Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5441_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Preformulation Studies
- •1.2.1 Solubility
- •1.2.2 Partition Coefficient
- •1.3.2 Parenteral Dosage Forms
- •1.3.3 Oral Dosage Form
- •1.3.4 Transdermal Dosage Form
- •1.3.5 Inhalational Formulation
- •1.3.6 Nasal Formulations
- •1.3.7 Ophthalmic Dosage Form
- •1.4 Scale-Up Studies
- •1.4.1 Pilot Plant
- •1.4.2 Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)
- •1.2.4 Bulk Properties
- •1.3 Prototype Development
- •1.4.3 Regulatory Approval
- •1.5 Commercialisation
- •1.5.1.5 Life Cycle Extension Strategies
- •1.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.1.2 Product Specification
- •2.1.3.1 In-Process Specification
- •2.1.3.2 Release Specification
- •2.1.3.3 Shelf Life Specification
- •2.1.4 Specification Design
- •2.1.5 Specification Justification
- •2.2.3 ICH Q6A Guideline
- •2.2.3.1 Objective
- •2.2.3.2 New Drug Product
- •2.2.3.3 New Drug Substance
- •2.2.3.4 Universal Tests
- •2.2.3.5 Specific Tests
- •2.2.4 ICH Q6B Guideline
- •2.2.4.1 Scope
- •2.2.4.2 Specifications
- •2.2.5.1 Q8(R2): Structure—Parent Guideline (Knight 2014)
- •2.2.5.1.1 Pharmaceutical Development: Introduction
- •Drug Substances
- •Excipients
- •2.2.5.1.3 Drug Product
- •Formulation Development
- •Overages
- •2.2.5.1.4 Manufacturing Process Development
- •2.2.5.1.5 Container Closure System
- •2.2.5.1.6 Microbiological Attributes
- •2.2.5.1.7 Compatibility
- •2.2.5.2 Q8(R2): Structure—Annex
- •2.2.5.2.1 Introduction
- •Quality Target Product Profile
- •Critical Quality Attributes (CQA)
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Design Space
- •Control Strategy
- •Drug Substance-Related Information
- •2.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.3.1 Factorial Designs (FD)
- •3.3.2 Fractional Factorial Designs (FFDs)
- •3.3.3 Plackett–Burman Designs (PBDs)
- •3.3.4 Central Composite Designs (CCD)
- •3.3.5 Box–Behnken Designs (BBD)
- •3.3.6 Equiradial Designs
- •3.3.7 Mixture Designs
- •3.3.8 Taguchi Designs
- •3.3.9 Optimal Designs
- •3.4.1 Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)
- •3.4.2 Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
- •3.4.3 Risk Management
- •3.4.4 Design Space
- •3.4.5 Control Strategy
- •3.6.2 Constraint-Based Optimization
- •3.6.3 Multi-objective Optimization
- •3.6.4 Expert Systems
- •3.6.5 Evolutionary Algorithms
- •3.9.1 Design-Expert
- •3.9.2 SIMCA
- •3.9.3 Minitab
- •3.9.4 JMP
- •3.9.5 MATLAB
- •3.9.6 Aspen Plus
- •3.9.7 AutoCAD
- •3.10.1 Pharmaceutical Industry
- •3.10.2 Food Industry
- •3.10.3 Chemical Industry
- •3.10.4 Biotechnology Industry
- •3.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.3.1.1 Fillers/Diluents
- •4.3.1.2 Binders
- •4.3.2.2 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.3 Sweeteners
- •4.3.2.4 pH Adjusters
- •4.3.2.5 Preservatives
- •4.3.2.6 Surfactant
- •4.3.2.7 Suspending Agent
- •4.3.2.8 Emulsifying Agent
- •4.3.2.9 Colorants
- •4.3.2.10 Viscosity Modifiers
- •4.3.3.1 Penetration Enhancers
- •4.3.3.2 Solvents/Solubilisers
- •4.3.3.3 Adhesives
- •4.3.3.5 Plasticisers
- •4.3.4.1.1 Bulking Agents
- •4.3.4.1.2 Lyoprotectants
- •4.3.4.1.3 Antioxidants
- •4.3.4.1.4 Buffering Agents
- •4.3.4.2.1 Buffers
- •4.3.4.2.2 Preservatives
- •4.3.4.2.3 Tonicity Adjusters
- •4.3.4.2.4 Solvent System
- •4.3.4.2.5 Solubilisers
- •4.4.1 Physical Incompatibilities
- •4.4.2 Chemical Incompatibilities
- •4.3.1.3 Disintegrants
- •4.3.1.5 Coating Agents
- •4.3.1.8 Solubilisers
- •4.3.2.1 Vehicles
- •4.4.3 Therapeutic or Physiological Incompatibilities
- •4.6 Related Regulatory Perspectives
- •4.6.1 GRAS
- •4.6.2 IIG
- •4.6.3 IPEC
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2.1 Binders
- •5.2.1.1 Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)
- •5.2.1.2 LYCATAB
- •5.2.1.3 GalenIQ (Isomalt)
- •5.2.2 Disintegrants
- •5.2.3 Lubricants
- •5.2.4 Co-processed Excipients
- •5.2.4.2 COMBILOSE
- •5.2.4.3 PEARLITOL CR-H
- •5.2.4.4 PROSOLV EASYtab SP (Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose)
- •5.3 New-Age Material Handling Techniques Developed
- •5.3.1 Automated Dispensing System
- •5.3.1.1 Unit Dose Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.2 Centralised Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.1.3 Robotic Dispensing Systems
- •5.3.2 Vacuum Conveying Systems
- •5.3.3 Flexible Screw Conveyors
- •5.4.1 Automation
- •5.4.2 Enhanced Safety
- •5.4.3 Higher Productivity
- •5.4.4 Enhanced Accuracy
- •5.4.5 Reduced Costs
- •5.6.1 Widely Used Databases
- •5.6.5.1 Tablets
- •5.6.5.2 Predicting Drug Release
- •5.6.5.4 Detecting Tablet Defects
- •5.6.5.5 Granules
- •5.7 Continuous Manufacturing Technology
- •5.7.1.1 Regulatory Uncertainties
- •5.7.1.2 Process Automation Technologies (PAT)
- •5.7.1.3 Equipment
- •5.7.1.5 Modern Process Control Techniques
- •5.8.1 Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
- •5.8.1.1 Process Variables
- •5.8.2 Applications
- •5.8.2.1 Stereolithography (SLA)
- •5.8.2.2 Printing Dosage Forms
- •5.8.3.1 Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)
- •5.8.3.3 Drawbacks
- •5.8.4.1 On-Demand Manufacturing
- •5.8.4.2 Improved Quality Dosage Forms
- •5.9 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Excipients
- •6.2.1 Superdisintegrants
- •6.2.3 Lubricants/Anti-adherents
- •6.2.4 Solubility/Dissolution Enhancers
- •6.2.5 Drug Release Rate Modifiers
- •6.2.6 Co-processed Excipients
- •6.3.1 Advanced Granulation Approaches
- •6.4 Process Automation
- •6.4.2 Fundamental Process Control Instruments
- •6.4.2.2 Rotary Tablet Press
- •6.5.1 Capping
- •6.5.2 Lamination
- •6.5.3 Chipping
- •6.5.4.1 Double Impression
- •6.6 Tablet Coating
- •6.6.1 Sugar Coating
- •6.6.2 Film Coating
- •6.7.1 Electrostatic Coating
- •6.7.2 Aqueous Film Coating Technology
- •6.7.3 Supercell Coating Technology (SCT)
- •6.7.4 Magnetically Assisted Impaction Coating (MAIC)
- •6.7.5 Dip Coating
- •6.7.6 Vacuum Film Coating
- •6.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Tablet Dosage Form
- •7.3 Global Market Analysis
- •7.4.1 Organ-Targeted Tablets
- •7.4.2 Modified Release Tablets
- •7.4.3 Miscellaneous
- •7.4.3.1 Chewable Tablets
- •7.4.3.2 Effervescent Tablets
- •7.4.3.3 Orodispersible Tablets
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Theoretical Considerations
- •8.2.1 Interfacial Properties
- •8.2.1.1 Surface Free Energy
- •8.2.1.2 Surface Potential
- •8.2.2 Electric Double Layer (EDL)
- •8.2.4 Wetting
- •8.2.5 Electrokinetic Phenomena
- •8.2.6 DLVO Theory
- •8.3.1 Flocculated Suspension
- •8.3.2 Deflocculated Suspension
- •8.4 Pharmaceutical Suspension Stability Study
- •8.4.1 Particle Settling
- •8.4.2 Particle Aggregation
- •8.4.3 Particle Growth (Ostwald Ripening)
- •8.5.3 Redispersibility
- •8.5.4 Flow Rate (F)
- •8.5.5 Viscosity Determination
- •8.5.8 Temperature Effect
- •8.5.9 Drug Content
- •8.5.10 In Vitro Dissolution Studies
- •8.5.11 Zeta Potential
- •8.5.14 Density
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.1 Macroemulsion
- •9.2.2 Microemulsion
- •9.2.3 Nanoemulsion
- •9.2.4 Pickering Emulsion
- •9.3.2 Surface Tension Theory
- •9.3.3 Molecular Adsorption Theory
- •9.3.4 Oriented Wedge Theory
- •9.4 Formulation
- •9.4.1.1 Dry Gum Method
- •9.4.1.2 Wet Gum Method
- •9.4.1.3 Bottle Method
- •9.4.1.4 In Situ Soap Method
- •9.4.1.5 Phase Titration Method
- •9.4.1.6 Phase Inversion Temperature Method
- •9.4.1.7 Spontaneous Emulsification
- •9.5 Stability
- •9.5.1 Gravitational Separation
- •9.5.1.1 Creaming
- •9.5.1.2 Sedimentation
- •9.5.1.3 Flocculation
- •9.5.2 Non-gravitational Separation
- •9.5.2.1 Coalescence
- •9.5.2.2 Droplet Aggregation
- •9.5.2.3 Ostwald Ripening
- •9.5.2.4 Phase Inversion
- •9.6 Evaluation
- •9.6.1 Macroscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.2 Microscopic Evaluation
- •9.6.3 Droplet Size Analysis
- •9.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •10.2.2 Antioxidants
- •10.2.3 Buffers
- •10.2.4 Vitamins
- •10.2.4.1 Vitamin B Complex
- •10.2.4.2 Vitamin C
- •10.2.4.3 Vitamin D
- •10.2.5 Electrolytes
- •10.2.6 Sodium
- •10.2.7 Potassium
- •10.2.8 Calcium
- •10.2.9 Magnesium
- •10.2.10 Chloride
- •10.2.12 Manganese
- •10.2.13 Selenium
- •10.2.14 Amino Acids
- •10.2.15 Carbohydrates
- •10.2.16 Dextrose
- •10.2.17 Lipids
- •10.3.1 Nutritional Support
- •10.3.2 Role of Parentral Admixture in Nutritional Deficiencies
- •10.3.3 Therapeutic Benefits
- •10.4.1.2 Aseptic Techniques
- •10.4.1.3 Dosing Considerations
- •10.5.1.1 FDA Guidelines
- •10.5.1.2 EMA Standards
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.1 Drug Solubility
- •11.2.2 Drug Stability
- •11.2.3 Skin Irritation
- •11.3 Manufacturing Challenges
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2.1.3 Corneal Tissue Compatibility
- •12.2.1.4 Isotonicity
- •12.2.1.6 Viscosity (Appropriate Rheological Properties)
- •12.3.1 In Situ Gelling System
- •12.3.2 Mucoadhesives
- •12.3.4 Ophthalmic Nano-Suspensions
- •12.3.6 Therapeutic Contact Lenses
- •12.3.7 Ocular Inserts
- •12.4.1 Corneal Tissue Bioprinting
- •12.4.2 Contact Lens
- •12.4.3 Drug Delivery
- •12.6.1 Physical Appearance
- •12.6.2 Identification
- •12.6.3 Assay
- •12.6.4 Impurities
- •12.6.6 Antimicrobial Preservatives
- •12.6.7 Bacterial Endotoxins
- •12.6.9 Sterility Test
- •12.6.10 Osmolarity
- •12.6.11 Ocular Irritation
- •12.6.12 Isotonicity Evaluation
- •12.6.13 Stability Study
- •12.6.14 pH
- •12.6.15 Viscosity
- •12.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 Improved Dissolution Rate by Surface Area Enlargement
- •13.3.1 Top-Down Approaches
- •13.3.1.1 Wet Bead Milling
- •13.3.1.2 Evaporation/Condensation
- •13.3.1.3 High-Pressure Homogenization
- •13.3.1.4 Laser Ablation
- •13.3.1.5 Ultrasound
- •13.3.2 Bottom-Up Approaches
- •13.3.2.1 Precipitation
- •13.3.2.2 Sol-Gel
- •13.3.2.4 Liquid Antisolvent Precipitation
- •13.3.2.5 Precipitation Assisted by Acid-Base Method
- •13.3.2.6 High Gravity-Controlled Precipitation
- •13.3.2.7 Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Method
- •13.3.2.8 Emulsion Polymerization Method
- •13.3.3 Combinative Technology
- •13.3.3.1 Nano Edge Technology
- •13.3.3.2 Smart Crystal Technology
- •13.4.2 SEM
- •13.4.3 TEM
- •13.4.4 AFM
- •13.4.6 Zeta Potential
- •13.4.7 DSC
- •13.4.8 XRD
- •13.4.9 FTIR
- •13.4.10 Raman Spectroscopy
- •13.4.11 TGA
- •13.4.12 Permeation Study
- •13.5.1 Oral Delivery
- •13.5.2 Parenteral Administration
- •13.5.3 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •13.5.4 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •13.5.5 Topical Drug Delivery
- •13.5.6 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Device-Related Challenges
- •14.2.2 Biological Barriers
- •14.3.1 Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1 Conventional Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.1 Jet Nebulizers
- •14.3.1.1.2 Ultrasonic Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.1 Mesh Nebulizer
- •14.3.1.2.2 Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer (VMN)
- •14.3.2 Dry Powder Inhalers
- •14.3.2.2.1 Active Devices
- •14.3.2.2.2 Digital/Smart Devices
- •14.3.3 Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)
- •14.3.3.1.2 Extra-Fine Particle Atomization
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2.1 Herbal Nanoemulsion
- •15.2.2 Herbal Nanoparticles
- •15.2.3 Herbal Hydrogels
- •15.4.1 Thermal Analysis
- •15.4.2 High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)
- •15.4.3 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •15.4.4 Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS)
- •15.4.5 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
- •15.4.6 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GCMS)
- •15.4.7 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy
- •15.5.1 Physical Instability
- •15.5.2 Environmental Conditions
- •15.5.3 Chemical Instability
- •15.5.4 Complex Mixtures
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Approaches
- •16.3.1 Phenotypic Screening
- •16.3.2 Target-Based Methods
- •16.3.3 Knowledge-Based Methods
- •16.3.4 Signature-Based Methods
- •16.3.5 Pathway or Network-Based Methods
- •16.3.6 Targeted Mechanism-Based Methods
- •16.3.7 Pharmacovigilance-Based Drug Repurposing
- •16.4 Virtual Screening (VS)
- •16.4.1 Molecular Docking
- •16.4.2 Ligand-Based Virtual Screening (LBVS)
- •16.4.3 Pharmacophore Modelling
- •16.4.4 Similarity Searching
- •16.4.5 Machine Learning (ML)
- •16.4.6 Structure Based
- •16.4.7 Molecular Dynamics Studies
- •16.4.8 Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR)
- •16.4.9.1.1 AutoDock
- •16.4.9.1.2 Chimera
- •16.4.9.1.3 Discovery Studio
- •16.4.9.1.4 Dock
- •16.4.9.1.5 MolDock
- •16.4.9.1.6 Argus Lab
- •16.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Pre-clinical Evaluations
- •17.2.1 In Vitro Pharmacological Studies
- •17.2.2 In Vivo Toxicity Studies
- •17.2.3 In Vivo Efficacy Studies
- •17.3 Clinical Evaluations
- •17.3.1 Clinical Trial Phases
- •17.3.1.1 Phase 0
- •17.3.1.2 Phase I
- •17.3.1.3 Phase II
- •17.3.1.4 Phase III
- •17.4 Pharmacovigilance
- •17.4.2 Clinical Trial Designs
- •17.4.3 Randomized Controlled Trials
- •17.4.3.1 Parallel Arm Design
- •17.4.3.2 Cross-Over Design
- •17.4.3.3 Randomized Withdrawal Design
- •17.4.3.4 Factorial Design
- •17.4.4.1 Stratified Randomization
- •17.4.4.2 Block Randomization
- •17.4.4.3 Cluster Randomization
- •17.5 Pharmacogenomics
- •17.5.1 Pharmacokinetic Gene Variation
- •17.5.2 Pharmacodynamics Gene Variation
- •17.7 Conclusions
- •References

342
nanocrystals (NCs) of brinzolamide (BRA) to enhance the solubility of the medica-
tion and reduce intraocular (eye) pressure. The BRA-NCs surpassed the perfor-
mance of the marketed product in terms of solubility, intraocular pressure reduction
in an ocular hypertension model, and cytotoxicity to corneal epithelial cells (ocular)
(Parmar etal. 2021).
13.5.5 Topical Drug Delivery
Nanocrystals (NCs) exhibit characteristics like improved permeation, bio-
adhesiveness, and heightened membrane penetration. However, sustained focus on
harnessing adhesion, rapid dissolution, and enhanced penetration for dermal and
mucosal applications was lacking for an extended period. This became advanta-
geous when formulating poorly soluble antioxidants such as apigenin, hesperidin,
and rutin as nanosuspensions for use in anti-aging and skin protective cosmetic
products. The nanocrystals are simply incorporated into the water phase of dermal
creams and oil-in-water (O/W) lotions. Despite containing nanosized crystals, these
products do not meet the criteria for nano products under the new European cosmet-
ics regulations. This is because the size of the NCs exceeds 100nm, and the parti-
cles are required to be biodegradable rather than bio-persistent (Sun etal. 2021).
The fundamental mechanism involves the NCs enhancing the solubility of poorly
water-soluble actives in the aqueous phase, resulting in a higher concentration gra-
dient. This principle is applicable to pharmaceutical dermal formulations as well. In
the case of diclofenac sodium nanosuspension for transdermal delivery, there was a
notable increase in the permeability ux of the drug across the skin, up to 3.8 times
higher compared to the control, as demonstrated in testing with the Yucatan micropig
(YMP) skin model (Patel etal. 2018).
13.5.6 Targeted Drug Delivery
The desire to targeting medications to particular locations using nanocrystals is
steadily growing, driven by both economic and therapeutic considerations.
Nanosuspensions provide a practical option for targeted (precise) delivery because
their external characteristics and invivo performances can be conveniently manipu-
lated. For example, in treating pulmonary aspergillosis, one can opt for amphoteri-
cin B nanosuspensions alternative of choosing pegylated liposomes. Achieving
effective intravenous targeting requires modifying the surface properties of the
nanocrystals (NCs). These surface properties play a crucial role in determining the
quantitative and qualitative composition of the blood protein pattern of adsorption.
By adjusting the surface properties, the particles can selectively adsorb to blood
proteins responsible for enrichment at the desired target site (Joseph and Singhvi
2019; Bansal and Kumria 2012; Bajwa et al. 2016).
To explore the intricacies of these application of nanocrystals, Table13.1 pres-
ents details on several drug nanocrystals, including examples such as albendazole,
celecoxib, and ibuprofen, along with their respective preparation methods.
Manshi et al.

343
Table 13.1 Formulations of drug nanocrystals
API
Stabilizers
Aqueous
phase Dosage form Method of prep. Route
Reference
Flubendazole Poloxamer 188 Water Nanocrystal Nanoprecipitation process Pulmonary Miyagi etal. (2023)
Valsartan Poloxamer 188 Puried
water
Nanosuspension Antisolvent precipitation Oral Sreeharsha etal. (2022)
Albendazole Tween 80, P127, or PVA
screened as stabilizer
Water Nanosuspension Wet media milling
technique
Parenteral Permana etal. (2021)
Curcumin
-α-Tocopherol polyethylene
glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS)
Water Nanosuspension Wet milling method Topical Pelikh etal. (2021)
Quercetin Poloxamer 188 (mg), Tween 80 Water Nanosuspension Wet milling technique Topical Manca etal. (2020)
Resveratrol Five different stabilizers, such as
HPMC, -α-tocopheryl
polyethylene glycol 1000
succinate (TPGS), Poloxamer
407, PVP K90, and Tween 80
Acetone,
water
Nanocrystal Antisolvent precipitation
technique
Oral Xiong etal. (2020)
Valero-
fenbendazole
HPMC, PVP, lactose, mannitol,
P407 or P188
Ultrapure
water
Nanosuspension Wet bead milling Oral Melian etal. (2020)
Ibuprofen Lutrol (poloxamer) F68 and Solu
plus, Natrosol 250, Methocel
K4M, Pharma coat 603, 606, 615
as suspension stabilizers
Distilled
water
Nanosuspension Wet media milling
technique
Oral Ouranidis etal. (2020)
Methotrexate Citric acid and PVA 10K Ultrapure
water
Nano
suspension
Acid-base neutralization
precipitation method
Intradermal
injection
Tekko etal. (2020)
(continued)
13 Advances andDevelopments inFormulation ofDrug Nanocrystals

344
API
Stabilizers
Aqueous
phase Dosage form Method of prep. Route
Reference
Irbesartan Poloxamer 407 as a stabilizer Puried
water
Nanocrystalline
suspension
Wet milling technique Oral Meruva etal. (2019)
Celecoxib Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
acetate succinate and
hydroxypropyl cellulose,
polyvinylpyrrolidone as primary
stabilizer and sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS), used as secondary
stabilizer
Ultra
puried
Milli-Q
water
Nanosuspension Wet medium milling
technique
Oral Ding etal. (2019)
Silybin PEG-chitosan as stabilizer Ethanol Nanocrystal Antisolvent precipitation
method
Oral Liu etal. (2019)
Domperidone PVP, HPMC, PVA, Eudragit,
Pluronic F127, and ethyl
cellulose
Water Nanosuspension Antisolvent-precipitation
method
Oral Ndlovu etal. (2019)
Fenobrate HPMC, PVP, PVA, and sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
Puried
water
Nanoparticles Evaporation assisted
solvent-antisolvent
interaction
Oral Kumar and Siril (2018)
Budesonide Mannitol as stabilizer Methanol Nanoparticles Liquid antisolvent
precipitation
Oral or
pulmonary
delivery
Hu etal. (2018)
Lutein Soy phosphatidylcholine,
mannitol, and PVP K30
Double-
distilled
water
Nanosuspension Antisolvent
nanoprecipitation method
Oral Chang etal. (2018)
Acelofenac Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS),
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose,
PVP K30
Ethanol Nanosuspension Precipitation-
ultrasonication approach
Oral Rahim etal. (2017)
Table 13.1 (continued)
Manshi et al.

345
API
Stabilizers
Aqueous
phase Dosage form Method of prep. Route
Reference
Diclofenac Poloxamer 188 Bi-distilled
11 water
Nanosuspension Wet media milling
technique
Topical Pireddu etal. (2016)
Spironolactone Poloxamers 407 and 188
(Pluronic F127 and F68), sodium
hydroxy cholate, hydroxypropyl
methylcellulose
Deionized
water
Nanosuspension Wet milling technique Oral Mu etal. (2016)
Indomethacin
and
itraconazole
Poloxamer 188, poloxamer 407,
polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), and
propylene glycol
Water Nanosuspension Wet milling technique Oral Liu etal. (2011)
13 Advances andDevelopments inFormulation ofDrug Nanocrystals

346
13.6 Marketed Products ofNanocrystals
Traditional treatments and certain innovative carrier systems face challenges related
to efcacy, stability, toxicity, and bioavailability. Consequently, certain drugs are
developed in the form of nanocarriers and introduced to the market to improve the
efcacy of treatment. Details about several marketed nanocarriers and their prepara-
tion methods can be found in the accompanying Table13.2 (Jia etal. 2023; Joshi
etal. 2019; Junghanns and Müller 2008).
13.7 Conclusion
The advances and developments in the formulation of drug nanocrystals repre-
sent a pivotal strategy for addressing the challenges associated with poorly solu-
ble drugs in the twenty-rst century. The adaptability of this technology is
remarkable, as it can be effortlessly employed for a broad spectrum of medica-
tions, making it a universal formulation principle analogous to micronization but
specically benecial for BCS class II drugs. One of the key advantages lies in
the ability to employ nanocrystal formulations for various routes of administra-
tion, including oral, parenteral (particularly intravenous), dermal, nasal, ophthal-
mic, vaginal, and pulmonary delivery. This broad applicability underscores the
potential of nanocrystals in tailoring drug delivery systems to specic therapeu-
tic needs.
Despite the widespread applications of nanocrystals, certain limitations exist,
for example, how the size of the end product affects the hardness of the original
crystals and the possibility of contamination. Overcoming these challenges, par-
ticularly with the introduction of bottom-up techniques, has expanded the scope of
nanocrystal technology. Notably, bottom-up methods like fast precipitation have
been enhanced to control particle size, and innovations such as binding organic
molecules in a network have mitigated issues related to excessive growth or size
enlargement. Recent developments in bottom-up approaches, specically those
involving seeding and mechanical pressure, have paved the way to organic nano-
crystals with dimensions spanning from 100 to 150nm across a variety of pharma-
ceuticals. It is crucial to acknowledge that while these advancements provide
promising solutions, the overarching consensus from reviews and studies afrms
that nanocrystal technology effectively addresses solubility and bioavailability
challenges in drug formulations. As we continue to rene and expand these meth-
odologies, the formulation of drug nanocrystals stands as a transformative and
indispensable facet in the quest for improved drug delivery and therapeutic
outcomes.
Manshi et al.

347
Table 13.2 Overview of current state of development of drugs using the Nanocrystal
®
technology
Trade name
API Category Company Preparation method
Route
Zanaex
®
capsules Tizanidine
hydrochloride
Muscle relaxant Acorda Ball milling Oral
Gris-PEG
®
Griseofulvin Antifungal Recro Gainesville LLC Precipitation Oral
Invega
™
Hafyera Paliperidone palmitate Antipsychotics Janssen
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Media milling Intramuscular
Apretude Cabotegravir Antiretrovirals ViiV Healthcare Media milling Intramuscular
Anjeso
®
Meloxicam Anti-inammatory Baudax Bio Media milling Intravenous
Theo-Dur
®
Theophylline Bronchodilator Mitsubishi Ball milling Oral
Tricor
®
Fenobrate Hypercholesterolaemia Abbott Ball milling Oral
Avinza
®
Morphine sulfate Analgesic King Pharmaceutical Ball milling Oral
Ritalin
®
Methylphenidate
hydrochloride
ADHD Acorda Ball milling Oral
Cabenuva Cabotegravir and
rilpivirine
Antiviral combination ViiV Healthcare Media milling Intravenous
Herbesser
®
Diltiazem Antihypertensive Mitsubishi Ball milling Oral
Aristada™ Aripiprazole lauroxil Atypical antipsychotic Alkermes High pressure
homogenization
Intravenous
Invega Trinza
®
Paliperidone palmitate Schizophrenia Janssen
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Ball milling Intramuscular
Vitoss
®
β-Tricalcium phosphate
Bone-grafting material Orthovita Inc. HPH Orthopaedic
Verelan
®
Verapamil HCL Antihypertensive Schwarz Pharma Ball milling Oral
Triglide
®
Fenobrate Hypercholesterolaemia Sciele Pharma Inc. Microuidizer Oral
Azopt
®
Brinzolamide Ocular hypertension Alcon Ball milling Ocular
(continued)
13 Advances andDevelopments inFormulation ofDrug Nanocrystals

348
Trade name
API Category Company Preparation method
Route
Focalin
®
Dexmethylphenidate
hydrochloride
Attention-decit/
hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD)
Novartis Ball milling Oral
Invega Sustenna
®
Paliperidone palmitate Antipsychotic Johnson-Johnson Ball milling Intramuscular
Cesamet
®
Nabilone Antiemetic Lilly Precipitation Oral
Megace ES
®
Megestrol Antianorexic Par Pharmaceutical
Companies, Inc.
Ball milling Oral
Rapamune
®
Sirolimus Immunosuppressive Wyeth Ball milling Oral
Emend
®
Aprepitant Antiemetic Merck Ball milling Oral
Naprelan Naproxen sodium Anti-inammatory Wyeth Ball milling Oral
Table 13.2 (continued)
Manshi et al.

349
References
Aguayo MG, Pérez AF, Reyes G, Oviedo C, Gacitúa W, Gonzalez R, Uyarte O (2018) Isolation
and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from rejected bers originated in the Kraft pulp-
ing process. Polymers 10(10):1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10101145
Ahmadi TA, Omranpoor MM, Vatanara A, Seyedabadi M, Ramezani V (2019) Formation of nano-
suspensions in bottom-up approach: theories and optimization. Daru 27(1):451–473. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s40199- 018- 00235- 2
Ali HS, York P, Blagden N (2009) Preparation of hydrocortisone nanosuspension through a bottom-
up nanoprecipitation technique using microuidic reactors. Int J Pharm 375(1–2):107–113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.03.029
Attama AA, Reginald-Opara JN, Uronnachi EM, Onuigbo EB (2016) Nanomedicines for the eye.
In: Nanoscience in dermatology. Academic Press, pp 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-
0- 12- 802926- 8.00025- 2
Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W (2021) Nanomaterials: a review of synthesis methods prop-
erties recent progress and challenges. Mater Adv 2:1821–1871. https://doi.org/10.1039/
D0MA00807A
Bajaj A, Rao MR, Pardeshi A, Sali D (2012) Nano crystallization by evaporative antisolvent tech-
nique for solubility and bioavailability enhancement of telmisartan. AAPS PharmSciTech
13(4):1331–1340. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249- 012- 9860- x
Bajwa N, Mehra NK, Jain K, Jain NK (2016) Targeted anticancer drug delivery through anthra-
cycline antibiotic bearing functionalized quantum dots. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol
44(7):1774–1782. https://doi.org/10.3109/21691401.2015.1102740
Bala N, Singh HK, Verma S, Rath S (2020) Magnetic-order induced effects in nanocrystalline NiO
probed by Raman spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 102(2):024423
Bansal S, Kumria R (2012) Nanocrystals: current strategies and trends. Int J Res Pharmaceut
Biomed Sci 3(1):407–419
Boles M, Ling D, Hyeon T etal (2016) The surface science of nanocrystals. Nat Mater 15:141–153.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4526
Bushell M, Meija J, Chen M, Batchelor W, Browne C, Cho JY, Clifford CA, Al-Rekabi Z,
Vandereet OM, Cranston ED, Lawn M (2021) Particle size distributions for cellulose nano-
crystals measured by atomic force microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison. Cellulose
28:1387–1403
Chang D, Ma Y, Cao G, Wang J, Zhang X, Feng J, Wang W (2018) Improved oral bioavailability
for lutein by nanocrystal technology: formulation development, invitro and invivo evaluation.
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 46(5):1018–1024
Chen M, Parot J, Hackley VA, Zou S, Johnston LJ (2021) AFM characterization of cellulose nano-
crystal height and width using internal calibration standards. Cellulose 28:1933–1946
Chogale MM, Ghodake VN, Patravale VB (2016) Performance parameters and characterizations
of nanocrystals: a brief review. Pharmaceutics 8(3):26
Dhibar M, Chakraborty S, Kundu A, Laha P (2023) Chemistry characterization and application
of nanocrystals-based drug delivery system: present to future perspective. Pharm Nanotechnol
11(3):265–275. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738511666230109151410
Ding Z, Wang L, Xing Y, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Han J (2019) Enhanced oral bioavailability of celecoxib
nanocrystalline solid dispersion based on wet media milling technique: formulation, optimiza-
tion and invitro/in vivo evaluation. Pharmaceutics 11(7):328
Gu W, Zeng Y, Deng Y, Huang P, Jin G, Liu F, Wei J, Li H (2023) Colloidal synthesis and opti-
cal properties of Cs2CuCl4 nanocrystals. Crystals 13(6):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/
cryst13060864
Guo M, Qin S, Wang S, Sun M, Yang H, Wang X, Fan P, Jin Z (2023) Herbal medicine nanocrys-
tals: a potential novel therapeutic strategy. Molecules 28(17):6370. https://doi.org/10.3390/
molecules28176370
13 Advances andDevelopments inFormulation ofDrug Nanocrystals

350
Harish V, Ansari MM, Tewari D, Gaur M, Yadav AB, García-Betancourt ML, Abdel-Haleem FM,
Bechelany M, Barhoum A (2022) Nanoparticle and nanostructure synthesis and controlled
growth methods. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 12(18):3226. https://doi.org/10.3390/
nano12183226
Hecq J, Deleers M, Fanara D, Vranckx H, Amighi K (2005) Preparation, and characterization
of nanocrystals for solubility and dissolution rate enhancement of nifedipine. Int J Pharm
299(1–2):167–177
Hu J, Dong Y, Ng WK, Pastorin G (2018) Preparation of drug nanocrystals embedded in mannitol
microcrystals via liquid antisolvent precipitation followed by immediate (on-line) spray dry-
ing. Adv Powder Technol 29(4):957–963
Imono M, Uchiyama H, Yoshida S, Miyazaki S, Tamura N, Tsutsumimoto H, Kadota K, Tozuka Y
(2020) The elucidation of key factors for oral absorption enhancement of nanocrystal formula-
tions: invitro–in vivo correlation of nanocrystals. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 146:84–92
Jacobs C, Kayser O, Müller RH (2000) Nanosuspensions as a new approach for the formulation for
the poorly soluble drug tarazepide. Int J Pharm 196(2):161–164
Jahangir MA, Imam SS, Muheem A etal (2022) Nanocrystals: characterization overview, appli-
cations in drug delivery, and their toxicity concerns. J Pharm Innov 17:237–248. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12247- 020- 09499- 1
Jarvis M, Krishnan V, Mitragotri S (2018) Nanocrystals: a perspective on translational research
and clinical studies. Bioeng Transl Med 4(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10122
Jia Y, Jiang Y, He Y, Zhang W, Zou J, Magar KT, Boucetta H, Teng C, He W (2023) Approved
nanomedicine against diseases. Pharmaceutics 15(3):774
Joseph E, Singhvi G (2019) Multifunctional nanocrystals for cancer therapy: a potential nano-
carrier. In: Nanomaterials for drug delivery and therapy. Elsevier, pp 91–116. https://doi.
org/10.1016/b978- 0- 12- 816505- 8.00007- 2
Joshi K, Chandra A, Jain K, Talegaonkar S (2019) Nanocrystallization: an emerging technology to
enhance the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Pharm Nanotechnol 7(4):259–278. https://
doi.org/10.2174/2211738507666190405182524
Junghanns JU, Müller RH (2008) Nanocrystal technology, drug delivery and clinical applications.
Int J Nanomedicine 3(3):295–310
Junyaprasert VB, Morakul B (2015) Nanocrystals for enhancement of oral bioavailability
of poorly water-soluble drugs. Asian J Pharm Sci 10(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ajps.2014.08.005
Kachhadiya DD, Sonawane AV, Murthy ZVP (2022) Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) char-
acterization using different analytical methods. In: Gulati S (ed) Metal-organic frameworks
(MOFs) as catalysts. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 16- 7959- 9_6
Kang H, Kim DS (2023) A study on the crystallization and melting of PLA nanocomposites with
cellulose nanocrystals by DSC.Polym Compos 44(11):7727–7736
Koneti V, Singh SK, Gulati M (2014) A comparative study of top-down and bottom-up approaches
for the preparation of nanosuspensions of glipizide. Powder Technol 256:436–449
Kulkarni SA, Myerson AS (2017) Methods for nano-crystals preparation. In: Roberts K, Docherty
R, Tamura R (eds) Engineering crystallography: from molecule to crystal to functional form,
NATO science for peace and security series A: chemistry and biology. Springer, Dordrecht.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94- 024- 1117- 1_16
Kumar R, Siril PF (2018) Enhancing the solubility of fenobrate by nanocrystal formation and
encapsulation. AAPS PharmSciTech 19:284–292
Kumar S, Bhushan P, Bhattacharya S (2017) Fabrication of nanostructures with bottom-up approach
and their utility in diagnostics, therapeutics, and others. Environ Chem Med Sensors:167–198.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 10- 7751- 7_8
Liu P, Rong X, Laru J, van Veen B, Kiesvaara J, Hirvonen J etal (2011) Nanosuspensions of poorly
soluble drugs: preparation and development by wet milling. Int J Pharm 411(1–2):215–222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.03.05
Manshi et al.

351
Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhao J (2019) Design, optimization and invitro-in vivo evaluation of smart nano-
caged carrier delivery of multifunctional PEG-chitosan stabilized silybin nanocrystals. Int J
Biol Macromol 124:667–680
Malamatari M, Taylor KMG, Malamataris S, Douroumis D, Kachrimanis K (2018) Pharmaceutical
nanocrystals: production by wet milling and applications. Drug Discov Today 23(3):534–547.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.016
Malatesta M (2021) Transmission electron microscopy as a powerful tool to investigate the inter-
action of nanoparticles with subcellular structures. Int J Mol Sci 22(23):12789. https://doi.
org/10.3390/ijms222312789
Manca ML, Lai F, Pireddu R, Valenti D, Schlich M, Pini E, Ailuno G, Fadda AM, Sinico C (2020)
Impact of nanosizing on dermal delivery and antioxidant activity of quercetin nanocrystals. J
Drug Deliv Sci Technol 55:101482
Melian ME, Paredes A, Munguía B, Colobbio M, Ramos JC, Teixeira R, Manta E, Palma S,
Faccio R, Domínguez L (2020) Nanocrystals of novel valerolactam-fenbendazole hybrid with
improved invitro dissolution performance. AAPS PharmSciTech 21:1–5
Mengge G, Yazhuo S, Bin L et al (2022) Sustainable preparation of cellulose nanocrystals:
state of the art and perspectives. Green Chem 2022(24):9346–9372. https://doi.org/10.1039/
D2GC03003A
Meruva S, Thool P, Shah S, Karki S, Bowen W, Ghosh I, Kumar S (2019) Formulation, and per-
formance of Irbesartan nanocrystalline suspension and granulated or bead-layered dried pow-
ders—part I.Int J Pharm 568:118189
Miyagi MY, de Oliveira Faria R, de Souza GB, Lameu C, Tagami T, Ozeki T, Bezzon VD,
Yukuyama MN, Bou-Chacra NA, de Araujo GL (2023) Optimizing adjuvant inhaled chemo-
therapy: synergistic enhancement in paclitaxel cytotoxicity by ubendazole nanocrystals in a
cycle model approach. Int J Pharm 644:123324
Moroz P, Boddy A, Zamkov M (2018) Challenges and prospects of photocatalytic applica-
tions utilizing semiconductor nanocrystals. Front Chem 6:353. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fchem.2018.00353
Mu S, Li M, Guo M, Yang W, Wang Y, Li J et al (2016) Spironolactone nanocrystals for oral
administration: different pharmacokinetic performances induced by stabilizers. Colloids Surf
B Biointerfaces 147:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.0
Müller RH, Jacobs C (2002) Buparvaquone mucoadhesive nanosuspension: preparation, optimisa-
tion, and long-term stability. Int J Pharm 237(1–2):151–161
Müller RH, Jacobs C, Kayser O (2001) Nanosuspensions as particulate drug formulations in ther-
apy. Rationale for development and what we can expect for the future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev
47(1):3–19
Müller RH, Gohla S, Keck CM (2011) State of the art of nanocrystals—special features, pro-
duction, nanotoxicology aspects and intracellular delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 78(1):1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.01.007
Murdande SB, Shah DA, Dave RH (2015) Impact of nanosizing on solubility and dissolution rate
of poorly soluble pharmaceuticals. J Pharm Sci 104(6):2094–2102
Naduparambath S, Jinitha TV, Shaniba V, Sreejith MP, Balan AK, Purushothaman E (2018)
Isolation and characterisation of cellulose nanocrystals from sago seed shells. Carbohydr
Polym 180:13–20
Nath D, Singh F, Das R (2020) X-ray diffraction analysis by Williamson-Hall, Halder-Wagner
and size-strain plot methods of CdSe nanoparticles-a comparative study. Mater Chem Phys
239:122021
Ndlovu ST, Ullah N, Khan S etal (2019) Domperidone nanocrystals with boosted oral bioavailabil-
ity: fabrication, evaluation, and molecular insight into the polymer-domperidone nanocrystal
interaction. Drug Deliv Transl Res 9:284–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346- 018- 00596- w
Niculescu AG, Chircov C, Bîrcă AC, Grumezescu AM (2021) Nanomaterials synthesis through
microuidic methods: an updated overview. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 11(4):864.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11040864
13 Advances andDevelopments inFormulation ofDrug Nanocrystals
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
