Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3710_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •List of Invited Discussants
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •Reference
- •9: Secondary Aortoduodenal Fistula Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •12: Large Symptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •History
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •History
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •History
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •Reference
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •Reference
- •34: Infected Dacron Patch Following Carotid Endarterectomy
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •38: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Following Carotid Endarterectomy
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •40: Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus Following Carotid Endarterectomy
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •45: Redo Aorto-bifemoral Graft
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •48: Infected Aorto-bifemoral Graft
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •50: Aorto-Bifemoral Grafting for Infrarenal Aortic Occlusion
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •Reference
- •51: Exposed Femoral Graft Following Multiple Arterial Reconstruction
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Patient A: Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •58: Repeat Femoral Posterior Tibial Bypass Using Spliced Cephalic Vein
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •Reference
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •The Ruptured Kommerell’s Diverticulum
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •History
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •90: Iliac Stenting Complicated by Iliac Artery Rupture
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •96: Superior Mesenteric Artery In-stent Restenosis
- •Physical Examination
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •Reference
- •Procedure
- •Discussion
- •References
- •101: 100 Multiple Choice Questions
- •Part X Carotid Endarterectomy
- •Part XI Aortofemoral Grafting
- •Part XII Aortomesenteric Bypass
- •Part XIII Infrainguinal Arterial Bypass Graft
- •Part XX Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
- •Part XXIII Carotid Stenting
- •Part XXIV Iliac Stenting
- •Part XXV Aortoiliac Stenting
- •Part XXVIII Renal Artery Stenting
- •Part XXIX Subclavian Artery Stenting
- •Part XXX Acquired Arteriovenous Fistula
- •Index

65 Exposed Graft intheGroin Following Crossover Femoral-Femoral Graft andAorto-Uniiliac Stent Graft
288
Fig. 65.1 Aortogram showing large AAA and left common iliac artery aneurysm and left hypogastric artery Amplatzer
occluder plug placement
Discussion
Dortch etal. reported 35 patients from 2002 to
2012 who underwent EVAR with commercially
Hinchcliffe et al. reported 231 patients (1994–
2002) who underwent aorto-uniiliac stent graft
and crossover femoral-femoral graft [1]. They
observed local wound complications in 11% of
patients. In their series, 5-year patency of the femoral-femoral bypass graft was 83%. They concluded that when graft occlusion occurs, it is due
to inadequate inow stenosis from the stent graft
or damage to the intima of the external iliac artery.
manufactured aorto-uniiliac devices with femoralfemoral bypass graft with a median follow- up of
40 months [2]. They reported secondary procedures in 26% patients and tertiary procedures in
three patients. The authors concluded that in highrisk patients, aorto-uniiliac graft is a potential
alternative to open repair as was the case in this
report. Hossain etal. studied contralateral hypogastric artery perfusion following aorto-uniiliac

Discussion
289
Fig. 65.2 CTA abdomen and pelvis showing Type III endoleak

65 Exposed Graft intheGroin Following Crossover Femoral-Femoral Graft andAorto-Uniiliac Stent Graft
290
device and crossover femoral- femoral grafting in
130 consecutive patients [3]. With postoperative
CTA imaging, they observed 33% incidence of
occlusion of contralateral hypogastric artery and
24% incidence of stenosis of contralateral hypogastric artery with patients reporting buttock claudication in patients when hypogastric artery
occluded at follow-up.
References
1. Hinchcliffe RJ, Alrick P, Wenham PW, Hopkinson
BR. Durability of femoral-femoral bypass grafting
after aorto-uni-iliac endovascular aneurysm repair. J
Vasc Surg. 2013;38:498–503.
2. Dortch JD, Oldenberg WA, Farres H, Rawal B, etal.
Stent grafts for the endovascular repair of abdominal
Fig. 65.3 CTA showing patent aorto-uniiliac graft and a
patent crossover femoral graft to mid supercial femoral
artery using anterolateral tunnel conguration
aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(5):1258–65.
3. Hossain S, Steinmetz OK, Corrivean MM, Mackenzie
KS. Patency of contralateral internal iliac artery in
aorto-uni-iliac grafting. J Vasc Surg. 2016;60:974–82.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
forAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm,
Bilateral Common Iliac Artery
Aneurysm, andLeft Hypogastric
Aneurysm withRight Iliac Branch
EXCLUDER® Device
66
History andPhysical Examination
An 81-year-old male with history of signicant
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (secondary to nicotine abuse), chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and hypertension had a known abdominal
aortic aneurysm (AAA) which was followed by
ultrasound of the abdomen and pelvis for six
months. On June 10, 2009, patient underwent
CTA of the abdomen and pelvis which showed
7.4 × 7.2 cm infrarenal AAA with >60° aortic
neck angulation. Right common iliac artery aneurysm measured 4×3.9cm, and left common iliac
aneurysm measured 4.8×4.3cm, with a fusiform
dilatation of the left hypogastric artery
3.1×3.3cm (Fig.66.1). In addition, enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes as well as lymph nodes
in the mesentery probably related to chronic lymphocytic leukemia were seen.
Procedure
On June 20, 2019, patient underwent successful
coil embolization of the left hypogastric artery
aneurysm via a left femoral artery approach. A
5F Cobra (C2) catheter was used to engage the
left hypogastric artery. Microcatheter access to
superior gluteal artery was obtained, and coil
embolization was performed. The same microcatheter was used to engage the anterior branches
of the left hypogastric artery. Coil embolization
of the anterior branches and the hypogastric
aneurysm was achieved. All the feeding branches
Fig. 66.1 CTA of the abdomen and pelvis showing large AAA with angulated aortic neck, bilateral common iliac
artery aneurysms and left hypogastric artery (HA) aneurysm
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_66
291

292
Fig. 66.2 Coil embolization of branches of left HA and HA aneurysm
66 Endovascular Aneurysm Repair forAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Bilateral Common Iliac Artery…
of the left hypogastric aneurysm were successfully occluded as demonstrated by the completion arteriogram (Fig.66.2). On June 29, 2019,
patient underwent endovascular aneurysm repair
(EVAR) using EXCLUDER® device (W.L.Gore,
Newark, DE).
1. Main body from left side 31×14.5×170mm
with left iliac extension limb of 12×120mm
and a second left iliac extension limb
12×70mm
2. Iliac branch EXCLUDER® device (IBE)
23 × 12 × 100 mm, right hypogastric artery
Connect 14.5× 70mm and a bridge stent on
the right side 27×120mm
Because of the severe angulation of the aortic
neck and large bilateral iliac aneurysms, gate
capture from the retrograde femoral approach
became difcult. After multiple unsuccessful
attempts, gate was captured via a left brachial
artery approach and snared from the main body
of the iliac branch device using e-snare. A hypogastric limb of 14 × 70 mm was deployed followed by deployment of a bridge stent
27× 120mm. Following balloon angioplasty of
Fig. 66.3 Completion aortogram showing successful
exclusion of AAA with right IBE device
the aortic neck and overlapping zones in the stent
grafts, completion arteriogram was performed
which showed satisfactory exclusion of the AAA
with patency of both renal arteries and right
hypogastric artery (Fig. 66.3). In a follow-up
CTA of the abdomen and pelvis on August 21,

Discussion
293
Fig. 66.4 Follow-up CTA showing satisfactory exclusion of aneurysm, bilateral CIA aneurysm and IBE device
2019, aneurysm sac measurement remained stable at 7.1 × 7.1 cm with patency of the right
hypogastric artery (Fig.66.4).
artery occlusion is approximately 25% in
patients who underwent staged procedure to
occlude the contralateral hypogastric artery
(contralateral to IBE device). The most common reason for exclusion of patients for the use
Discussion
of IBE device data (63% excluded in Schneider’s
report) is transverse diameter of common iliac
Schneider etal. reported 63 patients enrolled in
IBE multicenter trial (2013–2015). All patients
had a single IBE device with a follow-up at
30days and 6 months. Successful deployment,
patency of all IBE components, and freedom
from type I or III endoleak was 95.2% (60 of
63) [1]. Three patients with loss of internal iliac
artery patency remained asymptomatic. The
rate of buttock claudication after internal iliac
artery <17 mm and inadequate internal iliac
artery landing zones because of internal iliac
artery aneurysm or severe internal iliac artery
occlusive disease. Karthikesalingam et al.
reviewed results from nine different series of
IBE device which included 196 patients with
initial technical success in 85–100% [2]. Parlani
etal. [3] and Austermann etal. [4] reported sat-
isfactory patency (>90%) and freedom from

294
66 Endovascular Aneurysm Repair forAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Bilateral Common Iliac Artery…
re-intervention >80% with symptoms of claudication in a very small number of cases. Although
symptoms of intermittent claudication were not
a major concern in this elderly patient with
fairly advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease, maintaining patency of one hypogastric artery was important as contralateral hypogastric artery occlusion has to be performed for
hypogastric artery aneurysm and deploying the
graft in the left external iliac artery. The maintenance of hypogastric artery perfusion helps in
preventing the symptoms of pelvic ischemia. In
this patient careful follow-up with imaging
(CTA and abdominal aortic ultrasound) will be
important as aortic neck angulation may lead to
Type 1A endoleak at longer follow-up.
References
1. Schneider DB, Matsumura JS, Lee JT, Peterson
BG. Prospective multicenter study of endovascular repair of aortoiliac and iliac aneurysm using
Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg.
2017;66(3):775–85.
2. Karthikesalingam A, Hinchcliffe RJ, Holt PJ, Boyle
JR, etal. Endovascular aneurysm repair with preservation of the internal iliac artery using the iliac branch
device. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:285–94.
3. Parlani G, Verzini F, DeRango P, Brambilla D, etal.
Long-term results of iliac aneurysm repair with
iliac branch endograft: a ve-year experience on
100 consecutive cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.
2012;43:287–92.
4. Austermann M, Bisdas T, Torsello G, Bosiers MJ,
etal. Outcomes of a novel technique of endovascular
repair of aneurysmal iliac arteries using iliac branch
device. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:1186–91.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
withLate Graft Limb Occlusion
67
History andPhysical Examination
A 65-year-old female underwent endovascular
aneurysm repair (EVAR) for a 5.5 cm (transverse/ap diameter) infrarenal abdominal aortic
aneurysm (AAA) using AneuRx graft in October
2009 (Fig. 67.1). Main body of the graft was
deployed from the right side 28×16×165mm,
contralateral limb 16×16×115 mm, and right
iliac extension limbs 16×16×85mm, in addi-
Fig. 67.1 Preoperative CTA of the abdomen and pelvis
(lateral view) demonstrating a 5.5 cm AP diameter AAA
tion a left iliac extension limb 16×16×85mm
as well. Medical comorbidities included chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease secondary to nicotine abuse (80 pack years). She also had evidence
of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease with
slightly diminished bilateral femoral pulses.
Popliteal posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis pulses
were absent, and ankle brachial index was 0.6 on
the right and 0.5 on the left due to bilateral supercial femoral artery occlusive disease. Past surgical history included left carotid endarterectomy.
Follow-up CTA of the abdomen and pelvis and
abdominal duplex ultrasound showed no evidence of endoleak and gradual diminishing in
size of the aneurysm sac. During follow-up
(2014), the ankle brachial index on the right side
decreased to 0.46 and on the left side to 0.42.
CTA of the abdomen and pelvis (July 2015)
showed successful exclusion of the AAA with
patent bilateral renal arteries; however there was
evidence of stenosis at the distal end of the left
common iliac stent graft, and there was evidence
of diffuse narrowing of the left external iliac
artery (Fig. 67.2). Patient refused any further
intervention for arterial occlusive disease. In July
2018, patient was seen in the outpatient clinic
with ischemic rest pain and dry gangrene of the
tip of the left big toe. She underwent CTA
(Fig.67.3) and abdominal aortography with runoff which showed occlusion of the left limb of the
aortobifemoral graft which had been performed
8 years and 8 months previously.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_67
295

296
Fig. 67.2 Postoperative CTA showing aortic stent graft
with stenosis near the distal attachment of left endograft
limb
67 Endovascular Aneurysm Repair withLate Graft Limb Occlusion
artery. Patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day (September 21, 2018).
Patient was seen in the clinic with a decrease
in the ankle brachial index on the right side of
0.23 and increase in the ankle brachial index of
0.66 on the left. Just prior to performance of
crossover femoral-femoral graft, the ankle brachial index on the right side was 0.34 and on the
left 0.22. It was presumed that because of the
right lower extremity arterial occlusive disease,
there was some element of steal syndrome following femoral-femoral reconstruction.
Gangrenous changes in the left big toe healed in
subsequent 4–6 weeks.
Follow-up aortogram on October 3, 2018, for
ischemic rest pain on the right foot showed that
the crossover graft was patent and there was stenosis at the origin of right deep femoral artery. In
addition, there was poor visualization of right
supercial femoral artery with probable signicant occlusive disease (Fig. 67.4). However,
patient’s ischemic symptoms continued to
improve, and in March 2019, ankle brachial
index on the right side increased to 0.33, and on
the left side, it decreased to 0.48. Patient had noninvasive Doppler arterial study on November 11,
2019, which showed ankle brachial index on the
right 0.49 and on the left 0.59.
Fig. 67.3 CTA showing graft limb occlusion
Procedure
A crossover femoral-femoral graft (8 mm
INTERING® W.L.Gore, Newark, DE) was performed along with a bovine pericardial patch
which was sutured to the common femoral and
proximal supercial femoral artery, and the origin of the crossover femoral-femoral graft was
through an incision in the patch and the common
femoral artery. In addition, patient underwent
limited endarterectomy of the common femoral
Discussion
Iliac limb occlusion occurred in 5–6% undergoing EVAR from a meta-analysis of 13 studies
comprising 5454 patients [1]. These patients
underwent EVAR from 1995 to 2014 with one
half of the patients presented within 3 days of
EVAR [1]. Martas etal. reported 18 limb occlusions (4.1%) among 439 patients treated with
EVAR from 2010 to 2013 [2]. They observed that
presence of signicant angulation and calcication of the iliac arteries as well as excessive limb
oversizing appears to be important predictors of
graft limb occlusion [2].
Faure et al. reported 42 stent graft limb
occlusions in 39 patients (3.4%) from the
Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global

References
Fig. 67.4 Aortogram and runoff following crossover femoral-femoral graft showing poor visualization of arteries in
the right lower extremity
297
Postmarket Registry (ENGAGE). The strongest
independent predictors for limb occlusion were
distal landing zone in the external iliac artery,
external iliac artery diameter of <10 mm, and
kinking of the external iliac artery [3]. Nicholson
et al. measured inow resistance by placing a
Doppler probe in the donor femoral artery and
recording simultaneous blood pressure from the
brachial artery and donor common femoral
artery [4]. The development of donor limb ischemia as occurred in this patient postoperatively
may not be due to steal syndrome. The amelioration of symptoms in the left lower extremity
may unmask less severe arterial insufciency in
the contralateral leg, or it may be due to clamp
injury or anastomotic stenosis at the donor femoral site [4]. Like many patients with femoral
artery occlusive disease, signicant improve-
ment occurs due to development of collateral
circulation.
References
1. Hammond A, Hansrani V, Lowe C, Asghar I, etal.
Meta-analysis and meta regression of iliac limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg.
2018;68:1916–24.
2. Martas GK, Antonopoulos CN, Sfyrorers GS,
Moulakakis KG. Factors predisposing to endograft
limb occlusion after endovascular aortic aneurysm
repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015:4939–49.
3. Faure EM, Becquemin JP, Cochennec I. Predictive
factors for limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:1138–45.
4. Nicholson ML, Beard JD, Horrocks M.Intraoperative
inow resistance measurement: a predictor of steal
syndrome following femoral-femoral bypass grafting.
Br J Vasc Surg. 1988;75:1064–6.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
