Добавил:
ivanov666
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Mental processes and states in general psychology (for students in the English medium). Study aid
.pdf
101
– Role-Playing: participants act out specific roles or situations, and their
behavior is observed for insights into their coping strategies and interpersonal
dynamics.
5. Choice/Ordering Techniques
Participants are presented with options and asked to choose or order them
according to preference. Their choices are believed to reflect their values, priorities,
and attitudes.
Example:
Forer Sentence Completion Test
The Forer Sentence Completion Test is a psychological technique aimed
at exploring self-identity, self-esteem, and personal goals. This test consists of
a series of incomplete statements that the participant must complete based on their
personal experiences, beliefs, and preferences. The primary objective of the test is to
identify the individual's internal attitudes, motivations, and expectations.
The administration of the test proceeds as follows:
1. The participant is presented with a set of incomplete sentences, each
beginning with a general statement.
2. The examinee is required to independently complete each sentence by
selecting the option that best reflects their views or experiences.
3. Once all sentences have been completed, the results are analyzed by
a specialist who looks for common themes, recurring behavioral patterns, or
meanings that are important to the participant.
This test is employed to study self-awareness, personal values, and life
orientations, helping to gain a deeper understanding of the individual's inner world.
Participants rank or prioritize statements based on their relevance to their life,
providing information about their self-concept and goals.
Each category of projective tests offers unique opportunities for assessing
various aspects of personality and psychological functioning. While some tests
emphasize creativity and free expression, others focus on structured responses or
preferences. Together, these techniques contribute to a more comprehensive
understanding of human psychology, particularly when used alongside other
diagnostic tools.
PERSONALITY INVENTOTORIES
In contrast to projective tests, personality inventories employ structured
questionnaires to assess specific traits, attitudes, or dispositions. Respondents answer
102
multiple-choice or Likert-scale items, yielding quantitative data that can be compared
against normative samples. Well-known examples include the Minnesota Multiphasic
Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the NEO Personality Inventory.
Strengths of Personality Inventories
1. Standardization: scoring systems are clearly defined, ensuring consistency
and reliability across administrations.
2. Objectivity: results are less influenced by the examiner's bias, promoting
fairness and transparency.
3. Efficiency: self-reported measures can be administered quickly and scored
automatically, saving time and resources.
4. Normative Comparisons: many inventories are normed on large populations,
allowing for meaningful comparisons between individuals.
Challenges of Personality Inventories
1. Social Desirability Bias: respondents may answer in ways they believe are
socially acceptable rather than truthfully reflecting their actual feelings or behaviors.
2. Surface Level Insights: quantitative scales may miss nuanced or idiosyncratic
aspects of personality, focusing instead on broad categories.
3. Limited Depth: unlike projective tests, inventories do not probe deeply into
unconscious processes or latent conflicts.
Integration and Complementarity
While projective tests and personality inventories have different strengths and
weaknesses, they complement one another effectively. Combining these approaches
can yield a more comprehensive and balanced assessment of an individual's
psychological functioning. For instance:
– projective tests can illuminate unconscious dynamics that inform personality
traits measured by inventories;
– personality inventories provide standardized benchmarks against which
projective test findings can be contextualized.
By integrating both methods, clinicians can construct a more holistic portrait of
the client, capturing both overt characteristics and covert influences shaping their
behavior and emotional life.
The Pictogram Method as a Key to Inner Experiences
As we know, projective tests are designed to uncover hidden experiences,
motivations, and personality traits. In the context of the pictogram method,
the drawing created by the subject is seen as a reflection of their inner world.
Let’s explore several ways this method can be utilized:
103
1. Diagnosis of Emotional State: Pictograms can mirror the subject’s current
mood or emotions. Bright colors and dynamic lines might signify a positive outlook,
whereas darker shades and static imagery could indicate anxiety or depression.
2. Identification of Internal Conflicts: The content of the drawings can expose
internal contradictions or conflicts present in the subject’s mind. This becomes
particularly evident when different elements of the drawing clash or create
dissonance.
3. Exploration of Cognitive Processes: Analyzing which words were easily
forgotten versus those successfully remembered with the aid of pictograms offers
insights into how memory and attention function. This enables identification of
specific patterns in perception and information processing.
4. Evaluation of Creativity: The capacity to generate unique and unconventional
associations serves as a marker of the subject’s creative potential. Unusual or
distinctive pictograms point toward higher levels of creativity.
5. Stress Level Determination: Recurring symbols or elements in the drawings
act as indicators of stress levels. Repetitive themes frequently align with
subconscious feelings or preoccupations.
Methodology Pictogram proposed by A.R. Luria in the first half of
the 20th century to study indirect memorization. Later this method was used to study
thinking, emotions, personal characteristics, i.e. used and projective component
technologies. Mentally healthy people usually make varied but meaningful connections.
So, for example, to the expression "jolly holiday" they can draw flowers, or a glass of
juice; to the word "separation" — an envelope or a locomotive, or a hand waving
a handkerchief; to the word "development" — a growth chart or a plant, or a baby, or
an egg. All these and many other connections are equally good, since they can really
serve as a means of recalling a given word.
We can divide all associations into 5 groups:
1. Subject specific images (image of a specific object, such as a pen,
a hammer, a Christmas tree).
2. Sign-symbolic — contain signs, symbols.
3. Plot — the image of any action, people.
4. Abstract.
5. Metaphorical.
LABORATORY WORK
Work progress: you will be asked to memorize words and phrases. We will
remember in a special way: to make it easier to remember, you must use a pencil
104
and paper — for each word you need to draw something, a small drawing, which will
then help you remember the word/phrase. On the sheet you can not write numbers and
letters. The quality of the drawing is not important, the main thing is that you can
remember the given word with it. Then we will start working, there will be a lot of
words, we remember now and we will remember later.
1. Fun party.
2. Hard work.
3. Poison question.
4. Justice.
5. Parting, separation.
6. Doubt.
7. Happiness.
8. Disease.
9. Wealth.
10. Angry teacher.
Examples of pictograms are shown in Figures 9, 10, 11.
Fig. 9
105
Fig. 10
106
Fig. 11
107
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. De Bono, E. Conflicts: A Better Way to Resolve Them. — London : Harrap,
2018. — 224 p.
2. Filley, A.C. Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. — Glenview IL : Scott,
Foresman, 1975. — 180 p.
3. Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., Walach, H. Mindfulness-based
stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis // Journal of Psychosomatic
Research. — 2004. — No. 51. — P. 35–43.
4. Conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational
behaviour // Sciencedirect URL: https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/
003050737290030X (accessed: 14.03.2025).
5. Jain, S., Shapiro, S. L., Swanick, S. et al. A randomized controlled trial of
mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states
of mind, rumination, and distraction // Annals of Behavioral Medicine. — 2007. —
No. 33. — P. 11–21.
6. Jenkins, W.J. CONSCIOUSNESS A Four-Unit Lesson Plan for High School
Psychology Teachers. — Teachers of Psychology in Secondary Schools (TOPSS) of
the American Psychological Association, 2016. — 60 p.
7. Kirchoff, N., Adams, J.R. Conflict Management for Project Managers // Project
Management Institute. — URL: https://fao.org/3/w7504e/w7504e07.htm (accessed:
14.12.2024).
8. Melchenko, N.I. Clinical Psychology: A Textbook for Students of the Faculty
of Medical Psychology. — Samara : SamSMU Publishing House, 2002. — 584 p.
9. Melchenko, N.I. Projective Methods for Personality Research: A Practical
Guide. — Moscow : LLC "Bagira Printing House", 2020. — 300 p.
10. Thomas, K.W., Kilman, R.H. Conflict Mode Instrument. — Mountain
View, CA : Xicom, a subsidiary of CPP, Inc., 2007.
11. Vazire, S. PERSONALITY A Six-Day Unit Lesson Plan for High School
Psychology Teachers. — Teachers of Psychology in Secondary Schools (TOPSS) of
the American Psychological Association, 2014. — 72 p.
12. Witkiewitz, K., Marlatt, G. A., Walker, D. Mindfulness-based relapse
prevention for alcohol and substance use disorders // Journal of Cognitive
Psychotherap. — 2005. — No. 19. — P. 211–228.
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]