Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5390_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •About the Book
- •Contents
- •1.2.3 Ceramic Biomaterials
- •1.2.4 Composite Biomaterials
- •1.2.5 Nanocellulose
- •1.3.1 Biocompatible Proteins
- •1: Sustainable Green Biomaterials in Drug Delivery
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classification
- •1.2.1 Metallic Biomaterials
- •1.2.2 Polymeric Biomaterials
- •1.3.2 Composites (Cellulose, Chitosan, and Chitin)
- •1.3.3 Hydroxyapatite-Starch Based Biomaterials
- •1.3.4 Carbonaceous Materials
- •1.4 Perspective
- •1.4.1 Current Recycling Strategies
- •1.4.2 Dental and Orthopedic Implants
- •1.4.3 Medical Plastic Waste
- •1.4.4 Sterilization and Reusability
- •1.4.5 Waste Management for Recycling
- •1.5 Conclusion and Future Challenges
- •References
- •2: Prospects of Biodegradable Material: Sustainable and Patient-Centric Approach in the Realm of Biomedical Engineering
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Sustainable Green Biomaterials
- •2.2.1 Naturally Derived Polymers and Polymer Substrates
- •2.2.1.1 Protein Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.2 Polysaccharides Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.3 Hydroxyapatite Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.1.4 Carbonaceous Sustainable Biomaterials
- •2.2.2 Synthetic Polymer Substrate
- •2.2.3 Biodegradable Metal Substrates
- •2.4 Bio-degradable Piezoelectrics for Medical Implants
- •2.5.1 Wound Healing
- •2.5.2 Drug Delivery Systems
- •2.5.2.1 Nano-based Drug Delivery Systems
- •2.5.2.2 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •2.5.2.3 Solid-Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs)
- •2.5.2.4 Liposomes
- •2.5.3 Medical Devices
- •2.5.3.1 Implants
- •2.5.3.2 Other Applications
- •2.7 Prospects and Conclusion
- •References
- •3: Strategies in Synthesis of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Natural Biopolymers
- •3.2.1 Polysaccharides
- •3.2.2 Polynucleotide
- •3.2.3 Polypeptides
- •3.3 Chemically Synthesized Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.1 Extraction Methods of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.2 Polymerization of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.3 Fermentation Method of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.4 Sonosynthesis of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.5 Solvent Casting Method of Biodegradable Polymers
- •3.3.6 Electrospinning Method
- •References
- •4: Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose: A Bio-mediated Nanomaterial for Health Care Applications
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose and Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.3 Producers of Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.3.1 Process of Bacterial Cellulose Synthesis
- •4.4 Probiotic Bacteria and Their Beneficial Effects
- •4.5 Methods of Synthesizing Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.6 Healthcare Applications of Probiotic Bacterial Cellulose
- •4.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •5: 3D Printing and 4D Printing: Sustainable Manufacturing Techniques for Green Biomaterials
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Fundamentals of 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.3 Biomaterials in 3D Bioprinting
- •5.3.1 Types of Polymers Used in 3D Bioprinting (Fig. 5.1)
- •5.3.1.1 Synthetic Polymers
- •Polylactic Acid (PLA)
- •Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)
- •5.4 Polyglycolic Acid (PGA)
- •5.5 Sustainability in 3D Printing
- •5.5.1 What Makes your Biomaterial more Sustainable?
- •5.6 Advancements in 4D Bioprinting
- •5.6.1 Smart Polymers
- •5.6.2 Applications of 4D Bio-Printing in Sustainable Manufacturing
- •5.7 Case Studies on 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.8 Challenges and Future Directions in 3D and 4D Bioprinting
- •5.8.1 The Technical Challenges in 3D Bio-Printing Include
- •5.8.2 Challenges in 4D Bio-Printing
- •5.8.3 Future Directions
- •5.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •6: Proteins as Biocompatible Material for Biomedical Applications
- •6.2.6 Zein
- •6.3 Proteins as Adaptable and Biocompatible Building Blocks for Biomedical Applications in Biomaterials
- •6.4.1 Protein-Based Particle Systems
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Protein Materials
- •6.2.1 Keratin
- •6.2.2 Collagen
- •6.2.3 Elastin
- •6.2.4 Silk
- •6.2.5 Resilin
- •6.4.2 Protein-Based Hydrogels
- •6.4.3 Protein-Based Films
- •6.4.4 Protein Electrospun Fibers
- •6.4.5 Protein-Based Microneedles
- •6.4.6 Keratin Composites
- •6.4.7 Elastin Composites
- •6.4.8 Collagen Composites
- •6.5.1 Bone Healing
- •6.5.2 Antibiotic Release
- •6.5.3 Diabetes
- •6.5.4 Cancer Treatment
- •6.5.5 Neuroinflammation
- •6.5.6 Wound Healing
- •6.5.7 Corneal Regeneration
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •7: Graphene-Based Carbonaceous Materials: A Sustainable Biomaterial for Biomedical Application
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Graphene and Its Family
- •7.2.1 Structure of Graphene
- •7.2.2 Properties of Graphene-Based Biomaterials
- •7.2.3 Synthesis of Graphene Compounds
- •7.2.4 Applications of Graphene Compounds
- •7.3 Carbonaceous Materials in Biomedical Applications
- •7.3.1 Tissue Engineering
- •7.3.2 Biosensing
- •7.3.3 Drug Delivery
- •7.3.4 Smart Biomaterials
- •7.4 Biomaterials and Sustainability
- •7.4.1 Sustainability in Graphene-Based Materials
- •References
- •8: Green Approach for Synthesizing Silk Fibroin Biomaterial Scaffolds
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 Green Alternatives for Degumming
- •8.3.2 Green Alternative to Dissolution Techniques
- •8.3.3 Green Alternative to Fabrication Techniques
- •8.5 Applications of Silk Fibroin Biomaterial Scaffolds
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9: Green Catalysts in the Synthesis of Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Green Catalyst and Its Classification
- •9.2.1 Green Catalyst from the Light Source
- •9.2.2 Green Catalyst from Bio Source
- •9.2.3 Green Catalyst from Nanotechnology
- •9.2.4 Green Catalyst from Heteropolyacids
- •9.3 Biomedical Applications
- •9.3.1 Drug Delivery
- •9.3.2 Polymer Coating
- •9.3.3 Biosensor
- •9.3.4 Tissue Engineering
- •9.3.5 Wound Healing
- •9.3.6 Bioprinting
- •9.4 Methods Involved in the Synthesis of Green Catalyst
- •9.4.1 Green Solvent Synthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.2 Biosynthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.3 Electrochemical Synthesis Method of Catalyst
- •9.4.4 Plasma Method
- •9.4.5 Ultrasonic-Aided Synthesis
- •9.4.6 Microwave-Aided Synthesis (MAS)
- •9.4.7 Alternative Green Methods
- •9.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •10: Utilisation of Plant Extracts for Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Silver Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.2 Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles
- •10.1.3 Synthesis Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.4 Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles
- •10.1.5 Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle
- •10.1.6 Copper Oxide Nanoparticle
- •10.1.7 Palladium Nanoparticles
- •10.2 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.3 Sustainable Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Waste
- •11.3.1 Agri-Wastes
- •11.3.2 E-Wastes
- •11.3.3 Industrial-Wastes
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12: Metal Framework in Biosensor
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Synthesis of MOFs
- •12.3 Sensors
- •12.3.1 Various Types of Biosensors
- •12.3.1.1 Electrochemical Biosensors
- •12.3.1.2 Amperometric and Voltammetric Immunosensor
- •12.3.1.3 Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Biosensor
- •12.3.1.4 Aptamers
- •12.3.1.5 Field-Effect-Transistor-Based Sensors (FET)
- •12.3.1.6 MOF-Nanomaterials-Based Biosensors
- •12.3.1.7 Food Quality Monitoring
- •12.3.1.8 Environmental Analysis
- •12.3.1.9 Pesticide
- •12.3.1.10 Gas Sensors
- •12.3.1.11 Temperature Sensor
- •12.4 Diagnosis of Diseases
- •12.4.1 Cancer
- •12.4.2 Glucose Sensor
- •12.4.4 HIV Sensor
- •12.4.5 MOF Used for Optical Sensors
- •12.5 Conclusion and Future Perspective
- •References
- •13: Cellulose, Chitin, and Chitosan Composite-Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Structures of Cellulose, Chitin and Chitosan
- •13.2.1 Cellulose
- •13.2.2 Chitin
- •13.2.3 Chitosan
- •13.3.1 Cellulose Composite-Based Biomaterials
- •13.3.2 Chitin-Chitosan Composite-Based Biomaterials
- •13.5 Advantages and Disadvantages
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14: Sustainable Synthesis of Cellulose-Derived Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1 Overview of Cellulose-Derived Hydrogels
- •14.1.3 The Aim of this Chapter
- •14.2 The Sustainable Biomaterial of Cellulose
- •14.2.1 Cellulose Structure and Properties
- •14.2.2 Properties of Cellulose
- •14.2.3 Sources of Cellulose for Hydrogel Synthesis
- •14.2.4 Advantages of Using Cellulose-Derived Materials
- •14.3 Cellulose Hydrogel Formation Techniques
- •14.3.1 Synthesis Methods
- •14.3.1.1 Chemical Crosslinking Methods
- •14.3.1.2 Physical Crosslinking Methods
- •14.3.1.3 Hybrid Approaches
- •14.4 Tissue Engineering Applications
- •14.4.1 Scaffold Design Considerations
- •14.4.2 The Biocompatibility of Cellulose-Based Hydrogels
- •14.4.3 Case Studies of Tissue Engineering with Hydrogels Generated from Cellulose
- •14.5 Sustainability in Cellulose Hydrogel Synthesis
- •14.5.1 Green Synthesis Approaches
- •14.5.3 Assessment of the Life Cycle of Hydrogels Generated from Cellulose
- •14.6 Characterization Techniques
- •14.6.1 Structural Analysis
- •14.6.2 Mechanical Properties
- •14.6.3 Biodegradability Studies
- •14.7 Challenges and Future Directions
- •14.7.1 Current Limitations in Cellulose-Based Hydrogel Technology
- •14.7.2 Opportunities for Further Research and Development
- •14.8 Conclusion
- •14.8.1 Summary of Key Points
- •14.8.2 Implications for the Field of Tissue Engineering
- •14.8.3 Recommendations for Future Work
- •References
- •15: Hydroxyapatite-Starch-Based Sustainable Biomaterials
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Hydroxyapatite
- •15.2.1 Biomedical Applications of Hydroxyapatite
- •15.3 Starch
- •15.3.1 Sources, Structure and Properties of Starch
- •15.3.2 Biomedical Applications of Starch
- •15.5 Synthesis Techniques for HA-Starch Composites
- •15.5.1 Electrospinning
- •15.5.2 Sol-Gel
- •15.5.3 Thermally Induced Phase Separation
- •15.6 Starch-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •15.8 Hydroxyapatite-Starch Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •15.10 Future Perspectives and Challenges
- •15.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •16: Surfactant-Free Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanomaterials: Sustainable and Eco-Synthesis Methods
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.1 Solvent-Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.1 N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.2 Ethylene Glycol Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.3 Benzyl Alcohol Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.1.4 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2 Simple Ion Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.1 Citrate Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.2 Amino Acid Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.3 Iodide Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.2.4 Buffer Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.3 Physical Process-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.2.3.1 Photochemically-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.2.3.2 Sonochemically Assisted Synthesis
- •16.2.3.3 Laser Ablation-Mediated Synthesis
- •16.3.1 Synthetic Catalysis
- •16.3.2 Electrocatalysis
- •16.3.3 Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
- •16.4 Challenges, Limitation, and Future Perspective
- •16.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •Index

20 R. Srivastava
Liu J, Sun L, Xu W, Wang Q, Yu S, Sun J (2019) Current advances and future perspectives of 3D
printing natural-derived biopolymers. Carbohydr Polym 207:297–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.carbpol.2018.11.077
Ma G, Yang D, Zhou Y, Xiao M, Kennedy JF, Nie J
water-soluble N-alkylated chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 74(1):121–126
Ma M, Dai Y, Zou JL, Wang L, Pan K, Fu HG (2014) Synthesis of iron oxide/partly graphitized
carbon composites as a high-efficiency and low-cost cathode catalyst for microbial fuel cells.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(16):13438–13447
Madni A, Kousar R, Naeem N, Wahid F (2021) Recent advancements in applications of chitosan-
based biomaterials for skin tissue engineering. J Bioresour Bioprod 6(1):11–25
Maeda M, Kadota K, Kajihara M, Sano A, Fujioka K (2001) Sustained release of human growth
hormone (hGH) from collagen film and evaluation of effect on wound healing in db/db mice. J
Control Release 77(3):261–272
Maity B, Samanta S, Sarkar S, Alam S, Govindaraju T (2020) Injectable silk fibroin-based hydrogel
for sustained insulin delivery in diabetic rats. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3:3544–3552. https://doi.
org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00152
Mao J, Chen L, Cai Z, Qian S, Liu Z, Zhao B et al (2022) Advanced biomaterials for regulating
polarization of macrophages in wound healing. Adv Funct Mater 32:2111003. https://doi.org/
10.1002/adfm.202111003
Mehanny S, Abu-El Magd EE, Ibrahim M et al (2021) Extraction and characterization of
nanocellulose from three types of palm residues. J Mater Res Technol 10:526–537
Miculescu F, Maidaniuc A, Voicu SI, Takur VK, Stan GE, Ciocan LT (2017a) Progress in
hydroxyapatite– starch based sustainable biomaterials for biomedical bone substitution
applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(10):8491–8512
Miculescu F, Mocanu AC, Dascalu CA et al (2017b) Facile ˘ synthesis and characterization of
hydroxyapatite particles for high value nanocomposites and biomaterials. Vacuum 146:614–622
Müller-Herrmann S, Scheibel T (2015) Enzymatic degradation of films, particles, and nonwoven
meshes made of a recombinant spider silk protein. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 1(4):247–259
Naderi P, Zarei M, Karbasi S, Salehi H (2020) Evaluation of the effects of keratin on physical,
mechanical and biological properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) electrospun scaffold: potential
application in bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 124:109502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
eurpolymj.2020.109502
Nethaji S, Sivasamy A, Tennarasu G, Saravanan S (2010) Adsorption of Malachite Green dye onto
activated carbon derived from Borassus aethiopum fower biomass. J Hazard Mater 181(1–3):
271–280
Patel AD, Telalovic S, Bitter JH, Worrell E, Patel MK (2015) Analysis of sustainability metrics and
application to the catalytic production of higher alcohols from ethanol. Catal Today 239:56–79
Pesode P, Barve S (2021a) Surface modifcation of titanium and titanium alloy by plasma electro-
lytic oxidation process for biomedical applications: a review. Mater Today Proc 46:594–602
Pesode PA, Barve SB (2021b) Recent advances on the antibacterial coating on titanium implant by
micro-arc oxidation process. Mater Today Proc 47:5652–5662
Pesode P, Barve S (2022) Magnesium alloy for biomedical applications. In: Advanced materials for
biomechanical applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 133–158
Pugliese R, Beltrami B, Regondi S, Lunetta C (2021) Polymeric biomaterials for 3D printing in
medicine: an overview. Ann 3D Print Med 2:100011. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.stlm.2021.
100011
Punj S, Singh J, Singh K (2021) Ceramic biomaterials: properties, state of the art and future
prospective. Ceram Int 47:28059–28074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.238
Rabiee N,
Atarod M, Tavakolizadeh M, Asgari S, Rezaei M, Akhavan O et al (2022) Green metal-
organic frameworks (MOFs) for biomedical applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 335:
111670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111670
(2008) Preparation and characterization of

1 Sustainable Green Biomaterials in Drug Delivery 21
Rana D, Colombani T, Saleh B, Mohammed HS, Annabi N, Bencherif SA (2023) Engineering
injectable, biocompatible, and highly elastic bioadhesive cryogels. Mater Today Bio 19:100572.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100572
Râpă M, Gaidău C, Stefan LM et al (2020) New nanofbers ˘ based
bioactive potential for tissue engineering. Materials 13(14):3149
Rezaeeyazdi M, Colombani T, Eggermont LJ, Bencherif SA (2022) Engineering hyaluronic acid-
based cryogels for CD44-mediated breast tumor reconstruction. Mater Today Bio 13:100207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100207
Rodrigo-Navarro A, Sankaran S, Dalby MJ, del Campo A, SalmeronSanchez M (2021) Engineered
living biomaterials. Nat Rev Mater 6:1175–1190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00350-8
Rogers ZJ, Zeevi MP, Koppes R, Bencherif SA (2020) Electroconductive hydrogels for tissue
engineering: current status and future perspectives. Bioelectricity 2:279–292. https://doi.org/10.
1089/bioe.2020.0025
Sadat-Shojai M, Khorasani MT, Jamshidi A (2015) 3 – Dimensional cell-laden nano-hydroxyapa-
tite/protein hydrogels for bone regeneration applications. Mater Sci Eng C 49:835–843
Saeedi M, Vahidi O, Moghbeli M, Ahmadi S, Asadnia M, Akhavan O et al (2022) Customizing
nano-chitosan for sustainable drug delivery. J Control Release 350:175–192. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.jconrel.2022.07.038
Saini M, Singh Y, Arora P, Arora V, Jain K (2015) Implant biomaterials: a comprehensive review.
World J Clin Cases WJCC 3:52. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52
Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL (2004) Novel starch-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineer-
ing: cytotoxicity, cell culture, and protein expression. Tissue Eng 10(3–4):465–474
Samadian H, Zamiri S, Ehterami A et al (2020) Electrospun cellulose acetate/gelatin nanofbrous
wound dressing containing berberine for diabetic foot ulcer healing: in vitro and in vivo studies.
Sci Rep 10(1):8312–8312
Sayed Y, Aboulazm K, Fahmy A (2018) Evaluation of ultimate tensile strength and surface
roughness of NiTi and CuNiTi orthodontic archwires after recycling procedures. Egypt Orthod
J 54:47–57. https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2018.77146
Seidi F, Yazdi MK, Jouyandeh M, Dominic M, Naeim H, Nezhad MN et al (2021) Chitosan-based
blends for biomedical applications. Int J Biol Macromol 183:1818–1850. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.003
Servatan M, Zarrintaj P, Mahmodi G, Kim S-J, Ganjali MR, Saeb MR et al (2020) Zeolites in drug
delivery: progress, challenges and opportunities. Drug Discov Today 25:642–656. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.drudis.2020.02.005
Shadish JA, DeForest CA (2020) Site-selective protein modification: from functionalized proteins
to functional biomaterials. Matter 2:50–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2019.11.011
Shamshina JL, Zavgorodnya O, Choudhary H, Frye B, Newbury N, Rogers RD (2018) In search of
stronger/cheaper chitin nanofbers through electrospinning of chitin–cellulose composites using
an ionic liquid platform. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(11):14713–14722
Shamshina JL, Berton P, Rogers RD (2019) Advances in functional chitin materials: a review. ACS
Sustain Chem Eng 7(7):6444–6457
Shokrani H, Shokrani A, Saeb MR (2022) Methods for biomaterials printing: a short review and
perspective. Methods 206:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.07.016
Soman S, Ajitha A (2018) Life cycle assessment of metallic biomaterials. In: Fundamental
biomaterials: metals. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, pp 411–423
Sozer N, Nordlund E, Ercili-Cura D, Poutanen K (2017) Cereal side-streams as alternative protein
sources. Cereal Foods World 62:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-62-4-0132
Stie MB, Kalouta K, Vetri V, Fodera V (2022) Protein materials as sustainable non-and minimally
invasive strategies for biomedical applications. J Control Release 344:12
Takur V
purifcation: a concise review. Carbohydr Polym 146:148–165
Takur S,
hydrogel nanocomposites for water purifcation and beyond. Vacuum 146:396–408
oicu SI (2016) Recent advances in cellulose and chitosan based membranes for water
K, V
Govender PP, Mamo MA, Tamulevicius S, Takur VK (2017) Recent progress in gelatin
on protein by-products with
–25

22 R. Srivastava
Takur B, Barve S, Pesode P (2022) Magnesium-based nanocomposites for biomedical
applications. In: Advanced materials for biomechanical applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
pp 113–131
Tariq A, Arif ZU, Khalid MY et
responsive soft polymers. Adv Eng Mater
Thopegowda NB, Shenoy K, Shankarnarayana RK, Kukkila J, Vaddya SB, Gingipalli K (2013)
Recycling of materials used in dentistry with reference to its economical and environmental
aspects. Int J Health Rehabil Sci 2:140–145. https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016020160
Tipping A, Wolfe IR (2016) Options for follow-up and review of the trade-related elements of the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. International Centre for Trade and Advances in
Materials Science and Engineering 19 Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Tripuraneni S, Namburi S (2008) Evaluation of genotoxicity of recycled Ni-Cr dental casting
alloys: an in vitro study. J Appl Biomater Biomech 6:47–54
Vanapalli KR, Sharma HB, Ranjan VP et al (2021) Challenges and strategies for effective plastic
waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Total Environ 750:Article ID
141514
Wang X, Chen C, Hu W, Ding A, Xu D, Zhou X (2005) Sorption of 243Am (III) to multiwall
carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 39(8):2856–2860
Wang L, Zhang Q, Chen S et al (2014) Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform based on
biomass-derived macroporous carbon materials. Anal Chem 86(3):1414–1421
Wang Y, Katyal P, Montclare JK (2019) Protein-engineered functional materials. Adv Healthc
Mater 8:1801374. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801374
Whitaker R, Hernaez-Estrada B, Hernandez RM, Santos-Vizcaino E, Spiller KL (2021) Immuno-
modulatory biomaterials for tissue repair. Chem Rev 121:11305–11335. https://doi.org/10.
1021/acs.chemrev.0c00895
Whittall DR, Baker KV, Breitling R, Takano E (2020) Host systems for the production of
recombinant spider silk. Trends Biotechnol S0167–7799(20):30244–30244. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.tibtech.2020.09.007
Wong THT, Louie JCY (2017) Te relationship between resistant starch and glycemic control: a
review on current evidence and possible mechanisms. Starch/Staerke 69(7–8):Article ID
1600205
Wu XL, Wen T, Guo HL, Yang S, Wang X, Xu AW (2013) Biomass-derived sponge-like
carbonaceous hydrogels and aerogels for supercapacitors. ACS Nano 7(4):3589–3597
Yadav D, Garg RK, Ahlawat A, Chhabra D (2020) 3D printable biomaterials for orthopedic
implants: solution for sustainable and circular economy. Resour Policy 68:101767. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101767
Yang J, Dahlstrom C, Edlund H, Lindman B, Norgren M (2019) pH-responsive cellulose–chitosan
nanocomposite films with slow release of chitosan. Cellulose 26(6):3763–3776
Yao CH, Lee CY, Huang CH, Chen YS, Chen KY (2017) Novel bilayer wound dressing based on
electrospun gelatin/keratin nanofibrous mats for skin wound repair. Mater Sci Eng C 79:533–
540
Yazdi MK, Sajadi SM, Seidi F, Rabiee N, Fatahi Y, Rabiee M et al (2022) Clickable
polysaccharides for biomedical applications: a comprehensive review. Prog Polym Sci 133:
101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101590
Zhao G, Li J, Ren X, Chen C, Wang X (2011a) Few-layered graphene oxide nanosheets as superior
sorbents for heavy metal ion pollution management. Environ Sci Technol 45(24):10454–10462
Zhao G, Jiang L, He Y et al (2011b) Sulfonated graphene for persistent aromatic pollutant
management. Adv Mater 23(34):3959–3963
Zhao X
Zhu Y, Romain C, Williams CK (2016) Sustainable polymers from renewable resources. Nature
u X, Tze WTY, Kim J, Wang P (2013) Cellulosic carbon fibers with branching carbon
, L
nanotubes for enhanced electrochemical activities for bioprocessing applications. ACS Appl
Mater Interfaces 5(18):8853–8856
540:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21001
al (1970) Recent advances in the additive manufacturing of stimuli-

1 Sustainable Green Biomaterials in Drug Delivery 23
Zhu M, Liu Y, Jiang F, Cao J, Kundu SC, Lu S (2020) Combined silk fibroin microneedles
insulin delivery. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 6:3422–3429.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.
for
0c00273
Zuin VG, Ramin LZ (2018) Green and sustainable separation of natural products from agro-
industrial waste: challenges, potentialities, and perspectives on emerging approaches. Top
Curr Chem Collect 376:229–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90653-9_8
Dr. Ruby Srivastava, a theoretical physicist, is the principal
investigator at CSIR-CCMB, Hyderabad, India. After fifteen
years in teaching, she pursued her PhD in 2010 and started her
research career with CSIR-IICT, Hyderabad, India. She has
published several solo authored papers, solo review articles, fourteen book chapters, and edited many books. She has solo authored
two books and co-authored one book project. One of her book
chapter is selected in the Web of Science™ Core Collection
(BKCI) by the Book Citation Index. Her research interests involve
Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in Drugs and Diseases and
Reverse Vaccinology in mRNA Vaccines.

Prospects of Biodegradable Material: Sustainable and Patient-Centric Approach in the Realm of Biomedical Engineering
Dhanalekshmi Unnikrishnan Meenakshi , Alka Ahuja,
Selvasudha Nandakumar, Lekshmi Salim, Chilaka Baburao,
and Shah Alam Khan
Abstract
The creation of biodegradable materials that are both sustainable and patientfriendly has become essential in the current era of rapid industrialization and
increasing environmental awareness. In the domain of healthcare, science and
technology, collaborations have led to significant medical science advancements,
resulting in the development of numerous life-improving, life-enhancing, and
life-saving biomedical engineering innova tions. Biodegradable materials are
required for fostering environmentally friendly options and therefore biodegradable materials have a promising sustainable future. Biodegradable materials hold
great promise as environmentally friendly materials with a wide range of
applications. They are particularly advantageous in patient-centered implanted
biomedical devices because of their exceptional and distinctive qualities, which
include hydrophilicity, bioactivity, renewability, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. This chapter explores a few of the main fields, such as tissue
engineering and drug delivery systems, where biodegradable materials are having
an enormous impact. It also highlights the technological breakthroughs in biodegradable materials, which combine stimuli responsive materials with 3D and 4D
printing to create dynamic, patient-specific biodegradable materials. It also briefly
addresses the current trend and instances of biodegradable materials-based
sensors for medical therapeutic, diagnostic, and body monitoring applications.
The major technological obstacles to the clinical use of biodegradable mat erials
have also been covered. Des pite the promising prospects, the clinical utilization
2
D. U. Meenakshi (✉) · A. Ahuja · L. Salim · S. A. Khan (✉)
College of Pharmacy, National University of Science and Technology, Muscat, Oman
e-mail: dhanalekshmi@nu.edu.om; shahalam@nu.edu.om
S. Nandakumar · C. Baburao
Department of Biotechnology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India
#
The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025
R. Malviya, S. Sundram (eds.), Sustainable Green Biomaterials As Drug Delivery
Systems, Biomaterials, Bioengineering and Sustainability 1,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79062-1_2
25

26 D. U. Meenakshi et al.
of biodegradable materials faces significant challenges such as rising prices,
aging populations, and a high burden of chronic illness linked to health-related
activities. To address these challenges, healthcare must completely change to
become patient-centered, preventive, evidence based, and proactive with an
emphasis on enhancing quality of life. Overall, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the scientific advancement, challenges, and promis
directions for the develo
pment of next generations of patient-centered and sus-
ing
tainable biodegradable materials.
Keywords
Biodegradable · Drug delivery · Biomedical engineering · Patient centric ·
Sustainable
2.1 Introduction
Rapid industrialization and heightened environmental consciousness in recent years
lead to the development of tailored biodegradable/sustainable materials that prioritize patient needs, ensuring optimal therapeutic outcomes while minimizing side
effects.
Pharmaceutical
patient oriented biomedical materials (Mohd et al.
biomaterials have shown great potential to revolutionize the biomedical field by
promoting sustainability and patient centered care. Additionally, the biodegradable
materials help in patient centric approach by reducing the adverse effects with long
term implantation. Unlike biodegradable implants, permanent implants need to be
removed through surgery. This surgical protocol is not convenient to the patients,
and it also carries the risk of infection or rejection with multiple unpredictable
complications. Hence, biodegradable materials provide a convenient and comfortable experience to the patients without the need for follow up surgeries and related
complications arising out of it (Abyzova et al. 2
implants interact together with the process of tissue repair and regeneration, offering
the best possible support for the healing process and perhaps shortening recovery
periods. Biodegradable scaffolds play a major role in the field of tissue engineering
and regenerative medicine by providing a basic framework for cell adherence,
proliferation, differentiation, and regeneration, as most of their components resemble
extracellular matrix (ECM) components, as discussed elsewhere in this chapter
(Olteanu et al. 2024). Biodegradable materials offer a promising solution to reduce
our environmental impact and have a bright future ahead if the demand for sustainable biomaterials continues to rise. Their exceptional and distinguished properties,
such as hydrophilicity, renewability, bioactivity, biodegradability, and biocompatibility, make them appropriate for patient-centered implanted biomedical devices.
Some polymers, such as polyesters, polyanhydrides, and polyurethanes, are
engineered to break down drugs in a controlled manner by interacting with
industries and health workers are focusing on the advancement of
).
2023
).
023
Physiologically, biodegradable
In recent years,

2 Prospects of Biodegradable Material: Sustainable and Patient-Centric… 27
biological matters. Some encompass copolymers of poly (lactic acid), poly(ε-caprolactone), and poly (glycolic acid) (Duoyi et al.
from petroleum
and other non-renewable resources, such synthetic polymers are
2021). As their derivation is
non-biodegradable. Biodegradable materials have also seen scientific and technological advancements, permitting for the design of patient-specific, dynamic
materials through the integration of stimulus responsive materials with 3D and 4D
printing and is briefly covered in this chapter. From orthopedic implants to cardiovascular stents, the use of biodegrad
able p
olymers is revolutionizing the fi
eld
of
medical device engineering. These polymers offer a biologically compatible alternative to traditional materials such as metals and ceramics, reducing the risk of devicerelated complications and enabling better long-term outcomes for patients (Fig.
2.1).
Fig. 2.1 A patient-centric approach utilizing biodegradable polymers involves the development of
sustainable health monitoring/medical devices or drug delivery systems that prioritize patient
comfort, safety, and convenience. By incorporating biodegradable polymers, these devices can be
designed to gradually degrade within the body, reducing the need for additional procedures for
removal. This approach not only enhances patient compliance and overall experience but also aligns
with sustainable and environmentally friendly practices in healthcare

28 D. U. Meenakshi et al.
This chapter also discusses the prominent impact of biodegradable materials in the
field of tissue engineering and drug delivery systems. Researchers can tailor the
composition, degradation kinetics, and mechanical properties of these materials to
optimize performance for various therapeutic purposes. From drug delivery systems
capable of controlled release to implantable devices engineered for specific
anatomical sites, the adaptability of biodegradable mat
for personalized medicine
with large surface-area-todrug administration, like matrix stability, molecular solubility, and specific
functionalities (like optical, electrical, magnetic). Novel smart device designs in
biomedical applications like in vivo imaging, molecular targeting, bio-sensing, gene
delivery, artificial implants, and cancer therapy, offer considerable benefits for
environment, industry, and
moting
the regeneration of functional tissues and organs as mentioned before. They also
mimic the cellular environment and provide support for cell adhesion, multiplication, growth, and differentiation. After some days, these scaffolds degrade by
internalization and are replaced by the newly formed cells without the mark of any
differentiation and thus help biologically to restore the organ function effectively.
This approach holds significant promise for organ transplantation, wound healing,
and cartilage regeneration (Olteanu et al. 2024). These materials also hold the
potential to significantly change healthcare delivery and medical pract ice in the
coming years because they offer safer, more effective and eco-friendly treatment
options to the patients. Continued research and innovation in this field could unlock
the limitless potential of biodegradable materials to address unmet medical needs
and elevate patient outcomes. Sustainable biomaterials are always compatible with
tissue environment, biodegradable and allow faster resorption (Trinath et al. 2020).
biomaterials based on their compo sition, sources and applications in drug delivery
and biomedical engineering across various medical specialties, such as wound
healing and cancer treatment. The present trend and examples of biodegradable
materials-based on sensors for therapeutic, diagnostic, and body monitoring
applications is also discussed. The potential impact of sustainable biomaterials on
healthcare is immense, as they hold the promise of personalized treatments that cater
to individual patient requirements, providing hope for improved treatment effectiveness, reduced side effects, and a more promising outlook for medical care.
healt
In the field of tissue engineering, biodegradable polymers serve as scaffolds for
This chapter also briefly explains about the benefits and features of sustainable
hier
lives
and targeted interventions (Trucillo
volume ratio and small sizes can be engineered to tailor
societ
y via eco-friendly, sustainable approaches, pro-
and a cleaner world.
erials opens new avenues
2024). Nano particles
2.2 Sustainable Green Biomaterials
Due to the unique properties sustainable biomaterial are being efficiently employed
in technologies like tissue engineering and drug delivery. Tissue engineering is a
discipline which work with combination of engineering, materials, and cells to
restore, maintain, improve or replace different type of biological tissues. In short,

2 Prospects of Biodegradable Material: Sustainable and Patient-Centric… 29
tissue engineering develops biological substitutes. Scientists have investigated
renewable and organic material alternatives to embark upon this problem. In recent
years, “bio-sustainability” has gained attention in pharmaceutical, and biomedical
research. Developing “green,” sustainable materials that perform as well as a
traditional ones is being the great challenge. During novel product designing,
green biomaterial ensures stability, quality, efficac
polymer
sector’s environmental effect can aid accomplish today’s greater sustain-
y, and safety. Reducing the
able development goals. Scientists are constantly searching for better ways to create
sustainable polymers, which opens the door to green materials derived from biomass
or other natural sources.
2.2.1 Naturally Derived Polymers and Polymer Substrates
Scientists have focused on both animal and plant sources of biopolymers,
incorporating chitosan, hyaluronic acid, collagen, silk, alginates, arabic gum, and
dextrans (Liu et al.
processing methods like extraction and purification are generally required for these
materials, which can augment costs and decrease yield. Cellulose, starch, hemicellulose, keratin, lignin, and silk fibroin are few examples of renewable resource-based
bio-sustainable polymers that have demonstrated capabilities based on biodegradability, affordability, and biocompatibility. Such biopolymers are quite costeffective, and eco-friendly as they are made from biomasses that are derived from
industrial or agricultural wastes (Liu et al.
skin tissue engine ering (skin burns, wound healing etc.), bladder tissue engineering,
cardiovascular tissue engineering and scaffolding. Natural biomaterials are of two
types: polysaccharide nature (chitosan, alginate, carrageen, cellulose, pectin, agarose, and hyaluronic acid) and protein nature (collagen, gelatin, silk, keratin,
and fibrin). Due to their enhanced performance, functionality, and reproducibility
co
red to natural biomaterials, synthetic biomaterials have attracted researchers
mpa
for use in various technologies. Examples of such materials are Poly lactic acid
(PLA), Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), Poly-p-dioxanone (PDS), Poly glycolic
acid (PGA), Poly (ethylene succinate) (PES), Poly (butylene succinate) (PBS).
Utilizing supercritical fluids for polymer dissolution without using organic solvents
is a greener technology with considerabl e environmental and medicinal benefits.
Different research groups are evaluating supercritical fluid methods (SCF) to create
pharmacological carriers with nutraceutical (e.g., vitamins, CoQ10) or inorganic
compounds of growing interest (Kankala et al.
alginates, and chitosan, because they do not negatively influence biocompatibility,
and hydrophilicity, which are significant to control molecular release processes.
Diffusion processes mediated by matrix characteristics can specifically target
drugs like doxorubicin into exact tissue sites, reducing collateral effects during
chemotherapy (Martău et al. 2019). Plant-derived extracts suggest anti-inflammatory
characteristics and are a greener approach for synthesizing copper, silver, and gold
nano particles (Thiruvengadam et al.
2022a; Hong et al. 2020; Sun et al. 2020
2022a).
Biomaterials are used in areas like
These methods are ideal for
2021).
2019).
However, additional
).

30 D. U. Meenakshi et al.
2.2.1.1 Protein Based Sustainable Biomaterials
Collagen, gelatin and keratin are protein-based biomaterials used in drug delivery
and tissue engineering. Collag en molecule constitutes three polypeptide chains,
entwined like a three-stranded rope. There is a unique twist in the opposite direction
in every chain. The main factor influencing the development of a helix is the amount
of glycine and amino acid residues. The primary forces holding the strands together
are covalent bonds and hydrogen bonding between neighbouring CO and NH
molecules. The fundamental collagen molecule is a rod-like molecule with a molecular weight of around 300 kDa and dimensions of roughly 3000 and 15 A, respectively. Glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline are the three main amino acids found in
the triple helix structure. Glycine, proline, and X—any amino acid—make up the
pattern. Amino acids cause the collagen to perform certain tasks. The h elical
structure is held together by hydrogen bonds, which connect peptide bonds (Shenoy
2022). In the field of drug delivery to encourage the creation of bones, collagen
et al.
film and matrix were used as gene delivery vehicles. To track the growth of bones
and changes in carrier collagen’s absorbent state, a composite of collagen and
recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) was developed as a
patient centric approach. Whereas collagen alone did not result in any bone development, the rhBMP-2/collagen only implant caused active bone production. Collagen matrix that was loaded with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and near
osteogenic cells resulted in direct osteo induction, however cartilage formation
was not triggered and hence raised the concern towards patient benefits (Khan and
Khan 2013). In the field of tissue engineering hydrogel was made with recombinant
human collagen and carboxylated chitosan using 1 ethyl-3 (3-dimetyl) aminopropyl
carbodiimide as a crosslinking agent. Hydrogel tested on Sprague Dawley rats for
gene expression on extracellular membrane- associated proteins were measured by
qRT-PCR and for wound healing capacity as a prospect of sustainable biomaterials
in the clinical practice. This study revealed the expression of collagen 1, collagen
3 and integrin and hence the effectiveness of sustainable biomaterial. That means
developed hydrogel has good wound healing capacity with creation of environment
for adhesion, spreading, migration and proliferation of fibroblast cells (Yang et al.
2021)
ecently, technology suppliers have created a variety of customized (patient
. R
centric approach) wound dressings intended especially for the treatment of chronic
wounds, demonstrating the medicinal application of various extracted sustainable
collagens. They hope that rate of chronic wound closure will rise and clinical results
will be much improved by these customised dressings (Zhao et al. 2023).
Bioengineered silk, synthesized using recombinant systems in several organisms,
recommends a sustainable alternative to traditional silk harvesting. Functioning of
silk spidroin proteins with peptides such as DOX and H2.1 are used to design
targeted drug delivery systems. For instance, composite silk spidroin sphere s can
deliver cancer medication especially to breast cancer cells expressing the HER2
receptor (Maity et al. 2020). Turkey tendon collagen, a squander product from the
chicken industry, can be processed like sponge scaff olds that could release
medicines such as prilocaine hydrochloride. Gelatin, a derivative from collagen,
can be synthesized as drug delivery hydrogels, such as those utilized to deliver anti-
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
