-based excipients in lipid-based product devel-
opment. Pharmaceutics 14(4):831. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14040831
Narang AS, Mantri RV, Raghavan KS (2017) Excipient compatibility and functionality. In:
Developing solid oral dosage forms. Academic, pp151–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978- 0
- 12- 802447- 8.00006- 6
Nema S, Brendel RJ (2011) Excipients and their role in approved injectable products: current
usage and future directions. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 65(3):287–332. https://doi.org/10.5731/
pdajpst.2011.00634
M. Patel etal.

109
Pan X, Lenka S, Davis J, Nagapudi K, Mantik P, Saggu M, Dai L, Cadang L, Zhang HM, Zhang
J, Izadi S (2023) Probing the protein–excipient interaction in the orally delivered protein by
solid-state hydrogen–deuterium exchange mass spectrometry and molecular dynamics. Anal
Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c04255
Panakanti R, Narang AS (2015) Impact of excipient interactions on drug bioavailability from solid
dosage forms. In: Excipient applications in formulation design and drug delivery. Springer,
pp273–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 319- 20206- 8_10
Parekh BV, Saddik JS, Patel DB, Dave RH (2023) Evaluating the effect of glidants on tablet stick-
ing propensity of ketoprofen using powder rheology. Int J Pharm 635:122710. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122710
Pérez M, Carou D, Rubio EM, Teti R (2020) Current advances in additive manufacturing. Proc
CIRP 88:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.076
Pichayakorn W, Suksaeree J, Boonme P, Amnuaikit T, Taweepreda W, Ritthidej GC (2012)
Nicotine transdermal patches using polymeric natural rubber as the matrix controlling system:
effect of polymer and plasticizer blends. J Membr Sci 411:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
memsci.2012.04.017
Pilgaonkar PS, Rustomjee MT, Gandhi AS, Bhumbra VS (2003) Pharmaceutical excipient.
US20040228932A1
Pramanick S, Singodia D, Chandel V (2013) Excipient selection in parenteral formulation devel-
opment. Pharma Times 45(3):65–77
Rajabalaya R, Tor LQ, David S (2012) Formulation and invitro evaluation of ondansetron hydro-
chloride matrix transdermal systems using ethyl cellulose/polyvinyl pyrrolidone polymer
blends. Int J Pharmacol Pharm Sci 6(12):667–671
Rayaprolu BM, Strom JG (2013) Design and evaluation of D-α tocopheryl polyethylene glycol
1000 succinate emulsied poly-ϵ-caprolactone nanoparticles for protein/peptide drug delivery.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm 39(7):1046–1052. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2012.699069
Rayaprolu BM, Strawser JJ, Anyarambhatla G (2018) Excipients in parenteral formulations: selec-
tion considerations and effective utilization with small molecules and biologics. Drug Dev Ind
Pharm 44(10):1565–1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2018.1483392
Rojek B, Wesolowski M (2023) A combined differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravim-
etry approach for the effective assessment of drug substance-excipient compatibility. J Therm
Anal Calorim 148(3):845–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973- 022- 11849- 9
Rojek B, Gazda M, Plenis A (2023) FTIR, Raman spectroscopy and HT-XRD in compatibility study
between naproxen and excipients. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2013:123048.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2023.123048
Rosiaux Y, Jannin V, Hughes S, Marchaud D (2014) Solid lipid excipients—matrix agents
for sustained drug delivery. J Control Release 188:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jconrel.2014.06.004
Sakdiset P, See GL, Sawatdee S, Yoon AS (2023) Preparation and characterization of lidocaine
HCl-loaded proniosome gels with skin penetration enhancers. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol
86:104639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104639
Sanchez BS, Fernandez PI, Badiola I, Marquez J (2017) Novel vehicles for the transfection of
miRNAs. EP3441074A1
Saokham P, Muankaew C, Jansook P, Loftsson T (2018) Solubility of cyclodextrins and drug/
cyclodextrin complexes. Molecules 23(5):1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051161
Sharma A (2019) Effect of residual reactive impurities in excipients on the stability of pharmaceu-
tical products. In: Innovative dosage forms: design and development at early stage, pp91–118.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527812172.ch3
Sherwood BE, Hunter EA, Staniforth JH (1995) Pharmaceutical excipient having improved com-
pressibility. US5585115A
Sista HS, Espinoza YJ (2017) Excipients for use in adeno-associated virus pharmaceutical formu-
lations and pharmaceutical formulations made therewith. US20180055939A1
Snipes WC (1988) Low-melting moldable pharmaceutical excipient and dosage forms prepared
therewith. US5004601A
4 Pharmaceutical Product Development: Formulation Additives

110
Soni N, Soni N, Pandey H, Maheshwari R, Kesharwani P, Tekade RK (2016) Augmented deliv-
ery of gemcitabine in lung cancer cells exploring mannose anchored solid lipid nanoparticles.
J Colloid Interface Sci 481:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.020
Vadlamudi MK, Dhanaraj S (2017) Signicance of excipients to enhance the bioavailability of
poorly water-soluble drugs in oral solid dosage forms: a review. In: IOP conference series:
materials science and engineering, vol 263(2), p022023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/
263/2/022023
Van Gessel AW (2010) Co-processed tablet excipient composition its preparation and use.
US20130177649A1
Varshosaz J, Ghassami E, Ahmadipour S (2018) Crystal engineering for enhanced solubility and
bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Curr Pharm Des 24(21):2473–2496. https://doi.org/
10.2174/1381612824666180712104447
Velip L, Dhiman V, Kushwah BS, Samanthula G (2023) Characterization of degradation prod-
ucts and drug–excipient interaction products of erdatinib by LC–Q-TOF-MS/MS and
NMR.Chromatographia 86(8–9):627–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337- 023- 04268- x
Veronica N, Heng PW, Liew CV (2022) Ensuring product stability—choosing the right excipients.
J Pharm Sci 111(8):2158–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2022.05.001
Xie XY, Chang ZY, Chen CL, Zhang L, Wang M, Tang C, Xue HR, Gao XL (2023) Physicochemical
characterization of three active pharmaceutical ingredients for compound glycyrrhizin solid
formulation and compatibility analysis via thermal and non-thermal techniques. J Pharm Innov
18(2):485–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247- 022- 09656- 8
Zarmpi P, Flanagan T, Meehan E, Mann J, Fotaki N (2017) Biopharmaceutical aspects and impli-
cations of excipient variability in drug product performance. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 111:1–5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.11.004
M. Patel etal.

111
5
Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid
Dosage Forms
P.Saikiran, T.PawanKumar, ShristiArya, DarshanaTijare,
SohamLoharkar, GopalBajad, DeepankarBahuguna,
PawanDevangan, AtulMourya,
HarithasreeVeerabromma, ChantibabuKatta,
andJitenderMadan
Abstract
The pharmaceutical and healthcare industries are constantly moving through a
period of unmatched changes. Oral administration of solid dosage forms is one
of the most preferred route and is highly patient compliant as well as stable when
compared to other dosage forms. However, the challenge of transition from a
traditional manufacturing approach to continuous automated processing
approach remains unmet. Continuous modications in materials and manufac-
turing technologies are gradually being implemented in the industry to avail the
benets related to process automation, improved quality and reduced costs.
Therefore, it is well accepted that there is a growing demand to discover alterna-
tive processes and design formulation strategies that can signicantly improve
powder processing techniques, granulation methods and equipment to ensure
safe, reproducible and quality products are manufactured. The intended chapter
presents an overview of the state-of-the-art research equipment, material han-
dling techniques, process analytical technique implementation and 3D printing
application strategies. It covers recent advances in techniques and processes at
every stage of pharmaceutical product development and methods employed to
troubleshoot the processing hurdles.
Keywords
Oral route of administration · Solid dosage form · Materials and manufacturing ·
3D printing
P. Saikiran · T. PawanKumar · S. Arya · D. Tijare · S. Loharkar · G. Bajad · D. Bahuguna ·
P. Devangan · A. Mourya · H. Veerabromma · C. Katta · J. Madan (
*)
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research,
Hyderabad, Telangana, India

112
5.1 Introduction
In the vast landscape of pharmaceutical formulations, conventional oral solid dos-
age forms hold a signicant place as one of the most commonly utilised and acces-
sible means of drug administration (Zhang etal. 2004). These solid preparations,
designed to be swallowed and dissolved in the gastrointestinal tract, have played a
crucial role in the treatment of various diseases and ailments. Furthermore, the pop-
ularity of conventional oral solid dosage forms can be attributed to their ease of
administration, allowing patients to self-administer medications conveniently with-
out the need for specialised medical procedures.
Various kinds of oral solid dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, lozenges,
powders, granules and many other formulations are used for the delivery of active
pharmaceutical ingredients (API) (Arshad etal. 2021). Tablets can be further cate-
gorised into immediate release (compressed tablets), extended release, chewable,
effervescent, sublingual, buccal, enteric-coated, dispersible, scored and lm-coated
tablets, each serving specic therapeutic purposes (Lachman et al. 1976). Film-
coated tablets are compressed tablets that are coated with a thin layer of lm. These
coatings have become the rst choice of formulators due to advances in material
science and polymer chemistry (Almoazen and Felton 2013). Enteric-coated/func-
tionalised coated tablets are compressed tablets, coated with substances that resist
dissolution in gastric uid but disintegrate in the intestine (Maderuelo etal. 2019).
A layer or lm made out of water-soluble materials is the main idea behind capsule
development which surrounds drug or active API, hence rendering it odourless,
tasteless, elegant and easy to swallow. There are presently two main types of cap-
sules, viz. hard gelatin and soft gelatin capsules (soft shells) (Hoag 2017). Soft shell
capsules (soft gels) are typically used to encapsulate non aqueous liquid and semi-
solid formulations, and hard shell capsules are used to encapsulate both solid and
nonaqueous formulations (Gullapalli and Mazzitelli 2017). Pellets are dosage forms
similar to tablets and capsule which can be prepared by different types of novel
techniques. They are small solid substances composed of highly puried active
ingredient with or without excipient (Kurbanoglu etal. 2017).
Despite many advantages offered by conventional dosage forms, they often suf-
fer from some major limitations like low bioavailability, repeated dosing, peripheral
adverse effects and lack of patient compliance (Lafeur and Keckeis 2020). Lack of
targeted action, premature decomposition of drugs and uctuations in plasma drug
concentrations are the extended limitations of oral solid dosage forms. For very
potent medicines, the precise dosing may be difcult or impossible with conven-
tional dosage forms (Adepu and Ramakrishna 2021). Solubility, which ultimately
affects the bioavailability of the medicinal product and results in less effective
action, is a major problem associated with oral solid dosage forms. A complex chain
of physicochemical, biological, physiological and anatomical factors acting inde-
pendently and in concert with each other to limit drug bioavailability is a major
obstacle to successful oral administration (Boyd etal. 2019). Another barrier to the
administration of medicinal products orally is inadequate absorption and rst-pass
P. Saikiran etal.

113
metabolism, which has an effect on the amount of drugs reaching systemic circula-
tion necessary for their therapeutic efcacy (Devadasu etal. 2018).
To overcome the limitations associated with conventional dosage form, we need
advanced technologies. The major aim of the drug delivery system is to liberate the
substance at the correct time in an adequate concentration on a target site (Lafeur
and Keckeis 2020). In addition, novel raw materials have been used to improve
manufacturability and functionality. The development of additive manufacturing
technology, 3D printing medical devices, which offer key advantages over tradi-
tional drug delivery systems, has gained increasing popularity. The ability to pro-
duce 3D structures that are custom designed and have a complex architecture is of
paramount importance, as well as easy access to personalised medicines (Wang
etal. 2021a). Automated medication system helps to minimise errors in drug admin-
istration process, and along with this it is cost-effective (Risør etal. 2017). Articial
intelligence (AI), which helps to increase the quality of a product and assist in its
optimisation, is emerging as an important tool for pharmaceutical industry (Khanna
etal. 2020). Process analytical technology (PAT) is an indispensable tool for imple-
menting quality by design (QbD), enabling effective process parameter monitoring
and the fabrication of nished pharmaceuticals of the highest standard. The devel-
opment of analytical QbD techniques facilitates the development of an appropriate
control plan to govern the analytical method, hence reducing variability and enhanc-
ing robustness in method performance with exceptional quality (Haneef and Beg
2021). Real-time release testing (RTRt) of the product is made possible when a
thorough understanding of the process is combined with the application of quick
and precise analytical sensors. To do this, identify the product’s critical quality attri-
butes (CQA), followed by the critical process parameters (CPP) and the critical
material attributes (CMA), all of which have a big impact on the CQAs (Galata
etal. 2021).
Progress of machine design over the years has led to the development of continu-
ous manufacturing technologies which increases productivity by application of
PAT.The intended chapter aims to summarise recent advances in the eld of oral
solid dosage forms highlighting key aspects of novel excipients used in its manufac-
turing. It throws light upon the utilisation of AI and 3D printing in solid oral dos-
age form.
5.2 Novel Excipients Involved inManufacturing ofOral
Solid Dosage Form
Pharmaceutical excipients are components used in the manufacturing process or
included in the dosage form of a nal pharmaceutical product but are not pharma-
cologically active drugs or prodrugs. The word excipient is derived from the Latin
word excipere, meaning ‘to except’, which is simply described as ‘other than’ (van
der Merwe etal. 2020). Excipients can make up to 80–90% of the formulation of a
drug product and are vital to the formulation of drug products because they provide
for the efcient distribution of therapeutic ingredients. A pharmaceutical excipient
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms

114
being inert offers many functions and is used to increase the bulk of medicament
during its formulation, improve product’s precision as well as API dose accuracy,
increase bioavailability and nally produce a more palatable nal pharmaceutical
form, with increased patient acceptance (Fig.5.1) (Abrantes etal. 2016).
Chemically modied excipients are categorised as novel excipients which can be
listed in inactive ingredient database (IID). Single-component excipients may not
always offer the necessary performance to enhance the formulation characteristics
for proper manufacturing of some active pharmaceutical compounds (Chaudhari
et al. 2012). Formulation scientists have an increasing number of co-processed
excipients introduced into the market. New approaches for enhancing excipient
functionality include new combinations of presently used excipients (van der Merwe
et al. 2020), e.g. binders, disintegrants, sweeteners, colorants and co-processed
excipients.
5.2.1 Binders
Pharmaceutical binders are designed to produce a product with the appropriate ow
qualities. These components employed to give the powder ingredients a specic
shape and size (Kar etal. 2019). Binders are applied to the powders to improve the
ow qualities of the powdered raw material by reducing surface area and increasing
cohesiveness (Allenspach et al. 2020). They are obtained from natural origin
(starch), semisynthetic origin (hydroxyl ethyl cellulose) and synthetic origin (povi-
done). Now a days, different grades of binders are introduced that have more
advanced properties such as better drug release and controlled pharmacokinetics
than conventional forms.
Fig. 5.1 Conventional excipients used in the manufacture of pharmaceutical solid oral dosage form
P. Saikiran etal.

115
5.2.1.1 Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)
HPMC is used in a direct compression process or for continuous production. HPMC
exhibits poor ow for which new grades of direct compression HPMC have been
created. Three distinct novel direct compression (DC) grades of HPMC were used
to improve ow properties (K4M, K15M and K100M). Physical characteristics,
bioadhesive strength, buoyancy lag time, swelling index and invitro drug release
studies were assessed for the prepared tablets (Pittu and Sharma 2013).
5.2.1.2 LYCATA B
These are pregelatinised starches, which are often analysed with around 30% cws.
Conventionally, starch has limitations of low cold water solubility (Elballa and
Salih 2022). Pregelatinised starch obtained from Roquette is water dispersible and
acts as suitable binder.
5.2.1.3 GalenIQ (Isomalt)
GalenIQ (isomalt) is one of the most multi-functional water-soluble ller and binder
that has low hygroscopicity and is available in different pharmaceutical grades
based on solubility. It can be milled to desired particle size for preparing solid oral
dosage forms. It can be a mixture of D-sorbitol and D-mannitol suitable for a direct
compression process. It possesses excellent owability, negligible sticking to tablet-
ing tools and a very good compatibility. It is widely used in pharmaceutical prepara-
tions for coating of oral dispersible tablets and capsules.
5.2.2 Disintegrants
Disintegrants are chemical substances or mixtures of chemicals that are added to a
drug formulation to help break down or disintegrate the contents of tablets or cap-
sules into smaller pieces which would likely dissolve more quickly than they would
otherwise. Superdisintegrants are a new class of agents that are added to improve
dissolution and disintegration properties of dosage form in less than 30s, thereby
enhancing drug release absorption (e.g. croscarmellose, sodium starch glycolate)
(Desai etal. 2016).
Modied nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) is a novel pharmaceutical excipient
which acts as a super disintegrant. It has been derivatised from microcrystalline cel-
lulose (MCC) via cross-linking process. Structural characteristics, such as low
porosity, cause unnecessary swelling, which restricts pharmaceutical applications
of MCC. However, NCC has better biocompatibility, biodegradability, low cost,
nontoxic and possesses characteristics such as large specic surface area, high ten-
sile strength, stiffness and lightweight (Sheikhy etal. 2021). Malic acid used as a
cross-linking agent reacts with NCC polymer to form double bond cross-linker. In
the graft copolymer nanocrystalline cellulose-poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-
co- itaconic acid) as modied NCC, it was hypothesised that adding hydrophilic
itaconic acid (IA) and relatively more hydrophobic poly (2-hydroxy-ethyl
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms

116
methacrylate) (PHEMA), HEMA, as co-monomers, may improve the HLB and
increase swelling property.
5.2.3 Lubricants
Lubricants are used to attain uniform tableting force distribution and tablet density
distribution. These are utilised to reduce friction between the particles or tablets and
the die-hole wall (Miller and York 1988). This allows the compressed tablet to be
pushed out of the die-hole smoothly while also requiring lesser force and wearing
down less frequently. Sodium stearyl fumarate is a relatively new lubricant and
comparatively less hydrophobic than stearic acid. It imparts lesser effect on tablet
disintegration and has higher ability to lessen friction and adhesion to the punches.
The particle size of sodium stearyl fumarate was more important, as it is an alterna-
tive to magnesium stearate. It is generally nontoxic and nonirritant material and can
be included in IID in a concentration range of 0.2–0.5% (de Backere etal. 2022).
5.2.4 Co-processed Excipients
Co-processing is an appealing method for enhancing the material properties of
APIs, which can be done at the point of API isolation. The pharmaceutical industry
is becoming more and more interested in continuous manufacturing techniques
(Stocker etal. 2023).
5.2.4.1 Kollitab™ DC 87L
It is a new all-in-one tableting excipient material with four characteristics such as
binder, ller, disintegrant and lubricant. It enables quick tablet disintegration, offers
greater owability and produces high tablet strength while using a wide range of
compression strengths (both low and high), eases formulation procedures and
decreases the complexity of production.
5.2.4.2 COMBILOSE
Lactose is the primary pharmaceutical diluent in solid oral dosage forms. Hence,
lactose’s inadequate compressibility and ow characteristics prevent it from being
used as a direct compressible ller and binder (Somnache etal. 2023). Maltose
monohydrate 10%, maize starch and lactose monohydrate 20:1 were all processed
together using co-freezing and co-drying techniques which has the potential to offer
improved dilution capability and compressibility with less susceptibility to
lubricants.
5.2.4.3 PEARLITOL CR-H
PEARLITOL formulations are used for modern direct compression techniques.
PEARLITOL
®
CR-H is a co-processed blend of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
(HPMCK4M) (70%) and D-mannitol (30%) that enables the controlled release of
P. Saikiran etal.

117
active medicinal ingredients, with excellent functional characteristics that improve
tablet processibility, such as owability (Jin etal. 2023).
5.2.4.4 PROSOLV EASYtab SP (Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose)
It is a multifunctional homogenous lubricant-coated co-processed excipient com-
posite. It is ready-to-use material comprising of four individual components such as
silicied MCC, colloidal silicon dioxide, sodium starch glycolate and sodium stea-
ryl fumarate which is a binder-ller, glidant, super disintegrant and a lubricant,
respectively (Darzuli etal. 2019). These components maintain their chemical identi-
ties while synergistically providing increased functional performance (Buckton
etal. 1999). Utilisation of PROSOLV EASYtab SP has the potential of increasing
protability through cost savings brought by increased productivity, less setup and
cleaning costs, improved yield and reduced loss.
5.3 New-Age Material Handling Techniques Developed
In the pharmaceutical sector, particularly when producing solid oral dosage forms,
material management is crucial (American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
2006). Throughout the production process, material handling comprises transpor-
tation, storage, management and protection of raw materials, completed items and
other things (Steenweg etal. 2021). The efcacy and efciency of material han-
dling operations signicantly affect the cost, lead time and quality of the nal
product (Jagtap et al. 2022). New-generation material handling solutions have
emerged in recent years as a result of technological breakthroughs in material han-
dling, offering various advantages over conventional methods (Arshad etal. 2021).
Oral solid dosage forms are taken orally and then absorbed in gastrointestinal tract
to provide a localised therapeutic impact in the mouth, throat, digestive tract or
systemic action in the body (Goodin etal. 2011). APIs and acceptable excipients
can be milled, dried, encapsulated, mixed, granulated or tableted to create oral
solid dosage forms. Due to its simplicity and resulting patient compliance, a vari-
ety of solid oral dosage forms, including tablets, capsules, lozenges, powders and
granules, have already been used effectively for conveying API (Ng etal. 2022).
Some of the most well- liked and thoroughly researched areas of oral solid dosage
form development include tablet formulations that offer a unit dose which is either
immediate drug release, modulated release or taste-masked (Finke and Kwade
2021). In order to create durable tablet dosage forms, quality by design (QBD)-
based formulation methodological approaches are often used to decrease variation
in processes. In order to enhance the functioning and manufacturability of tablet
formulations, new raw ingredients were also used (Jagtap etal. 2022). New Age
Material Handling Methods 1. Automated dispensing systems, 2. Vacuum convey-
ing systems, 3. Flexible screw conveyors.
5 Advances inPharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
