Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5390_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •About the Book
- •Contents
- •1.2.3 Ceramic Biomaterials
- •1.2.4 Composite Biomaterials
- •1.2.5 Nanocellulose
- •1.3.1 Biocompatible Proteins
- •1: Sustainable Green Biomaterials in Drug Delivery
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classification
- •1.2.1 Metallic Biomaterials
- •1.2.2 Polymeric Biomaterials
- •1.3.2 Composites (Cellulose, Chitosan, and Chitin)
- •1.3.3 Hydroxyapatite-Starch Based Biomaterials
- •1.3.4 Carbonaceous Materials
- •1.4 Perspective
- •1.4.1 Current Recycling Strategies
- •1.4.2 Dental and Orthopedic Implants
- •1.4.3 Medical Plastic Waste
- •1.4.4 Sterilization and Reusability
- •1.4.5 Waste Management for Recycling
- •1.5 Conclusion and Future Challenges
- •References
- •2: Prospects of Biodegradable Material: Sustainable and Patient-Centric Approach in the Realm of Biomedical Engineering
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Sustainable Green Biomaterials
- •2.2.1 Naturally Derived Polymers and Polymer Substrates
- •2.2.1.1 Protein Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.2 Polysaccharides Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.3 Hydroxyapatite Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.4 Carbonaceous Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.2 Synthetic Polymer Substrate
- •2.2.3 Biodegradable Metal Substrates
- •2.4 Bio-degradable Piezoelectrics for Medical Implants
- •2.5.1 Wound Healing
- •2.5.2 Drug Delivery Systems
- •2.5.2.1 Nano-based Drug Delivery Systems
- •2.5.2.2 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •2.5.2.3 Solid-Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs)
- •2.5.2.4 Liposomes
- •2.5.3 Medical Devices
- •2.5.3.1 Implants
- •2.5.3.2 Other Applications
- •2.7 Prospects and Conclusion
- •References
- •3: Strategies in Synthesis of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Natural Biopolymers
- •3.2.1 Polysaccharides
- •3.2.2 Polynucleotide
- •3.2.3 Polypeptides
- •3.3 Chemically Synthesized Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.1 Extraction Methods of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.2 Polymerization of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.3 Fermentation Method of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.4 Sonosynthesis of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.5 Solvent Casting Method of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.6 Electrospinning Method
- •References
- •4: Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health Care Applications
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose and Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.3 Producers of Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.3.1 Process of Bacterial Cellulose Synthesis
- •4.4 Probiotic Bacteria and Their Beneficial Effects
- •4.5 Methods of Synthesizing Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.6 Healthcare Applications of Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5: 3D Printing and 4D Printing: Sustainable Manufacturing Techniques for Green Biomaterials
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Fundamentals of 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.3 Biomaterials in 3D Bioprinting
- •5.3.1 Types of Polymers Used in 3D Bioprinting (Fig. 5.1)
- •5.3.1.1 Synthetic Polymers
- •Polylactic Acid (PLA)
- •Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)
- •5.4 Polyglycolic Acid (PGA)
- •5.5 Sustainability in 3D Printing
- •5.5.1 What Makes your Biomaterial more Sustainable?
- •5.6 Advancements in 4D Bioprinting
- •5.6.1 Smart Polymers
- •5.6.2 Applications of 4D Bio-Printing in Sustainable Manufacturing
- •5.7 Case Studies on 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.8 Challenges and Future Directions in 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.8.1 The Technical Challenges in 3D Bio-Printing Include
- •5.8.2 Challenges in 4D Bio-Printing
- •5.8.3 Future Directions
- •5.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •6: Proteins as Biocompatible Material for Biomedical Applications
- •6.2.6 Zein
- •6.3 Proteins as Adaptable and Biocompatible Building Blocks for Biomedical Applications in Biomaterials
- •6.4.1 Protein-Based Particle Systems
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Protein Materials
- •6.2.1 Keratin
- •6.2.2 Collagen
- •6.2.3 Elastin
- •6.2.4 Silk
- •6.2.5 Resilin
- •6.4.2 Protein-Based Hydrogels
- •6.4.3 Protein-Based Films
- •6.4.4 Protein Electrospun Fibers
- •6.4.5 Protein-Based Microneedles
- •6.4.6 Keratin Composites
- •6.4.7 Elastin Composites
- •6.4.8 Collagen Composites
- •6.5.1 Bone Healing
- •6.5.2 Antibiotic Release
- •6.5.3 Diabetes
- •6.5.4 Cancer Treatment
- •6.5.5 Neuroinflammation
- •6.5.6 Wound Healing
- •6.5.7 Corneal Regeneration
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •7: Graphene-Based Carbonaceous Materials: A Sustainable Biomaterial for Biomedical Application
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Graphene and Its Family
- •7.2.1 Structure of Graphene
- •7.2.2 Properties of Graphene-Based Biomaterials
- •7.2.3 Synthesis of Graphene Compounds
- •7.2.4 Applications of Graphene Compounds
- •7.3 Carbonaceous Materials in Biomedical Applications
- •7.3.1 Tissue Engineering
- •7.3.2 Biosensing
- •7.3.3 Drug Delivery
- •7.3.4 Smart Biomaterials
- •7.4 Biomaterials and Sustainability
- •7.4.1 Sustainability in Graphene-Based Materials
- •References
- •8: Green Approach for Synthesizing Silk Fibroin Biomaterial Scaffolds
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 Green Alternatives for Degumming
- •8.3.2 Green Alternative to Dissolution Techniques
- •8.3.3 Green Alternative to Fabrication Techniques
- •8.5 Applications of Silk Fibroin Biomaterial Scaffolds
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9: Green Catalysts in the Synthesis of Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Green Catalyst and Its Classification
- •9.2.1 Green Catalyst from the Light Source
- •9.2.2 Green Catalyst from Bio Source
- •9.2.3 Green Catalyst from Nanotechnology
- •9.2.4 Green Catalyst from Heteropolyacids
- •9.3 Biomedical Applications
- •9.3.1 Drug Delivery
- •9.3.2 Polymer Coating
- •9.3.3 Biosensor
- •9.3.4 Tissue Engineering
- •9.3.5 Wound Healing
- •9.3.6 Bioprinting
- •9.4 Methods Involved in the Synthesis of Green Catalyst
- •9.4.1 Green Solvent Synthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.2 Biosynthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.3 Electrochemical Synthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.4 Plasma Method
- •9.4.5 Ultrasonic-Aided Synthesis
- •9.4.6 Microwave-Aided Synthesis (MAS)
- •9.4.7 Alternative Green Methods
- •9.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •10: Utilisation of Plant Extracts for Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Silver Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.2 Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles
- •10.1.3 Synthesis Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.4 Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.5 Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle
- •10.1.6 Copper Oxide Nanoparticle
- •10.1.7 Palladium Nanoparticles
- •10.2 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.3 Sustainable Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Waste
- •11.3.1 Agri-Wastes
- •11.3.2 E-Wastes
- •11.3.3 Industrial-Wastes
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12: Metal Framework in Biosensor
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Synthesis of MOFs
- •12.3 Sensors
- •12.3.1 Various Types of Biosensors
- •12.3.1.1 Electrochemical Biosensors
- •12.3.1.2 Amperometric and Voltammetric Immunosensor
- •12.3.1.3 Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Biosensor
- •12.3.1.4 Aptamers
- •12.3.1.5 Field-Effect-Transistor-Based Sensors (FET)
- •12.3.1.6 MOF-Nanomaterials-Based Biosensors
- •12.3.1.7 Food Quality Monitoring
- •12.3.1.8 Environmental Analysis
- •12.3.1.9 Pesticide
- •12.3.1.10 Gas Sensors
- •12.3.1.11 Temperature Sensor
- •12.4 Diagnosis of Diseases
- •12.4.1 Cancer
- •12.4.2 Glucose Sensor
- •12.4.4 HIV Sensor
- •12.4.5 MOF Used for Optical Sensors
- •12.5 Conclusion and Future Perspective
- •References
- •13: Cellulose, Chitin, and Chitosan Composite-Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Structures of Cellulose, Chitin and Chitosan
- •13.2.1 Cellulose
- •13.2.2 Chitin
- •13.2.3 Chitosan
- •13.3.1 Cellulose Composite-Based Biomaterials
- •13.3.2 Chitin-Chitosan Composite-Based Biomaterials
- •13.5 Advantages and Disadvantages
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14: Sustainable Synthesis of Cellulose-Derived Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1 Overview of Cellulose-Derived Hydrogels
- •14.1.3 The Aim of this Chapter
- •14.2 The Sustainable Biomaterial of Cellulose
- •14.2.1 Cellulose Structure and Properties
- •14.2.2 Properties of Cellulose
- •14.2.3 Sources of Cellulose for Hydrogel Synthesis
- •14.2.4 Advantages of Using Cellulose-Derived Materials
- •14.3 Cellulose Hydrogel Formation Techniques
- •14.3.1 Synthesis Methods
- •14.3.1.1 Chemical Crosslinking Methods
- •14.3.1.2 Physical Crosslinking Methods
- •14.3.1.3 Hybrid Approaches
- •14.4 Tissue Engineering Applications
- •14.4.1 Scaffold Design Considerations
- •14.4.2 The Biocompatibility of Cellulose-Based Hydrogels
- •14.4.3 Case Studies of Tissue Engineering with Hydrogels Generated from Cellulose
- •14.5 Sustainability in Cellulose Hydrogel Synthesis
- •14.5.1 Green Synthesis Approaches
- •14.5.3 Assessment of the Life Cycle of Hydrogels Generated from Cellulose
- •14.6 Characterization Techniques
- •14.6.1 Structural Analysis
- •14.6.2 Mechanical Properties
- •14.6.3 Biodegradability Studies
- •14.7 Challenges and Future Directions
- •14.7.1 Current Limitations in Cellulose-Based Hydrogel Technology
- •14.7.2 Opportunities for Further Research and Development
- •14.8 Conclusion
- •14.8.1 Summary of Key Points
- •14.8.2 Implications for the Field of Tissue Engineering
- •14.8.3 Recommendations for Future Work
- •References
- •15: Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Hydroxyapatite
- •15.2.1 Biomedical Applications of Hydroxyapatite
- •15.3 Starch
- •15.3.1 Sources, Structure and Properties of Starch
- •15.3.2 Biomedical Applications of Starch
- •15.5 Synthesis Techniques for HA-Starch Composites
- •15.5.1 Electrospinning
- •15.5.2 Sol-Gel
- •15.5.3 Thermally Induced Phase Separation
- •15.6 Starch-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •15.8 Hydroxyapatite-Starch Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •15.10 Future Perspectives and Challenges
- •15.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •16: Surfactant-Free Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanomaterials: Sustainable and Eco-Synthesis Methods
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.1 Solvent-Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.1 N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.2 Ethylene Glycol Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.3 Benzyl Alcohol Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.4 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2 Simple Ion Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.1 Citrate Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.2 Amino Acid Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.3 Iodide Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.4 Buffer Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.3 Physical Process-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.2.3.1 Photochemically-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.2.3.2 Sonochemically Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.3.3 Laser Ablation-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.3.1 Synthetic Catalysis
- •16.3.2 Electrocatalysis
- •16.3.3 Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
- •16.4 Challenges, Limitation, and Future Perspective
- •16.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •Index

386 C. Chapa
sustainability lies. While these are not chemical synthesis methods, they can be
treated by chemical methods such as grinding to fine particles. You can also choose
to adapt traditional methods to move towards greener chemistry. In this same sense,
we can highlight that starch is a biodegradable polymer that is obtained in a
sustainable way from various plants, this polymer is a great example of sustainable
methods of obtaining, because it can be obtained even from vegetab
of industrial
tal objectives is obtained as a benefit interesting drug delivery system (Kurczewska
2022). Accordingly, the combination of these materials using environmentally
friendly methods would
even be designed to combine them where properties like crystallinity, particle size,
porosity, morphology, among others that are determinants of drug release efficacy
are controlled, given that pharmaceutical results require their precise control.
processes of food production, in addition to aligning with environmen-
result in highly sustainable solutions. Methodologies can
le waste product
15.7 Properties That the Biomaterial Seeks to Be a Drug
Delivery System
It is well recognized that individual materials can act collaboratively, and the
properties of the combined material can act in concordance. In that sense, it is
expected that hydroxyapatite combined with starch will offer synergistic properties
for drug delivery systems whose final properties will be a result of a mutual
interaction of both materials. In principle, both materials can present to a greater
or lesser extent crystallinity that would affect the adsorption capacity or encapsulation efficiency and the rate of drug release or release kinetics. We could be in the
presence of a hydroxyapatite with high crystallinity that presents a slower and
sustained release, which is not necessarily detrimental if what is sought is a therapeutic application by sustained release action over time. Particle size is also a
property that should not be left to chance because it plays an important role. In
general, it has been accepted that smaller particles have a larger surface area, which
can be used to increase the absorption rate of the drug. As for starch, we cannot fail
to mention that its structure is anything but consistent between sources, let alone the
degree of cross-linking, which can influence the release kinetics. However, by
predictably characterizing the starch to be worked with, we could know if it has a
denser and more cross-linked structure which would be beneficial in slowing down
the release of the drug for sustained release (Lukova et al. 2023).
Therefore,
starch matrices requires control of several other important parameters such as size
and morphology, which ultimately affect the encapsulation efficiency and drug
release kinetics. Particle size and morphology are both parameters that can be
tunable during synthesis and can definitely impact on the biodistribution and bioavailability of the drug (Ren et al. 2021). To be precise, encapsulation efficiency
refers to the amount of drug that can be incorporated into the matrix and is a key
factor in ensuring adequate therapeutic doses, while release kinetics, on the other
hand, determines the rate at which the drug is released from the material. All reports
to achieve drug encapsulation in hydroxyapatite in combination with

15 Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials 387
of release systems using this combination, and others, should report these parameters
and relate them to the properties we have mentioned, in order to be able to compare
and make decisions to obtain the biomaterial that is most appropriate for the
treatment of chronic diseases that require sustained release.
Consequently, among the properties that the combination of these biomaterials
should be carefully observed are:
(a) Crystallinity: To call crystallinity in both hydroxyapatite and starch is to refer
to one of the properties that both shares. Crystallinity, as is well known, affects
mechanical strength, degradation rate, interaction with surrounding water
molecules. On the one hand, high crystallinity in hydroxyapatite would result
in high stability and bioactivity, although it is unlikely to relate bioactivity to
drug release, it is plausible that crystallinity also determines prolonged drug
release. On the other hand, crystallinity in starch is associated with amylopectin
containing and the amorphous phase with amylose. And given that the content
of both polymers depends on the nature of the source, this will have a decisive
influence on the ability to form stable and uniform matrices for drug
encapsulation.
(b) Particle size:
Particle
size is closely related to drug loading capacity and release
kinetics. Smaller particles typically have a larger surface area for drug adsorption, leading to higher drug loading efficiency. Even the particle size distribution
influences the release profile of encapsulated drugs. In the case of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, they can be obtained in various sizes and sieved to reduce
their size distribution, aiming for smaller particle sizes to be associated with
higher drug loading and capacity for controlled release. It is difficult to find
reports of starch particle sizes in the nanometer scale when they are obtained
from their sources, regularly the materials are microstructured. But through
physical or chemical processes, particle sizes in the nanometer scale can be
achieved.
(c)
Porosity: Matr
ices formed by polymers that produce porous structures in which
the drug is disseminated allow the drug to infiltrate into the pores of the matrix
system, followed by a slow diffusion step of the drugs in the channels. The ratelimiting step in drug release from this type of system is the penetration of the
dissolution liquid into the matrix, with water permeation promoted by the
addition of wetting agents. The increased surface area resulting from the porosity of the nanohydroxyapatite may contribute to the ability of a matrix to load
drugs. As for starch, in addition to the structural and biological properties
already mentioned, it is also possible to functionalize its surface, making it
more efficient and selective as a drug-carrying matrix, since the anchoring of
functional groups on porous matrices causes changes in pore size and drugsubstrate interaction, resulting in lower drug loading and a slower release rate,
which is desirable. Not to be omitted that the release of the active ingredient is
essentially controlled by diffusion mechanisms through the pores or by erosion,
in addition to hydrolysis in the case of hydrophilic polymers with one or the
other mechanism prevailing depending on the properties of the drug.

388 C. Chapa
15.8 Hydroxyapatite-Starch Based Drug Delivery Systems
In the existing literature there are formulations that already incorporate hydroxyapatite and starch for drug delivery. Table
recent publications where several formulations incorporating hydroxyapatite-starch
based materials were developed to assess their efficacy in drug delivery systems
covering from antibiotics to glucocoticoids. As can be seen, the frameworks were
designed to improve specific properties of the drug release studies, in general the
release profiles were better in the systems that took advantage of the unique
properties of the composites.
It is clear from the data presented in Table 15.1 that a ternary mixture of
polylactic acid (PLA), starch and poly ε-caprolactone (PCL) was used alongside
nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) by fusion. Although the resulting nanocomposite does
not exclusively combine hydroxyapatite with starch, its mention in this discussion is
not misplaced, as it should be noted that the composite with 3% nHA demonstrated
better hydrolytic degradation, higher hydrophilicity, greater antibacterial activity and
optimized triclosan release profiles (Davachi et al. 2017). Triclosan is an antiseptic
agent which belongs to the chemical group of polychlorinated phenoxyphenols. It is
effective against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, fungi and molds. It is a
regulated ingredient commonly found in medicines, soaps, lotions, deodorants and
toothpastes.
Yet another formulation hydroxyapatite was combined with β-C D to carry
dexamethasone, a hydrophobic drug. Again, hydroxyapatite is not directly combi ned
with starch, but this example is particularly interesting because cyclodextrins are
produced from starch by enzymatic conversion, which is why they are sometimes
15.1 presents a summarized overview of
Table 15.1 Formulations of drug delivery system based on hydroxyapatite combined with starch
Formulation Drug Results Ref.
Polylactic acid/starch/poly
ε-caprolactone, mixed with
nano hydroxyapatite (nHA)
via melt blending
Hydroxyapatite (HA)/
Cyclodextrin (β-CD)
nanocomposite
Dispersion of hydroxyapatite
into urea and thermoplastic
starch at
HA and
phosphate based porous
scaffolds formed by applying
together starch consolidation
with foaming method
nanoscale
pure β-
tri calcium
Triclosan 3% nHA increases material’s
Dexamethasone The release of dexamethasone
Urea (fertilizer) Study
Ceftriaxone HAp exhibited better drug
degradation, antibacterial
action, and drug release.
from β-CD/HA was about
pH 5.3
4.6% at
pH 7.4.
shows breaking up
hydroxyapatite particles and
dispersing them in watersoluble materials improves
how well phosphate releases
release profile than β- tri
calcium phosphate when drug
was used alone
and 18.7% at
Davachi
et al.
(2017)
Salimi
and
Molaei
(2021)
Giroto
et al.
(2015)
Kundu
et al.
(2010)

15 Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials 389
also called “cycloamylases”. These compounds are used in food, pharmaceuticals,
drug delivery systems. Moreover, in this work the nanocomposite showed
pH-sensitive drug release, with a release of 4.6% at pH 5.3 and 18.7% at pH 7.4,
consequently, it is highlighted that the system functions as a pH-sensitive sustainable
release carrier for the hydrophobic Drug (Salimi and Molaei
is a
drug belonging to the glucocorticoid class. It mainly can treat diseases of
). Dexamethasone
2021
rheumatic, immune, skin, ocular, endocrine, pulmonary, blood, gastrointestinal,
neurological and neoplastic origin. Dexamethasone has an anti-inflammatory action
due to the inhibition of phospholipase A2, which causes the inhibition of the entire
arachidonic acid cascade, impeding the formation of prostaglandin, thromboxane
and leukotrienes. In addition, they al
leukocytes,
thus reducing the release of cytokines at the site of inflammation,
so act by reducing the migration and adhesion of
resulting in immunosuppressive activity.
In a different approach, the incorporation of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles into
thermoplastic starch matrices was explored by the authors. The thermoplastic starch
has an amylose content higher than 70% and are gelatinized vegetable starch based.
With the use of specific plasticizing solvents, can produce thermoplastic materials
with good performance properties and inherent biodegradability. The starch is
typically plasticized, unstructured or blended with other materials to form useful
mechanical properties. Although generally, the applications of thermoplastic starch
polymers are generally films, such as shopping bags, bread bags, bait bags,
wrapping, “washable” medical device backing material and mulch film, their inclusion in a delivery system, not for drugs, but for compounds of interest is noteworthy
as well as sustainable. The biodegradation of starch-based polymers is the result of
an enzymatic attack on the glycosidic bonds between the carbohydrate groups
leading to a reduction in chain length and the cleavage of the carbohydrate units
into monosaccharides, disaccharides and oligosaccharides, which are readily utilized
in biochemical pathways. The work aimed to improve the solubility of poorly
soluble phosphate phases. It was revealed that the dispersion of HAp within the
matrices improved phosphate release and the influence of hydroxyapatite particles
and their dispersion in water soluble materials was demonstrated to significantly
improve phosphate release. This improved release profile heralds that the combined
material increases fert ilizer efficacy by achieving a more sustained release of
nutrients (Giroto et al. 2015).
Previously,
the use of porous hydroxyapatite (HAp) and β-tricalcium phosphate
(β-TCP) scaffolds fabricated by a starch consolidation and foaming method had
already been reported. For that reason, this study is also incorporated in this analysis,
since it combines both materials that we have been mentioning, this time the study
was about the local administration of ceftriaxone in the treatment of osteomyelitis As
mentioned before, the porosity of the materials is one of the main proper ties to be
controlled and in this study the importance of high porosity and interconnectivity in
the release of the drug was highlighted. Ceftriaxone was incorporated into the
scaffolds and the results showed that hydroxyapatite provided a better drug release
profile than β-TCP when used alone (Kundu et al.
010). Ceftriaxone is a broad-
2
spectrum injectable antibiotic used to eliminate excess bacteria in the body and can

390 C. Chapa
therefore be used to treat various types of infections, from sexually transmitted
infections to skin infections, pneumonia and even meningitis.
15.9 Strategies for Drug Incorporation
in Hydroxyapatite-Starch Compounds
Studies where drug incorporation into hydroxyapatite (HA)-starch composites will
certainly continue to appear in the literature in the coming years. Conducting these
investigations would involve various strategies designed to optimize drug loading
and release profiles that take into account the properties of the composite. For
example, the common approach of co-precipitation would incorporate drugs during
the synthesis of the starch and HA composite. With this method, a uniform distribution of the drug within the composite matrix would be sought. Perhaps the most
obvious or most commonly used strategy is surface adsorption, whereby drugs are
adsorbed on the surface of the preformed hydroxyapatite particles combined with
starch through weak bonds. This technique would be particularly useful for drugs
that have a strong affinity for the starch or hydroxyapatite surface. On the other hand,
encapsulation techniques should be considered, the starch polymer lends itself to
form a layer around the hydroxyapatite particles containing adsorbed drug or the two
separately. This method of encapsulation can protect drugs from premature degradation and allow a sustained release over time, the role of hydroxyapatite would also
play to that end.
most, if not all, nanomedicine drug delivery systems, the kinetics of drug
As in
release from HA starch composites will be influenced by several factors, including as
mentioned above the porosity and crystallinity of the composite, the properties of the
drug and the interaction between the drug and the composite matrix. Drug release is
anticipated to occur through a combination of diffusion, degradation and dissolution
mechanisms. Initially, a burst release would occur due to the release of adsorbed
drug at or near the surface of the composite, this is usually seen by a steep slope in
graphs plotting the amount of drug released as a function of time. This first phase is
usually followed by a more sustained release phase in which the drug encapsulated
within the matrix is gradually released as the compound degrades, keep in mind that
it is the starch that is expected to degrade, the hydroxyapatite less often. Again it is
important to emphasize that higher porosity allows for higher drug loading and
facilitates faster drug diffusion, but it will also depend on several properties such as
the molecular mass of the drug and stereochemistry. Returning to the rate of starch
degradation, it must be said that this will affect drug release as the starch degrades in
compartments where amylase enzymes are presen t, when degraded it would create
channels that allow drug diffusion, contributing to the sustained release phase, these
release profiles could present interesting kinetics.

15 Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials 391
15.10 Future Perspectives and Challenges
Despite their promising potential, hydroxyapatite composites in combination with
starch face several limitations in drug delivery applications. An important limitation
is the chemical resistance of hydroxyapatite. While hydroxyapatite provides some
structural integrity, routes of administration must be chosen in accordance with the
idea that hydroxyapatite is unlikely to degrade under physiological conditions.
While the incorporation of starch may provide elements of degradability, the overall
strength of the composite in particular would be determined by the persistence of the
hydroxyapatite, which is perhaps why studies are focusing on bone or dental
applications. In any case, achieving a balance between the degradation of the starch
component and the stability of the hydroxyapatite is a fundamental limitation to be
overcome in the future to advance this topic. To address these limitations,
researchers can resort to surface modification techniques, size control, etc. to promote better properties.
15.11 Conclusion
In conclusion, hydroxyapatite composites combined with starch definitely represent
a sustainable approach to drug delivery. However, their potential application as a
nanomedicine system for controlled drug release is still not being harnessed for the
potentially wide range of medical applications that could benefit from the combination of biocompatibility, bioactivity and other capabilities. What it is clear is that
innovations in composite formulation, manufacturing techniques will further
enhance their functionality and versatility by adopting green methods so that, as
these materials continue to evolve, sustainable options with great potential for drug
delivery will offer efficient and affordable solutions to complex medical challenges.
References
Ab’lah NN et al (2023) Reinvention of starch for oral drug delivery system design. Int J Biol
Macromol 241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2023.124506
Abka-khajouei R et al (2022) Structures, properties and applications of alginates. Mar Drugs 20(6).
Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/MD20060364
Acevedo-Guevara L et al (2018) Development of native and modified banana starch nanoparticles
as vehicles for curcumin. Int J Biol Macromol 111:498–504. Available at: https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2018.01.063
Ahamed A
derived hydroxyapatite and montmorillonite blended sodium alginate composite for in-vitro
drug delivery studies. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 32(10):3902–3922. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1007/S10904-022-02401-1/METRICS
Ali KA et al (2021) Starch-based nanomaterials in drug delivery applications. In: Biopolymer-based
nanomaterials in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Academic Press, London,
pp 31–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820874-8.00023-3
animohan M, Kalaivasan N (2022) Fabrication of biologically active fish bone
F, M

392 C. Chapa
Alvarez-Barreto J et al (2017) Mesenchymal stem cell culture on composite hydrogels of hydroxy-
apatite nanoparticles and photo-crosslinking
Biomedica 38(3):524–536. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.38.3.2
Alvarez-Barreto JF et al (2021) Development of films, based on oxidized Ipomea Batatas starch,
with protein encapsulation. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica 42(2):119–131.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.42.2.10
Ambrosio JAR et al (2023) Hydroxyapatite microspheres used as a drug delivery system for
gliosarcoma strain 9l/Lacz treatment by photodynamic therapy protocols. Photodiagn Photodyn
Ther 44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PDPDT.2023.103830
Anaya-Barajas D et al (2019) Biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration extracted from fish wastes.
Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica 40(3):1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17488/
RMIB.40.3.13
Asghar MS et al (2023) In vitro controlled drug delivery of cationic substituted hydroxyapatite
nanoparticles; enhanced anti-chelating and antibacterial response. Kuwait J Sci 50(2):97–104.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KJS.2023.02.014
Averous L, Halley PJ (2014) Starch polymers: from the field to industrial products. In: Starch
polymers: from genetic engineering to green applications. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 3–10.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53730-0.00018-X
Azfaralariff A et al (2020) Food-grade particle stabilized pickering emulsion using modified sago
(Metroxylon sagu) starch nanocrystal. J Food Eng 280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
JFOODENG.2020.109974
Barclay TG et al (2019) Review of polysaccharide particle-based functional drug delivery.
Carbohydr Polym 221:94–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2019.05.067
Beh CY, Cheng EM, Mohd Nasir NF, Eng SK et al (2021a) Dielectric and material analysis on
physicochemical activity of porous hydroxyapatite/cornstarch composites. Int J Biol Macromol
166:1543–1553. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.11.034
Beh CY, Cheng EM, Mohd Nasir NF, Khor SF et al (2021b) Low frequency dielectric and optical
behavior on physicochemical properties of hydroxyapatite/cornstarch composite. J Colloid
Interface Sci 600:187–198. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCIS.2021.03.158
Bose S et al (2022) Allicin-loaded hydroxyapatite: enhanced release, Cytocompatibility, and
antibacterial properties for bone tissue engineering applications. JOM 74(9):3349–3356.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11837-022-05366-1
Castrejón-Parga KY et al (2015) Chitosan-starch film reinforced with magnetite-decorated carbon
nanotubes. J Alloys Compd 615(S1):S505–S510. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jallcom.2013.12.269
Chen J et al (2020) Preparation, characterization, physicochemical property and potential applica-
tion of porous starch: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 148:1169–1181. Available at: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.055
Choi I, Li N, Zhong Q (2022) Enhancing bioaccessibility of resveratrol by loading in natural porous
starch microparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 194:982–992. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
IJBIOMAC.2021.11.157
Davachi SM et al (2017) Interface modified polylactic acid/starch/poly ε-caprolactone antibacterial
nanocomposite blends for medical applications. Carbohydr Polym 155:336–344. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2016.08.037
liveira C
de O
physicochemical characteristics and mucoadhesive potential of gellan gum/retrograded starch
microparticles as a platform for colonic drug release. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 55. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2019.101445
Devanand Venkatasubbu
apatite as carrier material for controlled delivery of ciprofloxacin. 3 Biotech 1(3):173–
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S13205-011-0021-9
ardoso VM et al (2020) Insights into the impact of cross-linking processes on
G et al (2011) Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and zinc-doped hydroxy-
chitosan. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria
186.

15 Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials 393
Diaz Varela JY et al (2024) The role of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in enhancing the hydrolysis
and thermal stability of PLA. Sci Rep 14(1):1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-
024-58755-8
Fatimah I et al (2021) Biosynthesized gold
antioxidant nanocomposite. Mater Res Express 8(11). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/
2053-1591/AC3309
Fazal T et al (2023) Recent developments in natural biopolymer based drug delivery systems. RSC
Advances 13(33):23087. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA03369D
Flores Valdez JD et al (2022) Hydroxyapatite and biopolymer composites with promising biomedi-
cal applications. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica 43(2):6–23. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.43.2.1
Friuli V et al (2024) Hydroxyapatite nanorods based drug delivery systems for Bumetanide and
Meloxicam, poorly water soluble active principles. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 14(1).
Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO14010113
Gaona CGC et al (2023) Novel studies in the designs of natural, synthetic, and compound hydrogels
with biomedical applications. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica 44(2):74–96.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.44.2.6
García-Guzmán L et al (2022) Progress in starch-based materials for food packaging applications.
Polysaccharides 3(1):136–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYSACCHARIDES
3010007
Ghorbani F et al (2019) A facile method to synthesize mussel-inspired polydopamine nanospheres
as an active template for in situ formation of biomimetic hydroxyapatite. Mater Sci Eng C 94:
729–739. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2018.10.010
Giroto AS, Fidélis SC, Ribeiro C (2015) Controlled release from hydroxyapatite nanoparticles
incorporated into biodegradable, soluble host matrixes. RSC Advances 5(126):104179–104186.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA17669G
González-Torres V et al (2021) Antibacterial activity analysis of hydroxyapatite based materials
with fluorine and silver. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica 42(2):49–57. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.42.2.4
Gui X et al (2022) Synthesis and application of nanometer hydroxyapatite in biomedicine.
Nanotechnol Rev 11(1):2154–2168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/NTREV-2022-0127
Hong Y et al (2011) Study on physicochemical characteristics of waxy potato starch in comparison
with other waxy starches. Starch Stärke 63(12):754–759. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/
STAR.201100013
Hosseinzadeh H, Ramin S (2018) Fabrication of starch-graft-poly(acrylamide)/graphene oxide/
hydroxyapatite nanocomposite hydrogel adsorbent for removal of malachite green dye from
aqueous solution. Int J Biol Macromol 106:101–115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
IJBIOMAC.2017.07.182
Huq T et al (2017) Alginate based nanocomposite for microencapsulation of probiotic: effect of
cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) and lecithin. Carbohydr Polym 168:61–69. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.032
Kamaly N et al (2016) Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles:
mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev 116(4):2602–2663. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.5B00346
Kedir WM et al (2022) Pharmaceutical and drug delivery applications of chitosan biopolymer and
its modified nanocomposite: a review. Heliyon 8(8). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
HELIYON.2022.E10196
Khalf A
Kim HY,
adihally SV (2017) Recent advances in multiaxial electrospinning for drug delivery. Eur
, M
J Pharm Biopharm 112:1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPB.2016.11.010
Park SS, Lim ST (2015) Preparation, characterization and utilization of starch
nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 126:607–620. Available at: https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.COLSURFB.2014.11.011
nanoparticles-doped hydroxyapatite as antibacterial and

394 C. Chapa
Koski C, Bose S (2019) Effects of amylose content on the mechanical properties of starch-
hydroxyapatite 3D printed bone scaffolds. Addit Manuf 30:100817. Available at: https://doi.
org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2019.100817
Koski C et al (2018) Starch-hydroxyapatite composite
extrusion-based solid freeform fabricator. Addit Manuf 24:47–59. Available at: https://doi.org/
10.1016/J.ADDMA.2018.08.030
Kundu B et al (2010) Development of porous HAp and β-TCP scaffolds by starch consolidation
with foaming method and drug-chitosan bilayered scaffold based drug delivery system. J Mater
Sci Mater Med 21(11):2955–2969. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10856-010-4127-0
Kurczewska J (2022) Recent reports on polysaccharide-based materials for drug delivery. Polymers
14(19). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14194189
Le TDH et al (2023) Hydroxyapatite-loaded starch/polyvinyl alcohol scaffold for bone regenera-
tion application: preparation and characterization. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 107(2):441–451.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10971-023-06137-3
Lemos PVF et al (2021) Starch chemical modifications applied to drug delivery systems: from
fundamentals to FDA-approved raw materials. Int J Biol Macromol 184:218–234. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2021.06.077
Lukova P, Katsarov P, Pilicheva B (2023) Application of starch, cellulose, and their derivatives in
the development of microparticle drug-delivery systems. Polymers 15(17):3615. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM15173615
Mahdavinia GR et al (2019) In vitro evaluation of sustained ciprofloxacin release from
κ-carrageenan-crosslinked chitosan/hydroxyapatite hydrogel nanocomposites. Int J Biol
Macromol 126:443–453. Available at:. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2018.12.240
Mao S et al (2004) Intranasal administration of melatonin starch microspheres. Int J Pharm
272(1–2):37–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2003.11.028
Marouf N, Nojehdehian H, Ghorbani F (2020) Physicochemical properties of chitosan–hydroxyap-
atite matrix incorporated with Ginkgo biloba-loaded PLGA microspheres for tissue engineering
applications. Polym Polym Compos 28(5):320–330. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/
0967391119874972
Marto J, Ribeiro HM, Almeida AJ (2020) Starch-based nanocapsules as drug carriers for topical
drug delivery. In: Smart nanocontainers: micro and nano technologies. Springer, Singapore, pp
287–294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816770-0.00017-4
Miculescu F et al (2017) Progress in hydroxyapatite-starch based sustainable biomaterials for
biomedical bone substitution applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(10):8491–8512.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.7B02314
Mohd Roslan MR et al (2021) The state of starch/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold in bone tissue
engineering with consideration for dielectric measurement as an alternative characterization
technique. Materials 14(8). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/MA14081960
Morán JI, Vázquez A, Cyras VP (2013) Bio-nanocomposites based on derivatized potato starch and
cellulose, preparation and characterization. J Mater Sci 48(20):7196–7203. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1007/S10853-013-7536-X
Mundargi RC et al (2008) Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of novel starch-based tableted
microspheres for controlled release of ampicillin. Carbohydr Polym 71(1):42–53.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2007.05.013
Munir MU et al (2022) Synthesis, characterization, functionalization and bio-applications of
hydroxyapatite nanomaterials: an overview. Int J Nanomedicine 17:1903–1925. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S360670
Murugan E
substituted hydroxyapatite: a comparative study for bone tissue engineering application. Int J
Biol Macromol 248:125927. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2023.125927
Mweta DE
(Colocasia esculenta) grown in Malawi. J Sci Food Agric 90(11):1886–1896. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1002/JSFA.4029
kshata CR (2023) Dextrose, maltose and starch guide crystallization of strontium-
, A
et al (2010) Isolation and physicochemical characterisation of starch from cocoyam
bone scaffold fabrication utilizing a slurry

15 Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials 395
Naveenkumar R, Senthilvelan S, Karthikeyan B (2023) A review on the recent developments in
electrospinned nanofibers for drug delivery.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S44174-023-00121-9
Nur-Azzah ABT et al (2022) A review on poly lactic acid (PLA) as a biodegradable polymer. Polym
Bull 80(2):1179–1213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00289-022-04160-Y
Obireddy SR, Lai WF (2021) Preparation and characterization of 2-hydroxyethyl starch
microparticles for co-delivery of multiple bioactive agents. Drug Deliv 28(1):1562–1568.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.1955043
Okunlola A, Ghomorai T (2018) Development of ibuprofen microspheres using acetylated plantain
starches as polymer for sustained release. J Pharm Investig 48(5):551–564. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1007/S40005-017-0345-5
Ordon K et al (2019) Examining the effect of starch and hydroxyapatite crosslinking on the thermal
properties of polyurethane-based biomaterials. Thermochim Acta 682:178414. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TCA.2019.178414
Pal A et al (2024) Fabrication of ciprofloxacin-immobilized calcium phosphate particles for dental
drug delivery. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 17(9). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/
MA17092035
Pandey A et al (2018) Antioxidant and antibacterial hydroxyapatite-based biocomposite for ortho-
pedic applications. Mater Sci Eng C 88:13–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.
2018.02.014
Pariy IO et al (2022) Hybrid biodegradable electrospun scaffolds based on poly(l-lactic acid) and
reduced graphene oxide with improved piezoelectric response. Poly J 54(10):1237–1252.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-022-00669-1
Ragab HS et al (2014) Synthesis and in vitro antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite
nanoparticles. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci 9(1):77–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9790/
3008-09167785
Ren N et al (2021) Preparation of rutin-loaded microparticles by debranched lentil starch-based wall
materials: structure, morphology and in vitro release behavior. Int J Biol Macromol 173:293–
306. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2021.01.122
Rosch JG et al (2019) Inverse-micelle synthesis of doxorubicin-loaded alginate/chitosan
nanoparticles and in vitro assessment of breast cancer cytotoxicity. Colloid Interface Sci
Commun 28:69–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2018.12.002
Rydell N, Stertman L, Sjöholm I (2005) Starch microparticles as vaccine adjuvant. Expert Opin
Drug Deliv 2(5):807–828. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.5.807
Salimi E, Molaei MJ (2021) Preparation and in-vitro evaluation of β-CD/HA nanocomposite as a
potential carrier for hydrophobic drugs. J Biomater Appl 36(2):246–251. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1177/08853282211012289
Santillana-Marín RA et al (2018) Bioactivity and hemolysis test of hydroxyapatite/zirconia
composites (HAp/ZrO2-8Y2O3) for bone implants. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica
39(3):272–280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.39.3.5
Sathyan S, Nisha P (2022) Optimization and characterization of porous starch from corn starch and
application studies in emulsion stabilization. Food Bioprocess Technol 15(9):2084–2099.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11947-022-02843-Y
Shaikh MAJ et al (2022) Sodium alginate based drug delivery in management of breast cancer.
Carbohydr Polym 292. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2022.119689
Singh G, Singh RP, Jolly SS (2020) Customized hydroxyapatites for bone-tissue engineering and
drug delivery applications: a review. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 94(3):505–530. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1007/S10971-020-05222-1
Song W et al (2018) Magnetic alginate/chitosan nanoparticles for targeted delivery of curcumin into
human breast cancer cells. Nano 8(11):907. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8110907
Sriprapha P
et al (2024) Induced porous structure with a slight change in mechanical properties of
hydroxyapatite-based nanocomposites synthesized from waste bovine bone and their
Biomed Mater Device 2(1):342–364. Available at:
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
