Добавил:
ivanov666
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Общая теория языкознания. Учебно-методическое пособие
.pdf
[у]:
Гласный.
Лабиализованность: лабиализованный.
Ударный/безударный: ударный.
[ч’]:
Согласный.
Место образования: среднеязычный.
Способ образования: аффриката.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
Твердость/мягкость: мягкий.
1. tree
[t]:
Согласный.
Место образования: альвеолярный.
Способ образования: смычный.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
[r]:
Согласный.
Место образования: альвеолярный.
Способ образования: дрожащий.
Звонкость/глухость: звонкий.
[iː]:
Гласный.
Лабиализованность: нелабиализованный.
Ударный/безударный: ударный.
Долгота: долгий.
2. think
[θ]:
Согласный.
Место образования: межзубный.
Способ образования: щелевой.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
[ɪ]:
Гласный.
Лабиализованность: нелабиализованный.
Ударный/безударный: ударный.
Долгота: краткий.
[ŋ]:
Согласный.
Место образования: заднеязычный, велярный.
Способ образования: носовой.
Звонкость/глухость: звонкий.
[k]:
Согласный.
Место образования: заднеязычный, велярный.
Способ образования: смычный.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
– 101 –

3. song
[s]:
Согласный.
Место образования: альвеолярный.
Способ образования: щелевой.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
[ɒ]:
Гласный.
Лабиализованность: нелабиализованный.
Ударный/безударный: ударный.
Долгота: краткий.
[ŋ]:
Согласный.
Место образования: заднеязычный, велярный.
Способ образования: носовой.
Звонкость/глухость: звонкий.
4. quick
[k]:
Согласный.
Место образования: заднеязычный, велярный.
Способ образования: смычный.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
[w]:
Согласный.
Место образования: губно-губной.
Способ образования: щелевой.
Звонкость/глухость: звонкий.
[ɪ]:
Гласный.
Лабиализованность: нелабиализованный.
Ударный/безударный: ударный.
Долгота: краткий.
[k]:
Согласный.
Место образования: заднеязычный, велярный.
Способ образования: смычный.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
5. bread
[b]:
Согласный.
Место образования: губно-губной.
Способ образования: смычный.
Звонкость/глухость: звонкий.
[r]:
Согласный.
Место образования: альвеолярный.
Способ образования: дрожащий.
Звонкость/глухость: звонкий.
– 102 –

[e]:
Гласный.
Лабиализованность: нелабиализованный.
Ударный/безударный: ударный.
Долгота: краткий.
[d]:
Согласный.
Место образования: альвеолярный.
Способ образования: смычный.
Звонкость/глухость: звонкий.
6. chair
[tʃ]:
Согласный.
Место образования: постальвеолярный.
Способ образования: аффриката.
Звонкость/глухость: глухой.
[eə]:
Гласный.
Лабиализованность: нелабиализованный.
Ударный/безударный: ударный.
Долгота: долгий.
6. Запишите пословицы в фонематической транскрипции (по различным фонологическим
школам). Для английских пословиц запишите британскую и американскую транскрипцию.
1. Без труда не вытащишь и рыбку из пруда.
Московская фонологическая школа:
[bʲɪs trʊˈda nʲɪ vɨˈtaɕːɪʂ ɪ rɨpˈku ɪs prʊˈda]
Петербургская фонологическая школа:
[bʲɪs trʊˈda nʲɪ vɨˈtaɕːɪʂ ɪ rɨpˈku ɪs prʊˈda]
2. Волков бояться – в лес не ходить.
Московская фонологическая школа:
[vɐlˈkof bɐˈjatsːə – v lʲes nʲɪ xɐˈdʲitʲ]
Петербургская фонологическая школа:
[vɐlˈkof bɐˈjatsːə – v lʲes nʲɪ xɐˈdʲitʲ]
3. Семь раз отмерь, один раз отрежь.
Московская фонологическая школа:
[sʲemʲ raz ɐtˈmʲerʲ, ɐˈdʲin raz ɐˈtrʲeʂ]
Петербургская фонологическая школа:
[sʲemʲ raz ɐtˈmʲerʲ, ɐˈdʲin raz ɐˈtrʲeʂ]
4. A stitch in time saves nine.
Британская транскрипция:
/ə stɪtʃ ɪn taɪm seɪvz naɪn/
Американская транскрипция:
/ə stɪtʃ ɪn taɪm seɪvz naɪn/
– 103 –

5. Actions speak louder than words.
Британская транскрипция:
/ˈækʃənz spiːk ˈlaʊdə ðən wɜːdz/
Американская транскрипция:
/ˈækʃənz spik ˈlaʊdər ðən wɝdz/
6. Better late than never.
Британская транскрипция:
/ˈbetə leɪt ðən ˈnevə/
Американская транскрипция:
/ˈbɛtər leɪt ðən ˈnɛvər/.
Ответы на упражнения к разделу 4.2
1. Типы словообразовательных процессов.
1. GUI (Graphical User Interface) → аббревиация (инициальный тип).
2. professor → prof → сокращение (усечение).
3. information + commercial → infomercial → блендинг (словослияние).
4. drink → drank → внутренняя флексия (аблаут).
5. sandwich → эпонимизация (от имени собственного).
6. unreliable → аффиксация (комбинация префиксации и суффиксации).
7. windshield → словосложение (компаундинг).
8. orientation → orientate → обратное словообразование.
9. good → better → супплетивизм.
10. process (n) → process (v) → конверсия.
2. Анализ синтаксических зависимостей
Предложение 1: «Весенний ветер колышет молодую листву»
весенний → ветер (согласование);
ветер → колышет (предикативная связь);
колышет → листву (управление);
молодую → листву (согласование).
Предложение 2: «Студенты внимательно слушали лекцию профессора»
студенты → слушали (предикативная связь);
внимательно → слушали (примыкание);
слушали → лекцию (управление);
лекцию → профессора (управление).
Предложение 3: «В старом парке тихо падали жёлтые листья»
в → парке (управление);
старом → парке (согласование);
тихо → падали (примыкание);
падали → листья (предикативная связь);
жёлтые → листья (согласование).
3. Анализ словосочетаний
«красивая картина» – согласование (прилагательное согласуется с существительным в роде,
числе, падеже);
«читать книгу» – управление (глагол требует винительного падежа);
«говорить громко» – примыкание (наречие примыкает к глаголу);
«дом отца» – управление (существительное требует родительного падежа);
«очень интересный» – примыкание (наречие примыкает к прилагательному).
– 104 –

4. Концептуальное поле «путешествие»/«travel»
Полное совпадение значений:
journey/путешествие;
expedition/экспедиция;
tour/тур.
Частичное совпадение:
voyage/вояж (морское путешествие);
trip/поездка (короткое путешествие);
excursion/экскурсия (познавательная поездка).
Лакуны:
wanderlust (нет прямого эквивалента в русском);
турне (специфическое использование в русском);
круиз (заимствование со специфическим значением).
5. Анализ многозначности
Plain/простой
Общие значения:
несложный, обычный;
ясный, понятный.
Различия:
plain (англ.): равнина, гладкий, без украшений;
простой (рус.): незамысловатый, скромный, народный.
Bright/яркий
Общие значения:
светящийся, излучающий свет;
заметный, выделяющийся.
Различия:
bright (англ.): умный, сообразительный;
яркий (рус.): насыщенный (о цвете), выразительный.
6. Семантические поля
Distract/отвлекать
Ядерное значение:
переключение внимания.
Периферийные значения:
развлекать (англ.);
мешать (рус.);
рассеивать внимание (общее).
Hover/парить
Ядерное значение:
находиться в воздухе неподвижно.
Периферийные значения:
зависать (о компьютере) – рус.;
нависать, угрожать – англ.;
медлить с решением – англ.
Ingenuity/изобретательность
Ядерное значение:
способность создавать новое.
Периферийные значения:
находчивость (общее);
хитроумие (рус.);
оригинальность мышления (англ.).
– 105 –

ТЕКСТЫ ДЛЯ АНАЛИЗА
A COMEDY OF MASKS
Novel
by
ERNEST DOWSON and ARTHUR MOORE
In that intricate and obscure locality, which stretches between the Tower and Poplar, a tarry
region, scarcely suspected by the majority of Londoners, to whom the «Port of London» is an expression purely geographical, there is, or was not many years ago, to be found a certain dry dock
called Blackpool, but better known from time immemorial to skippers and longshoremen, and all
who go down to the sea in ships, as «Rainham's Dock».
Many years ago, in the days of the first Rainham and of wooden ships, it had been no doubt
a flourishing ship-yard; and, indeed, models of wooden leviathans of the period, which had been
turned out, not a few, in those palmy days, were still dusty ornaments of its somewhat antique
office. But as time went on, and the age of iron intervened, and the advance on the Clyde and the
Tyne had made Thames ship-building a thing of the past, Blackpool Dock had ceased to be
of commercial importance. No more ships were built there, and fewer ships put in to be overhauled and painted; while even these were for the most part of a class viewed at Lloyd's with
scant favour, which seemed, like the yard itself, to have fallen somewhat behind the day. The
original Rainham had not bequeathed his energy along with his hoards to his descendants; and,
indeed, the last of these, Philip Rainham, a man of weak health, original Rainham had not bequeathed his energy along with his hoards to his descendants; and, indeed, the last of these, Philip Rainham, a man of weak health, whose tastes, although these were veiled in obscurity, were
supposed to trench little upon shipping, let the business jog along so much after its own fashion,
that the popular view hinted at its imminent dissolution. A dignified, scarcely prosperous quiet
seemed the normal air of Blackpool Dock, so that even when it was busiest --and work still came
in, almost by tradition, with a certain steadiness--when the hammers of the riveters and the
shipwrights awoke the echoes from sunrise to sunset, with a ferocious regularity which the present proprietor could almost deplore, there was still a suggestion of mildewed antiquity about it
all that was, at least to the nostrils of the outsider, not unpleasing. And when the ships were
painted, and had departed, it resumed very easily its more regular aspect of picturesque dilapidation. For in spite of its sordid surroundings and its occasional lapses into bustle, Blackpool Dock,
as Rainham would sometimes remind himself, when its commercial motive was pressed upon him
too forcibly, was deeply permeated by the spirit of the picturesque.
Certainly Mr. Richard Lightmark, a young artist, in whose work some excellent judges were
beginning already to discern, if not the hand of the master, at least a touch remarkably happy,
was inclined to plume himself on having discovered, in his search after originality, the artistic
points of a dockyard.
It was on his first visit to Rainham, whom he had met abroad some years before, and with
whom he had contracted an alliance that promised to be permanent, that Lightmark had decided
his study should certainly be the river. Rainham had a set of rooms in the house of his foreman,
an eighteenth-century house, full of carved oak mantels and curious alcoves, a ramshackle structure within the dock-gates, with a quaint balcony staircase, like the approach to a Swiss chalet,
leading down into the yard. In London these apartments were his sole domicile; though, to his
friends, none of whom lived nearer to him than Bloomsbury, this seemed a piece of conduct too
– 106 –

flagrantly eccentric – on a parity with his explanation of it, alleging necessity of living on the spot:
an explanation somewhat droll, in the face of his constant lengthy absence, during the whole
of the winter, when he handed the reins of government to his manager, and took care of a diseased lung in a warmer climate. To Lightmark, however, dining with his friend for the first time
on chops burnt barbarously and an inferior pudding, residence even in a less salubrious quarter
than Blackpool would have been amply justified, in view of the many charming effects – for the
most part coldly sad and white – which the river offered, towards evening, from the window
of his friend's dining-room.
A DOG'S TALE
by Mark Twain
My father was a St. Bernard, my mother was a collie, but I am a Presbyterian. This is what
my mother told me, I do not know these nice distinctions myself. To me they are only fine large
words meaning nothing. My mother had a fondness for such; she liked to say them, and see other
dogs look surprised and envious, as wondering how she got so much education. But, indeed,
it was not real education; it was only show: she got the words by listening in the dining-room and
drawing-room when there was company, and by going with the children to Sunday-school and
listening there; and whenever she heard a large word she said it over to herself many times,
and so was able to keep it until there was a dogmatic gathering in the neighborhood, then she
would get it off, and surprise and distress them all, from pocket-pup to mastiff, which rewarded
her for all her trouble. If there was a stranger he was nearly sure to be suspicious, and when he
got his breath again he would ask her what it meant. And she always told him. He was never
expecting this but thought he would catch her; so when she told him, he was the one that looked
ashamed, whereas he had thought it was going to be she. The others were always waiting for this,
and glad of it and proud of her, for they knew what was going to happen, because they had had
experience. When she told the meaning of a big word they were all so taken up with admiration
that it never occurred to any dog to doubt if it was the right one; and that was natural, because,
for one thing, she answered up so promptly that it seemed like a dictionary speaking, and for
another thing, where could they find out whether it was right or not? for she was the only cultivated dog there was. By and by, when I was older, she brought home the word Unintellectual,
one time, and worked it pretty hard all the week at different gatherings, making much unhappiness and despondency; and it was at this time that I noticed that during that week she was asked
for the meaning at eight different assemblages, and flashed out a fresh definition every time,
which showed me that she had more presence of mind than culture, though I said nothing,
of course. She had one word which she always kept on hand, and ready, like a life-preserver, a
kind of emergency word to strap on when she was likely to get washed overboard in a sudden
way – that was the word Synonymous. When she happened to fetch out a long word which had
had its day weeks before and its prepared meanings gone to her dump-pile, if there was a
stranger there of course it knocked him groggy for a couple of minutes, then he would come to,
and by that time she would be away down wind on another tack, and not expecting anything;
so when he'd hail and ask her to cash in, I (the only dog on the inside of her game) could see her
canvas flicker a moment – but only just a moment – then it would belly out taut and full, and she
would say, as calm as a summer's day, «It's synonymous with supererogation,» or some godless
long reptile of a word like that, and go placidly about and skim away on the next tack, perfectly
comfortable, you know, and leave that stranger looking profane and embarrassed, and the initiated slatting the floor with their tails in unison and their faces transfigured with a holy joy.
– 107 –

And it was the same with phrases. She would drag home a whole phrase, if it had a grand
sound, and play it six nights and two matinees, and explain it a new way every time – which she
had to, for all she cared for was the phrase; she wasn't interested in what it meant, and knew
those dogs hadn't wit enough to catch her, anyway. Yes, she was a daisy! She got so she wasn't
afraid of anything, she had such confidence in the ignorance of those creatures. She even brought
anecdotes that she had heard the family and the dinner-guests laugh and shout over; and as
a rule she got the nub of one chestnut hitched onto another chestnut, where, of course, it didn't
fit and hadn't any point; and when she delivered the nub she fell over and rolled on the floor and
laughed and barked in the most insane way, while I could see that she was wondering to herself
why it didn't seem as funny as it did when she first heard it. But no harm was done; the others
rolled and barked too, privately ashamed of themselves for not seeing the point, and never suspecting that the fault was not with them and there wasn't any to see.
You can see by these things that she was of a rather vain and frivolous character; still,
she had virtues, and enough to make up, I think. She had a kind heart and gentle ways, and never
harbored resentments for injuries done her, but put them easily out of her mind and forgot them;
and she taught her children her kindly way, and from her we learned also to be brave and prompt
in time of danger, and not to run away, but face the peril that threatened friend or stranger,
and help him the best we could without stopping to think what the cost might be to us. And she
taught us not by words only, but by example, and that is the best way and the surest and the
most lasting. Why, the brave things she did, the splendid things! she was just a soldier; and so
modest about it – well, you couldn't help admiring her, and you couldn't help imitating her;
not even a King Charles spaniel could remain entirely despicable in her society. So, as you see,
there was more to her than her education.
– 108 –

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]
