Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3710_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать
28
6 Mycotic Aneurysm oftheAbdominal Aorta
Fig. 6.1 Infrarenal saccular aneurysm of the aorta
Fig. 6.2 Operative specimen with aortic dissection in the
aneurysm
Fig. 6.3 Showing osteomyelitis of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th lum-
bar vertebrae

References

Fig. 6.4 Postoperative aortogram following prosthetic
graft (Dacron)
biopsy of the 3rd lumbar vertebra was negative for any microorganisms. His general condition improved, and patient became afebrile follow­ing 4 weeks on intravenous antibiotics with slight deterioration in his renal function. Patient’s back pain diminished, and he was dis­charged on May 15, 1982, after 12weeks of par­enteral antibiotics.

Discussion

29
tic wall, and characteristic finding of a saccu­lar nature of the aneurysm on imaging studies. Isolation of E. coli from the aneurysm wall and its contents and preaortic lymph nodes and isolation of same organisms from blood showed that the patient had generalized bacte­remia, but a source of the original infection could not be identified. There was no history of substance abuse or bacterial endocarditis. The cause of osteomyelitis of the spine was not obvious. The patient remained well for subsequent 5 years and was then lost to follow-up.
Infected aneurysms of abdominal aorta are
potentially life-threatening if not detected adequately. Aortic resection and extra-ana­tomic bypass were recommended by Scher et al. [2]. This patient was relatively young, without any evidence of primary source of bacteremia, and under antibiotic coverage, it was decided to resect the aneurysm and replace it with an in situ Dacron graft. At the present time, the author would have preferred rifampin-soaked prosthetic graft. In the con­temporary practice, rifampin-soaked Dacron graft, cryopreserved vein graft, or use of autogenous reconstruction with deep veins (femoral- popliteal) is the preferred method of reconstruction [24].
Recently in a nationwide study in Sweden,
Sorelius etal. demonstrated that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the preferred modality because of improved short-term sur­vival in comparison with direct open repair without associated increased incidence of seri­ous infection- related complications or inci­dence of reoperations [5].
Hsu etal. reported infected aortic aneurysms in 19 patients with salmonella species being the most common responsible microorganisms [1]. They reported excellent results with wide debridement of infected aorta, in situ replace­ment with a Dacron graft or patch repair, and pro­longed course of intravenous antibiotics.
Mycotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta are rare. Such aneurysms should be suspected in patients with high fever, non-calcified aor-
References
1. Hsu RB, Tsay YG, Wang SS, Chu SH.Surgical treat­ment for primary infected aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, and iliac arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:746–50.
2. Scher LA, Brener DJ, Goldenkranz RJ, et al. Infected aneurysm of abdominal aorta. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1975–8.
30
6 Mycotic Aneurysm oftheAbdominal Aorta
3. Muller BT, Vegeuer OR, Grabitz K, Pillny M, Thomas L, Sandmann W. Mycotic aneurysms of the thoracic and abdominal aorta and iliac arteries; experience with anatomic and extraanatomical repair in 33 cases. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(1):106–13.
4. Nypaver TJ.Primary and secondary aorto enteric s­tula. In: Hans SS, Shephard AD, Weaver MR, Bove PG, Long GW, editors. Endovascular and open vascu-
lar reconstruction: a practical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. p.257–62.
5. Sorelius K, Wanhainen A, Furebring M, Bjork M, et al. Nationwide study of the treatment of mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm compar­ing open and endovascular repair. Circulation. 2016;134(23):1822–32.
Open Abdominal Aortic andIliac Aneurysm Repair inaPatient withCirrhosis oftheLiver
7

Physical Examination

A 75-year-old male was presented with 5.5 cm infrarenal saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm,
3.0 cm diameter bilateral common iliac aneu­rysms, and 2.5cm right hypogastric aneurysm in May 2005. The aortic aneurysm measured 4.0cm in transverse diameter in 2004 by CTA abdomen and pelvis. Patient’s comorbidities include coro­nary artery disease, atrial brillation (on warfarin), and a history of deep vein thrombosis of the left lower extremity. Preoperative cardiolite testing showed ischemia in the territory of the left anterior descending artery. Coronary arteriography showed 60% mid left anterior descending artery stenosis with a negative ow wire study.

Procedure

On May 4, 2005, patient underwent open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), bilateral common iliac aneurysm, and left hypogastric aneurysm via transperitoneal midline approach. Micronodular cirrhosis of the liver and portal venous hypertension in the retroperitoneum were encountered. Left common iliac aneurysm and its bifurcation into external iliac and hypogastric artery were exposed by mobilizing the sigmoid colon along the incision in the white line of Toldt with excessive bleeding in the pelvic area sec­ondary to venous hypertension.
Aneurysm was juxtarenal. Proximal vascular
clamp was applied above the left and below the right renal artery, and interrupted horizontal mattress sutures using 4.0 CV Prolene were used, with an outer layer of running sutures for reconstruction of proximal anastomosis. Right common iliac aneurysm extended to involve the rst centimeter of the right hypogastric artery with laminated thrombus. Right hypogastric aneurysm was ligated with 3.0 CV polypropyl­ene (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), and an end-to­end anastomosis of an 18×9mm knitted Dacron graft to the divided proximal end of the right external iliac artery was performed in a continu­ous fashion. Left limb of the Dacron graft was anastomosed to the left common iliac bifurca­tion preserving left hypogastric artery ow. This anastomosis was performed in an end-to-end fashion after resecting the anterior wall of the left common iliac aneurysm. Wedge liver biopsy was performed during the aneurysm repair which showed fatty change. His postoperative course was complicated by dilutional coagulop­athy, respiratory complications, and mild ascites with elevation of alkaline phosphatase, biliru­bin, and SGPT. Patient had a satisfactory post operative course and was discharged to the reha­bilitation unit after an 18 day stay in the hospi­tal. There was gradual improvement in the level of liver enzymes. Patient died in 2011 following low anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_7
31
32
7 Open Abdominal Aortic andIliac Aneurysm Repair inaPatient withCirrhosis oftheLiver

Discussion

Marrocco-Trischetta et al. reported 25 patients who underwent open AAA repair in the presence of biopsy-proven cirrhosis of liver and did not observe any difference in perioperative compli­cations between cirrhotic patients and controls [1]. However, there were higher intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and increased length of stay in patients with cirrhosis. From their study they concluded that in compensated cir­rhosis, open AAA repair can be performed safely. However, the reduced life expectancy in cirrhotic patients with MELD score > 10 sug­gests that the repair should not be offered in that subgroup of patients. Recently, Chu et al. reported promising short-term results after EVAR and TEVAR in patients with liver cirrho­sis who otherwise have a poor long-term out­come [2]. The author has performed seven open
AAA repairs in patients with cirrhosis including two patients presenting with ruptured AAA.Both patients with ruptured AAA in the presence of associated cirrhosis died in perioperative period. Patients undergoing open repair without rupture had increased intraoperative bleeding, transient liver dysfunction by liver function tests, and increased length of stay, but all survived open repair.

References

1. Marrocco-Trischetta MM, Kahlberg A, Astore D, Tshiombo G, Mascia D, Chiesa R. Outcome in cir­rhotic patients after elective surgical repair of infrare­nal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:906–11.
2. Chu A, Chen C, Lyn Y, Lin M, Wu VC, Ting P, Chen S.A population– based analysis of endovascular stent graft therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:1395–404.
Major Venous Injury During Repair ofAbdominal Aortic andIliac Aneurysm
8
History andProcedure
A 62-year-old male was scheduled to undergo open repair of 6.0 cm (transverse diameter) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), 4.0cm trans­verse diameter right common iliac artery aneu­rysm, and a 3.0cm left common iliac aneurysm (Fig. 8.1) on September 3, 2009. Patient’s past medical history included stable coronary artery disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Open repair was performed via midline transperitoneal approach. Proximal aortic clamp was applied to the aorta below the level of renal arteries and to external and hypogastric arteries on both sides. An 18×9mm knitted Dacron graft was anasto­mosed to the aortic neck. During the mobilization of the right common iliac aneurysm, its wall was found to be adherent to the right common iliac vein. There was an inadvertent injury to the right common iliac vein. With local pressure proxi­mally and distally from the site of the tear in the iliac vein, the anterior wall of the vein was sutured with running 5.0 cardiovascular polypro­pylene suture (Ethicon Somerville, NJ), and an end-to-end anastomosis of the 9mm limb of the Dacron graft to the divided common iliac artery was performed just above its bifurcation. As the right femoral pulse was not satisfactory, the graft was extended to the right common femoral artery by suturing the divided limb end to end just above the iliac anastomosis and end to side to common femoral artery. On the left side, the left limb of
the graft was anastomosed to the common iliac artery after resection of the aneurysm just above the bifurcation. During sudden and signicant bleeding from right common iliac vein, two units of packed RBC were transfused.
On September 6 patient developed swelling of
the right leg and was found to have thrombosis of right common femoral and proximal supercial femoral vein. Patient was anticoagulated with intravenous heparin and received Coumadin ther­apy for 6 months with gradual improvement in the swelling of the right lower extremity. Patient was last seen in September of 2018in satisfac­tory condition with postoperative CTA of the abdomen and pelvis showing no abnormalities (Fig.8.1).

Discussion

Major venous injury, though uncommon, nega­tively impacts patient’s outcome following aortic reconstruction. Iliac vein injury is the most com­mon of all major venous injuries and occurs more frequently with repair of ruptured AAA.Other contributing factors for such injury include inammatory aortic aneurysm, presence of peri­arterial inammation, and large iliac aneurysms [1]. Following iliac vein injury, there is increased incidence of deep venous thrombosis, and patients should undergo duplex venous evalua­tion of the lower extremity. If there are no
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_8
33
34
Fig. 8.1 Showing abdominal aortic aneurysm and large bilateral common iliac aneurysm with adherent right common
iliac vein
8 Major Venous Injury During Repair ofAbdominal Aortic andIliac Aneurysm
contradictions, patient should be anticoagulated for 6 months. Eighteen major venous injuries (1.9%) are discovered during open aortic recon­struction consisting of inferior vena cava (<4), iliac vein (<10), and left renal vein (<4). Of the 18 major venous injuries (dened by sudden blood loss of approximate 500 cc), 7 occurred during open AAA repair for rupture, and 9 occurred during repair of intact AAA (p 0.001) [1]. Author has encountered deep venous throm­bosis of lower extremities without iliac vein
injury following open repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with fatal pulmonary embolism in 1988 secondary to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Reference

1. Hans SS, Vang S, Sachwani-Daswani G. Iatrogenic major venous injury is associated with increased morbidity of aortic reconstruction. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;47:200–4.

Secondary Aortoduodenal Fistula Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

9
History andPhysical Examination
A 74-year-old male presented to his primary care physician with a 3-month history of weight loss, anorexia, and back pain. His past medical history was signicant for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, kidney stones, and post-thrombotic syndrome involving both lower extremities. Past surgical history included staged bilateral carotid endarter­ectomy and open repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with reconstruction using an 18 mm knitted tube graft in 2014. Ligation of the left renal vein close to the inferior vena cava was performed in order to facilitate proximal control of the aorta. Postoperative nuclear renal scan showed normal renal function on the left. Patient was followed for three and half years and was asymptomatic. Patient under­went extraction of a tooth, secondary to an abscess on October 2017. On examination (January of 2018), he was found to have poor dental hygiene and non-pitting edema of the lower extremities with brawny pigmentation. Patient was afebrile with a heart rate of 108 beats per minute, and leukocyte count was 11,600/cm (normal 4000–11,000/cm), with 84% polymor­phic neutrophils (normal <75%). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 57 mm/hg (normal 0–10 mm/hg), and C-reactive protein was
15.9 mg/dl (normal <0.6 mg/dl). Computed tomographic angiography of abdomen and pelvis showed postsurgical changes of the abdominal
aorta with the presence of mural uid and a small amount of gas at the site of proximal anastomo­sis. There was a saccular outpouching of the abdominal aorta containing gas at the proximal anastomotic sites inseparable from the duodenum with associated fat stranding (Fig. 9.1). An indium-111-labeled WBC scan (Fig. 9.2) revealed abnormal uptake at the midline sugges­tive of an aortic graft infection, with an increased uptake inferiorly consistent with a developing abscess. Patient developed bright red rectal bleeding and was emergently taken to operative room.

Procedure

Proximal aortic control was obtained using a bal­loon catheter (Z-MED, Braun) near the celiac axis. Laparotomy revealed an infra-mesenteric mass near the third and fourth portion of the duo­denum that was adherent to the proximal anasto­mosis of the aortic graft. There was a small perforation in the duodenum which was adherent to the proximal anastomosis of the unincorpo­rated Dacron graft.
Cultures of the purulent material around the
graft was positive for Streptococcus constella- tus. The opening in the duodenum was closed in two layers. The proximal aortic stump was closed with 3.0cm cardiovascular polypropyl­ene suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ).
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_9
35
36
Fig. 9.1 CTA showing perigraft uid around the graft
and air near the proximal anastomosis
Fig. 9.2 Showing positive uptake of indium (nuclear
scan) in the midline suggestive of developing abscess
9 Secondary Aortoduodenal Fistula Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Axillobifemoral graft using 8 mm GORE® INTERING® PTFE (W.L. Gore Newark, DE) was performed. However, patient died in the postoperative period from multisystem organ failure. It is possible that Streptococcus con- stellatus became seeded into the Dacron graft following extraction of the tooth abscess, but this secondary infection could not be conrmed.

Discussion

Secondary aortoenteric stula is one of the most dreaded complications of AAA repair and occurs in 0.5–1.2% of all aortic reconstruc­tions. One of the important considerations in its management includes hemodynamic status of the patient and location of the distal anastomo­sis (distal aorta, iliac or femoral arteries). Status of aortic neck as determined by CTA will deter­mine if there is an adequate aortic neck for reconstruction of proximal anastomosis. Patients with aortoenteric stula usually pres­ent 2–3years following infrarenal AAA repair with GI bleeding, which may manifest initially as a melena (herald bleed). Initial massive bleeding is uncommon. Patient may present with sepsis in up to 50% of patients. The com­munication between the gastrointestinal tract and the prosthetic graft can involve the anasto­mosis (true aortoenteric stula) or the graft body or the limb (prosthetic-enteric erosion). In aortoenteric stula the bleeding is from the aorta, while in the prosthetic-enteric erosion, bleeding is from the edge of the bowel wall. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with attention to the distal portion of the duodenum is necessary, though it is extremely uncommon to visualize the graft material with duodenoscopy.
CTA imaging demonstrates perigraft uid
thickening of the bowel wall with inammation and fat stranding. Air in the periprosthetic area and pseudoaneurysm formation may also be present [1]. In a hemodynamically stable patient, after conrmation of diagnosis or with a strong
Discussion
37
suspicion of the diagnosis, surgeon may choose two different management options: (A) staged or bilateral axillofemoral graft followed by infected aortic graft excision and (B) excision of the aortic graft with in-line aortic graft recon­struction with following conduits: (1) femoral vein, (2) cryopreserved arterial allograft, and (3) rifampin-soaked Dacron graft. Prior to in-line replacement, debridement of inamed tissue around the graft along with coverage of the proximal anastomosis and the omental pedicel ap is necessary.
The patient should be on broad spectrum of antibiotics suitable for polymicrobial nature of infection. Through a midline incision, supra­celiac exposure of the aorta is obtained, and proximal control is obtained after systemic heparinization and mannitol infusion is started. Distal control is obtained at the iliac or femoral artery level. In relatively more sta­ble patients, a new in-line rifampin-soaked graft should be prepared before exposing the site of aortoenteric communication. If bleed­ing is encountered in the site of fistula, proxi­mal or distal clamps are applied immediately [2, 3]. As the infrarenal segment of the aorta is exposed, the proximal clamp is moved from the supraceliac to the infrarenal location to reduce the visceral and renal ischemic time [2,
3]. Depending on inflammatory changes in the
aorta below the renal artery, suprarenal clamp­ing may be more appropriate. Proximal perire­nal aorta is debrided and proximal anastomosis is performed. The opening in the bowel wall is isolated with saline-soaked sponges. Vascular clamp is moved distal to the proximal anasto­mosis to check for hemostasis. Debridement of the remaining periaortic tissues is com­pleted. Complete excision of the infected graft is performed. Distal anastomosis is performed to the iliac arteries beyond the previously per­formed distal anastomosis. The duodenal defect is debrided and closed by sutures in two layers [2, 3].
If the infected graft extends distal to the femo­ral arteries, groin incision performed rst with
exposure of the graft and origins of the super­cial artery, the new tunnels in the retroperitoneum are ideal but in practice may be difcult to accomplish without risking injury to the iliac veins and the ureters. Sartorius muscle rotation aps are created after transecting a muscle at its origin from the anterior superior iliac spine. This promotes coverage of the new graft and groin anastomosis. Wound vac is applied for both groin incisions [2, 3].
In high-risk patients, bilateral axillofemoral bypass followed by graft excision is safer. This approach reduces extent of abdominal portion of operation and decreases ischemia-reperfusion injury associated with prolonged pelvic and lower extremity clamp time [2]. After the perfor­mance of bilateral axillofemoral bypass grafts, the patient undergoes staged excision of the infected graft, repair of the defect in the duode­num, and closure of the aortic stump up to 3days later the aortic stump is closed in two layers with three uninterrupted polypropylene sutures with a horizontal mattress sutures followed by second layer of continuous sutures. In most patients, dis­tal anastomosis of the axillofemoral graft is per­formed to the proximal supercial femoral arteries. Endovascular repair is also an option as a bridge to the denite repair in extremely high­risk patients.
Hemodynamically unstable patients can be taken immediately from the ER to the hybrid operating room. Percutaneous access under ultrasound guidance is performed followed by placement of large sheath in the femoral artery. Proximal aortic balloon occlusion catheter is then advanced to obtain proximal control. If endovascular repair is feasible, this should be considered as a bridge to denitive repair. If not, a midline incision is made and a proximal supra­celiac control is obtained. If there is a limited contamination, rifampin-soaked Dacron graft reconstruction can be performed after debride­ment. If the patient’s condition is poor, ligation of the aorta, removal of the graft, and debride­ment followed by extra-anatomic graft are more suitable.