Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5249_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
12 Мб
Скачать
☆
4
e Medical Culture of Friars
his chapter seeks to answer the question, ‘Was there a distinctive medical
T
culture of friars in England?’ It will consider the kinds of medical interest shown by friars, as evidenced by their writings – what they read and studied, and what they communicated to others. e evidence available to us comes in the form of manuscripts, written, compiled, owned and used by friars. is means that our evidence is aected by gaps caused by the eects of catastrophic scattering of the friars’ persons, convents and their books in the 1530s. Even when the books survived, there are sometimes diculties involved in identifying friars’ books, given the fragmentary evidence of identity and ownership. But there is still sucient evidence to allow us to estimate the distinctiveness of the medical culture of the friars.
Distinct from what? Our idea of medicine in the central and late Middle Ages in England has been shaped overwhelmingly by the rise of the universities. Oxford and Cambridge were comparatively late on the scene, but faculties of medicine were in existence from the early fourteenth century.1 e English universities were following the examples of Paris and Montpellier, where the faculty of medicine was for teaching medicine to students who had already qualied as masters of arts. In Italy, there were doctoral colleges associating professors of medicine with physicians practising in the towns, while the student university conjoined the study of arts and medicine (although courses in arts and medicine were taught separately). In both forms of university, the teaching of medicine in the classroom, as in the arts curriculum, called for the provision of authoritative texts of Greek and Islamicate sources in Latin translation; the writing of commentaries, compendia and glossaries on them by teachers or masters; note-taking by students; and records of questions disputed and resolved. University-trained physicians (and later, surgeons) wrote expository texts on the practice of medicine as well as on the theory of medicine. ese last ran through causes of disease, through diagnosis of signs, prognosis and treatment, and were written to establish norms of medical practice, since
1
See Chapter 3, and Getz, ‘Faculty’, p. 381: Both the rst recorded medical gradu-
ates of Oxford and the earliest surviving statutes regularizing medical study date
from the early years of the fourteenth century.
124 The Medicine of the Friars in Medieval England
students of medicine were expected eventually to become practitioners. e masters who taught medicine were also themselves practitioners. ey claimed they were equipped by their studies to practise medicine on a rational basis and thus to meet a standard of rationality unavailable to the illiterati. Such claims came to be accepted by elites ranging from the royal and noble households to those of city burghers and the higher clergy. ese people were increasingly happy to put themselves in the hands of university-trained physicians and surgeons rather than healers of other kinds.
2
e emergence of the orders of friars in the thirteenth century coincided with these developments in university medicine and its increase in status and authority. ere is evidence that in Bologna, Taddeo Alderotti, the most celebrated professor of medicine, owed some of his intellectual formation to the Franciscans there. In his will dated 1293, he reciprocated by leaving Avicenna’s Canon in four volumes and his books of Galen to the Franciscans of Bologna.3 In the same year, he lay ill in the Franciscan house in Bologna and may have experienced nursing care there. His will provided that a huge sum totalling some £200 should be left to the friars of S. Francesco, and that some should go to the sick, the old and weak friars who had no other secular help or means of living.4 Taddeo also wrote a consilium, a formal letter of medical advice, for the Dominican surgeon and bishop Teodorico Borgognoni.5 is all goes to suggest an interplay of intellectual and practical medical obligation between university teachers and friars.6 As Angela Montford has established for the Dominicans and Franciscans in Bologna, the mendicant houses were increasingly happy to employ university-trained practitioners to heal the sick in their convents in the fourteenth century.7 But professed friars were not meant to study medicine at a university. Indeed, the study of medicine was not suitable for clerics at all. e visitation of Merton College Oxford in 1284
2
For medical education at the universities, see N. G. Siraisi, Medieval & Early Re-
naissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice (Chicago, 1990), pp.
48–77; for elites ‘buying in’ to medical rationality, see M. R. McVaugh, Medicine
before the Plague: Practitioners and their Patients in the Crown of Aragon 1285–1345
(Cambridge, 1993).
3
N. G. Siraisi, Taddeo Alderotti and His Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical
Learning (Princeton, 1981), pp. 33–4.
4
Montford, Health, Sickness, pp. 91, 95.
5
Siraisi, Taddeo, p. 38.
6
See now J. Chandelier and A. Tabarroni, ‘Philosophie, médecine et la science et
frères mendicants à Bologne dans la première moitié du XIVe siècle’, in Savoirs
profanes dans les ordres mendiants en Italie (XIIIe-XVe siècle), ed. J. Chandelier and A.
Robert (Rome, 2023), pp. 199–231.
7
Montford, Health, Sickness, ch. 6.
The Medical Culture of Friars 125
by John Pecham, Franciscan friar and archbishop of Canterbury, resulted in a letter from Pecham to the warden and fellows of Merton, whose rst article pronounced a ban on admitting students of medicine. Current students were threatened with exclusion if they attended lectures on medicine. is seems to have been an eort to prevent students of the new college from pursuing studies motivated by personal prot. It did not prevent Simon Bredon, a fellow of the college, graduating in theology and medicine in the 1330s, and many other later fellows also practised medicine like Bredon.8 Pecham’s ban would, however, most likely have met with Roger Bacon’s approval, as Bacon’s condemnation of the uselessness of scholastic medical study was accompanied by scorn for mercenary medical practice by physicians.
As we might expect given this evidence of entanglement, the distinctiveness of friars’ medicine did not entail a wholesale rejection of the scholastic way of doing medicine, or of its intellectual basis in the humoural medicine attributed to Hippocrates, Galen and the great Islamicate authorities, Avicenna and Rhazes. Roger Bacon’s assault on the errors of the physicians might seem at rst sight to have fallen on deaf ears. But this chapter will argue that much of the Baconian programme urged on Pope Clement IV did resonate with the friars. is explicit attack by a friar on university medicine in De erroribus medicorum also went on to set out an agenda for the kinds of medicine favoured by Roger Bacon in contrast to scholasticism. ere is a positive programme in this work which, if fullled, would enable philosophers (rather than scholastic physicians) to prolong human life and counteract sickness. What is required is the cultivation of seven special sciences known at the time of the prophets but more recently neglected, from which benets may be expected to individuals, most notably to the papal body, but also to Christian society as a corporate body. at society is perceived by Bacon to be under threat from Antichrist, external enemies like the Tartars and Saracens, and the corruption of the church (including the orders of friars themselves). e cultivation of these sciences will not only promote health but help to deliver Christian society from the terrible threats to which Bacon thought it was exposed in his own time.
Among the special sciences which must be cultivated are optics (perspectiva), astrology, alchemy, experimental science and medicine.9 Perspectiva explains how individuals are at the point of a cone of inuence from the celestial
8
I owe this point about Pecham’s ban to Laure Miolo.
9
e sciences of agriculture and weights are also listed by Bacon as neglected scienc-
es, but they are not so relevant here in respect of health and disease. See J. Hackett,
‘Roger Bacon on the Classication of the Sciences’, in Roger Bacon, ed. Hackett, pp.
49–65.
126 The Medicine of the Friars in Medieval England
bodies, and, as a result of this inuence, the complexions of their bodies will uniquely incline them in matters of health and disease. Regional groupings of people will share aspects of complexion inuenced by more diuse rays from celestial bodies. Practically, optical instruments may be used to gather and project these rays of inuence from the stars and planets. Astrology accounts for the changing patterns caused by the motions of the constellations of the zodiac and the planets, and allows prognostications of health outcomes and tells when best to undertake medical procedures and give medications. Alchemy provides means of extending human life with the help of elixirs and by purifying medicines. Experimental science (scientia experimentalis) is less a new science in a disciplinary sense than an endorsement of the value of observation and experience in establishing new truths – which syllogistic argument cannot do. Its use is to reveal secrets of nature not known to speculative science, and its fruits include new instruments and techniques, and new cures in medicine. Bacon was adamant that no magic, even natural magic, was involved in this. Medicine as a special science concerns itself with prescribing a regimen of health (as in Bacon’s edition of the pseudo­Aristotelian Secretum secretorum) and the application of other sciences described above to the provision of remedies.
Bacon’s enthusiasm for the sciences, which he claimed had been neglected by scholastic medicine, and whose revival was urgently needed if dangers to the Church, internal and external, let alone the imminent arrival of Antichrist on earth, were to be countered, was echoed by English friars in particular. Alchemy, scientia experimentalis and astrology proved to be very attractive to English mendicants after Bacon urged their study in the 1260s. ese special sciences, as applied to medicine, will provide structure to this chapter. is is not to claim that these sciences were only popular amongst the friars. Other English authors who wrote on medicine and related subjects – scholastics or not – were also receptive to the Baconian programme, with varying degrees of enthusiasm. But I will argue, admittedly grounding my evidence on what can only be a surviving part of what friars wrote on medicine in England, that the friars were most receptive to Bacon’s urging on the need for study of alchemy, scientia experimentalis and astrology.
is chapter will consider these areas of particular medical interest to friars, together with one other area denitely not championed by Roger Bacon. Women’s medicine and human procreation were taken up with surprising enthusiasm by English friars writing on medicine. No doubt, this particular focus had a lot to do with the role of friars in practising healing in the lay household (see Chapters 1 and 2).
The Medical Culture of Friars 127
Alchemy
For Bacon, there were two kinds of alchemy, speculative and operative or practical. Speculative alchemy teaches how all things, living or not, are made from a combination of the four canonical elements (re, air, water and earth). Each element is characterised by two of the four elementary properties: re is hot and dry, air is hot and moist, water is cold and moist, earth is cold and dry. e combination of these elements gives birth to humours, so that in each individual thing there will be varying proportions of four simple humours, blood, phlegm, bile and melancholy. One element will predominate in each simple humour. ere is more air than other elements in blood, more water in phlegm, more re in bile, more earth in melancholy. Similarly, the four simple humours are combined into a compound humour, in which one simple humour will predominate, not in quantity but in strength. ese compound humours are the ones presupposed in Galenic or humoural medicine and may be evacuated from the human body by physicians. It follows that the speculative alchemist operates on the body at a more profound level than the scholastic physician in Bacon’s account.
Speculative alchemy considers the relations of elements, simple and compound humours, but also corruptibility and incorruptibility of substances. Bacon’s reading of Aristotle on generation and corruption, and on substance and form, was overlaid by his profound religious commitment to the biblical account of the Fall of man and of the redemptive power of Christ’s sacrice. Incorruptibility comes from a corpus equale, a body of equal complexion, in which elements and humours are in equilibrium because the properties of the
10
10
On the texts of Bacon’s speculative alchemy see A. Paravicini Bagliani, ‘Ruggero
Bacone e l’alchimia di lunga vita: Riessioni sui testi’, in Alchimia e medicina nel
Medioevo, ed. C. Crisciani and A. Paravicini Bagliani (Florence, 2003), pp. 33–54;
editions of the three works addressed to Pope Clement IV are listed at https://ro-
gerbaconresearchsociety.com/works/, accessed 17 April 2023. Bacon’s theories are
expounded in W. R. Newman, ‘e Alchemy of Roger Bacon and the Tres Epistolae
Attributed to Him’, in Comprendre e maîtriser la nature au Moyen Âge, mélanges
d’histoire des sciences oerts à Guy Beaujouan (Geneva, 1994), pp. 461–79; W. R.
Newman, ‘e Philosophers’ Egg: eory and Practice in the Alchemy of Rog-
er Bacon’, in Le Crisi dell’alchimia/e Crisis of Alchemy, Micrologus 3 (Turnhout,
1995), pp. 75–101; W. R. Newman, ‘An Overview of Roger Bacon’s Alchemy’, in
Roger Bacon, ed. Hackett, pp. 317–36; S. Moreau, ‘Elixir atque fermentum: New In-
vestigations about the Link Between Pseudo-Avicenna’s Alchemical De anima and
Roger Bacon: Alchemical and Medical Doctrines’, Traditio 68 (2013), 277–325;
M. S. Allen, ‘Roger Bacon’s Medical Alchemy and the Multiplication of Species’,
in e Philosophy and Science of Roger Bacon: Studies in Honour of Jeremiah Hackett,
ed. N. Polloni and Y. Kedar (London, 2021), pp. 159–74.
128 The Medicine of the Friars in Medieval England
elements cancel each other out. It is stable and eternal. ere are three ways of getting this equal complexion. e rst is through the use of gold. Gold is the only substance in nature which has an equal complexion, but this must be prepared alchemical gold, not gold as mined from the ground. e resurrection body, promised to saved humanity after the Last Judgement, is also the corpus equale, but with an equality of quantities of elements, rather than of their strengths as with the third kind of corpus equale. is resurrection body, of course, is not available to humanity until the end of things. e third corpus equale is the goal of speculative alchemy. It achieves its end by ‘separating the elements’ of substances by means of stratication and fractional distillation and reducing the dominating element in each substance so that the strengths of all four are equal.11 e substances thus analysed and recombined were the means by which human artice could achieve the corpus equale. A further stage was required to make this medically eective. Optical instruments, specically a burning mirror, must be used to concentrate the light rays coming from benecent celestial bodies on the corpus equale. In this way, it can be enabled to propagate or multiply its own species, so as to activate the potential of recipient bodies like food, materia medica or human subjects and imbue them with the virtues of the stars, counteracting inrmity, pestilence and famine.
12
In his commentary on the Secretum secretorum, Bacon gave a recipe for the making of the philosophers’ stone or elixir. e alchemist begins with human blood, in which the four simple humours (phlegm, bile, blood and melancholy) can be distinguished by the eye. e simple humours within blood must then be separated, and each one purged from the others. ey must be remixed in a secret proportion, mixed with puried quicksilver, and then with the calx of a base metal and with that of a noble metal. is would work not only as a means of metallic transformation but would work on the human body in order to prolong life.13 It is a general medicine rather than a specic medicine for particular ills. Because body and mind are both inuenced by the complexion the elixir will alleviate defects of character caused by imbalance. In the Liber sex scientiarum Bacon claims that man might with the elixir reach perfect
11
Newman, ‘Overview’, p. 326.
12
Newman, ‘Overview’, p. 327; M. T. Tavormina, ‘Roger Bacon: Two Extracts on the
Prolongation of Life’, in Sex, Aging & Death in a Medieval Medical Compendium:
Trinity College Cambridge MS R.14.52, Its Texts, Language, and Scribe, ed. M. T.
Tavormina (Tempe, 2006), pp. 327–72 (pp. 331–2); Allen, ‘Roger Bacon’s’, p. 169.
Allen argues that the multiplication of species is the mechanism by which Bacon’s
alchemical elixir works on the recipient body: see Allen, Roger Bacon, pp. 87–98.
13
Newman, ‘An Overview’, p. 331.
The Medical Culture of Friars 129
wisdom and great foresight with the help of the grace of God.14 is recipe for the philosophers’ stone using human blood and targeted at prolonging life, a nobler goal than transmutation of metals, was destined for a long career in English medicinal alchemy, as we shall see.
15
Bacon’s ideas about prolongevity, extending human life by means other than adherence to the diet and regimen favoured by scholastic physicians, were just as signicant in their impact on English medicine and alchemy. ese ideas derived from a variety of sources, notably the pseudo-Aristotelian Secretum secretorum, and the De retardatione accidentium senectutis, both channelled through Roger Bacon. e latter treatise was usually thought in England to be Bacon’s own work but has since been shown to be that of a ‘domini castri Goet’, writing in the 1230s.16 Bacon took over these ideas in the Opus maius and in his own additions to his edition of the Secretum secretorum.17 e core idea was that the natural span of human life, even after the eects of the Fall of Man, is much longer than contemporary experience would suggest. In the Old Testament and in anecdotes from other classical authors, there are accounts of individuals who lived hundreds of years. Immoderate habits and
14
Z. Matus, ‘Resurrected Bodies and Roger Bacon’s Elixir’, Ambix 60 (2013), 323–40
(p. 329).
15
F. M. Getz, ‘“To Prolong Life and Promote Health”: Baconian Alchemy and Phar-
macy in the English Learned Tradition’, in Health, Disease and Healing in Medi-
eval Culture, ed. S. Campbell, B. Hall and D. Klausner (Basingstoke, 1992), pp.
141–51; Getz, ‘Roger Bacon’, pp. 337–64; Tavormina, ‘Roger Bacon’, pp. 327–72;
Yoeli-Tlalim, ReOrienting, pp. 117–20.
16
A. Paravicini Bagliani, ‘Ruggero Bacone autore del “De retardatione accidentium
senectutis”? With Addendum by Paravicini Bagliani and Steven J. Williams’, Stu-
di Medievali 3rd s. 28 (1987), 707–28; A. Paravicini Bagliani, ‘Il mito della ‘pro-
longatio vitae’ e la corte ponticia del Duecento: il ‘De retardatione accidentium
senectutis’’, in Medicina e scienze della natura alla corte dei papi nel Duecento (Spoleto,
1991), pp. 281–326 (pp. 318–21); C. Everest and M. T. Tavormina, ‘On Tarrying
the Accidents of Age’, in Sex, Aging & Death in a Medieval Medical Compendium:
Trinity College Cambridge MS R.14.52, its Texts, Language, and Scribe, ed. M. T.
Tavormina (Tempe, 2006), pp. 133–247 (pp. 133–4). e text was edited by A. G.
Little and E. Withington as Roger Bacon, De retardatione accidentium senectutis cum
aliis opusculis de rebus medicinalibus (Oxford, 1928).
17
Bacon’s edition is Secretum secretorum cum glossis et notulis, ed. R. Steele, in Opera
hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi (Oxford, 1920), V; S. J. Williams, ‘Roger Bacon and
His Edition of the Pseudo-Aristotelian Secretum Secretorum’, Speculum 69 (1994),
57–73; S. J. Williams, e Secret of Secrets: e Scholarly Career of a Pseudo-Aristotelian
Text in the Latin Middle Ages (Ann Arbor, 2003). For transmission and inuence in
various European literatures, see Trajectoires européennes du ‘Secretum secretorum’ du
Pseudo-Aristote (XIIIe–XVIe siècle), ed. C. Gaullier-Bougassas, M. Bridges and J.-Y.
Tilliette (Turnhout, 2015).
130 The Medicine of the Friars in Medieval England
the transmission of corruption of the body from fathers to sons put an end to such long-lived individuals. But there are secret remedies known only to a few adepts in natural philosophy and experimental science (and crucially not to physicians) which will restore the natural complexion or temperament lost by bodily corruption and inability to pursue a proper regimen. Bacon advocated the use of what he calls in the Opus maius the gloria ineabilis and, in his edition of the Secretum secretorum, the gloria inestimabilis. It was rst revealed to Adam and his sons. is is a compound medicine which combines eight other medicines targeting specic parts of the body. It must be fermented with honey and then exposed to stellar rays. It will strengthen the mind and morals as well as prolong life. It should be possible by these secret means to restore the natural span of human life, rather than submit to that imposed on man in contemporary Europe (‘For instance through this medicine life is extended to the ultimate limits of nature which God established, because it removes all inrmities, and reduces bad complexions to a good condition, and cures all sicknesses’).18 In general, Bacon used his medical writings to extol the virtues of certain special medical preparations, whose secrets could be discovered in the writings of the ancients. ese included rhubarb, precious stones, gold and silver, and viper’s esh, but all these needed to be treated alchemically to take away their ‘earthly’ or harmful components. As we shall see below, such medicines could be discovered using the scientia experimentalis.
19
e business of practical alchemy, by contrast to speculative alchemy, is to use a range of processes (distillation, fermentation and congelation or freezing, for example)20 to remove harmful materials in medicines to make them safer and more eective and to devise ways of making it possible to ingest powerful mineral medicines made from gold and precious stones. A dangerous medicine like quicksilver or mercury could be prepared by alchemical means, so that in small quantities it could have very powerful benecial eects on the human body. Similarly, the poisonous character of viper’s esh, a central ingredient in most theriac preparations, could be rendered harmless if it was prepared alchemically.21 While Bacon did not go into a lot of detail in describing the processes of practical alchemy, his programme was very much in line with the interest in distillation and fermentation to produce new kinds of medicines characteristic of the surgeons of his time. e Dominican surgeon Teodorico
18
On gloria inestimabilis, see Allen, Roger Bacon, pp. 119–24.
19
Allen, Roger Bacon, chap. 3, ‘Learning to Prolong Life’.
20
e full range of processes is described in Bacon, Opus tertium, cap. 114. See Allen,
Roger Bacon, pp. 57–9.
21
De erroribus medicorum, in Roger Bacon, Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, ed
Little and Withington (Oxford, 1928), IX, pp. 151–2.
The Medical Culture of Friars 131
Borgognoni (1205–96/8) was one of the rst European advocates of the use of distilled medicines and works on this subject by himself and others were to enjoy a spectacularly successful career in England.
22
In these ways, through alchemy and related sciences, notably perspectiva and the scientia experimentalis, Bacon could oer human beings far more than the dicult rebalancing of the compound humours through regimen and treatment oered by the scholastic physician. Enthusiasm for these Baconian and pseudo-Baconian writings on the alchemy of prolongevity continued in England long after Bacon’s death, and indeed until the seventeenth century. One of the most widespread of the pseudo-Baconian writings was the De retardatione accidentium senectutis, mentioned above. Versions of this and others of the prolongevity texts were translated into Middle English.23 It is not possible to separate out the part played by friars in copying or collecting texts on prolongevity, as so few of these writings can be identied with named individuals or religious houses. In the words of Faye Getz, ‘Bacon …was dear to the hearts of the English, who magnied his work almost beyond reason, and followed his interest in medical restoration into the fteenth century and beyond.’24 e measure of his inuence is best identied through the extraordinary number of texts attributed to Bacon to be found in the catalogue of English alchemical writings by Singer and Anderson, and the wide scattering of manuscripts in English libraries containing these writings. Further conrmatory evidence can be found in the Corpus of British Medieval Library Catalogues, searching under Bacon as author, and in the alchemical entries in the Voigts-Kurtz database, eVK2.
25
22
M. R. McVaugh, ‘Alchemy in the Chirurgia of Teodorico Borgognoni’, in Alchim-
ia e medicina nel Medioevo, ed. C. Crisciani and A. Paravicini Bagliani (Florence,
2003), pp. 55–75; McVaugh, Rational Surgery, pp. 189–208.
23
Everest, ‘On Tarrying’.
24
Getz, ‘Roger Bacon’, p. 337.
25
D. W. Singer, assisted by A. Anderson, Catalogue of Latin and Vernacular Alchemical
Manuscripts in Great Britain and Ireland Dating from Before the XVI century, 3 vols.
(Brussels, 1928–31). Roger Bacon is the second most cited author (after Hermes)
in this catalogue; eVK2, accessed 17 April 2023. Tavormina, ‘Roger Bacon’, p. 338,
points out that the second largest category (after Recipes) in the subject index to
eVK2, is ‘Alchemy’, with over 1400 records. Appearances of Roger Bacon in the
volumes of the CBMLC (still ongoing) may be found in the identications list
at https://www.history.ox.ac.uk/british-medieval-library-catalogues#tab-266421,
accessed 17 April 2023. Bacon also features in the Medieval Libraries of Great
Britain project: see http://mlgb3.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/authortitle/browse/, s.v. Roger
Bacon, accessed 17 April 2023.
132 The Medicine of the Friars in Medieval England
Bacon’s medical writings prepared the way for the importation to England and rapid spread of treatises on elixirs of life and quintessential remedies written by friars from southern France and Catalonia around the middle of the fourteenth century.26 John of Rupescissa (Jean de Roquetaillade, c. 1310–c. 1366–70) was a Franciscan tertiary27 gaoled for his millenarianism and prophetic writings, who wrote while imprisoned the Book of consideration of the quintessence (Liber De consideratione quintae essentiae) which promised to provide essential remedies for those he called poor and ‘evangelical’ men. ese remedies he claimed to be a hundred times as powerful as medicines made in orthodox pharmacological ways, that is, by compounding medicinal simples like herbs, animal parts or minerals. Rupescissa combined apocalyptic prophecy with a passionate commitment to promoting quintessential medicines obtained by multiple distillations from wine and herbs. ese had the advantage over most alchemical products of being available to the poor, who could not aord expensive medicines involving the processing of precious metals. Even more successful in England as an import was the ‘On the secrets of nature’ (De secretis nature) attributed to the author known as Raymundus or Lullius who was probably himself another Franciscan friar, but denitely not the real Raymond Lull from Majorca. Pseudo-Lull’s work built further on the foundations laid by John of Rupescissa’s medical alchemy. e form of these writings was evangelical, blending the prophetic excitement of millenarianism with the promise of extended life and delivery from all kinds of ailment. From the writings of John of Rupescissa and pseudo-Lull, quintessential remedies and special medicinal waters spread into the remedy books compiled for English households, both institutional and personal. De consideratione and De secretis nature were often thought to be the work of Roger Bacon in England and so attributed to Bacon in many English manuscripts. ese works on the elixir were popular in England in both Latin and Middle English versions and in excerpts as well as complete treatises.
28
26
S. Piron, ‘Les studia franciscains de Provence et d’Aquitaine (1275–1335)’, in
Philosophy and eology in the Studia of the Religious Orders and at Papal and Royal
Courts, ed. E. Kent et al. (Turnhout, 2012), pp. 303–58 (pp. 352–4).
27
A tertiary is a lay person who follows a religious rule, in John of Rupescissa’s case
that of St Francis.
28
J. R. Guerrero, ‘Desarrollo y Madurez del Concepto de Quintaesencia Alquímica
en la Europa Medieval (s. XII-XIV)’, Azogue 5 (2002–7), 30–56; L. DeVun, Proph-
ecy, Alchemy, and the End of Time: John of Rupescissa in the Late Middle Ages (New
York, 2009); Z. A. Matus, Franciscans and the Elixir of Life: Religion and Science
in the Later Middle Ages (Philadelphia, 2017); for pseudo-Lull, J. M. Rampling,
e Experimental Fire: Inventing English Alchemy 1300–1700 (Chicago, 2020).