Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5238_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
282
S. Grover et al.
11.4.4 Oxcarbazepine
Oxcarbazepine, a congener of carbamazepine, has been used for the treatment of BD. There is a lack of data on the use of oxcarbazepine during breastfeeding. A case report suggests a low milk plasma ratio (0.5) and a low concentration in human milk (<11μg/mL) with a low relative infant dose (1.5–1.7%) (Lutz etal. 2007). A case report documented normal development in the infant exposed to oxcarbazepine through breast milk during the rst month of life (Gentile 2003).
11.4.5 Lamotrigine
Available data in the form of case reports and case series suggests mean milk/ plasma ratios for lamotrigine to range from 0.40 to 0.61 (Liporace et al. 2004; Ohman etal. 2000; Page-Sharp et al. 2006; Rambeck etal. 1997). A study that involved 30 breastfeeding mothers receiving lamotrigine (50–800 mg/d; mean=386.5) and their infants reported a mean milk/plasma ratio of 41.3% with a range of 5.7 to 147%. Lamotrigine concentrations were higher in the breast milk 4hours after the intake of the drug by the nursing mother, although the nding was not statistically signicant. Infant plasma concentrations were 18.3% of that reported for nursing mothers. However, except for mild thrombocytosis in 7 out of 8 infants, no other adverse events were observed (Newport et al. 2008). A case report documented multiple episodes of apnea in the newborn while the mother was receiving lamotrigine, which improved completely when breastfeeding was termi­nated (Nordmo et al. 2009). A recent relatively large sample size study, which included data from 158 women and 143 breastfed newborns collected between the second and fth postnatal days, showed that the median lamotrigine concentrations in mg/L were 2.7, 1.4, and 1.7in maternal serum, milk, and newborn serum, respec­tively. The median milk/maternal serum concentration ratio and newborn/maternal serum concentration ratio were 0.6, and the median newborn serum/milk concentra­tion ratio was 1.00. A signicant correlation was observed between milk and mater­nal serum concentrations and between newborn serum and milk concentrations, maternal serum concentrations, maternal daily dose, and dose-related to maternal body weight. Based on these ndings, the authors concluded that exposure to lamotrigine among breastfed newborns was lower than that exposure during preg­nancy (Kocirova et al. 2022). LactMed considers the use of lamotrigine during breastfeeding to be relatively safe and recommends evaluating the plasma levels and monitoring the platelet count of infants.
11.4.6 Topiramate
A small sample study involving 5 mother-infant pairs reported very low topiramate concentrations in the infants, with no adverse effects seen among the infants (Ohman etal. 2002). The mean milk/maternal plasma concentration ratio was 0.86 (range,
11 Mood Stabilizers During Lactation
283
0.67–1.1) at 2–3weeks and 1month and 0.69 at 3months after delivery. Two out of the 3 infants who were breastfed had detectable topiramate levels, i.e., >0.9 microM concentrations, however, this was lower than the limit of quantication (2.8 microM), and one infant had an undetectable concentration (Ohman etal. 2002). There are other case reports of safe use of topiramate during lactation (Gentile
2009). However, a case report documented the association of diarrhea with topira-
mate, while breastfed by a mother who was receiving topiramate (Westergren etal. 2014).
11.4.7 Gabapentin
The mean milk/maternal plasma concentration ratio of gabapentin in milk has been estimated to be 1 (range, 0.7–1.3) from 2weeks to 3months. Accordingly, the mean infant dose is reported to be 0.2–1.3mg/kg/day, which is much lower (1.3–3.8%) than the maternal dose. In terms of plasma concentrations, plasma concentration in breast-fed infants has been estimated to be 12% of the mother’s plasma levels. No adverse effects were observed with low plasma concentration in the breastfed infants (Ohman etal. 2005). In a case report, the relative infant dose was estimated to be 2.34%, with the absolute infant dose being approximately 3% of the recom­mended children’s dose for gabapentin, and the infant plasma level was 0.4mg/L, which was about 6% of the maternal plasma drug concentration. No adverse events were reported in the infant (Kristensen etal. 2006).
11.5 Recommendations forUse ofMS During Puerperium
andLactation
Table 11.1 summarizes expert recommendations on the use of MS during the lacta­tion period. There is a high risk of relapse among patients with BD during the puer­perium. Hence, reinitiating the MS in the immediate post-partum period is
Table 11.1 Expert recommendations based on scientic evidence and clinical experience
High risk of relapse in the post-partum period Initiation and continuation of MS must be considered The decision to breastfeed the newborn must consider the risks & benets Baseline and regular evaluation of the newborn by a pediatrician is a must, with close monitoring for side effects The lowest effective dose of MS should be used Medications must be timed according to the neonates’ feeding pattern Valproate is considered safe; monitoring of infant liver function test is recommended Breastfeeding should be done with caution in mothers receiving lithium; regular monitoring of electrocardiogram, lithium levels, and blood counts to be done; information to be given to parents regarding warning signs in the newborn Lamotrigine is considered safe, however, data is sparse Carbamazepine may be used with caution and monitoring
284
S. Grover et al.
recommended for patients at high risk of relapse. Available data suggests that the use of lithium as a prophylactic agent in the post-partum period brings down the relapse rate from nearly 50% to less than 10% (Cohen etal. 1995).
Starting an MS during the post-partum period for the rst episode of hypomania/ mania/mixed episode is a tricky one, and this must be based on the consideration of the severity of symptoms and risk of continuation of symptoms to the mother and the fetus, including mother-child bonding. If the symptoms are severe enough, the use of MS needs to be considered.
If the MS is started, then whether to allow breastfeeding or not should take the risk and benets into account. The risk-benet analysis should take into consider­ation the benets of breastfeeding (both physiological and psychological), the desires of the mother, the risk of infant exposure to the medication, and the possibil­ity of refusal to treatment by a severely ill mother in favor of giving up breastfeeding (Gartner etal. 2005).
If the decision is made to continue breastfeeding while using MS, the newborn should be evaluated at the baseline and also must be monitored closely to minimize the risk. The newborn should be examined by a pediatrician for baseline behavior and other parameters like sleep, feeding, and alertness. The newborn should be eval­uated from time to time by the pediatrician to ensure normal development. The parents need to be informed about the possible side effects of the medication being used.
Certain physiological changes that occur during infancy must be remembered, which can help minimize the negative effects of MS on the infant, who is continuing breastfeeding. Older infants metabolize and eliminate various drugs more efciently than younger infants, and they generally sleep for longer durations. The long dura­tion of sleep can help in planning the dosing of the mother. It is generally recom­mended to administer the dose to the mother immediately after breastfeeding and just prior to the baby’s longest sleep interval (Grover and Avasthi 2015). While allowing breastfeeding, a close liaison needs to be maintained with the pediatrician and the discussions need to include sharing information about potential side effects of medication exposure to the newborn and possible drug interactions with other commonly prescribed medications to infants (e.g., antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti­inammatory agents, acetaminophen).
If the MS is used during breastfeeding, the dose must be kept at the lowest effec­tive dose. However, such an attempt must not lead to ineffective dosing, poor symp­tom control, and resultantly unnecessary exposure to the neonate.
In terms of selection of the MS, valproate is considered to be safer than lithium. AAN and AAP support breastfeeding if the mother is taking valproate (Harden etal.
2009; Sachs and Drugs 2013). However, monitoring of liver function tests and blood
counts for the newborn is recommended. Accordingly, if a clinician needs to start MS for the rst time during the post-partum period and parents/mothers wish to continue breastfeeding, valproate needs to be considered as the preferred agent.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) categorizes the risk of continuing psychotropic medications during lactation into ve categories (L1 = Safest; L2 = Safer; L3 = Moderately safe; L4 = Possibly hazardous;
11 Mood Stabilizers During Lactation
285
L5=Contraindicated). Among the currently available MS divalproex (L2), and car­bamazepine (L2) are considered to be safer than other options. Lithium is placed in the L4 category and lamotrigine is placed in the L3 category. Among the antipsy­chotics olanzapine is placed in the L2 category; risperidone, aripiprazole, and clo­zapine are placed in the L3 category, and quetiapine and ziprasidone are placed in the L4 category (ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline 2007).
Another categorization of medications according to the lactation risk includes the Hales categorization. According to this categorization, the available medications are divided into ve categories, i.e., L1- Safest; L2- Safer; L3-Moderately Safe; L4­Possibly Hazardous; and L5- Contraindicated. This categorization is updated every 2 years. According to this, carbamazepine and valproate are placed in the L2 cate­gory. Lithium is placed in the L4 category and lamotrigine is placed in the L3 cat­egory. Among the antipsychotics, olanzapine and quetiapine are placed in the L2 category; risperidone and clozapine are placed in the L3 category, and quetiapine and ziprasidone are placed in the L4 category.
Accordingly, if someone has to start a MS for the rst time during the post-par­tum period, valproate and carbamazepine are considered to be most compatible with breastfeeding. However, it is important to note that it is recommended to monitor the liver function tests of newborn while using valproate. Among the antipsychotics, olanzapine and quetiapine are considered to be most compatible with breastfeeding. In recent times data has also emerged on the safety of lurasidone during lactation. However, this is only in the form of case reports and not sufcient to make any specic recommendations.
According to the recommendations of AAP, breastfeeding should be done with caution while using lithium in mothers, and if this is permitted then the breastfed infant needs to be monitored for serum lithium levels, ECG, and complete blood counts from time to time (Sachs and Drugs 2013). Accordingly, lithium needs to be used when this has been used during pregnancy or the patient has a past history of response to lithium. If there are no contraindications, the mother may be given an option to switch to valproate. It is important to remember that mothers may require lower doses of lithium during the post-partum period when compared to those required during pregnancy. Hence, the maternal lithium dose needs to be reduced to the pre-pregnancy level, immediately after delivery, and serum lithium levels must be monitored. Further, the mother must be informed to monitor the newborn for signs of dehydration, lethargy, and feeding problems. The newborn must be screened for thyroid and renal functions, and maternal and infant serum lithium levels must be done if clinically indicated. The renal functions of the newborn must be moni­tored closely, especially during the rst 6weeks of life. The newborn must also be monitored for subtle neurological signs and needs to be referred for early interven­tion when indicated (Viguera etal. 2007b; Ugaz and Sharma 2016).
Lamotrigine is also considered safe during breastfeeding. However, it should be used during lactation when other safer options are not available. If carbamazepine is used, then the infant should be monitored closely for jaundice, drowsiness, ade­quate weight gain, and developmental milestones (Davanzo etal. 2013). LactMed
286
S. Grover et al.
database also recommends similar monitoring of breastfeeding infants, whose mothers are receiving carbamazepine. Data for other anticonvulsants is cursory.

11.6 Conclusion

The issue of the safety of the use of MS during lactation is far from being resolved. Accordingly, the decision to prescribe while continuing breastfeeding should be taken in the light of the severity of mental disease, and MS should be considered only when the potential risk to the fetus from exposure to medication outweighs the risk of untreated maternal mental disorder. The selection of the medication depends on the balance between safety and efcacy prole. Whenever MS is started during lactation, the newborn must be monitored closely.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 87 November
2007: use of psychiatric medications during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol.
2007;110(5):1179–98. Beath SV.Hepatic function and physiology in the newborn. Semin Neonatol. 2003;8:337–46. Bogen DL, Sit D, Genovese A, Wisner KL.Three cases of lithium exposure and exclusive breast-
feeding. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2012;15:69–72. Britton JR, Britton HL, Gronwaldt V. Breastfeeding, sensitivity, and attachment. Pediatrics.
2006;118:1436–43. Burt VK, Suri R, Altshuler L, Stowe Z, Hendrick VC, Muntean E.The use of psychotropic medica-
tions during breast-feeding. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:1001–9. Chaudron LH, Jefferson JW.Mood stabilizers during breastfeeding: a review. J Clin Psychiatry.
2000;61:79–90. Cohen LS, Sichel DA, Robertson LM, Heckscher E, Rosenbaum JF.Postpartum prophylaxis for
women with bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:1641–5. Conejo-Galindo J, Sanz-Giancola A, Alvarez-Mon MA, Ortega MA, Gutierrez-Rojas L, Lahera
G.Postpartum relapse in patients with bipolar disorder. J Clin Med. 2022;11:3979. Davanzo R, Dal Bo S, Bua J, Copertino M, Zanelli E, Matarazzo L.Antiepileptic drugs and breast-
feeding. Ital J Pediatr. 2013;39:50–4. Department of Health and Human Service Ofce on Women’s Health. Benets of breastfeeding.
Nutr Clin Care. 2003;6:125–31. Freeman MP, Smith KW, Freeman SA, McElroy SL, Kmetz GE, Wright R, Keck PE Jr. The
impact of reproductive events on the course of bipolar disorder in women. J Clin Psychiatry.
2002;63:284–7. Frew JR.Psychopharmacology of bipolar I disorder during lactation: a case report of the use of
lithium and aripiprazole in a nursing mother. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18:135–6. Frey B, Schubiger G, Musy JP.Transient cholestatic hepatitis in a neonate associated with carbam-
azepine exposure during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Eur J Pediatr. 1990;150:136–8. Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O’Hare D, Schanler RJ.Breastfeeding and the
use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115:496–506. Gentile S.Oxcarbazepine in pregnancy and lactation. Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23:687. Gentile S.Topiramate in pregnancy and breastfeeding. Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29:139–41. Grover S, Avasthi A. Mood stabilizers in pregnancy and lactation. Indian J Psychiatry.
2015;57(Suppl 2):S308–23.
11 Mood Stabilizers During Lactation
Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY, Pennell PB, French JA, Allen Hauser W, etal. Management issues
for women with epilepsy-focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): I.Obstetrical com-
plications and change in seizure frequency: report of the quality standards subcommittee and
therapeutics and technology assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of neurology
and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia. 2009;50:1229–36. Heinonen E, Tötterman K, Bäck K, Sarman I, Svedenkrans J, Forsberg L. Lithium use during
breastfeeding was safe in healthy full-term infants under strict monitoring. Acta Paediatr.
2022;111(10):1891–8. Horta BL, de Sousa BA, de Mola CL.Breastfeeding and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Curr Opin
Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018:112–5. Imaz ML, Torra M, Soy D, García-Esteve L, Martin-Santos R.Clinical lactation studies of lithium:
a systematic review. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1005. Imaz ML, Langohr K, Torra M, Soy D, García-Esteve L, Martin-Santos R.Neonatal feeding trajec-
tories in mothers with bipolar disorder taking lithium: pharmacokinetic data. Front Pharmacol.
2021a;12:752022. Imaz ML, Soy D, Torra M, García-Esteve L, Soler C, Martin-Santos R.Case report: clinical and
pharmacokinetic prole of lithium monotherapy in exclusive breastfeeding. A follow-up case
series. Front Pharmacol. 2021b;12:647414. Ito S, Lee A.Drug excretion into breast milk– overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:617–27. Jefferson JW, Greist J, Ackermann D. Lithium encyclopaedia for clinical practice. 2nd ed.
Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 1987. p.504–25. Jones I, Craddock N.Bipolar disorder and childbirth: the importance of recognising risk. Br J
Psychiatry. 2005;186:453–4. Kacirova I, Grundmann M, Brozmanova H. Valproic acid concentrations in nursing mothers,
mature milk, and breastfed infants in monotherapy and combination therapy. Epilepsy Behav.
2019;95:112–6. Kacirova I, Grundmann M, Brozmanova H. Therapeutic monitoring of carbamazepine and its
active metabolite during the 1st postnatal month: inuence of drug interactions. Biomed
Pharmacother. 2021;137:111412. Kacirova I, Grundmann M, Brozmanova H.Monitoring of lamotrigine concentrations in mothers,
colostrum, and breastfed newborns during the early postpartum period. Biomed Pharmacother.
2022;151:113167. Kendell RE, Chalmers JC, Platz C. Epidemiology of puerperal psychoses. Br J Psychiatry.
1987;150:662–73. Kristensen JH, Ilett KF, Hackett LP, Kohan R.Gabapentin and breastfeeding: a case report. J Hum
Lact. 2006;22:426–8. Lawrence RM. Circumstances when breastfeeding is contraindicated. Pediatr Clin N Am.
2013;60:295–318. Liporace J, Kao A, D’Abreu A. Concerns regarding lamotrigine and breast-feeding. Epilepsy
Behav. 2004;5:102–5. Lutz UC, Wiatr G, Gaertner H-J, Bartels M.Oxcarbazepine treatment during breast-feeding: a case
report. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27:730–2. McAllister-Williams RH, Baldwin DS, Cantwell R, Easter A, Gilvarry E, Glover V, Green L,
Gregoire A, Howard LM, Jones I, Khalifeh H. British Association for Psychopharmacology
consensus guidance on the use of psychotropic medication preconception, in pregnancy and
postpartum 2017. J Psychopharmacol. 2017;31(5):519–52. Merlob P, Mor N, Litwin A.Transient hepatic dysfunction in an infant of an epileptic mother treated
with carbamazepine during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Ann Pharmacother. 1992;26:1563–5. Moretti ME, Koren G, Verjee Z, Ito S. Monitoring lithium in breast milk: an individualized
approach for breast-feeding mothers. Ther Drug Monit. 2003;25:364–6. Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Meltzer-Brody S, Mortensen PB, Jones I. Psychiatric disorders
with postpartum onset: possible early manifestations of bipolar affective disorders. Arch Gen
Psychiatry. 2012;69:428–34.
287
288
Newport DJ, Pennell PB, Calamaras MR, Ritchie JC, Newman M, Knight B, Viguera AC, Liporace
J, Stowe ZN. Lamotrigine in breast milk and nursing infants: determination of exposure.
Pediatrics. 2008;122:e223–31. Nordmo E, Aronsen L, Wasland K, Småbrekke L, Vorren S.Severe apnea in an infant exposed to
lamotrigine in breast milk. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:1893–7. Ohman I, Vitols S, Tomson T.Lamotrigine in pregnancy: pharmacokinetics during delivery, in the
neonate, and during lactation. Epilepsia. 2000;41:709–13. Ohman I, Vitols S, Luef G, Söderfeldt B, Tomson T.Topiramate kinetics during delivery, lactation,
and in the neonate: preliminary observations. Epilepsia. 2002;43:1157–60. Ohman I, Vitols S, Tomson T. Pharmacokinetics of gabapentin during delivery, in the neo-
natal period, and lactation: does a fetal accumulation occur during pregnancy? Epilepsia.
2005;46:1621–4. Page-Sharp M, Kristensen JH, Hackett LP, Beran RG, Rampono J, Hale TW, Kohan R, Ilett
KF.Transfer of lamotrigine into breast milk. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:1470–1. Piontek CM, Baab S, Peindl KS, Wisner KL.Serum valproate levels in 6 breastfeeding mother-
infant pairs. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:170–2. Rambeck B, Kurlemann G, Stodieck SR, May TW, Jürgens U.Concentrations of lamotrigine in a
mother on lamotrigine treatment and her newborn child. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;51:481–4. Sachs HC, Drugs CO.The transfer of drugs and therapeutics into human breast milk: an update on
selected topics. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e796–809. Smith B, Dubovsky SL.Pharmacotherapy of mood disorders and psychosis in pre- and post-natal
women. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18:1703–19. Stahl MM, Neiderud J, Vinge E. Thrombocytopenic purpura and anemia in a breast-fed infant
whose mother was treated with valproic acid. J Pediatr. 1997;130:1001–3. Terp IM, Mortensen PB.Post-partum psychoses. Clinical diagnoses and relative risk of admission
after parturition. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172:521–6. Uguz F, Sharma V.Mood stabilizers during breastfeeding: a systematic review of the recent litera-
ture. Bipolar Disord. 2016 Jun;18(4):325–33. Viguera AC, Nonacs R, Cohen LS, Tondo L, Murray A, Baldessarini RJ.Risk of recurrence of
bipolar disorder in pregnant and nonpregnant women after discontinuing lithium maintenance.
Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:179–84. Viguera AC, Newport DJ, Ritchie J, Stowe Z, Whiteld T, Mogielnicki J, Baldessarini RJ, Zurick
A, Cohen LS.Lithium in breast milk and nursing infants: clinical implications. Am J Psychiatry.
2007a;164:342–5. Viguera AC, Whiteld T, Baldessarini RJ, Newport DJ, Stowe Z, Reminick A, etal. Risk of recur-
rence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer
discontinuation. Am J Psychiatry. 2007b;164:1817–24. Wesseloo R, Kamperman AM, Munk-Olsen T, Pop VJ, Kushner SA, Bergink V. Risk of post-
partum relapse in bipolar disorder and postpartum psychosis: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173:117–27. Westergren T, Hjelmeland K, Kristoffersen B, Johannessen SI, Kalikstad B.Probable topiramate-
induced diarrhea in a 2-month-old breast-fed child –a case report. Epilepsy Behav Case Rep.
2014;2:22–3. Whaites Heinonen E, Tötterman K, Bäck K, Sarman I, Forsberg L, Svedenkrans J.High lithium
concentration at delivery is a potential risk factor for adverse outcomes in breastfed infants: a
retrospective cohort study. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2023;11(1):36. Wisner KL, Perel JM.Serum levels of valproate and carbamazepine in breastfeeding mother-infant
pairs. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998;18:167–9. Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stowe Z, Leibenluft E, Cohen L, Miller L, Manber R, Viguera A, Suppes
T, Altshuler L.Management of bipolar disorder during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
Focus. 2005;3:266–79.
S. Grover et al.
Benzodiazepines andZ-Drugs inPregnancy
CesarioBellantuono

12.1 Introduction

Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy and postpartum are common and often need to be treated with psychotropic drug treatment. Benzodiazepines (BDZs), together with the so-called hypnotic Z-drugs, are one of the most widely prescribed psycho­tropic treatments, not only in psychiatric practice but also in several medical elds, for the treatment of several psychopathological conditions, particularly concerning acute anxiety and relevant sleep disorders. It has been estimated that from 5% to 15% of the adult general population have received a prescription of BDZs and Z-drugs, in many cases even for a long period of time (Galbally etal. 2014). It was documented that approximately 50% of adults report a difculty in initiating or maintaining sleep or having unrefreshing sleep, whereas upwards of 20% of adults meet strict diagnostic criteria for a diagnosis of clinically relevant insomnia. Insomnia is also the most prevalent sleep disorder experienced in women during pregnancy, affecting a signicant number of pregnant women. The prevalence of insomnia during pregnancy is usually high from the start, and two-thirds of pregnant women suffer from insomnia in the later months of their pregnancy. Results emerg­ing from a recent meta-analysis conrm that the prevalence of insomnia is higher during pregnancy, particularly in the third trimester; the overall prevalence during the antenatal period was estimated to be 38% (Sedov etal. 2021). It is well estab­lished that insomnia is related to several potential maternal and infant health risks, such as adverse pregnancy outcomes (e.g., hypertension, gestational diabetes mel­litus). Disturbed sleep in early and late pregnancy may also increase the risk of cardio-metabolic disorders, which are associated with maternal and infant morbidity.
12
C. Bellantuono (*) DeGra Clinic for Perinatal Mental Disorders, Verona, Italy;
http://www.depressionegravidanza.it
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 F. Uguz, L. Orsolini (eds.), Perinatal Psychopharmacology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99720-4_12
289
290
C. Bellantuono
Insomnia is also frequently related during pregnancy and postpartum to several psychiatric disorders, such as major depression, general anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorders. In addition, sleep loss during pregnancy has been associated to fetal intrauterine growth retardation and longer duration of delivery (Wang etal. 2020). During the last two decades, with a parallel increased focus in the clinical research and development of newer antidepressants and antipsychotics, we assisted to a reduced interest in BDZs, generating therefore the false impression that these drugs represent an outdated issue in the eld of clinical psychopharmacology, despite their current widespread utilization in general population. On the other hand, the prescription of anxiolytic and sleep-promoting drugs may be responsible for their uncontrolled, long-term use, with a higher potential for abuse, misuse, and depen­dence, particularly among polysubstance users (Walton et al. 2016). However, it should also be said that the above-mentioned risks need to be always carefully bal­anced with the clinical benets that many patients may experience with a short or intermittent use of these drugs taken at therapeutic dosages.
Many expert opinions support the use of BDZs and Z-drugs as treatments of choice for acute situational anxiety, anxiety disorders associated with depressive episode, insomnia, and alcohol withdrawal syndromes. Tolerance can develop to sedation and possibly to psychomotor impairment, but not to the anxiolytic effect. Moreover, in contrast to commonly held opinion, BDZs are not frequently misused or at risk of misuse of other substances in patients without substance use disorders who are prescribed these drugs for appropriate indications and at lowest effective therapeutic doses with regular clinical monitoring by the attending physician (Dubovsky and Marshall 2022). It is also well known that BDZs and Z-drugs are usually not lethal in overdose, except when ingested with other substances, such as alcohol, opioids, and CNS depressant drugs. The mechanism of action of BDZ at CNS level is clearly delineated as well as their pharmacokinetic properties, meta­bolic pathways, and risk of drug interaction, allowing for greater precision in their routine clinical use. Moreover, the continued widespread use of antianxiety and hypnotic medication for several clinical conditions testies their usefulness for many patients, but at same time strongly recommend that these drugs must be pre­scribed and used in agreement with the rules of good clinical practice.
The common assertion that the prescription of these drugs leads by default to the abuse of other substances or misuse seems therefore not supported by clinical expe­rience and observational studies. In any case, considering the current widespread prescriptions of BDZs and Z-drugs both in general practice and in specialist psychi­atric and non-psychiatric setting, it is advisable for an appropriate use to encourage the implementation of specic training interventions concerning their prescriptions in clinical setting; this strategy is considered a useful tool to minimize the risk of abuse and/or misuse by some patients as well as the risk of malpractice by physi­cians’ prescribers. Finally, it is worthwhile to remember that since 2–3% of preg­nant women take a BDZ and/or a Z-drug, the issue concerning their prescription in the perinatal period is not trivial, still remaining a topic for future clinical and epi­demiological studies (Bellantuono etal. 2014; Bais etal. 2020).
12 Benzodiazepines andZ-Drugs inPregnancy
291
12.2 Pharmacological Profile ofBenzodiazepines
andZ-Drugs
Benzodiazepines (BDZs) are a pharmacological class of drugs including agents that work on the CNS, by selectively acting on gamma-aminobutyric acid alfa­receptors (GABA-A). GABA is a neurotransmitter that inhibits or reduces the activity of neurons within the brain, particularly in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. BDZs open GABA-activated chloride channels and allow chloride ions to enter the neurons. This makes the neuron negatively charged and resistant to excitation. Even though all BDZs work in a similar way at CNS level, there are relevant differences in the way in which a specic BDZ acts on different GABA-A receptor subtypes. In addition, some BDZs are more “potent” than oth­ers and are eliminated from the plasma more slowly than others; some BDZs can also generate active metabolites, as in the case of diazepam, which generates the desmethyl-diazepam, also called “nordiazepam”. Since the introduction of the rst BDZ, the chlordiazepoxide in 1962, many other compounds were intro­duced into the pharmaceutical market. These drugs have been usually classied according to their length of elimination plasma half-life (t½), hepatic metabolic pathways, the formation of active metabolites, and the interactions with other drugs. All BDZs are commonly considered very safe drugs, as no fatalities have been associated in patients taking these drugs in overdoses; symptoms observed after overdose of BDZs alone include usually deep drowsiness, sedation, and muscle relaxation. Moreover, BDZs do not cause in huge overdosages severe respiratory, cardiovascular, and CNS depression. Their side effects prole is well known (e.g., mild worsening of psychomotor performance and sleepiness), and it is dose-dependent, therefore these drugs must be prescribed in each patient using the lowest effective dosage for the treatment of anxiety conditions as well as sleep problems (Bellantuono etal. 1980). This is particularly relevant to avoid or minimize a withdrawal reaction in newborns exposed to such medi­cation during pregnancy. Table12.1 summarizes the most relevant pharmaco­logical characteristics of BDZs.
Z-Drugs are a non-benzodiazepine class of drugs commonly prescribed in clini­cal practice for the short-term treatment of insomnia. Z-drugs, also dened as “hyp-
notic benzodiazepine receptor agonists” (HBRA), include the following agents: zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon. HBRA binds to the BDZ receptor subunit of the
GABA­These agents are metabolized by the liver, have a short elimination half-life ranging from 2 to 6h, are generally well tolerated by the patients, and are usually considered to be less addictive and/or habit-forming than BDZs. However, a number of cases of dependence, abuse, and misuse have also been reported in many patients treated with these drugs for a long time.
as an anxiolytic (low dose) or hypnotic (high dose). Therefore, in routine clinical practice, the dosage must always be “individualized” in each patient to nd the lowest
receptor. The peak plasma concentration is attained 1–2 h after intake.
A
Overall, it is worthwhile to remember that each BDZ can act at different dosages