Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3710_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать

References

Fig. 75.3 Intraoperative aortogram showing large hypogastric aneurysm
hypogastric artery is often necessary in order to repair hypogastric artery aneurysm. Endovascular repair is often preferable by coil embolization of the anterior and posterior branches of the hypo­gastric artery and endograft coverage at the ori­gin of hypogastric artery [1]. Endografting of the hypogastric artery aneurysm is usually not feasi­ble because of difculty in having satisfactory landing zone for the endograft proximally and distally [2].
The risk of rupture of hypogastric artery aneu­rysm is high and estimated to be 38% and carries 50–60% mortality. Therefore, hypogastric arter­ies greater than 3 cm in diameter should be repaired although a recent study has shown that hypogastric artery aneurysm should be repaired only when they reach 4cm in transverse diame­ter. Repair of a hypogastric artery aneurysm is dependent on (1) the presence of compressive symptoms (lumbosacral nerve roots), ureter,
Fig. 75.4 Satisfactory exclusion of AAA and right hypo-
gastric aneurysm and no cross-lling of right hypogastric aneurysm from the left hypogastric artery
bladder, iliac veins, and rectum, (2) patient’s medical comorbidities, and (3) status of contra­lateral hypogastric artery.
333
which showed stable aneurysm sac measuring
4.5×4.6cm without endoleak.

Discussion

Preservation of hypogastric artery is often impos­sible in patients with hypogastric artery aneu­rysms. Open repair is difcult because of its deep location. Ligation of the feeding branches of the
References
1. Sevak S, Long G.Endovascular repair of iliac artery
aneurysm. In: Hans SS, Shephard AD, Weaver MR,
Bove PG, Long GW, editors. Endovascular and open
vascular reconstruction: a practical approach. Boca
Raton: CRC Press; 2018. p.55–61.
2. Parry DJ, Kessel D, Scott DJ. Simplifying the inter-
nal iliac artery aneurysm. Ann R Coll Surg Engl.
2001;83(5):302–8.
Part XX
Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair forSymptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Followed by Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Complicated by Type IB Endoleak
76

Physical Examination

A 77-year-old female was admitted to the hos­pital with anemia and was evaluated for occult malignancy and underwent contrast CT scan of the abdomen on July 30, 2010, which showed saccular outpouching of lower thoracic aorta with maximal diameter of aorta above the aortic hiatus (4.5cm in transverse diameter). In addi­tion, patient had infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) which measured 5.5cm in AP and 5.3cm in transverse dimension. The other positive nding was dilatation of the extrahe­patic common duct to 1.4cm in a patient with history of cholecystectomy. The dilatation of the bile duct extended to the head of the pancreas.
Patient was admitted to the hospital on May 13, 2012, from emergency room with abdominal pain and underwent CTA of the chest and abdo­men which showed aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta measuring 4.9 cm in its trans­verse diameter at the root, arch of aorta measur­ing 3.3cm, and distal descending thoracic aorta measuring 6×5cm and about 8cm in length. At the aortic hiatus, aorta measured 3.2 cm in ap diameter and 3.5cm in its transverse diameter. At the level of renal arteries, abdominal aorta mea­sured 2.4cm in its ap dimension and 2.5cm in its transverse dimension. The infrarenal AAA mea­sured 7 cm in its AP diameter and 6cm in the transverse diameter.

Procedure

Patient underwent urgent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) on May 13, 2012, for a large symp­tomatic AAA with Endurant® graft (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland). Main body 32×16×166, con­tralateral limb 16 × 20 × 93, and left iliac limb extension 20×20×82mm. The contralateral gate was captured using multiple purpose catheter. Completion aortogram showed satisfactory exclu­sion of the AAA with a delayed Type II endoleak from one of the lumbar arteries (Fig.76.1). Patient underwent follow-up of the CTA abdomen and pelvis on July 19, 2011, which showed the aneu­rysm sac measurement decreased to 5.0×5.3cm. Patient underwent CTA abdomen and pelvis on March 9, 2016, as her symptoms on admission were abdominal pain, weight loss, and constipa­tion. CTA of the chest showed enlarging saccular descending thoracic aortic aneurysm which mea­sured 7.6×6.2cm in its AP and transverse dimen­sion and 8cm in craniocaudal dimension with a large amount of thrombus.
Patient underwent thoracic endovascular aneu-
rysm repair (TEVAR) on April 12, 2016, with
®
Valiant the right side, 5F sheath was introduced percuta­neously and on the left side pre-close technique was performed. Following deployment of the tho­racic aortic stent graft angioplasty was performed. Patient underwent follow-up ultrasound of the abdomen (June 2015) which showed aneurysm
graft (Medtronic) 38×30×150cm. On
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_76
337
76 Endovascular Aneurysm Repair forSymptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Followed by Thoracic…
338
sac measurements of 4.6 × 4.6 cm without evi­dence of endoleak.
Patient was admitted with generalized weak­ness, shortness of breath, and left side abdominal pain and underwent CTA of the chest on November 23, 2017, which showed large IB endoleak from TEVAR and a small stable IA endoleak post EVAR (Fig.76.2). The excluded aneurysm sac and tho­racic aorta measured 6.2×6.4cm and the abdomi­nal aorta measured 5.4 × 5.2 cm. On April 11, 2018, patient underwent placement of a 38×38×20cm valiant endograft for treatment of Type IB endoleak with good proximal overlap, and distal extent of the thoracic endograft was 2cm proximal to the origin of celiac artery. Pre­close technique was used for deployment of the endograft from the right femoral artery. Patient underwent CTA of the abdomen in June 29, 2019, which showed satisfactory exclusion of the tho-
Fig. 76.1 CTA of the abdomen and pelvis showing satis-
factory exclusion of AAA
racic endograft with aneurysm sac measuring
8.5cm in its largest transverse diameter (Fig.76.3).
Fig. 76.2 CTA chest Type IB endoleak following TEVAR and small Type IA endoleak following EVAR
Fig. 76.3 CTA chest. TEVAR with resolution of Type IB endoleak. Scatter effect for coils for Type IA endoleak fol-
lowing EVAR

References

339
Abdominal aortic aneurysm measured 5.5×5.1cm with increasing size of type IA endoleak. As fur­ther management options for type IA endoleak were limited and patient’s medical condition was poor, she underwent coil embolization of type IA endoleak using translumbar approach.
Patient underwent follow-up CTA of the abdo­men 2weeks later following coil embolization of Type IA endoleak; however the visualization was poor due to scatter effect from the coil. It did show persistence of Type IA endoleak which was smaller in size. Patient made herself under hospice care and she died in October 2019. She died 7 years and 4 months following repair of large symptomatic AAA and in the follow-up period underwent TEVAR and repair of Type IB endoleak.

Discussion

This case illustrates that careful follow-up is essential following EVAR as well as TEVAR.Late development of Type I endoleak and increasing size of thoracic aortic aneurysm in a patient who had extensive aneurysmal disease extending from root of ascending aorta to distal abdominal aorta is not unexpected. Belvroy etal. reviewed 16 arti­cles on type IB endoleak after TEVAR [1]. They reported incidence of type IB endoleak was 15% with a mean follow-up of at least 1year. A tortu­ous aorta was a predictive factor (aortic tortuosity index>0.15cm−1). Most patients required treat­ment (22 of 27) and is usually performed with distal extension of the stent graft. Joo etal. per­formed TEVAR in 538 patients between 1994 and 2007 with 34 patients required late conversion to
open repair; 14 patients required circulatory arrest for aortic arch involvement. The mean interval to open conversion after TEVAR was 33.9 months [2]. Indications for late open conversion included Type I endoleak (14), new intimal tear induced by stent graft (6), retrograde type A dissection (4), stent migration and fracture (3), stent graft infec­tion (3), sac enlargement without endoleak (1), aortopulmonary stula (1), and stent implantation failure (1). They reported in- hospital mortality of
9.1%; therefore lifelong surveillance is manda­tory in patients who undergo TEVAR.
Fairman et al. evaluated 7006 patients from
the national dataset of TEVAR in VQI (2010–
2017) comprising 51.2% with thoracic aortic aneurysm, 33.5% type B dissection, 7% pene­trating aortic ulcer, 6.7% trauma, and 1.6% intra­mural hematoma. Reintervention rate for endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair was 6.7%. The most common cause of reinter­vention across all aortic disease was Type I endoleak [3]. The most common long-term inter­vention was placement of endovascular stent graft (65%) [3].
References
1. Belvroy VM, DeBeaufort HWL, VanHerwaarden JA, Trimarchi S.Type 1B endoleak after thoracic endo­vascular aortic repair are inadequately reported: a sys­temic review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:474–83.
2. Joo HC, Kwon JH, Kim JH, Lee S. Late open conver­sion after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:439–48.
3. Fairman AS, Beck AW, Malas MB, Goodney PP. Reintervention in the modern era of thoracic endovas­cular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(2):408–22.
Thoracic Endovascular Repair forRuptured Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery Aneurysm Without Subclavian Artery Revascularization
77
Physical Examination andHistory
An 83-year-old male presented to emergency room of an outside hospital with shortness of breath and chest discomfort. Patient had sus­tained a fall 2days prior to coming to the emer­gency room at that hospital in October 2018. A CT scan of the chest showed probable rupture of aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm with associated hemothorax. Patient was recom­mended CTA of the chest at the outside hospital, but he left the hospital against medical advice. As his shortness of breath worsened, he came to our hospital. Medical comorbidities included atrial brillation (on apixaban), and remote stroke with right-sided weakness (ambulating with the help of cane). Past surgical history included permanent pacemaker and transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Patient was rst diagnosed with aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm measuring 2.8 cm in its largest ap/ transverse diameter in January 2008 (Fig.77.1). In November 2016, CTA of the chest showed 4 cm aberrant subclavian artery aneurysm (Fig. 77.2). At that time, repair was recom­mended but patient refused any intervention. CTA of the chest at this admission (October
2018) showed large aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm with contrast extravasation and right-sided hemothorax (Fig.77.3).

Procedure

Patient underwent thoracic endovascular aneu­rysm repair (TEVAR) via right femoral artery cutdown and a percutaneous insertion of a 7 left femoral sheath. Valiant™ (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) endograft (44 mm × 44 mm × 15 cm long) was deployed proximal to the origin of aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm fol­lowed by balloon angioplasty. Completion aorto­gram showed diminished lling of the aneurysm sac (Fig.77.4). The patient underwent right sub­clavian artery coil embolization (AZUR® coils, Terumo, Somerset, NJ) via percutaneous right brachial artery approach (Fig.77.5) after deploy­ment of thoracic endograft right tube thoracos­tomy (28 F) in the sixth intercostal space with drainage of two liters of serosanguinous uid. Patient continued to improve, and chest tube was removed on the third postoperative day.
Patient complained of some pain in the distal
portion of the digits and paresthesia. Doppler arterial study showed wrist brachial index of
0.38 on the right (normal, 1.0 on the left). Patient
continued to improve, and the wrist brachial index after 3months increased to 0.53. Patient was started on fondaparinux which was transi­tioned to apixaban. CTA of the chest on postop­erative day 16th showed satisfactory exclusion of the origin of the aberrant right subclavian
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_77
341
342
Fig. 77.1 CTA of the chest showing small aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm (2008)
77 Thoracic Endovascular Repair forRuptured Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery Aneurysm Without…
Fig. 77.2 CTA of the chest showing 4cm aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm (2016)
Fig. 77.3 CTA of the chest showing ruptured large right aberrant subclavian aneurysm with hemothorax (2018)

Discussion

Fig. 77.4 TEVAR stent graft placed with coverage of the aberrant right subclavian artery, right-sided chest tube placed
with 2L bloody output
343
Fig. 77.5 Right brachial access with coil embolization of the subclavian artery just distal to the aneurysmal sac but
proximal to the internal mammary artery
artery aneurysm (Fig. 77.6). Patient was last
Discussion
seen in November 2019 with a wrist brachial index of 0.67 with no ischemic symptoms involv­ing the right upper extremity or the hand. Immediately after placement of thoracic endo­graft, patient developed thrombocytopenia (hep­arin induced).
First described in 1735 by Hunauld, the origin of right subclavian artery, arising from the descend­ing thoracic aorta is one of the most common congenital anomalies of the aortic arch and occurs in 0.5–1% of the population. Symptoms
344
Fig. 77.6 Postoperative CTA of the chest showing complete exclusion of right aberrant subclavian artery aneurysm
77 Thoracic Endovascular Repair forRuptured Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery Aneurysm Without…
of aberrant subclavian artery are mostly related to development of aneurysmal disease which occurs at its origin. The aneurysm occurs in nearly 60% of cases of right subclavian artery and is known as Kommerell’s diverticulum. Verzini et al. reported the results from a multicenter registry (2006–2013) from 7 centers in Italy reporting on 21 aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysms [1]. In their series, the main diameter of aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm was 4.2 cm. Majority of the patients had hybrid intervention (15), with single (n2) or bilateral (n12) subcla­vian to carotid artery transposition or bypass. Ascending aorta to subclavian artery bypass was performed in one patient. Perioperative death occurred in two patients. Late death occurred in one patient due to aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm-esophageal stula [1]. Wooster et al. reported hybrid repair in ten patients undergoing management of aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm [2]. All ten patients required revascu­larization or exclusion of bilateral subclavian arteries, to enable more than 20 mm proximal aortic xation zone distal to the common carotid artery for the endograft [2].
Invited Commentary fromHimanshu J.Patel, MD
(TEVAR). Our center described a shifting para­digm from open to endovascular repair over the course of two decades of experience [3]. While elective cases can be addressed with a systematic approach to subclavian artery revascularization, those presenting with rupture present with a more difcult dilemma. In our experience, the conguration of the aortic arch in patients with KD is often “Gothic” and the relative location of the site of rupture at the origin of KD often requires bilateral subclavian artery coverage to achieve adequate proximal landing zone and pre­vent the “bird-beaking” phenomenon seen in the tight Gothic arch.
There are several options potentially available
to address this dilemma. The rst option of sim­ply covering the necessary branches has potential for increased risks of stroke and in the instance of extended descending aorta coverage, spinal cord ischemia. The second option in the current era could involve a snorkel or periscope option for at least one of the arch vessels, but this has the potential to promote endoleaks and the ongoing risk for mortality from subsequent rupture. In my opinion, the best option is yet to come, namely, the use of branched endovascular aortic repair in this setting. Until stent graft technology evolves to allow for this option, we will continue to be at the mercy of the underlying anatomy.
The Ruptured Kommerell’s Diverticulum
The treatment of a Kommerell’s diverticulum (KD) has shifted considerably since the intro­duction of thoracic endovascular aortic repair

References

1. Verzini F, Isernia G, Simonte G, DeRango P, et al. Results of aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:343–50.
References
345
2. Wooster M, Back M, Sutzko D, Gaeto H, etal. A ten­year experience using a hybrid endovascular approach to treat aberrant subclavian artery aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;46:60–4.
3. Van Bogerijen GH, Patel HJ, Eliason JL, et al. Evolution in the management of aberrant subclavian arteries and the related Kommerell Diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:47–53.