Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5441_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Preformulation Studies
- •1.2.1 Solubility
- •1.2.2 Partition Coefficient
- •1.3.2 Parenteral Dosage Forms
- •1.3.3 Oral Dosage Form
- •1.3.4 Transdermal Dosage Form
- •1.3.5 Inhalational Formulation
- •1.3.6 Nasal Formulations
- •1.3.7 Ophthalmic Dosage Form
- •1.4 Scale-Up Studies
- •1.4.1 Pilot Plant
- •1.4.2 Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)
- •1.2.4 Bulk Properties
- •1.3 Prototype Development
- •1.4.3 Regulatory Approval
- •1.5 Commercialisation
- •1.5.1.5 Life Cycle Extension Strategies
- •1.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.1.2 Product Specification
- •2.1.3.1 In-Process Specification
- •2.1.3.2 Release Specification
- •2.1.3.3 Shelf Life Specification
- •2.1.4 Specification Design
- •2.1.5 Specification Justification
- •2.2.3 ICH Q6A Guideline
- •2.2.3.1 Objective
- •2.2.3.2 New Drug Product
- •2.2.3.3 New Drug Substance
- •2.2.3.4 Universal Tests
- •2.2.3.5 Specific Tests
- •2.2.4 ICH Q6B Guideline
- •2.2.4.1 Scope
- •2.2.4.2 Specifications
- •2.2.5.1 Q8(R2): Structure—Parent Guideline (Knight 2014)
- •2.2.5.1.1 Pharmaceutical Development: Introduction
- •Drug Substances
- •Excipients
- •2.2.5.1.3 Drug Product
- •Formulation Development
- •Overages
- •2.2.5.1.4 Manufacturing Process Development
- •2.2.5.1.5 Container Closure System
- •2.2.5.1.6 Microbiological Attributes
- •2.2.5.1.7 Compatibility
- •2.2.5.2 Q8(R2): Structure—Annex
- •2.2.5.2.1 Introduction
- •Quality Target Product Profile
- •Critical Quality Attributes (CQA)
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Drug Substance-Related Information
- •2.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.3.1 Factorial Designs (FD)
- •3.3.2 Fractional Factorial Designs (FFDs)
- •3.3.3 Plackett–Burman Designs (PBDs)
- •3.3.4 Central Composite Designs (CCD)
- •3.3.5 Box–Behnken Designs (BBD)
- •3.3.6 Equiradial Designs
- •3.3.7 Mixture Designs
- •3.3.8 Taguchi Designs
- •3.3.9 Optimal Designs
- •3.4.1 Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)
- •3.4.2 Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
- •3.4.3 Risk Management
- •3.4.4 Design Space
- •3.4.5 Control Strategy
- •3.6.2 Constraint-Based Optimization
- •3.6.3 Multi-objective Optimization
- •3.6.4 Expert Systems
- •3.6.5 Evolutionary Algorithms
- •3.9.1 Design-Expert
- •3.9.2 SIMCA
- •3.9.3 Minitab
- •3.9.4 JMP
- •3.9.5 MATLAB
- •3.9.6 Aspen Plus
- •3.9.7 AutoCAD
- •3.10.1 Pharmaceutical Industry
- •3.10.2 Food Industry
- •3.10.3 Chemical Industry
- •3.10.4 Biotechnology Industry
- •3.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.3.1.1 Fillers/Diluents
- •4.3.1.2 Binders
- •4.3.2.2 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.3 Sweeteners
- •4.3.2.4 pH Adjusters
- •4.3.2.5 Preservatives
- •4.3.2.6 Surfactant
- •4.3.2.7 Suspending Agent
- •4.3.2.8 Emulsifying Agent
- •4.3.2.9 Colorants
- •4.3.2.10 Viscosity Modifiers
- •4.3.3.1 Penetration Enhancers
- •4.3.3.2 Solvents/Solubilisers
- •4.3.3.3 Adhesives
- •4.3.3.5 Plasticisers
- •4.3.4.1.1 Bulking Agents
- •4.3.4.1.2 Lyoprotectants
- •4.3.4.1.3 Antioxidants
- •4.3.4.1.4 Buffering Agents
- •4.3.4.2.1 Buffers
- •4.3.4.2.2 Preservatives
- •4.3.4.2.3 Tonicity Adjusters
- •4.3.4.2.4 Solvent System
- •4.3.4.2.5 Solubilisers
- •4.4.1 Physical Incompatibilities
- •4.4.2 Chemical Incompatibilities
- •4.3.1.3 Disintegrants
- •4.3.1.5 Coating Agents
- •4.3.1.8 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.1 Vehicles
- •4.4.3 Therapeutic or Physiological Incompatibilities
- •4.6 Related Regulatory Perspectives
- •4.6.1 GRAS
- •4.6.2 IIG
- •4.6.3 IPEC
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Binders
- •5.2.1.1 Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)
- •5.2.1.2 LYCATAB
- •5.2.1.3 GalenIQ (Isomalt)
- •5.2.2 Disintegrants
- •5.2.3 Lubricants
- •5.2.4 Co-processed Excipients
- •5.2.4.2 COMBILOSE
- •5.2.4.3 PEARLITOL CR-H
- •5.2.4.4 PROSOLV EASYtab SP (Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose)
- •5.3 New-Age Material Handling Techniques Developed
- •5.3.1 Automated Dispensing System
- •5.3.1.1 Unit Dose Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.2 Centralised Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.3 Robotic Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.2 Vacuum Conveying Systems
- •5.3.3 Flexible Screw Conveyors
- •5.4.1 Automation
- •5.4.2 Enhanced Safety
- •5.4.3 Higher Productivity
- •5.4.4 Enhanced Accuracy
- •5.4.5 Reduced Costs
- •5.6.1 Widely Used Databases
- •5.6.5.1 Tablets
- •5.6.5.2 Predicting Drug Release
- •5.6.5.4 Detecting Tablet Defects
- •5.6.5.5 Granules
- •5.7 Continuous Manufacturing Technology
- •5.7.1.1 Regulatory Uncertainties
- •5.7.1.2 Process Automation Technologies (PAT)
- •5.7.1.3 Equipment
- •5.7.1.5 Modern Process Control Techniques
- •5.8.1 Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
- •5.8.1.1 Process Variables
- •5.8.2 Applications
- •5.8.2.1 Stereolithography (SLA)
- •5.8.2.2 Printing Dosage Forms
- •5.8.3.1 Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)
- •5.8.3.3 Drawbacks
- •5.8.4.1 On-Demand Manufacturing
- •5.8.4.2 Improved Quality Dosage Forms
- •5.9 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Excipients
- •6.2.1 Superdisintegrants
- •6.2.3 Lubricants/Anti-adherents
- •6.2.4 Solubility/Dissolution Enhancers
- •6.2.5 Drug Release Rate Modifiers
- •6.2.6 Co-processed Excipients
- •6.3.1 Advanced Granulation Approaches
- •6.4 Process Automation
- •6.4.2 Fundamental Process Control Instruments
- •6.4.2.2 Rotary Tablet Press
- •6.5.1 Capping
- •6.5.2 Lamination
- •6.5.3 Chipping
- •6.5.4.1 Double Impression
- •6.6 Tablet Coating
- •6.6.1 Sugar Coating
- •6.6.2 Film Coating
- •6.7.1 Electrostatic Coating
- •6.7.2 Aqueous Film Coating Technology
- •6.7.3 Supercell Coating Technology (SCT)
- •6.7.4 Magnetically Assisted Impaction Coating (MAIC)
- •6.7.5 Dip Coating
- •6.7.6 Vacuum Film Coating
- •6.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Tablet Dosage Form
- •7.3 Global Market Analysis
- •7.4.1 Organ-Targeted Tablets
- •7.4.2 Modified Release Tablets
- •7.4.3 Miscellaneous
- •7.4.3.1 Chewable Tablets
- •7.4.3.2 Effervescent Tablets
- •7.4.3.3 Orodispersible Tablets
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Theoretical Considerations
- •8.2.1 Interfacial Properties
- •8.2.1.1 Surface Free Energy
- •8.2.1.2 Surface Potential
- •8.2.2 Electric Double Layer (EDL)
- •8.2.4 Wetting
- •8.2.5 Electrokinetic Phenomena
- •8.2.6 DLVO Theory
- •8.3.1 Flocculated Suspension
- •8.3.2 Deflocculated Suspension
- •8.4 Pharmaceutical Suspension Stability Study
- •8.4.1 Particle Settling
- •8.4.2 Particle Aggregation
- •8.4.3 Particle Growth (Ostwald Ripening)
- •8.5.3 Redispersibility
- •8.5.4 Flow Rate (F)
- •8.5.5 Viscosity Determination
- •8.5.8 Temperature Effect
- •8.5.9 Drug Content
- •8.5.10 In Vitro Dissolution Studies
- •8.5.11 Zeta Potential
- •8.5.14 Density
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.1 Macroemulsion
- •9.2.2 Microemulsion
- •9.2.3 Nanoemulsion
- •9.2.4 Pickering Emulsion
- •9.3.2 Surface Tension Theory
- •9.3.3 Molecular Adsorption Theory
- •9.3.4 Oriented Wedge Theory
- •9.4 Formulation
- •9.4.1.1 Dry Gum Method
- •9.4.1.2 Wet Gum Method
- •9.4.1.3 Bottle Method
- •9.4.1.4 In Situ Soap Method
- •9.4.1.5 Phase Titration Method
- •9.4.1.6 Phase Inversion Temperature Method
- •9.4.1.7 Spontaneous Emulsification
- •9.5 Stability
- •9.5.1 Gravitational Separation
- •9.5.1.1 Creaming
- •9.5.1.2 Sedimentation
- •9.5.1.3 Flocculation
- •9.5.2 Non-gravitational Separation
- •9.5.2.1 Coalescence
- •9.5.2.2 Droplet Aggregation
- •9.5.2.3 Ostwald Ripening
- •9.5.2.4 Phase Inversion
- •9.6 Evaluation
- •9.6.1 Macroscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.2 Microscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.3 Droplet Size Analysis
- •9.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •10.2.2 Antioxidants
- •10.2.3 Buffers
- •10.2.4 Vitamins
- •10.2.4.1 Vitamin B Complex
- •10.2.4.2 Vitamin C
- •10.2.4.3 Vitamin D
- •10.2.5 Electrolytes
- •10.2.6 Sodium
- •10.2.7 Potassium
- •10.2.8 Calcium
- •10.2.9 Magnesium
- •10.2.10 Chloride
- •10.2.12 Manganese
- •10.2.13 Selenium
- •10.2.14 Amino Acids
- •10.2.15 Carbohydrates
- •10.2.16 Dextrose
- •10.2.17 Lipids
- •10.3.1 Nutritional Support
- •10.3.2 Role of Parentral Admixture in Nutritional Deficiencies
- •10.3.3 Therapeutic Benefits
- •10.4.1.2 Aseptic Techniques
- •10.4.1.3 Dosing Considerations
- •10.5.1.1 FDA Guidelines
- •10.5.1.2 EMA Standards
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.1 Drug Solubility
- •11.2.2 Drug Stability
- •11.2.3 Skin Irritation
- •11.3 Manufacturing Challenges
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1.3 Corneal Tissue Compatibility
- •12.2.1.4 Isotonicity
- •12.2.1.6 Viscosity (Appropriate Rheological Properties)
- •12.3.1 In Situ Gelling System
- •12.3.2 Mucoadhesives
- •12.3.4 Ophthalmic Nano-Suspensions
- •12.3.6 Therapeutic Contact Lenses
- •12.3.7 Ocular Inserts
- •12.4.1 Corneal Tissue Bioprinting
- •12.4.2 Contact Lens
- •12.4.3 Drug Delivery
- •12.6.1 Physical Appearance
- •12.6.2 Identification
- •12.6.3 Assay
- •12.6.4 Impurities
- •12.6.6 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •12.6.7 Bacterial Endotoxins
- •12.6.9 Sterility Test
- •12.6.10 Osmolarity
- •12.6.11 Ocular Irritation
- •12.6.12 Isotonicity Evaluation
- •12.6.13 Stability Study
- •12.6.14 pH
- •12.6.15 Viscosity
- •12.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 Improved Dissolution Rate by Surface Area Enlargement
- •13.3.1 Top-Down Approaches
- •13.3.1.1 Wet Bead Milling
- •13.3.1.2 Evaporation/Condensation
- •13.3.1.3 High-Pressure Homogenization
- •13.3.1.4 Laser Ablation
- •13.3.1.5 Ultrasound
- •13.3.2 Bottom-Up Approaches
- •13.3.2.1 Precipitation
- •13.3.2.2 Sol-Gel
- •13.3.2.4 Liquid Antisolvent Precipitation
- •13.3.2.5 Precipitation Assisted by Acid-Base Method
- •13.3.2.6 High Gravity-Controlled Precipitation
- •13.3.2.7 Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Method
- •13.3.2.8 Emulsion Polymerization Method
- •13.3.3 Combinative Technology
- •13.3.3.1 Nano Edge Technology
- •13.3.3.2 Smart Crystal Technology
- •13.4.2 SEM
- •13.4.3 TEM
- •13.4.4 AFM
- •13.4.6 Zeta Potential
- •13.4.7 DSC
- •13.4.8 XRD
- •13.4.9 FTIR
- •13.4.10 Raman Spectroscopy
- •13.4.11 TGA
- •13.4.12 Permeation Study
- •13.5.1 Oral Delivery
- •13.5.2 Parenteral Administration
- •13.5.3 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •13.5.4 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •13.5.5 Topical Drug Delivery
- •13.5.6 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Device-Related Challenges
- •14.2.2 Biological Barriers
- •14.3.1 Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1 Conventional Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.1 Jet Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.2 Ultrasonic Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.1 Mesh Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.2 Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer (VMN)
- •14.3.2 Dry Powder Inhalers
- •14.3.2.2.1 Active Devices
- •14.3.2.2.2 Digital/Smart Devices
- •14.3.3 Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)
- •14.3.3.1.2 Extra-Fine Particle Atomization
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2.1 Herbal Nanoemulsion
- •15.2.2 Herbal Nanoparticles
- •15.2.3 Herbal Hydrogels
- •15.4.1 Thermal Analysis
- •15.4.2 High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)
- •15.4.3 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •15.4.4 Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS)
- •15.4.5 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
- •15.4.6 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GCMS)
- •15.4.7 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy
- •15.5.1 Physical Instability
- •15.5.2 Environmental Conditions
- •15.5.3 Chemical Instability
- •15.5.4 Complex Mixtures
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Approaches
- •16.3.1 Phenotypic Screening
- •16.3.2 Target-Based Methods
- •16.3.3 Knowledge-Based Methods
- •16.3.4 Signature-Based Methods
- •16.3.5 Pathway or Network-Based Methods
- •16.3.6 Targeted Mechanism-Based Methods
- •16.3.7 Pharmacovigilance-Based Drug Repurposing
- •16.4 Virtual Screening (VS)
- •16.4.1 Molecular Docking
- •16.4.2 Ligand-Based Virtual Screening (LBVS)
- •16.4.3 Pharmacophore Modelling
- •16.4.4 Similarity Searching
- •16.4.5 Machine Learning (ML)
- •16.4.6 Structure Based
- •16.4.7 Molecular Dynamics Studies
- •16.4.8 Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR)
- •16.4.9.1.1 AutoDock
- •16.4.9.1.2 Chimera
- •16.4.9.1.3 Discovery Studio
- •16.4.9.1.4 Dock
- •16.4.9.1.5 MolDock
- •16.4.9.1.6 Argus Lab
- •16.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Pre-clinical Evaluations
- •17.2.1 In Vitro Pharmacological Studies
- •17.2.2 In Vivo Toxicity Studies
- •17.2.3 In Vivo Efficacy Studies
- •17.3 Clinical Evaluations
- •17.3.1 Clinical Trial Phases
- •17.3.1.1 Phase 0
- •17.3.1.2 Phase I
- •17.3.1.3 Phase II
- •17.3.1.4 Phase III
- •17.4 Pharmacovigilance
- •17.4.2 Clinical Trial Designs
- •17.4.3 Randomized Controlled Trials
- •17.4.3.1 Parallel Arm Design
- •17.4.3.2 Cross-Over Design
- •17.4.3.3 Randomized Withdrawal Design
- •17.4.3.4 Factorial Design
- •17.4.4.1 Stratified Randomization
- •17.4.4.2 Block Randomization
- •17.4.4.3 Cluster Randomization
- •17.5 Pharmacogenomics
- •17.5.1 Pharmacokinetic Gene Variation
- •17.5.2 Pharmacodynamics Gene Variation
- •17.7 Conclusions
- •References

280
corneum (Baveja 2018). Sonophoresis is the application of various ultrasonic wave
frequencies to penetrate the skin’s protective layer and enhance drug diffusion
through the epidermis, hence enhancing medication penetration. Compared to high-
frequency ultrasound, low-frequency ultrasound improves medication penetration
more (Nguyen and Banga 2018; Park etal. 2019), but in iontophoresis molecules
are pushed into the skin using an electric eld (the repelling forces between simi-
larly charged molecules). For the delivery of both charged and uncharged mole-
cules, it delivers quick drug release (Park etal. 2019). However, since the models
are patient-specic, many of these potential solutions suffer challenges with cost
and large-scale applicability; to evaluate the long-term effects of any of the strate-
gies, greater depth of research and clinical trials are thus necessary.
11.4.2 Personalized Medicine Tailoring Topical andTransdermal
Dosage Forms toIndividual Patient Needs
The eld of personalized medicine, which aims to adapt medicines to a specic
individual by taking into account that person’s physiology, drug action, and genetic
prole, has the potential to revolutionize the healthcare industry. The primary tech-
nology driving this paradigm change from traditional “one-size-ts-all” care to per-
sonalized medicine is three-dimensional (3D) printing. A three-dimensional item is
created utilizing different computer software through the process of 3D printing,
one layer at a time. Using 3D printing, it is feasible to create a wide variety of phar-
maceutical dosage forms with different geometries, release proles, and drug com-
bination. Few of the main 3D printing technical platforms being investigated in the
pharmaceutical sector include stereolithography, selective laser sintering, inkjet
printing, fused lament fabrication, binder jetting, and pressure-assisted microsy-
ringe. In the future, this technology might be used in a clinical context where medi-
cations could be given based on patient needs. Creating products from three
dimensions is known as three-dimensional printing, commonly referred to as addi-
tive manufacturing or 3D printing. It involves depositing layers of material on top of
one another to gradually develop a solid structure. It utilizes CAD software to trans-
mit the required signals to a 3D printer, which converts the computerized digital
model into two-dimensional (2D) portions and creates solid layers to generate the
required objects (Vaz and Kumar 2021).
There is great role of technology in personalized medicines. Inkjet printing, in
general, refers to systems that employ pattern-generating tools to digitally direct
and position tiny liquid drops on a substrate. Continuous inkjet printers, as the name
suggests, continuously emit a ne mist of liquid droplets onto a substrate, even
when not explicitly necessary. This process involves introducing a pressure wave
into the ink supply, resulting in vibrations that break up the ink into consistently
sized droplets which are subsequently expelled from the nozzle. This technique has
been utilized for a considerable period of time due to its consistent emission of ink
droplets. While the advantage lies in the continuous creation of droplets, preventing
clogging of the nozzle, it is worth noting that drawbacks such as low resolution and
J. Kaur et al.

281
costly maintenance accompany this printing method (Vaz and Kumar 2021). In a
drop-on-demand inkjet printer, ink droplets are expelled only when necessary. The
printer typically has 100–1000 nozzles, and each nozzle is capable of independently
ejecting droplets onto the substrate. The trigger signal instructs the printhead to
release the droplets precisely where needed. This technology allows for precise con-
trol and efcient use of ink. In a thermal inkjet (TIJ) printer, thermal energy is used
as the trigger to release the ink droplets. Each nozzle in the printhead has a resistor
that heats up when triggered by an electric charge. This rapid heating causes the ink
to vaporize and form a bubble, which propels the droplet out of the nozzle onto the
substrate. The resistor then cools down, allowing the nozzle to be reloaded with ink
for the next droplet. The main disadvantage of thermal inkjet printers is the use of
high temperatures (around 200–300°C), which can potentially degrade thermola-
bile active compounds present in some inks. This limitation needs to be considered
when using thermal inkjet technology for sensitive applications (Vaz and Kumar
2021). In a piezoelectric inkjet printer, a piezoelectric element or actuator is used to
generate pressure and eject the ink droplets. When an electric voltage is applied to
the piezoelectric material, it changes its shape, exerting pressure on the ink reser-
voir. This pressure forces the ink out through the nozzle, forming a droplet onto the
substrate. Once the piezoelectric element returns to its original shape, the nozzle is
reloaded with ink, ready to be triggered again. This offers advantages such as pre-
cise control of ink droplet size and high-quality printing. They can also handle a
wider range of inks compared to thermal inkjet printers. However, they may be
more expensive and have more complex mechanisms (Alomari etal. 2015; Vadodaria
and Mills 2020). The ability to use less volatile and more biocompatible uids while
operating at room temperature is one of this method’s primary advantages (Acosta-
Vélez 2016; Acosta-Vélez and Wu 2016).
11.4.3 Benefits andChallenges ofDeveloping Combination
Therapies inTopical andTransdermal Formulations
Drug distribution via the skin is a fascinating and difcult eld. It has been both an
intriguing or difcult study topic. Modern technological advancements lead to the
transdermal delivery of various types of medications, including traditional hydro-
phobic small molecules, hydrophilic medications, and macromolecules. Because of
its clear advantages over alternative delivery methods, transdermal systems are a
preferred method of medication administration. Patients can administer themselves
conveniently and painlessly through transdermal delivery. Another advantage of
transdermal drug delivery is the ability to provide a sustained release of medication.
This is particularly useful for medications with a short half-life that would require
frequent dosing. By continuously releasing the drug through the skin, transdermal
systems can maintain a constant plasma level of the medication, resulting in more
effective and consistent therapy. Additional benet of transdermal distribution is
bypassing the gastrointestinal tract that may affect the absorption of medications.
The rst-pass effect can be eliminated, making it safer to provide less medication to
11 Challenges and Advances in Pharmaceutical Development of Topical…

282
hepato-compromised patients and reducing the adverse effect. On a monthly cost
basis, transdermal systems are often less expensive than other therapies since
patches are made to administer medications for 1–7days. The ability to give medi-
cations in numerous doses, on-demand, or at a variable rate is another benet of
transdermal administration. This feature enhances the advantages of traditional
patch dosage forms. The market for transdermal products is expanding, which fur-
ther demonstrates the extremely high level of patient acceptance of transdermal
therapies. The market for transdermal medication delivery, which was valued $12.7
billion in 2005, is anticipated to grow to $32 billion by 2015 (Paudel etal. 2010).
11.4.3.1 Case Studies andExamples ofCombination Therapies
ofTransdermal Patches andTopical Drug
Transdermal systems have predominantly focused on the patch dosage form, yet
there are alternative variations such as metered sprays like Evamist
®
, delivering
estradiol, or gel formulations like AndroGel
®
, delivering testosterone, which oper-
ate within the transdermal era. Technically, these newer transdermal gels can be
seen as a resurgence of the nitroglycerin ointment technology that was previously
approved. However, these updated formulations exhibit enhanced sensory proper-
ties and market appeal. Consequently, these technologies present a viable alterna-
tive to patch production, particularly for potent drug compounds, as they are highly
effective and cost-efcient. Furthermore, for the successful distribution of medica-
tion through transdermal patches, stability is a crucial consideration. With the pos-
sibility of patches containing volatile solvents or hygroscopic materials, appropriate
packaging becomes imperative (Paudel etal. 2010).
11.4.4 Continuous Monitoring andControlled Release
inTransdermal Drug Delivery System
The Internet of Things (IoT) plays a crucial role in smart medicine delivery systems
(Fig.11.1) by utilizing advanced technology to monitor and improve the effective-
ness of medicinal therapy. IoT-based drug delivery systems utilize various hard-
ware, sensors, and smart tools to monitor and evaluate a patient’s health parameters
in real time, leading to customized and targeted medicine therapy. These systems
employ devices of different sizes and types, such as wearable and implantable
devices like infusion pumps, smart pens, inhalers, and auto-injectors. However,
there are a number of difculties in developing and implementing IoT-based medi-
cine delivery systems, including condentiality and privacy of the data collected by
these devices, strict regulations and standards, and compatibility and reliabil-
ity issues.
11.4.4.1 Real-Time Monitoring andControl ofDrug Release
IoT-based medication transdermal delivery systems are becoming more common in
the healthcare industry as a result of their ability to improve drug delivery’s preci-
sion, efcacy, and efciency. Different techniques are used in medicine transdermal
J. Kaur et al.

283
delivery system to examine data, make wise judgments, and optimize therapy. In
systems like insulin administration for detecting diabetes, where data is continually
monitored and evaluated to determine right dosage form, closed-loop control algo-
rithms are utilized. Use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic algorithms can
improve dosage regimes and help in forecasting medication based pharmacokinetic
processes i.e. absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. Datasets are ana-
lyzed by automated algorithms to nd patterns or correlations that guide medicine
dose choices and improve treatment results. Effectiveness and safety of drug deliv-
ery systems are improved by these algorithms, which allow for customized dose
recommendation and modications (Raikar etal. 2023). Smart drug delivery sys-
tems have a great deal of promise of increasing medication adherence and reducing
the load of demanding regimens. By utilizing their connection and smooth data
Fig. 11.1 Categories of IoT-based system
11 Challenges and Advances in Pharmaceutical Development of Topical…

284
exchange capabilities, IoT-based systems provide special benets for smart medi-
cine administration. IoT sensors continually monitor medication delivery parame-
ters, patient responses, and ambient conditions with real-time monitoring and data
analytics, enabling quick intervention and improved treatment procedures (Raikar
etal. 2023). Healthcare practitioners may remotely monitor the condition of patients
due to remote access and connection, which makes them especially useful for tele-
medicine and the management of chronic diseases. Improved treatment outcome
and self-management are a result of enhanced patient engagement through mobile
apps and wearables (Saunders etal. 2019). The infrastructure enables integration
with healthcare systems, allowing smart drug delivery systems to adapt to new needs.
11.5 Conclusion andFuture Perspectives
Conclusion of pharmaceutical development of transdermal and topical dosage
forms presents several challenges and has witnessed signicant advances in recent
years. Key challenges include permeation barriers, limited drug load, and poor sta-
bility of active ingredients. However, advancements in technology and formulation
strategies have addressed some of these challenges. One of the notable advances is
the use of novel delivery systems such as nanoparticles, liposome, and micronee-
dles, which increase penetration of the drug through skin and improve their bio-
availability. These systems provide controlled release, increased drug loading
capacity, and improved stability. Furthermore, the development of sophisticated
invitro/in vivo models for evaluation of drug permeation and skin absorption has
facilitated the screening and selection of effective formulations. These models
mimic human skin properties and aid in predicting drug release and permeation
behavior. Another signicant advance is the incorporation of physical and chemical
penetration enhancers, which can disrupt the skin barrier and increase drug perme-
ation. These enhancers include hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds, as well as
techniques such as iontophoresis, sonophoresis, and microneedle-based intradermal
delivery. Moreover, the introduction of solubility-enhancement strategies, such as
cosolvency, complexation, and nano-emulsication, has improved the formulation
of poorly soluble drugs for transdermal and topical delivery. These approaches
enhance dissolution and solubility of the drugs, leading to improved drug release
and permeation. Despite the notable advancements, there are still areas of research
that need to be explored. Future studies should focus on developing novel strategies
to overcome skin permeation barriers, enhance drug loading capacity, and improve
stability of active ingredients. Additionally, the exploration of personalized medi-
cine and the development of custom-made transdermal and topical forms based on
individual patient needs hold immense potential. To conclude, the pharmaceutical
development of transdermal and topical forms has gradually progressed, along with
advancements in drug delivery systems, penetration enhancers, solubility-
enhancement strategies, and sophisticated evaluation models. These advances have
improved the efcacy and optimization of transdermal and topical system. Continued
J. Kaur et al.

285
research in this eld is expected to yield breakthroughs in overcoming the remain-
ing challenges and bringing transformative changes in development of transdermal
and topical delivery system.
References
Abouhussein DM (2021) Enhanced transdermal permeation of BCS class IV aprepitant using
binary ethosome: optimization, characterization and ex vivo permeation. J Drug Deliv Sci
Technol 61:102185
Acosta-Vélez GF (2016) 3D pharming: direct printing of personalized pharmaceutical tablets.
Polym Sci 2(1):1–10
Acosta-Vélez GF, Wu BM (2016) 3D pharming: direct printing of personalized pharmaceutical
tablets. Polym Sci 2(1):11
Alany R (2017) Topical and transdermal formulation and drug delivery. Pharm Dev Technol
22(4):457–457
Alomari M, Mohamed FH, Basit AW, Gaisford S (2015) Personalised dosing: printing a dose of
one’s own medicine. Int J Pharm 494(2):568–577
Apolinário AC, Hauschke L, Nunes JR, Lourenço FR, Lopes LB (2021) Design of multifunctional
ethosomes for topical fenretinide delivery and breast cancer chemoprevention. Colloids Surf A
Physicochem Eng Asp 623:126745
Barry BW (2012) Topical and transdermal drug delivery: principles and practice. Oxford
University Press
Baveja S (2018) Drug delivery: steps toward replacing the pill. Berkeley Sci J 22(2). https://doi.
org/10.5070/bs3222039588
Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK (2006) Dermal and transdermal drug delivery
systems: current and future prospects. Drug Deliv 13(3):175–187
Das Kurmi B, Tekchandani P, Paliwal R, Rai Paliwal S (2017) Transdermal drug delivery: oppor-
tunities and challenges for controlled delivery of therapeutic agents using nanocarriers. Curr
Drug Metab 18(5):481–495. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389200218666170222150555
Dehdashtian A, Stringer TP, Warren AJ, Mu EW, Amirlak B, Shahabi L (2018) Anatomy and phys-
iology of the skin. In: Riker A (ed) Melanoma. Springer, Cham, pp15–26
Domínguez-Hüttinger E, Ono M, Barahona M, Tanaka RJ (2013) Risk factor-dependent dynam-
ics of atopic dermatitis: modelling multi-scale regulation of epithelium homeostasis. Interface
Focus 3(2):20120090
Durga KN, Bhuvaneswari P, Hemalatha B, Padmalatha K (2022) A review on transdermal drug
delivery system. Asian J Pharm Technol 12(2):159–166
Farjami A, Salatin S, Jafari S, Mahmoudian M, Jelvehgari M (2021) The factors determining the
skin penetration and cellular uptake of nanocarriers: new hope for clinical development. Curr
Pharm Des 27(42):4315–4329
Ghezzi M, Pescina S, Padula C, Santi P, Del Favero E, Cantù L, Nicoli S (2021) Polymeric micelles
in drug delivery: an insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in bio-
relevant conditions. J Control Release 332:312–336
Ghosh TK, Ghosh A, Bishop M (2014) Topical dermatological drug delivery. Springer
Klang V, Matsko NB, Valenta C, Hofer F (2012) Electron microscopy of nanoemulsions: an essen-
tial tool for characterisation and stability assessment. Micron 43(23):85–103
Kováčik A, Kopečná M, Vávrová K (2020) Permeation enhancers in transdermal drug delivery:
benets and limitations. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 17(2):145–155
Maibach H, Wester RC (2013) Skin bioavailability and bioequivalence. J Control Release
171(3):605–608
11 Challenges and Advances in Pharmaceutical Development of Topical…

286
Makhmalzade BS, Chavoshy F (2018) Polymeric micelles as cutaneous drug delivery system in
normal skin and dermatological disorders. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 9(1):2
Nguyen HX, Banga AK (2018) Electrically and ultrasonically enhanced transdermal delivery of
methotrexate. Pharmaceutics 10(3):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10030117
Noel R, Finnin BC, Patel RR (2017) Adhesive transdermal delivery systems. In: Handbook of non-
invasive drug delivery systems: science and technology, vol 2. Elsevier, pp359–385
Park J, Lee H, Lim G-S, Kim N, Kim D, Kim Y-C etal (2019) Enhanced transdermal drug deliv-
ery by sonophoresis and simultaneous application of sonophoresis and iontophoresis. AAPS
PharmSciTech 20(3):96. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249- 019- 1309- z
Paudel KS, Milewski M, Swadley CL, Brogden NK, Ghosh P, Stinchcomb AL (2010) Challenges
and opportunities in dermal/transdermal delivery. Ther Deliv 1(1):109–131
Peña-Juárez MC, Guadarrama-Escobar OR, Escobar-Chávez JJ (2021) Transdermal delivery sys-
tems for biomolecules. J Pharm Innov 17:1–14
Phatale V, Vaiphei KK, Jha S, Patil D, Agrawal M, Alexander A (2022) Overcoming skin barriers
through advanced transdermal drug delivery approaches. J Control Release 351:361–380
Priya S, Desai VM, Singhvi G (2022) Surface modication of lipid-based nanocarriers: A potential
approach to enhance targeted drug delivery. ACS Omega 8(1):74–86
Rabiei M, Kashanian S, Samavati SS, Jamasb S, McInnes SJ (2020) Nanomaterial and advanced
technologies in transdermal drug delivery. J Drug Target 28(4):356–367
Rai VK, Mishra N, Yadav KS, Yadav NP (2018) Nanoemulsion as pharmaceutical carrier for der-
mal and transdermal drug delivery: formulation development, stability issues, basic consider-
ations and applications. J Control Release 270:203–225
Raikar AS, Kumar P, Raikar GV, Somnache SN (2023) Advances and challenges in IoT-based
smart drug delivery systems: a comprehensive review. Appl Syst Innov 6(4):62
Ramadon D, McCrudden MT, Courtenay AJ, Donnelly RF (2021) Enhancement strategies for trans-
dermal drug delivery systems: current trends and applications. Drug Deliv Transl Res 12:1–34
Sarheed O, Shouqair D, Ramesh KVRNS, Khaleel T, Amin M, Boateng J, Drechsler M (2020)
Formation of stable nanoemulsions by ultrasound-assisted two-step emulsication process for
topical drug delivery: effect of oil phase composition and surfactant concentration and lorata-
dine as ripening inhibitor. Int J Pharm 576:118952
Saunders A, Messer LH, Forlenza GP (2019) MiniMed 670G hybrid closed loop articial pancreas
system for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: overview of its safety and efcacy. Expert
Rev Med Devices 16(10):845–853
Sawnhey RR, Bahl D, Kansara K (2016) Stability issues in topical medications: a review. J Adv
Pharm Technol Res 7(2):44–53
Souto EB, Cano A, Martins-Gomes C, Coutinho TE, Zielińska A, Silva AM (2022) Microemulsions
and nanoemulsions in skin drug delivery. Bioengineering 9(4):158
Takeuchi I, Shimamura Y, Kakami Y, Kameda T, Hattori K, Miura S, Shirai H, Okumura M, Inagi
T, Terada H, Makino K (2019) Transdermal delivery of 40-nm silk broin nanoparticles.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 175:564–568
Tapfumaneyi P, Imran M, Mohammed Y, Roberts MS (2022) Recent advances and future prospec-
tive of topical and transdermal delivery systems. Front Drug Deliv 2:957732
Tortora GJ, Derrickson BH (2018) Principles of anatomy and physiology. John Wiley & Sons
Vadodaria S, Mills T (2020) Jetting-based 3D printing of edible materials. Food Hydrocoll
106:105857
Vaz VM, Kumar L (2021) 3D printing as a promising tool in personalized medicine. AAPS
PharmSciTech 22:1–20
Waghule T, Singhvi G, Dubey SK, Pandey MM, Gupta G, Singh M, Dua K (2019) Microneedles:
A smart approach and increasing potential for transdermal drug delivery system. Biomed
Pharmacother 109:1249–1258
J. Kaur et al.

287
Yamada M, Tayeb H, Wang H, Dang N, Mohammed YH, Osseiran S, Belt PJ, Roberts MS, Evans
CL, Sainsbury F, Prow TW (2018) Using elongated microparticles to enhance tailorable nano-
emulsion delivery in excised human skin and volunteers. J Control Release 288:264–276
Yotsumoto K, Ishii K, Kokubo M, Yasuoka S (2018) Improvement of the skin penetration of hydro-
phobic drugs by polymeric micelles. Int J Pharm 553(1–2):132–140
11 Challenges and Advances in Pharmaceutical Development of Topical…

289
12
Advances inOphthalmic Formulation
Development
RohitBhawale, VaibhaviSrivastava,
andNeeleshKumarMehra
Abstract
Recent advancement in ophthalmic drug delivery is mostly concentrated on med-
ication administering in the form of simple eye drops. Novel, innovative ophthal-
mic dosage forms possess advancement such as sustained release, less dosing
frequency and improved ocular bioavailability and permeability. The present
chapter will give an overview of the recent progress and challenges related to
advanced ophthalmic dosage forms in addition to anatomy of the human eye and
barriers which will be under consideration while developing ophthalmic drug
delivery systems. Application of 3DP (three-dimensional printing) in advance-
ment of ocular delivery systems will also be discussed in detail along with the
evaluation tests and their regulatory considerations.
Keywords
Ophthalmic · Nanomedicine · Liposomes · Nanoparticles · Regulatory
12.1 Introduction
The eye is a complex but essential sensory organ playing a characteristic role in
providing vision to living organisms. The eye is a delicate organ with complex anat-
omy and physiology (Fig.12.1). The eye’s three adjacent tissue layers—the centre
pigmented layer, the inner neurosensory layer and the outermost collagenous
R. Bhawale · V. Srivastava · N. K. Mehra (*)
Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutics,
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Ministry of Chemical
and Family Welfare, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
e-mail: neelesh@niperhyd.ac.in

290
layer—are anatomically arranged in this order. The two regions of this physically
and physiologically distinct organ that enable vision are (Irsch and Guyton 2009)
the front or anterior segment (which makes up one-third of the eye) including the
cornea, aqueous humour, conjunctiva, ciliary body, lens and iris and (Patel 2013)
the back or posterior segment (which makes up the remaining two-thirds of the eye),
which is made up of the sclera, retina, vitreous humour, choroid and optic nerve
(Fig.12.2).
To protect and keep this immune-privileged organ apart from the systemic circu-
lation, each eye tissue has a unique structure (Cunha-Vaz 1979). In the anterior
region, the collagenous layer that gives mechanical strength is known as the cornea.
It is translucent in nature and oversees the focusing light on the retina. The brous
collagenous posterior portion is opaque in nature, called sclera. The middle layer, or
uvea, contains the ciliary body and iris. Aqueous humour, which is secreted by the
ciliary body’s smooth muscles and serves as both food for the anterior segment’s
avascular tissues and a regulator of intraocular pressure, is also produced by the cili-
ary body. The ciliary body also carries out debris drainage from the cornea and lens.
The intermediate layer in the posterior part is made up of a huge network of capil-
laries known as the vascular choroid, which provides the retina with all its necessary
nutrients. The retina, which is the innermost layer, aids in transmitting light signals
to the brain. The lens refracts light entering the eye and is located between the two
chambers (Kim et al. 2014). The eye, while having a well-dened physiological
structure and makeup, is a very delicate organ that is prone to a number of disorders,
most often uveitis, which encompasses any inammation of the iris, choroid and
ciliary body together known as the uvea (Yellepeddi and Palakurthi 2016). In many
circumstances, uveal inammation affects the posterior section as well.
Fig. 12.1 The anatomy of the human eye
R. Bhawale et al.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
